New types of particle accelerators revolutionize civil and military research.

"Conceptual illustration of micronozzle acceleration (MNA). A solid hydrogen rod is embedded in an aluminum micronozzle, which channels and focuses plasma flow to optimize proton acceleration. Credit: Masakatsu Murakami"(Phys.org/Tabletop particle blaster: How tiny nozzles and lasers could replace giant accelerators)

Lasers and micronozzles bring the tabletop particle accelerators closer to reality. Those systems use laser beams and magnetic fields to accelerate protons and electrons. Those systems can raise the electron’s energy level. The new system that combines liquid hydrogen and laser beams can raise the proton’s energy level to 1 GeV. That kind of ion system is much smaller than CERN particle accelerators, The new accelerator type can revolutionize civil and military technology. The ion engines or plasma ion engines that use high-energy plasma to create thrust can use that new particle accelerator type. 

The system can inject high-energy particles into gas and that system turns plasma into a high-energy level. The ion engine that can expand plasma like a regular rocket engine can form higher thrust than the regular ion engines. The plasma-ion engines combine ion and rocket engines under the new hybrid concept where high-energy plasma raises the gas temperature. There is a possibility to use antimatter injection to create high-energy plasma. The antiproton or positron injection will raise the gas's temperature and that creates thrust. 

"Concept of micronozzle acceleration (MNA). The MNA target employs a micronozzle housing a solid hydrogen rod (H-rod), precisely placed near the nozzle neck to maximize proton yield. Acting as a "power lens," the micronozzle focuses the incident laser energy onto the H-rod, enabling efficient and localized energy deposition. This configuration significantly boosts proton acceleration near the nozzle exit, outperforming setups lacking the nozzle structure. Credit: Scientific Reports (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-03385-x" (Phys.org/Tabletop particle blaster: How tiny nozzles and lasers could replace giant accelerators)

*The implications are wide-reaching:

*Energy: Supports fast ignition schemes in laser-driven nuclear fusion.

*Medicine: Enables more compact and precise systems for proton cancer therapy.

*Fundamental science: Creates conditions to simulate extreme astrophysical environments and probe matter under ultra-strong magnetic fields.

(Phys.org/Tabletop particle blaster: How tiny nozzles and lasers could replace giant accelerators)

********************************************************************

"Illustration of a spacecraft powered by nuclear propulsion and solar sails traveling towards Sedna. Image generated by AI." (RudeBaquette, “We’re Finally Fast Enough”: Nuclear Propulsion and Solar Sails Could Blast a Spacecraft to Sedna in Just 7 Years)

In that spacecraft, the solar sail can act as a reactor cooler. The futuristic system comprises a solar sail and a nuclear thermal engine that can boost the rocket into a very high speed. And the atomic engine can use pulsed plasma to create ultra-high thrust. Begin of the journey the system can use both, solar sail and a nuclear engine for maximum thrust. Then at a longer distance that solar sail can turn into a cooling system. 

These kinds of plasma systems are dangerous in the wrong hands. The ion cannon is basically the same system as the ion engine. The main problem with ion cannons is how to keep the particle beam in its form. Particles with the same polarity repel each other. There is a possibility to shoot electron beams in the ion beam. Or the target can be loaded with opposite-polarity electricity that pulls those ions to it.

But there is also the possibility of creating plasma bombs by using ion technology. Basically, a plasma bomb is only a magnetic tank where high-energy plasma hovers away from the wall. The laser, microwave, or particle accelerators can create that plasma. The particle accelerator can load high-energy plasma into the bomb by using the positron injection. When that bomb drops to the ground its shell is broken. And that releases plasma from 10- 10000 or even millions of degrees Celsius to the air. Theoretically, plasma bombs can replace thermonuclear weapons if they can create plasma that has a temperature of tens of millions of degrees Celsius. 

The antimatter bomb is the tank where antimatter hovers away from the walls. The small-sized particle accelerator that is in the airplane can load antimatter into those capsules that the system shoots at the enemy. The antimatter capsules can also be used as fuel pellets for antimatter rockets. 

https://physicsworld.com/a/micronozzle-could-give-laser-driven-particle-accelerators-a-boost/

https://phys.org/news/2025-06-tabletop-particle-blaster-tiny-nozzles.html

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/07/were-finally-fast-enough-nuclear-propulsion-and-solar-sails-could-blast-a-spacecraft-to-sedna-in-just-7-years/

The new evidence of the existence of Planet X

"An artist’s conception of Planet 9, or Planet X, which scientists theorize orbits in the distant solar system. Image credit: Robin Dienel/ Carnegie Institution of Washington" (NASA)

Planet X is never seen. That is one of the things that we should realize. Planet X is the mysterious gravitational effect at the edge of our solar system. The existence of that object is almost confirmed in one day. And some other day that strange thing doesn’t exist anymore. The thing that makes it very interesting is that the gravitational effect that makes Neptune’s trajectory wobble and the mysterious X-ray flares in Uranus are things that can cause many speculations. 

And one of them is that. There is a planet that is colder than the plasma around the sun. If the planet’s temperature is lower than the heliopause’s temperature and the planet’s trajectory is outside that point, this kind of object can be very hard to detect. The prediction is this, if Planet X really exists it would be geologically dead. It could be the rogue planet that our sun or the outer planets Neptune and Uranus are trapped near the edge of the solar system. It’s possible that this mysterious gravitational object has gone out from the solar system’s gravitational pool. And turned into a rogue planet. 

Uranus’s X-ray flares. 

Dwarf planet Haumea with Rings and its two moons Hiʻiaka (Haumea 1) and Namaka (Haumea 2). 

Artist impression of Quaoar rings. Credit: Paris Observatory

Artist's impression of Quaoar with its ring and its moon Weywot

The primordial black hole hypothesis. 

But there is also the possibility that Planet X is something like a black hole. In some scenarios, a very small black hole can pull a shell around it. In some models, the small black hole can exist in asteroid-size objects. Or even on some planets. The small black hole must only pull dust or ice around it symmetrically. If those particles are locked around that black hole they can form a structure that looks like a regular planet. So could some of the dwarf planets in the Kuiper belt be that mysterious Planet X? 

There is one object that can be interesting about the researchers. That object is the dwarf planet Quaoar. The thing that makes that dwarf planet very interesting is its ring system. That dwarf planet should have a very weak gravity. Sometimes astronomers and I thought that some kind of plasma whirling around that small dwarf planet makes the Van Allen-belt type magnetic phenomenon that can trap the low-energy plasma that comes from the sun. Another remarkable thing is that Quaoar has a moon called Weywot. And if that artist’s impression is right, that means that this moon is quite a long distance from Quaoar. 

The third interesting thing is that the Quaoar’s temperature is 41 K which is -231.3C. There is suspicion that some kind of radioactive process warms the Quaoar. But the primordial black hole can explain that temperature. 

But there is one very wild idea. Could Quaoar be the primordial black hole that formed the ice shell around it? Maybe that thing seems very rare, or radical theory. But if the planet X is some kind of primordial black hole, can that thing be some dwarf planet that we already know? That primordial black hole can seem very innocent if it's in some dwarf planet. And then we can look at another dwarf planet: Haumea. An interesting thing is that Haumea has two moons. 

When we look at images of Haumea we see that the little world with two moons is stretched. Haumea itself looks like an egg. That thing can happen because of the fast spin. Or it can happen because some force from that thing stretches the Haumea. Those two moons should destroy Haumea’s ring system. The names of those moons are Hiʻiaka (Haumea 1) and Namaka (Haumea 2)

The primordial black hole that is in the stable trajectory and pulls particle shells around it can be very hard to separate from the real dwarf planets. If there are no objects near that thing, we cannot measure the object’s mass using those things. If that black hole pulls all dust from around it. That thing prevents astronomers from seeing dust clouds from around it. 

https://astrobites.org/2025/04/28/vulcan-pbh/

https://www.astronomy.com/science/is-planet-nine-a-black-hole-or-a-planet-harvard-scientists-suggest-a-way-to-find-out/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/49910160

https://www.buffalo.edu/news/releases/2024/12/primordial-black-holes-may-be-hiding-in-planets-or-even-everyday-objects-here-on-Earth.html

https://chandra.harvard.edu/blog/node/786

https://nasaspacenews.com/2025/04/black-holes-from-the-big-bang-could-be-trapped-inside-our-planet/

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/07/were-seeing-something-massive-out-there-astronomers-detect-possible-ninth-planet-beyond-neptune-in-chilling-new-discovery/

https://scitechdaily.com/dark-matters-secret-hideouts-are-primordial-black-holes-lurking-nearby/

https://www.space.com/primordial-black-holes-cat-big-bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haumea

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hi%CA%BBiaka_(moon)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namaka_(moon)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaoar

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weywot

The major problem with fusion experiments is, how to make plasma stay in its form.

The problem with fusion reaction is that the high-energy plasma will not keep its form. So when the energy pump to fusion ends the energy that comes inside will break the plasma. So what if the opposite polar particles will shoot at that plasma ball? 

That thing makes it possible that the fusion reaction begins from the plasma ball's core. The shockwave would travel inside that plasma ball. In regular cases, fusion starts from the middle of the fusion material. And that shockwave destroys the plasma ball. 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

The "cannon device" ion-anion collider where opposite polar particles will shoot against each other could be suitable for some kind of fusion system. 

In some cases, researchers introduced to use of some kind of "cannon device" for solving problems of the fusion reactor. This kind of cannon device is quite a simple system. 

Two linear particle accelerators are shooting opposite polar particles against each other. That thing will collide with anions and ions together. And that kind of system is easier to create than Tokamak-type reactors. 

The system could use lithium ions and chloride anions. But the problem is that the system must create enough energy for a self-sustaining fusion reaction. Otherwise, an ion-anion collider would be suitable for the fusion system. 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

So, when the electromagnetic radiation starts to grow temperature of the plasma causes a situation where the plasma particles start to repel each other. When the fusion ignition happens the energy that fusion forms break the plasma structure. 

In the case where fusion ignites the fusion material makes flash. It sends electromagnetic radiation around it. And that causes the electromagnetic vacuum, which pulls particles away from the plasma ball. In that case, electromagnetic overpressure breaks the structure. 

The plasma that is used in fusion experiments is monopolar. This means the electromagnetic force will push those particles away from each other. And the magnetic field that has the same polarity must push that plasma in one entirety. When the fusion ignites the energy level of the magnetic field that presses the particles must be higher than plasma. That helps to keep plasma in its form. 

The problem is that the fusion starts in the middle of the plasma.  where it starts the shockwave through that material. If the fusion can begin in the core of the plasma ball the impact wave would travel inside it. 

So the answer to the problems of the fusion could be that the opposite polar particles would shoot at that plasma ball. That can begin the fusion reaction at the core of the plasma ball. 

In that case, the magnets should press that plasma harder than the energy that forms in fusion pushes particles. If that thing is done there is the possibility to create a self-sustaining fusion reaction. 

Image and sources: 

https://scitechdaily.com/mit-contributes-to-success-of-historic-fusion-ignition-experiment/

Which one was a first egg or chicken?

Helix Nebula in visible light. 

Two forces affect the planetary nebula. Those forces are electromagnetic forces of the giant plasma cloud. The shine of those particles is electromagnetic radiation that pushes particles away from each other. The electromagnetic interaction affects two directions. It can push, and it can pull objects. 

Another force is gravitation. That pulls particles together. The symmetry of those forces. Or repelling and pulling effects determines if there is a possibility that some kind of stars or planet form in those nebulas. 

The electromagnetic force between ions or monopolar particles that have the same polarity pushes those particles away from each other. the electromagnetic force between anions and ions is pulling particles together along with gravitation. 

When we look at the Helix nebula above this text, we see the shine. Image one is taken by using visible light. And the second one is in the infrared wavelength. That is the emission radiation of ions and anions. The supernova remnant in the middle of the nebula adjusts the atoms to a higher energy level. The shine comes from atoms that are adjusted from a higher energy level. That shine causes the repel of those ions if they are all ions. The electromagnetic emission radiation pushes particles away from each other and denies the form of stars. So there must form some center in the nebula, before the formation of stars begins. 

The center can be electromagnetic. In that case, the anion can slip into the ion plasma. And start to grow material around it. Or some other thing causes the disturbance that starts the formation of stars. That center must have so powerful pulling force, that it will win the electromagnetic repelling force of the particles. That have the same polarity. 

Helix Nebula in the infrared image. 

We all know the question: "Which one was a first egg or chicken?". When we are talking about rogue planets that are wandering around the galaxy, we can ask "which one was first, star or planet?"

When a rogue planet wanders into a galaxy. And when it faces the planetary nebulas that planet is creating a disturbance when it pulls that material to it. The movement trajectory of that material is similar to neutron stars or black holes. But the effect is weaker. 

That thing causes the whirls and impacts in that nebula. And impacted particles are forming the gravitational centers. 

Those gravitational centers are making the material pile up at those points. So the gravitational effect of exoplanets is making it possible that the stars and planetary systems to start forming. 

Mainly the term "Planetary nebula" means nebulas where lots of heavy elements. or their origin in exploded stars. Every heavier-than-hydrogen element in the universe formed in the fusion reaction in the stars. Without those elements, forming of planets is not possible. 

https://scitechdaily.com/rogue-planets-captured-by-stars/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planetary_nebula

https://astronomyandtechnology.blogspot.com/

Electric-jet engines or plasma-jet thrusters can connect with solar energy.

Image 1)

The plasma-ion thrusters and plasma-jet engines can have virtually unlimited operational time. The problem with electric jet engines is that they must have electricity from somewhere. 

There are two ways to make virtually unlimited operational time for aircraft. The first one is to use nuclear power. 

And that kind of system is otherwise easy to make. But nuclear power technology is an extremely dangerous thing. A damaged nuclear reactor can deliver highly radioactive containment to a very large area. If that craft will drop. It can cause nuclear pollution in large areas. 

There is the possibility to make solar-powered aircraft that use plasma jets or plasma ion thrusters. The idea is that the aircraft. Much like a U-2 spy plane would fly at high stratospheric attitudes. In those altitudes, long wings are necessary. 

Lockheed U-2 "Dragon lady" (Redditt)

Those wings can be coverer by using solar panels. The thin air makes low friction. And it makes it possible that this system can fly at quite a fast speed. But solar-powered aircraft can also be hypersonic. Energy production can boost by using windmill turbo generators. 

But another way is to make hypersonic aircraft that use plasma thrusters or plasma jet engines. The system bases the ability to make origami-type lightweight solar panels that can be pulled inside when the craft is not using them. The hypersonic aircraft can jump away from the atmosphere, open its solar panels. When the batteries are loaded that craft can drop back into the atmosphere. 

While traveling in the atmosphere, the aircraft can use a windmill turbogenerator. For slowing the emptying of batteries. 

The fact is that the solar-windmill generator combination can use along with remote loading systems. The remote loading system can shoot the aircraft by using radio rays.  '

For loading the electric systems in the night time. The thing is that imagination is the limit in futuristic concepts. Energy production with green systems is a very interesting thing because there is always a risk of accidents. 

https://geekerhertz.com/article/uncovering-chinas-new-electric-plasma-jet-engine

https://interestingengineering.com/new-electric-jet-engine-actually-works-inside-the-atmosphere

https://www.theengineer.co.uk/plasma-jet-microwave-wuhan/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulsed_plasma_thruster

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_U-2

Image 1) https://geekerhertz.com/article/uncovering-chinas-new-electric-plasma-jet-engine

https://likeinterstellartravelingandfuturism.blogspot.com/

The fusion energy is coming.

Fusion energy is one of the most interesting versions of energy production. The problem is that this reactor requires deuterium and tritium for the fusion. The term "heavy water" means that the hydrogen is turned to its heavier isotopes deuterium and tritium. But there is so small number of those isotopes in the water. 

In hydrogen bombs, lithium deuteride creates, deuterium and tritium when it's shot with neutrons. But deuterium and tritium can produce from water by stressing it with radiation. In nature, 0,015% of hydrogen is in deuterium form. 

So vaporized lithium deuteride can use in fusion reactors the same way. The radiation stress would turn lithium 6 deuteride into deuterium and tritium. The vacuum allows vaporizing the lithium deuteride. And then that vaporized lithium deuteride can be driven to a tokamak-type donut-shaped reactor. 

When a fusion reaction is started. The reactor's radiation can use to produce deuterium and tritium. The bottle of water will take near the fusion reactor. And then the radiation of that reactor should turn the hydrogen in that water to deuterium and tritium. In laboratories, deuterium and tritium are formed by stressing water by using X-ray machines.

In the universe, the deuterium is forming in the nuclear fusion of stars.  But there is no chemical reaction that can form the deuterium or tritium. There is the possibility to create tritium by using neutron radiation. In that case, the neutron flow would impact deuterium. And the deuterium traps neutron and turns to tritium. 

In the production of those heavier isotopes of hydrogen, the neutron or two neutrons in the case of tritium must connect to the proton. Producing tritium by using Helium 3 is impossible because there are two protons and one neutron in Helium 3. The tritium involves two neutrons and one proton. 

But in nature heavy water is forming when cosmic radiation hits the water. In that reaction, the hydrogen turns to deuterium and tritium. This reaction is extremely slow. But when we are thinking possibility to take the water tanks to the edge of the atmosphere. There is the possibility to stress the water by using cosmic radiation.

Researchers can make it by using balloons or high-flying aircraft. The high-flying stratospheric aircraft can take water bottles to the upper atmosphere. 

There is the possibility to use the fission reactor to create deuterium and tritium. In that case, the water bottle will be put in the nuclear reactor. And then the neutron radiation can turn the water into heavy water. So the nuclear reactor will turn the hydrogen atoms in water be deuterium and tritium. But the most economical version is to benefit the fusion reactor's radiation for making those hydrogen isotopes. 

https://quillette.com/2022/02/21/fusion-power-is-coming/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deuterium

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium-3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium_hydride

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermonuclear_weapon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritium

For the first time probe has touched the Sun.

 

 For the first time probe has touched the Sun. 

NASA Parker probe has been dive in the Sun. That probe used interesting technology that helped to keep it cool. There could be possible to make the probe dive even deeper by using a magnetic field that pushes the plasma away from the probe. That would decrease the interaction between the probe and the plasma that comes from the Sun. 

The reason why Parker was sent to its mission. Is that it should collect data from the solar wind. The solar wind is high-energetic plasma that can destroy spacecraft. But there is another reason why close contact with the Sun is needed. The mission of probes like Parker is to collect data for the fusion tests. The power source of the Sun is fusion reaction. And the close contact with the Sun is the thing that can help to model the conditions that are making fusion possible. 

In some visions, the probes like Parker can collect antimatter from the solar atmosphere. The probe would travel to the sun.  Then that antimatter collector dives deep into the corona. Then it could open the solar sail and solar wind can push the probe back to Earth. 

Antimatter production is extremely expensive. And the probe could create it by putting the beta particles of the solar wind impact with gold leaf. Antimatter can use in fusion reactors to start the fusion reaction. 

The antimatter is creating an extremely high energy load. And that energy can use for starting and maintaining fusion reactions. The antimatter can make annihilate with material around the plasma-ring at Tokamak-type reactors. And that energy dose can start a fusion reaction. And it can raise the temperature after certain periods. The use of antimatter is to boost the fusion reaction in the fusion reactors. 

When the fusion reactor will start to turn too cold small dose of antimatter can turn the temperature to the needed level. The problem with the fusion rector is that the needed temperature is higher than in the Sun's nucleus. In the fusion reactors, the pressure of the nucleus of the sun must compensate by rising temperature to so high level. That the heat replaces missing pressure.  

The use of antimatter is one of the answers to how to create enough energy for starting self-maintaining fusion. But the high price would limit the use of antimatter for that purpose. So antimatter can collect from space. 

https://scitechdaily.com/parker-solar-probe-for-the-first-time-in-history-a-spacecraft-has-touched-the-sun/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak

https://likeinterstellartravelingandfuturism.blogspot.com/

The X-ray emission of Uranus

 The X-ray emission of Uranus

The Chandra satellite has found the X-ray emission from the auroras of Uranus. Mainly those X-ray flares are the result of the high-energetic plasma that hits the upper atmosphere of Uranus. The reason why the particles would get enough high speed.  

And energy level for creating X-rays when they impact the atmosphere of the Uranus is that the magnetic poles of that planet are turned to the sun. The magnetic poles are accelerating the particles that have opposite polarity. 

This thing explains the X-ray emission of the poles of the planet than the X-ray emission of the atmosphere of that planet's equator. That is turning away from the Sun.

 As we all remember, Uranus is laying planet. The reason for that emission is the high-energetic particle rain that causes the X-ray flashes at the upper atmosphere of that planet. The X-ray emission is the thing that uncovers the black holes. But there is something that causes a similar thing in Uranus. Sometimes the rings of that planet are mentioned as the reason for that X-ray radiation. 

The theory goes like this:  small metal atom sticks are turning to the planet. And they would conduct the electrons to the atmosphere of Uranus. That means the small metal bites in the rings are turning the plasma flow from the sun to the electron flow that hits Uranus causing the X-ray radiation. 

But there is another version of that theory. The idea is that Planet 9 is the grapefruit-size black hole and that thing will send the electron shower to Uranus. The fact is that the mystery of those X-ray flares is causing many types of predictions about what can be found in the outer solar system. But mainly those X-rays are coming from the particles of the sun. 

Source:

https://www.livescience.com/planet-nine-little-black-hole.html

https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/images/first-x-rays-from-uranus-discovered.html

The fictional part of the text begins here:

Nikola Tesla made an idea to turn the Earth into a generator. The idea of Tesla was to cover the entire Earth by using a metal net. That would collect energy from the magnetic field of Earth. 

And finally, one futuristic idea which source was the Uranus rings. 

There is an idea that maybe in the future the Earth is surrounding the artificial energy ring. That giant solar panel will deliver energy to the earth in the form of radio waves. That kind of system can deliver energy to the planet that is near its sun. 

But also the distant planets can use energy rings. The idea is that the energy rings are forming of the thin wires, and there are billions of nanotechnical dynamos between those cables. 

The cable rings can orbit around the planet at different speeds. And those dynamos deliver electricity to planet or space station. The simpler version is to make the giant ring below the wheel-looking ring and then that thing can use to turn the entire planet into a power station. The lower ring would be the stator and the outer ring would be the rotor in that giant generator. 

There is also a vision that the giant space station would surround by using the rotating ring. The ring acts as a rotor and the space station would act as the stator. And that thing can turn the giant space station into a power station that delivers energy to clients by using maser-rays. But those things are visions. 

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

Is there similar wave-particle duality in dark energy-dark matter combination with particles and energy in visible material has? 

Is dark energy so stable radiation that we cannot see any changes in that power field? Or is dark energy probably the universe-size power or plasma field. In that case, we cannot see that plasma field because we are inside it. The situation is similar to the case where we are inside the balloon. We cannot see the balloon outside. And we can see only the pressure inside the balloon. We might think there is space outside the balloon. But we cannot be sure about that thing. 

The reason why I believe that dark energy is the universe-size plasma-or electromagnetic field. Is that our sun (and all other stars) are surrounded by halos. Those halos are the plasma balls. That is positioning the particles or objects that are at the impact point of the interstellar plasma. And the plasma that comes out from the star. 

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

Have you seen the asteroids around the sun in the Kuiper belt form a similar form as the galaxies are forming in the universe? The size of the universe is much much bigger but the forms around the center point are similar. 

Galaxies are in the same position in the universe as asteroids are positioned in the plasma ball of the stars. The structures of the universe are similar to the structures of the Kuiper belt are both balls. The Kuiper belt is the ball-shaped asteroid structure that orbits the sun and other stars. The same way the galaxies are forming the ball-shaped structure around the universe. 

If we are inside that enormous plasma field we cannot separate it from the environment outside that power field. If we want to make observations of the power field we must stand outside it. If we are inside it we cannot see it. Because we cannot separate the edge of the power field if we are standing in it. 

The mystery of dark energy can be solving. There is the possibility that we cannot detect dark energy, because it's too stable radiation. If the form of dark energy is similar to "cosmic hum". The reason why we haven't seen that energy before is that the dark energy is so stable. 

We cannot see the changes in the energy fields where that radiation affects. If the radiation is very stable, we cannot see the changes in the energy levels of that radiation. In that case, the dark energy would compare with the situation. The voltage meter faces the ultra-stable electric circuit. 

If there is no information about the electricity and the meter is staying stable. The person who uses that meter would go home and recalibrate that measurement tool. Normally the observations about the power fields are made by following the changes in the levels of the power field. But if the power field is enormous and homogenous. It's hard to detect. 

So is dark energy the power field that fills the entire universe? In that case, we cannot see it. We would be inside the universe size power field and the only way to separate it from the environment would be going out from the universe.

Maybe XENON 1T experiment has detected dark energy.

If the wave-particle duality can expand to dark energy. That means dark energy is the form of dark matter. 

The first time there is an interaction between material and dark energy. And that thing is one of the most fascinating moments in the history of natural sciences. Dark energy is the interactive wave movement as well as the normal energy is. 

So if we want to expand the wave-particle duality to dark energy we can say that dark energy is the same way form of the dark material as normal energy or wave movement is in the regular material. In this text, the term regular material means material that is visible to us. 

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

Image()https://scitechdaily.com/xenon1t-experiment-may-have-detected-dark-energy/

Is dark energy simple the radio radiation that we cannot see? And is the reason that the radiation is very stable? 

If dark matter also has the wave-particle duality. That can mean dark energy and dark matter has the form of dark energy. That means dark matter in the form of dark energy. But is the answer for the dark energy is that it's the radio waves that we cannot see. The reason for that could be that those radio waves cannot pass the galactic or stellar halos. Those halos are the plasma balls around stars and galaxies. 

Many theories are trying to explain what causes wave movement that is invisible to us. The new observations of the comic hum that the Voyager probe detected when it travels outside our solar system are causing new ideas of dark energy. The cosmic hum is the radio waves that are not passing the plasma ball of the sun. 

That means there is no way to observe that radiofrequency from Earth. The telescope must travel outside of the solar system for making observations of the cosmic hum. So if we are thinking logically, there must be radio waves that are not passing the plasma halo of the galaxy. 

And maybe that is the thing. That would explain why there is energy that cannot detect from Earth. Or we cannot detect that energy straight. But we can detect the changes in the energy level of the plasma ball of the sun when radiowaves are hitting it. But the problem is that the cosmic hum is so stable, that we cannot see the changes in the plasma ball of the sun. That requires changes in the radiation that hits the plasma. 

Another thing that we might forget is that material can be heavier than we expected. When there are supernovas and other high-energetic reactions in the universe, that reaction sends energy waves around the universe. When radiation hits the particles it will load the energy to that particle. And then the energy is rising the mass of the particles. 

The difference between particles in the universe and the particle on the Earth is that the particle that hovers in the universe cannot release its energy other ways than just shining it as the electromagnetic wave movement. This is why the nebulas in the space are shining. 

The energy pumping to that material is not stable. The pikes in the energy pump can happen when the supernovas are exploding or black holes are colliding. That thing increases the energy level and the mass of the material. 

()https://www.cosmic.news/2021-05-23-voyager-1-discovers-mysterious-hum-outside-solar-system.html

()https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

The writing about labyrinths and virtual computers

Picture I

https://sites.google.com/view/labyrinthsandcomputers/etusivu

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The similarity between a labyrinths and microchips structure is well known, and there are people, who believe that ancient people would use the labyrinths as the programming of human beings. That can also be the hoax or misunderstanding the purpose of labyrinths. The reason why labyrinths are made in some gardens can cause that they could be used in the training of the thinking of children. The labyrinths were excellent tools to improve persons ability to use own brains and the innovative attitude in the labyrinth would increase persons ability to focus the room, space, and directions.


But there would be some very interesting applications, what bases on labyrinths. The similarity of labyrinths and microchips is created the brand new idea to make computers. This idea is not maybe new, but I remember, that I saw it in some movie or article. The idea is to make a so-called ion computer. In this kind of system would be no cables and wires inside the microprocessors. The system bases the idea, that ionized gas would be used as wires in the gigantic microprocessor. This kind of processors is still science fiction.


But the ionized gas or laser rays can be used to create the computer, what is the size of the entire universe. This kind of computer can seem theory, but there are theories about the very large computers, what are purely virtualized. The wires of that hypothetical computers are replaced with laser- or ionic rays, and that thing could be the very interesting thing. And when we are starting to think the virtualization of the computers and microchips, we could start to think about super virtualization of the microchip.


The idea would seem like crazy, but maybe we could make computer simulation, what could act like real ion or plasma computer. In that case, the computer would make virtual reality, what would simulate perfectly the real world microchips. But could that virtual microchip really replace the physical microchip would be the actual question of the distant future? This is only the theory, and the question is, that could human being make so perfect simulation, that it could work as the real microprocessor? This would be seen somewhere in the future.

Picture I

http://monumentshistoriques.free.fr/cathedrales/stomer/interieur/labyrinthe.jpg

The writing of strike to Syria again

travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/17/the-writing-of-strike-to-syria-again/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/17/the-writing-of-strike-to-syria-again/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/17/the-writing-of-strike-to-syria-again/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/17/the-writing-of-strike-to-syria-again/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/17/the-writing-of-strike-to-syria-again/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/17/the-writing-of-strike-to-syria-again/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/17/the-writing-of-strike-to-syria-again/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/17/the-writing-of-strike-to-syria-again/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/17/the-writing-of-strike-to-syria-again/

Elektromagneettiset aseet ovat alustasta vapaita sekä tehokkaita jokaista ajateltavissa olevaa kohdetta vastaan

LaWS (Laser Weapon System)

“The Philadelphia experiment" on legendaarinen koe, missä laivan runko varattiin sähköllä, mikä tuotettiin sen generaattoreissa. Kokeen tarkoitus oli saada laiva varautumaan sähköllä siten, että se alkaisi imeä radioaaltoja itseensä, ja jos oikein hyvin kävisi, olisi tuo alus näkymätön tutkalle. Toissijainen tavoite olisi ilmeisesti ollut luoda eräänlainen uiva versio Serbialaisen keksijän Nikola Teslan legendaarisesta “Vanderbiltin kokeesta”, missä generaattoria pyöritettiin valtavan korkean puutornin päässä, kun Tesla testasi mahdollisuutta siirtää sähköä ilman kautta. Tuossa “The Philadelphia experiment”- kokeessa sitten kävi niin, että alukseen syntyi valokaari, joka aiheutti henkilövahinkoja.

Tuon kokeen muista tuloksista ei olla kerrottu tarkasti, mutta itse uskoisin että laivasta lähtevät EMP-pulssit saattoivat aiheuttaa vaurioita myös ympäristölle. Jos tuollaisen sähkövaraukseen perustuvan STEALTH-tekniikan halutaan toimivan oikeasti, niin varauksen millä aluksen runko varataan pitää olla melko pieni, näet jos aluksen rungon varaamiseen käytetään liian kovaa virtaa, niin silloin tuo laiva tai muu kappale alkaa lähettää radioaaltoja ilmassa. Koska tuossa kokeessa ilmeisesti käytettiin aluksen omia dynamoja eli generaattoreita täydellä teholla, niin silloin sen mastojen väliin syntyy maailman suurimmat “elmon tulet”, mikä saattaa aiheuttaa esimerkiksi palovammoja.

Jos tuo koe olisi onnistunut, niin silloin käytössä olisi STEALTH-tekniikka, joka olisi toiminut jokaisessa maailman laivassa, eikä mihinkään alukseen olisi tarvinnut tehdä muutoksia. Mikäli tuossa kokeessa olisi toistunut sama tilanne, mikä Teslan “Vanderbiltin” kokeessa oli toistunut, niin tuon hävittäjä-aluksen ympärille olisi muodostunut laajeneva plasmavyöhyke, joka olisi sitten saattanut aiheuttaa vaurioita koko Philadelphian sataman alueella olevalle elektroniikalle, ja tuollainen laite varmasti kiinnosti laivastoa sekä koko asevoimien johtoa.

Plasma on tietokoneille sekä muulle elektroniikalle hyvin tuhoisa aineen olomuoto, koska se indusoi sähkökentän kaikkiin kappaleisiin. “Vanderbiltin” kokeessa missä generaattoria ikään kuin pyöritetään tyhjää voidaan teoriassa muodostaa niin paljon ionisoitua kaasua, että se paittää koko maapallon.  Tuo sähkökenttä sitten aiheuttaa esimerkiksi moottorien sammumisen sekä elektroniikan tuhoutumisen, ja sen etuna lasereihin nähden on se, että plasmaa voidaan ohjata magneettikentällä.

Joten nykyisen teknologian käytöllä tuota plasmaa voidaan ohjata vihollisen päälle hyvin tehokkaasti. Tarvitaan vain joukko nanohelikopteita, jotka on varustettu ohjausmagneeteilla, ja sitten ne vain muodostavat “kunniakujan”, jonka kautta ionosoitua kaasua sitten ohjataan vihollisen päälle. Eli mikään kovin vaaraton väline tällainen laite ei koskaan olisi. Kun puhutaan siitä, että tuon kokeen yhteydessä olisi nähty esimerkiksi UFO:ja, niin se saattaa olla kuitenkin vain keksittyjä asioita, joilla pyrittiin sitten peittämään “the Philadelphia experiment”-ohjelman  todellinen tarkoitus.

Tai sitten tuosta aluksesta lähtevä sähkömagneettinen kenttä muotoili jostain pilvistä hiukan erikoisen näköisiä. Kun tuota koetta ajatellaan, niin uskoisin että tuolloin tarkoitus oli myös ehkä kehittää radio- tai mikroaaltoon perustuvia aseita, joilla USA:n laivasto olisi voinut tuhota esimerkiksi U-veneitä hyvin nopeasti sekä tehokkaasti. Tehokkain mahdollisuus olisi lähettää siihen kohtaan missä U-vene paikannetaan kaksi äärimmäisen tehokasta samanaikaista radiosignaalia, jotka aiheuttavat erittäin voimakkaan valokaaren veden olevan sukellusveneen kohdalla.

Kun taas puhutaan esimerkiksi mikroaaltoaseesta, niin se ei välttämättä ole sen kummemman näköinen kuin tavallinen tykki, eli tykin putken ympärille asetetaan käämitys, ja sen taakse laitetaan sitten magnetroni. Tuollaisen maser-tykin läpi voidaan tietenkin ampua myös normaaleja kranaatteja. Toki tuollainen sähkömagneettinen ase voidaan sijoittaa mihin tahansa laivaan. EMP-pulssi nimittäin on vain aivan normaali ylitehokas radioaalto, joka sitten aiheuttaa sähköisen induktion mihin tahansa johtimeen. Tuollainen EMP-ase voisi siis olla hyvin voimakkaita radioaaltoja käyttävä tutka, joka asennetaan johonkin kauppa-alukseen tai troolariin. Tuo ase voisi olla sellainen, että siinä olisi normaaliin tutkaan kiinnitetyt sykäyskondensaattorit eli “leyden pullot”, jotka ensin varataan tuon aluksen sähköjärjestelmän kautta.

Noiden kondensaattorien lataaminen jatkuu sitten, kunnes “leyden pullojen” varaus on tarpeeksi kova, niin silloin niiden antama sähkövirta johdetaan aluksen tutkaan tai radioantenniin, jolloin tuosta laitteesta lähtee valtavan voimakas radioaalto, joka saattaa kaikki RPV:t tai muun elektroniikan toimintakyvyttömäksi. Tuollainen laite voisi oikeasti olla kauko-ohjattava, eli se laukaistaan sitten etäkäytön avulla, jolloin aluksen miehistön ei siitä tarvitse mitään tietää. Jos oikein lähdetään pohtimaan sitä, millaisia “James Bond”-välineitä voidaan laivaan asentaa, niin tietenkin niiden mastoon voidaan kiinnittää laser, jonka sädettä ohjataan niiden päässä olevan peilin avulla.

Ja kun vastustaja tulee liian lähelle, niin tuollainen laser voi sitten leikata sen pohjan irti. Saman tietenkin tekee esimerkiksi aluksen SONAR:in viereen asennettu mikroaaltolaite, ja tässä sitte mieleeni tulee sellainen uusi “Dahir insaat”-filmi, missä tuollainen troolari sitten asettuu viattomasti johonkin satamaan, ja sitten sen edessä olevan laivan rungon ympärillä alkaakin kuplia, jonka jälkeen alus alkaa vajota.

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/

"Foo-hävittäjät" ja muita outoja valoja taivaalla sekä merellä

“Foo-hävittäjä” on eräänlainen valoilmiö, joka ikään kuin seuraa lentokonetta sen lentäessä pimeällä. Havaintojen mukaan kyseessä on pienikokoinen plasmapallo tai jonkinlainen valokaari, joka pyörii lentokoneen ympärillä. Sitä pidetään joissakin piireissä meteorologisena tai fysikaalisena ilmiönä, jossa lentokone ensin varautuu staattisella sähköllä, ja sitten se peittyy plasmakerroksella. Tuo ilmiö saisi sitten aikaan sen, että salamoiden tuhansien asteiden läpötilaan kuumentama vesipisara, joka on muuttunut plasmapalloksi alkaa ikään kuin seurata tuota lentokonetta.

Kyseinen ilmiö on sikäli erikoinen, että siitä on melko paljon kuvia, ja tätä epäillään sähköiseksi häiriöksi, koska tuon ilmiön aikana eivät lentokoneiden viestijärjestelmät toimi kunnolla. Toisin sanoen kyseessä olisi ilmailuun liittyvä “elmon tuli”-ilmiö, jollainen tavataan joskus laivoilla. “Elmon tuleksi” kutsutaan siis laivan mastojen väliin ilmestyvää valokaarta, joka hohtaa erittäin kirkkaana, ja koska ukonilmalla laiva varautuu sähköllä, niin esimerkiksi “lentävää hollantilaista” pidetään yksinkertaisesti sähköisen ilmiön aikaansaamana hohteena laivojen rungossa, jolloin kyseessä ei sitten ole mikään kovin yliluonnollinen ilmiö.

Kuitenkin Toisen maailmansodan aikana “Foo-hävittäjiä” alettiin tutkia tarkemmin, koska tuolloin ilma-ase alkoi olla yksi sodan ratkaisijoista. Tuolloin myös vihollisen teknistä osaamista hiukan liioiteltiin, ja siksi näihin ilmiöihin alkoi tulla kaiken maailman mystiikkaa. Liittoutuneiden piireissä alkoi kiertää huhuja siitä, että Saksalla olisi ollut käytössään valtava “Zeppelin-ilmalaiva”, joka olisi kyennyt vetämään B-17 pommikoneen sisäänsä, ja kaappaamaan sen miehistön.

Tuolloin huhut liikkuivat noiden pommikoneiden miehistöjen parissa, että nämä “valopallot” olisivat muistuttaneet taskulamppuja, ja että koneiden ulkopuolella olisi ollut miehiä. 1940- ja 50-luvuilla alkoi ilmailu tulla kaikille tutuksi, joten tuo legenda jättimäisestä “Zeppelinistä” alkoi muuttaa muotoaan, ja “Kylmän sodan versio” tästä laitteesta on tarina siitä, että Neuvostoliitolla tai Venäjällä on käytössään valtava “Backfire”-pommittaja, joka pystyy ottamaan lentokoneen jonkinlaiseen kammioon.

Tämän legendan takana on muuten sellainen ilmalaiva tyyppi, jota kutsutaan lentäväksi lentotukialukseksi. Näitä illaivoja, joiden nimet olivat “USS Akron” sekä “USS Macon”, joka kykeni huoltamaan hävittäjäkoneita, ja tuota “Maconia” pidetään maailman ensimmäisenä lentävänä lentotukialuksena, ja se itse on innoittanut monia tieteistarinoita. Ne oli varustettu viidellä Curtiss F9F “Sparrowhawk”-hävittäjällä, ja kuten varmaan arvaatte, niin noiden ilmalaivojen kohtaloksi koitui se, että niiden tullessa käyttöön ei tekniikka ollut aivan sitä, mitä sen olisi pitänyt olla, jotta projekti saataisiin viedyksi kunnialla läpi, joten nuo ilmalaivat sitten tuhoutuivat tuulenpuuskan takia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Macon_(ZRS-5)

Mutta monet ihmiset eivät tiedä, että muissakin ilmalaivoissa oli lentokoneita, joiden tehtävänä oli viedä viesti ilmalaivan saapumisesta maihin. Ja esimerkiksi “Hindenburgissa” oli yksi Heinkel -kaksitaso tätä tehtävää varten, joten liittoutuneet pelkäsivät tätä välinettä osittain aiheesta. Kun tässä puhutaan seuraavaksi Saksan aseista, niin tietenkin vastaavia huhuja kulki myös akselivaltojen puolella. Kun puhutaan iskusta New Yorkiin, niin silloin 1940-luvulla ajateltiin, että joku ilmalaiva olisi vienyt “Ju-87 Stuka” syöksypommittajia allaan lähelle esimerkiksi jotain USA:n telakkaa, ja sitten nuo koneet olisivat tehneet iskun tuohon kohteeseen. Ideana olisi ollut se, että tuollaisen korkealla lentävän ilmalaivan alle olisi ripustettu syöksypommittajia, ja kun alus olisi tullut iskuetäisyydelle kohteestaan, niin miehistö olisi siirtynyt noihin koneisiin, ja suorittanut tehtävänsä.

Tuossa “Zeppelinissä” olisi ollut remmiahtimella varustetut dieselit, sekä paineistettu gondoli, joka olisi suojannut noita miehistöjä tehtävän ajan. Pommit olisi voitu ripustaa Stukiin jo valmiiksi maassa, ja sitten koneet olisi vain pudotettu operaatioon. Nuo syöksypommittajat olisi voitu varustaa ilokaasulaitteistolla, joka olisi sitten antanut niille hyvin suuren lentokorkeuden, ja tietenkin miehistöjen palauttaminen olisi ollut mahdollista joko niin, että syöksypommittajat olisivat lentäneet ilmalaivassa oleviin koukkuihin, jonka jälkeen miehistö olisi siirtynyt takaisin kuljetusvälineenä toimivaan ilmalaivaan.

Tai sitten he olisivat voineet hypätä Stukista mereen, josta U-veneet olisivat noutaneet heidät takaisin. Samanlaisia suunnitelmia epäiltiin Neuvostoliitolla olevan USA:n suhteen, ja tietenkin myös länsimailla ajateltiin olevan vastaavia välineitä. Ja joissakin tarinoissa tuo ilmalaiva olisi ollut amerikkalainen, ja koneena olisi “Helldriver” sekä kohteena joku tarkoin valittu kohde Saksassa tai Japanissa. Kuten tiedämme, niin legendat elävät edelleen, ja aina välillä tuollaisia “Foo-Hävittäjiä” nähdään ilmassa. Uusin versio noista koneista on sellainen, että lentokoneeseen kiinnittyy kolme kauko-ohjattavaa “dronea”, jotka on varustettu superliimaan perustuvalla kiinnittimellä, joiden avulla ne sieppaavat kohteen hallintaan.

Kyseinen liima on sellaista, että se kuivuu myös tyhjiössä, ja nuo “dronet” olisivat oikeastaan maalilennokkien muunnoksia. Tarinoiden mukaan niiden toiminta olisi sellaista, että ne laukaisevat lentokoneeseen erittäin voimakkaan sähköiskun, joka saa sen elektroniikan pettämään, ja sitten ne vain peittävät kohteidensa turbiinien ilmanotot, jolloin moottorit saadaan sammumaan, ja sitten vain yksi noista koneista asettuu “uhrin”päälle tai sen alapuolelle,  ja muut ottavat siivistä kiinni, ja vievät sen “pikku lennolle”.

Niissä tietenkin pitää olla kääntyvät suihkuputket, jotta ne voivat ohjata tuota “uhriaan”. Eli nuo koneet toimivat “remoran” eli laivakalan tapaan, ja tämä telakoituminen sitten saisi aikaan sen, että ohjaimet tuntuvat jäykiltä. Ja ehkä tuollaisia koneita olisi joillakin ilmavoimilla käytössään sellaista tilannetta varten, että sen koneita vaurioitetaan lennon aikana, jolloin nämä välineet saadaan pelastettua sekä lentäjien yritys loikata estetään. Mutta tietenkin teorioita tästä asiasta voidaan hyvällä omallatunnolla esittää vaikka kuinka paljon, joten tietenkin nämä asiat varmaan kiehtovat kaikkia ihmisiä, jotka haluavat näistä asioista jotain tietää.


https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/