The deadliest things are not, what we suspect that they are

AC-47 "Spooky"
Picture I

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/p/the-deadliest-things-are-not-what-we.html

Kimmo  Huosionmaa

Normally people think that some nuclear weapons and STEALTH-fighters are dangerous for people but in the real life we would die for many other reasons, like walking ahead of the car, But reality is, that even more often we would die because we eat too much sugar and fat. When we are going to visit in another land, we would afraid many things like a violation, and of course, mother warned us about sex with local girls. But then we would go to sit in the same room with another tourist, who has been sitting on the bus with the person, who had the flu.


We would not have sexual contact with this person, and everything seems that this person just got cold. This flu might be very first symptoms of the worlds deadliest virus, known as Ebola. The problem with that hemorrhage fewer is that causes the first symptoms after a couple of hours and the second is, that the virus would transfer to victims blood in the spit contagion.

Nobody believes this is only the marginal case, but as we know, that the first symptoms of Ebola seem like flu, and that would cause the situation, where some Ebola-patient comes to sit next to another person in the bus. This is the worst scenario, what the CDC has ever created. The another very bad believe is that some new military systems are deadly. Of course, if some head of the state would want to go to legal war, this person would buy the next-generation fighters like JAS-Gripens from some country, and that would be legal weapons trade.

But if the head of the state would want to make genocides, would he think, that those Ebola-viruses are perfect for that operation, but the laboratories would be problematic, because if somebody finds out that the tissue samples of that virus would be transferred to the cell plantages, and then the virus can be produced from the single organism. But if that organism would release in the wrong place, would that cause the death of the head of the state. So this person might want to do this dirty job with some equipment, what is unseen for normal people.

The deadliest aircraft in the world is gunship if the firing operation would be targeted against infantry. By using modified cargo-planes with rapid action machine guns could only a couple of persons kill even thousands of people. In theory, four or eight mercenary soldiers, who operate with two AC-47 gunships can control entire state in Africa. In this case, the unit has two Dakotas, with GAU-2 miniguns, and they operate nonstop. The other crew must, of course, rest while another gunship operates. And there is a pilot and co-pilot, who operates miniguns and the loader, who change the ammo belts for that weapon.


The minigun can operate from the cockpit by installing the electric switch to the control stick of that plane, and the aiming for those weapons could happen by using video-and infrared cameras, what is used for locating the heat leaks in buildings. Those systems can be connected to the screens, what are in the cockpit, and then the system is ready for work, and when we are thinking about Vietnam, there was the jungle, what protected Viet-Cong fighters.


But in Africa, there would be no protection against this weapon. If the opponent has no anti-aircraft missiles like BUK-system, they would be in very big trouble. If those opponents are guerillas, they have realistic chance to buy the Stingers or SA-14 missiles, what can harm that gunship, but there is only one problem. Selling weapons to guerillas is strictly prohibited. And if someone wants to sell those shoulder-shooting missiles for guerillas, that salesman must be quite sure, that the guerrillas would win, and they would not tell that story to the international press.


Of course, that gunship is also illegal, if it has bought during the conflict. But the governments have one head start for guerillas, they diside, when the war can be started, and if some area would be rebellious, can the government buy military equipment, and when the storages are full of weapons, would it tell the rebellion to the world. And if the conflict is not known, it would not have existed. This is the golden rule in international politics.

Sources:

Picture I

https://media.defense.gov/2005/Dec/29/2000570863/-1/-1/0/051128-F-1234P-051.JPG

Why Sergeant Meyer stole C-130E Hercules in 1969, and why he disappeared?

HC-130
(Picture I)

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/why-sergeant-meyer-stole-c-130e.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/war-articles/a-stolen-military-plane-in-1969.html

In 1969 at Great Britain one man stole an aircraft and then flew it somewhere, and this man Sergeant Meyer didn't ever found. The aircraft, what this Sergeant stole was C-130E and this thing is quite mysterious. The story itself is behind the links on above and below the text, and you might read that story from those articles. But here I must say, that there are many strange things, what makes this case so interesting.


C-130's  were used in some top secret missions in Vietnam, and one of those missions were used that airplane as the  gunship, another was electronic intelligence and the last one was using that aircraft as the launch platform for "Firebee" drones, and they also dropped  BLU-82 "Daisy Cutter" bombs to the Vietnamese targets. Also, those airplanes gave airborne refueling for combat helicopters like MH-53 Super Jolly Green Giants, what were used in special air rescue missions.  If that Meyer took part in those operations, that would cause the violence in that man, because PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) causes that kind of symptoms, like violation and headache.

MH-53 takes refueling from HC-130
(Picture II) 

The first question, what we would perhaps ask from sergeant Meyer, would be where that man believed to go with that airplane? He stole that C-130 playing captain, but there is one thing, what we must handle. This is, that there might be very strange that captain rank officer would order gasoline for the overseas flight by using C-130. Of course, Meyer introduced himself as the captain of service crew, and in this case, the role, what that man took was the material officer.


In that article is claiming that Meyer was going to home to his stepchildren, but that meeting ever happened. Meyer was lost during this flight, and that was of course very stressful for his family. Meyer had two commands to Vietnam before that flight, and then some people believed, that man was under the emotional stress. He was drinking too much in his last evening, and that caused problems in the military base and outside it, and the problems began, when Meyer drunk too much in some parties, and then became violent. This would have something to do with that man's Vietnam duties, but if that sergeant was only the chief of the ground crew or technical crew, why would he got symptoms, what are common in combat veterans.

DC-130 with "Firebee drones"
(Picture III)

So was Meyer took part of actions of flight group "Commando Vault", and AC-130 gunship missions in Vietnam. When we are thinking about those operations that flight group destroyed million of North Vietnamese trucks in Ho Chi-Minh road. If Meyer was the member of SOCOM (Special Operations Command) that man could be played lower rank, what he actually had. And here comes very good question about that Sergeant. Where did he learn to fly that C-130E? Normally all pilots of the aircraft are actually officers, and if Meyer was some SOCOM or intelligence specialist, that man could actually fly his plane straight to home.


And another mission, where that man could serve were electronic intelligence missions, where the platform, what was used was C-130 "Hercules", what was equipped with electronic intelligence equipment, and the mission of those systems was to record the signals what North-Vietnamese radars send.  Also, C-130E was used in that time top secret drone-missions, where radio-controlled "Firebee" drones send to photograph North-Vietnamese military bases. Those early drones were highly classified, and the operations of those planes were also out of public eye. So if Meyer took part in those operations, that would explain strange disappearing of that man.


For the reason of lost that man and the plane was claimed to be that USAF shot down the C-130 and the man, who stole it. But if they did that, was the reason, because of some of those missions were illegal, and Meyer wanted to keep silent? Or did he just an ordinary sergeant, who just lost control of the C-130? But also the reason for shooting that plane down could be that somebody was afraid that Meyer would try to dive his plane in some house like The Parliament of Great Britain or White House. And that action could be made because saving the innocent lives. And this is only speculation. There is no evidence about that kind of orders, and also that Meyer involved some "Air Commando" operations in Vietnam is also speculation.

Sources:

http://peteralanlloyd.com/the-use-of-drones-during-the-vietnam-war/

https://theaviationist.com/2014/07/28/ac-130-vietnam-war/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLU-82

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_Firebee

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/war-articles/a-stolen-military-plane-in-1969.html

Picture I

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/1200px-us_airforce_hc-130-741x521.jpg

Picture II
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/images/hc-130-dvic192.jpg

Picture III

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1a/DC-130H_Hercules_drone_control_with_a_pair_of_AQM-34_Firebee.JPEG

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/why-sergeant-meyer-stole-c-130e.html

"Rauhantekijät " eli AU-23 Gunship osa II

AU23 "Peacemaker"
Kuva I

AU-23 "Peacemeker" oli aikoinaan melko erikoinen ratkaisu tykkilaivaksi, mutta Vietnamin sodassa tästä koneesta saatiin melko hyviä kokemuksia, koska se oli melkein äänetön, ja lensi melko huomaamattomasti viidakon yläpuolella etsien sissejä, jota se sitten eliminoi joko infrapunatähtäimellä varustetulla M-60-konekiväärillä tai 20mm tykillä. Eli vaikka tuo kone virallisesti jäi Vietnamiin, niin siitä on rakennettu varmaan tuhansia "epävirallisia versioita", joiden teho on kuulemma erittäin hyvä, ja kyseisen koneen Cessnoista ja muista liikelentokoneista rakennettuja versioita käytetään tehokkaasti vastasissitoiminnassa monissa maailman maissa, joista osa on kyllä aseiden kieltolistalla. Mutta vaikka helikopterit ovat monien ihmisten mielestä hyviä partiointivälineitä, niin nämä "gunship"-lentokoneet ovat niitä paljon äänettömämpiä sekä tappavampia, koska varsinkin näitä potkuriversioita on varustettu mm. hybridimoottoreilla, joilla nämä laitteet voivat sitten lentää täysin ääneti viidakon yllä etsien tuhottavaa. Samoin niissä voi olla esimerkiksi mikroaaltoon perustuva suojakenttä, joka häiritsee sitä kohti ammuttujen ohjusten lentoa, ja nämä koneet voidaan varustaa tehokkaalla titanium-kevlar-komposiittipanssarilla.

Mutta se mikä tekee gunshipistä vaarallisen on se,että kyseessä on tavallinen urheilu- tai liikelentokone, joka voidaan varustaa irroitettavilla asetelineillä, ja maalata siviilivärein, jolloin sen käytöstä ei jää kiinni, Mutta kun gunshipiin liitetään modernia huipputekniikkaa, niin siitä tulee todella vaarallinen, eli jos se varustetaan mukautuvalla älypinnoitteella kuten ADAPTIV-laitteilla, joka muuttaa koneen täysin maastoon sopivaksi, voidaan gunshipin tehoa lisätä erittäin paljon, ja toki kun puhutaan huipputekniikasta, niin koko lentokonetta voidaan tietenkin lentää etäohjauksella, kuten myös sen tykkejä voidaan käyttää etäohjauksella.

Tuo ohjauslaitteisto jossa käytetään verkkotyötiloja ei vaadi sen enempää kuin tietokoneen, missä on Internet-selain, ja tuolloin kyseistä radio-ohjattavaa tappovälinettä voidaan ohjata kuten Predatoria. Kun näitä gunshipejä kehitellään, niin silloin tietenkin tulee eteen sellainen ajatus, että niiden tykit voidaan korvata hiilimonoksidilasereilla, joita käytetään myös metalliverstailla. Nämä laserit eivät sokaise ihmistä, vaan niiden teho on niin suuri, että ne leikkaavat maassa olevat kohteet kappaleiksi, ja noin 5-10 kw hiilimonoksidilaserin teho riittää varmasti taistelupanssarin leikkelemiseen palasiksi. Nämä laserit tuottavat paljon hukkalämpöä, mutta ne voidaan varustaa jäähdyttimillä, ja nämä kohteiden tuhoamiseen käytettävät laserit joko yksinkertaisesti leikkaavat sen kappaleiksi, tai sitten ne sytyttävät sen palamaan.

Eli laser-IT-tykki ei oikeastaan tuhoa kohdettaan millään räjähdyksellä, vaan se leikkaa kohti tulevan lentokoneen siiven irti. Nämä "suoran energian aseet" aiheuttavat ongelmia siksi, että jos joku asejärjestelmä käyttää lasereita kohteen tuhoamiseen, niin se ei kuluta yhtään fyysistä ammusta, jolloin joku voi sitten salaa "lainata" tätä välinettä, eikä sen käytöstä ehkä jää kiinni. Toinen mahdollisuus on käyttää laser-luoteja, jotka ovat oikeastaan patruunoita, mihin on asennettu laser-elementti, Tuo patruuna toimii siten, että kiväärin patruunassa on salamavalopulveria, joka antaa tuon lasersäteen muodostamiseen tarvittavan valonväläyksen. Jos tuollaista välinettä käytetään, jossain, niin silloin ei jää rihlajälkeä jolla ase voidaan jäljittää.

charelesfort.blogspot.fi

pseudotiedetta.blogspot.fi