Why are we obsessed with AI?

People are obsessed with AI. The question is: why? The answer can stay in our society. We have the attitude that everything must happen fast. That's why we rather use the Internet than books. There are philosophers, home thinkers, etc, who say that we should go to the library and read books. But when we are in working life we have no time to go to the library and then find things. That we need.  If somebody wants people like students to go to the library and read books they must give time for that. 

When we are at work we must be effective. We have no time to go to the library to search for books, and then write some philosophical thoughts about them. People ask why we give our right to think to AI. The answer is that AI makes everything more effective. If we want to be creative that means we are not effective. If we want to become philosophers we must not expect that our society accepts that thing. 

When we think of something alone we are not social and effective. We are alone with our thoughts. And that is not what society expects us to do. Society wants us to make results. When we write something that takes time. And if we use AI we can make much more texts. Quantity replaces quality. Nobody respects the text that we make ourselves using our own words. People respect models that some other person made. 

Those models make it possible to make more texts and the next step is AI. There is no time to make offers by using your own words. The effectiveness means that people use some models. Lots of offers are better than one that a person makes, using their own words. 

When somebody needs information that means information is needed right in the moment. On our working day, we don't even have time to ask the person who sits next to us that person's name. We don't have time to think about things. And another thing that we have is fear. What if we give a wrong answer? 

That is one of the worst fears in modern life. So if we don't have time to think about things, we don't dare to answer. Using our words, and introducing our own ideas. AI is similar to some poem books. We can take a poem book. And then search for some impressive words and copy them to the text. The next step is the use of AI.

We must use things like AI tools. The AI tool is like a secretary that makes our speeches and other official texts. So we can go in front of people and say, here I read a paper that my secretary has written. That offers the escape door to us. If there is a mistake we can blame our secretaries for that thing.  

The same way, if we make referrals about articles and books that we read, those words might be wise. That's true. But those words are not our own words. Maybe Socrates was a very famous and wise man. But that person wrote his own ideas and words. When we make a speech to our ceremonies we should write our own texts. 

I think that people like Socrates and Plato were very intelligent. But if we just loan those texts, and copy them we cannot find new Socrateses. We cannot find a new philosophy. And what we need is the time to think and the time to handle and observe our thoughts. We are so busy that we have no time to go to the library, and read books. If we are wrong we would face blame. We must have time to go to the Gym after work. We must have time to be social. And we must have time to do many things. 

But then we must realize. That we have no time to sit and read. If we want to go to the library to read books we must find time to do that thing. 

If we buy a book or borrow it. But we have no time to read it. 

That book doesn't offer a very big advance in our knowledge. If we want to get information and use it we must open that book or database etc. And then our mind must be ready to receive that data. 

We don't have time to think about things and the consequences of our work. If we don't dare to write things that we think we cannot find new Socrates and other philosophers. If everything that we write and introduce must be so scientifically proven we should realize that those things don't bring advances. 

https://futurism.com/chatgpt-mental-health-crises

Is it safe to stand on a giant's shoulders?

If we want to be prime movers we must dare to think independently. The man named Sir Isaac Newton was the man who created the first gravitational theory. Newton also explained that light had two forms particle and wave motion. But we forget one thing. 

When Newton started his career, there were no gravitational theories and Newtonian mechanics. Being a prime mover makes it possible that a person makes mistakes. But if the person is successful. That brings gold and glory to that person. And guess how many errors Newton made before he published some of his theories?

The key element in philosophy is just to learn to ask "why?".  We can always copy texts written by Popper or Aristotle. But when we try to create something new. We must dare to write something. That some famous philosophers did not write earlier. There is one thing that we must understand. Even the most famous philosophers once wrote their first text. 

Sir Isaac Newton said he made great things because he stood on the giant's shoulders. Then we might ask how safe is to stand on a giant's shoulder. Should we rather follow other people? Should we always follow other people's thoughts? 

Or repeat other people's ideas rather than make our ideas? So if we want to make something great, like some new theory we must dare to stand on the giant's shoulder. Maybe our ideas are sometimes unpractical. Or maybe, they are far away from possible. 

And that means people are telling us that our idea is not working. Or our new idea is not suitable for mass production. But otherwise, those ideas were ours. They were and are something that came to my mind. When we think about safe models like writing some other people's ideas some other people like my own teachers could or some other philosophers might ask, "should I loan Plato's book, or should I read your thoughts?". 

The fact is that I was in the philosophy course, and if I wanted to pass that course, I must write my ideas. I know that everybody can copy texts made by Aristotle, Newton, or Voltaire. But fewer people can write their own opinions and justify them by using accepted rhetoric. This is the idea of philosophy. What if Newton thought that he must follow other people's texts? And what if that man just summarized them? 

The fact is that nobody ever heard of Sir Isaac Newton, the man who invented Newton's telescope, gravitation, and derivative-integral calculations. Nobody ever heard the idea that the universe is like a clock and God would not willingly intervene in what's going on here. Without being willing to make their texts, men and women like Newton would be the only man on earth. 

When we are thinking about people who sympathize with the Russian attack on Ukraine. And their connection with vaccine resistance, we can say that vaccines can protect people against biological weapons. But that's only my own opinion. The thing is that the philosophical way to think is different than everyday thinking. philosophical thinking is deeper than regular thinking. And the key question is: does something has some kind of thing that is not open to us? 

The classic example of a philosophical way to think is this. When our professor comes to the class there is a glass of water on his table. Then we must ask a question: is that liquid water? And if there is water, why that glass is on the table? 

When we look at people, who are against their benefit, we must ask about the motive for that kind of behavior. Why did somebody do something? Whose benefit do the anti-vaccine attitudes serve? 

Why that thing causes so big polemics? Why do those things raise so strong opinions? Those things are interesting. 

https://bigthink.com/thinking/shoulders-of-qiants/

Is technological singularity the next step for humanity?

The allegory of the cave is one of the most well-known philosophical examples. The idea is that. If people see only the cave's wall the cave is their entire world. All information that people in the cave get delivered by some other people. That means the goodwill of those people determines what kind of information those people in that cave get. 

So we can say that Plato's Allegory of the cave is the first case of synthetic reality. What differentiates the people in Plato's cave from the people who are serving in the underground nuclear weapon facilities? The fact is that those people who are serving in those underground facilities get also information that other people want to share with them. In the modern nuclear center, high-tech screens have replaced the shadows on the walls. But the set is the same as that cave about 500 B.C. The screen just transmits information to people who are fully isolated. 

Allegory of the cave (Wikipedia)

Internet is the next-generation Plato's cave. If somebody wants that tool would use to deliver filtered and corrupted information. The case that some person would sit in a place where are no windows entire life? The only way how to get information would be a computer. That case would be like Plato's cave allegory. 

The information that this hypothetical person gets. Could be fully controlled. Like the shadows on a cave's walls, the internet would deliver information that might be true or false. The information that this person gets would be true or it could be grotesque. 

 What if we would stay in one building and one room our entire life? What if our only contact with the outer world would be the internet? When we are thinking about theories like synthetic reality, which claims the entire universe is a simulation, we might ask why that thing is done? 

If we would close people in the closed bunker and use the simulated, and synthetic reality. We might claim that those people are Adam and Eve. And the person who created the enhanced or virtual reality is God. In that case, the idea of the simulated or synthetic reality is to train those persons for their ultimate mission. 

The technological singularity is based on implanted neural circuits. Those microchips make the nervous system interact with the internet. And that means the person would not even know what is reality. And what is virtual reality? When we think about movies like "Matrix" where people die in real life, when they die in the virtual life is possible by using the existing technology. The requirement for that kind of thing is that a small explosive device is implanted inside the player's body. 

And when the character that this person controls dies the explosive destroys also the physical player. Or the player sits on an electric chair. And when the player's avatar dies. That activates those electric chairs. When we are thinking of the case that the person is connected to the internet all the life. That person would not even know what real reality looks like. There is one very interesting and the most extreme theory about existence. 

That theory is called the "Simulated universe theory". We know that there is a 50% possibility that this theory is true. But then the thing that fights against that theory is the motive. Why somebody would make that kind of virtual place called the universe? The origin of that theory is in Plato's cave.

The people who would see only the cave. Where they are. Believe, that the shadows of the wall are true. Their entire world would be in that cave. And then the persons who would live in that cave for their entire life would believe that the cave is their entire world. There are many versions of that allegory. And in the modern version, there are people inside the nuclear shelter, deep underground. Those people have not seen the world at all without technical filters.

The internet delivers all information that those people get. That means those people can believe that they are on another planet. All things that they see happen on the screens. 

But we know that reality is reality. 

The idea of the simulated reality is taken from the nuclear command centers. Those extreme underground facilities communicate with surface systems by using extremely secured communication lines. There is introduced an idea that what if somebody will claim that outside is the nuclear war. Then the system shows that personnel the fake film about the launch of the nuclear weapons. 

And then they would get faked information about the highly polluted Earth. The persons who are in that center would get the faked information about the destruction of the civilization. So would they come to the surface for checking that thing? There is an urban legend that some of those facilities tried to launch. And then the entrance of that center was buried. That means that there are people in the underground facility who believe that they are the only people on Earth.

 There are many versions of that urban legend. Some people are born in those underground facilities. And whose only contact with the surface is the internet. Those tales are inspired the philosophical discussions about the people who see only things that other people want to show them. There are many tales and versions of Plato's cave. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegory_of_the_cave

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulated_reality

The perpetual motion machine is the dream of inventors.

What is the perpetual motion machine? It's the machine that recycles 100% of its energy. The perpetual motion machine is impossible on Earth because friction removes energy in the form of heat from the machines. And that means nothing can move forever. 

But perpetual motion machines are interesting philosophical objects. And they are very interesting objects for hypothesis. 

The time crystals are the quantum-size perpetual motion machines. The time crystal is the quantum system. Or the ion line that is closed in the common quantum field. That ion line is wobbling back and forth. And those ions transfer their energy to the quantum field around that line. That quantum system recycles energy through it.

One of the most interesting versions of the energy harvester is the laser ray that jumps between mirrors that reflect 100% of the radiation that hits them. When outcoming radiation hits that laser light it rises that laser rays energy level. And the system can collect that extra energy and then transfer that energy to the electric circuit. The small silicon crystal can use to collect electricity from the back and forth moving laser ray. 

But can we someday make a perpetual motion machine? And why that machine is so interesting. The perpetual motion machine would solve the energy problems of the Earth. The system would act like all other systems. It can get more energy from the radiation or seismic and pressure impulses around it. So the perpetual motion machine that recycles 100% of its energy can harvest energy from around it. And that thing would be the ultimate power source. But it's impossible to make on Earth. The friction is the thing that makes the perpetual motion machine impossible. 

But the thing is that the perpetual motion machine can operate in space in the vacuum outside the atmosphere and gravitational field of Earth. The idea is that there is a wheel that hovers in the middle of the generator. The system could look like a little bit turbine where the energy takers or generators are at the axle without contact with the core. The wheel would harvest the energy of the sun. 

And then it transforms the movement into electricity. The sun's energy will put the wheel to rotate and the minimization of the friction would put the wheel to rotate. And because the system produces electricity. It has something else to do than just rotate. Can we someday make a real perpetual motion machine? Maybe that thing is possible in the future. But still today, the perpetual motion machine is the dream. 

What is the purpose of the meeting between Putin and Trump? (And something about leadership)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are meeting in Helsinki, sometimes we are thinking, what is the purpose of those meeting? Why those men are meeting in Helsinki and if they would not be made any concrete things, why they would travel to this town, and talk together? The problem of those leaders is simple, they need foreign treats, and many of their supporters are in the military industry. That industry need treats for selling their products to other countries.


The purpose of making investigations and developments in those products is to create even more and more superior technology, what would increase the strike capacity of those products. And the advantages of the technology would be guaranteed the markets for new military equipment. And every leader in the world want of course peace, but if they will send their men to war, those persons must tell to mothers of their nations, that their sons were dying in the field.


Presidents and other highest rank politicians need public support for their campaigns, and in the world is one rule: who would pay your salary is the person, who makes decisions, what sings you are singing. And this is why every leader in the world must look strong. If some leader would give another side opportunity to speak before that side would be destroyed, that thing is mentioned as a weakness. Only thing what confesses people is the use of power. Everybody who would not satisfied must be kicked off from work.


Why must the leader tolerate persons, who have different opinions than the leader have?  This is the normal attitude in some talking about leadership. When other people come to meeting the leader would start to tell, what would be next things, what would be done. And after that, this leader would tell, that the decision of this conference is something.


This is, of course, the very nice way to lead, but why this leader calls the meeting if that person would not want to know anything that is different than own ideas? Why this man or woman would not send orders of the action to workplaces and start to work? If the person has made the decision before, the meeting is only a waste of time.


And time is money because those persons need salaries. So why not send the orders to the subleaders and stop playing democracy. The leader is responsible for the decision, and that gives this person the right to make those decisions alone, but in that case, should the report marked that the decisions are made by the leader alone. This is one very interesting point of view of leadership.

We, humans, are aliens even together.

Is this UFO true or fake?
(Picture I)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

We, humans, are aliens together if we think the relation between western civilization and as an example some Bushmen, who live in Kalahari-desert. Our airplanes and other machines are UFO:s to those people, who live in the stone-age. And this has caused ideas about the ancient state, what would be created very impressive technological advantages, and then they just disappeared. But this is only the hypothetical theory, and there are not many pieces of evidence that support it.  Here I must say, that writing is fun, and I thought that I would write something about UFO:s and their connection with mythical Atlantis.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_people

Maybe those hypothetical members of the ancient civilization were moved to the Universe because the climate of the Earth changed by the meteorite, what destroyed dinosaurs. But there is no evidence about that civilization, and that's why this writing is pure fiction or philosophical thoughts. And as you see, philosophy would give us change to say imagination as the hypothesis, what gives title philosophical thinking for pure fiction.


I thought that I will write this text because there are many theories about the UFOs. And if we would look at the picture, what is above the text, we might notice, that if that saucer-shaped object, what might be some kind of STEALTH-drone, what is used by pumping electricity by using radio-masers, that craft would not explode, because there would not involve any  fuel, what can cause explosion.  Or of course, that picture might be the hoax, but it works as a good example of the thing "what could the UFO:s be?".


Of course, it can be some kind of demonstrator, what uses batteries and electric motors, and maybe it was used demonstrator for next-generation STEALTH-helicopters, what must operate without any noise.  Again Pentagon has released more UFO-files, and I have the opinion, that UFO phenomenon is caused by top secret military aircraft, weapon research or extraterrestrial visitors. In the UFO:s involved many incredible theories about ancient aliens, but there was no evidence of them in nature.


But sometimes I have got incredible thought in my mind, what is based on Plato's tale of mythical tale of the Atlantis. I sometimes read this thing from some book, but it consists the silly theory, that maybe somewhere in the past was one civilization on Earth. And that theory is not so silly, as we might first think. This theory or philosophical thought bases the thing, what we see around us in every day. We must say that modern humans are aliens to other humans. Or what would you like the situation, that some nations have Jumbo-Jets, and some people use still pikes and axes for hunting, and they live in the stone age?


They are living without any technology, those people are nomads and some of them are quite primitive like Bushmans, that live in Kalahari-desert. This difference between technical advantages people inside the human race has made kicks for theories, that in the past was the civilization on Earth, what had the very high level of technical advantages.  And for some reason, that ancient civilization left Earth, and maybe those members of that civilization were reptilians, that lived in the Yucatan area.  And then some meteorites came, and those ancient reptilians left to  Universe for looking new home.


This theory is not the worst of theories about UFO:s, and in this thought, the reptilians escaped from Earth, because of the climate change, what caused the meteorite, that hit the Yucatan area. There are many incredible thoughts about this so-called "ancient aliens", and in some theories, that civilization must be left from Earth, because that was attacked by some stronger civilization.


And when those aliens left the Earth they destroyed the bases, by using meteorites, for covering their existence. As we have seen, we are even today humanoids for other people. And when we are thinking our technical advantage compiling with people, who are living in stone-age, we must think, that are humanoids some people, who traveled to the universe? Maybe we would someday send the people to the other stars.


Because those people are of course highly intelligent, and they would have the very sophisticated technology in use, they might advantage their technology and their genomes would be replaced by some local genomes, and that means that those colonialists would advance and separate from original humans very fast, and then they might become aliens for ourselves.

Sources:

Picture I:

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2018/05/24/the-us-government-just-admitted-to-recovering-materials-from-ufos-here-are-the-latest-updates/

https://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/

If you want to be the top man, you must make sacrifices

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/if-you-want-to-be-top-man-you-must-make.html

https://sites.google.com/view/thereisnotextwithoutinfluence/etusivu

Kimmo Huosionmaa

If somebody believe, that is easy some top man of science or philosophy, that man is wrong. In this text term "philosopher" means also other writers, who write books that are not actually anything else than the production of images. When the person writes lots of things, those texts might involve very serious claiming about the things, what are meant for hidden in some archives. There are many persons who would see those top philosophers or scientists resting in final peace.


If we are thinking pure science, we must understand that there would be many persons, who would see that some vaccines, what is planned to use against cancer as prevention purpose as prohibited. Many medical companies live to make cancer medicines, and if some vaccine would make those medicals unnecessary, would the incoming money flow to that company decrease. And some persons have not so high morale, what we hope, and that is the reason that the persons, who are investigating those vaccines are sometimes afraid of their life.


Also, people who are taken part of the research what was about the unpolluted energy are sometimes faced the diagnoses, that they are somehow mentally ill. The reason why people still want to use fossil fuel and own car is simple. Big cars bring status to some people, and nobody wants to divest their privileges. That is seen in many times in many places, where is the ranking system. In those systems, persons keep their privileges more important than making the job done. I didn't invent that thing myself. There was a program on TV, where this thing was mentioned. There are also many philosophers, who said something, what made them very unpopular in the eyes of the people, who have power in the state. Even if the philosopher wants to follow the law all the time, this person would cause very embarrassing situations for the leaders or some other persons.


When we think that some kind of Voltaire would want to make himself known as the philosopher, this person must write many articles on the Internet. And when somebody writes lots of texts, would happen that this person writes something, what is not satisfy the leaders of the nation. In that case, Mr. Voltaire would want to give his dream about university teacher or official of the state away, because something bad was said against the leaders of the state. In this case, Mr. Voltaire should look for another job than some officer in that land. And in this case, we must understand that sometimes would be better, that nobody even knows, who actually that Philosopher actually is. If the wrong persons would find the real identity of some philosopher, that would sometimes cause the violence against philosopher.


Many persons do feel that they must satisfy all other people when they say something, and in this case, we must say, that we ever can satisfy everybody. And if we want that our texts are popular, we must write something, what makes people interested about those texts. And in that case, we must say, that nobody is interested in texts, what have no critiques against some powerful people. This is the very dangerous thing because is some of those powerful men would sit next to writer in the train, and that text is read for radios, and if some of those powerful men would turn red, will that uncover that critique had the influence to that person. This is why is very difficult to be a philosopher. All texts have some kind of influence on other people.


When philosopher writes much text, would those texts have influence, and as Descartes would say if somebody gets angry because those texts, would the writer existed. But what would that person look like? That is the key question of recognition. And if some texts cause the influence that some other writer goes to the presidential office for those writings, would that cause violations against the writer. And that's the reason, why writers sometimes want to stay undercover. If their identity would uncover, the results could be very painful for that writer. That is the reason, why some writers hide their identities from the public eye.


Mental disorders are the good method to shut the mouth of some persons, and of course, that can stop even the writing process. But when we are thinking of isolation and the way to write and innovation, we must say that world is always tougher than the sword. Like Napoleon Bonaparte, the most brilliant military mind said, who owns the mind of the army, owns the men and weapons of the nation. And as we know the most brilliant minds can make the decisions, what would first seem like mistakes, but then they would become the success.


That would make legends, what is told even today. The legends are born the way, that somebody makes something, what turns the way of history. History is nor of course written as those things were actually happening. The history is written to serve nations. And one way to teach military leaders was, of course, tell them stories of the fights of the past. That's why some battles ever happened in real life, and the stories of those battles are meant for educating the military leaders of the nations. The purpose of those stories would be to make the commanders of the armies analyze the methods what would be done in those situations.


In the medieval age and long after that was the teaching of the Kings quite difficult task, because if that majesty didn't want to learn anything, or the teacher would not pleased the ruler of the state, would that cause very the situation that the teacher were executed, if the King felt that somebody was not honor that unlimited ruler enough. And that is one reason, why we are living in the republic. The reason for supporting unlimited power of the King, was because the continuance were guaranteed in the state. But sometimes the King changed, and that might cause bloody cleanings and executions, when new majesty took the power in the state.


And those cases were very dramatic because many high-rank noblemen lost the head in those prescriptions. The purpose of those political killings was to make next ruler of the state independent. Same time was the purpose to show, what happens the persons, who try to blackmail royal court. One of the most well-known cleanings is when Roman emperor Septimius Severus's son Caracalla slaughtered his father's guards and all personnel of the court because they could tell the information about weaknesses of the new ruler of the Roman empire.


The official version is that Caracalla prosecuted those staff assassination of his father. Caracalla is told to be very brutal caesar, and somebody has been claimed that the stories of the massacre in Eboracum what is now named as York was told that people would afraid him, and maybe this claimed massacre with the assassination of his brother Greta caused fear in the mind of people, and then somebody killed Caracalla. Here we must remember that Caracalla was 22 years old when he became emperor with his brother.


And because of his young age, somebody claimed that his brother killed their father. Young men are the very good target for that kind of propaganda, because they have so little experience of life, and maybe Caracalla believed the stories about the assassination of Septimius Severus. And the isolation of the Severus, and that the bodyguards would not let Caracalla in the tent of dying emperor made him believe that somebody was poisoned his father. The reason for isolation was maybe ordered for quarantine, or because emperor wanted to rest. But they seemed the conspiracy in the eyes of Caracalla. Sometimes those majesty's were unable to stand disappointments.


When we are thinking about the royal policy of many nations, the real Kings had always lightning rod who was good to prosecute, if the wars went wrong. This was the reason, why the royal marshal of Sweden, Armfelt leaped to Russian side. He was afraid that the King would execute him, and that's why this man left to Russia and served the Emperor Alexander I in the committee of things of Finland. Another high-rank Swedish officer, who went to serve Russian emperor was Spengtsporten, who served as the governor-general of Finland in early 19th. century.

https://sites.google.com/view/thereisnotextwithoutinfluence/etusivu

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/if-you-want-to-be-top-man-you-must-make.html

The thoughts about the hypothetical situation that humanoids would land in the Central park of New York.

https://sites.google.com/view/nicesummerevening/the-thoughts-about-the-hypothetical-situation-that-humanoids-would-land-in

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-thoughts-about-hypothetical.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This evening was so calm and nice, that I started to think the hypothetical and very silly situation, where some humanoids from another planet would land to some public place. What would happen in that situation? Would the life of the human race transfer to something else? Probably normal people would not face so many changes than in some Sci-Fi-movies. In this case, the humanoids would not walk in the streets and they would stay in their bases because they would infect the bacteria of Earth if they would not have immunity against those organisms.


Maybe many things would change in international politics, and the humans would start to think, what would happen if those hypothetical humanoids would become hostile. In that case, the people of the Earth must defend they self. This case would be copied from the European colonization of the world. This case is very sad to read because it cost the life of many people in the Wold. In the colonization, the Europeans came first in peace and the explorers wanted to talk with natives, but the meaning of this action was to get information, who would ask for allies, and where would be found gold. After that came the conquistadors, who used force to make those people the slaves. If there would be some advanced civilizations in the Cosmos, I must hope, that they would not act like conquistadors.


In the worst scenario, those humanoids would just shoot the antimatter-ion ray to the center of our planet, what would explode immediately. This is the worst scenario, what we can ever imagine. When the center of the planet would explode, the shock wave would destroy the entire planet. Another version would be that humanoids would cover the Sun with millions of mirrors, and then those mirrors would cause the explode of the Sun because they would mirror return the light from the Sun back to the star. That could cause the exploding that star. When we are thinking about our position in the space, we must be lucky, because there might be not intelligent technical civilization near us, and that might save us from the war between civilizations.


But as we know the most important thing between the relationship between states and civilization is in the Latin phrase "Sic vas et Pacem Para Bellum". That means "If you want the peace, prepare for war. If we meet another civilization, we must be careful. That civilization would probably be peaceful until they would get enough power to make the invasion to the planet. So we must prepare for that before it's too late, says some physics and military leaders, or they are claimed to said.


But of course, we hope that there would be no contact with another civilization or that civilization would be very far away from us. This is the problem with our relationship with another civilization. Another way we would hope to meet the aliens from another star. And another way, we are afraid that hypothetical situation very much. In this case, we must remember, that we are sent very much synthetic radio transmissions to the universe. Most of them are from our radio-equipment, what are not send those radio signals in purpose.



Sometimes I think, what the humanoids would like us if they would see our TV-broadcasts. They might think that we are something "different" than they are. This is another way to think about our relationship with the one of the greatest question in history: why we are only one known civilization what have intelligence and technology? Why we ever met another civilization? In the case that there would be some cosmic council, what would tell civilizations when the contact to some technical civilization is possible because of it technical level has been advanced high enough, that they would know how to communicate with super-civilizations. But the question about those civilizations is, that what was the creator of the hypothetical cosmic council? What was the very first civilization, what took the level of super-civilization? This is the playing with thoughts nothing more or less. And the evening was beautiful, so I wrote this text in the evening.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-thoughts-about-hypothetical.html

https://sites.google.com/view/nicesummerevening/the-thoughts-about-the-hypothetical-situation-that-humanoids-would-land-in

The way to think is the key to creating texts

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/the-way-to-think-is-key-to-creating.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Philosophers are sometimes very interesting persons, and of course, they meet another interesting people. In the stories and writings, philosophers travel around Europe and meet many well-known artists and spend their time in European courts. They always have very much friends and they have of course many connections with European intelligent persons. But when we are thinking about the position of René Descartes as the member of the royal court of Sweden, we must say, that his position as the "crown's official philosopher" was the little bit extravagant.



Of course, philosophers want to be that kind of persons, who spend their life in courts of Europe, but then we must say something, if those philosophers would really live in the royal courts, their life would be very short because the rulers would not always like philosophers ideas. One of the ideas, what was not very popular when it was first introduced was the hidden way to use power. This way to rule the government is very nice for the ruler. In that hidden way to use power, the king or whoever gives public orders is actually a front man. The real power is in the hands of somebody else than public leaders.



Eminence-style way to use power is very attractive because in that model the real ruler of the nation would not ever get responsible for their actions. The possibility of eminence was also the reason, why Allied didn't murder Adolph Hitler during World War II. The only person during WWII who was assassinated by British intelligence by the special operation, what was targeted straight against that person was four stars SS-general Reinhard Heydrich the chief of RSHA, who was murdered or assassinated in "Operation Anthropoid". Here we must ask: "why Adolph Hitler has not targeted that kind of operation, what was accomplished by Allied intelligence.



In that time Allied intelligence didn't actually know, who was real ruler of the Third Reich, and also the mental condition of Hitler was probably in the knowledge of some intelligence officers. The rumors or stories, why allied forces didn't assassinate Hitler goes like this: "If Hitler were assassinated, there would raise some man who was mentally wealthy raise in the power, and that would cause that the war could get longer". But those are only rumors. The reason, why S.O.E (Service Operations Executive) didn't assassinate Hitler was probably burning in some oven after the WWII when British intelligence cleaned their archives.



It is also called as an "eminences". This kind of way to use power is sometimes existed in some companies, what is established by using the name of some famous person. Sometimes we would see eminences in the student unions of Universities. What makes us suspicious is the situation, that the student's union would work against their own interest, like in the case where students want to raise the tuition fees. That is the mark of the influence of eminence. When we are thinking about the situation, that some very public person would establish the company, we must same time realize, that if that person has not trained for leading the company, there must be somebody, who pulls the wires.



Here I'm talking about the firms, what is established by some formula drivers or ice-hockey players. There must find the persons, who have the lawyer or another kind of that background, what justifies them to lead the enterprise-class company. Sometimes we would see the persons, who are the very strong reformer. They always bring their agenda to the public knowledge with the very high profile. And of course, there is always very good ideas, why their agenda is better than others. If some person comes to say, that some system would be better than the existed system, the philosopher would ask one question from that great reformer.



The question is: "what is your position in that new system"?  When we are thinking about the situation, that some students wants to raise the level of the payments of some universities, we must first look at their student cards, and courses, what they are done. Then we must realize that there is always one question about payments: "do you like to pay any payments"? What those students actually want, when they want to get more payments? Are they the highly motivated students, who would get top grades from their courses?



Or are the students, who were motivated in the parties, but studies would not go forward? Sometimes I have to meet university student who wants to be the nurse or something like that. Those students agenda is always been some kind altruism, and they want to do something concrete to other persons, but when we are looking at their grades, those people would not have in the worst case a single course passed. When their student cards are full of failed courses, there would be the new idea in their head. They want to stop studies, and then move to the easier nursery school. And the reason for that new type of altruism is sometimes that this person would want to get access to narcotic medicines or easier place to study.

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/the-way-to-think-is-key-to-creating.html

Let's make maps of the genomes

Kimmo Huosionmaa


Mapping the genomes is not very difficult in theory. In this process, the maker of the genome map only takes genomes from people, and then finds the simultaneous repeating sequences from the genomes. This is the method, to find out, what kind of sequences have some kind of people. The definition of the skin color or other ethnic background made for human genome mapping by collecting the DNA from different kind of people, and those samples were classified by ethnic background of the people, who gave those samples. And then the mapper just found the similar sequences of DNA, and that was allowed to make the genetic map, what uncovered the ethnic background of the people.


But this method can use by uncovered many genetic illnesses, and in this case, would the method be same, what is used in the finding of the ethnic background of people. And many genetic disorders have been mapped in "human genome project". This genetic map would uncover if the person has extreme low IQ, and that might happen with choosing some institute, what takes care about those patients, and then there would be looking for similarities of DNA. In that kind of mapping could use the method, where CP-handicapped sequences are filtered from the test, and that would allow uncovering the genomes, what makes very low IQ (Intelligence quotient).


And then this kind of test could be used also to uncover extreme intelligent persons, and this kind of testing goes like this: first we must find the graves of well-known scientists or some other canonical geniuses, and then their DNA would map to uncover the similarities. And then those DNA sequences would compare with other people. That can uncover those people, but then we must say something, there is a possibility, that those well-known geniuses were not made their texts by themselves. In the past era, the political atmosphere in Europe or even in the whole world were not very liberal. and sometimes those philosophers were even executed because they said or wrote something against the people, who kept power in their countries.


So in this kind of situation, those philosophers must hide their identity, and that's why there would be the sometimes handicapped person in their position. That means that they used shield-man to avoiding political arrests, and sometimes there was handicapped person buried in their grave because the families of those persons wanted to be protected against hate of the powerful people. And that's why the mapping of those genomes, what would use as compile elements of that test would be difficult. In that kind of operations would be needed real "genius-based" DNA to make the test trustworthy.

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/in-future-we.html

Thoughts about the old milestone and old road in Espoo (Life is a road, I want to keep going)

The old milestone

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Many memories are connected to scenes or landscapes. And there are many marks about how the advancing of the city and growing population changes the area and the lines of the roads, but there are still marks from the past times when the cars were smaller and driving speed was lower. Above the text is a picture of the old milestone, what is at the side of the old footpath in the city of Espoo. Of course, that milestone can be carried that place from somewhere else, but maybe that brought some thoughts about chance in my mind. And writing is the nice hobby, and I would like to tell those thoughts to you.


That kind of milestones are not made anymore, or they are on the side of bigger roads, and this picture remains, that in the past the roads were quite different than today. Today this old road does not even have the snow plow in winter time, and it tells something, how the road lines are changed in history. In the past, this road had some kind of meaning because there is a milestone, but then everything changed, and today the line of the main road is in the different place.

The old road in Espoo
near the milestone

But that milestone remembers us, what kind of people lived in here near the capital in a couple of decades ago. The main roads were quite smaller than today, and this footpath is now only the memory from the times, where there were many agricultural fields. But then the price of the ground was raised, and that meant the farmers moved away and sold their farms to the city or building companies.


That meant the end of the agriculture here, near the capital of Finland, but there are many memories about those times, like straight ditches, what are still marking the places of the fields, even this area is now full of trees, and it's now forest area. But in the bottom of the forest is very easy to see the lines of ditches, what is filled with water in autumns and springs. This tells how long those marks of farms are staying in nature.

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/thoughts-about-old-milestone-and-old.html

I think I exist, and if I'm punished for my texts, I exist for some powerful man

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/i-think-i-am-existed.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

René Descartes said once, that if the human being thinks that makes this person existed. In his lifetime, normal or ordinary people did not exist for rulers of the nations. And everything, that said against the king or rulers was the straight attack against the god. If we think this way, everybody who says something against rulers exists only when they are punished.


When we are following the way of thinking, what Descartes followed, we must say that if somebody makes texts or makes speeches, what means nothing, we must ask a question "why this person would punish"? If writing means nothing, the consequences must be nothing? So what in some writings or speeches is so harmful, that the king gives the order to arrest that text maker. Why poor philosopher causes the situation, that all nation must change the laws in the country?


When people make the own writings,  this person must have the capacity to think about those things. And that kind of writings might be harmful to people, that believe that person must keep quiet when somebody would not ask something about that person. Only persons who have right to speak or write something, are superiority officers. And the role of henchmen is to keep their mouth shut, when their leaders are speaking.


When the person raises to a very high-rank official, would the orders, what this person gives become so-called common orders. This might cause some misunderstandings because that kind of person is above everything. Normal man or woman can't say or do anything, what might harm that superiority official.


And if some worker would say something bad about this very high-rank businessman, would that cause the situation, that this person must step down from the tower, and say something about this case to that worker. In this case would look very funny, that some main director of enterprise corporation kicks this worker off. And in this case, would happen that the director would give common orders, that the doors of the company will be closed for the person, who is from some city or state. This means that the director wants to make generic orders for hiring the position. Those high ranking officials of the private or public sectors might sometimes hide behind orders, what are given to all industry. This means, that this person would just walk away if somebody says or does something bad about that person who might be king of the state.


Soon comes to the orders to kick off 3000 persons from their working place, because somebody said that the slips, what this boss used was not very good looking. So that kind of thing might cause the situation, that thousands of workers would kick off or something like that would happen. This is how powerful men are working in real life. And also everybody, who writes about those things, should be quiet because they would not find the jobs from those companies.

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/i-think-i-am-existed.html

What actually is ancient Greece in philosophy?

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/what.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Many times in philosophy have mentioned some persons from ancient Greece. That place and time were full of philosophers, who created many thoughts about things, like idealistic republic and atomic models, but people almost ever asked one simple questions about those philosophers. They ever ask "why those texts are made in long time ago"? In philosophy, the key thing is not proof anything like in some empiric investigations. And what means or what is the role of ancient Greece or philosophers of ancient Greece in that profession. Another question goes like this: what is the difference between the philosophical and historical Greece?


The element of philosophy is to use rhetorical argumentation, what makes those texts or speeches feeling right. And the problem of philosophy is that philosophers are professional thinkers, who sometimes say something, what is not pleased the persons who keep the force in their hands. And that's why is more comfortable to say that some ancient philosopher said those things before some Voltaire said those things in some place because in those cases Mr. Voltaire would be escorted in the cellar of that castle, and then the brutal extortion began.


In the time of Voltaire, there was one golden rule in making writings. The kings or other noblemen should not embarrassed, and the best way to embarrass those people was show that they were wrong. Kings were perfect people, what means the thing, that they could ever be wrong in many cases. But when we are going to meet the modern philosopher's relationship with some man, named Socrates or Plato, we must say that none of the modern philosophers could ever meet those persons from ancient Greece. And in the real life, we can't go and ask anything from Plato or Socrates.


Maybe in some day in tomorrow we could build a time machine, and then we could go to meet those great men from Greece, but before that, we can only use our imagination, why those philosophers claimed to say something, what might be the reason, that those philosophers have made so much claiming. Other philosophers have put their own texts to their name, and we can't go to ask those Greeks that what they really have said or written in some garden in ancient Greece at the beginning of history.

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/what.html

Identity and personality are the great things

travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/

travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/

travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/

Thought about two abandoned houses

Kimmo Huosionmaa

In this text is only thinking, why some person works so no rational way, than in those pictures is done. Why somebody repairs the house, and then leave it empty? And why somebody hates milestones? Those questions might be interested some historians, and here I must say, that the purpose of this text is not to play some Sherlock Holmes. There is no mentioned that in those houses have done any criminal activities. So I just walked near them, and those houses interested me.


At the picture above this text is a picture of the house, and as you might see, this house is abandoned. The reason, why I write this text is, why the roof has got new sheets? When the owner of this house has left somewhere, this person has put new sheets on the roof and then abandoned this house.


The question is, why did this person do that thing? Did this person have too much money, or why this house got the new roof before abandoned? When the normal person leaves the house, is very unusual that the roof would be repaired. And there is something more about this house because there is another house near the first one, why does is didn’t get stainless plates on the roof?

If those houses have been abandoned at the same time, why only another has got stainless steel sheet. Another house has rusty plates on the roof, and that house is also abandoned, but if we think this group of houses carefully, the bigger one is, of course, the main building, but why those stainless steel plates have been put on the smaller one.


This text is only thinking about those houses, and at the second photograph is the milestone, what is destroyed. The reason for the destruction might be something like the sledgehammer, and the destruction might be made for the purpose. But who hates milestones? This is the very good question because those things are quite expensive. And if somebody sees that action, would that interested by police. But those houses are empty, and I was writing this text only for thinking, why those repairs are made just before leaving.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/thought-about-two-abandoned-houses.html

Stephen Hawking’s party for time travelers

Kimmo Huosionmaa


This is philosophical writing about time travel, and it is meant for causing thinking about this fascinating theory, that it is someday possible. If that thing would be possible in someday, we would see, what kind of animals were dinosaurs. But there would also be risks in that technology. What if some neo-nazi would get the time machine in hand, and travels to the past with a couple of history books, and helps Adolph Hitler to victory in the Second World War. That kind of risk would be possible if that technology would transform real, and somebody would make the time machine.

Stephen Hawking was very well known about his coups. And in 2009 he kept the party for time travelers in his home. Nobody visited, and I think that the idea of those parties was the joke, but when I want to write something more about this party, I can’t write the “certainly nobody came” and I must write this text in the mode of the detective story. In this text, I think that I would act like some police detective, in some novel.


So I must say that maybe those time-travelers visited those parties, but does they have knowledge about the ALS syndrome of that man? In this scenario, the time traveler visited in the Hawking’s party, but this man was sitting back to the door, and then the time travelers would think that this man was sleeping and decided not to disturb him. So they saw the situation and went out.


In this text, I would write the things, like there really would be time travelers, what I don’t do in real world. Or sometimes I believe that those fictional characters would be true, and sometimes I think that they are only hoax or joke. But in real-world scientist and investigators cannot say that they are sure about anything. If we think that the time-machine could be real, we cannot say, how sharp it could be. And maybe those time travelers arrived at the parties at the night time.


And in theory, the time traveling could be possible. This phenomenon would happen in the situation, where the speed of the particles would rise to extremely high speed. Near the speed of light, the time would start to go slower. Another way to travel in time would increase the mass of the particle by pumping energy to it. If there would pump enough electrons to some object, it can transform the bite into the small black hole, what “drops” thru the time to the wormhole. This kind of time machine would be possible in someday, but we must wait for the technological advantages little bit more time. The time machine would take the crew to one way trip in the distant future.


Another way to look at this problematic time traveler case could be that those persons thought that that was the trap. And then the time travelers would avoid this area because they might think that some military men try to steal their secrecy. That’s why they would not come to that party.

Sources:

Hawking's party:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elah3i_WiFI

Mad scientist's paradox:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUqxzH0652w

Train ride to the future:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZ0gQevrPTo

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/stephen-hawkings-party-for-time.html

It's not prohibited to use own brains

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/its-not-prohibited-to-use-own-brains.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/its-not-prohibited-to-use-own-brains.html

The little writing about existence.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-little-writing-about-existence.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-little-writing-about-existence.html

Steiner and theosophical methodology

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/steiner-and-theosophical-methodology.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/steiner-and-theosophical-methodology.html

How are the ancient gods made?

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/how-are-ancient-gods-made.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/how-are-ancient-gods-made.html