Philosophers are always professional thinkers

Philosopher Sokrates
(Picture I)

http://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/p/philosophers-are-always-professional.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The thinking is a good way to show the existence of the thinker self, and thinking about things makes days better. But if we want to know about the thoughts, and get feedback are they good or bad, those thoughts can be published. If the person has thoughts, what is somehow bad, that can be told to other people. Otherwise, they might see the philosopher as the person, who lays on the sofa and writes something with the laptop computer. This action is called the modeling of the thinking process, and it's very important part of the day of the philosopher, who seems to do nothing.


Doing something is the key element to making people suitable for the social group of the normal citizens. his is the reason, why philosopher wants to think every single thing in the world. The reason, why some people think that thinking is somehow a bad thing, is sometimes so shy, that they believe, that their opinions are making somebody laugh. But in the world, we must understand that there are not bad opinions, there are only opinions.


And opinion is one way to think. Today I read from the media, that Finnish minister of defense told that civilians should not involve the chose of the next fighter- or multirole system, what the Air Force would choose. Here I must say that statement is somehow the little bit interesting, because if some writings or opinions are meant nothing, why they should be commented by using very strong arguments?


 If somebody writes something unprofessional in the net, who cares about them? There are many texts in the world, where is not head or tail, and there would be no comments about them. If somebody writes, that Ferrari is better than Lamborghini, we ever ask have this kind of writer ever driven each of those cars. So why some fighters cause very strong argumentation?


The thinking is the key to existence, and publicising those texts is the way to tell to other persons, that the writer exists. That is the problem with existence. René Descartes wrote and published his texts because he wanted to be somebody for other people. And I think that this man was cursed, that maybe his friends ever listened what he said. There are many people, who think, that they want to be like Descartes, but there is one thing, what differentiates this kind persons from normal people.


This is the things, what they want to say and share with other people. Normal people would not sometimes want to listen to the thoughts of thinking and existence, even they are told about the great philosophers like René Descartes. That is the reason, why Descartes wrote the texts to some statements. Philosophers are professional thinkers, who believe, that everybody must have the chance to read their texts and thoughts.



But if they are not interested, would the reading be voluntary made action, and that time the man can spend as an example of snow cleaning. Descartes had right to tell others his opinions, and he had right to expect that somebody would listen to his worlds. Then he started to write those texts because texts are visible to everyone. And they could read in the noisy environment. That has brought much incredible wisdom in the eyes of humans, who enjoy reading those persons like Descartes thoughts in the home or library.

Picture I


https://i.pinimg.com/736x/33/d6/28/33d628b3f97cee65677e7fa4301a3104--classical-period-su.jpg

Free your mind, and think free, it is the key to the real philosophy

Ancient Greek temple at Paestum
(Picture I)

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/free-your-mind-and-think-free-it-is-key.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

In the beginning, I must say that we haven't got a single hard evidence about the advanced technical civilizations, what has lived on Earth before human race has started to dominate the world. Here I must mention, that, of course, there is a story like Plato's "Atlantis", where is mentioned that there have been secret cities what were populated by people, who had squamous skin.

Sometimes I think that maybe Plato wrote pure fiction, and the story of the powerful state, known as "Atlantis" was pure science fiction. In that case, this Mr. Plato, of course, decorated the story more attractive, and he told the story about the "Egyptian priest" who told that first. In the time of Plato people were traveled so much as today, and the "Egyptian priest" was the person, who gave this story the taste of exoticism. And maybe Plato heard that story from some storyteller in some theater, and he made own version of this very popular story.

In fact, the size of Atlantis was not very big, the size of the city-area itself was about 5000 square meters, and I thought that maybe that if Atlantis existed, would Plato make it much bigger, what it was before he got that story. And of course Plato wanted to show his patriotism and the story, how Athens troops won that city were told only for decorating that story and make it more pleasant for the people, who controlled Athens in that time. But there is another kind of things, what people should think before they justify anything. It is possible to make diving suits by using the skin of Catfish or Shark. Other ways are using the greased leather, what also keeps the person dry.

Also, it is possible to dive very long time by using the bottle, where is carbon filter on it. In this case, the "long time" means longer than without that equipment, what is used in World War II submarines to escape and evasion system. But we don't know did those ancient Mediterranean civilizations knew that carbon would clean the air. When we are thinking about technically advanced civilizations, we must understand one thing. In that time about 500 years, B.C. was almost everything what was more complicated that stone-axes technically advanced.

Maybe some city-state holds the techniques like the balloon flight by using heat air balloons. Normally there is a very big mistake, what people normally make when they are talking about advanced civilizations. They think that those ancient civilizations had all technology, what we have today. People don't think simple things, like heat air balloons, what are made by using the natural material. They don't also think that big fishes like sharks tails can also use as the swimming equipment. In this case, the swimmer just pulls the sharks tail like pants and uses that thing as the swim fin.

So in those cases, the ancient Greeks just saw something, what they were not seen before. The dry suits might be very fascinated in the eyes of the Ancient Greeks. But this is only thinking about technical advantages from the long time ago. And when we are looking those stories, we must understand that they were been made better during the history. The last versions of the story of Atlantis might be made under the control of propaganda leader of Nazi-Germany Dr. Joseph Goebbels, who wanted to rewrite history, that it was supporting the propaganda of "white race".

And in that case, the Nazis saw themselves as the descendants of those "White Aryan race", what was living in the Atlantis. This is one perspective for the ancient mythology. It has been always modified to serve the purpose of governments. In the case of stories of ancient Greeks, the background of those very patriotic tales can be found from British headquarters in World War I, what wanted to rise the nationalism in Greece.

The British empire was in the war against Turkey, and in that time Greece was part of Ottoman Empire, and that's why British interest was established revolt in Greece. Of course, that nation must be proud of it's past and that's why British propaganda makers made those stories more patriotic than they ever were because in this case, Greeks must feel that Turkish were tramped the rights of a great nation of Greece. And the reason for that just made the revolt in that area, what was important for Ottomans and Austrians, because that place was the point, what was controlling sea route to the Mediterranean sea, and warships must pass that area if they wanted to leave to sea.

In that case, British commanders thought that the revolt was more easily to establish in Greece than Istanbul, what was in Turkish mainland. The British army needed also supporting area, what might use in the strike against the city of Istanbul. But that plan ever made in action, because the Ottoman Empire falls for internal reasons. This is very interesting part of history, what was rewritten for serving the national interests. And we must understand that when we are reading the texts of ancient philosophers. And at the last, I must ask one question about the ancient civilizations: "have you ever met any ancient Greek, who told that there is no hidden civilization on Earth"?

This is the very good aspect of discussions about ancient civilizations. We haven't met any ancient Greek, and even we meet some person from that era, that person can tell lies to us. But maybe those ancient wise men had created the method how to fix our DNA, or they have put their diary in the place, where it was not destroyed. But as I told you the diary can also be faked by some members of British Headquarters in 1916. Or this can be made by some antique dealer in 1992 when he tried to sell that thing to some person, who wanted to show that Ancient advanced civilizations were true.

Sources:

https://www.facebook.com/ursary/posts/1990076197682916

Picture I

http://www.touropia.com/famous-greek-temples/

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/free-your-mind-and-think-free-it-is-key.html

Is the man a thinking machine without any feelings?

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/is-man-thinking-machine-without-any.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/is-man-thinking-machine-without-any.html

About the writings of the philosopher's texts and the stories, what is told about those people

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/about-writings-of-philosophers-texts.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/about-writings-of-philosophers-texts.html