Why does an antique chess console beat Chat GPT in chess?

When we think about those antique ATARI consoles from the 1978 model we always forget that they were not as easy to win as we thought. Those chess programs handled every kind of data as numeric. And the Chat GPT-type artificial intelligence handles that game as visual data. This is one of the things that we must realize when we think about this type of case. Those old chess consoles used very straight, linear tactics. The main difference between modern algorithms and old-fashioned computer programs is that those old programs are linear. And it handles all buttons and movements separately. 

So there is actually a chessbook in those chess programs, that it follows. Those old chess programs were more difficult than some people believe. If you were a first-timer in chess that means you would lose to those consoles. They played very aggressive and straight games against human opponents. The system tested the suitable movements for each button separately button by button. Because the program was linear the movements were made in a certain order. In those chess programs, every movement is determined by the program square by square. The programmer determined the movements for every button and every square separately. And that made those programs quite long. 

Those old-fashioned chess programs have a weakness that if something goes wrong they continue by following that line. There are certain numbers of lines that the program can use. And there is also the end of the line. Those programs can use complete tactics. But their limit is that those programs are fixed. They don’t write their databases and models again if they lose. And that makes those old-fashioned consoles and video games boring. When people learn tactics that it uses they can beat those old-fashioned programs. The limit of those video games is seen in action games. There are always the same points where enemies jump in front of the players. 

Then we can think about things like learning neural networks. Those networks can beat all old chess programs quite fast. The problem is that the neural network must see the game of the console before it can win those systems. AI is like a human. It requires practicing and training. Without knowledge of the opponent’s game, the AI is helpless. There are many ways to teach AI to create tactics against old-fashioned programs. The system can use some modern chess programs and then analyze the opponent’s game to create tactics. 

The other way is the system can analyze the source code and create a virtual machine that it can use to simulate the chess console game. But what do we learn from that case where antique consoles beat the modern AI? Without training the AI is helpless as humans. If the AI has no knowledge of how to play chess, it must search all data including movements of those buttons that make it as helpless as humans. 

Those old-fashioned consoles are RISC applications. They are made for only one purpose. Their code is completely serving the chess game. Modern AI is a complicated system. It can also do many other things than just serving the chess game. And that makes those old consoles somehow difficult to wing, at least when the AI can break its movements and tactics. 

https://en.shiftdelete.net/chatgpt-fails-in-chess/

Chat GPT vs. Humans. The text made by Chat GPT makes it impossible to separate the text, made by humans.

 Chat GPT vs. Humans. The text made by Chat GPT makes it impossible to separate the text, made by humans. 

Text that Chats GPT made is impossible to separate from human-made texts. This thing is problematic in the case of plagiarism. Another problematic thing is the thing, that even the best scanners cannot separate texts that Chat GPT made from texts that humans made. The fact is that cheaters might use the AI rather at home than in an office or they will copy-paste the text that Chats GPT made into an empty Word document. Or they can simply write the text that they see on the cell phone's screen into the documents.

So even if the company denies access to the Chat GPT or Bing homepages, that will not affect things like cheating with the Chat GPT or Bing. AI is a rising tool, that has shown their potentials. And this kind of thing is always problematic because the company's purpose is to make money for its owners. 

"Linguistics experts struggled to differentiate between AI- and human-generated writing, with a positive identification rate of only 38.9%, according to a new study. Despite logical reasoning behind their choices, they were frequently incorrect, suggesting that short AI-generated texts can be as competent as human writing." (ScitechDaily.com/ChatGPT vs. Humans: Even Linguistic Experts Can’t Tell Who Wrote What)

And in that case, there is needed an effective attitude for jobs. AI is a tool that makes work faster and more effective than people. AI is a tool that companies must learn to use. The work's purpose is to make money for people. And people must do all the work effectively. The data systems' purpose is not to make things more difficult. Its mission is to make life easier, not to make things harder than they are. 

But the problem is that AI doesn't ever think about things, that it writes. This is the reason, why people should always check sources by going to those home pages. And in that case, they check the texts and their background. If there is some homepage where there is fake information. The AI will not recognize the data itself, or what the homepage involves. And that causes situations where the AI can make mistakes. 

The mistake is in the home pages that the AI selects. And that is the reason why people who use AI must have enough skills to make the estimation. People can improve the AI's skills to give it trusted information is to preselect the homepages list there is confirmed. The user can make a list of the links to the valid home pages. That helps the AI to select trusted information. 

Things like Scientific America are trusted sources, so the users should have the ability to determine what sources the AI should use. That thing decreases the possibility of making errors, because of the contents of the homepages.  The fact is, that AI is one of the most powerful tools. That means that kind of tool is extremely important for companies. The AI is the tool that makes work easier. And that makes companies give training for people to use that kind of system. 

https://scitechdaily.com/chatgpt-vs-humans-even-linguistic-experts-cant-tell-who-wrote-what/

The AI takes jobs from trained people.

 The AI takes jobs from trained people.

It's not a coincidence that CHat GPT and AI are becoming common things in the ICT sector. The competition in the ICT sector is very hard. And even if a person works for years for the same company, that doesn't guarantee that the ICT worker even sees other workers or talks with anybody in the workplace. 

Outsourcing the ICT operations causes a situation even if a person works years for the same wage payer. The entire career feels like a series of fixed employment. Customers can offer competition once a year for ICT operators. And if own company does not get the job, that causes a situation, where those workers must change their workplace. 

Remote work guarantees that the company where those ICT- people work is only the name on the salary receipt. And if that name hangs years in those papers, the workers change their working position maybe once in month or week. Some people have an attitude that ICT is the sector for people who will not get studies from other sectors. 

The AI is the tool that changes the world. The fast-growing use of AI is something that nobody could predict. The AI is everywhere, it interconnects services and skills. And it beats people in many areas. People are afraid that people like students use AI for making their essays, and that is one thing that requires prediction. 

Of course, the Chat GPT may put secret code in those files that it made the text. But those marks are easy to remove or turn by using copypaste. Or the person can simply write texts from a mobile telephone screen to document. The problematic thing is that cheaters would use those AIs at home out of other people's eyes. So in those cases denying those homepages is not working. 

We know that being effective requires the ability to use new, state-of-the-art tools. The reason people, like programmers, start to use Chat GPT-type chatbots for making their jobs is effectiveness. There is always a hurry in business life. The requirement for making jobs well and fast forces people to use AI-based assistants. 

When a young trainee comes ICT company's service those people face a new type of situation. Some work leaders wait for those rookies who know everything about coding. 

There is nobody who has time to even look at the code, that person makes. Competition for those positions as hired full-time coders is very bloody. And that means there is full-time stress in those works. If the coder cannot make code that runs well, that causes a situation where the boss says, you are off. And that means the person will divorced. 

The AI makes works better, and the reason why companies like that thing is simple. They must not hire people. The AI doesn't make similar mistakes as humans. The thing that is used to argue that AI is the same as employers argue a fixed time work relationships. The purpose of companies is not to be social security offices. And if there is no work to do, nobody is hired. 

Creative people are less bored than others.

 Creative people are less bored than others. 

Social media, social networks, and neural networks are parts of the same thing. Computer and Internet-based social networks are not separate from the real world. If we verbally hurt somebody in an online game situation that person is very sad. Social media is part of our social network and everything that we say in that digital and virtual world reflects our physical world. 

Creative people always do something. They think and things like painting, writing, and other kinds of things give them something to do even in cold and dark autumn evenings. Creative thinking gives those people one thing, that is strange to others. That thing makes creative people find interesting things also in times when there is not very much to do. 

And when a creative person sees something, that thing causes a reaction where those people must just tell something to others. Creative and innovative person is not always the same thing. Creative people can make things like paintings or write essays. But innovative people can turn those things into real products. When we think about things like social media, we must remember that social media itself doesn't cause depression. 

The wrong type of mates and the wrong type of self-expression can cause negative feedback. And if negative feedback is very strong. That thing can cause very bad feelings. When we think about things like depression and problems social media is similar to any other social network. 

The social networks are groups of people. Social media is a media-based application that allows people to communicate with each other. But we must realize that every face in our digital social network is a real person. We can hurt those people very badly. If we write some "little things" about those people. And that can destroy our social network. 

Today mobile applications make social media augmented part of our lives. When we think about environmental connections with social media that thing can decrease energy use and decrease carbon dioxide emissions. If people are not using things like motor vehicles for meetings they use social media for making deals without physical meetings. 

But otherwise, servers require energy. One version of a decrease in addiction from the central energy production units is own energy production. Things like geothermal energy and solar panels are effective systems for guaranteeing the energy supply for servers. 

We can do bad things as well on physical or social networks. When we were young there was no social network. And in that time people made mistakes in self-expression in bars and other social situations. One thoughtless thing like "one salute" could also destroy a person's physical relationships. That happened 30 years ago, the same way it happens today. 

We should stop thinking the social media as a separate thing. We should think of social media as one type of social network. Or maybe social media is an expansion of our real-world relations. And we should think of social media as augmented media in our everyday actions. If we don't think about what we say or write, that thing can cause reflection in our physical life. 

https://scitechdaily.com/new-study-reveals-how-creativity-can-save-you-from-boredom/

https://scitechdaily.com/popular-myth-debunked-social-media-does-not-cause-depression/

Precise answers require precise information. 

Chat GPT should beat people in math. The fact is that the Chat GPT should be an ultimate tool in things like math. Math is always simple. There are certain formulas. And Chat GPT must just find those formulas. That it can position certain values in certain points of the mathematical formula. Without certain orders the Chat GPT is helpless. 

If orders are not certain that means the ability to handle precise information doesn't mean a thing. Without precise, clear, and accurate information. Even the AI cannot make a thing. The AI is very good if it can use existing formulas. But if the AI must make something new it's in trouble. The AI can connect existing information. 

But Chat GPT falls from math and economics students. The reason for that is that the Chat GPT is not very good for creating new things. If Chat GPT must find values from text and find a needed formula from the net that thing puts Chat GPT in a position where it is not meant. 

If we want to put Chat GPT to make some calculations we should say the name of the needed formula. Then the Chat GPT must have the catalogue where the necessary values are. If Chat GPT must find the data itself by using some verbal task that is not mentioned, what is the right formula that makes a problem for Chat GPT? Chat GPT is best for analyzing certain and precise data.

https://interestingengineering.com/science/chatgpt-falls-short-of-students-in-math-and-economics

Chat GPT outperforms university students as text producers.

Chat GPT outperforms university students as text producers. 

The Chat GPT is a very good tool. It outperforms many things and the next-generation coders and other workers might only advise to Chat GPT or some of its successors and the AI makes the calculations and codes for the person who uses it. So maybe Chat GPT is the end of the era of coders or analysts. 

When we think about students, they have to learn to work with the newest possible tools. The business and military environments require flexibility and effective tools. The purpose of studies is to give a person the capacity to operate in real-life business and technical environments. Nobody sits in school forever. 

We know that some students are cheating. But those students cheat anyway. That means the Chat GPT is a system that requires an honest attitude. Students are cheated throughout history. The most common way to cheat in studies is to hire some other person to do their work. And that means the AI just gives that possibility to people who have no money and relationships that make essays for those students. 

The Chat GPT and other similar algorithms are a challenge. But people must just respond to that challenge. They must learn to use those new programs because they are necessary tools. The Chat GPT and other similar applications can already used for making military systems. And Ukrainian army uses those applications for the R&D of their equipment. 

Who work with mechanical areas in computers and especially programming technology. When we are talking about the end of coders we are talking about the end of the era of low-paid one-time-used workers. The Chat GPT and its "family algorithms" like Bing are tools that are making prima-code very fast. And that's why they are the ultimate tools for programming. 

When we think about AI and its abilities we must remember that only imagination is limited. The fact is that AI is the tool that will turn everything around. It's a game changer in business, engineering, and war. The AI-based metaverse applications have many possibilities that even their developers cannot predict. Maybe in the future, we will live in a metaverse that interconnects multiple physical and virtual systems into one entirety. 

The 3D printer systems that can connect with AI can make everything. There is a possibility that the metaverse is a matrix where people can use virtual characters or they can use physical robots as external bodies. Those external robot bodies can turn all vehicles and aircraft into robot systems. 

The BCI systems can make it possible for people can see things like animals see them. The BCI can transmit things that things like birds are seeing. And that thing can turn every single animal into a biosensor or biorobot that can be used in many missions in scientific, law enforcement, and military areas. The thing is that the metaverse along with BCI means that people can live in the virtual world. Architects can see what their house looks like in real places. Aircraft and car designers can give instructions for AI. And that thing makes models by following those instructions. 

The AI-based design tool makes it possible for people can make customized cars and other vehicles by using simple design tools. If we interconnect that design tool with a 3D printer system that follows orders and makes it possible to create customized vehicles and other merchandise for customers. 

The metaverse allows customers to see the product in the natural environment. The vacuum technology where that printer operates allows them to create high-class, high-temperature products. Also, new carbon fiber- chromium-steel composites are making the new hardness to those materials that the high-temperature 3D systems can use. 

And of course, people say that AI and combat robots are not humanitary weapons. The fact is anyway, the purpose of the military is to be effective. Without killer drones, Ukraine would fall. The thing is that those killer robots are effective tools for non-humane purposes. And war is a non-human action. But if the nation wants to defend itself it must have effective military forces. 

https://scitechdaily.com/new-study-chatgpt-outperforms-university-students-in-writing/