A relationship between social and printed media

Kimmo Huosionmaa


When we are talking about trusted media, we must say that of course printed newspapers are very high ranking and professional way to make media, but in some cases that thing have been caused even genocides. The problem is that some dictators are used printed newspaper against their political oppositions. In those cases, the "faked news" are caused the persecutions and violence against persons, who have talked against the dictators. This is one way to say, that many times dangerous is use trusted media for getting power in the state. I mean here, that also printed media can be used as developing the faked news and lies for people.


And this kind of misuse of media is always very dangerous because people are always trusted the media. But when we are thinking about social media, what is very unreliable, we must see one thing. When we are walking on the street, we don't have to look Facebook all the time. And we can remove that application from the telephones. That means we can just watch that thing couple of times per day. And the problem with social media is of course that if the people would use that thing, they might uncover very big secrets, or what do you think that somebody would publish the images from the house, where is guns on the wall. That kind of things is very bad for public safety.


But when we are thinking the role of social media, we must not stare that all the time, and when we are talking about the use of social media, those applications are meant to use together. So the all writings should be published in WordPress or Blogger, and then the links can be shared on Facebook etc. If we are thinking about working day and social media, we must say that the time for social media can leave outside the working day, if that feels disturbing. But the use of social media sometimes uncovers the little secrets, like that some worker, who is claimed to be an engineer has no training or education at all.


This might cause the little bit embarrassing situation if some team leader has been played an engineer, and then the dirty secret would be uncovered. In that case, somebody might want to ask, "why that person has not done anything".  And of course, if somebody writes bullshit or prosecutes somebody without evidence, can this person take to court. This is one very complicated question of social media. Superiority has right to deny the use of social media in working time, but if there find the things that are illegal, that would make possible to prosecute this person in the courtroom.


Nobody wants to be the asshole in the eyes of the family, and that would be a reason why some directors are wanted to deny the use of social media. But sometimes the reason for denying the social media is more complicated. There are cases that some other reasons were behind the blocking the social media, and one of them is, that worker keeps sick leave, but then there would be the picture, where this person sits on the terrace and drinks beer. That would be little embarrassing thing.

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/about-relationship-about-social-and.html

The personal relationships are very complicated thing.

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When superiority would get information that henchman would violate other, same ranking person, must this superiority be very careful. The report might be unnecessary and made by the purpose to change some person from the workplace. The most important thing, in this case, is to observe and investigate this situation, and then make decisions about the case. Maybe the reporter was overreacting to something normal because this reporter’s personal life has changed problematic.


The reason for overreaction might cause the divorce or death case in this person’s social environment, and that might cause the report of violating. But of course those reports can make for some real reason, and in this case, the violator must stop the actions, what causes that reaction. In those cases, the balance and justly actions to stop that violating are the necessary thing, and the violator must realize that this way to act is not right for the firm or other workers. But sometimes the target of those reports is some superiority of the company. That person, who is targeted for the report is sometimes a team leader.


And if the reporter would change the job after the report, would it cause that this reporter is childish. When there would be no procedures for the violating would be done, and the henchman would change the fob, that can cause the wrong attitude of the henchman. But if that happens simultaneously every time when this boss is targeted for reports, would that means that the boss misuses the position, and makes other persons be quiet about those cases, where that boss is suspected as the violating behavior. But then we must say, that sometimes the divorcements from the job causes personal reasons.


And of course, if somebody has the heavy drinking problem that person can be kicked off. In those cases would be very reasonable to mention, that the person is kicked off because of drinking. In some cases, the person, who has said or written something against the leaders of the companies would kick off. But the reason for that might be hired from other workers. The most common reason would be productive reasons, but sometimes I have thought that the person is kicked off for some other reasons.



Boss has always right to divorce the henchman if there are problems with that worker, but there is sometimes difficult to tell that to the person, who has been kicked off. This is the problem in those cases that reason for kicking off causes for the personal relationship. The boss might think that hiding the reason might be easier for the company and the directors if the real reason for the divorcement would cover, and in some cases, the reason for hiding things like drinking in the workplace can cause that the boss has let the drunken person drive vehicles. That will look like the bad thing if that kind of behaviors would uncover. If there caused some accidents,  that would cause long and expensive juridical process against that kind of companies, and those processes would get the bosses and henchmen to jail if there were some accidents. And the things would be proven in the courtroom.


That would cause problems in new places because if the reason is being drunk in the workplace or in the worst case driving some vehicle like the truck. If that kind of cases will be hidden, could that the person continue drinking in the new place and cause terrible accidents. Or if the reason for kicking off might be violence, that person could even kill somebody in next place.

http://marxjatalous.blogspot.fi/p/the-personal-relationships-are-very.html

The Royal Library of Alexandria

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-royal-library-of-alexandria.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-royal-library-of-alexandria.html

The secrets of SR-71 "Blackbird"

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-secrets-of-sr-71-blackbird.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-secrets-of-sr-71-blackbird.html

Was Kaspar Hauser: one of the most mysterious persons in the history of Europe the hidden son of Napoleon Bonaparte?

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/was-kaspar-hauser-one-of-most.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/was-kaspar-hauser-one-of-most.html