What is the nature of dark matter?

Gravitation may interact through dark matter. And that means dark matter or its hypothetical particle WIMP (Weakly Interacting Massive Particle) is the connector between gravitation and visible material. 

We can think that all objects act similarly when they travel through space. When a high-speed object travels in gas, it forms a low-pressure cone behind it. In the same way, when a particle travels in spacetime, there is a similar low-pressure quantum vacuum behind it. 

When particles or objects travel in spacetime. There is always a low-pressure channel behind them. If we think that the gravitational center pulls objects very hard into it through gravitational strings, there is also another quantum cone behind that particle. The graviton that could be an extremely small particle doesn't make exceptions with this thing. 

Graviton itself may be WIMP or the WIMP is the next particle between graviton and maybe gluon. The thing is that WIMP could be the gate to the fourth dimension or energy level, where a particle loses its ability to interact with three-dimensional particles. 

The size of the gravitational string is very small. So there is a model that thing the gravitational string pulls in it is WIMP (Weakly Interacting Massive Particle), or hypothetical dark matter particle. And then the visible material particle follows that dark matter particle in its quantum low-pressure cone. 

When the gravitation is strong enough, the cone behind the object stops it. That freezing happens at the speed of light. So what is the direction in which particles travel? That depends on the symmetry of those low-pressure cones. If those cones are symmetrical or have the same strength, particles cannot move and that field traps them. 

The light cone could also introduce a situation where particles reach the speed of light. The energy that pushes the particle has the same strength as the energy that pushes the particle back. So those energy cones have the same strength. 

So how gravitation can break this model? The idea is that gravitation pulls other particles to the cone behind the particle that falls into the black hole. In that model, the other particles and radiation that come behind the particle mash it through the event horizon. 

The idea is this: gravitation interacts through dark matter. The number of those gravitational strings determines the power of the gravitational field. And in that model gravitons forming in dark matter impacts in the middle of gravitational centers. Maybe the Euclid mission can prove this thing. 

The idea is that gravitation interacts through strings that form behind gravitons. The surface area of those strings where there is an electromagnetic or quantum vacuum is so small that interaction can be seen only in the smallest parts of atoms. When the speed of the particle is high enough, the cone behind it pulls it back. And at the speed of light, the cone behind the particle pulls it back so strongly that it cannot accelerate anymore.

So if we think that gravitation is interacting with dark matter, we might make a model of a graviton. The idea is this: in the center of all gravitational centers is a point where dark matter particles (weakly interacting massive particles, WIMPs) impact.

When a graviton, or hypothetical gravitational transporter, travels out from the gravitational center, it forms the hollow quantum string behind it. That string interacts with dark matter. The idea is that WIMP is a small particle with a large quantum power field. The power field causes small energy asymmetries in particles.

And then they fall into the gravitational field, which is a group of hollow strings. Those strings are like tubes where there is quantum or electromagnetic low pressure. When visible matter starts to fall into those stirrings, that matter acts like a plug. There is low electromagnetic pressure in that string that pulls particles to the gravitational center.

Dark matter annihilation happens in all gravitational centers. The strength of that phenomenon depends on the strength of gravitation. And the number of gravitational stríngs determines the power of gravitation. 

There are two ways this could happen.

1) The WIMP travels at the front of the particle. That means the graviton channel pulls WIMP into the gravitational center. And visible material particles are traveling behind the WIMP and its quantum low-pressure channel.

2) The WIMPs impact visible particles in the quantum field opposite the gravitational center. That causes energy asymmetries where electromagnetic low-pressure forms on the particle's front side. That thing could explain the gravitational interaction.

The particle where WIMPs touch could be a gluon or a string between gluons and quarks.

Dark matter's annihilation forms gravitons. So graviton is the particle that is the result of those dark matter impacts. The idea is that when WIMPs impact, they send graviton particles around those impacts. When hypothetical gravitons travel through spacetime there is a quantum tunnel behind them. That tunnel or string pulls those particles back into the gravitational center. Even if gravitons are small particles they still interact like all other particles. 

When the graviton starts to fall, it takes WIMP particles with it. The WIMP is such a small particle that its interaction is hard to notice, and maybe that interaction where gravitons, as well as WIMPs, interact with visible matter is the gluon or string between gluons and quarks. The WIMP interacts like a hook that pulls the smallest parts of matter into the middle of the gravitational centers.

https://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/shining-a-light-on-dark-matter

https://phys.org/news/2023-08-astronomers-dark-annihilation-center-earth.html

https://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/relativity-space-astronomy-and-cosmology/dark-matter/dark-matter-annihilation/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_Newtonian_dynamics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle

Image 2) https://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/relativity-space-astronomy-and-cosmology/dark-matter/dark-matter-annihilation/

Cosmic antimatter mystery.

The antimatter is a mystery. At the beginning of the universe, the Schwinger-Effect created particle-antiparticle pairs. And one of the most interesting things in history is why only material remains. Why there was a little bit more material than antimatter? The interesting thing is could things like neutron stars form material from radiation. And could there be the Schwinger Effect in the modern universe? 

If there are magnetic fields in the universe that forms material, that thing could be one of the most revolutionary things in physics. And the principle of the Schwinger Effect is that when an electromagnetic field forms material, it forms particle-antiparticle pair. 

There is suspicion that some part of antimatter is forming during supernova explosions. In that case, the giant and extremely powerful shockwave travel through the universe. And there is a possibility that this effect turns the spin of electrons or even hadrons and forms antimatter. Or at least the supernova explosions are enough powerful that the radiation can make that thing. 

But an interesting thing is that also weaker magnetic fields like neutron stars and their radiation pikes can make that thing. Antimatter is forming in the atmosphere. When cosmic radiation turns the spin of some electrons. And that means also the atmospheres of other planets and plasma fields are the source of cosmic antimatter. 

Sometimes is introduced that some part of dark energy forms in an annihilation reaction where particle-antiparticle pairs are impacting each other. When we are talking about the annihilation and particle-antiparticle pairs we are not always talking about electron-positron pairs.

 Also, other elementary particles have anti-particle pairs. And maybe some part of dark energy forms when things like gluon-anti gluon (or boson-anti boson (or quark-anti quark)) pairs are annihilating. That thing is annihilation, similar way with the electron-positron pairs. 

But that kind of annihilation sends energy. That has a different wavelength than electron-positron annihilation. The fact is that also short-living bosons. And other high-energy particles that are short living can also make annihilation reactions. Maybe that kind of reaction is the source of dark energy, that rips the universe in pieces.  

https://scitechdaily.com/unraveling-a-cosmic-antimatter-mystery/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwinger_effect

Image: https://scitechdaily.com/unraveling-a-cosmic-antimatter-mystery/

Is dark matter the result of imperfect annihilation?

Dark matter is a mystery. There are some suspected impacts with material and dark matter in particle accelerators. But otherwise, that thing is a mystery. Dark matter could be the source of dark energy. 

There is the possibility. That dark energy is similar to neutron radiation. When radiation hits dark matter. It would release extra energy in the form of radiation or wave movement. 

Dark matter is the gravitational effect. That dominates the universe. There is the possibility that the imperfect annihilation caused the part of the material to turn to the thing that we are calling visible material. There is about 15% of material in the universe. That is visible to us. Last of it is the mysterious thing that interacts only by gravitation with visible material. 

But when we are thinking about its form there is one thing that might explain why dark matter is not visible. If we think about the string theory the material is like a yarn ball. And annihilation reaction is the case where the strings of those yarn balls are opening. 

The string theory describes the material as the ball that is formed of wave movement. There is the possibility that if the energy level of the impacting particles is not the same the annihilation would not be perfect. 

So could the dark matter be the result of the imperfect annihilation? That means that material turns to energy when a particle and its anti-particle pair will impact. The case where two particles are turning to energy is true when the particles have the same mass. 

But if the other yarn ball is bigger the annihilation is imperfect. The case is that if the energy level of the participants of annihilation is not symmetrical. And another participant is higher energetic than others the annihilation would not turn the entire material into energy. 

When the material is turning to energy in the material-antimatter impact means the impact of particles releases only the same number of strings as the lighter particle has. If we think of those particles as the yarn balls. The particle is at a higher energy level than the other is a bigger yarn ball. 

The idea is that when a particle hits its mirror particle it can turn only its mass of material to energy. So if the electron and positron are impacting and the energy level of the other participant of the annihilation is higher. That causes that there are remainings of the higher energetic particle. 

So, at the beginning of the universe. There was the Big Bang. The event, that released all material and energy to the universe. Or there is a theory that at the first released wave movement. Then that wave movement turned to particle-antiparticle pairs. And after that happened the big annihilation that formed the elementary particles. 

But if we are thinking about the Big Bang. And particle wave-movement duality we are facing one interesting thing. When crossing wave movements form material. They are forming the antimatter-material pairs. So that thing means that there is the possibility that the energy levels of those particle pairs were different. 

And that means the annihilation between them would be imperfect. So if we think like that. There is the possibility that the asymmetry in annihilation caused the visible material and dark matter to form. 

The energy asymmetry causes an effect. The particles of dark matter and visible material are not the same sizes. So we cannot see the radiation that comes from the dark matter. So could that radiation be dark energy? There is the possibility that dark energy is similar to neutron radiation. That thing would form. 

When the particles of dark matter will stress with radiation. And after energy stress, those invisible particles will release their extra energy as a radiation burst. The fact is that dark matter is dominating. And should we ask like this? Is the visible material result of imperfect annihilation? 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annihilation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_particle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

Maybe scientists are making the first direct observation about dark energy quite soon.

All energy must have a source. Any energy is not forming from emptiness. The wave-particle duality means the energy or wave movement can turn to particles. And otherwise, the particle can turn to energy.  One of the sources of energy is the particles that are slowing. When the particle is slowing it must transfer the kinetic energy to somewhere. 

And that transfer happens in the form of wave movement. The thing that makes energy visible has an opponent in the structure. The energy that is sent by a certain size particle makes the same-size particle resonate. And that resonance is making the radiation or wave movement visible. If there is no opponent for sending particles the wave movement that those particles send is unable or very hard to detect. 

That means the dark energy could be the radiation that source is in unique size of particles. When those particles interact with each other they are causing the gravitational effect with those individual particles and particles of the visible material.

Dark energy means the wave movement that is invisible to us. Sometimes there is introduced an idea. That part of that energy is coming out from free quarks or neutrinos. The idea of that theory is when a quark or neutrino is traveling outside the visible universe there is a gravitational effect that starts to slow that particle. 

When that particle is slowing it sends wave movement that is hard to detect because the sending particle is so small. So could the origin of some part of dark energy be some extremely small particles like quarks, neutrinos, or even Higgs bosons or some still not known particles? 

Or is the source of dark energy in the interaction of the particles of dark matter? And are those invisible particles some very well-known particles? We don't have quarks or Higgs boson clouds in the visible universe. But outside the edge of the visible universe could be the conditions where those particles are free and outside the visible universe could be the Higgs boson clouds that are sending the emission radiation. 

In some theories, dark energy is coming from the very first particles released after the Big Bang. Those particles are traveling at the front of the bubble of visible material. And maybe some of them are starting to split. We have seen when neutrons are splitting. But same way, sooner or later the quarks and neutrinos are turning to wave movement or splitting. And in that process is releasing the wave movement. So could the part of dark energy come from splitting neutrinos that exist outside the visible material? 

Before visible material is released or protons or neutrons started to form the material was in the form of quarks. During the Big Bang released quarks and antiquarks. So if there was some kind of great annihilation after the Big Bang. That annihilation happened between quark and antiquark and electron and positron pairs. Maybe during that process formed some still unknown particles. Those particles would travel ahead of the visible material. 

And maybe some of those particles are turning to wave movement outside the visible material. And that thing releases energy in the form of wave movement. 

We know that dark energy exists. We know that is wave movement which origin is somewhere. And maybe some of it comes from particles that are known. But which form is different than we know. We don't know how far the universe continues after the edge of the visible universe. The dark matter clouds can continue very far away from the visible material. 

And we don't know cases where the neutrinos or Higgs bosons are stopping in our universe. But when those particles fly outside the universe they would slow because of the gravitational effect. And outside the visible universe is possible to find things like stopped Higgs bosons and neutrinos. Even they have not existed in the space where we are living. 

The thing is that we should determine the direction where the dark energy travels. Does it pull or push the edge of the universe outside? The thing that makes this thing interesting does the dark energy travel through the visible universe. Or does it come from the center of the universe? 

If the source of dark energy is outside the visible universe we might think that dark energy is the wave movement that has an extremely short or long wavelength. So the wave movement travels through the visible universe and affects the particles that are at the opposite side of the bubble that we call the universe. 

The fact is that dark energy exists. And that means there must be some source for that mysterious thing that is even more dominating than dark matter. The source of the dark energy could be somewhere where we cannot even imagine. 

https://scitechdaily.com/a-particle-physics-experiment-may-have-directly-observed-dark-energy/

Antimatter might have a bigger role in the material than we have thought.

Artistic rendering of quarks in deuterium. Credit: Ran Shneor (Image: I) 

The antimatter is the thing that is the most high-energetic in the world. When an antimatter particle impacts its mirror particle the result is an extremely high energetic annihilation. In an annihilation reaction, those particles turn to energy. Or if we are very accurate when the antimatter hits material it pulls the strings that are forming particles open. And the extremely high energetic radiation would start to travel through the space. 

So why the annihilation releases so much energy? Some people are saying that the energy impulse is releasing when the superstrings are open. Is like the slam of the whip but the size of the actors is smaller. The thing is that when the wave movement that formed the particles is moving ahead with extremely high speed. The head of the string can move faster than the ball-shaped photon. 

The reason for that is. The head of the wave movement is fitting between quantum fields easier than a ball-shaped photon.

The wave movement form of the light is the flat photon. So the speed of a flat photon is higher than the ball-shaped photon until it hits the quantum field and turns to particle form. 

But the thing is that annihilation is possible only between mirror-particles. So the anti-electron or positron would not annihilate with the proton. And one of the most interesting things in the world is that inside the proton are antimatter particles. Those particles are inside the quantum field of the proton. And there is an asymmetry in the antimatter quarks. The thing is that the antimatter quarks are between normal quarks.

But the anti-down quark between the up-quarks should not cause an annihilation reaction. When the proton is destroying or split one of the reasons for that is that the quantum fields around them are turning too big. The gluons cannot keep those mirror particles separated. So the antiquarks will touch each other and then the internal annihilation destroys the proton. The thing that makes quantum annihilation interesting.  

Adjustment of the quark annihilation is more accurate than annihilation between higher particles. That thing means that quark-antiquark annihilation can use the energy supply for nanomachines. Or that reaction can destroy cancer cells from the body. 

https://www.britannica.com/science/annihilation

https://phys.org/news/2021-10-quarks-antiquarks-high-momentum-foundations.html?fbclid=IwAR3t304m-q5xFD0KKqYys9DufSIEBlvt-2K480ij3GY1Mb5bmMuKv-PcEgk

(Image I) https://phys.org/news/2021-10-quarks-antiquarks-high-momentum-foundations.html?fbclid=IwAR3t304m-q5xFD0KKqYys9DufSIEBlvt-2K480ij3GY1Mb5bmMuKv-PcEgk

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

Crystal skulls, annihilation and artificial brains

This text is not handing morals and ethics about the use of the cloned neurons in computers. Those things are the thing that is different from technical solutions. So the law books are the thing that limits this kind of thing. 

The reason why the researchers are interested in the use of cloned neurons is clear. For making more powerful computers the cloned neurons are the ultimate tool. Human brains use 20 watts of electricity and they are much powerful than any known computer. The reason why the cloned neurons are causing problems is that they have their own will. And the second thing is that the cloned neurons are problematic in the point of view of memory handling. Memory handling means that the memories of the neurons cannot remove.

The modern bio- and life support technology can make the modern crystal skull-looking biological computer possible. So are those artifacts attempt to talk with the dead? If somebody steals a corpse for that kind of test that brings prosecution

Maybe the next part of this text is science fiction. But even if the famous crystal skull of the British museum is made to store the dead people's brain waves. In that case, brains will be put in the skull. And then the electricity is put to travel through that tissue. Then it will be stored to record. The fact is that even if that strange artifact could be fake, its purpose could be serious. 

The electricity of the brain the EEG can store to the tape. And then transmit to the brains of other people. But I don't know if this thing is possible to use by using dead brain tissue. The EEG can store easily during the EEG tests. Then that thing can be played by using the record player. 

But the cloned neurons and modern equipment make it possible to create cloned brains. Or in some ideas, the crystal skull can use for making "human robots". In those ideas, the pineal gland of the person would be put in the crystal skull. And the electric signals will send through that organ to the crystal skull. But the thing is that this kind of writings might seem non-scientific. 

And the fact is that there have been made many experiments during history that were not successful. The occultists and other groups made many things that were illegal or against morals. They stole corpses and bones from cemeteries and made many things that are causing imprisonment or even sending them to mental hospitals. 

When the cloned neurons are finishing their mission their memories should remove.  And that is the problem with the "living" or biological computers.  But there has been introduced an idea of the modern "crystal skull". In the chamber will make the artificial brains by using cloned neurons. 

And then that structure will connect to the platform and the decoding system by using neck nerves. Then data will download to the brain structure by using brain-core stimulation. And then the data will put to travel through the brain cells. That thing means that the system will act as the biocomputer. And the heart-lung machine can deliver nutrients for those cells. 

What if the crystal skulls were an attempt to talk with the dead? Or are they more frightening things?

By the way, the tale about the 12 crystal skulls that can destroy the world can be true even if those crystal skulls were fake. There is the possibility that to the eyes of the skull is put the leaf gold. And then the high energetic cathode ray will aim at those eyes. The system might work that behind the skulls is put a magnet and then the cathode ray will strike to leaf gold. That thing can use natural electricity. And if the lightning strikes through the leaf gold layer that can cause an annihilation reaction.

If those artifacts were fakes made for some occultists in the late 19th century. That is not a guarantee that the purpose of those merchandise is legal. There is the possibility that the occultists wanted to "steal" memories of the dead. And then they made those crystal skulls and then put brains in those systems. Then they could conduct the electricity to that thing. And after that, because they were afraid of authorities they took those crystal skulls to the jungle. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_skull

https://writingsaboutmysteries.blogspot.com/

Are the gravitons primordial black holes inside protons, neutrons and electrons?

Above: "Three colored balls (symbolizing quarks) connected pairwise by springs (symbolizing gluons), all inside a gray circle (symbolizing a proton). The colors of the balls are red, green, and blue, to parallel each quark's color charge. The red and blue balls are labeled "u" (for "up" quark) and the green one is labeled "d" (for "down" quark)". Wikipedia/Quarks)

If we want to guess the certain place of the hypothetical graviton in the material there are two possible places. The place where the researchers can find hypothetical graviton is the center point of the proton and neutron. Or another possible place is in the middle of the quarks. In that version, the quarks are like the ball of yarn, like electrons. And they are formed when superstrings are forming the ball around the extremely small primordial black hole. The quantum gravity of that primordial black hole would pull the protons and neutrons together. 

Can the graviton be found just in the middle of the proton and neutron? The idea is that when gluons are jumping in the proton and neutron. By using the trajectory that looks like a triangle. That thing can from the primordial black hole in the proton and neutron. That means the graviton could be the thing that formed from the wave movement. 

So does graviton even have the physical form? Is it the primordial black hole? The extremely small-size primordial black hole is more like a power field than some kind of particle. That power field is turned to the package like a particle or ball of yarn. 

So is the annihilation the impact of two primordial black holes that are locating in protons or neutrons? In that idea, the electrons are the balls of the superstrings. That is forming a ball around the primordial black hole. In that case, the superstring is denying the eruption of the black hole.

And that extremely small black hole will get its energy from the spin of electrons. In that case, the size of the black hole is so small, that it cannot curve the wave movement inside it. Or the superstrings are forming the ball near that miniature singularity. That is smaller than any particle in the world. The same thing that is written about electrons can transform into quarks. 

If the graviton is the primordial black hole inside the proton or neutron that could explain, why it's so hard to detect. The primordial black hole requires energy pumping all the time. And in this scenario. The primordial black hole that is smaller than quarks or gluons is getting its energy from the movement of the gluons. If that movement is stopping the primordial black hole vaporizes immediately. 

Can we find graviton in the place where nobody predicts to find that kind of particle? The idea is that in the protons and neutrons is the group of quarks. And between those quarks are traveling particles called gluons. The gluons are something like electrons, but their size and effective range are different. The gluon is the transmitter particle of the strong nuclear force. 

So in the cores of protons and neutrons is the "quantum flashes of lightning" between quarks that are forming a similar effect with lightning. But in the smaller distances. When the gluon is traveling it sends energy waves both ways. The energy that the gluon gets is similar to kinetic energy with the balls that people are throwing. 

But the scale of this thing is extremely small. Gluons are jumping inside protons and neutrons. And then the Law of Energy Indecision means that the gluon must take energy load from somewhere or they will stop and material is disappearing. So is the energy source of the gluons some kind of primordial black hole? And is that black hole the graviton hypothetical transportation particle of the gravitation. 

The movement energy of gluons travels outer ways or to the core of protons and neutrons. And also the part of the energy that is stored in muons while they are jumping between the quarks is traveling in the middle point of the proton or neutron. So there is the possibility that there is graviton in the middle of protons and neutrons. 

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluon

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primordial_black_hole

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark

Image: ()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark

()https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/