What separates us from AI?

Today we use lots of time to think, why does AI decrease our IQ? The answer is this: this modern time where we live benefits superficial people. Our working life encourages us to have maximum velocity. There is nothing wrong with the velocity-based working life. But the problem is that the measurement tools for velocity are things like how many executions we make during our working day. The measurement tool can be how many screws we tight. Or how much money we bring to our employer. 

Deep thinking is not encouraged in our working life. When somebody sits in a coding company, that person should use the AI assistant. Can you even seriously imagine that you would go to the library and borrow a book about the problems? And would you have time to stop deeply thinking about things that something really means? How often in the week, do we discuss philosophically and think deeply about things that we really see? We can do many things without deep thinking and logic. 

And when we think about things like some 1970s chess simulators, we must ask ourselves are those things really thinking? Do some ATARI, or Commodore 64 really think? It can drive a car on screen, but does it think? The system can move chess buttons and win chess games or some formula games against humans. But is that a mark of advanced thinking? Or does the horse, who sees three fingers and knocks the floor three times using its hoof, be some doctor of philosophy? Is a chess simulator with 64 kb memory more intelligent than some university professor? Maybe that thing is not as versatile as a professor. 

The IQ is something only if we compare it with something else. If we play chess alone or make something else, we don't need to be intelligent. If we are surrounded by people who have an extremely high IQ, in that case even a high IQ doesn't mean impressive. Same way. If our only opponent in a chess game is Garry Kasparov. That makes all of us seem like very bad chess players. Then we can think how ordinary chess player Kasparov is. Did an ordinary player play 2533 matches at the world champion level and win 1371 of those games? That means 54,13% winning games. But that happened at the highest possible level of the chess game. So does an ordinary player ever reach that level? 

But if the professor wins the AI in chess that is not news. The news is that the professor, some AI chatbot, or quantum computer loses a chess game against that machine. Nobody cares how many things the professor made before that chess game. Nobody even cares if the professor plays that person’s first chess game. And nobody even asked if the AI played chess before, or did the AI even knew how to move buttons. In the same way, a professor might not necessarily play chess at all. The fact is that all geniuses don’t even play chess. And if AI learns like humans, there must be something there that gets things like button movements. The computer can play chess but it might not do anything else. 

Normally we say that AI simply mimics things and then it doesn’t have a deep knowledge of things that it makes. When I read about that kind of thing, I sometimes remember one question from philosophy exams. That question is: “What separates philosophical thinking from the every day, or regular thinking?”. The answer is that philosophical thinking is deeper and more analytic than regular thinking. And that brings new questions into my mind. That is when we last exercise philosophical, deep thinking?”. When we do something, like turn screws in workplaces, do we really think about the purpose of that action? 

How deep out thinking? And how deeply do we think about things that we do in everyday life? The thing that’s enough is that we do what we must and that’s it. We have no time to think deeply about what some screw or other things can do. We simply do our job and that’s it. The thing is that humans learn through mimicking. We know many things. We know how to drive cars and use computers. We know how to fly airplanes and still, we don’t know anything about those things. We can drive cars. But we don’t need to know what happens in the car when we pull the gas pedal. We know that cars accelerate, but we must not know how cars make that thing. 

We could put the car to react with the gas pedal two ways. We can make physical contact between the gas pedal and the engine. Or we can use a camera that registers the gas pedal’s position. Then the AI accelerates or brakes the vehicle. For that system, the AI doesn't need any deep knowledge of things that it does. The system must simply accelerate the electric engines if we use electric cars. And the fact is that the AI must not even know what an electric engine is. When a car accelerates the system can involve code there is the word “engine”. Then some control circuits have a code that makes it react to the signal that is meant for the engine. 

Same way, if we hear the word that is our name, we automatically react to that thing. Our name is the thing that activates our attention. Sometimes we think about our names. But we forget that we learn that thing. Why cannot our name be C3PO? Because our parents didn’t give that name to us. Our names are “Jacks” and “Jills” because our parents gave those names to us. But have we ever wondered why some names are reserved for girls and others for boys?  And then we learn that those words are our names. 

But if our parents would give the name C3PO to us. We would react to that as our name. But do we ever imagine, why cannot our name be C3PO? Because we never thought that before. Then we can go back to begin, and ask how to describe thinking. Does thinking mean that we think how many times we hit some nails? Or does thinking mean how many chess games we learn? 

The thing is this: if we drive about 10000 kilometers without accidents or we win millions of chess games in our life that is not news. The news is that if some robot car drives off the road. Or if some supercomputer loses a chess game to some ATARI chess machine. Those things can be translated into that maybe the ATARI chess machine is more intelligent than humans and supercomputers. 

How much can AI affect our genomes?

In this text, I will not write about genetic engineering. I will write about the non-purpose processing of our genetic and environmental backgrounds. 

AI and evolution are the things that cause interesting ideas. The big question is: can AI and the internet affect evolution? And the answer is that those things are already affecting evolution. When we think about things like dating services. People search for people who are like themselves. The problem is simple. Similar types of people search for dates on the net. 

We know that DNA has some kind of role in people's behavior. And things like lifestyle are made by society. So our lifestyle and behavior are made by two major groups of abilities and features. Some of those abilities and features are hereditary. And some of them are formed by the environment and society. 

If people want to make dates through the internet. They must fill out the form. And that is the point where the AI affects our genomes. Because people search for similar people as they are, that thing causes segregation and the accumulation of certain genomes. 

**********************************************

When we select our spouses from the group there people have similar behavior as we have, and we advance things like segregation. In the same way, we can say that our behavior is the sum of hereditary and environmental things. If we only meet people who are similar to us. 

That makes our environment homogenous. We don't hear things that we don't want to hear. And that advances the segregation. That causes. Also a situation. Where we hear only similar opinions that we have. That advance makes our visions thinner than ever before. 

That destroys real discussions and the possibility. To see other points of view. Things are also governed by. We see only things that we can create ourselves. And that means. We cannot even get other opinions to our discussions. 

**********************************************

Genetic material and environment affect people's behavior. That means we choose people who have the same economic background and similar genomes. That is the thing that can affect the entire human population. 

The net allows us to make dates all over the world. And the AI is an effective tool to make the match with people who use the net. That means those people are more effective in producing descendants. Than people. Who search for their spouse from the local bar. 

The AI can search for people who have similar hobbies, favorite food, and other similar hobbies and work. That means. If the system gets ordered the person wants a spouse who plays some musical instruments. And the thing is that the algorithm can use the form and other information that it gets to select the perfect mate. The system can search things like the musical AI-experts from the net, and then offer them dates. The form that a person can feed can be similar to that used in animal breeding. 

The same methods can used with humans. When we use things like normal test-tube fertilization. There is always the possibility to select gemmates using a similar method. That the network dating tool uses. When it selects people whose dates are successful. In those cases, the system will not use things like genetic engineering. It uses the method. That has been a long time used in horse breeding. AI can affect us and our descendant's genomes in purpose or without purpose. 

The fact is that. AI can increase segregation when people select similar spouses and friends. As they are. The internet is the tool that can make us more isolated than ever. That is the sad thing. That destroys real discussion and helps us to select information narrower than ever before. Because those algorithms select our mates from the net using variables that make sure that our dates please us that makes it possible for us to hear and see only things that we can accept. That might look comfortable. But that destroys our ability to hear and see other choices. 

How to release the creativity of conventional thinkers?

The main problem with so-called silent knowledge is how to make that person who has silent knowledge share that knowledge with others people. When we are thinking about silent knowledge we must realize that silent knowledge that keeps in people's heads doesn't benefit the company. So how to motivate people to share that silent knowledge?

All people have a similar brain. All people have similar neural structures. So why are all people not creative? That is one of the most interesting questions in psychology. There is made a research on how to wake up productive and creative thinking in regular people. But when we make those research we must remember that when people get space and support being creative. They turn to creativity. 

That means we create the right environment that supports creativity. We can wake creative thinking in every person's mind. We are always jealous of people like Leonardo Da Vinci. We should realize what kind of benefit those people could bring to R&D work. 

In that model, we can say that every single person is creative, and people must dare to be creative. And then people must dare to tell their ideas to other people. So if we cheat other people of their ideas they might keep them in their minds. 

And that is a sad thing when we are making new products. If people are afraid to bring their ideas to other people's knowledge, those ideas remain unknown. And those silent ideas benefit anybody. If people don't dare to tell their ideas those ideas remain unknown. 

One reason why people are afraid to tell their ideas is that they are afraid of discrimination. People who are different than the majority are always in danger of discrimination. 

When we are thinking about creative people and people who have things like ADHD we face one common thing: Those people are different from the majority. When people are creative. Some other people are jealous. 

Jealous people can tell "dirty things" about people who are somehow different from what they are. Sometimes those stories cause witch hunts in working society. When a person is different. That means people are watching them more carefully. 

That thing causes discrimination. Same way, when a person has things like ADHD, that means people are different. Being different causes discrimination. 

The thing is that creative people are many times also different than others. This is one of the reasons why creative people more often get depression and other kinds of things. When people are different from than majority. 

That is always causing danger of discrimination and isolation. Isolation causes depression. But is it so, that different people like people with ADHD have depression more often than "regular" people? Or are other people just sharper with people, who have ADHD or who are creative? The thing is that many people think that if the person is different, that justifies discrimination. 

https://scitechdaily.com/new-research-reveals-the-secret-to-unleashing-creativity-in-conventional-thinkers/

https://scitechdaily.com/adhd-persists-throughout-life-strongly-linked-to-mental-health-issues-like-anxiety-and-depression/

https://shorttextsofoldscholars.blogspot.com/

Teleportation can be possible in the future.

 

Are fictional James T. Kirk and teleportation be possible someday in the future? Can we someday teleport something more complicated than single photons or electrons? Can we teleport machines or humans somewhere in the future? 

Maybe in the distant future, we can teleport people. The system would use the laser ray to transform the particle or particle group to wave movement. Then that wave movement will turn into a hologram. And the electromagnetic whirls or quantum rings are starting to form the particles inside the hologram by benefiting wave-particle duality. 

Information for this operation. Will be sent in the form of qubits. And qubits determine the position of the particles in the hologram. Then those particles will be synthesized by using electromagnetic whirls that are making the particle-wave duality in the hologram. 

In the wildest visions, teleportation can make by using a black hole. 

The black hole will close the object in it. And then, the object can send by using the wormhole or the black hole can be shot to the target. Then electromagnetic vacuum will destroy singularity and release the object from inside it. 

In very interesting idea is that the black hole will create in the transported object. Then that thing will drive to the heavier black hole in another laboratory by using quantum entanglement. Or the black hole will shoot to another laboratory. 

Then the singularity will remove from that object by using a WARP bubble or electromagnetic quantum vacuum. That electromagnetic vacuum will drive energy away from that black hole and then the thing that is inside it will be released. But that thing is one of the visions that are connected to teleportation. 

Maybe that is possible in the future. 

Quantum teleportation is possible but can we teleport things like humans? That thing is the everyday operation in fictional movies like Star Trek. The thing is that teleportation means that material is turned into wave movement and sent to the target, where that wave movement will return to its original form. So can we teleport something else than electrons or photons? Can teleportation be possible in the molecular or even in more complicated structures? 

The answer is not yes or no. We cannot turn complicated entirety into wave movement. And then return that thing in its original form. The thing is that the wave-particle duality is making it theoretically possible that if a thing like a car will put in the front of a laser ray and laser ray will turn that thing to wave movement. 

Then if that radiation will impact the quantum wall that stops it the wave-particle duality makes it possible that the wave movement can return to the same order, that it was. Before it turned into wave movement. But that thing is extremely difficult to make in real life. 

Teleportation is like making puzzles. The system puts its entirety into pieces. And then the system transforms those pieces into photons. And that's an easy stage in operation. 

But remaking that puzzle is far more difficult than breaking the entirety. The problem in teleportation is how to put those pieces from wave movement back into particle form. And how to reform the structure that those particles formed before they turned to wave movement?

The fact is that we can make things like qubits. And quantum teleportation is the key element in quantum computers. So when we are thinking possibility to turn all particles in the human body will turn to photon qubits. And be sent to receiving chamber in the form of a laser ray. The system must number those photon qubits. And that helps the computer to put those photons back to their original position. 

There is the possibility that the operating system can put those photons can put their original places. The wave-particle duality makes it possible to create electromagnetic rings or whirls in the hologram. And wave-particle duality will turn that hologram into particles. So that kind of holographic teleportation can make it possible to transport even humans in the form of wave movement. But the problem is how to turn that wave movement back to the particle-entirety. 

Theoretically, that thing is like making puzzles. But that thing is a little bit more difficult to make in real life. Teleportation can be possible but modern technology allows us to transport single photons or some other elementary particles.

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

What self-awareness means?

Cogito Ergo Sum (I think; therefore I am) 

René Descartes

Our existence is at the center of our life. Somebody might blame me for that "me-centric" way to see things. But who is in the middle of our life? Or who is the main character in our life? That character is the thing who is the thing that reads this text without moving lips. When we are thinking that we are the center of our own life we must understand one thing. 

If something happens to us, the only person who feels that thing is we or I, if we are thinking only of ourselves. If somebody says that we are idiots, we have the right to feel bad about that thing. We have the right to have bad days. And if somebody is acting like we air, we have the right to feel offended. We don't have to smile and feel good if somebody is bullying us. 

If somebody acts like we are garbage, we have the right to feel bad. Even that person is boss we must not like everything that those persons are saying. If we get a speeding ticket, we must not smile at the police even that person is working for the state. We have the right to feel bad in that situation. 

Sometimes people are thinking that people just sitting and staring at walls are not doing anything important. There are always better ways to waste time than just staring at the wall and concentrate on the abyss. During we are string the wall we are concentrating on the thing that is making humans so superior. That thing is called thinking. Thinking is existence and thinking is the consciousness existence of the person.

Cogito Ergo Sum said philosopher René Descartes once. In English that thing means I think; therefore I exist. Maybe that quote came into the mind of that philosopher when somebody asked him are you existed? And how do you know that you exist? How do people know that they exist? The answer that René Descartes gave was that the reason why he existed was that he thought. He thought and realized his existence so that meant he exists. 

Existence is right to have own space.  But when the idea of existence and thinking came in the mind of Descartes that thing caused probably one induction thought. How do we know that things that we are thinking are real? They are real to the thinker. But they are not probably the same way as real to other people. We know that there is no absolute reality. Our senses are things that are causing that the observations that we are getting are always unique. 

But the experiences that we have are also coloring our way to see things. And one thing that we should see is that we exist. Our existence is one thing in our life that we are not thinking about too often. We are not realizing that our existence is the center of our life. Everything that happens to us happens to us, not the person who stands next to us. If something hurts somebody else that thing is not happening to me. That thing happens to that other guy. Same way if somebody or something hurts me would not hurt the person next to me. 

Could computer someday predict future?

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

In Isaac Asimov's book, "the Foundation" is the fictional or hypothetical thing, known as "psychohistory" This thing s actually the way to predict the behave of billions of humans by using similar mathematical formulas, what are used to calculate the movements of the giant gas masses. The idea of psychohistory would be that those computers would collect all data, about what has been happened in history, and then use that data to predict the future. In those predictions is used similar software what is used in astronomy and meteorology for predict the large mass of gas.

Mathematical formulas, what is used in this action would be given the predictions with the large mass of humans. The reason for that is the single individual would have too many transformers, and that makes single persons or individuals very hard to predict. When we are thinking of clouds, we cannot predict the place of single waterdrop, but meteorological computer programs can predict quite well the place of the cloud. What bigger is the gas mass, the sharper is the result, what calculations would give about the prediction of the gas mass.

The idea is similar than in the rivers. We have hard to predict the place of the individual water molecule, but the prediction of the water line, what goes in the river is quite easy. Same way is easy to predict the route of water if the dam would collapse. When we are transferring this thing to sociology, we must think the ants. It's very hard to know, what single individual Ant would do next, but when we see the Ant group, what is looking for food for their group, we can predict quite good, how those bugs would act.

This is the idea of psychohistory. Individual human prediction is hard to predict, but the large groups of humans can predict quite easy because controlling large groups is very hard. When large groups of people would be released the stopping and controlling those groups is hard. But the predictions about their behavior or direction, where that group is going is very easy. And this thing has caused the thoughts, that there are plans to make that kind of experiments.

Here we must say, that this kind of systems would give sharper predictions for the long time period than the short period. Here we are talking about the thing, that the common prediction can be sharp, but then that thing disappears in the jungle of single cases. This thing is like a highway. We don't know every turn of the road, but we know where the road is going. This is the thing in that kind of attempt to predict the future. Using computers make possible to collect and handle multiple variables, and compile them with together.

The inventions of free energy by Nikola Tesla

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa


When we are thinking about one of the most incredible genius masterminds in the World, the man, whose name was Nikola Tesla, we might think that the inventions, what this man made are somehow impossible, but then we must realize, that every one of his inventions is conducting with electromagnetism. And the induction motor would give use great vision, what the creation of free energy by using Earth as the power source would mean. In this case, Tesla would only increase the rotating speed of nucleus of Earth and that would be made incredible strength to the magnet field of Earth.

This could be a fascinating idea, but the changing the power of the magnetic field of our planet can have a negative influence on nature. But Tesla could do that thing by using extremely powerful magnets, what works like the stators of the induction motor. The thing, what makes electricity to those magnets would be capillary motors, the capillary pipes would put in the deep sea, and the water what rises thru that tube would conduct thru the turbine. That kind of things is causing the talking about using fossil fuel. Those systems can separate electrolytic way Hydrogen from Oxygen, what is connected in the water molecule, but easy to separate by using electricity, and that gas can conduct to the tubes, what are used to delivering natural gas to the customers.

The idea of the using atmosphere to conducting electricity is, of course, incredible, and it could be done by using Tesla-cols. The atmosphere would be ionized by conducting the electricity to it, and this thing caused the most incredible idea of the world. The thing made possible to create the protective field around some target. The Tesla-coils allows to target the lightning, what travels thru atmospheric plasma, and it would cause the destruction of all electric equipment.

The second thing, what this man invented was the ice-hockey size thing, what would cause Earthquakes. This thing might be done by using radio waves or something like that and make the bubble below the Lithosphere. That thing might cause the collapse of the rocky layer, or the other thing would be to use the resonance for causing the synthetic earthquake. The idea would be that to the rock of the Earth would send the soundwaves, what would make it resonate, and this could cause Earthquakes. This kind of sound could send by using Sonar-system or loudspeaker, and it could be devastating for the building.

How to map the social connection of some person?

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Do you know that Putin is three clicks away from you at the social media? This thing is investigated by some university, and that conclusion bases the claiming, that every person on earth would be two or three person thread from everybody, who uses social media. This thing makes us think, that in almost every person's social media network is some kind of intelligence officer.

Those officials serving for intelligence or police, and those persons mission is to find out drug dealers and other people, who are making criminal activities. The data, what is connected is problematic because it will uncover the real interests, what the users of the social media have. And the thing is, that connecting the information, what is collected from different sources can be used to make a very good profile of the targeted person.

And don't think, that if you have to pay for some solution makes it safe. Many of the solutions are free for private users, and that helps to control the sources, what are used to collecting information. Because firms must pay for the solution, that would allow filtering that kind of users away from the tracking lists. This means that intelligence services can target the tracking to private users or firms if the firmware solution is used for illegal activities.

There are many ways to investigate the social connections in social media, and one of them is to send the circular letter to that person and ask to deliver that message to all the social connections. The best way to make this thing working perfectly is to use some texts, what are very sensitive or makes need to show empathy. This is the best way to make people deliver those texts to other persons. This makes the social media very interesting place. And if someone would not want to deliver those circular letters, that will make this person sadistic and cold person in the eyes of other users of the social media.

So this is the short and sad story about the way, to find out the persons, who are members of some community. There is nothing wrong about the circular letters and some kind of stuff. But there is one very disturbing thing. They are always so sensitive, that they are going to disturb me, and the things, that some person would die in cancer are very sad. Sometimes there are asked money by using that kind of pictures and stories. And at the same time, they are causing negative for the people, who really need help, and here I'm writing about cases, where that kind of letters are shared because somebody wants to map the social connections. Those methods are strictly against the ethics and moral of the scientific work. And they are causing problems for people, who are in real trouble.

Why aliens haven't destroyed us?

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

All of us think that scientists are some way different than other people, and here I will write about aliens. When we are thinking about great scientists, we must notice, that Dr. Gauss, who lived in 19th. century spent 15 minutes every day in his career by searching and calculating prime numbers. And I would spend 15 minutes every day, to think, about aliens and are they existed? I will always select the hypothesis that aliens exist because that allows me to make longer texts.

Of course, I can write here always that aliens are fake, but then I can choose another point of view. Why aliens seems to be invisible, and when I look at that question, I can handle it in the point of view of the modern anthropology and ethnology. And here the point of view is, how the responsible scientists act when they are facing the primitive people. Are they going to play god to those people? Or are they going to observe those people by staying unseen?

And try to collect every information, what they can get, and as an example find out the method, how those people are caring their sick people because that information might give us the knowledge about the vegetables, what might contain chemicals, what would revolutionize medical industry. Many medicines are complicated molecules, what are difficult to produce chemical factories. But vegetables can be used to produce those chemical combinations, and if they can grow in greenhouses, the medical factories could get the necessary chemicals from those vegetables.  And only one cell of those organisms is enough for making the cloned population of those vegetables.

There was a question in some discussion forum, that why aliens haven't been destroyed us?  In this text, what is coming straight from my mind, might be found some very simple answers for that question. One of those very interesting answers would be, that the hypothetical humanoids would simply afraid some other humanoids. Maybe they are also covering their existence for some other civilizations and might be the reason for saving planet Earth.

Another way to think about this kind of question, if you want to make longer texts, is that here on our home planet is nothing, what humanoids or aliens want. Or what they would not get from asteroids or Kuiper belt. And that means that those aliens would just want to avoid unnecessary violence, and they might also want to work like ethnologists work on Earth. They might want that we are acting normal way, and learn to invent the necessary technology by ourselves.

That means that those hypothetical humanoids would want to support our advantage to independence by avoiding give us technology, what would connect us to them. Maybe they just don't want to play god to us, and this is the thing, what we must remember in every investigation of ethnology. If we are realizing our responsibility, when we are facing the primitive tribes, we are not allowed to give them firearms or some equipment, what makes those persons addicted of us.

Inventing the electronic computer was not an easy process

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are thinking about one of the most important tools of science, the electronic computer, we must realize that inventing that machine was not easy. The first electronic computers or ENIAC-units were created for making nuclear weapons and code-breaking duties for Los Alamos National Laboratories. But before the computer was ready to operate, the creators of that tool must create the command language and the way to input those commands in for the electronic calculating unit.

Electronic computers are the ultimate tool for calculating long series of calculations, and that's why it can make very sharp calculations for parabolic forms. The ability to calculate long series makes computers a very effective tool for code-breakers. Also, computers can comp databases with extreme speed, and that makes it a very effective tool for controlling the passengers and access to places like movie theaters.

And from the ENIAC is a long journey to modern computers, and there were two things, what revolutionized this thing. The keyboard, what makes those systems or their input panel seems like the copywriter, allowed that the computer can be used by a single user. And the second one was TV, what allowed to use computers without paper.

Those things are the most interesting parts of computers, and the last thing, what opened the world of computing for every person in the world was the mouse. The tracking tool, what allowed to draw with the computer and later the graphical interface has also based the use of the mouse. When we are thinking about computers and the men, who are working with them, there are many times some problems to realize that those persons are extreme professionals. And the computing is not very dramatic science, there is nothing happening outside the screen of the computer. But when computer control robots, it can be extremely dangerous for every organism in this planet.

One very interesting thing about the national security

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are many mythical tales of the connections between CIA and some companies. In those cases, CIA makes the security check for those covert actors by the very simple way: the person who wants the job from those companies sends also the job application for CIA, and that allows this intelligence service to make the security check for that company, what works apparently independent.  In some stories, some of those companies are covering even the humanoids inside their walls. But are those humanoids only human-made hybrids or are they coming from outer space? This is the thing, what everybody should think.


Under the control of CIA working highly secured companies are made for creating technology and other things, what are not publicly acceptable, and can make troubles to those workers.  Those solutions, what are creating in those companies are intelligence and military equipment, what is extremely lethal, but different than normal military equipment. Some of those extremely frighten applications are used in "soft-kill" operations, where the target would killed by natural organisms, what don't leave marks to the outside that the question was about the assassination.


There is the tale that some of those companies are working with nanotechnology, and make productions like cocaine- or sugar crystals, where have been closed the eggs of trichina or schistosomiasis worm. The crystals would form that way, they cover the eggs, and after that, the persons, who are sniffing cocaine, would get the eggs of the worms in the lungs or stomach, if they put those crystals in coffee. Those worms are extremely dangerous, and there would need extreme good medical attention if the victim would be wanted to survive.


Sometimes are legends that in those crystals would be HIV-viruses, what are the most capable organisms, if somebody wants to take under control. The HIV-viruses are terminating in the air and this would allow controlling the epidemics and transfer process in the population. Because this virus destroys the immune system, would it force the victim to stay in the sterile areas, and this means, that this person would be totally under the control of the guards.


But there is no proof that the HIV virus was used systematically in those operations or that it's artificially made. But the possible usage of HIV in security operation must be investigated by CIA or KGB. Those organizations are not well known about their sensitive touch in their operations. And this makes people suspect, that the usage this virus for controlling people would be also tested in some prisons.


The level of the viruses in blood could be controlled by doses of the medicals, what should limit the growing of the population of the viruses in the blood of the victims. The way what HIV-virus would seize the people and at the same time the ability to destroyed by air, makes some people believe, that this virus has been created by some biological weapon laboratory, what probably works undercover for controlling the people, who have secret information about the military project in the East or West. The laboratory, what could be created this organism would stay also on the East side of the Iron curtain. But as I just wrote, there is no evidence that the virus has been synthetically made, or it would be delivered in purpose.

The ideas of the modern architecture

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Above this text is a picture of the modern building site at Helsinki, Finland, and I thought that this shows, how the modern materials and innovation change the way to make buildings. The modern materials and the CAD-based computer research allows making more advanced and sophisticated planning for buildings. The next generation buildings are made with CAD/CAM (Computer Aided Design)/(Computer Aided Manufacture)  methodology, what allows to make the buildings, where every part fits perfectly in the position, where it is planned. In this process, the computers would send the CAD  pictures to the company, what makes the elements, and that allows to make unique elements, what have different shapes and metering.


The size and color of each element can be unique, and that makes possible to apply new kind of things in the structure of the buildings.  That allows using the elements and material very sharp, and there would become the minimum number of building waste.  But that technology allows to make houses, where are new kind of components, what was ever before in the normal buildings. That kind of solutions could be the balconies, what can be pulled in, when the weather is bad. That could deny the accumulation of snow. But that kind of detail could be a very interesting part of the building.


That kind of things are the things, what could be standard in the houses of tomorrow. Also, computers would follow the moisture of the elements by using special nanosensors, what collects the information about the moisture and other erosion in those elements. That "smart sand" is the microchips, what meters the quality of the elements, and also the movements of the building. The idea of the intelligent house is that the ventilation and the brightness of the windows would react continually for the temperature and sunlight, that the houses would become more comfortable for people, who live in there.

Why penicillin is losing its power?

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Penicillin was one of the first so-called wonder medical, what was easy to produce and that mushroom poison has saved billions of lives. But the fact is that this medicine has been lost its power. The penicillin is used without control and the problem with this kind of usage is that the bacteria, what have weak genomes would be destroyed. And the bacteria with strong genomes are surviving from this medicine.

The doses and numbers of the penicillin pills have calculated that way, the dose of the medicine is effective against bacteria, and when the period is over, the bacteria would be lost. In this case, the patient must eat all pills, but if this person would not do that, it will begin the eugenics process in that bacteria population. That means the penicillin destroys weak bacteria, and that would make those bacteria stronger than ever before.


This method where bacteria would expose by medicine or ultra-violet light is used to make artificial bacteria population for biological warfare. In the movies, we see that biological weapons are mainly the viruses like Ebola, but in the real life the laboratories, what investigates biological warfare are interested in natural bacteria like tuberculosis because every state in the world has signed the treatment to deny the biological weapons. But those weapons are very attractive in the world of the military.


The producer of the strong bacteria doesn't need complicated laboratories. Only thing, what that person needs is the raising platform where is the bacteria culture and ultra-violet light. By using that equipment can this person create extreme lethal and invisible biological weapons. So this makes this thing so frightening. The actors might not be governmental, and the purpose of the biological weapon could sweep some area clean from people, that some company can begin to dig the diamonds from those areas.


And when we are thinking about the "blood diamonds" of Congo, we might ask, are those diggings happen without the knowledge of the mining companies, or how those diamonds what are using for buying guns for the guerrillas enter the marketing, and how they can sell it to buyers? That kind of people would like that there is no evidence about their actions in the jungles because that would be bad for business. In those officially illegal mining would be many people, who are working as slaves for getting the weapons for the gunmen, who are controlling the diamonds. And if they would inject the bacteria to the workers, they could kill them imperceptibly by using bacteria like cholera or diphtheria, what is easy to claim natural epidemics.  And in that case, the workers must not get their payments, what those guerrillas have promised for them.


The natural organisms are easy to weaponize by making them stronger than before. In those cases, the tolerance capacity of bacteria would be increased by breeding them by using antibiotics or ultra-violet radiation. After that, the super-bacteria would be delivered to the area, and that would seem like normal epidemics, what would be caused by resistant tuberculosis. And here I must ask, is there something, what somebody doesn't want to tell the people about the antibiotics resistant bacteria like tuberculosis, because those things are not often handle in public media?

The analyses of the Botticelli's painting "The Annunciation"

The Annunciation" c. 1485-92
(Metropolitan museum of art)
(Picture I)

http://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/p/the-analyses-of-botticellis-painting.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

"The Annunciation" is a painting, what Botticelli (Alessandro di Mariano di Vanni Filipepi  (1445-1510)) painted in c. 1485-92 is one of the masterpieces of religious arts, and it's the remarkable thing in the history of arts. The reason, why Alessandro di Mariano Filipepi used the name "Sandro Botticelli" in his arts might be caused that this man painted the religious painting, and that's why he had to cover his identity. Those paintings were the politically sensitive thing, and if the painting didn't please the customer, would that cause the prosecution in the inquisition, and in the worst case death, if the inquisition would translate that the painting was blasphemy or it predicts the death of the ruler of the country or even the pope.


In the painting "The Annunciation" Botticelli portraits Virgin Mary, but there are some details, what people might never see. In the painting, the character of the woman is painted in two times, and that's why this image is remarkable. The detail means that in the painting, the Virgin Mary has two roles the role as an angel and the role as the pious woman. Many times I have thought, why Botticelli painted this painting that way, that there is like two Virgin Mary's in the space, what is separated by the wall.


And this thing should create thoughts in the head of the people. The meaning of that art is to warn, that the powerful men have powerful spouses. In this case, the woman or person, who sits next to the men could be even the secretary of the pope. And that means if something hurts that person, or somebody leave that lady without service, would that told probably direct to the pope, and that could cause things, what nobody wants to face.


The idea of this painting is very simple, the angels are walking on Earth in the form of the human, and they would tell everything to the God. The Angel-figures are meaning messenger, and there are many translations about those figures. Angels could mean the nuns or monks, who told everything to the Pope, if somebody played or did something, what was not allowed. The meaning of the angel figure is to remember that somebody always tells the things, what should not be told.


And that's why this figure means simply the message. But it meant the undercover surveillance, and also protectors, who secretly protected especially the children. Because if the parents would humiliate their children they must remember, that in some day own children are stronger than their parents. And this is the reason, why the angels are often portrayed to stand next to the beds of the children. Somebody always sees the injuries, what the humiliation caused. The angel figure is very common in the medieval art, and it has many roles in the world of religious art, what is made for the official use of the church and their officials.

Picture I:  https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/459016

In the world of competition is no altruism

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/


Kimmo Huosionmaa

Let's think about race, and the prize is high. The next person, who takes the part of the race would give you the drink, do you really take it? This is the really interesting thing because if some person is the competitor, we should ask: why this person wants to help us? The answer would be very different than we hope. That person can give us narcotics with that drink, and that would make the disqualification for us.


The same rule can be used in every social situation in the world. If we meet some nice looking man or woman and want to date with that person, we must worry if the person who introduces that man or woman would be the spouse of the introduced person. If the husband or wife are making dates for their spouse, there is something wrong. And if the best recommendations come from the worst competitor, we should think, why this company wants to increase our business?


And if we are looking for the job, we should ask ourselves, why other unemployed people would want us to help us to look for the dream job?  They are also competitors in that process, and the thing, that they would give the telephone number for some other unemployed person could be something, what we don't want to happen. That number can be given for collecting the phone numbers from persons, who are unemployed. And then those phone numbers would give to some telephone marketing companies.


Those phone numbers can cost the home for those people if they order stuff from those telephones. If they are ordering the stuff, there would be change, that persons cannot pay those merchandise. And then the flat must be sold if there is no change to pay the ordered things. Also, those phone numbers might be given for collecting the social relationships from the unemployed people.


If we don't worry about that kind of offers, they can get them to some pyramid hoax ring, where the investors say, that if you would give the money in that organization, that would bring good profits. But in some cases, money just is lost, and the center persons would get good money from the persons, who have given their property in those businesses, what are controlled from some ex-eastern block states.  And this makes the police actions difficult. If this kind of thing is suspected the police report must be made immediately if that thing is noticed.

The philosophical thoughts about manipulation

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This evening is a wonderful time for thinking about the reality, and the reality's influence on our lives. The life is the very strange thing and we are all victims of some kind of things, what we are calling the manipulation. Every person in the world have faced manipulation in some place, and we would not even notice some of those traps until it's too late. In the working life, the manipulation is actually more common than we even can think. And the best examples of those things are the working offers, where is mentioned, that the person must speak five or six languages and be a civil engineer. Of course, that kind things cause interesting thoughts in the person's head and the skills what the job offer consists are very unusual, and the reason for those needs is that they would make easy to deny the applicant in the interview.


People have to need to please the persons who interview the job applicants in the working life, and when they are mention, that they are looking for "good guys", they are making job seeker feel, that if they don't like this person, that job applicant is not "good guy". The need to please makes the job applicant try very hard to give the good image for those electors. But there is one thing, what goes wrong.


The persons, who make the election for jobs are also given the image of their jobs and interests, and if they seem boring, the job applicant sees that the selection has been done. The term "good guy" is meant for making the person shame if the company would show the door after the test period. And this makes think, that maybe they would tell that the person, who closes the door final time, have been the person, who failed in the process.


But was this person only the rented worker, whose application was about two weeks, and then the job ended for natural reasons. In some cases, the companies keep two lines of workers. Another is working with temporary contracts, and others have steady contracts. The temporaries would ever get the steady contracts, because there is something, what companies don't want them to know. And the thing might be, that temporaries have been introduced as the persons, who have been kicked off. This would be guaranteed, that the steadies are good guys, or they can be kicked off. And when they see, that somebody would walk out from the company, that would give good motivation for others. That would make the steadies feel, that they are the best in business.


 After that, the chosen one will get the information, that there were thousands of job applications for that place and position. The purpose of that thing is to scare this person, that if the jobs are not done, would that mean that the next applicant would take this position. So the message is "try hard, and if you fail, you are out". This is one of the best ways to make sure, that the applicant is a good and handsome guy, who gives everything for the firm.

The second civil war of the United States of America

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

So here is the time for some conspiracy stuff, and I decided to make this writing about the "second civil war in the USA". The civil war of the USA in 1861 to 1865 cost over 300 000 casualties and that war was one of the bloodiest in the history of that nation. Today we are concerning the freedom and our privacy, and we have almost forgotten one quite interesting idea of the civil war. When the Union won the war in 1860's there were claiming, that the Southern side of Confederate would try to make relevance in sometimes after the civil war.


 And here is the very interesting thing about that claim or rumor. What if there were another civil war in that nation? What if those politicians and military men were not told about that war to the people, and then nobody even knew about this internal conflict. This theory or story have been told to explain the time of the wild west, and maybe some parts of this story are true. But in the modern time is claiming that some internal groups of USA would want to begin the civil war, and then somebody got an idea, that why people should know about that kind of things? The only information, what is needed is, that somewhere is an armed person, who might be dangerous. This is the only information, what the law enforcement must know when they come to make arrests.


If somebody would serve in the some "shotgun company" in the middle west, why that person would not treat as the normal criminal? Why should every people know about that kind of persons political interests? When we are talking about terrorism, we are facing the fact, that why people should know about that organization? If the terrorist group is well known, it has more easy to recruit people, and here we are facing the question, what if the British have not mentioned IRA? Or newspapers would not be mentioned about the rebel of General Lee? And why that person's military rank mentioned? Why didn't they make that person the normal leader of the outlaw gang?


What if newspapers would not tell, that Lee had some political purposes, and if that man would be mentioned as the normal outlaw, who robbed banks or something? Would somebody join that rebel team? And if the IRA would not ever be mentioned, would anybody even know about that organization? This is the key in the stories about "The second civil war". If nobody ever knows about the rebellions, they would not join that force too easily. And maybe press have been censored the political aspects of the outlaw's actions in the Wild West in the 1880's? Who knows the truth?

Fermi paradox: Where is everybody? (Where are other civilizations?)

https://marxjatalous.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

If we would calculate the number of known planets, what are on the habitable zone of the sun type star we would get number one if we would live in 1950's And if we would see how many known civilizations were in that kind of planets in that time, we can get number one. So if we would calculate the probability to meet intelligent civilization on the Earth-type planet, what is in the habitable zone of the star, we could find number 100. So in every earth type planet, what orbits the star in the habitable zone should have an intelligent life form.


And here we must ask again where are those civilizations? When we are looking at the Drake equation, we must think about the question, where are the aliens, if every earth-type planet in the habitable zone of stars would have intelligent life. Here we must go to the Fermi paradox, the attempt to explain why there would be no answer from another civilization? The one thing in this paradox is, that when the civilization would get some special level of science and technology, they could destroy themselves with nuclear weapons.


This explanation is one of the most well-known things about this paradox. And then somebody would ask, "Was the Second World War the ultimate test", and if the mankind passed that test, would it become super civilization? The other thing in the Fermi paradox is that the gamma-ray bursts would destroy the civilization, and the opponent would claim, that if the civilization would have enough high technical level, they could evacuate to the dark side of their home planet.


And also moving to the dark side or underground network of tunnels, would that civilization survive even from the biggest cosmic catastrophes. When we are thinking about the communication between civilizations, there is, of course, the possibility that the hypothetical alien would not answer, because it would not feel the communication safe. That means it afraid that some other hostile aliens would locate it, and then the war between worlds would raise.


Sometimes some persons think, that maybe the afraid of conflict between two very technical civilizations would survive the Earth. Because if some civilization would use weapons like Death Star, it would show the power to other civilizations, what have the even better equipment and technology. Sometimes I have faced the theory, that other civilizations would leave us alone because we would be too pathetic being seriously taken.


That kind of talking is very usual between philosophers. Or maybe the radio signals, what are left to the universe are too weak to notice. Maybe the radio waves, what are coming from other stars and galaxies are acting like ECM-jammer system. That radio-transmission can cover the radio-waves, what is sending by using Hydrogen Alpha-frequency. Maybe we are alone maybe not. But the searching would continue.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_paradox

Writings about things, what are actually opinions. (Fermi's paradox and Drake equation)

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/ 

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are people, who do not understand one thing when we are writing something, we have the right to tell our opinion about that. And one of the things, what seems to cause very strong feelings are writings about SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) and aliens. Writings about those things are actually opinions. When we are writing about some kind of extraterrestrial civilizations, we are always facing the Fermi's paradox and Drake equation where that physician or astronomer calculated his famous formula, that if the known habitable civilizations are the division with the known planets, we could get the percent of planets, where are civilizations.


When we are thinking about Drake's formula, we must ask why this man didn't make it more simple to understand.  The number of known civilization in time when Drake wrote his formula was one. And the number of known planets was nine because Pluto was a planet at that time. So the Fermi paradox and Drake's formula should go was in that time 1/9*100. Now this formula goes that the number is very much lower than in Drake's time. And the Fermi's paradox is always connected with Drake's formula. In the real life, Drake's formula is more complicated than this formula, what I wrote here.

And in this case we are facing the truth, that everything when we are thinking about that paradox we are facing that we are writing about opinions of that formula. When we are discussing with the doctor of philosophy about that thing, we must realize that this person would always win us, by claiming that we would find another civilization after 100 years. Every time when we are talking about extraterrestrial intelligence, we are talking about our own opinions about that question. We always forget that extraterrestrial life form could be some kind of vegetable. Even if the planet is covered by vegetables and forests, that would not actually mean, that there would be animals at all, and this is the very interesting thing.


When we are thinking about aliens or some intelligent life form, we are forgetting that the "alien" can be created by the human by connecting the genomes of animals to human DNA, and that makes possible to create alien in the terrestrial laboratories. Aliens are the very interesting object for discussions, but when we are thinking about the shape of those strange forms, we might think about the person, who thinks with the different way than other persons.



So in this case, we might think the alien some kind of individualist, or something, what we could ever imagine. When we are thinking about reptilian hybrids, we could face the creature, what would be easy to follow. If that creature makes the things in some secret organization, that thing would ever give any information to unauthorized organizations. And it would not officially exist, what makes it easy to control. In this case, the scientist would create the creature for making secret missions for the governments or private corporations.

Annex I Drake Equation (Wikipedia)




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_equation

The Christianity and secret societies

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Don't worry, I don't invent all my texts myself, and the ideas of these writings are taken from the Internet. The YouTube channel "Stuff they don't want you to know" is the very interesting place, if you want to know, why somebody believes conspiracies or UFO:s. The most common conspiracy in the world might be an inner circle stock trading, that means some business partners would tell their friends about the coming share issues, that allows this group to make very good profits.


And here is one thing, what is very interesting, because the conspiracies and cover-ups are the very interesting thing to think about the hidden use of the power inside some nations. When we are thinking about the "Family" or Christian community, what might have some kind of influence about the policy of the United States of America, we forget one thing. Those religious groups would allow very good cover for the businessmen, who work in the very illegal area, and makes the inner circle share trading.


The religion is the very good thing to hide something really big. And under the cover of the religious meetings could be made almost anything, what could come in the mind. And the religious meetings are the good forum for making business contacts. In some claiming some Christian societies also give the place, where the businessmen can make inner circle stock trading. This thing is illegal, and if that person would burn about that the coming share issue has been informed to the limited group, would the judge give very big punishments about that kind of thing.


The idea of this could be that some businessmen would use the church to cover their real way to make money. In this case, some businessman would just tell other, that there would be releasing the shares of the company before the shares would become to the shares come to sell, and that would give change to make very big profits.


And that could explain the big incomings of some of those communities. That makes very interesting ideas in the mind, about how some businessmen do business. And why some families can make so big money in the business life. There are many secrets in the financial life, and maybe some people would make money with that kind of illegal activities.


Almost every year, some person would be under the investigations with inner circle trading, what is the very sad thing. But are those suspicions caused only by coincidence or by purpose is very hard to prove.  And at the last, we must consider, that maybe some persons are only lucky and they can make very big money in the stock trading business by legal methods.