Can the three object problem be the key to the gravitation?

When we want to calculate the position of two objects. Those are orbiting each other that thing is really easy. But when we are involving the third object in this problem that thing makes everything so hard that even the best computers cannot calculate that thing. The fact is that the position of the three objects in the orbiting system should be easy to calculate. But the results of those calculations have no match with reality. 

The thing is that the gravitation waves are proven that gravitation is some kind of wave movement like light. That thing can help us to model the situation. That makes those calculations very hard. If we are thinking that between the objects is the channel where the power of quantum fields is lower than around the channel. And the pressure of outcoming radiation will push the particles together that thing can explain why the third object makes the system very hard to calculate. 

When the channel with lower energy quantum fields is forming between two objects. That makes them positioned in the same system. If we are using the regular terms. We can say that the pressure between those objects is lower than around them. 

Diagram 1

And the third object is pulling the third quantum field through that channel. That can cause the pushing effect of unpredictable things in the quantum fields. Between those three objects. In the diagram, there is the model of how the third object is affecting the gravitational channel or quantum channel between the objects. 

It pulls the gravitational waves or gravitational curves through that channel. And when the third part of the system is orbiting the entirety. When the position of the third object changes the form and direction of the energy curve are also changed. That means the entirety of the three object systems is incredibly hard to calculate. 

https://www.wired.com/2016/06/way-solve-three-body-problem/

Researchers use binary star systems or triple stars to confirm the calculations. 

 Above this text is an artist's impression of the binary-star system GG-Tauri A (https://www.universetoday.com/Double Disc Found Feeding Each Other In Binary Star System)

Four effects are affecting that system.

1) Pure gravitational effect

2)Centripetal force 

3)Electromagnetic interaction

4) Effect of other members of the system

When we are thinking about the objects of a three-member system the third part will not pull only gravitational fields through two main objects. It pulls also ions and other particles to those objects. Even if the effect of those particles is minimal. That effect can last even millions or billions of years. In the real universe, the electromagnetic effects are not stable. Many high-energy reactions happen suddenly. And that thing causes unpredicted changes in the radiation of the stars. 

When we are looking at the binary-star systems there are also the ion bridges between those stars. The third part is also affecting that bridge. And the electromagnetic radiation will also be affecting that bridge. The gas bridge between the stars is high energetic plasma. That plasma is acting as an antenna and all electromagnetic radiation effects that plasma. When the temperature of the plasma is increasing. That thing that causes the heat of plasma is also pushing those stars away as well as gravitation is pulling them together. 

Image) https://www.universetoday.com/115494/double-disc-found-feeding-each-other-in-binary-star-system/

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

Machine learning needs stimulus for making solutions.

 

 Machine learning needs stimulus for making solutions. 

"A barren plateau is a trainability problem that occurs in machine learning optimization algorithms when the problem-solving space turns flat as the algorithm is run. Researchers at Los Alamos National Laboratory have developed theorems to prove that any given algorithm will avoid a barren plateau as it scales up to run on a quantum computer." (https://www.lanl.gov/discover/news-release-archive/2021/March/0319-barren-plateaus.php)

Have you heard of a "barren plateaus" problem? The name of that problem is coming from the J.R.R Tolkien book. Wherein the fictive Middle land is the very dry and hot place. The image, above this text, introduces the "barren plateaus" problem very well. 

In the next example, the food and water are the information. If a creature lives in the "fresh plateaus" it can take nutrients from nature. There is a bigger chance to make mistakes. But the nutrient is versatile and finding and testing new things makes the creature in the work. When a creature searches for things from nature there are many possibilities to test which type of vegetables or other nutrient sources the creature uses. Of course, that thing requires sometimes rise to the mountains. 

In that image, the problem is the mountain. The thing is that if the creature lives on the landscape at the higher image. That creature has stimulus. The green landscape offers motivation and the grass is the food and the creature wants to go to the mountain. The grass and water are everywhere and the creature has the motivation to rise to the mountain. And that could be willing to see the farter places. Or maybe the creature wants to get fresh air. 

The lower image introduces the situation. Where the creature lives in the "barren plateau". The water and food are in a pocket or bag and of course, the creature never makes mistakes if that creature wants to get a certain sandwich. The creature knows which pocket that creature can get sausage sandwich and where is the drinking bottle. But sooner or later, the nutrient would turn unilateral. In barren plateaus problem, the creature will get pre-made food. 

So if we are transferring that model to the information technology the creature will get pre-made solutions that fit in certain situations. And that makes this kind of model very limited. The situation is like that creature lives in the desert or "barren plateaus". The supporter brings water and sandwich to a certain point at a certain time. The food is guaranteed but it's always the same. 

And what the creature gets depends on the supporter. If the supporter wants to give the sausage sandwich that is the food. If someday the supporter wants to give the cheese sandwich that creature will get a cheese sandwich. 

When everything is pre-made the creature doesn't want to try itself to find food. There is difficult to make mistakes if some other person makes the food. The same way is in data science. If all problems are pre-solved that thing means that it's very hard to make wrong solutions. 

The term "flatten landscape" means that when the creature is living in "barren plateaus" the limited information sources makes the problems look harder to solve. Because the creature always is at a certain point where the supporter will bring a sandwich and water the creature is not even trying to climb mountains or solve the problem. 

"A barren plateau is a trainability problem that occurs in machine learning optimization algorithms when the problem-solving space turns flat as the algorithm is running".

"In that situation, the algorithm can’t find the downward slope in what appears to be a featureless landscape and there’s no clear path to the energy minimum. Lacking landscape features, machine learning can’t train itself to find the solution". (LosAlamos National laboratories, Solving ‘barren plateaus’ is the key to quantum machine learning)

https://www.lanl.gov/discover/news-release-archive/2021/March/0319-barren-plateaus.php

Image:https://www.lanl.gov/discover/news-release-archive/2021/March/0319-barren-plateaus.php

https://interestandinnovation.blogspot.com/

Two zeros problem with a microprocessor (How to send two "empty" marks one after other?)

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Problem with the microprocessor is caused by a number "zero" or empty. The idea of the system is that one is when there is electricity in the wire, and zero is when the wire is without voltage. thing.  What makes this thing problematic for the microprocessor is to separate two lines of the binary code. This thing might feel very easy to answer, but the problem is that the computer's microchip can only handle numbers one and zero, what means that giving the "break" mark has not many things to choose.

When we have only two things what to choose, and those things must be used for other purposes, must the system somehow separate two different programs, what makes impossible to send the break marks by using some different marks. And the problem is, how to separate the separation mark from other marks.

As I have written in binary code is only numbers one and zero, and when the next series of the binary code is transmitted in the processor, must the computer know, when the first line ends and the second line of the binary code starts. If that is not determined, would the computer not able to tell the difference for a computer of two different programs. When the computer works the clock is determining the time, what means zero in the line of the code and what is the length of the cut in the electric circuit, when the processor is going to begin to drive another program.

The thing, what cuts voltage in the wire is rotating switch, what makes possible to cut the electricity in the wire by using extreme fast speed. Actually, this problem is always existing, when the processor must handle two same numbers one after the other. And the thing is very easy to explain by giving an example, "how to separate two number one or two number zero from each other?".

The answer is very simple, the microprocessor must have the only clock, what determines the length of the electric cuts, and when the length of electricity cutting limits certain time, would that determine that the cut means that there is sending number zero. But how microprocessor would separate break or zero and the end of the program code from each other is a very difficult thing. In theory, there should be a mark, what is send before each mark, but the thing is that it would be done by the second microprocessor and that only transfers this problem to another place in the microcircuit.

The political campaign is the different way to say "propaganda"

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The strange relationship between propaganda and politics is the thing, what has recently become to the public knowledge. The thing is sensitive because nobody wants to deal with propagandists, but the western way to make propaganda is more effective than the way, what it is done in somewhere east. The main difference between the historical and modern propagandists is that the modern version actually confess that thing.

Western propagandists always claim that they confess to making propaganda. Or delivering information, what might not be true, and the modern propagandist doesn’t actually claim to make propaganda. This person makes commercials what are the accepted version of propaganda. And this makes me make one question. What was the role of German propagandists after the Second World war? The idea to hide those men, from the Joseph Goebbels ministry of propaganda was not good, because those persons seem "clean" from the outsider.

They were not in any war photo standing at the front of the skulls or bodies of murdered prisoners. But in this case, the more interesting was the thing, what people couldn't see. Many of those persons were in the key role when the opinion at Germany transferred to support national socialists and persecution of political enemies and ethnic minorities like Jews. But the propaganda was the reason, why those persons were hired by CIA for making propaganda to the Warsaw pact and especially to East Germany, and those German men had no language problems with that thing.

The German version of propaganda has shown its effect and influence because it raised Nazis to the power. And that is the reason, why those persons might be very wanted for making the campaigns for the politicians. And there is one thing, what people normally don't mention. Those persons who made propaganda were not on the place, where Holocaust happened, and this makes difficult to testify against them. They were made the things, what allowed Germans persecute Jews. And that made them responsible for murders. But those men were ever seen in the death camps, and they used the material, what other persons produced. This meant, that there was no evidence against them.

When we are looking at the political campaigns, we can say that the name "campaign" is in political field the synonym for the word "propaganda". And in fact, political salesmen are always users of propaganda.  But the word propaganda has been replaced by saying "political campaign", what is the very good word. But the purpose of political campaigns always gives the candidate influence for the great audience. The great audience is the thing, what brings votes. And the votes are the most important thing when somebody wants to get to the place, where the rulers of the nation sit, and in those cases, the candidate would not always be informed about the methodology, what the campaign machine would use.

The problems in the interviews are persons, who are experienced liars.

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The normal lie detectors detect the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous and muscular reactions. Those machines tell how experienced a liar is a person, who is interviewed. And how many sensors that person can pass tells about the mind control, what the person uses in those situations. Experienced yogists and handlers of the relaxing methodologies can pass many of those sensors, and that makes them suspected the trained liar, who wants to get in the system.


In fact is possible to pass the lie detector tests, where the system detects the actions of the sympathetic nervous system, but the parasympathetic nervous system tells if the person is the liar. The most modern lie detectors are actually the CAT (Computer Aided Tomography) scanners, what follows the blood flow in the brains, and this system would base on the knowledge, that different brain areas are activating, if the person lies.


Also, infra-red cameras can detect the blush, when the veins under the skin are expanding, and the skin temperature would rise. The recordings can also analyze, and the length of the breaks, and how people say some words tell if that person is telling the lies. When the applicant imagines something, this person has to think those words more carefully. And that's why the speech has a different tempo than normally.


When we would use imagination, what is needed for generating the lies, that means that we need more brain capacity in that process, than we are telling the truth. But when we are getting to job interviews, we might sometimes think that it's very easy to tell the lies about the jobs, what the person is done before. One of the worst mistake in those cases is a start to tell the interviewer, that the candidate is not learned anything at school. And this is the sign, that the graduation means nothing to that person. That candidate tells that the examinations were easy, and that might mean, that somebody else is done them.


Another way to screw is, that the sender of the letter and CV seems to be the little bit different than the person, who sits opposite of the table. In that cases, the person, who comes into the room seems like overdressed for the job, what that person looks for. In some cases, the suspicious thing is that the former workplace seems to train that applicant with the very big sum of money, and the kicked that person out. The courses, what that person got have paid even millions of Euros, and then the company finishes the relation.


The suspicious thing is also if the applicant has so-called point-training for that place.  The thing, what tells that person has ever done nothing is the claiming, that there were no mistakes. It's difficult to make mistakes if the person does nothing and just sits on the chair. And in the real world is impossible to live without making mistakes, or the person must sit in the room, and do nothing. But that would not please the work offender, because the worker is what the employer wants.


That means that the person has the courses and certificates, what fits for that specific job, but there is no official training as a professional. In the schools is one problem, and it is, that some person just sits in the teams, and does nothing. Other persons would tolerate those things because this particular person would offer them jobs from the company, what is owned the parents.  And those cases are very problematic because they can revenge their schoolmates the failing.

https://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/talous/artikkeli/miljardoori-elon-musk-selvittaa-yksinkertaisella-konstilla-tyonhakijan-puheiden-todenperaisyyden/7093722#gs.4Kmcx2o

Is there something, what is hidden even for AREA-51?

Picture I

https://vapaaverkkojulkaiseminen.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

These pictures are about trucks, what takes cargo to AREA-51, and there is one big question, why that very large stuff would not be carried straight to that military area by using areas own airfield.  The upper photo (Photo I) has been published in many aircraft publications, and it's quite famous. The second photo is taken from the Internet and found by using the phrase "Trucks to area 51".


When we are thinking about the upper photo, we might see something strange in it. One thing about this quite famous photograph is that this cargo is very huge, and that's why it would have problems with tunnels. The box so wide, that the truck would be very visible and in the narrow roads must the special arrangements made for the traffic, what comes against this cargo because otherwise would be an accident near.

Picture II

The controlling of this truck would be extremely difficult because if the cargo would transfer anyway, would this box drop from the back of the truck. This is the reason, why I suspect that this truck would not drive quite a long trip. If the delivered has the right equipment,  they could lower this cargo on the top of the truck or roller coaster by using heavy lift helicopters or cranes. But the question is, why this cargo would be carried by trucks?



Where that stuff, what would be very big, and difficult to handle is carried by trucks? Where are those saucer-shaped objects coming from?  Is there something, what is secret even for the personnel, who works in the AREA-51 and S-4? If that stuff would be delivered to the trucks in somewhere in the desert, why that would be carried so difficult way? Why would they not use the special transport system what is used in shipyards? Or why those things would not load to the aircraft and fly to AREA-51? If those crews must hide their identity, they can use masks.

Picture I

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread786891/pg3

Picture II

https://alieninvestigations.tv/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Area41-UFO-web-350x230.png

How is the big threat the 3M-54 "Kalibr" missile for the West?

Picture I

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/how-is-big-threat-3m-54-kalibr-missile.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

3M-54 "Kalibr" (Nato codename SS-N-27 "Sizzler" or SS-N-30) is the newest missile technology of the Russian Federation. The missiles diameter is 533 millimeter similar to torpedo tube, and it can launch from various submarines, aircraft and surface warships. Also the ground-based, mobile launchers are available, and this weapon is the major element of CLUB-K container missile system. These missile containers would be installed in any platform or fixed bases, and that system would give any ship or other vehicles the capacity to use the effective ground attack or anti-ship weapons, and there is actually the anti-submarine version of this missile. But let's think, how big threat this missile is for the western world.


The missile itself is quite thin, and its capacity to fly supersonic speed at the end of the trajectory will make it very difficult target for the CIWS (Close-In Weapon System). But the strike capacity of that missile and its vulnerability depends on the type of the seeker. If the missiles use radar homing, the ship would able to get the warning about the strike, and it could activate it's CIWS and ECM-systems before the missile would hit. But as we know, that the missile is similar to Tomahawk, and it uses satellite navigation in the subsonic period of the flight.


And if the GLONASS would be jammed or disturbed, the missile would have difficulties to find the target. And if the missile uses image-recognition for attacking the target,  the problems with GLONASS-system could cause, that missile could not find the target. But if the missile will find the target and IIR (Imaging Infra-red) would see the target, the missile will be very deadly. In the real world, there are many ways to make the navigation system immune for jammers, and one of them is that the location of the warship will be programmed to the missile's computer, and then the flight will happen by using inertial navigation system, and when the target is calculated to be visible, would the IIR system start to drive the missile to the target.


The problem with IIR navigation is that the target would be covered by magnesium-rockets, what can blind the IIR-system. When the missile is at the end of its route would the rocket stage started and the missile will start to flight highly supersonic speed. And the infra-red systems can locate the exhaust gas of the rocket booster. This might increase the vulnerability of the missile, and also at the begin of the route when missile travels with subsonic speed, the fighters maybe can destroy it.


I don't know how advanced those missiles are, and can they change their speed during the flight, but the system is very serious threat for Western troops. It can be equipped with the conventional or nuclear warhead, and there might be the capacity to use also cluster warheads, what are effective against troop concentrations and airbases. There is one thing, what concerns about me, and that is, "why Western world is so quiet about those missiles?".


What kind of missiles western military covers? When we are thinking about the new type of missiles, we might say, that every nation keeps some of those weapons secrets, because they might give the nasty surprise for the enemy. The similar missiles what "Kalibr" is might be used in new hypersonic missile systems, where the rocket booster would take the missile to "ballistic jump" outside the atmosphere, and then the ramjets would start to drive them to the target.


The small diameter of that kind of weapon would make it very difficult to intercept. And the submarine launch ballistic missiles like R-29RMU2 "Layner" could carry at least four of those hypersonic cruise missiles, what makes that strike very lethal. The "Kalibr" is the spine of the modern Russian military strike capacity, and it could be the lethal and dangerous weapon for any target on the sea or land.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-29RMU2_Layner

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3M-54_Kalibr

Picture I

https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/b/3m-54-klub-20196753.jpg

Why is somebody not satisfied with the meeting between Trump And Kim?

Nice photo about meeting
(Picture I)

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/why-is-somebody-not-satisfied-with.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There would be the greatest disappointment in the world. The nuclear war didn't start in the Korean peninsula. There have been many writings in the media, that the meeting between the leaders of the USA and North Korean leaders should not be done, and some persons seem very disappointed about this meeting, what was the first between the USA and North Korea. If we think this case very sarcastic way, the thing, what is always disappointed in the case, where some nations would normalize their relationship, or making something else than building nuclear weapons and shoots the opponents.


There is sometimes the persons, who believe, that the attacking another country would bring the peace, and of course, the media would be filled with the pictures of human sacrifices. Also, the attacker would be the nation, what always want the war against other nations. When we are thinking about Donald Trump, this man has not yet begun any war, and that makes him very different than Barack Obama, and the media supported strongly the choice of Hillary Clinton in the presidential election campaign in the USA. And now the media would not be seen, what it wanted.


Trump didn't attack North Korea and proved that he would be some kind of war maniac, who always want to attack other countries. This is the problem with the United States. This nation is always welcome when the force is needed but during the campaign, the media starts to blame the U.S military men as the war criminals, and of course, the opponent is always the heroic fighter, what causes terrible losses to U.S military forces. And when we are thinking about this kind of things, we might face the truth, that this time Trump didn't make the favor for his political enemies, and attacked North Korea, what would cause the billions of deaths.


When we are searching the reason, why the conflicts, what is so far away, are so popular in the newspapers in Europe, we must say that some of the local politicians and newspapermen need those conflicts to turn the heads of the people away from ordinary problems like growing differences of salary, the loss of homes and many more things, what we should talk  in everyday life. Those problems are easy to cover with the stories of the war, what was, of course, started the militaristic USA because it is the evilest country in the world.  And then we could face the situation, where the opponent, North Korea would become the puppy of the media.


This is the normal news in media. And the problem with that kind of writings is, that they would support the dictators and the only part, what is listened, would be the opponent of the USA. There have been many persons, who would like that kind of conflicts. And many people would support anybody, who makes harm to the USA.  There have been persons, who would believe, that everything, what the intelligence community makes is some kind of crimes. And they support everybody, who shares harmful information about those organizations. But there would be little conflict between media and Trump because media is always against this man, but at the same time, there would be waited for support about divorcing some persons, who were not satisfied the press, what will tell the people, how unctuous those leaders smile was in the meeting.


And when we are talking about Chinese pearls of wisdom, many of them are made in other countries. But when we are thinking about the thing, what Ivanka Trump wrote in the social media, I must say, that this phrase was very good.  Probably it was written somebody, who lived in Chicago, but who knows about those things. The phrase  “Those who say it can not be done, should not interrupt those doing it.” is good. And if that is written in Chicago would not make it worse, than if it would be written by some monk in Sun Tzu monastery in Tibet.  Many of those phrases, what are mentioned as "Chinese" are made the journalists, who claimed to read or hear them from some Chinese person because that would hear and be more selling by pearls of wisdom of Chinese monks than pearls of wisdom of some journalist, who worked in the newspaper at Chicago.

https://www.hs.fi/ulkomaat/art-2000005716541.html

https://demokraatti.fi/donald-trump-ja-kim-jong-un-kohtasivat-kamera-tallensi-maireat-miehet-meilla-tulee-olemaan-loistava-suhde-minulla-ei-ole-siita-epailystakaan/

https://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/ulkomaat/artikkeli/ivanka-trump-tviittasi-kiinalaisen-sananlaskun-internet-jaljitti-sanonnan-yli-sadan-vuoden-takaiseen-chicagoon/6948470#gs.54VK=6M

Picture I

https://cdni.rt.com/files/2018.02/article/5a7ef399dda4c813348b45a7.jpg

What is the problem with democracy?

(Picture I)

Kimmo Huosionmaa


The problem with democracy is that the most popular person would be selected to the head of the state. And that's why Hungarian prime minister can work against rest of European Union. The most problematic thing is that if we want to use censorship against those persons, we might make them more popular than without censorship. And the thing, what makes them so popular is, that they have straight principles, how to handle things and make their nation proud. And why people would not be allowed to be proud of their nation and history? Every nation has right to be proud, but that would be very devastating, because of the nationalism have sometimes turned to militarism and totalitarianism. There have been writings that left-wing persons are working against democracy, and this is not very far away from the truth.


When we are thinking about socialistic, or "realistic socialistic" governments, they are always worked against democracy and destroyed the opposition with massive police actions. And this has been raised the hardcore militarism in the visible sign of the politics of Eastern side nations during the communist era. The problem of the relationship with those nationalist politicians, who are grown in communistic states is, that if rest of the EU would kick them off, that would give more water to their wheels because they would claim, that EU and the elite of EU would kick them of this community.


This is what some of those populists want. If the EU would tolerate and accept their behavior, that would cause the situation, that those politicians must divorce from EU by them self. They must make the first movement in this question, and of course, that would be quite embarrassing for the populists. When we are talking about the way of making decisions in EU, there would always be mentioned the word "elite", what is used in the negative or positive way, depending on the writer's relationship with power. If the writer has the positive relationship with the way to make decisions in the EU, would this person use this world as the positive way, and claim that every person, who sits in the parliament of EU, is some kind of specialist.


If the relationship with the EU is not good, the term "elite" would be used about the isolated financial groups, what are ruling the economy in this area. But when we are thinking about the way, where police would be used against the people, who protest against EU, would we face the situation, where we act like some Soviet Union, when the ally doesn't please it. And if we would use force against the persons, who protest, we would become similar than some NKVD chief, who murdered millions of people, because comrade Stalin was thought, that they were against the communistic way to think, that proletarian dictatorship was the only right way to make world socialistic paradise.


And sometimes I would think, that would we be proud if we keep EU existed with using power. This is the very tricky question because many man and woman want to be "big boss in the small country", and of course, Russia what have very much nuclear weapons is very good "police" for some nations domestic politics. And somebody, who are defending democracy have opinions, that the only right opinion about every question. And the people, who are protecting the freedom of speech have sometimes become the worst limiters of freedom of speech and publishing.

Sources:

https://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/ulkomaat/artikkeli/kommentti-orban-on-eu-n-mutapainissa-niskan-paalla/6931134#gs.nbco7Ro

Picture I

http://www.turituri.com/wp-content/uploads/budapest-parliamentwith-reflection-in-danube-image-id-176965334-1424439725-KDcO.jpg

luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/06/03/what-is-the-problem-with-democracy/


https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

The problem of Russian military aviation and Soyuz 1 incident in 1968 (Cosmonaut Vladimir Komarov death),

Soyuz launch at Baikonur
(Picture I)

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-problem-of-russian-military.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The major problem of Russian technology is was bureaucracy. Also, old-fashion military tradition makes sometimes the to confess that the innovation team has made mistakes. This means, that if there were some mistakes in equipment,  were not dared to tell the leaders of the project. This caused the death of some cosmonauts, and at least one case the reason, why the parachute have not the reason was that the box of the parachute was too big in its space. And that caused the death of cosmonaut Vladimir Komarov (1927-1967), who crashed on the ground with 250 kilometers per hour in 1967.

Picture II

There were some things, what caused the rumors that Komarov was murdered. First was that this man claimed to curse the Soviet leaders while dropping, and sometimes somebody has been asked, could Komarov feel or notice that the parachute was not open, or did somebody in control center told that to Komarov? But this kind of things are rumors, what are was not sent about many historical accidents. The case of Komarov made many people think that "how many cosmonauts were lost in space?". There are many stories in Russia, that some of those men, who sent to the sky ever returned. But when we are thinking about Soyuz program, we must notice that over 300 technical failures in one capsule Soyuz 7K-OK were not very good achievement from those engineers.

Soyuz I wreck
(Picture III)

And of course, the handling of the parachute was not like, what it should be. When Komarov went to capsule he said, that he was not want to risk Yuri Gagarin's (1934-1968) life. In that mission, Gagarin was as backup crew. But in this case, I must ask did Komarov afraid because of the life of Gagarin? And then the parachute failed in the last moments of that flight. There is one remarkable thing: also Gagarin died in the airplane accident during routine mission short after Komarov's death.

Vladimir Komarov
(1927-1967)

His MiG fighter was hit the ground in the middle of routine maneuver and Gagarin didn't send any emergency call, and there were rumors that this cosmonaut committed suicide in 1968. But this sad accident of Komarov is was the example of the dangers of authoritarian command in engineering work. The engineers are humans, who make mistakes. And if they don’t dare to tell that there are problems with production, the results will be sooner or later devastating. This is the reason, why the engineering team must talk freely and also dare to confess that they are made mistakes without fear of divorce or execution.

Soyuz capsule
(Picture V)

The most dangerous situation would be that somebody is hiding some errors in the product. And the Russian authoritative government, what would give punishments very easily would cause the situation, where rumors of assassinations keep the mouth shut by was errors like wrong size parachute because that would make the product the production slower, and the timetables would not match. This might cause the death of Komarov, and the death of this man was the accident, what was the reason for many mistakes in the process, where parachute of the Soyuz one was ordered. And only one question stays on the air: why that parachute was not denied and the spacecraft staff sends it back to the factory? And why the size of the room of parachute was not sent to the factory? Those questions still remain above Soyuz 1.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_1

http://www.spacesafetymagazine.com/space-disasters/soyuz-1/

https://vintagespace.wordpress.com/2012/01/13/soyuz-1-falling-to-earth/


Picture I

https://vintagespace.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/soyuz-launch.jpg

Picture II

https://i1.wp.com/www.xadara.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/509px-Soyuz-1-patch.png?resize=300%2C283

Picture III

https://strela-watch.de/wp-content/uploads/STRELA/blog/Vladimir_Komarov_Soyuz1_Crash_CCCP_0.jpg

Picture IV

https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2011/05/03/komorovportrait_custom-d2ea4d3fa9590ca676f1ca36d68fc94c56f81140-s300-c85.jpg

Picture V

http://www.spacesafetymagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/early-soyuz-capsule.gif

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-problem-of-russian-military.html

What is the difference between Fixed mindset and Growth mindset?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

30 years ago Dr. Carol Dweck and her students thought about the attitude of failure. And during this workshop, they created two kinds of mindsets, what will tell what is the attitude of failure. They created two ways or routes to handle situations, that some work or mission would be some kind failure. Those routes were fixed and growth mindset, what might first look like the same thing, but they are the totally different way to think.


The fixed mindset is the way to think that every affection of the people is stable. When somebody is intelligent, this would continue end of this person’s life. Those persons who have fixed mindset think that when they are graduated from some university or another educational school, they would be like some statues or lighthouses in the sea.


They think that they are only ones, who have those skills, and all the world stands on their shoulder. The problem of that attitude is that those persons think, that everybody is like they are. The skills what they are learned are stable. And this is the wrong way to think. If we are thinking about the skills like programming languages, people might forget them, if they do something else in their career. They would not need to learn anything new, and those people think, that they would not change or they cannot modify their skills or affections.


So for those persons, the attitude of failure is absolutely negative. And that would be stressful for some people. If the people who have fixed mindset has the attitude, that if the person fails, the new one would get to the place immediately. And the person who made the failure must not let to fix their errors. This is, of course, the extreme example of that attitude. At the beginning of next parts of the text, I must say that the grown mindset is not always positive, and if the person is thin, while being young, and stops physical education, would the results be something, what this person doesn’t want.


Grown mindset means that the persons think that failure is meant for growing person. In this way to think the most important thing is that people believe that every affection in the personality can modify by the personal self. If the leading way to think in the person’s head is that if the person fails something, can this person get the needed skills from somewhere, and for that kind of person failures make them stronger.


And here I mean stronger by any means. If the person would kick off the job because this person would not have skills in the job, would the person who has grown mindset ask for courses, where can get needed skills. The term grown mindset would mean also, that the person would be little bit fat, what makes the social problem, but the person would modify the personal body and then get social acceptance. In this case, the person would modify the affection, that he or she would not like.


In the grown mindset would the person realize that everything in the life is the big picture. The good skills are not stable. And the person must update the skills of anything. But if the healthiness of the person is bad, the work would change as hell by other reasons. Even the best programming skills would not make the person productive if that programmer has cardiac problems. Or if the person is unhappy, the work doesn’t advance. The happiness in home and workplace are the best combination, what the employer can imagine. But if the person afraid to go to work, would that cause, that all projects would fail. Also, the pressure at home causes problems in everywhere. Happiness increases productivity.

https://www.mindsetworks.com/science/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-is-difference-between-fixed.html

The problems of SETI-program

Kimmo Huosionmaa

SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) program is one of the most dangerous programs in our planet. Even if we haven't get contact or signal from extraterrestrial intelligence, the telescopes might get it in next night. Or they can get contact beyond 1000 years. Some people think that waiting for a contact is like waiting for a train or something like that. SETI program is not so simple because we can't know when the first message is coming.

Or does it come in our lifetime? When we are talking about that project. If we will get the signal from other civilization, but we might ever take contact to those civilizations. They might be so far there, that we ever can't message together because the civilization might be in Andromeda galaxy. That proves the existence of alien civilization, but that doesn't mean that this civilization has ever meanings for us. That civilization would be so far, that even if they jump in their UFO:s right now, our sun would be turned a red giant before they arrive.

Problems of SETI program is that if we will get contact to other civilization, we might get under attack. But if we use the right technology we can hide our existence from aliens. We can cover our entire planet holograms, what makes humanoids to believe that our civilization does not exist. And of course, radio telescopes might use as a gigantic ECM-system, what makes our planet seem like there will not find any interesting. The system will be sent back waves to humanoids transmission, that they can’t see our planet's surface with radar and they can’t get repulses in their telescopes.  

That radiation makes the radio waves or their echoes weak, that they can’t go back to the transmitter. Or otherwise the signals what will be sent back to humanoids would be so powerful that they would think that this will be gigantic super earth, there will be no life forms exist. But this scenario is pure fiction if published information is true.

But everybody knows that federal authorities are not talking true all the time. SETI is one of the most complicated missions on Earth science community. If you want to investigate extraterrestrial civilizations you have nothing where to start. There is not even one single message what is proven that is coming from another star. If somebody believes extraterrestrial intelligence, that does not mean that he or she believes little green men, or why that person wouldn't believe that some people might have green skin. There is one great “if" in those scenarios.

If somebody has put the genetic what causes photosynthesis in the flora to human DNA, that will make the human skin transformation to green. But what kind of technology that speculative humanoid civilization might have. They might have the technology to create “wormholes", but the problem with wormhole travel is that that kind of stuff will need two black holes, what will put resonate to same frequency, and after that those black holes must be separated and another will pull to the place, where that civilization wants to travel. That will take very long time for that civilization, and success of that project can see until the trip is done. That’s why aliens must be sure that there is something interesting.

Otherwise, the trip is made for nothing. And it can take even thousands of years. But there is always artist’s freedom to use imagination about other civilizations. They might have gigantic Dyson spheres, where could be floating “island” in the middle of that colossal ship, what might be the size of a planet. That island would be in the area, where is not gravitation field, and that area might use for production, what needs absolute zero-gravity condition. There might be nano-technological and biotechnological research areas, where they create nano-robots and other that kind of stuff.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/