Could white holes exist?

Could white holes exist, and why can't we see them? Mathematically, white holes or anti-black holes exist, but they are extremely unstable. The thing is that the white hole might misunderstand some of those visions. A white hole is theoretically the opposite of a black hole. It's the point where the material comes out of the wormhole that is the quantum energy channel through spacetime. The white hole has singularity, as well as black holes, do, but the white hole acts oppositely to black holes.

Time dilation stops time at the point of the white hole. That means we can only see flashes, and then we would travel through that thing in time. So when particles come out of the wormhole, they release their extra energy as a shockwave that we can see as a flash.

"White holes are theoretical cosmic regions that function in an opposite way to black holes. (Image credit: Future/Adam Smith)" (Space.com/Could white holes actually exist?)

(Space.com/Could white holes actually exist?)

The idea of a wormhole is that there is a quantum tornado in space. And there is a quantum vacuum ahead of objects that travel in that "tube". That means all particles, including photons, travel at the same speed in that strange phenomenon called a wormhole or Einstein-Rose bridge. Wormholes follow the principle of quantum entanglement. And information can travel through those energy bridges only if one side is at a higher energy level than the other.

The white hole pushes material away from the hole, and the point where the speed of that material that travels in a wormhole decreases below the speed of light is the point where the wormhole ends. So at that point, the matter again reaches the speed of light. And the thing is that time is also frozen at the point of the white hole.

If we think that time is a river, a white hole is like a stone in that river. A river called time takes all matter with it. And we can see that stone only once. And maybe the flash of the supernova is the moment when a white hole opens in spacetime. And that means we could see that thing only once.

The white hole interacts in a similar way as black holes, and at the point where the speed of matter is the speed of light, time is frozen. Time dilation stops time at that moment. When matter comes out of a white hole, it causes a shockwave that is seen as a flash.

So because time is frozen at the end of a wormhole, we might say that white holes are frozen at a certain point in spacetime. So the white hole is in a stable position, but time travels around it. When we think about white holes from the point of view of an observer who stands in a regular universe, the white hole is just a flash in spacetime. That means a white hole exists, but it exists at a certain point in spacetime.

https://www.space.com/could-white-holes-exist-space-mysteries

Tachyon and time reverse.

 

Is tachyon particle in WARP-bubble? Or is it rather a phenomenon than a particle? Or is tachyon only wave motion that travels just behind neutrino or some other particle? 

There is the possibility that the hypothetical tachyon particle does not exist. Or time-traveling tachyon particles do not exist. 

It's possible. That all hypothetical tachyons are not transporting information back in time. Or even if those particles transport information to the past, that information cannot interact with other particles. In that case, the faster-than-light particles are traveling back in time, but they cannot send their information to other particles. 

The reason for that is linear spacetime model causes a situation where regular, slower-than-light particles are traveling forward in time. And the hypothetical faster-than-light particle is traveling back in time. So those particles are like in elevators where another particle is traveling down, and another is traveling up. 

If tachyons are traveling back in time there is the possibility that interaction between tachyons and other particles is so short that there is no time to detect that interaction. But if that thing is real and tachyons are traveling back in time. That forms a model where dark energy comes from tachyons. 

There is also the possibility that those hypothetical particles exist. But they just cannot interact with the material. So is the ability for interaction requirement for existence. 

There is the possibility that the hypothetical tachyon particle does not exist. Or time-traveling tachyon particles does not exist. There is also the possibility that those hypothetical particles exist. But they just cannot interact with the material. So is the ability for interaction requirement for existence. 

But the fact is clear nobody has seen tachyon yet. And maybe that particle does not exist. If tachyon exists that particle makes it possible to send information to the past. 

Proving the influence of that thing is very difficult. Because even if we send information the receiver must have the ability and be willing to follow that information. Then if that information causes some reaction. The past has always been to us. So it's hard to prove the success of that information transfer. 

And the reason for that is that. When in this hypothetical case, we send information to the past. The effect that this information cause is that the new reality replaces the old one. So the new reality stands from the point where that information is received. 

But that new reality has always been similar to us. So the reality is substance, and time and dimension are attributes. Two substances cannot share the same attribute. So there cannot be two realities at the same time. In the same dimension. And at one point in spacetime can be only one reality. 

But then we must realize another thing. If tachyons are faster-than-light particles they should be in the fourth dimension. So the shape of the tachyon in our third dimension could be the missing quantum-size black hole. The idea is that the tachyon's energy level is so high that it cannot interact with other materials. And that means it's out of our universe. 

Is tachyon particle in WARP-bubble? Or is it rather a phenomenon than a particle? Or is tachyon only wave motion that travels just behind neutrino or some other particle? 

In some models, a tachyon is a so high-energy particle that the quantum field around it forms WARP-bubble around that particle. That thing causes the situation where tachyon can travel faster than light. So in some models, a tachyon is only an electron or neutrino that's energy level is so high that it can travel faster than light in a short moment. Then that particle transforms into a photon and a Higgs boson. But there can be some kind of medium between the photon and the Higgs boson. So that means when the tachyon starts to interact it changes to some other particle. In that model, the tachyon is the particle with the lowest energy level in the fourth dimension. 

There is a couple of theories about the shape of the tachyon. 

*Tachyon does not exist as a particle. That means a tachyon could be some structure or phenomenon rather than a particle. So that means gravitons are particles with extremely high energy levels rather than fast-moving particles. 

*Tachyon could be flat or it's the bite of wave movement. So that means tachyon is not a particle in the form we know it. 

*In some theories tachyons are the same thing as gravitons. That means tachyons could be the source of gravitation waves. 

*In that model gravitational wave would be the channel that is forming when the tachyon travels in the universe. Or if the tachyon is the same thing as graviton gravitational waves are the tornado-shaped structure. That is forming in those quantum-size black holes. One of the most remarkable things is that graviton, tachyon, and quantum-size black holes are all hypothetical things. 

*Tachyon exists only in limited circumstances. That means tachyons could exist, as an example in black holes behind the event horizon. In some theories, a particle transforms into a tachyon when it crosses the event horizon. 

*Or in tachyon can form when some particles. Like neutrino is following some other particle that travels near the speed of light. In that case, the neutrino forms the cone where light can travel faster than other places in the universe. 

*There is a possibility that tachyons are forming in miniature voids in the universe. That thing means that when neutrino or some other particle travels in the void. And there is hitting wave movement that thing can form a situation where the neutrino's speed rises faster than it should. And that causes short-term crossing of the speed of light. And that time could be about zeptosecond class. 

*Tachyon could be the thing that is traveling inside particles or neutrinos. If the particle is like a whisk. And there is some other particle inside that cover-particle and that sub-particle moves ahead. That thing can form a tachyon. 

*So tachyon exists only short time. And that's why it's almost impossible to detect. In some visions, a tachyon is the forward-moving wave movement that leaves Higgs boson when its speed is slowing. 

*Tachyons can be a situation where the particles like photons or Higgs bosons spin in the direction where those particles are moving. That means tachyon is a rather phenomenon than a particle. 

But when we think of graviton as time traveling particle we face one remarkable thing. If we want to prove time reverse, we are in very big trouble. We must prove that information that we send changed something in history. But history always exists for us. And even if we change something in history, that thing always exists for us. So we cannot prove that we changed history. 

Albert Einstein predicted that tachyons allow transmitting information backward in time. The thing, that makes this problematic is that if we send information back in time. How can we prove that the information we send, caused some kind of effect? The past and its effect always exist on us. 

https://www.space.com/tachyon-time-travel-relativity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-symmetry

https://shorttextsofoldscholars.blogspot.com/

Can a cat be dead and alive at the same time?

Image: Wikipedia:Scrödinger's cat

If information ever exists. It cannot either vanish. If something vanishes it requires that at least information about that object exists. If something never exists. It cannot either vanish because vanishing requires existence...

The reason for that is simple. Only existing things can vanish. 

If we are thinking about Schrödinger's cat. And the box where that cat is put where the cat is in a position where it cannot release without killing it, we can say that at the same time cat is dead and alive. But the fact is that the answer to the question is the cat is dead or is it alive requires another type of logic. The particle can be in two places at the same time. Because of quantum superposition. But the particle can have only one existence if it will have existed. 

In logical quantum mechanics, the superposition means that the particle is in two places horizontally. But the energy level of those particles can be different. And that means the particles can be vertically at different levels. 

But if the particle is dead. It doesn't have existence. And that means the particle is meaningless. 

In information theory, the information cannot vanish. But if the observer doesn't have information. That makes information non-existent. Getting information makes it existent. But if the observer doesn't never get information about the things like a cat. The cat is dead.

 Because information never existed. It cannot either vanish. 

Information can change its form. in system theory, this means. The cat that carries information is living. And when the cat delivers its information it is dead. So if the cat serves some system as the messenger which carries some USB stick between two computer centers. That means the cat lives until it delivers the USB stick. 

If we think like that anything that means something to the system is alive. And if the cat doesn't have a message or it just walks on the streets it's dead. So living means that things have some kind of meaning to other actors. 

But information theory describes the existence that an object doesn't have the form of to subject before the subject sees that object. So the cat is dead for a person until that actor gets knowledge about the cat's existence. We all know that in our house can be a cat. But we cannot see it and because the cat doesn't cause any actions to us or it doesn't give any markings to our calendars that means the cat is dead. 

That way thinking only things that we know and things that causes interactions are alive. The form of the information can be virtual. That means even if the cat. That someday carried messages but then escaped and the observer never sees it again the cat is alive in its virtual form. Observers can discuss the missing cat. And that makes the cat still alive. Even without straight contact with the observer. The cat remains alive in the virtual mode in the memories of those people. 

So the cat's living or existence can be stronger or weaker. It depends on how often we see it, and how often we talk about that thing. Maybe we will tell stories of the lost cat to our grandchildren. And that keeps it alive in our memories or the virtual world if we want to call memories virtual projection. But memories are forming of real things. That means those tales about that cat are weaker existence than seeing a cat straight. Or touching it. 

Being alive=Being exists. 

Being exist= actor can measure an object. 

And then the actors know the object. 

Knowledge brings the object to reality. 

That means until we measure or touch the cat. It would not turn into reality. 

That is one interesting thing. Before a person sees a cat it is dead because it is not part of reality. That means the cat or particle can be at the same time in two states but those states cannot be too far from each other. The cat cannot be alive and dead at the same time. That is a paradox as I wrote earlier. 

But a cat can be alive in virtual and physical existing modes. We can see the cat and tell about it to our mate, who stands near us. That means the cat has two states virtual and real to the system. But for individual actors, the cat can have only one state. They see cats and measure or they cannot see them. 

https://www.sciencealert.com/reality-doesn-t-exist-until-we-measure-it-quantum-experiment-confirms

The system slides from a conditional state to an absolute state. 

Conditional state>>>>>Information spreds>>>>>>>>>>Absolute state

Conditional state

Individuals of the entirety get information about the cat. 

Information spreads

In absolute state, every participant of entirety knows about the cat. 

The system slides from a conditional state to an absolute state. When the cat or information is between the states. It can have this conditional state. But sooner or later, the information must reach a stable state. Or if the cat falls between states it has the absolute state. The fall means that the absolute state changes very fast. But when the cat reaches the floor. It would reach the minimum energy level or state. 

"Being alive" for an object means that the actor can know about it. The knowledge of the actor turns it alive. 

"Maybe mode" is the mode where the same time cat is alive and dead at the same time. But when information spread in the system the system turns to Yes/No mode. 

That thing requires that there are multiple independent actors in the system. The system slides from the conditional state to the absolute model. 

When the first actors in entirety get knowledge of the cat's existence. There is the medium where the entirety has at the same time two states. But then the system will slide from the conditional mode or state to the absolute mode. When the system is in its absolute state form, the cat is dead or alive not dead and alive. 

An actor can be an individual. Or it can be a group of individual actors. 

All systems contain multiple actors. And if we think that group of people is searching for the cat and one sees it. Then that individual tells that thing to another participant that thing causes that cat to have two states virtual and physical in the system where are multiple actors. But the individual actor the cat is real or virtual. Or the actor doesn't know the existence of the cat. And that means the cat is dead. 

The actor can have three forms. Two of them are where the observer realizes its existence. And one form where observers don't know the existence of the actor. That is the dark mode that is hidden from actors. 

*Virtual form

*Physical form

*If nobody knows the existence of the actor, he's dead. 

The knowledge makes the object dead or alive. Being dead and alive are black and white. The actor can know the existence of the cat. Or the actor doesn't know that thing so the cat is dead. If the actor hears about the cat that thing makes it alive in virtual mode. When a person sees cats' traces. That will bring the knowledge of its existence stronger. And that will turn it more existing and more living than just talking about it. 

But a cat cannot be dead and alive at the same time. When people are talking about cats it turns alive. Because existing things are living things. The cat's existence can be virtual when somebody just describes the cat to others. Or it can be physical when the actor touches the cat. But in both cases cat is alive. The reason for that is that requirement for a thing's existence is that the observer becomes conscious of its existence. If a person doesn't know about its existence the thing is dead. The existence means that the cat is alive. 

When we think that a cat is dead or alive. We must say that for the system that is the entirety of multiple actors. The cat can be dead or alive. The individual actors can have different knowledge about the existence of the cat. In that stage, the system is in maybe mode. But when information about that cat's existence spreads. That system will turn to the mode. That allows it to get knowledge about the existence of the cat. 

The term dead cat means a cat whose existence is not known. Knowing the existence of the cat makes it alive. The cat cannot be dead and alive at the same time. The reason for that is simple we know that cat exists or we don't know a cat's existence. We cannot know and not know the existence of the cat at the same time. 

https://www.sciencealert.com/dont-let-yourself-get-tangled-up-by-these-4-quantum-mechanics-misconceptions

https://fromplatoscavetoreality.blogspot.com/

There is the possibility that the anti-universe where time moves backward exists.

Image 1: 

Did an anti-universe where time runs backward exist before our universe? The fact is this. If that universe exists it advances in an opposite way to our universe. That anti-universe forms as cold. And then it will start to warm, and finally, it will turn too hot for the particle. 

So the intensive heat of that anti-universe will destroy particles and turn them into wave movement before it will fall into a giant black hole. Because that black hole will stay in absolute emptiness it starts to erupt. And that eruption forms the new Big Bang. 

If there was a universe before our universe. The ultimate fate of that universe must be the Big Crunch. 

That thing means that the universe and anti-universe could alternate. So if there was a universe before our universe, the ultimate fate of that universe would be the Big Crunch. That thing means that the anti-universe was before our universe. 

There is the possibility that when the universe will start to fall before the Big Crunch. The time would start to travel backward. The anti-universe will also face a Cig Crunch if that thing is exist. During the Big Crunch, the universe will turn to extremely high temperatures. 

The idea of the anti-universe where time runs backward is interesting. As I wrote before there is the possibility that the universe forms another universe or a giant quantum bubble. The energy would travel to the middle of the universe. 

And that means the time travels backward in that anti-universe. The anti-universe can explain dark matter. The antimatter universe is similar to our universe. But the material that forms the antimatter universe is mirror material. When antimatter impacts material. That causes annihilation. 

The entire material and antimatter both turn to energy. So if the antimatter universe impacts our universe that causes the ultimate end of both universes. In some very rare ideas, the Big Bang was the antimatter annihilation. If the antimatter galaxy hits the material galaxy that causes the ultimate destruction. One gram of antimatter would detonate the entire Earth. So what if the galaxy-size antimatter clouds will impact? 

Image 2: The Big Crunch. The vertical axis can be considered to be the expansion or the contraction with time. During expansion, time moves forward, and during the Big Crunch, time moves backward

But in the anti-universe energy flows to the center of that universe. And that thing causes the time travels backward if we think that time is energy. 

When the expansion of our universe causes, the energy level of the universe is decreasing. The energy flow in the anti-universe would make the energy level in that anti-universe rise. That means the ultimate fate of that hypothetical universe is the big crunch. Or actually, that hypothetical universe advances backward than our universe.

Because the electromagnetic wave movement hits the quantum bubble of the anti-universe that thing sends that wave movement to the middle of that anti-universe. And that thing will increase the mass of that universe. That thing causes a gravitational effect that pulls the mass and energy together. So in the distant future. That anti-universe would turn to extreme hot plasma. And then the plasma falls into the black hole. And when the black hole is in the middle of emptiness it explodes. 

This thing causes interesting vision. If there is a quantum bubble that sends wave movement to the middle of it and forms the black hole. The time is traveling backward in that bubble. And then, there is a possibility that there is a cut in energy flow. That causes the black hole in the middle of the quantum bubble explodes. 

Erupting a black hole would send the expanding material ball against that falling energy. So if the eruption of the black hole is strong enough that thing forms the new Big Bang. Because the gravitation of that new universe is dominating.

But the radiation pushes the original quantum field outside that can form two layer-universe. In the inner ball, time moves as it moves in our universe. But between the most out and inner quantum bubble time travels backward. 

The idea of the universe where time moves forward, but what is surrounding the area where time moves backward might seem very interesting or special. But as we know, time moves backward in the black holes. The reason for that is that the wave movement moves to the center of the black hole. 

In the cases like universe-size quantum fields, the electromagnetic wave movement acts like it acts when it hits to steel ball. The radiation starts to flow around the ball. And then the ball conducts part of that radiation in the middle of the ball. That thing requires that there is an electromagnetic vacuum in the quantum ball. 

There is the possibility that this kind of area is existing also in our universe. The requirement is that the radiation falls into that bubble. And the rising energy level will reload the energy that material loses when the universe expands. That kind of thing can make the material young again. 

https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a39745160/anti-universe-running-backward-in-time/

https://www.rankred.com/anti-universe-exist-before-big-bang/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe

Image 1: https://www.rankred.com/anti-universe-exist-before-big-bang/

Image 2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe

I think, therefore I am (René Descartes)

"Thinking is existence"

Kimmo Huosionmaa


http://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/p/i-think-therefore-i-am-rene-descartes.html

Those very well known words of the famous philosopher René Descartes are also very mysterious, and when we are thinking about the personality of this man, we might ask, what he meant, when he said or wrote those very famous words? Did he mean, that the thinking proved that he was alive or existed? That means Descartes was thought something very deep in his head. And when we are trying to analyze the origin of those words, we might want to know, was Descartes very tired?  Or was he in some bar, or talking with another person? And did this another person wrote those words to paper, because he or she understood the deep philosophy about those words. This is the reason, why this text is actually philosophical writing about those famous words, what are one of the most well-known words, what any philosopher has ever said.


But there is another way to close those words, and this is that Descartes actually was very careful in his private relationships, and avoided to talk deep things with opponents, who might modify or tell those things selectively to the people, who they would not be meant. I think that Descartes meant that writing would save his head sometimes because that allows proving the words to the officials. Of course, Descartes warned other people that the unthinkable talking would sometimes cost his head, but because he spoke too much all the time, would he like to write his thoughts to the paper, because that eliminated the possibility to tell selective parts of those thoughts for other persons.


I think that René as I sometimes call this philosopher was not the very impressive man, and because he wrote his ideas to the paper, would other persons see the things, what he thought. All thought must be seen better than some parts of those thoughts. During his life, there might be millions of words, what this man, who was Frenchman and lived in Sweden have said, and sometimes those persons met the man or woman, who took only two words of this man's work, and then they delivered those words to everybody.


That would have seemed quite interesting in the eyes of Descartes because two words don't make anybody worse than they really are. We have all been children, and in that time, we have said many words, what were not clever. But if somebody says, that I saw two unthinkable words at the age of 12, I would think that person would be some way different than the normal person. Those kinds of persons sometimes come to the table of the men like Descartes. They would not remember anything than those two words, and that seems very nice in their own eyes.


But when people are coming to the age of 43, they would say also something else, than just those two words. This is the thing, what might be interesting in the mind of René Descartes. Those words were not everything, what he said even in those ages, and when we are thinking about the famous words  "I think, therefore I am", we should think, does Descartes say those words to the person, who suspected his right to be in somewhere like University?


Or is he the right person for his duties? Then this person asks, does Descartes think, that he is clever, he might say, that thinking is the way to show the right to be in the place, where thinkers are studying. Maybe this suspicious person has kept the course book all the time in the command, and then this person would ask Descartes, how he could do the exam.  And then Descartes said, that he put the paper his own ideas. This is one way to think about the place in the society.


Because some people have existed, they have right to be in the places, where they have made the pass-test, what has been accepted. When we are thinking about the University, there would be millions of people, whoever writes their own ideas. They just lend the books from the library and then copy those thoughts from the books to their works.  René Descartes is the very interesting person, and he is very good character both fictional and scientific writings. And the words are free, and some writer would write the book, where the main character would be this famous philosopher. This is free land, and people have right to use their own words in the writings. In philosophy is no need to proof the words what have been written, what gives the freedom for making the texts, and tell our opinions for other persons.

I think I exist, and if I'm punished for my texts, I exist for some powerful man

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/i-think-i-am-existed.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

René Descartes said once, that if the human being thinks that makes this person existed. In his lifetime, normal or ordinary people did not exist for rulers of the nations. And everything, that said against the king or rulers was the straight attack against the god. If we think this way, everybody who says something against rulers exists only when they are punished.


When we are following the way of thinking, what Descartes followed, we must say that if somebody makes texts or makes speeches, what means nothing, we must ask a question "why this person would punish"? If writing means nothing, the consequences must be nothing? So what in some writings or speeches is so harmful, that the king gives the order to arrest that text maker. Why poor philosopher causes the situation, that all nation must change the laws in the country?


When people make the own writings,  this person must have the capacity to think about those things. And that kind of writings might be harmful to people, that believe that person must keep quiet when somebody would not ask something about that person. Only persons who have right to speak or write something, are superiority officers. And the role of henchmen is to keep their mouth shut, when their leaders are speaking.


When the person raises to a very high-rank official, would the orders, what this person gives become so-called common orders. This might cause some misunderstandings because that kind of person is above everything. Normal man or woman can't say or do anything, what might harm that superiority official.


And if some worker would say something bad about this very high-rank businessman, would that cause the situation, that this person must step down from the tower, and say something about this case to that worker. In this case would look very funny, that some main director of enterprise corporation kicks this worker off. And in this case, would happen that the director would give common orders, that the doors of the company will be closed for the person, who is from some city or state. This means that the director wants to make generic orders for hiring the position. Those high ranking officials of the private or public sectors might sometimes hide behind orders, what are given to all industry. This means, that this person would just walk away if somebody says or does something bad about that person who might be king of the state.


Soon comes to the orders to kick off 3000 persons from their working place, because somebody said that the slips, what this boss used was not very good looking. So that kind of thing might cause the situation, that thousands of workers would kick off or something like that would happen. This is how powerful men are working in real life. And also everybody, who writes about those things, should be quiet because they would not find the jobs from those companies.

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/i-think-i-am-existed.html

The little writing about existence.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-little-writing-about-existence.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-little-writing-about-existence.html