There are two ways to make quantum systems exchange information.

The first method is to raise the energy level of the particles and make them resonate with the same frequency. Another method is to use two connector particles and use a very low energy level as a medium that transmits information between the systems. 

The problem with quantum communication is simple how to adjust those systems in the same frequency. Above this text is Maurits Escher's painting "Waterfall". And that thing can introduce one of the biggest problems with the quantum system. 

If we want to change information between two towers of that system, we must adjust those towers in the same frequency. And then make the quantum entanglement between those towers. 

Because those towers are part of the same quantum system, there is the possibility to make those crystals resonate and exchange information. But then we can think that the actor that sends information will throw the information from another tower to the next there is the possibility that the information transmitted will miss that receiver tower. 

There would be outcoming energy that destroys the resonation. And that thing makes information go somewhere else it should. 

We always think that information must travel through the system from upward. In that way, system operators would rise the energy level of the quantum participants of the communication. And that thing requires very high accuracy. 

The quantum entanglement and superposition are like a bridge between those towers. In that case, the energy level of those towers will rise to the same level. And then the material or elementary particles will put to resonate with the same frequency. Then the sender side of the superpositioned quantum entanglement will rise to a higher level. 

And that makes the information flow. When the energy level of quantum entanglement rises to the same level, the radiation that the sides of that quantum entanglement will break the entirety by pushing those superpositioned and entangled particles away. That's why the quantum entanglement can stay only a short time. 

The low-energy communication model. 

But there is another way to think about quantum communication. If the system wants to transmit information between those towers it can use four actors in that process. The first actor can drop the information to the second actor. 

That stands at the quantum structure's base floor or base energy level. Then that actor transfer information to the actor that is below the second tower. And the third actor will drop the wire and pull that message or information up to the second or receiving tower. 

Or airflow or energy that is driven behind (or below) that particle. Rises information to the particle at the top of receiving tower. 

There is needed two actors on the ground floor is simple. The system must drive information under the receiving tower. So that's why there needed two actors. And the receiving actor's energy level must be lower. 

This thing is called under-energetic communication. In that version of the communication, the system falls information to the lowest possible energy level. The system drives information to the Bose-Einstein condensate. 

Then that condensate will transfer information to the 2D quasiparticle. And then the laser ray will drive behind that quasiparticle and that makes the information travel from the quasiparticle to the top of the receiving tower to a particle that is waiting for the information. 

The thing that makes this process difficult is the complexity of the system. It's difficult to find the receiving tower in complex systems. Adjusting those systems is very hard. The information transporter must find the right route to the receiving tower. And that is very difficult. The route can be a series of particles that resonate with the same frequency but the energy level turns lower all the time. 

Writing about systems

The universe is full of systems. And actually, it is the system itself. But if we want to make things like quantum computers, we must limit the number of participants. Or the system turns too hard to control. 

When you make systems, first you must separate the system's actors from another entirety. Or the system turns impossible to control. The participant of the quantum system is quantum particles and electromagnetic fields. 

Systems turn very complex easily if they are too big. In the system, every participant has a role. If some participants' energy level is too low. That means the other participants must deliver energy to it. And if one participant's energy level is too high, it shares energy with other participants. If all participants are at the same energy level. That means information cannot travel in the system. 

When you want to make some kind of system, you must separate the participants of systems from the environment. Otherwise, the communication with those participants will not be successful. In quantum systems, the separation can be done by using the energy level and then adjusting the oscillation of the participant with the same level. The base energy level is the thing that separates the entirety of the system from its environment. 

The quantum system is like a tree there are leaves around it. Those leaves are the particles that have similar oscillation and the tree is the thing that has a similar frequency but the energy level is higher. In that kinds of systems, the energy flows from the particles with a higher energy level to particles that have the same oscillation frequency but a lower energy level. 

That separation can raise or lower the energy level of those participants. Rising the energy level is easier to make. And the higher energy level is easier to control than the lower energy level. When we think about the quantum entanglement that plays a vital role in quantum computers we must realize one thing. The energy level between the ends of the quantum entanglements must be different. 

When the energy level on another side is higher. That allows the information travels longer in the quantum entanglement. The thing that destroys the entanglement is that the system reaches energy stability. When the energy level between those particles is the same the data is not traveling. 

So the solution for that problem can be in 2D quasiparticles or particles at the minimum energy level. In that case, the particle or the edge of the quantum entanglement can be on the quasiparticle or particle that is in the lowest energy level possible. That thing conducts energy away from the quantum entanglement. 

If energy can flow away from another side of the quantum entanglement. That thing means energy or information can travel a long time in the quantum computer. The reason for that is the adjusting of the quantum entanglement will remain for a longer period. And that thing makes this system more powerful than ever before. 

Image and sources. 

(https://scitechdaily.com/new-invention-triggers-one-of-quantum-mechanics-strangest-and-most-useful-phenomena/)

Riemann hypothesis (Zeta-function or Riemann's Conjecture) is solved. And that causes the biggest vulnerability problem in the history of the Internet.

Riemann hypothesis (Zeta-function or Riemann's Conjecture) is solved. And that causes the biggest vulnerability problem in the history of the Internet. 

The real part (red) and imaginary part (blue) of the Riemann zeta function along with the critical line Re(s) = 1/2. The first nontrivial zeros can be seen at Im(s) = ±14.135, ±21.022 and¨, ±25.011. (Wikipedia, Riemann hypothesis)

Riemann's Zeta-function has non-trivial a zero-point if the value is 1/2. That means there is a sequence in that formula. And that sequence is the greatest vulnerability on the internet. The Riemann's Conjecture is solved in 2016 but the person would not get the prize of million dollars for solving the Millenium problem because there was something wrong with proof of that problem. 

If we are thinking that one of the most important mathematical formulas, the Riemann's Zeta function or Conjunction has zero points. That thing means that entire RSA encrypting must be made again. The fact is that nobody believed that over the 160 years old mathematical formula could produce prime numbers forever. 

In Riemann's conjecture are the non-trivial zero points in the points The real part (red) and imaginary part (blue) of the Riemann zeta function along with the critical line Re(s) = 1/2. The first nontrivial zeros can be seen at Im(s) = ±14.135, ±21.022, and ±25.011.

And the time of the quantum computers is making the old, prime number based solution where Riemann's conjecture is used for generating the prime numbers old-fashion. In the RSA encryption, the system will multiplicate the ASCII codes by using the prime number. And Riemann's conjecture is used as the generator, that creates the prime numbers for that purpose. The thing is that quantum computers can break any code that is made by using a primary computer in minutes.  

And when we are thinking about the ultimate calculation power of the quantum computer it can break traditional encryption simply by using brute force. The quantum computer would just drive the Riemann's conjecture again and again. And then it just tests all the prime numbers for the encrypted material. The thing is that the quantum computer can make in minutes the series. 

That is taking thousands of years if the attacking system would be the primary computer. And that means no system is safe without depending on is there zero points in Riemann's conjecture or if there are not zero points. The fact is that binary computers are useless against quantum computers. But the Riemann's conjecture is partially solved. There might be a zero point if the value is 1/2. But if we are thinking. 

Those systems secure the data flow created billions of prime numbers by using Riemann's conjecture. The one zero point means nothing for the regular user. If there is one zero point. The system would get the order to avoid that point or values got by using the value 1/2. 

But the fact is that the zero point in Riemann's conjecture is not confirmed, by the way, that the result is mathematically accepted. But there is a strong suspicion that Riemann's conjecture has zero point in the point of value 1/2. 

https://www.insider.com/riemann-hypothesis-solved-by-sir-michael-atiyah-after-160-years-he-says-2018-9

https://theprint.in/science/riemann-hypothesis-161-yr-old-math-mystery-hyderabad-physicist-is-waiting-to-prove-he-solved/692466/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_hypothesis

Image:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_hypothesis

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/