The new evidence of the existence of Planet X

"An artist’s conception of Planet 9, or Planet X, which scientists theorize orbits in the distant solar system. Image credit: Robin Dienel/ Carnegie Institution of Washington" (NASA)

Planet X is never seen. That is one of the things that we should realize. Planet X is the mysterious gravitational effect at the edge of our solar system. The existence of that object is almost confirmed in one day. And some other day that strange thing doesn’t exist anymore. The thing that makes it very interesting is that the gravitational effect that makes Neptune’s trajectory wobble and the mysterious X-ray flares in Uranus are things that can cause many speculations. 

And one of them is that. There is a planet that is colder than the plasma around the sun. If the planet’s temperature is lower than the heliopause’s temperature and the planet’s trajectory is outside that point, this kind of object can be very hard to detect. The prediction is this, if Planet X really exists it would be geologically dead. It could be the rogue planet that our sun or the outer planets Neptune and Uranus are trapped near the edge of the solar system. It’s possible that this mysterious gravitational object has gone out from the solar system’s gravitational pool. And turned into a rogue planet. 

Uranus’s X-ray flares. 

Dwarf planet Haumea with Rings and its two moons Hiʻiaka (Haumea 1) and Namaka (Haumea 2). 

Artist impression of Quaoar rings. Credit: Paris Observatory

Artist's impression of Quaoar with its ring and its moon Weywot

The primordial black hole hypothesis. 

But there is also the possibility that Planet X is something like a black hole. In some scenarios, a very small black hole can pull a shell around it. In some models, the small black hole can exist in asteroid-size objects. Or even on some planets. The small black hole must only pull dust or ice around it symmetrically. If those particles are locked around that black hole they can form a structure that looks like a regular planet. So could some of the dwarf planets in the Kuiper belt be that mysterious Planet X? 

There is one object that can be interesting about the researchers. That object is the dwarf planet Quaoar. The thing that makes that dwarf planet very interesting is its ring system. That dwarf planet should have a very weak gravity. Sometimes astronomers and I thought that some kind of plasma whirling around that small dwarf planet makes the Van Allen-belt type magnetic phenomenon that can trap the low-energy plasma that comes from the sun. Another remarkable thing is that Quaoar has a moon called Weywot. And if that artist’s impression is right, that means that this moon is quite a long distance from Quaoar. 

The third interesting thing is that the Quaoar’s temperature is 41 K which is -231.3C. There is suspicion that some kind of radioactive process warms the Quaoar. But the primordial black hole can explain that temperature. 

But there is one very wild idea. Could Quaoar be the primordial black hole that formed the ice shell around it? Maybe that thing seems very rare, or radical theory. But if the planet X is some kind of primordial black hole, can that thing be some dwarf planet that we already know? That primordial black hole can seem very innocent if it's in some dwarf planet. And then we can look at another dwarf planet: Haumea. An interesting thing is that Haumea has two moons. 

When we look at images of Haumea we see that the little world with two moons is stretched. Haumea itself looks like an egg. That thing can happen because of the fast spin. Or it can happen because some force from that thing stretches the Haumea. Those two moons should destroy Haumea’s ring system. The names of those moons are Hiʻiaka (Haumea 1) and Namaka (Haumea 2)

The primordial black hole that is in the stable trajectory and pulls particle shells around it can be very hard to separate from the real dwarf planets. If there are no objects near that thing, we cannot measure the object’s mass using those things. If that black hole pulls all dust from around it. That thing prevents astronomers from seeing dust clouds from around it. 

https://astrobites.org/2025/04/28/vulcan-pbh/

https://www.astronomy.com/science/is-planet-nine-a-black-hole-or-a-planet-harvard-scientists-suggest-a-way-to-find-out/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/49910160

https://www.buffalo.edu/news/releases/2024/12/primordial-black-holes-may-be-hiding-in-planets-or-even-everyday-objects-here-on-Earth.html

https://chandra.harvard.edu/blog/node/786

https://nasaspacenews.com/2025/04/black-holes-from-the-big-bang-could-be-trapped-inside-our-planet/

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/07/were-seeing-something-massive-out-there-astronomers-detect-possible-ninth-planet-beyond-neptune-in-chilling-new-discovery/

https://scitechdaily.com/dark-matters-secret-hideouts-are-primordial-black-holes-lurking-nearby/

https://www.space.com/primordial-black-holes-cat-big-bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haumea

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hi%CA%BBiaka_(moon)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namaka_(moon)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaoar

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weywot

Evolution can be faster than we even dare to think.

***********************************************************************'

"Samples taken from China's Tiangong space station contained a new, mysterious microbe that hasn't been seen on Earth, a recent paper published in the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology revealed."

"The microbe, named Niallia tiangongensis — it was named after the space station — is a never-before-seen strain of an earthborne bacteria specially adapted to off-planet life." 

(https://futurism.com/the-byte/bacteria-china-space-station)

***********************************************************************'

Researchers found previously unknown bacteria from a Chinese space station. That means. Those bacteria could be from outer space. But it's more probable that those organisms formed in that space station. That new organism formed in an isolated environment. 

That tells how fast evolution can be. That shows how bacteria can transform faster than we expected. This observation causes discussions about so-called mirror organisms. And other artificial lifeforms' safety orders. Those organisms can be catastrophes if they leak in nature. That's why there is programmed cell death in those cells. 

That should destroy those organisms. But there is the possibility that the DNA damage removes those sequences. And turns those bacteria into similar to human zombie cells. The term zombie cell means a cell that should finish its mission. And then destroy itself. Somehow. The self-destruction failed. That turns the cell into a zombie. Same way, that thing can happen to artificial cells. Those cells can also produce super-strong enzyme acids. That means the natural organism cannot win that organism. 

There are two types of evolution. A natural evolution. And artificial, or controlled evolution. It is also possible. That artificial organism faces unpredicted advances. Artificial organisms are used in medical factories and places. Where researchers work with complicated amino acids and enzymes. 

Those genetically engineered organisms are used to produce those extremely complicated molecules. The bad thing is that those genetically engineered cells are also exposed to evolution. Those cells degenerate, connect DNA from other cells, and face DNA damage just like natural cells.

Below is the article from Byte:  

*************************************************************************

https://futurism.com/the-byte/bacteria-china-space-station

*******************************************************************

"Just four DNA differences in one small region of the genome may help explain why humans have bigger, more complex brains than chimps. These tweaks drive neuron growth—but may also raise the risk of neurological disease. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, 4 Tiny DNA Tweaks That Supercharged the Human Brain)

Controlled evolution means that some abilities will be highlighted in the research. That involves the cells and organisms reprogramming. That kind of thing involves things. Like mirror organisms, superintelligent creatures, and many other things that we thought were SciFi tales. The ability to manipulate genomes creates new opportunities for R&D work in genetic engineering. 

The deep knowledge of genomes makes it possible to fix DNA damage. And remove hereditary diseases. Genetic therapy is as easy to give as a vaccine, or some other medical injection. The problem is how to make enough DNA. That it can reprogram enough cells so that the transformation turns stable. Success requires deep knowledge of the genetic code. The mistake can cause a very big catastrophe. 

The ability to control genomes also makes things like eternal life possible. Eternal life requires the system can change the mitochondria's DNA and replace the DNA from the cell's nucleus by using fresh DNA. That kind of thing requires large-scale technology that can switch DNA using ultimate accuracy. 

Nanotechnology, artificial intelligence, and global DNA mapping bring more information about our hereditary benefits. Researchers found four DNA bites that make our brains unique. And that kind of thing can make things like intelligent pets possible. Things like genetic engineering can help us to win things like cancer. Genetically boosted immune cells can locate cancer and zombie cells. And then destroy those cells immediately. The problem is how those immune cells find zombie cells. 

The genetic engineering happens out of the cell. They must make customized DNA. Using polymerase chain reaction, PCR. The PCR system multiplies DNA bites where the wanted DNA sequences are. Then the nanomechanical systems can cut those DNA into bites. And collect new DNA using those bites. After that, engineers must just remove the DNA from the nucleus. And then replace that DNA using the custom, or fixed DNA bites. This kind of ability makes it possible to create new organisms. 

https://futurism.com/the-byte/bacteria-china-space-station

https://www.sciencealert.com/unknown-species-of-bacteria-discovered-in-chinas-space-station

https://scitechdaily.com/4-tiny-dna-tweaks-that-supercharged-the-human-brain/

https://scitechdaily.com/our-dna-may-evolve-much-faster-than-previously-thought/

Lunar space stations are under planning.

"The Gateway space station will be humanity’s first space station around the Moon as a vital component of the Artemis missions to return humans to the lunar surface for scientific discovery and chart the path for the first human missions to Mars. Astronauts on Gateway will be the first humans to call deep space home during missions where they will use Gateway to conduct science and prepare for lunar surface missions. Credit: NASA, Alberto Bertolin, Bradley Reynolds" (ScitechDaily, NASA and SpaceX Are Building the Most Advanced Space Station Ever – In Lunar Orbit)

NASA and Space X are planning a new space station orbiting the moon. This station would offer a good base for moon research and can also operate as a platform for lunar-orbiting operations. Those systems make it possible to test the modular- self-assembling structures. 

The lunar-orbiting space station can use things like space hooks to raise spacecraft from the moon. That decreases the need for fuel. Another way to make the moon operations cheaper is to use mass drivers. 

Mass-drivers are giant electromagnetic rails to launch capsules from the moon to Earth. 

All those capsules must not have the ability to transport a crew. The mass driver can also transport one or two person- capsules to the Earth. 

The journey to the moon station can happen in two stages. The first launch system transports crew to the Earth-orbiting space station. Or Earth orbiter. At the orbiter, the launch system separated. 

Then the moon transport stage docked to the shuttle. In the last case, there is no need for travel between those crafts. The operation on the moon is far easier than on Earth. The moon shuttle can be like a cylinder. 

Those self-assembling structures mean that the space station is made of modules that can dock together from remote control. That kind of system is a very good thing for many civil and military operations on the moon. The large telescopes on the moon can serve as scientific and intelligence instruments. 

Those telescopes see things like stars. And they also see military bases on Earth. Lunar orbiting- and lunar base large telescopes can serve both: civil and military purposes. Large space telescopes can operate at longer distances from Earth than traditional recon satellites. That protects them against land-based ASAT systems. 

The national interest of the lunar missions is the reason for the threat that somebody makes the missile base on the moon. During the Cold War era, the Soviet Luna-16 spacecraft was believed to be the test for nuclear weapon launch from the moon. The missile can be the rocket that landed on the Moon. Then the operators will launch it using the remote control. 

Then we think about things like Mars missions. 

Those missions require nuclear rockets. Nuclear rockets can be assembled at the Earth orbiter.  The system can be modular. The rocket's modules will be launched from Earth. 

Then system docks those modules together at the Earth orbiter. The AI-controlled systems can put those modules together. The only difficult thing is how to make the body that is long enough to keep the reactor as far from the crew as possible. The radioactive radiation from the reactor is dangerous.  

But otherwise, the simple shield between the reactor and crew module is enough. The nuclear-powered unmanned systems require radiation shields because that radiation damages computers and disturbs other instruments.  The main problem is nuclear rocket fuel. The lightweight reactors require very highly enriched nuclear fuel. 

The highly enriched plutonium or neptunium is dangerous. If there is some kind of accident. Highly radioactive materials will pollute large areas. It's possible to transport that Mars craft to the Moon's orbiter. Where the nuclear fuel can transfer to the reactor. The launch system can carry those nuclear elements to the Moon orbiter in very strong capsules. In small doses.  And if there are some problems debris falls to the Moon. 

https://scitechdaily.com/nasa-and-spacex-are-building-the-most-advanced-space-station-ever-in-lunar-orbit/

How are the material and space formed?

When we think about space and material we can say that material is only a dense part of space. That means there is something that makes space denser at the point where is material. And that thing makes the material so interesting. 

Material is not separate from space and the universe the bubble that involves all known material. So the material is part of the universe. Not separated from it. And the universe is part of a bigger entirety called space. 

Nobody knows what is outside the universe. There could be a cosmic vacuum where is only wave motion. That travels away from the universe. That vacuum pulls the universe larger and larger. 

In this model time is the energy. When the universe expands it turns colder and colder. 

This process continues until the universe reaches energy same energy level as the space around it. When the energy in the universe ends. And all particles turn to wave motion. At that moment, the universe's existence as the quantum system ends. 

Of course, somebody says that wave motion and superstrings still exist. And information about the universe remains. But this is not a story about the ultimate fate of the universe. 

Universe also involves a strange gravitational effect that is unknown to us. And maybe there are other universes, but maybe we can never confirm that thing. So multiverse is more philosophy than scientific theory. 

But when we are talking about dark matter. We should rather talk about dark gravitation or gravitational effect whose source is unknown. 

Same way dark energy is the wave motion whose source is unknown. The only thing that we know about dark energy is that strange wave motion rips the universe into pieces. 

And in some theories, the source of that dark interaction is in strings between quarks. When those energy channels are oscillating that sends wave motion across space. And because that interaction affects so small structures that explain why it's so hard to detect. 

But dark energy and dark matter tell that some structure is common to all particles. And that structure that is involved in all particles is the thing that we can call graviton. Or is it so? The thing is that we should look at this structure somewhere in the elementary particles. 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

There is the possibility that the source of gravitation is at the core of the particle. 

The idea of this model is that a particle with high-speed spin forms electromagnetic low-pressure near its core. And then, the wave motion from space will travel to that particle. 

In that model, the particle is like a whisk. The quantum lightning or superstrings surround some internal structure. When that particle spins at high speed. It forms electromagnetic low-pressure near its core. 

The idea is that the quantum vapor forms when the quantum field around the particle turns weaker. And the reason for that is the expansion of the universe. That thing makes particles "hairy". That hair is the superstrings were magnetic or quantum fields touch. 

 And sometimes those "hairs" are touching the quantum field around the particle. That moves energy to that particle. But that hair also sends wave motion through that quantum field. So that thing explains both dark energy and gravitation. 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

When we are thinking about material and the smallest known particles there is a possibility that the elementary particles are the power fields. Or they are formed of superstrings that make them look like a whisk-looking structure.  In this model, the superstrings (or quantum lightning) are orbiting the central structure of the particles.  And that structure explains why the qubit is possible. 

If that whisk-looking structure spins at a very fast speed. That could push electromagnetic or quantum fields away from that particle. That thing forms the electromagnetic low pressure near the particle. So, could the gravitation be the effect that forms at the surface of the elementary particle? 

Space is important from the point of view of civil and military.

Image 1) Large-size air-launched rockets can also have an ASAT capacity. 

Space is the last of frontiers. Even if there are rules up there, regular people cannot ever see satellites or they see only their cores. If, they have telescopes. 

Spaceborne positioning is important for GPS-homing, smart munitions. And those munitions are the most effective actors on the battlefield. Also, satellites are the ultimate tools for reconnaissance missions. Military communication satellites are delivering orders to strategic missile submarines. That makes those satellites military targets. 

And they can be like an eye that watches the ground. If military forces can destroy those communication satellites it can deny the SLBM submarines to get their launching codes. Destroying the positioning satellites makes the GPS ammunition ineffective. 

Image 2:) F-15 Releases ASAT

They fly high above Earth. So regular anti-aircraft systems cannot threaten satellites. 

The ground-based ASAT-capable missiles are very large tools. And they are "easy to destroy" if the weapon system can lock to those targets. The ASAT missiles also install in naval vessels. 

Submarine-based ASAT weapons can destroy things like positioning satellites. Many of those land- or sea-based missiles are modified SLBM- or ICBM weapons. But larger rockets like Delta IV and its variants can rise the ASAT weapons to orbital trajectory. 

But ASAT weapons can also install on aircraft. The system that bases F-15 and quite a small missile is interesting. The coordinates upload to the weapon itself. It's connected to the autopilot. Then the ASAT will drive the fighter to the right position and releases itself. And the pilot can fly the aircraft home. 

Image 3:) X-37B

Image 3B:) 

Miniature shuttle, by Virgin Galactic corporation. Similar shuttles can use in the same missions with X-37B.

And one mission of the miniature shuttles like X-37B might work as an ASAT weapon. The air-launched ASAT systems are easy to transport to the way of the targeted satellite's trajectory. Things like the Pegasus rocket can modify into an ASAT missile. And the killer satellite can wait at the orbital trajectory. The small-size satellites can use kinetic energy penetrators. 

Image 4:) Delta IV Medium lifts off. 

Or they can impact their targets like the NASAs Dart probe made to an asteroid.  Also, the positioning and recon satellites can equip with counter-strike systems. Those systems can look like the Israeli "Trophy" system. The counter-strike system itself can be a machine gun that uses "Gyrojet" ammunition. 

Gyrojet is a small rocket. And if that system uses a similar ignition system with the metal storm it denies recoil. In that kind of space machine gun, the back of the weapon is open. And that eliminates the recoil that causes problems for satellites. Maybe Gyrojet was not successful in the Vietnam jungle but the same concept can use in space weapons. 

The idea is that satellites can destroy incoming missiles by using that weapon. But these kinds of systems are also effective against other satellites. 

And the thing is this: weapon race will go to space. GPS satellites, along with spaceborne recon and communication systems, play vital roles in conflicts. So those satellites are a very good target for anti-satellite systems. 

https://www.boeing.com/defense/autonomous-systems/x37b/index.page

https://www.space.com/virgin-orbit-plan-aid-nato-europe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASM-135_ASAT

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyrojet

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trophy_(countermeasure)

Image 1:) https://www.space.com/virgin-orbit-plan-aid-nato-europe

Image 2:) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASM-135_ASAT

Image 3:) https://www.boeing.com/defense/autonomous-systems/x37b/index.page

Image 3B:) https://techstory.in/virgin-galactic-secures-faa-approval-to-commercialize-space-tourism/

Image 4:) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_IV

https://onlyimaginationlimitsinnovation.blogspot.com/

Dark energy: when stars shine is too bright.

 

The description of dark energy is simple. There is too much energy in the universe. 

Sometimes some researchers say that stars are shining too brightly. And that thing means there is some kind of unknown external or internal source for mysterious dark energy. Or actually, dark energy is no mystery at all. Its wave motion which source is unknown.  But what is the source of that mysterious wave motion? 

There is a couple of explanations for dark energy. 

1) Dark energy could be the wave motion that is coming outside the universe. That means there should be some energy sources that make this thing possible. So that thing (almost) proves the existence of the multiverse. 

2) Dark energy could be the quantum soundwaves coming from the quarks and gluons. The strong nuclear force is the interaction between quarks and gluons. And when gluon travels between quarks it causes a similar effect to the hammer that hits metal balls. 

In this model, there are two different types of dark energy. 

A) Gluons are sending short-wave dark energy

B) Quarks can be the source of long-wave dark energy. 

So dark energy can be radiation that comes from the gluons and quarks. And if we are thinking about the wavelengths of that radiation the shorter wavelength that comes from the gluons can be the hot dark energy. And the radiation that comes from the quarks is cold dark energy with a longer wavelength. 

3) There is an unknown source of dark energy. And that source could be graviton or some more exotic particle than we ever modeled before. Graviton is the source of gravitational waves if that particle existed. So if the graviton exists the place of that, still hypothetical particle is (almost certainly) between the gluon and quark. 

If graviton exists that could be extremely short living. If graviton is like the quantum spark that turns to wave motion immediately. That thing explains many things. That explains why we cannot observe gravitons. In that model, graviton turns wave motion immediately when it releases from its position. 

So that means graviton could be the chameleon particle. That we are looking for. In that model, the graviton is in all particles that have mass. But when graviton is released, it turns to wave motion. 

When graviton collapses it could pull another hypothetical tachyon particle into our universe.  

Or there is the possibility that when graviton collapse. That thing pulls the hypothetical tachyon particle from another dimension to our universe. As I many times wrote before, the dimension is energy level. In the same way, we can think that speed is also energy level. 

Tachyons are hypothetical  "faster than light" particles. But otherwise thinking we might say that tachyons are particles whose energy level is too high that we cannot observe them. So that means those tachyons are a little bit less exotic than we expected. 

Dark energy simply means that there is too much energy in the universe. 

What is dark energy? The answer for that is dark energy is wave motion that rips the universe into pieces. So description for dark energy can be that there is too much energy in the universe. And that means dark energy is wave motion whose source is unknown. 

One thing in dark energy is simple. It exists. Or the force that rips the universe into pieces exists. And that thing is one of the biggest questions in astronomy. What causes this strange wave motion that rips the universe into pieces? 

Dark energy shows that the standard model of physics is incomplete. The reason for that is that we cannot make a complete model of the system without complete information about that system. If some part of the system is missing the observation cannot match with theoretical models. 

The thing that makes dark energy interesting is that in quantum systems is one rule. Any system itself cannot create energy. It just can transform the form of the energy. So all extra energy that comes to the system must come outside of the system. Or if there are no other systems there must be an unknown component in the system that is the source of that energy.

https://astronomyandtechnology.blogspot.com/

Why are things like the JWST telescope along with Artemis and Dart spacecraft advancing the economy and civil and military technology?

Above: Dart mission. 

The growing economy requires innovation and trust. 

The price of the JWST and Artemis is very high. But the fact is that they are advancing economical advantage. Those kinds of high-profile projects are a good introduction to the know-how of the actors that are working with them. This thing will bring companies to offer their ideas and discuss with NASA and its cooperatives about advancing space technology in civil and military areas. 

When we are thinking about the price of the moon program. We always forget that the moon program gave many sidelines like velcros. And the experience of heavy-duty systems. But it also opened the path to developing lightweight computers and later artificial intelligence. So the projects like Artemis and JWST are offering the framework where new products can develop. 

Things like Mars-rovers are also offering the tool how to test independently operating vehicles and the artificial intelligence software that can turn into everyday life. Innovation is the key element in those missions. 

The new technology can be dangerous in the wrong hands. 

NASA's Dart mission also offers the possibility to create and develop a new type of artificial intelligence-based technology that allows one to search for the right asteroid and shoot the penetrators to it. But the same technology that is used in Dart can use for creating killer satellites that can destroy at least military satellites. 

The problem with killer satellites is that space is, of course, a demilitarized area. But things like GPS satellites, recon satellites that point to the targets, and satellites that are supporting military forces in some other ways are military targets. The military role of the satellite makes it a legal military target. 

So the killer satellites are satellites that might seem harmless to people on Earth. But modern technology is changing that situation. Those satellites can drop armed quadcopters from the orbiter. 

Those quadcopters can be satellite-controlled and armed with pistols or larger weapons. Those systems are more realistic than some "rail guns". They are simply capsules that are dropped through the atmosphere and release those drones. 

Image: https://therobustframe.in/dart-mission-by-nasa-to-stop-an-asteroid/

https://webelieveinabrightfuture.blogspot.com/

There is a new era for space exploration.

The next attempt to launch Artemis 1 mission is maybe on Friday.  The fact is that the new era of spaceflight is rising. New heavy-duty cargo systems like Artemis and Space-X's Starship are making history. 

They allow creating the new type of missions where large structures can assemble at the Earth and moon orbiters. The miniature shuttles can use as assistant systems that are putting the parts of the large-size structures in the right places. 

But why the Moon is an important thing for the next-generation space missions?

The space station that is on the moon's surface offers a good place to test the technology that is needed on Mars and farther. But another thing is that the Moon is needed for interplanetary flights for one reason. Interplanetary flights are based the nuclear-powered spacecraft. The nuclear reactor that is used in those missions is dangerous because radioactive material from those reactors can fall to Earth. 

Sending a nuclear reactor to the Moon's orbiter requires heavy cargo systems. The highly radioactive material that is needed as fuel in those reactors can launch to the moon's surface in multiple different launches. That minimizes the possibility that the nuclear material can leak to large areas in nature. 

Nuclear fuel can be stored in hard capsules and shot together with other parts of the Moon's orbiter. When only a minimum mass of fission material is shot in each launch, it minimizes the possibility of a large-scale nuclear disaster. 

The nuclear-powered rockets' parts can be put together at the Moon orbiter and the reactor can start behind the Moon. That denies radioactive debris to fall on Earth. 

The moon's orbiter is also in a very good position for larger space telescopes than James Webb. The service crews can use the Moon's surface for the storage of mirrors and other systems. The service for those large-scale and extremely expensive instruments can also make by using robot teams. The remote-control robots can change the mirrors of those telescopes that can be even larger than JWST. 

Image: https://scitechdaily.com/sunrise-for-the-moon-dawn-of-a-new-era-in-space-exploration/

https://webelieveinabrightfuture.blogspot.com/

After 45 years, the 5 billion years legacy of Voyager probes just began.

The most successful space mission in history, Voyager left our solar system. Those two probes are outside heliopause. The most out position of our solar system. Heliopause means the point where ions flow from the Sun mixes with ions that are coming from other stars. That spacecraft gave multiple wonderful images to the researcher. It found many strange things. And the last thing that this spacecraft found was the cosmic hum. NASA plans to keep in contact or analyze the data that those probes sent for as long as possible. 

The lifespan of those probes will extend by shutting down the systems. And somewhere in the 2030s, all systems of those probes end their operations. But long before that the helium storage of the gas rockets ends and two-way communication between probes and Earth turns impossible or meaningless. The information sent from Earth includes orders to change the posture of the probe. 

And another thing is how to use the instruments. So when Voyager probes left from Heliopause there is no need to use things like cameras or change their position. If the tracks of the probes change that tells that there is some gravitational object that changes it. Or there is the possibility that some energy impact like cosmic eruption hits to probe. But the fact is that only outside effects can change that trajectory. 

The computers of those probes are the masterpiece of programming. Credit cards have more memory than those primitive computers. But they are an example of how effective code can make that kind of system able to do its jobs. 

Image 2) "The two Voyager spacecraft took different paths through the solar system, and both have since left the sun’s influence entirely". (Astonomy.com/Voyager: What’s next for NASA's interstellar probes?)

NASA/JPL-Caltech

Image 3) "The Voyager golden record (left) is a 12-inch gold-plated copper disc. It’s covered with aluminum and electroplated with an ultra-pure sample of uranium-238". (Astonomy.com/Voyager: What’s next for NASA's interstellar probes?)

NASA

Image 4) "Only the Voyager probes have passed the heliopause, leaving the sun’s influence. New probes may one day study the interstellar medium lying beyond". (Astonomy.com/Voyager: What’s next for NASA's interstellar probes?)

NASA-JPL/Caltech

The antenna of those probes turned to Earth. And it can transmit data to the largest telescopes on Earth. Conditions outside Heiosphere are stable. And there is almost nothing that can turn the position of that antenna. So because Voyagers turned their antenna to Earth they can stay in that position forever. Or until some impact with micrometeorite or another outside force effect the position of those probes. 

Those two probes show that being near the observable planet gives more details than telescopes. In 40000 years Voyager 1 could reach another star. But that star is red dwarf. 

The distance between the Earth and the center of our galaxy is 26 000 light years. And Voyager traveled only 18 light hours. So that is a good example of distances in the universe. 

After millions of years, those probes will reach some yellow star. Maybe there is a planet orbiting that star. And maybe the famous golden plates can be analyzed by some researchers on that planet. 

There is a small possibility that someday in the distant future our descendants will be those researchers. Maybe some interstellar craft reaches that probe. And then those researchers find evidence of the ancient civilization that once sent that spacecraft. The position of the Sun is changed. 

And maybe the data of the Voyager is buried deep in the computer archives. Or maybe, the data of the famous gold plates of the probe. That sent billions of years ago is lost. While Voyager travels outside our solar system it's the gravitational center. And that means it pulls the microscopic particles to it. When those impacts continue for billions of years they can cause damage to those gold plates. 

But the fact is that Voyagers themselves can be the thing that helps those hypothetical researchers to find the origin of those probes. The elementary and isotope fingerprint in the material of the Voyager probes is unique. There is the possibility that the researchers are using advanced spectroscopy to analyze the materials of the Voyager spacecraft. And then they are starting to find a solar system with similar chemical and isotopic compound that is found in the body of those probes. The question will we ever see them again? 

https://astronomy.com/news/2020/04/voyager-whats-next-for-nasas-interstellar-probes

https://phys.org/news/2022-08-years-billion-year-legacy-voyager-interstellar.html

https://scitechdaily.com/nasas-longest-lived-mission-voyager-probes-log-45-years-in-space/

Image:1) https://scitechdaily.com/nasas-longest-lived-mission-voyager-probes-log-45-years-in-space/

Images 2-4:) https://astronomy.com/news/2020/04/voyager-whats-next-for-nasas-interstellar-probes

https://informationnevervanishes.blogspot.com/

There is a new explanation for the strange gamma-rays. That comes from the center of the Milky Way.

The offer for an explanation of that gamma-ray radiation is microsecond pulsars. The problem with that explanation is that the regular pulsars are not sending gamma-rays. They are sending radio waves and the question is how the radio waves and electrons are turning gamma-rays. The fact is that if there is some kind of radio source in the center of the galaxy.  

Radiation comes from that source that travels through the entire galaxy. And in that journey, the outcoming radiation hits that radio wave of electrons. So during that journey radiation that comes from the other particles is increasing the energy level of that radiation.  So the radiation that comes from the pulsars will face a similar effect to lasers. When radiation hits electrons it increases their energy level.

Radiation makes the same thing as protons and neutrons. When the energy level outside the particle decreases. Those particles are sent wave movement until their energy level is the same as the area around them. 

The microsecond pulsars are possible in areas with extremely high energy levels. Normally pulsars are neutron stars that are part of binary stars. Or they are surrounded by interplanetary nebula. The thing that causes the rotation and the radiation pike of the pulsar is material that impacts a neutron star. 

When a pulsar is near the center of the galaxy. It's in an area where the radiation level is extremely high. That energy level increases also the energy level of the radiation that comes out from the neutron star. When that radiation hits particles of high-energy clouds they are storing that wave movement and energy in their quantum field. 

When that radiation travels through that particle energy level around it will decrease. And that thing causes the particle sends its radiation in the form of wave movement. The same thing happens in neutron bombs. When the radiation of the nuclear explosion hits to neutron cloud. Those neutrons are releasing their extra energy in the form of neutron radiation. 

The energy level of the area near the center of the galaxy is extremely high energy. In the galaxy's center is a black hole that sends radiation around it. When the X-rays from that black hole impact a pulsar or neutron star. That increases their energy level. 

Or otherwise, radiation from the pulsars hits the material disk around the black hole. The material around the black hole is at a high energy level. When electrons impact the material around the black hole. They are sending radiation that might have a gamma-ray frequency. 

https://scitechdaily.com/strange-galactic-signal-coming-from-the-center-of-the-galaxy-has-potential-new-explanation/

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

Researchers plan to send a probe to Mars by using a powerful laser system.

The lasers are allowing to send spacecraft to orbiter without pollution. That thing makes them a very powerful tools. In the most futuristic plans, the extremely powerful nuclear-powered lasers can send the spacecraft even to other solar systems. And the same lasers that send spacecraft to orbiters and other planets can use as ASAT (Anti Satellite-systems). Those lasers could destroy satellites from the orbiter. 

There is planned to use giant laser systems for lifting satellites to the orbiter of the Earth. And also those lasers could use to send probes to outer solar systems. The problem with those giant lasers is that the systems are heating the spacecraft. That heat effect can minimize by cooling the satellite as cold as possible. The use of lasers for sending spacecraft to orbiters is not new.

In those systems, the laser ray makes hot air under the craft. And that effect lifts the craft from the ground. In some other plans, the laser ray that is inside the craft would use to vaporize liquid hydrogen. That thing can use to thrust spacecraft. The lasers can also use for vaporizing the metals that are driven to particle accelerators. Those particle accelerators can be used as ion motors. 

Graphene-based high-power particle accelerators can be used as ion engines. 

Image 1:) "(a) Schematics of the experiment. By irradiating a large-area suspended graphene target (LSG)with the ultra-intense J-KAREN laser, energetic ions are generated. (b) and (c) show the Raman spectrum and microscope image of graphene, respectively. (d) and (e) show the schematic drawing of stack detector using solid-state path trackers and Thomson parabola spectrometer (TPS), respectively. (g) and (f) show the typical data from TPS and stack, respectively. Credit: 2022 Y. Kuramitsu et al. Robustness of large-area suspended graphene under interaction with intense laser. Scientific Reports" (ScitechDaily/Graphene and an Intense Laser Open the Door to Extreme Energetic Ion Acceleration

As lasers, the ion cannons can use to push the craft upward. The craft can be equipped with the opposite polar electric load than the ion flow. That allows to rise it to the orbiter. 

The graphene and lasers are making it possible to create intense powerful ion accelerators. Those systems can use as an engine in spacecraft. The ion engines are particle accelerators. The graphene-ion accelerator can use for creating thrust for spacecraft. The thing is that the high-energy accelerators can also use as space weapons for the killer satellites whose primary objective is to destroy enemy satellites. The killer satellites can also deliver ions to the atmosphere for disturbing enemy communication. 

https://futurism.com/the-byte/mars-giant-laser-earth

https://scitechdaily.com/graphene-and-an-intense-laser-open-the-door-to-extreme-energetic-ion-acceleration/

Image:) https://scitechdaily.com/graphene-and-an-intense-laser-open-the-door-to-extreme-energetic-ion-acceleration/

Super-powerful slingshot would take rockets to the orbiter.

One start-up company tests an interesting method for launching satellites to the orbiter. That method is just to use the extremely powerful slingshot that accelerates the rocket to the orbiter. Without the need to use rocket engines. If that thing is successful. It would solve one of the biggest problems of rocketry. That thing is noise. 

If the use of rocket engines can replace by using the magnetic track or slingshot that thing would make spaceports more common than they are now. The slingshot or spin shot is the model that this company uses. There is a video of this system above this text. The system uses a centrifugal launcher. 

Another way would be to use the high-altitude airship. The original launching system cannot use because it's too heavy. But the High-altitude airship or HAA. Can take the small rocket to an altitude of 20-30 kilometers. And that thing makes it possible to launch the small rockets to higher altitudes than the ground-based system allows. 

If the system uses a long whip it can take the rocket higher. The whip is giving more launching energy to the small rocket. And then the computer-controlled hook would release the rocket. The whip would be at the side of the airship and then it would just throw the capsule to orbit. A small rocket or satellite can launch by using the whip. And then it can simply throw that rocket to a higher altitude.

 Or the whip can rotate a couple of times, and that thing would give power to the rocket. This kind of slingshot launcher can also interest military operators. They can use to shoot grenades to long distances. And if the system uses an open structure that thing can be very highly mobile. If those high-tech slingshots replace cannons.  That makes it possible to use all kinds of grenades in the same system. And no flame can uncover the position of the firing station. So this is one of the reasons why this kind of system is under development. 

https://futurism.com/startup-tests-rocket-launched-by-super-powerful-slingshot

https://interestandinnovation.blogspot.com/

Could a hypothetical quark star be invisible?

There is the possibility that there are so-called "stealth stars" in the universe

The hypothetical quark star is one of the "should be" objects. But there is no single observation of that type of star. Theoretically, quark stars are the medium between neutron stars and black holes. But why we cannot see that thing? 

Could the reflection that comes from free quarks have a wavelength that we cannot observe? The free quarks will send the radiation that has so short wavelength that we cannot observe that radiation because we have no object that resonates with that thing.

What if radiation comes straight from the surface of quarks? Normally the radiation comes from the quantum fields of atoms or protons and neutrons. But if there are free quarks somewhere in the universe, those quarks would send radiation that has so short wavelength that we cannot see that thing. So does that thing explain, why we have no observations about the hypothetical quark stars? Are those objects sending wavelength that is invisible to us?

Could dark energy mean the radiation that comes straight from the surface of quarks? If naked quarks are sending the radiation. That radiation has a wavelength that is shorter than any other radiation. Normally quarks are in the protons and neutrons. And those objects are sending radiation from their quantum fields. 

But there is the case where the quarks might be free. That case is the quark star. There is the possibility that the quark stars are invisible to us because in those cases the quarks are sending radiation in the wavelength that is the size of quarks. 

The thing that might cause the forming of a stealth star is the case, where the reflection is coming back in the form of a wavelength that is impossible to see. So maybe so-called quark stars have small bubbles of quarks on their surface that make them invisible to the eye.

In that case, the reflection happens with a wavelength that is coming from the frequency of quarks. When radiation hits the quarks they are sending echo as the wavelength that is the same. As the size of those subatomic particles. In normal cases, quarks are in the protons and neutrons. And we can see things like neutron stars. 

The reflection from the neutron stars is coming as the wavelength that is the same as the size of neutrons. But in quark star the quarks are naked. They are without the quantum field and give the reflection as the pure quarks. In a neutron star, the radiation reflection comes from quantum fields that surround neutrons. So if naked quarks are giving reflection or sending radiation that means the wavelength of that radiation would be far shorter than radiation that comes from neutrons. 

The question of planet 9 is causing an interesting theorem. Could that mysterious object that causes the strange gravitational effect to the trajectory of planet Neptune be the fermion or rather saying quark star. 

There is the possibility that the quark stars are invisible because the quarks are sending radiation reflection in a wavelength that is impossible to notice. There is the possibility that quark stars are not smooth. In some theories, the quarks are making the small hills or small bubbles in the surface of the quark stars. And that thing means that the reflection from that surface is coming from an extremely short wavelength. 

There is the possibility that there are so-called "stealth stars" in the universe. In some ideas, extremely heavy objects can surround by the whirl of electrons. Which are pushing photons away from the surface. In some other visions, the halo that is caused by reflecting radiation around quark stars can eliminate the reflection. In that case, the star reflects 100% of radiation in the same direction where that incoming wave movement is coming. 

And in this case, the counter radiation of the object will delete the incoming radiation. So in this idea, the object acts like an active jammer system that denies the echo of the radiation. When the incoming and reflecting radiation with the same wavelengths hit together they are neutralizing each other. 

https://physicsworld.com/a/calculations-point-to-massive-quark-stars/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark_star

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strange_star

Image:https://physicsworld.com/a/calculations-point-to-massive-quark-stars/

V-2 rocket is one of the what-if products in the world

Image I: The V-2 rocket

Nazi Germany's V-2 rocket was a fiasco. The original name for V-2 was A-4 (Aggregate 4). In appendix 2 is the list of "aggregate" rockets of Peenemünde.  But the nazi propaganda changed the official name of that weapon to the V-2, which means Vertungswaffe 2 or revenge weapon 2. But the A-4 is only the top of the German rocket weapon programs. There was almost so way lethal rocket weapon under development that A-4 was. 

The name of that weapon was A-5, and it was planned to launch from the Heinkel III bomber against the ships and other similar targets. The A-5was the first air-launched missile that used liquid fuel. And if that weapon could cross the speed of sound and hit ships it could be more lethal than any "Fritz-X" glide bomb. 

The A-5 was the aerodynamic test unit for the A-4 or V-2 missile. But it could use as an anti-ship missile. Luckily nobody thought that thing in those days. The idea for the hypersonic missile is "stolen" at least partially from A-5. 

 V-2 was too complicated for the product in the circumstances of the war. The problem with the V-2 rocket was that it was one of the most advanced weapons in the world. When those "revenge weapons" hit London they gave no warning. The lucky thing was that those terror weapons produced so little number that they could cause the change of the war. But still, the question is on the air. What if nazis would produce a large number of those weapons in peacetime? What if the war did not begin in 1939. What if Hitler would wait until the weapon was ready. 

A-5 under HE-111 bomber

And what if the bureaucracy didn't slow down the V-weapon program? That thing is a mystery. But the fact is that the V-2 rocket caused many questions after WWII. And one is that what if the mad man who lead the nazi government would wait until the engineers could solve technical problems of the V-2 rocket program? And the number of those weapons was higher than it was? What if their production would be more successful than in wartime? 

Image III: FX-1400 "Fritz-X" 

Could the same thing happen after WWII with some other device?

When we are thinking the quantum computers and other kinds of kinds of systems the code is free. Almost everybody can search for data from the internet. And if that person has qualified engineers and other specialists in service that thing can make nasty surprises. The thing is that the V-2 (A-4)and A-3 programs were the creepy visions that the geniuses can make if they are serving the evil. The open data is making many surprises for the environment in both civil and military sectors. 

(1) https://www.v2rocket.com/start/chapters/peene/peenemuende.html

(2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aggregat

(3) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_X

Image I:https://v2rockethistory.com/how-rockets-fly/

Image II:http://www.v2rocket.com/start/chapters/peene/a5-on-he111.jpg

Image III:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_X

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

The giant accelerator would allow interstellar traveling

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The power source for interstellar traveling is the major problem in those futuristic spacecraft. If we are thinking about Warp-drive, what can travel faster than light, we must realize, that we would need the brand new technology, in the very giant scale. The spacecraft that would travel faster than light must be base the technology, what is ever created in the real life, and making this technology really is the very complicated process. The shape of the spacecraft would be like some science fiction spacecraft, what uses antimatter or WARP-propulsion for increasing the speed of 80-90 percent of the speed of light.


And in this spacecraft would be particle accelerator, what could be like the linear version of "Hedron", what is located in CERN. That accelerator would be like some extreme long tube at the nose of the spacecraft, what might be quite similar, what is planned to use in "Project Thor". The difference would be that the device is equipped with antimatter-motors, what will accelerate it for speed, what is near the speed of light, and then the accelerator would be launched. But the size of this spacecraft would be much bigger, what is planned for "Thor".


The interstellar spacecraft would first accelerate the top speed, what could be something like 90 percent of the speed of light, and the particle accelerator would shoot the capsule to the top speed. The problem of this hypothetical spacecraft would be the size of this thing. The accelerator must be over hundreds of kilometers long, and the electricity, what is used in this gigantic rail gun is very high. This spacecraft would be built in the space, and it would be very huge. If it sometimes would be made.


So there must be the very powerful power source, that this very huge spacecraft would be worked. And after the spacecraft have been shot by the railgun there is no return back. The capsule would fly to Alpha Centaur in about two years, but the problem is the slowing. And of course, the home trip would be difficult. In one scenario this spacecraft would use sophisticated artificial intelligence, and it would have sub-robots, what would build another accelerator at the orbiter of the target star.


This kind of artificial intelligence could also make the copy of the spacecraft if that is damaged. This technology is called "Von Neumann technology". In this case, those robots would search suitable materials from asteroids, what is orbiting the star by using laser-spectrometers. Then the materials would be transferred to the factory, and then those systems can create microchips and other stuff, what is needed for new spacecraft. This kind of systems can help us to colonize the entire galaxy in the distant future, but there are many technical problems to win before the trip to stars would be real.

Fermi paradox: Where is everybody? (Where are other civilizations?)

https://marxjatalous.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

If we would calculate the number of known planets, what are on the habitable zone of the sun type star we would get number one if we would live in 1950's And if we would see how many known civilizations were in that kind of planets in that time, we can get number one. So if we would calculate the probability to meet intelligent civilization on the Earth-type planet, what is in the habitable zone of the star, we could find number 100. So in every earth type planet, what orbits the star in the habitable zone should have an intelligent life form.


And here we must ask again where are those civilizations? When we are looking at the Drake equation, we must think about the question, where are the aliens, if every earth-type planet in the habitable zone of stars would have intelligent life. Here we must go to the Fermi paradox, the attempt to explain why there would be no answer from another civilization? The one thing in this paradox is, that when the civilization would get some special level of science and technology, they could destroy themselves with nuclear weapons.


This explanation is one of the most well-known things about this paradox. And then somebody would ask, "Was the Second World War the ultimate test", and if the mankind passed that test, would it become super civilization? The other thing in the Fermi paradox is that the gamma-ray bursts would destroy the civilization, and the opponent would claim, that if the civilization would have enough high technical level, they could evacuate to the dark side of their home planet.


And also moving to the dark side or underground network of tunnels, would that civilization survive even from the biggest cosmic catastrophes. When we are thinking about the communication between civilizations, there is, of course, the possibility that the hypothetical alien would not answer, because it would not feel the communication safe. That means it afraid that some other hostile aliens would locate it, and then the war between worlds would raise.


Sometimes some persons think, that maybe the afraid of conflict between two very technical civilizations would survive the Earth. Because if some civilization would use weapons like Death Star, it would show the power to other civilizations, what have the even better equipment and technology. Sometimes I have faced the theory, that other civilizations would leave us alone because we would be too pathetic being seriously taken.


That kind of talking is very usual between philosophers. Or maybe the radio signals, what are left to the universe are too weak to notice. Maybe the radio waves, what are coming from other stars and galaxies are acting like ECM-jammer system. That radio-transmission can cover the radio-waves, what is sending by using Hydrogen Alpha-frequency. Maybe we are alone maybe not. But the searching would continue.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_paradox

The thoughts about the Apollo program, and its three men crews.

Saturn-V rocket
(https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/saturnv-3_0.jpg)

https://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are many explanations for why NASA returned to the Moon, and why they send three-man crews on that journey? The most common explanation for staying out from Moon is of course that the costs of that project would be so huge, and that explanation is the most acceptable of those stories. But if I would stop writing here, I must give you the very short text, and that's why I must start to write something, what is not proven in anywhere. Only thing what is interesting is, that NASA sends three-men crews to the Moon, and that would make social problems in the spacecraft because only two of those crews could land to the Moon. But everything else is pure fiction, or I hope so.


One of those explanations is that the military is testing some kind of weapons at the Moon, and that would be the reason, why the humans did not go in there since 1973. At above this text is a picture of the Saturn V-rocket. In some theories, there would be the nuclear missiles dug under the dust of the moon, and they could be inside some kind of tubes. Those missiles would cause horrified surprise if they would be used against the target on Earth. And some stories tell that this study project had code name "Project Luna". The weapon base would be fully automatized and remote controlled.

 But there are some other things, what makes that leaving out of the Moon very interesting thing.  In some other stories the moonwalk and other things in that project, what was called as "Apollo" served the top-secret or semi-secret project called "Ozma". In this attempt to make the relationship between the civilizations were send the message to some stars, that humans are here. And when the astronauts were sent to Moon, the investigators of NASA tried to recognize if the footprints on the Moon would somehow be changed.


 And they send Apollo to the Moon for making two missions one is public and the second was somehow childish attempt to uncover the secret moon base of aliens, and until yet the NASA would not be given answers from humanoids. and there is no evidence about the connection with the "Project Ozma". There is one remarkable detail in the Apollo program, and that is why NASA used three men crews, and only two of them would land to the Moon. This is the only fact what is shown true in the stories, why humans did not send back to Moon.


Three persons in the small space cause always anger and other problems with social relations. and maybe NASA tested the anger management process of the most qualified military personnel, but if we are thinking carefully the three men crew would cause that the astronauts were unable to make observations because of they afraid fights or anger, and did NASA that election for the strength of the crew because they had something to hide.

https://read.bi/2uyP3Lj

The moon-shuttle and space station

David A Hardy's painting
"Eros expedition"
(Picture I)

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/the-moon-shuttle-and-space-station.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

We are all read about plans to make the moon shuttle and that plan is very interesting. The moon shuttle would be the spacecraft, what would not land to the Earth, and the use of that spacecraft would be like, the crew and other things would transfer to the normal shuttle at the Earth orbital, and then the moon shuttle would be refueled. The shape of this shuttle would be the simple tube, what can be made by using the rocket stage of Delta or Atlas rockets. That stage would be equipped with feet, what are similar to the rockets that are made by David Hardy in the painting above the text. The name of the painting is "Eros expedition", and it portraits the fictional journey to the asteroid Eros, but the similar spaceship can operate from the Moon and travel to Asteroid belt.

An aerodynamic cone, what would protect the docking unit would be removed at the orbital. Or it can be made for turning away from the head of this spacecraft. The technology, what might be used in this enhanced lunar vehicle is basically similar, what have used in the Apollo-program. The big size allows a big cargo bay and this spacecraft would be also used as the space station for the astronauts. In distant future, this kind of spacecraft can also be equipped with ion motors and small nuclear reactor, what allows it to maneuver in large areas in the asteroid belt and investigate the asteroids. And sometimes I have imagined, that it would be equipped with the high power electric generator, what allows to produce the electromagnetic field over this spacecraft, what would protect the crew against cosmic radiation.


If we think the most conventional model of this planned spacecraft, what would use liquid hydrogen and oxygen as a fuel, we must notice that  the biggest difference of this vehicle for Apollo-craft is, that it could fly between Moon and the Earth many times, and if the operator will want, this spacecraft would be land to the Earth without the parachute. The main motor would impose the thrust, that the speed of falling thru the atmosphere would be safe. And if we are honest, the similar technology can be used to send that tube-looking spacecraft to the orbital. The answer for keeping the speed low enough will be in the computerized ventilation system, what imposes the flow of oxygen and fuel all the time during the flight, that the nose of the rocket would not rise too high.


The secret of rockets is they need the mass of fuel to fly to the orbiter, but the rocket must create enough exhaust gasses, that the pressure of those gasses would be bigger than the weight of the rocket. The motor ventilation allows imposing the pushing force of the rocket, that the non-aerodynamic shape would be possible. But the aerodynamic cone can make that way, it has the hinge, what turns it away when the spacecraft is out of the atmosphere.

Picture I

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/61/49/45/614945d6efb3c534338229d76c881bf1--universe-art-alien-art.jpg

What if we would combine the HULC-exoskeleton and space suit

Picture I

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/what-if-we-would-combine-hulc.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This writing is pure fiction. I took the idea for it from the movie "Predator", and this solution would be pure science fiction. The space suit is very suitable for deep-sea scuba diving, and also the use of this equipment in high-level radioactive areas feels a good idea, but there is one problem with that suit. The weight of the space suit is enormous, and the weight of this system causes, that it is useless in this kind of missions. But with one special equipment, this thing can revolutionize the handling of nuclear disaster and diving technologies. This equipment is HULC-style exoskeleton, what allows the capacity to use the space suit in the surface of Earth. The exoskeleton would give extremely big power to the person, who uses that machine. The space suit is suitable also in deep-sea missions because the suit is very hard. Actually, the space suit is a man-shaped spacecraft.


And in theory, the team, what uses this equipment can be dropped from the spacecraft to operational area, and the space suit is hard enough to resist the pressure of the deepest sea. Those persons can carry the heat shield, what looked like shields, what the knights used, and they can return to the atmosphere. Then the parachutes would be open, and those persons could start their operation in the deep sea or in the radioactive area. Those systems are very expensive, but they can be allowed to operate in the areas, what is too hostile for normal rescue or operative team.


The space suits can allow getting the things from the sunken ships, what are very deep.  The connecting that very heavy thing with HULC-system, could the operator also work in the places like the nuclear disaster. The space suit can allow that the man can handle the uranium fuel without risk of getting radiation illness, but this would make very bad visions in my sight. Space suits are equipped with the thing, what is called the "micrometeorite protection". That means that this suit could be used as the armor suit, what would resist all kind of threats. The suit can be equipped with RTG-generator and lasers. The laser would be in the back of the operator, and the laser rays can be transferred to the arms by using light cables. And the RTG would give enough power to that system. The exoskeleton would give enough force, that one person could carry this kind of equipment.


When we are thinking, that the space suit would be used as some kind of "predator" mission, that thing can also be equipped with the nuclear detonator. The nuclear detonator could be modified RTG-generator, where would be connected with another bite of plutonium. Power of that device would be extremely low, what means about 0,5-2 kilotons. The military might be interested in this kind of devices because they would cover the identity of the operator if this person would be injured. The space suit allows avoiding the DNA markings of the operator, and it will be very hard, and maybe in some laboratories are tested, how suitable this thing would be in some kind of missions. But the high price of that system would limit its use to the space missions. This thing could be very good equipment in some science fiction book, and in the real life, the space suit can be too expensive in the everyday use.

https://www.army-technology.com/projects/human-universal-load-carrier-hulc/

Picture I

https://www.draper.com/sites/default/files/news/spacesuit.jpg