Could the standard model of physics crack?

In the image above the hypothetical graviton is connected to the Standard model. It forms the new group of bosons. And that group is tensor bosons. The scalable bosons are proven when the Higgs boson is found. But we know that there might be many unknown particles. 

And in some visions, the graviton is a particle that orbits other elementary particles. The graviton would be the particle form of the gravitational waves. And it forms because of the wave-particle duality of the gravitational waves. 

So what is the direction of the gravitation? 

If we think that the gravitation is like a light that has the particle and wave movement form we might understand the direction of the gravitation. 

When the wave-form gravitation hits the graviton. That is the particle form of gravitation. That causes scattering in the wave-form gravitation. 

That scattering makes the electromagnetic or quantum shadow between that graviton and particle. And then that thing would just pull the quantum field of the particle that could be quark or any other particle. That movement moves the quarks to that quantum low-pressure area. And because the graviton moves the quarks that thing moves atoms. 

The graviton could be the orbiter of quarks and electrons. (Or maybe it orbits all elementary particles). 

There is the possibility that the graviton orbits other elementary particles. If that thing is true. The companion particle that orbits other elementary particles could explain the Muon G-2 anomaly in Brookhaven and Fermilab. It can also explain why W-boson is 0,1 times heavier than it should be. If we think that all elementary particles have an orbiter. That thing causes an anomaly in the trajectory of high-speed electrons and muons. 

If we are thinking that the small particle is orbiting electrons and other elementary particles we can understand why mysterious gravitons are hard to detect. So graviton would be a similar elementary particle with electrons and quarks. The origin of the graviton would be in the wave-particle duality in the gravitational waves. 

And if we think that graviton is the companion particle that orbits quarks and electrons. That thing means that when gravitational-wave impact those particles. They are starting to stretch the quantum field of the particles. That thing makes the quarks move in a certain direction. If the graviton is the companion particle with almost all of the elementary particles. That explains why its effect is neutral. 

Also, the electron's ability to send the photon or light quantum while it is changing its direction. Can be explained by the companion particle. The quantum field of the fast-moving electron turns strong. And then the particle that follows the electron would act like a car trailer when the car moves at high speed on a curved road. The particle that follows the electron touches the quantum field of the fast-moving object and then it sends the light quantum when the energy level of that particle turns too high. 

The graviton could be the "dark photon". 

That thing means that it probably cannot move electrons. But it can move the quarks inside protons and neutrons. So the graviton might have a similar shape to photons. It might have wave- and particle forms. 

If the speed of the particle raises near the speed of light. That causes an electromagnetic vacuum behind it. And that hypothetical but predicted particle would follow the particle. During the collimation of electrons and positrons, the small particle is extremely hard to detect because the impact causes energy and particle cloud where that extremely small-mass particle is hard to separate.

The case that some particle is following the electron or some other elementary particle in the particle accelerator could explain, why electrons are stretching when they are traveling in that magnetic trajectory. The following particles along with electromagnetic or quantum vacuum make it possible that the quantum field of the electron and other elementary particles is starting to stretch backward. 

What is the origin of dark matter? Is it graviton?

This thing is an endless question. Dark matter is the gravitational effect that is dominating the universe. Sometimes researchers are thinking that dark matter is the source of dark energy. But let's talk a little bit about the origin of dark matter and how its source could be gravitation itself. The fact is that. We almost know that gravitation is wave movement. Or at least gravitational waves exist. So the particle-wave duality is possible in gravitational waves just like it's possible in photons and quarks. 

And that means that gravitational waves can turn into a particle called the graviton. So why graviton is so hard to detect? There is the possibility that graviton is orbiting some elementary particles like electrons and quarks. Or it can orbit each of the elementary particles. The companion particles of the elementary particles can explain the Muon G-2 anomaly in Fermilab and Brookhaven. 

https://www.livescience.com/heavy-w-boson-measurement-cracking-standard-model

https://www.quantamagazine.org/fermilab-says-particle-is-heavy-enough-to-break-the-standard-model-20220407/

https://www.space.com/dark-matter-origin-gravity-theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W_and_Z_bosons

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

Why G-2 anomaly the first time is seen in Fermilab?

There are two possible explanations for the Muon G-2 anomaly.

1) The unknown natural force affected that particle

2) Particle impacts with some unseen particle. So could that impact be the interaction between the dark matter particle? 

The theory of axions bases the idea that this hypothetical particle forms thing, called dark matter. There is the possibility that dark matter is a material that has an extremely large quantum field with visible material. So similar but more high-energy quarks are forming that material. There is also the possibility. That the hypothetical axions are like some other well-known particles. That have different shapes or different sizes. 

In some theories, the Big Bang that forms the visible universe was the collapse in the energy level of dark matter.  When something caused the quantum fields of dark matter to collapse they send the radiation. So the dark matter could be a higher energetic material that has a larger quantum field than visible material. 

x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x

The Muon G-2 anomaly challenged the Standard model of physics. The reason why that anomaly is seen in the Fermilab. And other low-energy particles accelerators are an interesting thing. 

In high-power particle accelerators, the effect that changes the trajectory of the particle must be far stronger than in low-energy particle accelerators. The thing that can change the trajectory of the particle can be the impact with another particle or it can be some kind of power- or quantum field. 

When a particle accelerator accelerates a particle that particle acts like all other moving objects. The speed increases the kinetic energy and mass of the particle. So we can use a car as an example. What happens in a particle accelerator when the particle's speed is rising very high. When the car moves at a very high-speed impacts something that car continues in its track. 

In the same way, the side wind effects are less strong if the car is moving at high speed. The side coming effect must be stronger than the kinetic energy of the car that it can affect the track of the vehicle. In the same way, when the car impacts something the energy asymmetry in the body must be so strong that it can change the car's track. When a car impacts something that impact causes the soundwave, thermal wave, and debris. 

The same way happens in particle accelerators. If the speed of the particle is too high when it impacts something the particle just crushes its opponent. But that impact doesn't happen without a trace. The impact with another particle causes wave movement and debris. Those things are called virtual particles. The virtual particle is the bubble in the quantum field. 

So the virtual particle is not forming from emptiness. There must be some kind of quantum field that forms those strange fields. So is the source of the virtual particles in CERN the impact with the dark matter. When the extremely fast-moving particles are moving in particle accelerators there are forming so-called ghost particles. So could the origin of the ghost particle be the yet unknown particle? 

Se also:

Big Bang

Dark energy

Dark matter

Muon G-2 anomaly Fermilab

The standard model of physics

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

The fifth fundamental interaction is at the door.

The LHC tests have supported the Brookhaven and Fermilab Muon g-2 experiments. And there is the possibility that the fifth natural force or fundamental interaction has existed. The form of the fifth force needs description before that result can use for something. 

If the observation cannot do for something that thing means nothing. In the case of the fifth force before interaction has been described. That thing is the same as nothing. Making formulas in the world of quantum mechanics requires very high accuracy. 

Or description is needed when the scientists are making their models for the interactions. The most interesting thing in the suspected fifth force is what is the transportation particles of it. 

So the knowledge of the existence of some force is not enough. For using that knowledge there is needed the knowledge of the form of that thing. Also, the strength of the force compared to other forces must describe before it can use for formulas that are describing quantum level interactions. 

There are two possibilities about the form of the fifth force. 

1)The fifth force is so weak that all other forces are covering it.

2)The fifth force is so strong and dominating that we cannot recognize it.

 

In description should determine which part of the atom or subatomic structures the fifth natural force makes interact. In some very interesting theories. The reason why we haven't seen the fifth force earlier. Is that it interacts straight between quantum fields. In that model, the quantum fields are making the connection between each other. And that would explain why that thing has not been seen before.

The fifth force is detected because there is an anomaly in the trajectory of muons. The tests are made by using extremely high accuracy. There is always the possibility that there was a measurement error. But when we are observing that thing. The question is does the trajectory of muons fit the calculated marginal? 

The question about the lack of confirmed transportation particles could have many answers. One is that the transportation particle of the predicted fifth force is so small that it cannot detect. In another version, the transportation particle is riding with some other transportation particles of the four forces. 

So could the fifth force be an interaction between the transportation particles of the four fundamental interactions? That means it could be far more interesting than nobody thought. 

Can there be a force that has no transportation particle? Can the channel between quantum fields replace the transportation particle? The key question is how the interaction could form without transportation particles? 

But what is the particle which quantum field the fifth force uses? Is it the quantum field of protons, electrons, quarks, or even the entire atom? Or is there some kind of transportation particle of that force that existed? The universe is one of the most interesting places in the world. There might be many particles that are waiting for their founder. 

https://home.cern/science/physics/standard-model

https://news.sky.com/story/a-fifth-fundamental-force-of-physics-has-been-suggested-by-muon-experiment-12269355

https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-may-have-discovered-new-force-of-nature-in-lhc-experiment

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_force

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

Image:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

https://visionsoftheaiandfuture.blogspot.com/

Muon g-2 and wormholes

If the thing that causes the anomaly in the Muon g-2 tests is not in the particle accelerator. It's between Brookhaven laboratory, New York, and Fermilab, Chicago.

The strange thing in the Muon g-2 experiments is that the thing that seems to cause the strange anomaly in the trajectories of Muons seems to be between Brookhaven and Fermilab and that thing pushes the particles in their trajectory. If I read the diagram of the Muon g-2 experiment right the effect is pushing the muons in the opposite direction. 

And if the reason for that thing is outside the particle accelerator the source of the strange energy is between Brookhaven and Fermilab laboratories. The effect seems to push and that thing seems that there is some kind of source that pushes the particles away.  If that thing is the wormhole (Einstein-Rose bridge) the extremely think energy channel through the universe and Earth. 

Image II

Are wormholes (Einstein-Rose bridge) superpositioned and entangled black holes?

Could the wormhole be two channels that are taking material through space and time? In that case, the wormhole would be formed by series of superpositioned and entangled particles. In image II (Image II) is the portrait of the superpositioned particles. 

There is the possibility that the black holes could superpositioned themselves like those particles. Because the other particle is upside down to another that thing is giving an idea that the material or energy will move in two directions in the black hole. 

That thing would cause the interaction between some kind of energy and the particles. The idea is that the wormhole is the channel between superpositioned black holes. The material that drops in the black hole is not stable. So when the energy level in the superposition is rising. That causes the vibration in the black holes and the energy bridge between them. 

Nobody has ever seen a wormhole. But there is a theory that a wormhole is interacting with its environment through its quantum fields. The "cosmic neural structure" or cosmic web is causing an idea that the wormholes would be possible also in space. (Image III) Something causes that the material is packing in the structure which looks like the neural network. And one explanation for that structure could be the string-type structure that is pulling material around it. The cosmic web is the largest known structure in the universe. And that has caused many thoughts about the form of the universe. 

Image III

The black hole itself is the wormhole through time. But there is the possibility that the wormhole is two energy channels through the universe. In that case, energy will surround those two superpositioned black holes. In theory, black holes can be superpositioned and form the energy channels between them. 

But is it possible in real life? That thing is possible to ensure by comparing the oscillation of the black holes. And if the black holes are superpositioned and entangled. That thing means that the oscillation of those superpositioned and entangled black holes should be identical. 

https://muon-g-2.fnal.gov/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brookhaven_National_Laboratory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermilab

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon_g-2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

Image III:https://www.sciencealert.com/astronomers-declare-the-boss-great-wall-the-biggest-thing-in-ever-found-in-the-universe

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

Did the micro-black hole make the curving of the Muon in the Muon G-2 experiment?

Image I: "The first result from the Muon g-2 experiment at Fermilab confirms the result from the experiment performed at Brookhaven National Lab two decades ago. Together, the two results show strong evidence that muons diverge from the Standard Model prediction. Image: Ryan Postel, Fermilab/Muon g-2 collaboration" (https://news.fnal.gov/2021/04/first-results-from-fermilabs-muon-g-2-experiment-strengthen-evidence-of-new-physics/)

The Muon G-2 experiment can be the beginning of new physics. But it can also begin for the new material structures. The Muon G-2 experiment can also show that the quantum-size black holes existed. 

Is the thing that caused strange curving in the trajectory of Muon in the Muon G-2 experiment the quantum-size black hole or fifth natural force? Or is it the radiation that comes out from the quantum-size black hole? The quantum-size black holes are sending Hawking radiation the same way with the other black holes. So does the Muon G-2 experiment show the existence of the quantum-size black holes? 

The quantum-size black holes are like all other black holes.  Their size is smaller than atoms or even quarks and those extremely small black holes are also pushing objects away from them. The radiation that is sending from the poles of those quantum black holes can push other objects away. The fact is that nobody has seen those quantum-size black holes yet. But if they can be created that thing can make the most fundamental advantages in communication or another type of technology. 

Image II: Atomic structure of diamond

The most exotic of theoretical materials is the black hole crystals. The crystal-shaped structure is formed of black holes. So if that diagram of the atomic structure of diamond is used as the base. In this theoretical material, the places of carbon atoms would be the quantum-size black holes. (Image II)

If black holes can stabilize at certain distances from each other. There is a theoretical possibility that the black holes can form the most utopistic material in the world called black hole crystals. The black hole crystal is possible if the quantum black holes can stabilize in a certain form by putting them to direction and distance where the pushing and pulling forces of black holes and their radiation are effecting with the same power to the other black holes. 

That can make the most fundamental material in the world possible. But there is a big possibility that making the black hole crystals will be impossible. And still, today that thing is part of so-called theoretical materials.  

Image III

Can the superpositioned and entangled particle pair turn the photon or electron into a micro-size black hole? 

The creation of that material is impossible. Or it requires an extremely powerful energy load. But it is theoretically possible to stop electrons or photons between the superpositioned and entangled particles. In that case, the energy would pump to that particle that is just in the middle of the "8"-shaped power field. That is seen in image III, which is the artist's impression of the superpositioned and entangled particle pair. (Image III) 

There is the possibility that the quantum-size black holes could form similar crystal structures with regular atoms. The idea is that those extremely small black holes con put to exactly the right distance from each other. In that structure, the radiation and the gravitational effect of the quantum black holes have similar forces. 

When pulling and pushing forces are stabilizing those black holes. In this theoretical black hole-based crystals can hover over certain distances of each other. And they are forming the most utopistic material black hole crystals. But there is the possibility that this kind of black-hole crystal cannot form in practice. 

The strange curving of the Muon G-2 experiment seems like there is some kind of pillar-type structure in the particle accelerator. The particle seems to avoid that "pillar" or series of pillars. So is it possible that the quantum size black holes or some kind of quantum-size wormholes can make this phenomenon true? 

The curving trajectory of the muon in that test tells that the unknown force doesn't affect the particle all the time. Or the effect is not coming from all directions. That curving can cause the point-shaped object that is in the particle accelerator or affect the trajectory somehow only at certain points. The thing that seems to cause curving is the force that acts to muon like shower acts to the ball. So is that thing the fifth natural force, some unseen radiation, or the extremely small-size black hole? 

()https://muon-g-2.fnal.gov/

()https://www.space.com/four-fundamental-forces.html

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_force

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_black_hole

Image I()https://news.fnal.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Muon-g-2-results-plot.jpg

Image: II() https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamond#/media/File:Diamond_structure.gif

()https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/