Happy 100-year birthday, quantum mechanics.

 Happy 100-year birthday, quantum mechanics. 

The GIF above this text introduces field interaction. When the outside field pushes the inner field, the inner field’s or structures' size will turn smaller. Until the pressure or energy level in it can break that process. Or the pressure or energy level turns so high that it can resist the outside field. 

It’s 100 years of quantum mechanics. In 1925, young scientists named Werner Heisenberg went to Helgoland Island and developed the concept of quantum mechanics. In Helgoland, he realized that all things in the universe are in interaction. There, that person realized that the sky is blue because some kind of particles hit it.

And then that thing caused shockwaves that we see as blue light. The blue light is so-called Cherenkov radiation. That radiation forms when a particle that travels speed of light hits the atmosphere. Those particles must slow their speed because the speed of light is lower in the atmosphere than outside the atmosphere. 

When a particle slows its speed, it must transfer its kinetic energy into its environment. When a particle hits the atmosphere. It sends a shockwave. The shockwave that we see as a photon is the thing that slows the particle's speed. When we think that the universe and all other systems are growing entropy, that means. We see that chaos is increasing in the system. But then we must wake up and make one decision. 

If the system is limited, any phenomena in it cannot be unlimited. And then we can see that entropy is not literally “chaos”. It's the thing that might look like chaos. But there can be repeating structures. Like in fractals. If researchers can someday find the order in the system’s entropy, they can calculate changes in its shape backward. And if those calculations are made right, they can uncover the shape of the original system. 

That makes this type of thing interesting. When a particle travels through the universe, it collects information from its environment. That information is on the particle like plague. And the problem is that. We cannot touch the particle. But if we could see the shape of the information that forms hills and potholes on the particle’s shell. If researchers know the route and entire systems. If the particle passes, it makes it possible to reorder that information. The problem is that near all stars, molecular nebulae, X- and gamma-ray bursts, and all other things involve quantum systems. 

The quantum fields in those systems are unique. And that makes this model theoretical. But if researchers know everything about the  particle’s route. They could restore information and see what things look like in that particle’s route. If that kind of thing is possible. That makes the quantum network possible. Data travels in a quantum network connected to particles. And if researchers can protect the data and calculate it back in the form. Where information was at the beginning of the particle’s journey. It allows sending bottle-post where information is stored in electrons. 

The ability to remove entropy. Makes it possible to see distant objects. And it can also allow researchers to transport information from the past to the future. Or from the future to the past. The black hole is the thing that can transport information from the future to the past. But the problem is that the entropy at the edge of the event horizon turns information into a mess that nobody understands. 

That entropy is like a series of whirls that mix information into a form. That makes no sense. But if researchers know how that border behaves and what kind of whirls there are. That allows them to re-order that information. That requires complete knowledge of the systems. And how those things behave in interaction. 

Time arrows and black holes.

Antigravity and Meissner effect. 

Normally, the Meissner effect is an electromagnetic phenomenon in superconducting materials. The Meissner effect happens in electromagnetic wavelengths. The gravitational Meissner effect is a similar effect that happens in the gravitational wavelength. Today, the gravitational Meissner effect is still a theory. 

Can gravity be like the Meissner effect? The Meissner effect is possible only in the extremely low temperature superconducting objects where an atom’s quantum fields form an entirety. The question is whether a similar effect that forms in gravity fields forms in cases where all parts of the atom are under one homogenous quantum field? Or is it enough that the electrons will push against the atom’s core into a homogenous form? 

If the “Gravitational Meissner effect” is possible, that makes antigravity levitation possible. If the gravitational Meissner effect is possible, that means the energy waves that travel past the particle or object are like time arrows, or arrows of time. Those things harness energy from their environment and push it into particles or particle groups. And that energy pushes those particles back in time. 

Or, otherwise saying, they cause time dilation. When the mass of an object increases, that means its spin turns faster. The spin speed accelerates until the particle cannot receive energy. Then the particle's speed starts to slow. In that process, it sends energy waves. Because it must transfer that kinetic energy somewhere. Black holes send gravitational waves when they slow their speed and release energy that is stored in them. 

The arrow of time (or time arrow) in the modern universe. 

Why doesn't the time arrow (arrow of time) work in the modern universe? There is one very good explanation. There is too much space in the modern universe. When a time arrow moves forward, it pushes energy to objects like particles around it. And then that energy pushes particles back in time. But the problem is that this requires that the particle can store the energy that it gets. In the modern universe, a receiving particle takes that energy into its quantum field. And then releases that energy immediately. 

The time arrow that pushes an object back in time requires a situation where a particle that receives energy will not give that energy away immediately. So the system must be dense enough and harness energy from a large enough area that the time arrow (or arrow of time) can push particles back in time. 

When we think about things like wormholes, those hypothetical energy tornadoes are one version of the time arrows. The wave movement tornado around the wormhole stores energy from around it. Then that energy will move to an object that travels in the wormhole. That energy can prevent an object from aging because that thing will not let the energy out from that particle or object. The case where the wormhole transports objects back in time is this. 

Diagram of the Meissner effect. Magnetic field lines, represented as arrows, are excluded from a superconductor when it is below its critical temperature. (Wikipedia, Meissner effect). Can this kind of effect be possible in the gravitational fields? In this image, Tc= temperature critical or critical temperature. The critical temperature means that below the critical temperature. The Meissner effect turns into reality. Could there also be a density critical that makes the gravity field act like EM-fields act in the Meissner effect? 

The energy level in those objects that travel in a wormhole must rise higher than the energy shadow at the front of the particle can transport that thing out from the object. The black hole is one type of time arrow. The black hole is a very fast-spinning object that collects quantum fields from around it and transforms that thing into kinetic energy. That means the black hole’s spin accelerates all the time. But that acceleration stops sooner or later. When the spinning speed of a black hole slows, it sends gravitational radiation or gravitational waves. 

When a black hole or any other particle spins in the energy field, it collects energy from that field. That thing makes an energy pothole. The pothole is the wormhole back in time. The particle can harness energy only from its environment. The thing in black hole cases is that the black hole is not eternal. It makes a hole through time. But the reason why the time arrow works in that case is that the energy field in that pothole is dense enough. The energy cannot escape from the black hole as easily as it could escape from some other objects. The black hole’s energy level can rise so high that it breaks the energy barrier around it. And that causes black hole destruction. The black hole travels back in time until it starts to deliver its energy. 

But why can gravity slow aging? The answer can be in the nature of gravity. If we think that gravity is one form of the Meissner effect, the particle that spins just makes energy fields travel past the particle. That makes quantum levitation. In the case of black holes, particles are in the same direction. And that makes the effect more powerful. The fast spin packs energy, or quantum fields, from such large areas that the object cannot release its energy through that thing. The dense material causes quantum fields to travel through the extremely dense object. Those energy fields or waves are like time arrows. They push objects in the middle of them back in time because they cannot let quantum fields travel through them. 

That means if we want to make a time machine that uses a time arrow, we should make extremely dense pearls. Then we must shoot particles or laser beams through it. That pumps energy to the structure around the channel. But for working that requires extremely dense materials. 

https://www.ecoticias.com/en/humanity-breaks-time-for-the-first-time/18338/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect

Gravity and entropy.

 

From the point of gravity model. The problem with this image is that. Both balls should have a pothole under them. Those potholes make energy travel between those objects. And that causes things like quakes in black holes. Energy that travels between gravity quantum points makes shockwaves around the entirety. 

Gravity fields form multiple gravity fields or sub-fields that form around individual quantum points. We see those things as entirety or coherent fields. But they form around multiple particles. That forms space and entropy in the gravity field. 

The problem with this image is that. Both balls should have a pothole under them. Gravity fields form multiple gravity fields or sub-fields that form around individual quantum points. We see those things as entirety or coherent fields. But they form around multiple particles. That forms space and entropy in the gravity field

Space between actors makes space in the gravity field. And that is the beginning of entropy. The actor that makes the gravity field is an elementary particle. And the gravity field that outsider sees. Is the sum of those actors' gravity. That thing means there is space between those fields. That space forms entropy. 

Quantum gravity means the electron's, quark's, and other particles' gravity field. The spin of the particle has a connection with its mass. The mass is conducted with gravity force. That means the gravity field's strength is the speed at which the particle transports or harvests energy inside it. When a particle harvests energy from its environment it transports the field inside it. That energy field transports other things with it. 

So time dilation forms when that energy impacts particles. That energy is like wind that transfers energy into those particles. That energy forms a quantum shadow that pulls particles with it. 

When we look at gravity fields, we might think that they are uniform. Gravity fields are not coherent. They form around multiple particles. The gravity field in the gravity center looks like whirls. Which means the gravity center is not monolithic. There are multiple gravity centers in the gravity field's center, so the gravity field is virtually coherent. When we think that mass, energy, and density are things that form gravity, we can make a model where the gravity field is like a whirl. When a particle starts to spin it bounds energy into itself. So black holes are only fast-spinning and very dense objects. 

When an object spins at a very high speed it forms an electromagnetic shadow or vacuum around its shell. Those shadows make the energy fields travel to that object. The dense object has smaller "hills" and "valleys" on its shell. Then less dense objects have. In this text, particle means single elementary particle like quark. The object means the group of quarks or other actors. 

The object can spin faster because it doesn't deliver as much energy into its space. The object turns into a black hole if it cannot deliver the energy that it harvests from its environment. So when the spinning object increases its energy level it will just harvest it from its environment. When an object spins faster and faster it forms an energy bubble around it and if energy that jumps out from the particle cannot cross that bubble it gets more and more energy. 

Energy in that bubble pushes particles or objects into denser and denser forms. So when the uneven things on the particle's or object's shell harvest energy into it, that thing makes a small channel through the energy field. And those things are things that form the gravity field. So we can make a model that gravity is the hole in the energy field. Those channels are like tubes or rubber hoses that turn closer and closer to each other inside the gravity center. They form a tight bundle that unites in the gravity center. There is always a small point in the ball there is no gravity. 

In the gravity field, every single object or actor has its own gravity field. That means gravity fields are multiple fields. Because the gravity field is not uniform or coherent that forms space in the field. And that space makes entropy. 

Quantum gravity has a connection with entropy. So, what does that mean in real life? That means the gravity field is not coherent. In gravity models, every single particle with mass has its own gravity field. So, gravity fields have multiple cores. Every particle in its entirety. Forms a gravity field around it. That gravity field can look like a whirl. That means there is free space in the gravity field. Those whirls interact with each other and that forms smaller and smaller whirls around those gravity fields. And those small whirls turn larger all the time. In that process, every single particle or actor in the gravity field transports a little bit of themselves to those whirls that look like fractals. 

 https://phys.org/news/2025-03-sneaky-clocks-uncovering-einstein-interacting.html

https://interestingengineering.com/science/quantum-gravity-einstein-entropy

Pharaoh's curse and Eldorado are still fascinating things.

Akhenaten and Nefertiti with their dhildren. 

We have all heard stories of Pharao's curse and eldorado, the mythic golden city that hiring in jungles. And those things are causing many discussions. So are Pharao's curse and Eldorado real, or are they just legends? 

If we think that the pharaoh's curse is real. We should ask, is that thing something in the pharaoh's body? Or, is it something in that person's food? 

There are many theories like a theory that Pharoh's curse is some kind of fungus that looks like psilocybin fungus. Priests in ancient Egypt used those mushrooms for hallucinations. 

There is always a possibility that some of those people just turned mushroom addicts and ate the poisonous mushrooms during their rituals. There is a UFO theory that the pharaoh's curse is some kind of intelligent fungus. In some models of interstellar travel, the neuron-fungi hybrid is used as the biological computer that controls the mission. 

 Or is it something that was put in the pharaoh's grave?  Is it something that involved the rank of Pharaoh? Or is it something that happens to the pharaoh when that person cannot lead the state anymore? Is it something like poisoning that person, when the leader is useless? 

Is eldorado myth, or is it real? 

Macchu Picchu (Wikipedia)

Sometimes is claimed that the Mythic Eldorado is the "Hombre dorado" or "Golden man". There is a possibility. That the original story means the man, who dressed in gold. So can Eldodaro or "el hombe dorado" mean pharoh? Did South American Indians have connections with Ancient Egypt? 

The Eldorado can exist at least virtually. There is the possibility that Eldorado is a spiritual thing. In that model, it's the state of mind, that people should contest. If Eldorado has some connection with the highest-class priests and their rituals, that means. It can be rather spiritual than a physical thing. 

It can be pyramids that are covered by using leaf gold. That means the golden city exists. But there is not so much gold as we think. Another thing that can explain Eldorado is that it's a story that Indians told to the Spanish. 

They advised conquistadors to the jungle they leave people alone. Or in some other version of that myth, the Cuzco was Eldorado, and conquistadors found it. Or maybe Macchu Picchu was Eldorado. And conquistadors took gold, but they didn't tell their supervisors. 

But they didn't know that Cuzco was the place. That it looked like there was lots of gold in that city. So that could mean that Cuzco was Eldorado. 

Or in some other versions of that theory, the Eldorado locates on Eastern Island, in Africa, or in Antarctica. Or even in Europe. The things that introduced support for that theory Are Djoser's and Croatian pyramids. And the strange pyramid-looking structures in Antarctica. 

If Eldorado is meant for the highest-class priests it can be anywhere. The form for the Eldorado can be different than we think. Maybe it's the room where those priests could speak freely without the need afraid of punishments. 

See also: 

Pharaoh

Djoser's pyramid

Machu Picchu

South American Pyramids

https://shorttextsofoldscholars.blogspot.com/

Can Chat GPT replace Google? The story of "productive" AI.

  

Image: Pinterest

Machine learning is the ultimate tool. But we are still far away from systems that are learning like a human. In the simplest model. Learning machines record the environment, and then the human user just stores those things for future use. Then the next time, the AI can automatically adjust the system by using those recorded values. So humans are needed for making the pilot case. And then, the system just repeats that case in the cases that follow the first one. 

When we think of AI as an artist. We can select a couple of paintings from the net for the AI's database. Then the AI can simply share those images with three or more areas. And that it will connect those areas to the "new" painting. There is a possibility. That the number of stripes depends on the number of selected paintings or other images.  

And then, the AI will take the top area from the first painting, the second area from the second painting, etc. So AI is not producing anything new. It just recycles the old one. 

Chat GPT-type artificial intelligence will take Google's position someday in the future. The thing that this system requires is a good database, and also it must learn to read. When people are using Chat GPT they accumulate its database about the homepages. But the problem with the AI is that it doesn't know what is reading on those home pages. It can use Google search and find a series of home pages about certain topics. But I think that still today. 

It uses the homepages  Google indexed or some other search engine. Then it simply connects the paragraphs from the page and makes new homepages by using that data. When we want to simulate the AI way to handle data in a real-life physical environment. We can give the keywords to some child who writes them to address the line. 

Then that child who doesn't speak English selects five first pages from the list. And then that child copies the first paragraph from the first page. The second paragraph from the second page, the third paragraph from the third page, etc... That thing means that the result can be perfect. But it can also be horrible. 

The thing that makes AI problematic is that it uses only homepages that are enlisted for it. The system can search certain words from those pages and select paragraphs there are involving most of those words. But the problem is that the system cannot read. So the results still need human controllers. Or they are full of fatal errors. And I would not use AI for my doctoral thesis. 

The AI can check the computer's programming code. It can see are variables used. Or it can see are variables written right. In that case, it just compiles the list of variables and the line that the programmer is made. If there is a variable, that looks like some certain variable, the system suggests how the programmer should write the variable's name. 

In that process, the AI searches for details from those variables. It will see if there are similarities in the names and text that is written in the editor. This is one of the reasons why all variables must have unique names that are easy to separate from each other. 

When AI controls things like chemical processes there are many ways how to make that system learn. The simplest model is to make the chemical test in the laboratory. And the system just records the conditions like relations in gas mixtures and temperature in the chemical environment. 

If the maker of the experiment is satisfied that person just stores the result on the computer. And then the system can automatically adjust the system by using those values for the next case. But if the system uses scanning laser microscopes or something like that it can follow the trajectories of the components. 

https://shorttextsofoldscholars.blogspot.com/

AI doesn't create new things. They just recycle old ones.

Even the best AI cannot generate a thing. It just recycles old ones. When we think about paintings. And other things that AI. The truth is that it only connects details from sources that somebody else made. In real life, it connects information or details from multiple sources. The number of sources determines how effective and smooth results the AI can create.

The weakness is that the AI doesn't understand what it does. Productive AI like Chat GPT selects a certain number of sources by using the search engine's results. Then the AI just select one or two paragraphs from those homepages and connects them to a new entirety. 

And here is the danger. The AI doesn't know what is reading in those paragraphs. The thing is that the AI recognizes the paragraphs. But because it doesn't know what is reading in those paragraphs. The AI can choose something that doesn't belong to any topics in the text. That means AI is far away from human intelligence.  

So do we need scholars in the time of AI? The answer is that humans still in a vital role in machine learning. The AI can even collect thesis from homepages that human is prechecked. AI can play chess better than humans because it can calculate possible movements so far ahead. The AI can fly aircraft closer to the ground than humans because it doesn't afraid.

It just needs two or four radars that can fly in canyons. And of course, GPS and map where is the profile of the canyon. The radar altimeter can measure the aircraft's distance to the ground. And side radars tell the distance to walls. 

The nose radar sees the possible obstacles. But that thing is not anything there the AI creates new things. An interesting thing about AI is that self-driving car requires more complicated code than drone needs. 

The learning AI can learn multiple canyon profiles. It just records the aircraft's route. When we make self-driving cars, they need much more variables than robot aircraft needs for a successful mission. 

Every variable is an object that the system must recognize. The AI-driven car simply stops the vehicle and says that the driver must use the manual system in city areas. The AI can make many complicated-looking things, but all those things that AI knows must be pre-program in its memory. Otherwise, AI is ineffective. 

But when we think about the future and autonomously learning AI, we must realize one thing. The human brain requires information that it uses for connecting memory blacks. 

The problem is this. We don't know the precise moment when the data collection begins. 

The human brain involves 86-500 billion neurons. Calculating those neurons is difficult because of things like the number of axons. And the ability to interconnect neurons together has a great effect on the brain. The number of connections between neurons is the same way important. As the number of physical neurons. 

https://shorttextsofoldscholars.blogspot.com/

Gravitation and its connection with strong nuclear interaction is the key element in the GUT (Grand Unified theory)

The thing, that makes gravitation interesting is that it affects all particles in a similar way. Gravitation is also interesting because it is neutral. And that makes some researchers believe that the "Atomos" is real. There is the possibility that all particles are involved in the same particle or structure. So gravitation is the effect that affects those yet unknown particles. Maybe those particles are hypothetical graviton particles. 

In some theories, the graviton and gluon are the same particles. In those models, gluon is a fast-rotating particle like a small-size pulsar between quarks. So when the jet from those fact-rotating particles that can be the quantum size black hole is sending radiation simultaneously. It causes the effect where quarks are pulling and pushing each other. 

In that model graviton is an extremely small particle. That causes interaction in the area that is an extremely small part of the quark. 

There are two forms of that model. 

1) Gluon is rotating like the quantum jet from its poles hits horizontally to the quark. In that model the position of the hypothetical graviton particle is recumbent. The graviton particle's poles face quark. And then they are turning away. And that thing causes the electromagnetic or quantum vacuum between quarks. 

2) Graviton is an object whose position is stable. So the poles of the graviton are turning to quarks. And then the area where that jet impacts the quark is very small. The thing that causes the pulling effect is the quantum shadow or electromagnetic low pressure around that energy tube. That thing causes a weaker but larger area-pulling effect on the quarks. 

And if that thing is the radiation what that gravitation sends will sometimes hit the superstring that forms the quark. So if that kind of model is true the gravitational interaction is the same force that changes its form when it travels through atoms. 

The four fundamental interactions are. 

1) Strong nuclear force 

2) Weak nuclear force

3) Electromagnetism 

4) Gravitation

So the thing that makes people believe in the GUT (Grand Unified Theory) is that they all seem to be the same force. The anti-gravitation is not found. And making sure that this theory is right is difficult. The thing is that these kinds of theories are theories until they are proven. The thing that makes GUT real is finding the mysterious graviton. Without that particle, that thing is just theory. 

The idea of the GUT Grand Unified theory is simple. 

1) Strong nuclear force is the wave motion in which the source is in gluons. Then that force travels to quark. Strong nuclear interaction or strong nuclear force is the interaction between quark and gluon. 

That quark transforms the wavelength of strong nuclear interaction to interaction that interacts with the quantum field around three quarks (and some other particles). 

2) That structure is called hadrons. The hadrons, their quantum field is transforming the wavelength of that wave motion to the thing that is called weak nuclear interaction. 

3) Electromagnetic interaction is the interaction between the nucleus of the atoms and their electrons. The harmonic oscillation of all quantum fields of the nucleus of the atoms sends the energy to the electron cores. And electrons are repelling each other. 

4 Then the electron cores are sending the wave motion out from the atom. 

So the GUT theory describes all fundamental forces as one force. The particles are the transformers that are transforming the wavelength of that force. 

The model of the GUT is that all those things from the strong nuclear interaction to gravitation are wave motion. When that wave motion travels through the atom from the smallest to the largest. Its wavelength changes. The origin of the wave motion is in the particles that are known as gluons. When that wave motion travels through the particles. Its wavelength changes. 

At first, the wavelength of that wave motion is the same as the size of the gluon. Then that wave motion impacts the quark. The resonating quarks send wave motion. That has the same wavelength as the size of the quark.

Then that wave motion travels through the proton impacts to the electron cores. And finally, after that, the resonance travels out from the atom. The thing that supports this model is that the size of the atom determines the wavelength of the emission radiation. This thing makes spectroscopy possible. 

The thing that causes different wavelengths of the different atoms is the size of the electron core. The electron core sends the radiation. So that means there is the possibility that (we can think) all interactions or fundamental forces are the same force that has different states. That means the different size particles are acting as the transformers that are just transforming the force or its transporting wave motion to another one. 

The robotic movement in curved space defies the laws of standard physics.

"Researchers have proven that when bodies exist in curved spaces, they can move without pushing against something" 

(ScitechDaily.com/Robotic Motion in Curved Space Defies Standard Laws of Physics)

The thing that when something moves in curved space without touching anything is an amazing thing. When an object touches something energy moves between that thing or our main object. And that means energy flow between quantum systems continues until the energy level between those systems is at the same level. The problem is that the wave motion have also a similar form to the regular particles. 

So the energy can flow away from the quantum system when it just touches some kind of wave motion. The thing that denies crossing the speed of light is the energy flow away from the accelerating object. That thing happens when the speed, and at the same time the mass of the object increases. 

When the speed and same time the kinetic mass of the object increases spacetime turns shorter. A similar effect is seen near black holes. But the difference between the moving object like a spaceship and the black hole is that the black hole pulls quantum fields inside it. The spacecraft must travel against a stable quantum field. 

Whenever the spacecraft travels through the quantum field energy has two possibilities. It can travel to our hypothetical spacecraft. Or it can travel out from the spacecraft. When energy travels out from spacecraft acceleration ends. 

But the curving space makes it possible that particles can travel ahead without touching anything. That thing means that nothing limits the speed of the object. If the curvature of space is high enough the object can travel between wave motion without touching it. Or the speed of the wave motion and photons is the same when energy transfer doesn't happen.  

The thing is that if a particle will not touch anything there is the possibility that it starts to vaporize. The particle will be discharged backward. Even if the nose or the front side of the particle will not allow the escape of the wave motion. There is the possibility that the superstrings are starting to discharge backward. 

By the way, there is one interesting vision about the gravitational engine. 

Curving space has given an idea for the gravitational engine that falls in the gravitational pothole. That engine would be like a propeller that falls in the wave motion and rotates horizontally or vertically. The idea is that the wave motion touches that propeller and because the energy level in both ends of the system is different than system causes energy flows backward in that system.

Or even a long antenna is enough in the case when gravitational energy is beneficial near the black hole. The idea is that the energy flows from the nose of the antenna which is in the higher energy level to the back which is in the lower energy level. 

The gravitational waves maybe not be possible to use themselves. But the wave motion that they are pulling inside the black hole can use to make the energy. Theoretically, the antenna that is put in the transition disk could give enough energy for the entire planet. 

 In some versions of this futuristic idea, the long body of the spacecraft is enough. And when the nose of the craft falls through the event horizon the body of the craft conducts energy out from the black hole or near it. 

https://scitechdaily.com/georgia-tech-researchers-defy-standard-laws-of-physics/

Researchers created a new type of hypothetical neutron star.

Researchers created a new type of hypothetical neutron star. 

The new type of theoretical form of neutron stars is the star collision. In that case, the colliding stars would form the neutron stars. But there is also a second theoretical way that makes neutron stars form. The idea is that if the interplanetary nebula collapses. 

And the nebula's mass is between the limit of the white dwarf and black hole that thing can also make forming of neutron stars possible. And the third way might be that when white dwarfs are pulling material to them their mass will increase to the level that the white dwarf will collapse to neutron stars. 

The possible ways, that can form neutron stars. 

1) Supernova explosion where the star's mass is between the forming of the white dwarf and black hole.

2) The interplanetary nebula that collapses. If the mass of the nebula is between the white dwarf and the black hole that thing can form the neutron star. 

3) Collimation of the stars is forming neutron stars. 

4) The white dwarfs can pull material from other stars, and then their mass will rise until those white dwarfs collapse into neutron stars. 

The thing is that at least supermassive black holes are forming when interstellar nebulas are collapsing. That thing has caused an idea that could it be possible that the gas clouds that are forming stars and planets can also collapse straight to the white dwarfs and neutron stars. That thing is not so imaginational as we first might think. If the interplanetary nebula where is a lot of silicone or carbon collapses. 

That thing can form the carbon star, white dwarf, or neutron star. For creating energy the star requires hydrogen. And there is the possibility that all supernova remnants have no hydrogen. So that makes it possible that condensing nebula that involves very much heavier elements can form white dwarf and neutron stars. As well as, collapsing heavy nebulas can form stellar-mass or supermassive black holes straight away. 

The theory of the new type of neutron star is modeled.

The neutron star is a remnant of the supernova explosion. The star that that mass is too low that it can form a black hole after the supernova explosion but too heavy forming the white dwarf is forming the neutron star. The neutron star is forms purely of neutrons.  

In the neutron stars, all neutrons are in the same direction. They are forming series that are making them act like quantum particle accelerators. And that thing causes the magnetic field around the neutron star to be extremely strong. The magnetic field drives particles that are impacted by neutron stars to its poles, and then they will fly to space and form pulsars. 

The double or maybe triple pulsars are the most powerful actors in the universe. If there is a double star system where are two or more neutron stars. Those neutron stars are turning to a position. Where the opposite poles are against each other. That makes those particles will travel through all neutron stars. That is in that system. 

Those neutron stars act like an extremely powerful particle accelerator. And series of neutron stars are acting as even more powerful particle accelerators. If those energy rays hit any object result could be devastating. 

Sources:

https://phys.org/news/2022-04-astrophysicists-theorize-neutron-star.html

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

The first time researchers created RNA molecules that replicate.

Self-replication of the RNA molecules is making it possible to create artificial organisms. Artificial organisms can use for many purposes. The genetically engineered bacteria can clean the human body from viruses. The idea is that artificial bacteria just eat viruses. And then they will close their ion pumps and die. And travel out of the body. The bacteria would just form the bag where the viruses are captured and then it stops its metabolism. 

Because bacteria are dying it cannot create more viruses. The artificial bacteria can also transform to stem cells by using genome transfer. Also, the bacteria can modify to make artificial retroviruses that can make genome transplant for people who have some kind of genetic disorder. 

But the artificial DNA and RNA molecules can also use for making the new type of nanomachines and artificial molecules. Genetic engineering can make it possible to increase the number of mitochondria in cells. And that thing makes them stronger. 

But artificial lifeforms can be much more complicated than we even think they could. 

There are three ways to benefit genetic engineering and biotechnology for robotics and computing. The size of the biorobot is not limited. And the ways how the robot can use biotechnology are listed here. 

1) Robots can use cloned neurons for making electricity for them. In that case, the electric cells that are making electricity for the animals like electric Eels can use to make electricity for robots. 

In some scenarios, the cells of fungus or vegetables are hybridized with those electric cells. And they can use it to make the electricity for the robots. 

2) The core of the robots can create by using diatomic cells. That thing is making it possible to make the core. That can fix its damages automatically. The bioships might not work in space but things like submarines can use those things. 

3) The robots can use the cloned neural tissue for making decisions. That means those systems have artificial brains that are working like normal brains. The brains that are made by using cloned neurons can use as biocomputers. 

Biological batteries are one of the most interesting targets for use of biotechnology.

The biological battery is the tank where is the cells are producing electricity. Those tanks can connect to series or parallel coupling. And that means the only thing that separates them from chemical batteries is that the electricity is produced in living cells. The electric eel can deliver electricity from 650 to 860 volts. And that kind of electricity can use to move large-size systems. Those cells that deliver that electricity can also be cloned or culture in cell cultures. 

When we think of things like robots that are using biological power sources the size of those robots might be very big. The thing is that the number of those cells determines the voltage that they can deliver.  The electric cells can use to deliver electricity to the mobile telephone as well as the ion engines of the spacecraft. In the last case. Electricity will first load to the battery. Which makes it possible to create high-voltage electricity. 

The thing is that the capacity of those electric cells is the only thing that limits their use. The large-size tanks with electric cells can load electricity to capacitors. And that can increase the voltage of those systems. And maybe someday in the future things like laptop computers can use biological electric cells in their batteries. The cells are needed only nutrients for making electricity. 

https://phys.org/news/2019-09-species-electric-eel-highest-voltage.html

https://scitechdaily.com/new-insight-into-possible-origins-of-life-for-the-first-time-researchers-create-an-rna-molecule-that-replicates/

The target of marketing is always the masses, not individual persons.

In the point of marketing, we would not even want to use personal internet data. The marketing requires the mass-data or data where is listed products, what typical person or lead is using and what they don't use. 

That means the system requires information about masses, not individuals. The individual data turns the databases more complicated than they are without personnel id. Removing the personal data would there be removed on the table from the database. 

And that thing makes them fit to "kiss(ap)" (Keep It So Simple (as Possible))-model. If we think that one character means nothing in databases that might be true. At least, in the cases where we should handle about 100 lines of data. But when we are collecting data for marketing solutions we need data from thousands or even millions of people. 

And that means if there is some personal information, that makes thousands or millions of lines in databases. That means we might want to use some other type of data for aiming for that kind of marketing. We might want to use some tool to collect data from people. So we might want to know what kind of stuff a person like a typical heavy metal listener buys. 

When we profile some persons for marketing we can send those people queries. But the problem is how to make people answer those queries? And, of course, people should be honest while they are filling those queries. The problem is how to motivate people to fill those things? When we are collecting information for the marketing. we should know what kind of person is the typical user of the service. 

In the political world, the politician should know, who is the typical voter? What kind of things do those people value? And Brexit is made by using this method. The Cambridge analytics created the forms where was asked things that typical EU-resistant thinks important. And that thing made possible that Brexit was successful: multiple politicians promised many things. But they had only one common theme. Britain must get out of the EU. 

There are also made scenarios that Russian intelligence. Would make similar operation for breaking NATO. That means the values of the people. Who is criticizing or is against NATO would be mapped. And that thing would channel voted to politicians who are against NATO. In that system, the political campaigns of the politicians would be different. But there is one certain theme, and that is NATO-critics. In that kind of operation, the denial would turn into a synonym for the criticism.

In that case, we are interested in a typical heavy-metal listener, not individual persons. But how we can collect data about the typical people who listen to some kinds of music? We might put the link to the sale card that is shown in some music videos. There might be certain numbers, and by giving those numbers in some net storage the person can buy something small.  

Or they can use that code as a sale card. The data where that sale is used would be stored in databases. The system can collect data about things that those persons buy, what things are their favorite colors, and other kinds of things. The thing is that this thing is called user profiling. The profile of typical users is helping to aim commercials for the homepages. 

https://www.analyticsinsight.net/what-is-psychographics-how-can-you-gather-psychographic-data/

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

When we think that something is ordinary, that thing can be very extraordinary.

When we think about things like material we might think that is the most common thing in the universe. The fact is that only we see only about 15% of the universe. And 85 % of the material is invisible to us. So if 15% of the material is visible we must realize that the most common thing in the universe is invisible. And the universe what we see is the very extraordinary thing.

If we are transferring this idea to sociology we are facing an illusion. We believe that all people are similar to us. And that thing brings another illusion to our minds. 

We believe that we are common people. If we make some developing works in some company we believe that every worker in the work-life is a developer. There is the possibility that we know only other developers in our workplace. And that thing causes a certain illusion to us. 

If we are members of some MC club we might believe that all people are members of those MC clubs. We think that some Harley Davidson is the most common hobby in the world. So we are forming our social network from people who are similar to us. There is the possibility that some biker knows only other bikers. 

Another thing is that we are selecting our company from people like us. That's the shame. The thing is that this thing makes our environment monotonic. That thing means that there is no room for other opinions. That makes the environment poor. And when we need many different ideas people who are thinking as we think are causing those ideas are turning similar.

Of course, that thing can seem nice. But when we are innovating something there is needed many different ideas. If every person has the same ideas. That makes the idea of the meeting one-sided. The idea in innovation meetings is to develop new things. And in that process, the focus should be on clients. The users of the application make their choice. They buy the product. And that means there should be a representative of the potential customers in the development team. 

Because we are all similar people in our workplace, we forget who we are creating things. The most common mistake in that process is we are starting to make the product for ourselves. We forget the point of view of the user. When adults are making toys as an example. They are making toys from the point of view of adults. 

They believe that children are mini-size adults. And when adults like something, children like that thing too. Same way when people are developing the things like mobile telephones and something like that. They sometimes forget the conditions where the user uses those products. 

When the person makes things like user interfaces they forget one thing. The developer who is working with that kind of thing certainly finds the right things at the right moment. For the person who is made those user interfaces is easy to find things. Especially when our person is sitting at laboratory or office everything goes right. But have you ever been in a situation where you must buy a bus ticket one minute before the bus is coming in rainy or freezing weather?

The thing is that when the ICT developers are making their job they sometimes forget so-called ordinary people. Their customers might be highly trained people like medical doctors and lawyers. 

Those people can be the most well-educated persons in the world. But they are not ICT specialists. And there is the possibility that when we must find some application in rainy and dark weather, we are in a different situation than the person who tests those things in laboratories. 

What mean to AI to understand?

   

 What mean to AI to understand?

What mean to understand anyway? We can do many things. And we might not understand them. When we are trying to think about the question of what means understanding? We are facing an ultimate question do we still understand anything? The fact is that I can put seven years old child to read the text about quantum physics and that child might read those texts pretty well. But does that child understand those words? The fact is that I can also use the Google text-to-speech application to make that thing. And this application will make its job well. 

The AI can make many things and if that application doesn't know about things like the mark of the sum or something like that. The programmer needs to store the characters of those things on the computer. The mark of the sum will store in the database, and then there will make the text that is connected to that mark. So the sigma-mark will trigger the words that are connected to that mark. 

1) To know means: That a character knows what to do in certain situations

2) Understanding means: To realize why actors must do things in a certain way.

When we are making the robot do something it makes things what we programmed in it. If we want to make a tennis robot that plays tennis with us, we might make a robot that hits the ball. The robot might have gesture control.

If the ball is coming to the robot it will hit it. Then robot must have some algorithms for how it aims at that ball. If the referee will give the pass to the robot, it must know the gesture and then make the pass. Or movement series what makes it pass. The robot must calculate many things like the right hit point and power. But then it might have one problem does it understand anything? 

The pseudo-understanding is that the AI can give pre-programmed answers to certain questions. 

It knows how to react to the ball. And simple gestures that are making the person who sits on the chair.  But could that robot play tennis in a real match? Does it separate the referee from the audience that might show similar gestures? The robot must "know" that it should not follow any other than the referee's marks. So the robot knows how to punch a ball. 

The ball acts as a trigger that activates a certain series of movements. The robot might have orders where the punch must and where the ball should not go. The robot would not strike outside the field, because it's programmed in there. And if somebody asks about why the robot doesn't hit the ball outside the field area, it can answer: "that's dangerous". 

If the programmer is put that answer to robot's computer. Or it might have an answer "that's prohibited" whenever the person asks it to make something that is not programmed in its memory. If somebody asks a robot to punch a ball to humans or vehicles robot might say "it's prohibited" and make a report to its operators. 

The reflex robot recognizes that some action is filling the notes that are stored in the database. After that, the action triggers the database. And then that database begins the response to that action. 

Those actions are programmed in the program of the robot's programs by programmers. The robot does all the time same things. There is a series of triggers that are activated by certain actions. So that robot has a reflex. A certain action activates certain types of reactions. 

The reflex automation is simple to make. When somebody says "good morning" to the computer, it might answer by saying "good morning". And then that computer might have a voice or image scanner that connects a certain workspace to it. If the computer uses an infrared camera or ultrasound-based system. It can also recognize a person. Even if that user has a beard or is in flu. The idea of those deeper-than-surface systems is to benefit the static components of the human body. 

Of course, the system can ask the person to identify self. The command that the operator gives for access to the workspaces. Might be "I'm Eric, open my workspace". In the place of that name is the operator's name. That means the system can also recognize if somebody tries to play as that operator. The system recognizes the face but asks the name of the operator. That uncovers if the person tries to use some other user's accounts. This is one version of artificial intelligence called "reflex automation". 

The thing is that the machine has some kind of model in its memory. When some action fits some models. That thing activates certain actions in the system. This type of system is effective. Artificial intelligence-controlled robots might make many things like activating traffic lights or bringing tea or coffee to certain persons. They know how to respond to some kind of command or action. But those computer programs don't know why that response is given. 

A robot or computer program has a series of reactions to how to react to something. And if something that is outside its databases is asked robot might say "I cannot do that thing". Or it can say that it transmits the problem to the system supervisor who is making an algorithm for that thing. And the time for machine learning starts to dawn. 

https://networkedinternet.blogspot.com/

 New robots bring new tricks.

Robots that emulate fish are more effective than robots that are using propellers. If the robot has similar fins and tails with fish. It won't get stuck to the algae and water vegetables so easily as propellers using robots. The problem with small-size robots is that they have limited power sources. The thing is that also larger nuclear-powered submarines can have fins and structures like pike fish that kind of submarine might have stealth drive along with propellers. 

Structures that are used and tested in miniature submarines. Can turn to use in larger-scale submarines. There is also tested the cuttlefish-looking submarine construction. Those kinds of systems can use water jets for driving fast underwater. 

Then the robot can use those fins in the area where the system needs to operate accurately. Those robots can be of various sizes. And they can use to recover the material from the bottom of the oceans by using manipulator's arms. 

Those little bit spider-looking machines can use to return things like nuclear reactors and secretive things like dropped nuclear bombs in secretive missions. As well as they can use to return chemical waste or something like that. 

The flying man-shaped robots can also be modern technology. The same technology that is created for those systems can also use to lift people. The man-looking flying robots can someday research planets like Venus and Saturn moon Titan. But they can also drop to research the jungles in Papua-New Guinea. 

New technology like large-size quadcopters can use to lift people from the ground. And sometimes is tested the backpack, that has a helicopter structure. The tail rotor would be at the end of the telescope tail. And the main rotor would be in the middle of the backpack. Those kinds of systems have problems with power supply. 

So the quadcopters are easier to control. And they can be connected to the wireless game control sticks. Those systems are almost safe. Because of the battery is ended. That robot can have autorotation mode. The autorotation guarantees that the system can return to the ground safely. 

The quadcopters that are lifting humans can use to land the special operations teams to the ground. And then fly back to VTOL aircraft. The same quadcopters can also rise window cleaners to the roof of buildings. But in the same way, things like burglars can use quadcopters to lift them and their equipment to the roofs of their targets. The fact is that this kind of technology is open source. Everybody can buy a quadcopter from shops. And then the person needs only the employment skills to enlarge that system. 

Italian "iron man robot". (https://www.engadget.com/)

https://interestingengineering.com/cuttlefish-like-robots-are-far-more-efficient-than-propeller-powered-machines

https://networkedinternet.blogspot.com/

The mixed reality is a powerful tool for many things.

The idea of mixed reality is that this kind of system can combine the real world with VR (Virtual Reality). The simplest idea is to make the robot that sends things what it senses to the controller. The robot's eyes would be the camera systems that are connected remotely to the VR glasses. 

The ears of the robot are microphones. And they are sending data to the gamer's headset. The touch sense is the pressure detector that sends the feel of touch to the data gloves. Then the operator can interact with the physical robot.

And that thing allows making safely many things that are very risky for the people. If we are thinking about the cases like nuclear accidents. And sadly battlefields those robots can use many types of communication systems. If the robot is inside the powerful electromagnetic field that can close the radio communication it can change to use laser-led for sharing data. 

There are many types of interfaces that allow robots to operate very effectively. Those systems might be all-time interactive. That system requires non-stop guiding. But there are also learning systems that are making it possible to teach things to robots. In that process, the operators can use the virtual characters. That means the system would look like a computer game. 

Those kinds of systems are things that are recording the actions that the operators are doing. When the operator is made the action the system asks if the operator is satisfied. And of person is satisfied that thing stores those movements and other actions in the system's database.  

The things that are stored in the computer's database determine the skills of the machine. The speech-to-text applications which can dump those texts to the database or interface allow giving spoken orders to the robots. The database can make by using computer-game-type applications. And then the actions that are stored in the database by using the virtual character can download to the robot. 

So the operator can create the necessary action series to the database and then give the name for that action. That word can be "rescue" or "attack". Then the operator can simply give orders to the robot by using the name of that database. If something is forgotten from the action series. Or there is no match in the database for a certain situation. The operator can change to use intensive control like datagloves and joystick. 

https://scitechdaily.com/upgrading-the-space-stations-cold-atom-physics-laboratory-with-mixed-reality/

https://visionsofbrightfuture.blogspot.com/

Who found America part II?

The image I: Leif Erickson's statue in Boston

The founder of America is a mystery. But we know that Cristopher Columbus (1451-1506) was not the first European in America.  Neanderthal people traveled to the North America by following the isthmus that connected North America to Asia. When we are talking about the pre-Columbian journeys to America, we must realize two things. 

1) The journey to America is not the same as the regular journeys. Maybe some pirates visited New World a long time before Columbus. And that could explain why those pre-Columbian explorations are not told to people. That means those pirates or outlaws might rest in that land. And that means they wanted to keep it secret. 

In some other versions, the noblemen hide gold or pieces of jewelry that they stole from the crown to the New World. Out from the eyes of the king. It could mean very big trouble if somebody is caught stealing the king's gold. So the beaches of America could be good places to hide the gold taken without permission. 

2) The new lands were explored and marked to the maps when they were allowed to mark. And permission came from the ruler of the nation. 

So there is the possibility that the explorers put the explorations in storage that they would not cause disappointment for their financial supporters. And maybe those explorers sold the instructions where to find new islands to their friends. So that means that this thing was a very lucrative business. 

 And the main thing is that the maps were not so good during the time of Columbus as they are today. There was a possibility that the ships sailed out from maps. And maybe the skippers were not told that thing to the crew. And if that thing happened in the Atlantic Ocean the ship must only take the course back to east. That maneuver took the ship back to the mapped area very easily. 

Images II and III: Djoser and Yucatan pyramids

Europeans were active in America 1000 years ago claims new studies. The fact is that I presume myself that the Carthaginian admiral Hanno the Navigator (5th century BC) was probably one of the first sailors who might find America. That man lived in the fifth century BC. But the pyramid of Djoser that built during the rule of the pharaoh Djoser (c. 2670–2650 BC).

And its similarity with the Mayan Pyramids in the Yucatan peninsula is giving a tip.  Europeans or Egyptians knew America about 3000-2000 BC. So we cannot say that Columbus found America. The thing is that there is evidence that Leif Erikson (c. 970 – c. 1020) the son of Erik the Red (c. 950 – c. 1003) lived in Newfoundland in c. year 1000. But the thing is that there was suspicion that Leif Erikson was not the first European in America. 

Image IV: The Columbus Voyages to America 

The thing is that the Egyptians, Sumerians, and Phoenicians might travel to America over the Pacific ocean. During those trips, those explorers could benefit the Micronesian archipelago. Or they might travel through the land to Angor Watt and then over the Bering Strait to the new world. So we know that Columbus was not the first man, who saw the New World. 

And in fact, that man ever visited on dry land when he traveled through the Atlantic ocean. There is the theory that Columbus bought the instructions on how to find the new world. And maybe that man once visited the new world before he offered the great exploration for his funders. 

https://scitechdaily.com/move-over-columbus-europeans-were-already-active-in-the-americas-1000-years-ago/

https://www.history.com/topics/ancient-history/pyramids-in-latin-america

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27Anse_aux_Meadows

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Columbus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_the_Red

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanno_the_Navigator

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leif_Erikson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesoamerican_pyramids#:~:text=Mesoamerican%20pyramids%20form%20a%20prominent%20part%20of%20ancient,on%20the%20top%29%20and%20stairs%20ascending%20their%20faces.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Columbian_trans-oceanic_contact_theories

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyages_of_Christopher_Columbus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramid_of_Djoser

Image I:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leif_Erikson

Image II: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramid_of_Djoser

Image III: Pinterest

Image IV:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyages_of_Christopher_Columbus

https://writingsaboutmysteries.blogspot.com/

Quantum tunneling and wormholes

When we are thinking that quantum tunneling makes it possible to cross the speed of light that thing happens because some of the quantum fields that are causing the curving of photons are removed. So the trajectories of photons would be more straightforward than in other places in the universe. This means that the speed of photons would be higher in that area than in other places. Or their trajectories would go straight. Sometimes people say that crossing the speed of light in normal space is "quite easy".

 They must just press the X- or gamma-rays straight or create a photon that moves by using a straight trajectory. And this means that the speed of photons would be higher than other places in the universe. The only way to make the straight moving photon is to remove the quantum fields from the area around the craft. And this makes the photons and maybe electrons move faster than places where quantum fields are affecting their trajectories. 

Could the wormholes be the tunnels through space that are forming straight moving photons and electromagnetic wave movement? So are the wormholes formed by the Hawking radiation? In that case, the radiation channels would connect black holes to the web of the space. If the wormholes are formed by Hawking radiation that will explain why we cannot see them.  

But if the wormholes are formed of Hawking radiation that means they are virtual. The time dilation would affect the particles that are in the radiation channel. But the outside observer sees that the craft which speed is 50% of the speed of light will travel to Alpha Centauri in 8 years. 

In a real wormhole, the observer sees that the object travels to Alpha Centauri in seconds. 

The hypothetical wormholes are quite a similar phenomenon to quantum tunneling. The wormhole or Einstein-Rose bridge is covering the particle when it travels in this energy channel through the universe. The idea is that when the particle or object is traveling in the wormhole the mono frequentist wave movement is protecting the information. 

So the wormhole is the wave movement that has a straight profile. The theory goes like this. The light where the wave movement is pulled straight in the black hole would create the wormhole. When the wave movement is pulled straight. That makes the wormhole invisible. 

The question about wormholes is that why nobody has seen them? The wormholes are interacting with the environment. And the cosmic web might be the material that is accumulated around those invisible energy channels. Even if we cannot see the wormhole itself. 

We can see its interaction with the gas around it. And maybe the cosmic web is the first evidence that the wormholes through the universe could be possible. And then we must say that even if that electromagnetic phenomenon could transport electrons from one place to another. That is not mean that anything else can use that channel. 

The virtual wormholes are the energy channels through space. Those virtual wormholes are formed by X-ray or gamma-ray radiation. 

The virtual wormhole that is made by using laser is also protecting information. The laser ray will cover the electron or some other information carrier inside it. And the information would ride between those waves of the laser ray. This type of thing can use in quantum computers for protecting the qubit inside the system. 

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/black-hole-circling-wormhole-weird-gravitational-waves

https://www.space.com/20881-wormholes.html

Image: https://www.sciencenews.org/article/black-hole-circling-wormhole-weird-gravitational-waves

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

Even the best plan doesn't save the company if it doesn't follow them.

Service is entirety. And all parts of the service must plan well. But putting the plans into practice is also an important thing. If people are not following the plans those plans have no effect. 

So very high-paid consultants can make many reports. They can introduce things but if their customer would not make anything to put them into practice they are just reports that do not affect productivity and profits.

The company is service. That means that all parts of the service must think and plan well. But also the practical application in service and other things is the important thing. The practical service is the thing that impresses the customer. 

The service design of the company should be the dynamic entirety. The workspace, crew, and technical equipment must work for making the pleasing and good service experience. If some of those parts are missing or are not working well that means the service is bad.  And the entirety is not working and the service doesn't leave a good taste. 

Slow internet connections are the main reason why people are choosing another service. But if the homepages are working fine and the thing that is in those pages is the pleasing customer. That person would come into the company and in that case, the good experience of service is the thing that is needed for making a person buy the product. 

The worst mistake that the workers who are working in customer service must realize is that there are sometimes difficult customers. There is always some reason why the customer is difficult. And in some cases, the reason is that the customer wants to buy a large number of the service. When some difficult customer comes into the hotel and wants to see rooms there is a possibility that the person wants to make the business meeting with a large company for selecting the meeting with the prime contractor and its subcontractors for some large-size building sites. 

And in that kind of case, there might need for many rooms. But anyway, even in the case of regular customers the difficult customer always has some reason for being difficult. 

The offerer of the service is responsible that the service people are handling their job. And the thing is that the service crew is not always responsible for bad things. The leaking pipes are not the fault of the cleaners. The company should know what kind of people they are hiring. They should interview people who want to work in that company. 

If we are honest we should understand that if the person who is serving us at the service desk doesn't speak our language that thing is not that person's fault. The company has recruited that person and they should know that there is a language problem. The responsibility to check the qualification of the employees is the offerer of the service. So this is the thing that we should realize when we are getting service. If the raw materials what the company uses are bad even the best masters cannot save that concept. 

But the problem is that the service is entirety. And in some cases, the service that people are buying looks nice. But then there is a problem that the service packages are medley, collected around one big concept. That means there is one well-thought service and then some auxiliary concepts that are not thought so well. In that case, the offerer of the service just hopes that nobody uses the auxiliary services. One of the best examples is the bars that are selling alcohol and food. In that case in the permit application is put that the main product is the food. 

But somehow the main service is turning to sell drinks. In that case, the raw material of the food is getting old. And in that case, the owner must just hope that nobody order food.  But there is the possibility that sometimes some people are buying food like hot dogs. And if the material of the food is not so good as it should be there is a problem. In that case, making the hot dog can take a very long time. 

https://networkedinternet.blogspot.com/

Is gravitation the same way radiation or wave movement with radio and X- and gamma-rays? And could we position gravitation in the electromagnetic spectrum?

The question in gravitational waves: is gravitation wave movement? 

Two hypotheses might explain the gravitational waves. 

Hypothesis 1) Gravitation and gravitational waves are similar phenomena to light. That means the gravitation has the particle and wave movement forms like all other natural forces. 

So is gravitation electromagnetic radiation or wave movement like the X-and gamma rays and radio waves? And where we would position that wave movement in the electromagnetic spectrum? The problem with this model is that the gravitational waves are so weak. 

Is the wavelength of that radiation so different than others that we can observe only the part of it? And is gravitation the medium between dark and visible energy? That means that gravitation has a similar interaction with other forces. But gravitation requires so large a layer that it feels weak. 

Hypothesis 2) Gravitational waves are the energy load that is transmitting between atoms. When energy is impacting an atom its weight is increasing. And then that atom resends that energy to other atoms. 

 Is gravitation the same way radiation or wave movement with radio and X- and gamma-rays? And could we position gravitation in the electromagnetic spectrum?

The gravitational waves from the neutron star mergers are one of the most important things in the history of research on gravitational waves. Every single particle in the universe transmits gravitational waves. But we can observe only the most powerful of them. During the colliding, they are sending the energy wave through the universe in all frequencies. 

That energy wave is similar to the sound wave that is sent when the stone hits to rock. The flash in the collision of the neutron star is bright but during the collision. The energy is released also in the X-and gamma rays. And the most mysterious things released in those collisions are the gravitational waves. Sometimes I have thought that could the gravitation be the radiation that has its place somewhere in the electromagnetic spectrum? 

In that case, the gravitation is the radiation like gamma and X-rays. But where is the place of that radiation in the electromagnetic spectrum? This is the thing that could be the key to prove that all four natural forces are the forms of the same force. The thing is that gravitation is energy like strong and weak nuclear forces and electromagnetism.

When we are using the energy we are transforming other energy sources to electromagnetism that is used in our electric network. We are using weak nuclear force in the nuclear reactors. 

And the hydro plants transform gravitational energy into electromagnetism. We cannot use pure gravitational energy. But we can transform it to electromagnetism by using turbines and generators. 

https://scitechdaily.com/bayesian-inference-for-gravitational-waves-from-binary-neutron-star-mergers-in-3g-observatories/

()https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

It's the end of the rainbow

It's the end of the rainbow

Kimmo Huosionmaa

My dear readers, I have almost forgotten to write in these sites of the Blogger, and the reason is, that sometimes it's time to renew. I know that this might be feel or hear something, what I have written earlier. The blogger is a good platform and I would ever leave it. I have many feelings about this platform, and one is, that I published my first blog writing in here sometimes around ten years ago.

That writing was caused very positive feedback, and I started to write things first once in the month, but then more often. There are many people, who don't like this kind of texts, but then I must say, that I don't either like every persons or text, what I see, and maybe somebody is interested about this way of seeing the things. I have also right to dislike some person or texts.

First I was hiding my name for some reasons, what are only in my knowledge. But then I got more courage because of the positive feedback, what I got from my friends and other people. And I really believe that writings can change the world. The pen is the more powerful weapon than any gun, and this is the thing, what I learned from some book, what handled propaganda. The words are making motive to defend own ideology, and thoughts.

There have been happened many things after that, and the Blogger is not the only blog service in the world.  Here I mean, that sometimes it' very interesting to start with a new platform, as I have written many times before. And there is one thing, the new platform is not connected to one browser, so that is easier to handle. But don't worry I will sometimes continue to write also in here.

Of course, there is the possibility, that I will someday return to write texts here, but now "when inspiration strikes" the thing, what you might know is the primary area for my texts. But as you see, that there is the possibility, that I will someday return, and while waiting for that day, you might find my writings from the blogs, what are linked below the text. So see you there, and sometimes I will say, that may be in some day, I will start to write here again. And actually, if I would not update here something for a while, you might see my other blogs, what are linked to below the text.

There is one thing about publishing. Sometimes somebody doesn't like texts, what is written, and the thing is, that person who writes blogs cannot use only one service. There is always the possibility, that somebody would get angry about this kind of writings, and then the blog might face the censorship, what means that it can be denied, or getting to that work space might be make harder. And this is the thing, why sometimes must person change the platform, where the texts have been published.

https://wordpress.com/view/historiaajapolitiikkaa.wordpress.com

http://luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com

https://jotkutasiatvainkiehtovatihmisia.wordpress.com

https://travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com

https://wordpress.com/view/menneisyydenhaamut.home.blog