The new evidence of the existence of Planet X

"An artist’s conception of Planet 9, or Planet X, which scientists theorize orbits in the distant solar system. Image credit: Robin Dienel/ Carnegie Institution of Washington" (NASA)

Planet X is never seen. That is one of the things that we should realize. Planet X is the mysterious gravitational effect at the edge of our solar system. The existence of that object is almost confirmed in one day. And some other day that strange thing doesn’t exist anymore. The thing that makes it very interesting is that the gravitational effect that makes Neptune’s trajectory wobble and the mysterious X-ray flares in Uranus are things that can cause many speculations. 

And one of them is that. There is a planet that is colder than the plasma around the sun. If the planet’s temperature is lower than the heliopause’s temperature and the planet’s trajectory is outside that point, this kind of object can be very hard to detect. The prediction is this, if Planet X really exists it would be geologically dead. It could be the rogue planet that our sun or the outer planets Neptune and Uranus are trapped near the edge of the solar system. It’s possible that this mysterious gravitational object has gone out from the solar system’s gravitational pool. And turned into a rogue planet. 

Uranus’s X-ray flares. 

Dwarf planet Haumea with Rings and its two moons Hiʻiaka (Haumea 1) and Namaka (Haumea 2). 

Artist impression of Quaoar rings. Credit: Paris Observatory

Artist's impression of Quaoar with its ring and its moon Weywot

The primordial black hole hypothesis. 

But there is also the possibility that Planet X is something like a black hole. In some scenarios, a very small black hole can pull a shell around it. In some models, the small black hole can exist in asteroid-size objects. Or even on some planets. The small black hole must only pull dust or ice around it symmetrically. If those particles are locked around that black hole they can form a structure that looks like a regular planet. So could some of the dwarf planets in the Kuiper belt be that mysterious Planet X? 

There is one object that can be interesting about the researchers. That object is the dwarf planet Quaoar. The thing that makes that dwarf planet very interesting is its ring system. That dwarf planet should have a very weak gravity. Sometimes astronomers and I thought that some kind of plasma whirling around that small dwarf planet makes the Van Allen-belt type magnetic phenomenon that can trap the low-energy plasma that comes from the sun. Another remarkable thing is that Quaoar has a moon called Weywot. And if that artist’s impression is right, that means that this moon is quite a long distance from Quaoar. 

The third interesting thing is that the Quaoar’s temperature is 41 K which is -231.3C. There is suspicion that some kind of radioactive process warms the Quaoar. But the primordial black hole can explain that temperature. 

But there is one very wild idea. Could Quaoar be the primordial black hole that formed the ice shell around it? Maybe that thing seems very rare, or radical theory. But if the planet X is some kind of primordial black hole, can that thing be some dwarf planet that we already know? That primordial black hole can seem very innocent if it's in some dwarf planet. And then we can look at another dwarf planet: Haumea. An interesting thing is that Haumea has two moons. 

When we look at images of Haumea we see that the little world with two moons is stretched. Haumea itself looks like an egg. That thing can happen because of the fast spin. Or it can happen because some force from that thing stretches the Haumea. Those two moons should destroy Haumea’s ring system. The names of those moons are Hiʻiaka (Haumea 1) and Namaka (Haumea 2)

The primordial black hole that is in the stable trajectory and pulls particle shells around it can be very hard to separate from the real dwarf planets. If there are no objects near that thing, we cannot measure the object’s mass using those things. If that black hole pulls all dust from around it. That thing prevents astronomers from seeing dust clouds from around it. 

https://astrobites.org/2025/04/28/vulcan-pbh/

https://www.astronomy.com/science/is-planet-nine-a-black-hole-or-a-planet-harvard-scientists-suggest-a-way-to-find-out/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/49910160

https://www.buffalo.edu/news/releases/2024/12/primordial-black-holes-may-be-hiding-in-planets-or-even-everyday-objects-here-on-Earth.html

https://chandra.harvard.edu/blog/node/786

https://nasaspacenews.com/2025/04/black-holes-from-the-big-bang-could-be-trapped-inside-our-planet/

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/07/were-seeing-something-massive-out-there-astronomers-detect-possible-ninth-planet-beyond-neptune-in-chilling-new-discovery/

https://scitechdaily.com/dark-matters-secret-hideouts-are-primordial-black-holes-lurking-nearby/

https://www.space.com/primordial-black-holes-cat-big-bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haumea

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hi%CA%BBiaka_(moon)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namaka_(moon)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaoar

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weywot

The new type of gravitational waves might detect by using the new sensor.

The gravitational waves are proven that the gravitation is wave movement like all other three fundamental interactions are. There is the possibility that the wave-particle duality is also working with this force. And if researchers can prove that thing. That proves the existence of graviton.  But the problem is that gravitational waves are so weak effect. That even detect them is hard. The observable gravitation waves are born only in the highest energetic reactions in the universe. 

The weakness of gravitational waves means that the gravitons that are the hypothetical transportation particles of the gravitation are also very small or unique-sized particles. 

Or are the gravitons the form of the primordial black holes? Which means they would be the energy centers without a particular form.  

Are those missing gravitons the particles that formed just after the Big Bang? 

Otherwise saying, those small transportation particles of the gravitation could be the particles. That formed just after the Big Bang. Straight from the radiation or wave movement. So are those almost proven gravitons the first particles that formed in the universe? 

If gravitons size is small enough that means no antenna can resonate with gravitons. And if graviton is a very low energetic particle it cannot interact along with other particles. If the mass or energy of the impacting particle that impacts with graviton is too high, that covers the impact. 

The speed and mass and energy level of the particle must be just right. That the graviton interaction can be detected. The thing is that the particle that moves with the right speed and has the right energy level can collect enough gravitons that it can affect its trajectory. The idea is that the graviton cloud near the moving particle can change its trajectory. Before they are hitting it. 

So is the anomaly of the Muon g-2 experiment the reason for the graviton cloud? Another question is, could the fifth force and dark energy be the same thing?

Gravitation is the weakest of four fundamental interactions. And the hypothetical graviton is introduced as the gate for the fifth force. The fifth force is predicted to be even weaker than gravitation. But the thing is that Muon g-2 experiments have shown that the fifth interaction might be stronger than the gravitation. And the thing that shows that is the strange curving of the muon in the low energetic particle accelerator. 

But there can be another explanation for that curving. And that thing is that those particles were interacting with the dark energy. Many people including myself, think that dark energy is the wave movement like other interactions are. And that brings one question to my mind. Is dark energy the same thing as the fifth force? 

The reason why I think that thing is that all other fundamental interactions are wave-particle dualities. There are wave movement and particle forms of all other fundamental interactions. And the missing thing is the graviton. If researchers can isolate graviton or turn gravitation waves into gravitons. That thing helps to focus the form of gravitation itself. 

()https://www.iflscience.com/physics/experimental-detector-may-have-spotted-a-new-type-of-gravitational-waves/

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

Image():https://www.iflscience.com/physics/experimental-detector-may-have-spotted-a-new-type-of-gravitational-waves/

()https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/