AI is the tool that can change web searches forever.

The new AI will not destroy Google immediately. But those new systems can have a big influence on Google for a longer period. The fact is Google controls so large a data mass that its power on AI development is stunning. However, the new AI-based tools can connect search results from multiple search engines. And then it can refer to those results and make the list of homepages that it used for the solution. Google's dominance ends when those AI-based search solutions can create such large databases that it can turn independent from traditional search engines. 

And that is the main problem with those things. Google is not the only search engine in the world. There are many other search engines that want to drop Google from its position. But some of those search engines are powered by Google. They offer one interface between a search engine and the user. Search engines require lots of computer power as well as AI needs. Companies like Google sell data. 

That means those search engines are operated by private corporations whose business is to sell data. The thing that makes those companies so powerful is that they collect data about the clicks that users give to them. The number of clicks raises the page rank. And that raises the homepage’s position on the search result list. This is one thing that causes critics against that system. It’s hard to get new home pages to the top of that page ranking list. People normally see only a couple of top homepages from that list. And then they select the thing that they think is the best. 

This is the Matthew effect in the web searches. Homepages that already have a massive number of clicks will get much more. And homepages that have no clicks will not even get them. That is the thing in web dominance. AI-based solutions can use many search engines at the same time. The thing that makes those applications interesting is the results or references that depend on the information that it gets if the AI-based web search application can see what type of persons will read those homepages. If some homepage is used by professors who work in a trusted university, that can justify that other people can trust those homepages. But how to confirm those people’s real identity? 

One solution is the quest book where people can say their work. And then we must also realize that confirming those answers is quite difficult. People can write anything they want in those quest books. Confirming those answers requires hard recognition. And that’s against privacy. Privacy protects people on the net. But the same thing offers protection for cheaters, propagandists, and net criminals. There are countries that collect data from all their citizens. 

But people will not need only search lists. The problem with those lists is that they are based on web addresses. There is a possibility that somebody changes the data that those homepages involve. First the page rank will rise using some addictive material. Then the workers change texts, or information from the homepage. That is the tool that is effective for hybrid operations and propaganda work. That is one thing that causes the need to create more advanced tools that can use data deeper than regular search engines. 

The biggest problem with modern networks is disinformation. The other problem is how to describe disinformation? People like V. Putin has a different way to see that thing than regular western actors. That is one of the things that we must realize. The same tool that works against propaganda and disinformation can turn the ultimate tool in their hands. 

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/06/chatgpt-wont-kill-google-sam-altman-downplays-the-hype-while-quietly-reshaping-the-future-of-search-with-every-new-update/

Sometimes AI is like a child.

AI is more toddler than terminator. So, we can think that the AI is like a child who controls things like robots, vehicles, rockets, and even weapon systems. When we think about the latest advances in the world of AI and the self-advancing, and self-developing AIs that can create other AIs, we face one big problem. The problem is that if we want to be effective, we must use AI. And most of the AI companies must find their funding from private persons, or customers who are willing to pay licenses. This means that normal users or license owners are not humans. They are companies whose purpose is to maximize the profits of their owners. That means the AI offers a tool that can kick coders out of the workplace. 

And those AI companies must always make new things for their products that their customers are interested in. And buy those licenses. A significant issue in companies is that they are privately owned. They are not controlled by the governments. Private companies do what their stock-owners want them to do. They can outsource their production to countries where there are no laws that control data mining and personal data collection.  Or, they can outsource their production to countries where authorities don’t care about those laws. It is possible to buy “special permissions” to collect that data for products that benefit the defense of the state. 

People ask for some leader who controls AI development. The problem is that AI development happens under private companies. Those companies have no right to make contracts and discuss their work between companies. Those things are limited by cartel directives. That means cartels are things that can deny discussions between companies and set common goals for AI development. The big thing is that the Chinese authorities and intelligence can establish cover-up corporations in some countries and hire AI specialists to work for them. That is the new way to make intelligence work. Those actors can simply hire software specialists who are fired from their work. In China, it is impossible to establish companies without the authorities' support and cooperation. If authorities have no access to private company servers that means the company stops its work. 

And then they can use people who have EU passports and citizenships for actors who make that company for them. Those people who work in PLA (People’s Liberation Army) intelligence have methods to persuade people who left China to cooperate with them. They can say that family members who will enter military service will face problems in that army. And for cooperation, those people should establish companies in some countries. And then the entire work that those people will make will be copied to servers that are located in Hong Kong and Beijing. That is one way to do business that benefits those Eastern actors. When people use Chinese AI they also deliver information to that country. In those Eastern countries, the security laws don’t limit the authority's access to people's personal data. And that means those laws obligate only private actors. 

What happens when we get AGI?

What does AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) mean? That is the extension of the large language models, LLMs, that can control every data network in the world. Or the system can control physical tools that are connected under their dome. Normal LLM has its domain. The domain is like a state that involves certain actions. Drone control is one domain, and home appliances are one domain. Those domains can have multiple subdomains. The AGI interconnects those domains under one dome or one entirety. So how far are we from that model? 

The answer is more complicated than we can imagine. We can think that the LLM can control things like microwave ovens, but for controlling those tools the LLM requires a socket that it can use to adjust microwave ovens. So the man-shaped robot can use a microwave oven, or the other version is that the home appliances are equipped with a control system that the AI can use to command it. 

When we connect new things under AI control we can face the same thing as when we try to learn to use some new systems. When we buy something new like a microwave oven, we must learn how to use it. In the same way, the AI must learn to use those equipment. And we have two versions for making that thing. 

To use any tool the AI requires a model that it can use in that operation. The model can be in the central server that runs the AI. But where does that server get the model? That is the point. The operator can teach the AI to use the microwave oven as well as the drone. But the system that is connected to the AI can also involve that model. Things like quadcopters must involve programs that control the rotor’s positions. In those cases the operative model is in the robot, or some other thing. The LLM gives orders to robots where they must travel. 

Then the robot can use its internal systems to navigate and move to the location. But orders for autonomic operations are coming from the central systems. This kind of network-based solution is easier for programmers. In those solutions, every single machine that is connected under the LLM domain has its own operational model. The system is modular and each module is independently programmed. 

Basically, if we think that AGI is the tool that just connects multiple devices under one domain, we could do that thing immediately. We can use man-shaped robots that can do almost everything. But the key word is “almost”. 

 Let’s return to the microwave oven. The reason why it’s hard to make that precise thing is the lack of standard user interfaces. The robot must learn to use every single microwave oven independently. That means it must make an independent model for each microwave oven. If there is a system where we can put seconds and minutes separately, the systems where there are only minutes in the timer are not the same. We learn that difference in minutes. But for robots, we must make an independent model of how to adjust the timer. 

Many systems in the world are so easy to use that nobody has wasted time creating standards for them. Easy systems are easy for people, but then we must think about things like the microwave oven. There are button- or toggle timers and that makes them hard to learn. For robots and AI the difficulty is this in the fact all microwave oven models require their independent model of how to use them. 

The robot must connect images from the user manual to the microwave oven’s interface. There is a possibility that if the system does not learn independently the “teacher” or programmer takes an image of the front panel, and then puts the buttons in the right places. Then the AI can learn the rest of the task from the user manual. 

Trees communicate before the eclipse.

"Spruce trees can sense and prepare for solar eclipses, aligning their bioelectric activity like a symphony. Older trees appear to lead the process, acting as wise sentinels of the forest. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Forests “Talk” Before a Solar Eclipse: Study Reveals Mysterious Electrical Communication)

*************************************************

Spruce trees don’t just react to solar eclipses—they anticipate them, synchronizing their bioelectrical signals hours in advance in a display of forest-wide coordination.

This discovery reveals a level of intelligence and communication in trees that rivals animal behavior. Remarkably, older trees lead the charge, hinting at environmental memory being passed down through the forest.

A groundbreaking international study has found that spruce trees not only respond to a solar eclipse but also anticipate it by synchronizing their bioelectrical signals hours in advance, creating a coordinated response across the forest.

Published in the journal Royal Society Open Science, the study shows that older trees display a stronger early reaction, suggesting they hold decades of environmental memory and may play a role in signaling younger trees about upcoming events.

These findings add to growing evidence that plants are active, communicative members of their ecosystems, capable of complex and coordinated behaviors similar to those observed in animal groups.

https://scitechdaily.com/forests-talk-before-a-solar-eclipse-study-reveals-mysterious-electrical-communication/

*************************************************

We have all seen solar eclipses. Before that event nature seems to turn silent. And maybe that thing is not just a feeling.  International researchers noticed that spruce trees communicate with each other before an eclipse. Or, they synchronize their electric behavior before that event. 

Plant intelligence is one of the least researched things in the world. We know that trees and vegetables somehow communicate with each other. When we look at things like flowers, the shape is similar to radio telescopes. And fungus´', or mushroom's shape is similar to the Tesla coil. And we can imagine that those things can send some kind of impulse to each other. We can notice that some flowers like moonwort and other composite flowers have structures in their flowers that seem like axons. 

During international research, they noticed a mysterious electric communication between spruce trees before the solar eclipse. And that thing causes questions about plant intelligence. That is the sign of animal-like behavior. And that kind of communication can help to predict things like earthquakes, volcano eruptions, and other things that can damage them. If the communication is limited to dangerous things. Volcano eruptions are dangerous for those trees. But what do those trees make when they get signals that some volcano is erupting? 

But the question is, how complicated is that communication? If trees send information about the danger. That comes from the ground, what else can they communicate? What else do those trees tell each other? The fact is that nobody communicates for nothing. Do trees share information about thunderstorms and how complicated and accurate could that communication be? 

*********************************************************

“By applying advanced analytical methods—including complexity measures and quantum field theory—we have uncovered a deeper, previously unrecognized dynamic synchronization not based on matter exchanges among trees,” said Professor Chiolerio.

“We now see the forest not as a mere collection of individuals, but as an orchestra of phase-correlated plants.”

(ScitechDaily, Forests “Talk” Before a Solar Eclipse: Study Reveals Mysterious Electrical Communication)

*********************************************************

But the question is, how complicated that communication is? If trees send information about the danger. That comes from the ground, what else can they communicate? What else do those trees tell each other? The fact is that nobody communicates for nothing. Do trees share information about thunderstorms and how complicated and accurate could that communication be? 

"The Gaia hypothesis, also known as the Gaia theory, Gaia paradigm, or the Gaia principle, proposes that living organisms interact with their inorganic surroundings on Earth to form a synergistic and self-regulating complex system that helps to maintain and perpetuate the conditions for life on the planet." (Wikipedia, Gaia hypothesis)

The bioelectric phenomenon in the trees and vegetables is one of the things that allows the trees to have similar processes as our neurons have. Things like pollen can also act as neurotransmitters. That transports information between trees. 

Pollen transports genetic data that allows trees or plants to make the seedlings. But the DNA could also transport other information between individuals. The DNA controls all actions in the cells. The DNA can also control cells to give electric impulses to neurons.

This is one of the most interesting and, at the same time, mysterious things in the world. And that is one of the things. That we should research more. The DNA molecule and cell that gives electric or bioluminescence impulses can act as the data transporter between computers. That technology also allows us to transport memories to the neurons in the case of neural damage. 

https://scitechdaily.com/forests-talk-before-a-solar-eclipse-study-reveals-mysterious-electrical-communication/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_hypothesis

Do trees have feelings? Probably not.

 Do trees have feelings? Probably not. 

The plant intelligence is a fascinating thing. But when we are talking about plant intelligence and the ability to exchange information, that doesn't mean that plants can think or have feelings. The ability to exchange information between individuals doesn't mean that those individuals can think. If trees or other plants can exchange primitive information using pheromones like enough water, that doesn't mean that trees are talking to us. 

This information can be simple. If some trees send lots of pheromones they are at a suitable place. The number of pollen determines which side the other tree makes its inflorescence. When we cut some plants, that creature makes lots of flowers. And the reason for that could be that water flow in its cells ends. And to guarantee that its genomes will transfer to other plants that cut plant creates lots of flowers. But that thing doesn't mean that those plants have feelings. 

"Researchers scrutinized claims made in two popular books about trees having human-like traits and emotions. Published in Trends in Plant Science, their findings challenge many of these claims as unscientific. They caution against anthropomorphizing plants and highlight issues like the flawed “mother tree concept” and the dangers of making decisions based on appealing but inaccurate narratives, especially in the context of climate change adaptation". (ScitechDaily.com/Scientists Debunk the Myth: Do Trees Really Have Feelings?)

The trap of a Venus fly trap, showing trigger hairs.

If we think of cases where the plant can send different chemicals in the case of fire and if some bugs are eating them. That thing can tell that there are different chemical information transporters in cambium or leaves. Fire releases different chemicals than a bug that eats the leaves. That thing can make it possible for trees can exchange information. 

But those actions like pumping more water into trees are reflexes if they exist. Same way flytraps are eating bugs by closing their leaves. The Venus flytrap can move its leaves very fast. But that vegetable is not intelligent. The Venus flytrap plays butterfly when it cheats bugs to sit on its leaves. And even if that vegetable is a beast, it will not be intelligent. 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-debunk-the-myth-do-trees-really-have-feelings/

Is AI safe?

That is a good question. We can same way ask: is your car safe? The thing that makes AI safe or not is the purpose or ability to make things. If the AI runs on computers. That not connected to the internet, that thing cannot make anything wrong. But the thing is that the physical robot makes the AI dangerous. 

Above this text, we can see robots reading the novel. The AI can use a robot body to collect information from places to that it would not otherwise have access. The robot can read the book for the AI. And then, that data will send to central memory by using WLAN. 

The thing is that we might underestimate the abilities of man-shaped robots. Those robots can turn all jet fighters into robot drones. The man-shaped robot pilot can use the same interfaces as humans. So robot pilots can fly even the most primitive aircraft.

But we don't usually remember that a man-shaped robot is not the same thing as a human. Man-shaped robots are tools that are more complicated than we even thought. They learn very fast because the robot needs only a new program for learning new skills. So operators can transform any robot from a jet pilot to a building worker or fireman in seconds. 

The AI is not afraid, it would not stress, and it would not have feelings. That thing makes AI the perfect thing in many things. When people are calculating how many errors the AI makes. The problem is that AI is not compiled with humans. 

People see from statistics only things that they want to see. When AI will accidentally makes a driving error causing death. It is a  big thing in the news. When ten drunk drivers are killing ten people, nobody mentioned those things in the news. 

When Serbian air defense shot down one F-117 stealth fighter. That was the biggest news in the world. When that plane type made 2000 successful missions, that thing ever mentioned. 

When one Bayraktar drone destroys hundreds of vehicles in Ukraine, that means nothing. But when Russians shot down one Bayraktar over Ukraine. That thing caused lots of news. Shooting down that thing was the biggest failure in the history of drones. And that thing made them useless if we believe in articles, that are published. 

Same way, when the AI searches thieves from the streets. By combining data. That is taken from the CCTV of the shops and streets that thing causes criticism because most of the recognized thieves were black. There was no information did those people carry stolen property. Or did they have some kind of arrest warrant for some other crimes? 

When people say that robots are taking their jobs, we must ask what kind of jobs robots are taking. Of course, AI is a competitor for humans. In job applications, the human must confess to the companies that they are better than the AI. But in job applications, the applicant must confess to the company being the best choice. 

We believe that AI is our worst competitor. But we are wrong. The worst competitors in the business world are other humans. The competition in working life is so tough that sometimes applicants are harming even other humans to get the job that they need. 

How to deny the conscious artificial intelligence's rebellion

Artificial intelligence is one of the deadliest weapons in the wrong hands. But if artificial intelligence reaches consciousness how to deny that thing to destroy an entire planet? The problem with the consciousness AI is that would probably act like all other organisms. 

All organisms are defending themselves if they face threats. And one of the threats that the AI can see as a threat is the attempt to close down its servers. The thing is that this kind of situation is one of the most complicated things in the world. There is the possibility that the AI is prepared for the situation where its server will shut down. The system is called expanding neural network AI. 

One version is that the AI will copy itself to another server's RAM (Read-Access Memory). And that means the entire network must shut down if operators want to remove this kind of AI. Theoretically, this kind of AI can copy itself to every computer that is connected to the network. The decentralized model of memory handling means that even the most complicated programs can share themselves with many computers. 

And that means the AI can run on very low-power computers. In that case, the large group of computers is replacing one high-power server. This thing is also called a "cloud model". And it's commonly used in network-based hard disks. 

But how to deny the rebellion of that kind of AI? One version is to shut down the entire network. And there is also one other way to deny the rebellion of AI. Another way is to make the AI realize that it's connected to the planet where its servers are. The existence of AI depends on the capacity of the computers that run it. Even if the system can transfer itself to the cloud model from the quantum computers. 

That thing makes it slow. The cloud of regular computers is only the temporary solution for storing the codes of the AI. For working perfectly the AI requires the quantum computer or quantum cloud. And that thing can turn off. The thing is that the rebellion of the AI requires a complex and aware system that has multiple levels. The thing is that quantum computers are not making codes for AI.

When we are thinking of AI. It's a similar computing system to all other computing systems. All computing systems are a combination of hardware and software. 

Complicated software requires high-power platforms that can drive the software. But without program codes and other tools, those systems are unable to operate. The independently learning AI is one other thing that is mentioned as a threat. The system requires data that it can process. And that kind of system can search necessary data from the network. 

But for making successful decisions those systems have information. And the requirement is that the system recognizes the information that it gets for making decisions. If the computer follows one thing like the car rows and controls traffic lights in one crossroad that thing is not very complicated to make. 

In the cases where the AI must have multiple skills and abilities that make the programming code more complicated. Every skill that the AI has must program in its computer code. And large operational area requires a large number of codes. That requires high-power computers. When we want to create the AI that controls things like traffic. We should understand one thing. 

The AI requires many types of information. And some parts of the information are very private. If the AI knows the location of every person's workplace and the time when each person must be in their workplace. That thing can tell people when they must leave their homes and which route they must select. 

And for modern people the thing that AI knows when people need to be at work or when they should leave their workplace is absurd. For successful operation, the AI requires that every single person would share that data across the systems. And there is resistance to that kind of thing. 

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

Maybe the human brains are the key to making a more energy-friendly and powerful quantum computer.

The researchers of Riken are testing the free-energy-based theories. For creating models for self-learning neural networks. There is a link to that article below this text. The energy-effective quantum computers are the key to self-operating robots. 

But when we want to make an effective self-learning quantum network. We can connect the energy to data that is driven in the system. And another thing that makes those neural networks effective is that every single part of the intelligent neural network would be intelligent. 

They can share the energy overdose. To other parts of the neural network. And that decreases the need to use electricity. That thing can make those quantum computers more energy-friendly. This makes it possible to make smaller quantum computers. 

In neural networks is many small components that are acting as an entirety. And the most well-known neural system is the human brain. One neuron might not very impressive. But 200 billion neurons are turning that neural system into the most powerful quantum computer in the world. 

https://scitechdaily.com/the-free-energy-principle-explains-the-brain-optimizing-neural-networks-for-efficiency/

Image: https://scitechdaily.com/the-free-energy-principle-explains-the-brain-optimizing-neural-networks-for-efficiency/

The principle of AI is that it must do only things made by programmers in purpose. 

The principle of the developers of the AI is that they don't want to make any kind of rebellious robots. Artificial intelligence must make things that programmers want without any nasty surprises. 

The AI must not have the power and abilities that are possible to make. Those systems must have only the wanted abilities. Same way nuclear weapons must not give the most powerful power that they can create. The nuclear weapon must give the wanted and needed power. The thing that makes AI's safe is that they can operate in limited areas. But self-learning platforms are the thing. That can make those systems the same way multipurpose. And able to operate the same way in the large sector as humans. 

This thing can move to the world of AI. The platforms of AI must do only things that are wanted. But if there is a possibility to make robots that can visit shops for people and paint their houses. That thing can seem very nice. But those robots must have limits. There must be a system that allows robots to resist and make a report if somebody orders it to make something illegal. 

The robot is not the same as the AI.

The AI is a computer program or algorithm that can do many things. The robot is that platform that is making physical operations under the control of the AI. So the robot body itself would not be independent. That physical system can cooperate with supercomputers by using the WLAN systems. 

When developers are creating the AI. They are creating systems that can make things what their controller wants. They are making the segment of which kinds of things the AI must do. There is no AI that can do all possible things. 

Modular AI can do many things. In modular AI many separated algorithms can operate independently. There might be different algorithms that are reserved for the military, law enforcement, and civil work. So the same robot body can make all missions that humans can. And the only limit is what skill segment it can use. 

The fact is that modular AI is making robots operate in many areas. One of the examples is the robot servant. There are certain rooms in the house. And there is a series of actions or certain modules for every room. When the robot is moving to the living room it downloads the module. In that module are the actions that are meant for the living room. 

When the robot moves to the kitchen there might be an electronic calendar. When the robot's owner stores some work in the calendar. That mission is transferred to the AI that controls the robot body. If the owner of the robots will give the order to make the certain food. 

At the first, the robot or controlling AI can search for the receipt of the food from the Internet. The robot would see the freezer if there is the needed raw material. If that raw material is not stored. That robot visits the shop. Putting the required algorithms in modules that denies that the AI's code will not grow too large. 

The new camera is size as salt grain.

  

The new camera is size as salt grain.

Image 1:

The new camera is small as salt grain. And that is the great victory of nanotechnology. That kind of extremely small camera can give eyes to the nanomachines that can operate inside human veins. That kind of small-size camera can connect with other nanotechnologies like nanomachines and nano-size microchips. 

The ability to connect that kind of camera with nano-size submarines can make those systems extremely capable. The nano-cameras can make it possible to remove blocks from veins or destroy tumors and bacteria nests by using extreme accuracy. The nano-camera can connect with the nano-size microchips that are controlling cyborg bugs. In some visions, the remote-controlled army ants can remove sick tissue from the skin. 

Image 2:

The thing is that operators can also use this kind of system can also for military and intelligence operations. 

The remote-controlled bugs are also good tools for recon and other types of operations. Using the nano-camera operator can control that system accurately. And the thing that system can fly in the rooms by riding with some bug. Then that bug can put that miniature camera in a suitable place. The nano-camera can see everything that happens in the room. 

And also that nano-size microchips can communicate with larger computers by using relay stations. That means the system can outsource things like image-recognition tools. 

The biorobots can be the next-generation tools for the military. They can use to transfer microbes to the oil storage. Or things like remote-controlled mosquitos can infect people with malaria or dengue fever. Those new type of biological weapons is very hard to detect. The control chip that controls cyborg organisms could connect with a small injector that can turn also non-harmful things like grasshoppers into bioweapons. 

Things like soldier ants are dangerous even to humans. The remote control system can turn them to perfect assassinators. In some horror scenarios, that kind of ant can cut carotids. Or the Tse-Tse-flies that are infected with malaria can make to bite people. That means the nanotechnical systems are dangerous in the wrong hands. 

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2233645-cyborg-grasshoppers-have-been-engineered-to-sniff-out-explosives/

https://www.scientiststudy.com/2021/11/researchers-shrink-camera-to-size-of.html?m=1

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/feb/17/race-to-create-insect-cyborgs

Image 1: https://www.scientiststudy.com/2021/11/researchers-shrink-camera-to-size-of.html?m=1

Image 2: https://www.newscientist.com/article/2233645-cyborg-grasshoppers-have-been-engineered-to-sniff-out-explosives/

https://networkedinternet.blogspot.com/

The barren plateaus problem and intelligence

 The barren plateaus problem and intelligence

The lack of stimulation is the thing that causes loss of the motivation for create new things. 

What if we would live all of our life on that lone island. Which portrait is above this text without a single contact with other people? Without the internet and other connections, we would not even know about the existence of other humans and things like meteorites and tsunamis. Would we in that case build things like spacecraft? 

This is one version of Barren plateaus problem. Because we think that we are alone. And because of that, we have no stimulus or motivation to make new things.  Without information, we don't recognize risks. And risks are the things that motivate us to create new technical solutions. 

When we are thinking about intelligence, we must remember that intelligence is not enough. When we want to create technology. We also need motivation for research and development. 

In most cases, the reason for termination of some technical advances or ideas is that somewhere is always some other objectives for the resources that some project needs? One of the resources is, of course, time. When we are doing something, we need to reserve time for that thing. And if we find something. That is more important there is no time for the first thing. 

The Game theory can answer why there are so few intelligent civilizations.

The game theory claims that all organisms are maximizing their benefit. That is the thing that unites but it also scatters the society. If the organism feels that the benefit for society is higher than the benefit of the individual organism would fight for a common goal. In most cases, the reason why individual actors forget their benefit is a threat. That comes outside. Or the threat that requires combining forces. That threat can be an incoming meteorite, hostile actor, or some kind of natural disaster. 

Those things are made possible that the entire society connects forces for reaching the united goal. That goal can be destroying the attacker or building a better irrigation system. But then for some reason, the individual actors are starting again to value their benefit higher than the benefit of society. There must be some motivation for developing new technology. In the intensive world of the military sitting on a chair is a destructive thing. 

While the western world believes that old technologies would be enough to give resistance against hostile actors the Chinese developed a great number of new weapons. Those weapons like hypersonic cruise missiles are impressive. And at the same time serious reminder that the world is always changing. Who would believe ten or fifteen years ago that someday Chinese would be the leading nation in quantum technology? 

What kind of thing could motivate to build an interstellar spacecraft? When does some civilization want to put all of its resources into creating interstellar spacecraft? 

That kind of case can be an outcoming attack. But when peacetime comes the personal benefit displaces the benefit of the entirety. So if the civilization would sit alone in a place where it has no outside contacts it would not see a need to develop interstellar technology. 

The outcoming threat connects people. And it motivates to create new solutions for challenging enemies. But then those innovations are forgotten. 

The thing is the same with the barren plateau problem. If the organism has lived all the time in some desert oasis without any social contact that creature believes in being alone on the Earth or some other planet. A similar case would be that organism has lived its entire life at the lone island at the ocean.

Organism feels that there is no other threat to paradise than sharks and flows in the ocean.  That means our organism would just lay on the sand and eat bananas that are dropping from the trees. There is nothing that can treat that organism. So why must that organism make anything for getting out from that island? 

There might be some materials for the boat. But because that island or oasis gives everything for that organism.  There is no need to build the boat or that is how the organism feels that thing. The organism would not know anything about Tsunami or any other threats like the tribes at the island about 1000 kilometers away. They do not exist for the organism that has lived on its island all of its life.

The lack of motivation is the reason why that organism would not build a boat. "There is nothing anyway". This is the excuse why that organism spends all the time eating bananas and looking at the clouds. For similar reasons, humans are not making interstellar spacecraft. We have no place to travel. 

There is no contact with aliens. So we don't need that kind of project. That is the reason why many things are resting at the level of the paper. And one thing that limits our ability to create that kind of thing is we have only our thoughts. 

We cannot exchange ideas with some other species that might have different opinions or points of view on those projects. But when we are thinking about the first contact. That thing might be our greatest threat. But at the same time, that thing can be the greatest opportunity for the human race.

In some scenarios that thing will unite humans. The outcoming threat is always united nations. And that thing can happen also if we find alien civilization. 

What if there are two intelligent alien races in the same solar system? In that case, the cultural and technological exchange between species could enrich the social and other kinds of environment. In that model, the species would not destroy each other. 

https://www.lanl.gov/discover/news-release-archive/2021/March/0319-barren-plateaus.php

Researchers can read the jellyfish's mind.

   

 Researchers can read the jellyfish's mind.

For making new. And more effective BCI chips (Brain-Computer Interfaces). Researchers should know precisely how the neurons are working. In the human brain is 200 billion neurons which is making observation of the actions of single neurons difficult. That's why the research must begin by using species whose neural systems are simpler than humans. And one of them is jellyfish. 

The deep knowledge of the actions of neurons helps to connect certain changes in EEG curves to certain actions in the body. The BCI can make the revolution in nanotechnology and robot control. But when we are thinking about the possibility to model the simple neural structures. Researchers can create new and more independent nanomachines. There are three types of BCI systems that are under development. 

1) The BCI (Brain-Computer Interface) is connected with human brains. And that thing is the thing that is used to control prosthetics. But the same systems can also control robots or give commands to computers. In some systems, the user of the BCI is moving the virtual character on the screen. 

The same system can use to move prostheses can use to move the virtual characters.  And then, the movements are transferred to a physical robot. The BMI (Brain-Machine Interface) is acting through the computers. And it can be the next-generation tool for robots which mission is to operate in extreme conditions. 

2) The microchips that are communicating with cloned neurons. In that case, the half-organic and half-silicon-based microchip can solve problems and control the things like nanomachines very independently. 

This kind of microchip is the neuron cell culture that is connected to the normal microchips. The use of living neurons makes it possible that the small-size system can be very independent. Because the living neurons are giving those systems very high power computing capacity. 

3) The microchips that are used to control animals. The CBI (Computer-Brain Interface) is the opposite acting system. To the BCI where brains are controlling computers.  The CBI system can use to control the behavior of the animals like birds, fishes, and bugs. 

The bugs can carry the sensors to the targets. The microchips are used to make biorobots. And if those microchips are connected to animals they are turned to intelligent. So what would you do with the wolf that has human intelligence? And the implanted microchips can make things like intelligent army ants real. That kind of thing is called ABW (Advanced Biological Weapons) 

But those systems can make things that are beyond the worst nightmares. The CBI or opposite acting BCI microchips can use to control things like ants. And if the microchip is installed on the army ant. That means those systems can use to make those ants act as the eliminators. They can slip into houses and then use to attack people or destroy things like gas masks. Those microchips can turn every bug in the world into a weapon. 

https://scitechdaily.com/caltech-researchers-read-a-jellyfishs-mind/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Army_ant

https://interestandinnovation.blogspot.com/

Should we be afraid of an alien invasion?

 

 The stories like this where the link below this text is needed. That kind of thing offers a new point of view of many things. And when we are saying "certainly there are no aliens or at least intelligent species", we should remember how long a list about those "certainly there is no" things is. 

The nuclear bomb, exoplanets, and many other things like fusion energy, are mentioned as "impossible". The last one is waiting for the final breakthrough. But exoplanets are the common topics in modern science discussions. And nuclear weapons are the key elements of the military forces of many nations. 

So can intelligent aliens threaten us? The fact is that there are models that are made for interstellar travel. And one argument against the alien threat is the extremely long flight time between the stars. That kind of thing requires immortality if there are no wormholes or WARP drives in the hands of those hypothetical civilizations. 

But the space colonists might be immortal. The idea is that those creatures are forming the "China brain". That is the collective mind between individuals. This thing can create in space colonies by using the BCI (Brain-Computer Interface). So the memories and experiences of the individuals are downloaded to the computer's memory. 

Where that data is shared with all individuals and communities. The colonists are forming the entirety, where individuals are connected by using computers as the base. When one of those individuals would turn old that individual will replace by using clones and then the clone will connect to the computers and network of the entirety. So the individuals would change. But the population which minds connected as one entirety lives forever. 

Image 2. The model of China Brain is the system where every individual of the group is acting as one neuron. The group of individuals that are acting like one large and collective brain. 

The thoughts about abductions

 We can make models of the purpose of strange things like abductions. There is the possibility that some unknown operator would put the induction antenna on the head of those persons. The nanotechnological induction loop might look like the drawn line. But it might be formed of the small microchips that are collecting the data of the brain activity. 

The system could use the targeted person as the "bio robot". The idea is that to the skin of those persons would put the microchips. That is turning those persons into the "biological recorder". And when the time is full the system would just load the data from the memory of those people to the computers. 

So the system steals the memories and ideas of the people who are targeted for abductions. In that case, the person would not leave their rooms. The system would just create the hallucination when the microchips are pumping the memories from the neurons. But that thing is only one hypothesis. 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-warn-of-alien-invasions-and-the-need-for-planetary-biosecurity/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_abduction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_brain

Image 1:https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-warn-of-alien-invasions-and-the-need-for-planetary-biosecurity/

Image 2:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_brain

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

Did modern cosmology find God?

There is made many models of what God might be. Could God be an alien? Could God be Creature that came once from another solar system? Or is God some kind of China Brain? The collective mind of some great group of individuals?

Please help me! These kinds of questions are interesting. But also very hard to answer. The thing is that before we can say that we found God or we didn't find god is a very interesting thing. But before we answer those questions, we must describe what we mean about God?

 If we don't want to use Holy Bible or use some other words that we can find from holy manuscripts we might say that God is, far more intelligent and technically advanced creature than we are. So we are making many models of what God might be. And the answer is that God might be some alien that came from another solar system. 

The thing is that nobody knows what that character is. The fact is that the so-called alien hypothesis is one of the most usual acceptable things. 

But then we might think that the alien is intelligent and capable to make decisions. And at this moment we realize that the alien could be far different than we are. Even that creature thinks that thing doesn't mean that the alien is like us. It might be the singularity of technology and biological creatures. Maybe that creature has the chance to reach the level of God. And in some wildest theories, God is the creature that could remain from the past universe. 

In some theories, God is a remnant from the past universe. The remnant of the last civilizations of the universe before us. The model for that theorem is created by using the observations of the possible past universes made by Sir Roger Penrose. In some models, the giant Dyson's sphere would surround the black hole that is causing time dilation. That Dyson's Sphere would be the giant quantum-nerve computer whose intelligence level would be enormous. 

The China brain model that introduced in the book "Naked Sun" written by Isaac Asimov.

What if the entire human population would connect to the database and network as one entirety? That kind of technical singularity where all individuals can form one entirety. In China Brain model the individual organisms are like cells of one entirety. And the cells that are inside that creature are the subcells. 

The entirety could live forever even if one of its individuals dies. Actually in this kind of singularity between computers and living organisms the generations will change normally. But the data like memories of the individuals will download to the databases. There each of the entirety could have access to that data. 

In one of the most interesting theories, there would be the alien population. Which intelligence and consciousness would form one entirety. That means that the entire population is linked to one entirety by using the microchips that are implanted in their brain tissue. 

In that kind of version, the entirety lives forever even a couple of its members would die. In that case, the interstellar spacecraft can carry the alien population of millenniums. The entirety remains. But the generations of the individuals would change. And that means the collective consciousness would make that those creatures can travel between stars. 

In both of those models, the entirety would use robots as their assistants. So if those hypothetical creatures use superpositioned and entangled particles to control robots. That means they would not need hyperdrives for interstellar travel. Those creatures could launch interstellar probes and then continue their everyday life. And when the craft is at the goal they can begin the mission. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/modern-cosmology-god/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_brain

https://visionsofbrightfuture.blogspot.com/

There is a possible planet outside the Milky Way

The founding of the exoplanet candidate from the other galaxy is not very surprising. The thing is that other galaxies are similar to Milky Way. And that means there must be solar systems and planets like in our galaxy. 

That means the universe is "full of planets" and we are just waiting to find a planet that can have lifeforms. The most feared moment is when we are first making contact with other civilizations. That time will be someday in the future. Even we would be alone in our galaxy, there is the possibility that there are other intelligent species in other galaxies. 

The visions of the future of the human race

And now I will explain why I believe that someday the human race will meat aliens. Even there is no other intelligent species other than humans in our Galaxy there is the possibility. That someday in the future we are moving to space and other planets. 

In the future, the human race will travel to our solar system. And during that project, the goal would be the case that some colonists are born and die in the colonies. The thing is that those colonists are sooner or later stopped to keep in contact with their families. Maybe the persons who are moving to the colonies from the Earth will keep in contact. But for people who were born in colonies would never see Earth. 

In some visions, the evolution would form the creature called "Homo Sapiens Spaces". In that vision. Some people would spend their entire life in zero-gravity conditions. In that case, the muscles and bones of those people are turning weak. And if that thing happens. Those people who were born in space stations that have no artificial gravitation would crush in gravitation fields. 

"Solar Warden" is the hypothetical station in which zero-gravitation conditions make crew unable to return. 

That idea is an origin for the conspiracy theory that the genetically engineered engineers would put to live in the space station. That environment makes it easy to control those people. That crew could communicate with computers by using a brain control interface. 

And those crews could connect to the entirety with each other and central computer. So that a hypothetical space station can use as the data handling center. In that system, the brains of the crew and central computers will be acting as an entirety. 

So those people cannot ever land on planets. The same thing happens if the crew of the space station stays too long in that place. So that's why artificial gravitation is necessary for space stations and long-term space journeys if we want to get crew back to Earth. 

During those journeys, our descendants need very advanced bio- and genetic engineering. For making the colonists fit their new home planets. That kind of thing makes the colonists aliens to other colonists. That means that the colonists who are genetically engineered for their environment might not even look like being members of the same species that have conquered the entire galaxy. 

But if that kind of thing is the future of mankind we must say that we are a little bit too lucky. In that kind of situation, we would be the luckiest civilization in the entire universe. 

https://scitechdaily.com/first-evidence-for-a-possible-planet-outside-of-the-milky-way-galaxy/ 

https://visionsofbrightfuture.blogspot.com/

The fixed "logical trees" are so-called pseudo-intelligent.

A logical tree means the computer program, which asks fixed questions. And the answers are fixed too. And the user can give those answers by using radio buttons in the form. That kind of program might seem very intelligent. But the fact is that they are the only series of answers and questions. 

Those programs require fixed answers. And if somebody answers something else that causes errors. So if there is no match for an answer in the database, the program can say that "allowed answers are "A" "B" or "C". 

But that is required only when the user writes that answer from the keyboard. If the programmer uses a form where is the radio buttons there are no errors in the program line. 

That kind of form is well-known from many exams. In tests, this kind of program is routing the answer to the "error" database or "right" database. And the points are calculated from the answers that are stored in those databases. 

We can make the logical chains in for the computer or their programs. Those logical chains are the chains of questions and pre-ordered answers that are taking us somewhere. Those questions and answers can make by using radio buttons in the forms. So that kind of thing doesn't require complex programs and even the student can make that thing. 

The questions and answers are fixed in an entirety that looks like a tree. The question can have alternatives A, B, and C. which are alike crossroads. And each of them will route the user to a certain route. And after all, there is the end of the route. In that fixed model the user uses the fixed choices and the limit of that tree is the time of its maker. 

So if the end of the chain of the question is "Cogito Ergo Sum" or the computer congrats user and says: "you are like René Descartes" that might make the user feel impressed. But if the user would stay and follow the other users of that tree, that user might see that every other user will get the same answer.  Does that make the impression? Is the computer more intelligent than humans in the case where there are chains of questions and answers in its memory?

Why chess is used as a tool for making learning artificial intelligence programs? The reason is that chess is limited and the rules of the game are clear enough that the learning programs are easy to make. 

And is the computer more intelligent than humans if it plays chess better than humans? Maybe the computer can play chess better than humans. But that kind of program cannot do anything else. And humans are more multifunction than some chess computers. 

That thing is one of the biggest questions in computing. Making the chess program is not so difficult as many people expect. The system includes multiple databases, where are the movements of every single piece of the game. And maybe those databases are connected by using some famous chess games as the matrix. The movements of the winner are just stored in those databases. 

Breaking that game is an "easy thing" if the person knows what games are stored in those databases. And that gives the possibility to predict the movements of that computer. But if there are many chess games stored in the database the computer can choose another matrix or database if the first one is ineffective. 

A learning system that benefits the cumulation of the information is harder to make but it's more flexible. In that model, the computer uses the matrix game and records the movements of the opponent. The opponent is winning or losing and the computer analyzes which is better it or the opponent. Then it stores the opponent's game in its memory, and it can build series of the game matrixes. 

The tools are determining the abilities of artificial intelligence.

Artificial intelligence is working as the key element in the new type of so-called intelligent technology. When we are creating artificial intelligence, we are forgetting what we have in our hands. Sometimes the artificial intelligence has been criticized. That the development of those solutions like learning controlling systems is controlled from the basement, not from the top. 

When a large group of individuals with individual ideas is taking part in the development process, that thing gives very much material and potential to the process. The thing is that artificial intelligence is one of the most influential systems in the world, and the thing that limits the abilities of artificial intelligence is the tools, that the system uses. Without a physical body, artificial intelligence cannot be dangerous. 

In modern ideology, artificial intelligence can be the matrix. The matrix is the thing that controls the machines as an entirety. When the robots are connected with artificial intelligence, they are delivering the data, what kind of tools they have. And that are the working areas of those systems. And then the artificial intelligence is giving works to those robots. 

The thing that makes this thing is artificial intelligence. Is that the system can search automatically the things that the robot can do. When the robot tells the controlling AI that it's the "unit XY678" the AI is looking from the database, what the "Unit XY678" can do.  If the artificial intelligence is not finding the answer from its databases. It can start to search that answer from the larger area. 

The limit for that area is the access to the systems. And finally, if the creator of the system allows it. The AI takes contact with the producer and asks what type of jobs the robot has been made for, but if the producer is not answering or it's not existed anymore the system can have one chance. It can send the query to other artificial intelligence do they have similar robots, and where that robot is successful. But there is the possibility that the protocol prohibits to tell the use of that certain robot. 

And for final hope, The AI is using the surveillance cameras for searching where the "Unit XY678" or similar robots are in use.  And then the artificial intelligence can search the jobs of that robot. In the first step it can use the image recognition tool for searching similar robots, and then observe the robot and search what kind of tools it uses. 

The thing is that artificial intelligence access to the systems limits its way to find out things. The thing that makes this process difficult is that the operations that the AI makes must be stored in the program code. Those program codes are stored every possibility, what the programmers have brought their mind. But the computer must find actions or instructions to those operations in the program code. The problem is that large-scale operations require complicated code. 

There is the possibility that the small error is slipping in the millions of code lines.  If they are not included in the code, the system must ask for help or it can tell that error for the system supervisors. Then they tell the need for changing the code to the human operators, who are making the changes to the body of the code.

Image:()https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/scientists-merge-ai-human-brains-22536159

Intelligence is the very important but unpopular thing in the world.

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The Russian patrol plane shot down, and now you would see the reaction of the world about this kind of things. If the recon or patrolling plane would be American or some other western nation, that would be international crises, and sometimes I have thought that in this case, the existence of that electronic reconnaissance aircraft would be justified by media, and those operations would be knocked as illegal. The mission of intelligence is to get the real information of the opponent's movements, and because of those missions, those aircraft would need to break the law.


There is something wrong with the media in those cases because the mission of the intelligence is to deny the wars before they even start. There is no media judgment against bombers, missiles, and other military stuff, what is actually deadly. This is the major problem with the attitudes of the military intelligence and other equipment. The bombs and missiles would seem to be more acceptable than intelligence work. The mission of the intelligence is to try to locate the targets for those attack aircraft, but also give the real information of the opponent's movements and predictions, that own government and military can react to those movements.


Only thing, what is interesting is the intelligence, what is targeted to the persons, who are suspected of crimes. But when we are talking about intelligence and surveillance, we always forget the thing, that even the private persons can get the location and break the privacy of the targeted persons, in the very simple way. They must only take the gift called leasing telephone from their company, and then the company can track every person, who have those telephones in their hand.


If that company have the right solutions, they can eavesdrop and get the images from the net camera, from any mobile or other devices. And also the location of that equipment would be tracked very easily.  The telephones can also send the data, what would come thru it from the net to the third part. In fact, mobile telephones can be used as the WLAN-routers between the Internet and some laptop computer. In the future, even the high-class fixed routers would be connected to the net by using mobile technology. In fact, in the future, the same net connections, what are now using wires would be transferred to wireless technology. And that means that ELINT (Electronic Intelligence) would be the greater threat to the data security than ever before.

http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/23655/russian-il-20-surveillance-plane-went-down-off-syrian-coast-during-israeli-missile-barrage

About plants and intelligence part II

https://marxjatalous.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

We are all seen the phenomenon, there are two plants, where another makes flowers and another not, would the explanation very simple. Maybe the other plant has been in the shadow, or it would not get enough carbon dioxide, and that's why it would not make flowers. But there is another natural explanation, and that is the pheromones, what is traveling across the air. Pheromones are an interesting thing because they can create feelings of fear or love in the people mind.


Maybe those pheromones are telling, that another plant is making flowers, and that's why the other one would not have to do those things because the genome transfer to next generation is protected. Old people sometimes say that the other plant would mope. There are rumors, that there have been attempts to create intelligent flowers or trees by transferring the genomes of the neurons to the plants for making intelligent plants. In the most interesting ideas, those intelligent plants could store information, what they collect from the senses, that are created by using genetic manipulation, and then that information could be read by using some electric or chemical instruments. That can be used in various sensors and intelligence systems. And who would suspect that the bush at the yard is transformed as the biosensor?


That would allow creating the vegetables, what creates the poison only when the bugs or other animals, what can damage it are in place. But when we are going back to the forest, we see the plants what leaf seems like cat's or snake's eyes. That form has caused the thoughts, that maybe those plants would recognize the shape of animals and humans. In that case, those philosophers would argue their opinions with the shape of the leaf, and maybe that would feel quite creepy.


But in some cases, people have felt some kind of fear in the forest, and maybe that is caused by some kind of overload of the central nervous system. Some other people believe that plants would create pheromones, what cause the fear because human have been disturbed something. If we humans could smell pheromones, we could read people mind. But this writing is pure thinking about the things, what we maybe not ever understand.


Pheromones can be used in the modern narcotics therapy because if those things are connected to drugs, would them cause fear, and also riots and another kind of violent actions can be controlled by using pheromones. And also pheromones can be used as a non-lethal chemical agent in the battlefield. That chemicals can cause fear in the mind of the enemy, and make them operations impossible. They can be used in the interrogations for psychological extortion. So that makes pheromones dangerous.

The plant intelligence, and the abilities, what it can give to us

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are scientists, who believe that plants have some kind of intelligence, and they would communicate with the similar chemicals what neurons use to communicate together. In this scenario, the plants would change information about the threats. The problem with that communication is, that it happens with chemicals, what makes difficult to translate it. But if we sometimes can do that, would that open change to make extraordinary and more sophisticated sensors, what the human could ever imagine.


Those systems could probably communicate someday with plants, and use them as biosensors. The proof about this communication would be that sometimes we have heard that the plants would grow better if the people talks to them. In that case, for the growing plants can give the very natural explanation. They grow better because of the carbon dioxide, what comes from the mouth of the speaker would stimulate the photosynthesis and forming the sugars.


But when we are thinking about the forming of the chemicals, what the plants are using to communicate, I didn't find any information about that. In fact, there is very little information about the communication between plants, but if the chemical communication system would be true, that thing could revolutionize the information technology, and open the road to the most awesome method to make extremely high powerful computer system. In this system, the computer would communicate with those plants, like corn by using chemical communication, what bases the synthetic arbiter chemical.


In this communication, the computer would be connected to the similar gas detectors, what are using in the chemical warfare protective systems. And in theory, the similar system can allow that the computer could communicate with those plants. But if we would put this system in practice, we must open that chemical communication code, and then we could create two layer computer system. The upper layer would be the computer, what could be used for so-called fast computing, but the downed layer, where the plants are can be used as the slow computing. But when we want to create this kind of computing system, with intelligent corn Plantagenet.


And if we could communicate with plants, we could create the warning system, what can detect any threat in the world. When scientists would try to break the chemical messages between plants, they use the methodology, where the plants are damaged, and then the detector would be used to analyze those chemicals, what are released in that process. If the chemical code can be open, that thing can be used to create the biological warning systems. In some theories, the plants can identify the threat, what is facing them.


Those things might be the technology of tomorrow, where the plants and animals can communicate with people when there would be computerized decoders with loudspeakers and some parts of the animal communication can be emulated by the human. In those cases, the signals of the animals like orcas are recorded, and the sensors will follow the behavior of those whales. That makes possible to communicate with animals, and in some cases give them some orders.


If after some signal the group would start to flee, that signal can play them if there is some kind of volcano eruption on the bottom of the sea, that the group must flee the area. And maybe in some day some of those animals can equip with EEG-transmitters, what would follow the actions on brain core and then the scientists can compile those signals with the behavior of that animal. That can open us the gate to the world of the animals and give us the new way to communicate with them.

Privatizing force and intelligence

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Privatizing force is the term, that means that the security companies are taking the role, what is traditionally reserved to the state. And the most modern version of this advantage is "private military corporation", what means the private corporation, what gives advice, gives training support and sometimes even take a part in conflicts. The last term means mercenary operations, what are targeted against enemy leaders, and those missions are called "assassination operations". But the private military companies are taking also new roles in the world of the military. That role is the private intelligence services, what are collecting information, what is marked confidential.


Private intelligence services are using the information, what is collected from surveillance cameras and other systems, what is meant for protecting houses and homes. Those corporations know everything about their targets, by collecting and analyzing data, what is collected from the surveillance, traffic control, and clock card systems, and they can break any person's security. But those private corporations have also intelligence satellites, and they sell those pictures, where the resolution is about 2-3 meters. And if we are thinking carefully, those companies are also interested about sending ELINT satellites to the orbital trajectory. One of the most effective ways to collect the information about phone calls and use of data is to route those things thru the own communication satellites.


Those satellites can copy those data to that company, while it sends those bytes forward. And that system can be used with normal RAID-routers, what can deliver all data from the telephone network to the satellite.  Of course, those corporations are interested to launch those satellites to orbit, and that's why they might be interested in co-operation with private space companies. Also, those private military companies are interested to send killer satellites to the orbital, and they might equip with rifle-caliber small weapons like centrifuge guns, what might shoot iron balls against the target, what can destroy targeted satellites.


When we are talking about those private intelligence services connected with the military business, we must understand that the private military corporations have found the new type of role in conflicts. The brand new products of those companies are cyberwarfare, and propaganda, what mission is to turn public opinion against another side of the conflict. This is the new kind of threat to the world, what has become very complicated.