Showing posts with label arguments. Show all posts
Showing posts with label arguments. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 5, 2021

The quantum computer can be more than the sum of its parts (Part II)



The physical parts of a quantum computer are really important. But the purpose of quantum computers or any other computer is not just being. They are made for something that benefits their producers. The purpose of the data handling system is to handle data. So the computers are the entirety, which contains the physical system, operating system, and the commercial or productive application. 

This is the thing that we must realize when we are making the data system. Without an operating system and working, applications is impossible to prove the full-scale power of the data handling system. Quantum computers are still at a primitive level.  And their power will rise when they would turn more common. But they are proven their superior in data handling and extremely heavy and complicated calculations. 

But without the operating systems and the systems that are handling inputted data even, the best computers are a piece of plastic, silicone, and metal. When we are saying that the computer is the triangle of the operating system, hardware, and application. We must realize that also simple things like outputting the data in the form that the user will understand it. If the data cannot display after computing. There is no mean for making computers. 

Even if we want to make the most powerful computers in the world, there must be some motive behind those machines. Without a very good argument motive, there is no financial support for that kind of program. Even the best and the most powerful technological systems are without purpose. Without good arguments, the systems are not made because they are leaving without financial support. 

The best argument for increasing the scale of quantum computing is data security. The quantum systems can make the most secure network in the world. But the question is how to demonstrate the effect of the system? The thing is that quantum systems can break any code that is made by using binary computers. 

But otherwise thinking quantum computers can use also for making codes that are unbreakable for binary computers. That means quantum computers can deny the hacking where is used binary computers. But the binary systems are vulnerable to the attack that is made by using quantum computers. 

The purpose of quantum computers is to make data-handling processes easy. The reason why the new computers are needed must mention because of motives for making new and powerful computing systems. Motive is the key element for making new things. And the argument for quantum computers is that this technology is that these kinds of systems are increasing the security of the data handling network. 

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/



Sunday, April 15, 2018

What actually is ancient Greece in philosophy?

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/what.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Many times in philosophy have mentioned some persons from ancient Greece. That place and time were full of philosophers, who created many thoughts about things, like idealistic republic and atomic models, but people almost ever asked one simple questions about those philosophers. They ever ask "why those texts are made in long time ago"? In philosophy, the key thing is not proof anything like in some empiric investigations. And what means or what is the role of ancient Greece or philosophers of ancient Greece in that profession. Another question goes like this: what is the difference between the philosophical and historical Greece?


The element of philosophy is to use rhetorical argumentation, what makes those texts or speeches feeling right. And the problem of philosophy is that philosophers are professional thinkers, who sometimes say something, what is not pleased the persons who keep the force in their hands. And that's why is more comfortable to say that some ancient philosopher said those things before some Voltaire said those things in some place because in those cases Mr. Voltaire would be escorted in the cellar of that castle, and then the brutal extortion began.


In the time of Voltaire, there was one golden rule in making writings. The kings or other noblemen should not embarrassed, and the best way to embarrass those people was show that they were wrong. Kings were perfect people, what means the thing, that they could ever be wrong in many cases. But when we are going to meet the modern philosopher's relationship with some man, named Socrates or Plato, we must say that none of the modern philosophers could ever meet those persons from ancient Greece. And in the real life, we can't go and ask anything from Plato or Socrates.


Maybe in some day in tomorrow we could build a time machine, and then we could go to meet those great men from Greece, but before that, we can only use our imagination, why those philosophers claimed to say something, what might be the reason, that those philosophers have made so much claiming. Other philosophers have put their own texts to their name, and we can't go to ask those Greeks that what they really have said or written in some garden in ancient Greece at the beginning of history.

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/what.html

What was before the Big Bang (Part II)

 What was before the Big Bang. (Part II) "Our universe could be the mirror image of an antimatter universe extending backwards in time....