AI’s advancement turns slower.

    AI’s advancement turns slower.

Growing accuracy requires more complicated code. That causes a situation where AI’s advancement slows. When developers created some pseudo-AI tool in a couple of hours in the 1980s, those programs required about 10-50 lines of code. Those programs asked “what's your name?” and then they output the name that the user gave. Then they might ask, “Is the sun shining”? And then the user could answer “yes” or “no”. Then the program replied with something that gave good things in the user’s mind. Today, AI algorithms require billions of code lines. And that causes a situation where the advancement slows. 

So, when accuracy grows in program advancement slows. 

AI’s advancement turns slower. When its accuracy grows. And that means the AI follows the line of the limits in mathematics. Term limits mean the equation that’s the curve approaches zero endlessly. But that curve never reaches zero. If we translate this mathematical equation into an AI model, we can say that when AI approaches human level, the advancement slows down. Maybe. The AI will never reach a complete human level for programmers, but it will reach a level that is almost human-level intelligence. So the base elements in the AI are easy to make.

Then, researchers should find something more accurate. At the same time, they must find new, complicated ways to train their AI. And that means there is a need for more complicated algorithms. Those algorithms require more power, more time, and more accuracy. This means that the programmers use more and more time. That developers can  create more complicated code for algorithms. And how they should react. When accuracy grows. The sector of their algorithm can work turn smaller in the same time. When the need for accuracy grows, the speed of programming slows. 

And the next thing is that the error detection must be at a level where the system can be trusted. Another thing. What slows AI’s advancement is the calculation power. The system needs the entire data center for every query. That means the system needs so much calculation power that developers have no money to buy the systems that they need. Complicated code requires high-power, very high-accuracy systems. And when the system requires lots of capacity for the smallest duties. 

That causes a situation where the developers don’t have time to use AI as they need. When some details keep the system busy, it has no time to drive new code. Complicated code requires a complicated- and long-term error-detection process. The human coder cannot check even billions of lines of computer code. The entire human lifetime is not enough for that process if the human coder wants to make that thing without automated tools. 

When the most advanced tool becomes the enemy of advance.

Why...

Above this text is the image that is not made by using AI. I took that image yesterday evening. That thing required a little bit of trouble and time. Walking into that point, taking my cell phone, and taking that picture took time. When I looked at that picture I realized why people use AI in many things. AI offers easy things to get the job done. That easy tool allows people to make thousands of lines of code in minutes. 

That is possible if the person uses some code libraries. And that makes a person effective. But that thing is not good for advancement and innovation. Also, that way of making programs is not good for data security. If some hackers get those code libraries that allow them to break the systems those codes are used. 

We know that thing. But we ever ask why person makes that thing? Why does that person use libraries and copy-paste? Why that person uses code, that somebody gave to the hard disk? The answer is this something forces a person to make things like that. The nice, well-done code in the hard disk makes work effective. And we can say that generative AI, large LLM, or whatever we call that thing is only to those libraries. 

We can be effective and always use that method to make things. That can make an impression. But then we can say that this method doesn't allow us to advance our programming skills. And that means the AI kills productivity and skills. But is the AI guilty? 

Do we bark the wrong tree? Should we prosecute the need to be effective for that thing? People use AI and code libraries because they have no time to learn things. People are so hurry, that they have no time to learn things. And if they make mistakes they are fired. That forces people to use AI. 

The biggest problem with algorithms is they use existing information. They don't call any telescopes or particle accelerators to create experiments that they can produce new things. They just seek existing information and reorder it. If we start to use AI more and more to become effective we are facing situations in which we don't get new innovations. 

New innovations are things that make the world more advanced. But when we make innovation. We process thought into the product. Without thought is not innovation. Because our mind is to bind to memories we are in trouble with new things.  That means we should create a mind that is not dependent on memories. But that thing is not very easy to make. Almost everything that we make is bound to memories. 

Algorithms do not create things. They just connect existent data into new entirety. And the question is this: do we let ourselves turn into the AI's? Mechanical minds can search existing information but cannot create anything new. 

If we don't let people innovate that means that we will not create new things. Innovations require time and space. And that thing is not a thing that fits into the idea of productivity and effectiveness. 

Algorithms are tools that make many things faster than humans. That is the reason why we use them. The question is always this: do we someday make algorithms that rule people? When we make things by using algorithms we can find an easy way to make things. Algorithms make our lives easier. They search for things from databases. Then, AI can make many things better than we can. We are afraid. That AI helps people to make things. 

Like fake doctoral theses. We are always afraid of that. People lose their creativity when they use AI. We ever ask why we leave our work to the AI. We see that things happen, never asking "why"? 

The problem with the algorithm is that AIs don't make anything new.  They just collect information from the networks. AIs build new entireties using information. That already exists. And that is the problem with AI. The problem is that the system requires effective working. During working days people don't cheer programmers and other people to make new decisions. The requirement for effectiveness is the thing that destroys creativity and advancement. 

People are afraid of remote working because it destroys innovation. But how many hours in week do we use for innovations? Do we really make innovations in our offices? Or do we just read newspapers and reports and make things that have been made 1000 times before? 

Many people think. That innovation is the case, where one person talks and the other listens. The problem with innovation and creativity is that people are afraid of failure. Failure is somehow a non-accepted thing, and that means we make many times things that we made many times before. 

Because. People are afraid of things like grammar mistakes they think that they must let the AI make their texts. Programmers are afraid of mistakes.  Fixing mistakes steals their and other worker's working time. That is the reason why the working environment forces people to use AI. And that is the best way to destroy productive thinking and innovation. 

The AI makes people look like effective. But that system uses only existing information. That is the limit of the AI. Even if we want to make images using AI, we must give orders to it. The AI is like the drawing program that follows orders that we give. That allows us to create new worlds. But that thing doesn't advance our painting skills. 

The memory makes humans effective. Imagination is the thing that connects memory bites together new way. That allows us to create new things. Memories and the connections with existing memories are the things that limit the imagination. The requirement for innovation is an idea, that doesn't come from emptiness. 

Memories are stored in our memory cells. When we use imagination we just reorder those things that we can call memory pixels into the new entirety. Those things are like puzzles that we can reorder. 

The big advance would be the mind. That is not connected with memory. The memory-independent mind is something that we cannot imagine. We use memories to create new entities. And it's hard to even imagine a tool that doesn't use memories. That thing is the tool that can make the next step for innovations and society. 

China develops a new submerging attack drone.

Flying submarine is coming to reality. Chinese military develops a new drone that can operate underwater and under airborne conditions. The system's weight is 7,8 tons. And it's developed with electro-optical systems, synthetic aperture radars, and antiship weapons. The wingspan of that unmanned drone is about 20 meters. 

The details of that system are: "The unmanned aircraft features a wingspan of 20.5 meters, has a maximum takeoff weight of 7.8 tons, and is capable of carrying a wide range of payloads, including electro-optic systems, synthetic aperture radar, early warning radars, electronic reconnaissance systems, air-to-ground missiles and bombs, anti-radiation missiles and loitering munitions." (https://americanmilitarynews.com/China developed flying submarine drones to cripple warships: Report)

The quadcopters and other drones that can operate underwater and airborne are not new. Those drones can slip into the closed area and search for interesting things. 

Recon drones can eavesdrop on buildings by using laser microphones. And film computer screens. But those drones can also be armed. They can use to destroy electronics or eliminate enemy commanders. 

Even a pizza-delivery drone can turn into a lightweight attack device very easily. The operators must replace pizza boxes with remote-operating rocket launchers. And that kind of system can offer deadly surprises. Maybe they are not so effective in the battle zone. But actors like drug cartels might use that kind of system. 

The fact is that drones are a great opportunity but they are also a big threat to security. The tinderbox-size drone can equip with small-caliber guns. And those kinds of extremely small drones are hard to detect. Operators can throw that drone from a high-flying cargo plane and that kind of system can pass the security of the targets very easily. Operators can control those drones over the internet. And they can be thousands of kilometers away from the operating zones.  

/2022/08/china-developed-flying-submarine-drones-to-cripple-warships-report/

Image: https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/pakistan-military-claims-to-have-shot-indian-quadcopter/article62031705.ece

https://designandinnovationtales.blogspot.com/

Synthetic AI-controlled evolution and remote-controlled robots predicted in Stanislaw Lem's novel "Peace on Earth"

New artificial intelligence can develop itself by using Darwinian style evolution. When we think about autonomous synthetic AI-controlled evolution we must remember that modern computing systems are much more powerful than ever before. 

The new complicated AI-based algorithms can search things from the Internet. That allows them to develop themselves. And that thing can make those systems more powerful and more unpredictable than ever before. 

The model of AI-controlled evolution is not quite new. Stanislaw Lem's Novel "Peace on Earth" is one of the darkest predictions about robotics. The theme of that book is that the data networks that are out of control will start to develop new types of systems that are not under nobody's control. 

The novel is telling about a world where is peace. And the weapons are transported to the Moon. But there the systems that have artificial intelligence that can create the intelligent AI-controlled evolution that can create the systems that people cannot predict. And there is another thing that makes this novel very interesting. The thing is called "mixed reality". The "mixed reality" means the robots that are controlled through virtual reality or BCI (Brain-computer Interface). In that novel, those robots are part of everyday life. 

Those robots can use for remote sex. Or the controllers can use those robots as remote bank robbers. The new remote-controlling systems make it possible to use remote-controlled robots for surgical operations. They are planned to use as rescue operators or remote-controlled commando squads. But when robots are coming more common. They might get in the hands of outlaws. 

The AI-controlled machine evolution is possible to make by using existing technology. The combat systems are the easiest to use as an example for the products that are developed by using AI. 

There are three parts to this system. The names for those systems are taken from the novel "Peace on Earth". But before we are going to think about the model of that system. We must understand that the artificial intelligence-based development system can create two things separately or together. 

The AI can develop the physical system itself. Or it can develop the operations of the physical system. In that case, the system selects the most successful actions. In the case of combat drones, that thing can mean the longest operational time against the manned aircraft. Or it can develop them together. But the development system can consist of three different parts. 

1) The super simulator. The system creates virtual aircraft. Or some other system for making the simulated combat against the virtual enemy. 

2) The selective simulator. That simulator goes combat against that virtual system. If the super simulator loses the selective simulator will send the report to the super simulator that knows why its system loses. And then super simulator can make repairments for the product. 

3) The "judge". The system would search which system handles the situation best. Then the "judge" will send the winning model to the selective simulator. Then the super simulator will start to develop a system that can win the last model. So the systems are playing ball with the products. 

This system emulates human brains. And that thing makes it very effective especially if it uses quantum computers. 

That makes this kind of system very effective. Quantum computers can run complicated and heavy artificial intelligence tools. 

The super- and selective simulators are big brains. And the "judge" is the cerebellum. That system's purpose is to select the best of the products. 

The system can collect data from systems. And see what is best in the business. And use that data for making an even better system. 

The researchers are creating new and effective ways to control robots. And some of those methods are basing the cortex simulation. That means the user of the robots cannot make the difference of the robot's senses. Or the senses of the own body. Those systems can be the salvation. Or they can be the worst nightmare that mankind ever created. 

https://bigthink.com/the-present/automl/#Echobox=1646283803

https://techxplore.com/news/2022-03-human-robot-interaction-merging-reality-robotics.html

The demon core

The film above this text introduces the case where the extra energy that the friction of the screwdriver caused a chain reaction in plutonium ball and radioactive accident at Los Alamos laboratory in 1945. That case was one of the most terrifying visions of what the extra energy can cause in the plutonium. There is suspicion that the "Demon Core". Is used to make the radiological weapon that can send radioactive bursts many times. 

That it is possible made the radiological weapon that bases the friction. When the rotating speed of the plutonium ball increases there is something that causes friction that plutonium sends a burst of radioactive radiation. The researchers can make the same effect by hitting the plutonium ball with a hammer. When an enemy approaches that system increases the radiation in the area. So warming of the fission stage is enough to detonate nuclear weapons. 

In the modern versions, there is the possibility that the fission bomb can detonate also by using laser rays. The laser system would increase the temperature of the fission material. And the thing will decrease the critical mass. 

These types of weapons are called sub-critical systems. The fission will be assisted by using electromagnetic radiation which increases the temperature and energy load in the fission material. In some early versions, the fission stage would warm up by using acetylene flame. 

Image ) High-yield thermonuclear detonation "Castle Romeo" (11Mt.) March 26, 1954 (Wikipedia, Castle Romeo)

Sub-critical nuclear weapons are small-size fission systems. Those weapons can use independently. 

But they can also detonate small neutron bombs. Neutron bombs are small fusion or hydrogen bombs. Those systems can use to create neutrons for modern FFF (Fission-Fusion-Fission) weapons. Hydrogen bombs need the fission stage for detonation. The problem with plutonium is that metal is extremely expensive. And one version of the system that can release needed neutrons that detonate the fusion stage is the neutron bomb. 

And they are sending powerful neutron bursts while they are detonating. Those neutrons can conduct to the natural uranium stick. In the hydrogen bombs, the purpose of that stick is to turn to plutonium and detonate the fusion stage. 

They don't require so much uranium. And they can use as the trigger for hydrogen bombs. The fusion stage itself detonates when the neutrons hit the natural uranium stick. When fast neutrons impact the U-238 isotope they turn that thing to Pu-239. And that stick detonates the fusion stage.

Thermonuclear weapon "Alarm clock"("Hydrogen" or "fusion bomb") or Teller-Ulam-construction"

Image 2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermonuclear_weapon

Why "Castle Bravo" was too powerful? 

Why 15 megaton "Castle Bravo" was 1,5 times more powerful than its calculated power was? The reason for that was the weapon that detonated in Eniwetok Atoll on March 1, 1954, was warm. Creators of that sold-stage thermonuclear weapon made the calculations for the cryogenic state. And the extra energy stored in the warm lithium-fusion stage caused the Castel Bravo to be more powerful than it should be. And that thing caused radioactive fallout and other damages across the Eniwetok and its neighbor atoll. 

The implosion system that detonates the nuclear bomb is a hammer that increases energy in plutonium bites. Normally the detonation is made by detonating the conventional explosives around the plutonium bite. The increasing energy level detonates the nuclear weapon. The fission bomb is acting as the spark plug in the hydrogen bombs. 

A hydrogen or fusion bomb is a system where is a stick made of natural uranium in the middle of the chamber where is lithium. When the plutonium bomb detonates. That detonation sends neutrons to the U-238 stick. And that neutron burst detonates the fusion stage. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Bravo

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Castle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermonuclear_weapon

Image 1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Romeo

Image 2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermonuclear_weapon

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

Let's talk about UFO:s part III (Is this mythical F-19 or TR-3B and is F-19 (SR-72) actually the same aircraft as TR3B?)

(Picture 1)

Let's talk about UFO:s part III (Is this mythical F-19 or TR-3B and is F-19 actually the same aircraft as TR3B?)



Kimmo Huosionmaa



In the picture above the text is a craft, what is mentioned very large. Making the analyze of the craft what is in this picture is very difficult because there is nothing, what can be used to compile the size of this object. So it might be actually quite small, and it might be closer than the observer even thinks. I think that this could be some secret drone- or manned aircraft project. Term "secret" means that this thing is not introduced to the public audience.


If the TR3B "Astra" really exists and that would use nuclear power, there would also be the versions of that plane, what uses conventional turbines. Those versions might use for training that pilots could study the affections about this plane before they would get the nuclear-powered model in their hands. And here I must ask is TR-3B the same plane as "Aurora" or F-19? Here I'm asking is F-19 changed name as SR-72, if the plane is meant to replace the SR-71 "Blackbird?


The shape of this object is similar with STEALTH-plane F-19, what was claimed the most secret aircraft in the world. There was ever proven that this aircraft even existed, but it is claimed to be a combat model of mysterious ”Aurora” aircraft. But this object would be actually quite small, and it could be one of the many drones, what are developed in the United Kingdom and the United States for reconnaissance and combat missions.


Maybe this is the "Robo Falcon", what might have extra jet engines, what thrust to the downwards for VTOL (Vertical Take-Off and Landing) missions. The stories of F-19 were stopped when USAF gave F-117 in public and confessed that they had STEALTH airplanes. But many persons believed that this hired much bigger secrets because the shape of F-117 didn't match for the observations of mystery plane, what is flown only in the night. So I must ask again could F-19 be the same aircraft than top secret SR-72? And is that plane ever flown is the different thing. Maybe it was studying project of studying the hypersonic technology, whoever knows the truth.


There would be normal jet motors in backward and different motors for vertical take off. The same models, what are created for those experimental aircraft could be used as the new era of cruise missiles. Some of those missiles would launch via orbiter, and they can use SCRAMJETS for hypersonic flight. The antibody missiles would be like small space shuttles, and I personally think that they are STEALTH-versions of X37B. The cruise missiles of tomorrow could have the capacity to "levitate" on the skies, and wait for orders to attack. And the same models could be used in many aerial vehicles, drones,  manned airplanes and space shuttles.


So the size of that plane could be similar that Mercedes car and those drones can be used to test the models of full-sized fighter military fighters or fighter-bombers. The flying models are easier to hide from the public eye than full-size aircraft. And remote controlled aircraft would not uncover by its pilots who have no need to know, what kind aircraft does this person control.


Sometimes I have thought that this vehicle can be some next-generation cruise missile, what is extremely fast.. Those nuclear- or conventional missiles also would have STEALTH-capacity, but the soft shape would allow them to flight very high speed. And the cruise missiles of tomorrow would be equipped with sophisticated artificial intelligence, what would allow them to change speed and course during the flight, and those missiles can also avoid enemy missiles with sophisticated computer systems, what allows them to use similar flare and chaff systems, what is used in manned aircraft. This would help the cruise missile survivability in this weapons trip to target.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora_(aircraft)


http://www.hidden-truth.org/6/black-triangle-ufo-tr-3b-astra.html


http://www.ibtimes.co.in/ufo-sighting-giant-triangular-shaped-object-spotted-hovering-over-germany-605707



Picture 1.

http://data1.ibtimes.co.in/cache-img-0-450/en/full/529973/1406724264_ufo-sighting-giant-triangular-object-spotted-hovering-over-germany.jpg


https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/


http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/lets-talk-about-ufos-part-iii-is-this.html