Showing posts with label military aviation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label military aviation. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 16, 2018

Why were German wonder weapons so big flop?

V-2 Rocket was the most well known German
wonder weapons
(Picture I)
https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/why-were-german-wonder-weapons-so-big.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This is the text, what I sometimes wanted to write for explaining, why Nazi wonder weapons ("Wunderwaffe")  were the biggest flops in history? There is one very good reason, why those weapons ever got effect against allied forces, and that was that they were produced so little number, that they would not have any kind of effect against allied forces. Another reason for those flops was that they were produced and drawn by very big hurry, what caused the situation, that there were many mistakes in planning and production of those in paper very good airplanes and submarines. One of the best examples of the good ideas, but in real life, bad and dangerous product was Heinkel 117 "Greif" what motors had got too little coolers, and they made that airplane very easy to burn in airborne.


And because of the Nazi-bureaucracy, nobody changed the drawings, and production of the aircraft, what had two V-motors with a double number of cylinders, but the coolers were metered for half size motors continued even if many of those aircraft were actually started to burn in airborne because of engine overheating. Also, the famous V-2 rockets had one problem, those rockets were actually planned for scientific purposes, and that made them very difficult to a product. The missiles must be the large number, and that's why almost every missile in the world uses solid fuel because that allows manufacturing a large number of missiles. V-2 could be effective if there would be used biological or chemical warhead, but luckily those plans were disbanded.



When we are talking about "real weapons" the problem with those real weapons was that they were ineffective against allied forces. And because of Focke-Wulff and Messerschmitt fighters problems with allied aircraft the Nazi government wanted to make new kind of weapons. One of those weapons what were effective was FX-1400 ("Fritz X"), what was first used in 1943 against Italian battleships and one of the DO-17Z-3 bombers was able to get direct hit to one Italian battleships gun tower. One thing makes me think, that maybe some of those problems with bombers were caused in purpose are involving in this weapon. Why the survivability of those bombers didn't make better by using laughing gas or some other oxygenase in the motors of those bombers, what would allow them to fly higher altitude. And avoiding the air defense and some fighters of allied forces.


That was shown how effectively guided missiles could be worked, but the problem was that the Luftwaffe had to transfer the production of bombers to the fighters, and that caused the loss of a number of bombers, what had the capacity to carry those glide bombs. Also, the training of airmen to use that weapon was difficult, because allied fighters disturbed those pieces of training, and loss of fuel caused problems for flight operations. When we are talking about German submarines and their weapons, there were made new kind of torpedoes, what could guide to the target by using electric wires, what was in the spinning rod, and the captain of the submarine could drive those torpedoes to the target by using two circuit breakers. Those weapons were ineffective because if the captain of the submarine made the wrong move while losing the sight of the torpedo, would those torpedoes destroy own submarine.


The "Walter turbine", what allowed to drive submarines underwater with high speed flopped because the fuel was too exotic. And the principle, where steam for turbines was created by mixing hydrogen peroxide and water was very good, but those submarines were ready for their first patrol in May 1945, and they couldn't make an influence for the World War II. But those submarines were the very good vision and technically advanced. And some bad rumors tell or claims that they were produced for allied forces as the commercial card, what kind of things the German military engineers could do.  One of the reasons for the failure of those wonder weapons was that their users could not wait for the sign of their effectiveness against the enemy.


If some of those wonder weapons were not hit the target, that meant the delaying of the production of that system. And of course, German factories were gone under the heavy bombings, and that made impossible to the product of those new weapons, and that made them ineffective against any target. They were very technical and difficult to the product. But the air superiority of allied forced Germans to make those weapons, what was not very effective, sometimes because of the small production numbers. Of course in German political culture was very many cases, were the engineer, who made mistakes just executed, and that's why those people hide mistakes, what they made in very high pressure and for those projects were given very short time. That made those machines dangerous for their users.

Sources:


https://www.warhistoryonline.com/world-war-ii/sinking-tirpitz-eu-battleship.html

Picture:

https://www.historyanswers.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/V-2_lift-off-2-e1396520167626.jpg

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/why-were-german-wonder-weapons-so-big.html

Tuesday, May 8, 2018

Making analyze of technical advantages in aviation



F-36 Interceptor
(Picture I)

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/making-analyze-of-technical-advantages.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Next writing is pure hypothetical, and there is full of presumptions. When we are talking about information, what is given about military equipment, we must think also many more things that only the written details. Many times there are more important things, in the parts, what is not purely. The thing what should notice, when somebody writes or tells about AREA-51 or some equipment, what is classified as "Top Secret", is that who would use it, or where it should fly.


This might feels boring, but if some military aircraft home base is AREA-51, and it would fly every mission from that base, would that mean something. When we are talking about military aircraft or any other weapons, we must notice that those equipment need support bases and support equipment. And if we are thinking about the top aircraft in the world like SR-71 "Blackbird" we might guess, why those flights were so expensive to fly.


Same reason might cause the reason, why also B-2 "Spirit" bombers are so expensive. Those aircraft are unique pieces, and that's why they need many unique parts, and probably even the chemical mixture of those aircraft fuels is unique. That makes them very expensive. Also if there would be problems in the mission, those aircraft need support crew, what would handle those planes in the case of accidents. But when we are talking about top military equipment, we must know, that there must be systems, what can abort the mission, if that plane or it's pilot would starting to act unexpected way.


And one of the questions is that if some naval aircraft have the capacity to use hydrogen as a fuel, that gives the unlimited capacity to operate those planes from aircraft carriers. Nuclear powered aircraft carriers have the capacity to make hydrogen by using electrolysis in the chamber, and if there would be aircraft, what have the capacity to use hydrogen in its jet motors, that aircraft would not have limits for its operations. That means the task force doesn't need oil supply for aircraft. and that would also make those aircraft carriers safer because they can make the fuel only when they need it.


The hydrogen what is produced by electrolysis would not end like hydrocarbons, and if we want to be clever, we might equip those aircraft also with oxygen tanks, what means that they would rise very high altitude. If those jet-fighters would use oxygenation in their jet motors, they can rise to the orbital trajectory.


If we are thinking about the controlling those aircraft, they might equip with control layers, what is installed in the jettison. Those layers would turn the exhaust gas and allows those aircraft to maneuver outside from atmosphere. This could be the future military aircraft, what can operate in and out of the atmosphere, and that thing has also capacity to destroy satellites by using missiles or laser weapons. Those aircraft or space shuttles can also use EMP-weapons to destroy the satellites electronic equipment when the satellite would look like undamaged, but it's electronics are destroyed.


That would be the catastrophic situation if that happens to "sleeping" satellite, what is sent to space for use in wartime. The EMP makes the situation possible, where those satellites don't wake up, or in the worst scenario somebody might replace the electronic equipment of the satellite by another one using spacewalk, and then that satellite might send the opponent's headquarters position to the weapons. In the worst scenario opponents, the military commander would shoot missiles in their own headquarters. But this is only the hypothetical situation and there is no proof that this kind of things has been done.

Sources:

Picture I

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/61/F-35A_flight_%28cropped%29.jpg/1200px-F-35A_flight_%28cropped%29.jpg 

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/making-analyze-of-technical-advantages.html

What was before the Big Bang (Part II)

 What was before the Big Bang. (Part II) "Our universe could be the mirror image of an antimatter universe extending backwards in time....