Is the reason for autism that there are "too many" certain type neurons in the human brain?

The math neurons are causing a question: is autism an anomaly about neuron groups that control certain skills. If the neuron group that is controlling mathematics skills is too dominating. That means there are fewer neurons for handling some other skills.

The discoveries like math cells in human brains are leading neurologists to track the origin of autism. The savant autism and math-cells are causing an idea that maybe autism is the disorder. In the relation in cell groups in human brains. The specialized neuron group is controlling every single skill that person has. That means there are "math neurons", "language neurons", "musical neurons", etc.

 And if there are "too many" neurons that are controlling some skill. That means there are fewer neurons that are controlling some other skill. Even if we have 300 billion neurons in the human brain every single neuron is responsible in its area. And every single neuron has the area where it's best. So that means autism can be an anomaly in the relations of the neurons that control certain skills. 

There is made new research about autism. And one sad thing that is seen. Is that sometimes undiagnosed autism is the thing. That is driven a person to suicide. This thing is reasonable because autism causes problems with social relationships. The need to be social is the thing that causes sad things. And I certainly hope that nobody must die because society wants them to be "normal". 

Modern society benefits good social skills, and that means a person, who has autism must always force and drive themselves to social contacts. Being different than others causes. Other people would start to show them with thumps. And being different means fear of being closed out from social relationships. 

Why people would not get autism diagnoses? The problem is that autism is the diagnosis that is stamped as "mental". This means that autism causes thoughts that this diagnosis has caused that person would kick out of school. 

Autism is a problem with social communication. And that means the autistic person must use more energy in social relationships than the so-called "normal" person. The problem is that society is benefiting so-called "normal" people who are social. And if there is some kind of anomalies in behavior. That means the person is "weird". And especially at a young age, that kind of thing is a catastrophe. 

This means that person would need more energy for creating social relationships. And that thing will bring extra pressure in the life. If the person must always concentrate on behavior and force being social. That thing can drive that person to self-destruction. And that thing is sad to read. 

So is autism the anomaly in the relations of the specific neurons that are controlling certain skills? 

Autism is one of the things that are not researched very well. Things like savant where the person has extraordinary skills in the very thin sector are causing the question, why some person can make the computer program or play some composition. But they cannot make things like cooking potatoes. There is no certain skill that savant autists have. 

Savant-autists might be extraordinarily talented music players. Or they might be extraordinarily talented mathematicians. That thing means that there is might be too many neurons. Those are needed for controlling some special skills. Researchers found so-called math cells in human brains. So there must be "music cells" and "language cells" and "computer programmer cells". 

The new findings like the math-cells in the human brain are causing theories that maybe autism is the disorder in the specialization of neurons. When we are looking at savant-autistic people we sometimes see extraordinary mathematical skills. And that thing means. That there is a possibility. That too many math cell is in their neural structure. So that means autism would be the disorder in the specialization process of the neurons. 

https://scitechdaily.com/high-rate-of-possible-undiagnosed-autism-discovered-in-people-who-died-by-suicide/

https://scitechdaily.com/specific-math-neurons-identified-in-the-brain/

https://scitechdaily.com/new-clues-to-autism-mystery-different-risk-genes-with-same-effects-on-brain-development/

https://scitechdaily.com/treatment-in-early-life-prevents-autism-symptoms-from-developing-in-mice/

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savant_syndrome

How to teach social skills to robots and AI?

One of the versions is to make a large-scale database structure where is different versions of words are used in social situations. Then the programmer makes the first connections between databases. After that, the system starts to talk with its creators. 

The thing is teaching social skills for AI is quite an easy thing in theory. It's just connecting databases. But social skills are more than just saying words. They are noticing the facial expressions taking the hat off when going to the church. And other kinds of things.  

But if we want to make the AI what discusses like a real person that requires a lot of databases and connections between them. If the system would make the job interviews that thing requires lots of data. And if somebody says or asks about things that are not in the database, the system might ask the programmer to answer by talking or writing it to the computer. 

The thing is that if we want that AI to talk with us about everyday situations. That thing is really hard to make. The thing is that we don't normally recognize. That people are not using written standard language in everyday speech. So that requires that the databases can understand dialects. If we want to make an AI that has a very large set of skills. That requires large-scale databases. 

The problem with regular computer programs is that they are not using fuzzy logic. In the discussion programs, the fuzzy logic is made by using multiple databases that are connected with a certain social dialogue. Those databases are involving dialect words. 

They are connected to databases there is written standard language. And then those things are connected to the database that is including social dialogue. The thing is that the programmer can write social dialogue by using dialect words. And that makes the robot more like a human. 

If the social behavior like words that the AI uses are right the programmer or teacher would accept or deny that thing. If there is no match for an answer the programmer would write the right answer for the machine. 

The idea is that when the person is discussing with AI. It would record the things that the opponent is saying, and then answer. This kind of AI might have other parameters like images of the things facial expressions in certain situations. The AI is the ultimate tool in cases like job interviews and especially in video interviews. 

The system can follow things like the length of the brakes between the words. And how the voice is chancing when the person is talking. But it can also look for things like touching the nose during the interview. What kinds of things are marks of lies. That kind of system would also pick things like does the interviewed person has some kind of skills what the interviewer wants to find. 

When the interviewer asks about things like computer skills and what to do in certain situations the job seeker would cover the missing skills in long answers. That means that the interviewer would not notice that there are missing parts in the skills that the computer operator requires. 

 Like how to connect systems to the net. Or something like that. The system might record the answer. And then compare the answer with the actions what the worker should do in those cases. If there is no match, the person would not understand what to make. 

In the cases like job interviews, the AI can search if there are lots of the same names in the lists of referees in different job applications. If the same referees are always in the CV:s of the persons whose work is not. There is something wrong with those referees. 

https://likeinterstellartravelingandfuturism.blogspot.com/

The psychopath is human without feelings

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

We should be worried if somebody hides homicide. If that person can act normal way when the murder what this person has made is under the talking, would that mean that this kind of person could make more murders, and maybe this person is so-called "psychopath". Psychopathic personality is the very dangerous thing because they would not have the social conscience, and that's why they could make murders, and hide those things at home. 

If the person can act like nothing was happening, when this person sees the picture of the victim, might this thing cause by some personality disorder. Psychopathic personality could be very handsome and seem so-called "Mr nice guy" or "perfect husband or wife." That means that those persons can act very handsome way, and they are actually very good psychological eye, what means those persons can please the persons of the family. 

Psychopaths can allow their children to use alcohol or drugs at home if that serve their own benefits. And this makes them very dangerous persons because psychopath can also sacrifice something for getting more benefits, and this is how they differ from narcissist. The psychopath can also play sometimes altruist or even save somebody's life if that supports that persons covert stories.

Those persons are masters of manipulation, and they are also very clever people. And the biggest difference between psychopath and narcissist is that psychopath doesn't have feelings at all. If some narcissist kills people when they are disappointment, and don't please them enough. In that kind of actions, the killer gets the passion of the crime, and the reason for those actions is, that those persons made something wrong. 

But the psychopath would not even care about this thing. That kind of person shoots people like they were some target frames. They would shoot somebody and after that go shopping, and think about what kind of chips they would like to buy only a couple of minutes after the incident. When they are talking about murders in prisons, they would not make any difference between homicides and buying the lemonade. And that would make them look like perfect monsters. Those people are the most dangerous criminals, what society can ever face.

https://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/rikos/artikkeli/kuka-murhasi-piian-30-vuotta-sitten-henkirikosta-pimittava-henkilo-on-hyvin-poikkeuksellinen-he-vaikuttavat-ulkoisesti-normaaleilta-jopa-miellyttavilta/6999544#gs.3yvDlDQ