Economics and war

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Economics would not cause war, but the bad economic situation is sometimes the reason for beginning the war. When the economic situation is bad, the radical politicians would get more votes, and that's why the war would be closer in the bad economic situation. Radical politicians would get more votes because they promise something easy and concrete solutions for growing economies.

And in this case, would the aggression against weaker nation be the good choice for making people look another way, and one of the reasons, why the war would seem to be the good maneuver is that many of the workplaces, what the radical forces create is found in the military and other governmental institutions. And that kind of solutions costs money. Also, this kind of things would cause the problems, if the government uses the military as the silent for the opposition.

The thing goes that way, the persons who publish the texts, what are against the government's line would be kept silent by forcing them to military service. And that would help to make censorship more acceptable than if those persons would be walking on the streets. In the military service, the reason for censorship would be claimed to be the secret military equipment.

Also, the arresting of those people would argue by spying for other states. The reason for militaristic governments existence would be fear. The fear of the nighttime arresting and disappearing, what means execution or sending the person to some prison camps. The reason why many political arresting would be accepted in history was that they were covered for psychiatric reasons.

The father of the Soviet hydrogen bomb Andrei Sakharov sent to prison by KGB, what argued that thing as the arresting by schizophrenia. This diagnose is made for many nuclear scientists for protecting the secrets of the nations. And the reason for that diagnose was to make those persons keep silent. Also, those persons are claimed to have homosexual behavior, that there would be no unnecessary spouses in their lives. And somebody might face the faked deaths because nobody wanted those secrets would leak.

When the dominance turns against the dominator

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/when-dominance-turns-against-dominator.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/when-dominance-turns-against-dominator.html

What actually means "neutron bomb phenomenon" in business life

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Are you ever called a term "neutron bomb effect" when people are speaking about the industrialism or economics? The name of this phenomenon causes a weapon what is called the neutron bomb. That weapon kills people and leaves the material untouchable. And this is a route of modern car manufacturing technology. Companies want's to maximize their profits, and that's why they want to operate with the minimum workforce. There is a man in the USA who is called as a "Neutron Bomb Jack".


He is a leader who began to transform car factories production lines for full automatized robots, and after his work, there was a situation where workers still were unemployed, and robots worked in factories. Guess how much profits those companies could get, because they can make robots to work 24 hours per day without any brakes of production. The robot worker doesn't need medical attention, payroll or social security. If robot has malfunctions the company just carries it to recycling bin


That's why human workers are replaced by robots. This means that power of labor union will not any more work as a pressure method in discussions of rules in a  financial environment. When robots replace human workers in the car business, the company has no need for humans as a workforce. Robots don't make strikes and they don't take coffee brakes during the working day. And they don't need a salary of their work.


The only price what the company must pay is electric bill and of course a price of the robot. This advancement of industrialization makes possible to produce just so many products, what will be sold. But this kind of thinking makes human workers unnecessary for the company. Only in some design jobs are placed, where mankind is a necessary part of the process, and those places are manly in jobs where creativity is a key element for success in work and production's success. Robots are awesome says company's leader, because he or she must not recruit one single worker to that company.


This is a way what makes traditional work concept old fashion way to handle a business. That is the thing what our political leaders must understand. Companies can kick people off when they don't need them, but those kicked of persons will drop to society's price. State or government can't kick those persons somewhere. That's the difference between the company and public government. The only reason why the company exists is making the profit for it stakeholders and that's why robots are very popular in car factories.


Even if there will come sudden orders for that product's the company does not hire extra-workers. They just give orders to manufacturing robots to increase the production and that means that there will not open new workplaces. This is a key in "neutron bomb phenomenon". Even if the economic situation turns to fast rise it doesn't mean new workplaces. This is what has been happening in the USA and many other countries. Production increases but none workers will hire. The worker in the industrial hall is an army of robots, what made human workers unnecessary for company.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/