Why G-2 anomaly the first time is seen in Fermilab?

There are two possible explanations for the Muon G-2 anomaly.

1) The unknown natural force affected that particle

2) Particle impacts with some unseen particle. So could that impact be the interaction between the dark matter particle? 

The theory of axions bases the idea that this hypothetical particle forms thing, called dark matter. There is the possibility that dark matter is a material that has an extremely large quantum field with visible material. So similar but more high-energy quarks are forming that material. There is also the possibility. That the hypothetical axions are like some other well-known particles. That have different shapes or different sizes. 

In some theories, the Big Bang that forms the visible universe was the collapse in the energy level of dark matter.  When something caused the quantum fields of dark matter to collapse they send the radiation. So the dark matter could be a higher energetic material that has a larger quantum field than visible material. 

x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x

The Muon G-2 anomaly challenged the Standard model of physics. The reason why that anomaly is seen in the Fermilab. And other low-energy particles accelerators are an interesting thing. 

In high-power particle accelerators, the effect that changes the trajectory of the particle must be far stronger than in low-energy particle accelerators. The thing that can change the trajectory of the particle can be the impact with another particle or it can be some kind of power- or quantum field. 

When a particle accelerator accelerates a particle that particle acts like all other moving objects. The speed increases the kinetic energy and mass of the particle. So we can use a car as an example. What happens in a particle accelerator when the particle's speed is rising very high. When the car moves at a very high-speed impacts something that car continues in its track. 

In the same way, the side wind effects are less strong if the car is moving at high speed. The side coming effect must be stronger than the kinetic energy of the car that it can affect the track of the vehicle. In the same way, when the car impacts something the energy asymmetry in the body must be so strong that it can change the car's track. When a car impacts something that impact causes the soundwave, thermal wave, and debris. 

The same way happens in particle accelerators. If the speed of the particle is too high when it impacts something the particle just crushes its opponent. But that impact doesn't happen without a trace. The impact with another particle causes wave movement and debris. Those things are called virtual particles. The virtual particle is the bubble in the quantum field. 

So the virtual particle is not forming from emptiness. There must be some kind of quantum field that forms those strange fields. So is the source of the virtual particles in CERN the impact with the dark matter. When the extremely fast-moving particles are moving in particle accelerators there are forming so-called ghost particles. So could the origin of the ghost particle be the yet unknown particle? 

Se also:

Big Bang

Dark energy

Dark matter

Muon G-2 anomaly Fermilab

The standard model of physics

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

Tunguska explosion on June 30, 1908

The image I: The nuclear test at Pacific

The structure of the meteorite that caused the Tunguska detonation is a mystery. There is the possibility that the asteroid was the bite of methane ice under the dust. And that thing makes it possible that the explosion happened in the air. The fact is that nobody can prove that they saw an object flying in the air. Many people saw that explosion. But nobody has proven to see that object when it was flying. I use the term "object" for meaning the meteorite that caused the explosion. 

The fact is that the shape or form of the meteorite is a mystery. The Soviet science academy started the research of that case in 1927. And there were almost 20 years of that case. So the memories of people were not clear. And maybe some of the "witnesses" played mad because they were afraid Soviet secret police. Between the explosion and the start of research was a long time. 

 Leonid Alekseyevich Kulik (1882-1942) 

Image II

The first research of the Tunguska case began in 1921. And the notes of the first, 1921 exploration lost. The problem was the Russian civil war. So the conditions in the Soviet Union stabilized in 1923 when the civil war was over. And that's why I will claim that the first real investigations were possible in 1927. Russian mineralogist Leonid Kulik (1882-1942) was the leader of all explorations in that area.  In the years 1921, 1927, and 1937. 

There was the First World War, the Russian revolution, and the civil war. That means the research team had a very small chance to solve that mystery. When the story of the changing trajectory of the object is told the researchers might just forget to ask did the self seen that thing or was it some cousin? 

And another thing is that they probably didn't ask what kind of trajectories that person saw? Did the object come to the ground at 90 degrees angle? Or was it gently and what was the position of the observer? Was that person under the trajectory? Or did that person standing at the side of the trajectory? Did that object leave smoke trails or was it like some kind of laser ray? And what color was that trail? Was it black that might be the sign of carbon meteorite that vaporizing in the atmosphere? 

Image III: The ground zero of Tunguska

If the antimatter arrived in the atmosphere that should cause the detonation in the upper atmosphere. So if the reason for the explosion was antimatter it should be inside some kind of magnetic bite. The magnetic core could cover the antimatter bite so long that it would be near the ground or at least in a deep atmosphere before the explosion happens. 

Or was there the meteorite at all? Could some kind of radiation like XRB or GRB (X- or gamma-ray burst) that the spin of electrons will turn opposite in the atmosphere. In that theory, the antimatter was formed spontaneously by the radiation impact deep in the atmosphere. So that would also explain why there is no mark of meteorite left. 

Image IV: Famous image of fallen trees in Tunguska

There are strange stories about that case. One of them was that the object that flew in the air turned its direction. But there is no evidence that the persons who told that story didn't even be there. The person who told that story didn't describe the size of the detonated object. 

The mystery is why there is no impact crater? The meteorite that exploded in the air is the answer. But the thing that caused the worries is that nobody saw anything special before that explosion happened. That means that the object that caused the detonation was quite small. So could the reason for the Tunguska detonation be the antimatter?

Image V: The marks of the explosion are still visible

The mystery of Tunguska is why the meteorite or object that dropped from the space detonated on air? The detonation didn't leave any kind of craters behind it. But the "ground zero" of that impact is still visible. Also, the fallen trees are seen on the ground. And the reason why no trees are growing on ground zero and trees are remaining so well is that the particle that detonated on air caused intense heat.

The pressure wave caused the vacuum in that area. And that thing caused that fire itself to end. Because trees didn't start to burn. That explains why there is no carbonized wood or marks of fire. 

Also, powerful wind denied that the fire had not started to burn in the area near the explosion. The vacuum, along with rising air, pulled radon up from the ground caused a small rising of the radioactivity in that area. 

How antimatter could pass the atmosphere? If the ionized antimatter particles are in the bubble of magnesite meteorite. That thing makes the situation possible that the antimatter can travel deep inside the atmosphere. When the meteorite falls through the atmosphere it will melt, and then the antimatter particles touching the air. The result is an explosion.

There is the possibility that if the extremely thin gold layer is in the bubble of the small asteroid. The cosmic radiation can cause that antimatter is forming inside those asteroids. And even a small-size asteroid can cause large destruction. 

Sometimes is introduced that the Tunguska explosion was the UFO. The thing is that there is no evidence about that thing because the meteorite vaporized in the explosion. So officially, the reason for the Tunguska explosion was the object that came from space and detonated in the atmosphere. 

https://earthsky.org/space/what-is-the-tunguska-explosion/

https://ksc.krasn.ru/en/news/micro_particles_of_the_tunguska_meteorite/

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2013.13163

http://scihi.org/leonid-kulik-tunguska-event/

Image I: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/Operation_Castle_-_Yankee.jpg

Image II:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Kulik

Image III:https://osr.org/blog/news/tunguska-asteroid-event-of-1908/

Image IV:https://media.sciencephoto.com/e6/70/00/80/e6700080-800px-wm.jpg

Image V:https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna5686713

Could the Tunguska explosion cause because by human activity? Did someone accidentally make the antimatter bomb?

I hope that I'm wrong. But in some creepy visions, the Tunguska explosion was the result of human activity. There is the possibility to make the antimatter by using lightning. The system would be the capacitor like the Leyden jar that is on the tall mast. 

Then the electricity will conduct to the extremely thin gold layer. The electricity will collect to the  Leyden jar and then sooner or later it will strike to the gold. 

If the power of the electricity is high enough that thing causes that the electrons turn to antimatter. The system can be the lightning collector and the small gold bite. The Leyden jar stores the electricity in electrolytic liquid. Then the antenna must target the gold plate. And the detonation would be impressive. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leyden_jar

https://writingsaboutmysteries.blogspot.com/

Is photon the bite of wave movement rather than particle?

There is no straight moving photon in the straight universe. The trajectory of a photon can be straight only behind the event horizon where the extremely powerful gravitation will turn it straight. In that massive gravitation field, the radiation will travel only in one direction. In the straight universe, the quantum fields are disturbing the trajectory of the photons. 

The form of the photon is interesting. The reason for that is that the photon has no mass. And that is the reason why the photon has the top speed in nature. The speed of light is also an interesting thing. The limit for that is about 299 792 458 m/s. 

But there is one thing in the speed of the photon. And that is that the speed of light is a relative thing. The speed of a photon is lower in a thicker medium than in a vacuum. And the speed of light is lower in the water than in the air. Because photon has no mass. The forces of the other particles will cause that the trajectories of photons are not straight. There are no straight-moving photons in the universe. The density of the medium causes that the speed of light is changing. 

It's the cosmic constant. But also relatively chancing constant. The speed of photons depends on the form of the medium. The speed of a photon is top but it's relative. 

So the particle can cross the speed of light when it hits the medium which is denser than the space where it comes from. During the slowing, the particle must transfer its kinetic energy to the medium as the Cherenkov-radiation or the blue shine around the nuclear reactor. The Cherenkov-radiation is like the sonic boom but the speed of the particle is higher. And the size of it is smaller than in the case of aircraft. 

If the photon is like tape in the black hole, the massive gravitation will pull the bite of electromagnetic straight.

So is photon flat? In that case, the form of the traveling photon could be like tape.  And when the photon stops it would turn to the shape of the ball. So if the traveling photon is like tape that means it would not touch the quantum field. Because photons would elude the quantum field measuring its mass is extremely difficult. 

In that case, only the photon that impacts the quantum field by using the perpendicular trajectories can transmit the energy to the quantum field. The observations of the material happen by reflection. 

When photons impact the quantum field. That impact increases its energy. After that, the quantum field will deliver the extra energy back by releasing a photon. 

The form of the photon is interesting. If a particle would not have mass it should not have the ability to transfer energy. And that thing is making the photon extremely interesting thing. So there must be something in the form of the photon that makes it able to transmit energy. 

And there is a possibility that the photon is more wave movement than the particle. Or if we are thinking of the wave-particle duality there is the possibility that photon has the form of the bite of wave movement. That means the photon could be flat. In this version of the form of a photon. 

The traveling photon flattens by a quantum field. While it's traveling. And when the photon is stopped it would take the form of the ball. So is photon the particle between the material and the radiation? The thing is that photon is transmitting energy is real. But the thing about how this happens is a little bit of mystery. The mass is connected with energy. 

And if the particle doesn't have mass. That means it should not able to transmit energy to the particles. But if the photon is flat, that thing could mean that it would impact energy to the quantum field around the atoms and other particles. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon

Image(): https://nineplanets.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Light-speed-ad73-1024x576.jpg

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

This is what the orbital railgun would look like

Illustration picture
Picture I

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/this-is-what-orbital-railgun-would-look.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

In this picture is an artist impression of the combat spacecraft, and it could be one version of "Project Thor", what was mentioned for the high power railgun, what is planned to send to the orbiter. In fact, the "Thor" was not pure railgun, what would use the pure magnetic accelerator. This system was mentioned to be like the extremely powerful airgun. Behind the accelerator was a chamber, what was filled with the hydrogen and oxygen gases, and then this gas combination would be ignited with the electric arc, and that would push the iron projectile to the accelerator.


Then the magnetic rail would give extra speed to that projectile. That magnetic accelerator could have the capacity, that it can be pulled inside the satellite, that nobody sees it from outside. The rail would be kilometers long, and it can be made extremely thin cables and magnets. In the empty space, the rail would need no tube, and that's why it could be very light. This system could accelerate the nail at the speed of 30 000 to 100 000 kilometers per hour, and in that speed, the impact power would be so high, that this weapon can cause similar damages, as the nuclear warhead.


The United States Air Force would be reported that the  6.1 meters long and 0,3 meters thick tungsten cylinder, what have the speed of Mach 10 could have same impact energy as the 11.5 tons of TNT. In this scenario, the railgun seemed like some revolver, where the tungsten arrows were in the revolver-type drum, what would be rotating, and turn the next arrow to the port of the rail. This system might have more deadly models, where would be used longer rails and more electric powers than this original "Odin" system. And this kind of system can someday turn the impacting asteroid away from Earth, but it can also be used for orbital bombardment.


Rail of this machine could be pulled inside when it would not be in use. This system can work with the nuclear reactor, but also solar panels are suitable for that device. When the weapon would be launched, the same mass of fuel must be burned in opposite side of the tube, that the aiming of that system would not be changed. There are rumors, that there would be planning of the even more powerful railgun than this device.


The rumors tell that "Project Odin" could be series of satellites, what would be docked together, and thru those satellites would go the accelerator trajectory. That modular system could give same speed as the "Hadron" accelerator. And the iron ammunition could travel near the speed of light to the target. The iron nail what travels the 90% of the speed of light would have so much impact power, that it would destroy the planets like Jupiter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment

Picture I
https://dissolve.com/video/Futuristic-military-spacecraft-initiating-warp-drive-royalty-free-stock-video-footage/001-D915-8-004

Lockheed CL-400 "Suntan"

CL-400 "Suntan"
(Picture I)

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/p/lockheed-cl-400-suntan.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Lockheed CL-400 "Suntan" test plane from 1950's is not so well-known as the U-2 or some other reconnaissance planes, what were made under the legendary C.H "Kelly" Johnson at the Lockheed "Skunk Works". This plane was the first attempt to create the hydrogen-powered aircraft, and the experience of that plane was after used to create "Skylon" space planes and other hydrogen-powered aircraft.


"Suntan" is looking unique, because the motors are at the end of the wings, and that solution gave extra protection for the test pilot because if the motors were exploded, the debris would not come thru the fuselage. Other reasons for that solution was, that it gave more space in the fuselage, and the heat of those motors would not warm the fuel tanks. Sometimes have been mentioned, that the position of the motors guaranteed cleaner air intake.


There actually were many reasons for the positioning of motors so far away from the pilot as possible because nobody knew anything about the use of hydrogen in the jet motors, and that made "Suntan" extremely dangerous for its pilot. The problem with aircraft is, that should have electric power because the avionics and communication equipment needs electricity, and that makes difficult to use ramjet-motors because those motors have not the turbine, what gives electricity.

CL-400 "Suntan" 3-view drawing
(Picture II)

The "Suntan" was the unique prototype, what remained in history a half of the century until some engineers started to work with new kind of space plane "Skylon". This new space plane used the similar solutions as "Suntan", and it has the new type of solutions for creating electric power. The precise information of "Skylon" has been kept out of publicity, and the system, what is used in that plane, could be the combination of  RAT (Rapid Air Turbine), where the draught would rotate turbine and generator for creating the electric power, and at the outside of atmosphere this system uses fuel-cells.


Used motor-type might be flap-ramjet, where would be injected the oxygen when the aircraft is too high, that motors would not get enough air. This motor is known as the rocket-ramjet, and it's more conventional than scramjet. In rocket ramjet, the normal dam-tube engine would send the aircraft in high altitude, and then the flap would be closed, and oxygenized will be injected into the chamber.


For the acceleration for the speed of Mach 1 would happen by using normal jet engines.  At the speed of 800 km/h would be enough for starting ramjets, but the Mach 1 seems better. When the ramjets have been started the closing system of air intakes of the plane would start to regulate the speed of air, and the turbine would create the electric power for the aircraft. And when this aircraft would rise high altitude, would the oxygen injection start, and the "Skylon" would start the "ballistic jump".

Skylon
(Picture III)

The reason, why this plane would not use internal oxygen is that the solution, where the part of the flight time would be used external oxygen will spend the weight of this plane, and also give more room for cargo. The cargo of this system would be satellites, what would be launched to the LEO (Low Earth Orbiter). This might not seem very impressive, but there is a possibility that to this satellite will be docking the rocket stage, what would launch with the different shuttle or rocket. This would give the opportunity to use large rocket stages like "Centaur"-stages.


Those stages would allow the satellite to make maneuvers in the trajectory, and that would improve the survivability of the civil and military satellites. Those satellites can make the evasion movements in the case, that something would try to impact with the satellite. And also the sudden changes in horizontal and vertical trajectories is more easy with the large rocket stages. But also the launch of the space probes would be possible, and that would mean, that the probe would be released to LEO, and then necessary rocket stages will be connected to it.

Sources:

https://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/systems/suntan-8.htm

https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/22765/why-did-the-cl-400-suntan-have-engines-on-the-ends-of-its-wings

https://history.nasa.gov/SP-4404/ch8-3.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skylon_(spacecraft)

Picture I

https://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/systems/images/suntan-image04.jpg

Picture II

http://xplanes.free.fr/suntan/images/cl-400.jpeg

Picture III

http://www.bisbos.com/images_rel/skylon_2_800.jpg

The combat spacecraft are quite easy to produce

Mercury capsule
(Picture I)

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/p/the-combat-spacecraft-are-quite-easy-to.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are many ways to make realistic combat spacecraft and the governments of the USA, Russia, and China might have many versions of those things, what seems like some Science Fiction stuff. One of the most realistic versions of making "killer satellite"is used as a "Mercury"-type spacecraft, what is filled with plastic explosives. The nose of the spacecraft must be weaker than another layer, and then the explosives just break the core of the spacecraft, and at the front of the explosives might be steel balls, what would travel to the target with extremely high speed.


The problem with that device is actually the debris, what would close the trajectory from all satellites. This is why the military space systems are not allowed to test in space. And that's why there is created the anti-satellite weapons, what uses microwaves to destroying the targeted satellites. Microwave would be unseen, and the target would not break in the pieces, what can cause dangerous debris.

EMP-bomb
(Picture II)

One version of this weapon, what would base the existing technology of this thing could be manned or unmanned  " Mercury"-type spacecraft, what would be equipped with the microwave burst weapon. The principle of this killer satellite is similar to high power microwave bomb, what is dropped from conventional bombers, and that weapon could damage electronics and other equipment in the very sharp area.


This system works that high-explosive material would give pressure to the battery, what is inside that weapon. And after that, the high voltage electricity would be conducted to the microwave transmitter what is at the nose of this weapon. If this technology would be used with killer satellites, they would take off the enemy's space systems without radioactive fallout, and if that system uses microwaves, there would not be debris in that trajectory.


This system would be a single shot version of killer satellites, but it can be very effective and realistic version of the killer satellites. In this case, the ground control would drive this system near the targeted satellite, and then shoot it with microwave. It could also be used against attacking missiles, and at least couple of them would be damaged if the raising missile would get hit by high power EMP-weapon, what could damage the targeting systems of the warheads.

Sources:

http://www.superconductors.org/emp-bomb.htm

Picture I

http://nick-stevens.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/mercury.jpg

Picture II

http://www.superconductors.org/e-pic2.jpg

Why is the defense against hypersonic cruise missile so difficult?

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Hypersonic missile or cruise missile (HCM) is the new type of weapon, what uses technology that allows the weapon glide to the ground with the extremely high speed with gentle incoming trajectory. This would give the very big challenge for the defense, what must react this threat only in a couple of seconds. The launching of those extremely fast weapons may be done by submarines, surface warships or by aircraft. This weapon is the new type of solution for first strike missions.


Hypersonic cruise missiles are developed in many nations. The limitations of this kind of weapon are very difficult because they don't need warheads. And the kinetic energy what is boosted with microwaves is the devastating combination for aircraft carriers. The microwave-transmitter can installed to the nose of those missiles, and it can be got the necessary electric power from windmill turbogenerators.


The extremely high speed would give very powerful microwaves. The microwaves would be devastating for the target, and if they are not enough, would the kinetic energy terminate the structure, when the missile hits the target with speed above Mach 8. And those hypersonic cruise missiles can accelerate up to speed Mach 12.  The kinetic energy would be very devastating at that speed. But the problem is, that those missiles can mask as the new superfast airplane-testbeds.


One of the greatest problems with hypersonic missiles is that they use so-called low observable technology. That means that the head of that missile is invincible for radars because the shape of the hypersonic body would be similar with B-2 Stealth-bomber. And the gentle shape what allows to avoid the radar-waves would also allow avoiding the friction of the atmosphere.


The final problem with those weapons is that some of them are equipped with similar ECM-systems, what makes the detecting and targeting the air defense missiles to this hypersonic target extremely difficult. Also, some of those missiles are equipped with microwave generators, what mission will be heat the target and make their armor softer, what gives the missile greater penetration. Another mission of those microwave systems is also terminate the electric systems of the target.


As I have written earlier, those hypersonic cruise missiles can destroy even the aircraft carriers by using kinetic energy. The nuclear warhead makes those weapons even more devastating. The gentle trajectory would allow striking against the doors of underground leading facilities. The weapon can strike against the door of those facilities. And it can detonate just outside the cave, what protects the command center. The only problem is that nuclear warhead must detonate in microseconds.

Sources:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3091715/Air-Force-bosses-reveal-want-hypersonic-missiles-five-years-technology-planes-travel-New-York-London-HOUR.html

http://thehill.com/sponsored/content/245420-no-longer-science-fiction-facing-global-threats-with-hypersonic-missiles

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/could-uss-new-hypersonic-missile-spark-world-war-3-1555182

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WU-14

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA_Falcon_Project

Picture 1:

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/05/21/21/28F4371C00000578-3091715-image-a-1_1432241560991.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/why-is-defense-against-hypersonic.html