What was before the Big Bang (Part II)

 What was before the Big Bang. (Part II)

"Our universe could be the mirror image of an antimatter universe extending backwards in time. Groundbreaking research suggests that our universe has an antiuniverse twin. Physicists in Canada propose that our universe could be a reflection of an antimatter universe that existed before the Big Bang." (CREDIT: Getty Images)" The brighter side, Groundbreaking research suggests that our universe has an antiuniverse twin)

The antiuniverse or antiverse is the model. That is based on the supernova explosion model. When a large star explodes, that event forms a so-called time-glass nebula. So, could the Big Bang event have formed the two universes? The idea is that when two giant whirls. That spin was opposite. Those giant whirls formed the spark, or the explosion that sent two universes into different directions. If those proto-anti-universe and the proto-universe impacted. That could form the universe and the anti-universe. 

This question is one of the most interesting, because it helps researchers to calculate the values of the particles.  When a particle travels through the universe. Energy and quantum fields touch it. Those touches leave marks on those particles. And that helps to get information from distant galaxies. But this is not possible. If researchers don’t know the strength of those energy fields. This means that modeling the Big Bang makes it possible to calculate changes in the energy levels in an expanding universe. 

  

What energy should be in those particles that exist in the modern universe? 

And if researchers can calculate. What kind of energy should those particles have? They can search for differences between theoretical and real values. That gives data about the fields. That the particle faced. During its journey.  But it’s impossible to calculate theoretical values without knowing the beginning values. 

Was there some kind of energy flow that formed two opposite rotating whirls that were positive and negative (+ and -) universes? And was the Big Bang some kind of spark between those giant whirls?  That doesn’t mean that antiversum and universe require material. They require opposite fields that cause a similar reaction to the antimatter-matter annihilation. 

In some models, the energy arrow that traveled through the field formed two giant whirls. Those whirls can be the anti-universe and the universe. Or, those whirls were the positive and negative whirls. If those two positive and negative proto-universes act like matter and antimatter. They can pull each other together. 

Above: Time glass nebula. 

So can the antiverse explain the Big Bang? 

In this case, we should rather talk about the antiverse. As a mirror universe. Or, mirror protouniverse . Where there was some kind of material. We could say that in the case of the proto-universe, the antiversum was rather the whirl where energy fields rotate in the opposite direction. Than the other universe that we can call the “normal universe”. If the proto-universe and proto-anti-universe were oppositely rotating whirls in the energy field or in free gravitational wave movement. We can think that those whirls pulled each other together like antimatter and matter. Pulled each other together. 

It’s possible that those extremely large rotational whirls impact each other, and they formed the lightning or the spark. That spark could be like a shortcut between positive and negative fields, and that spark could be the thing that we can call the universe. When the Big Bang happened. Energy was homogenously spread through the entire universe. Then the universe's expansion made holes. In that homogenous energy field. And that caused situations where energy started to fill those holes. 

Could dark energy or some part of dark energy form when quarks or gluons collide with their antimatter pairs? That thing can mean that this kind of thing can put energy into moving. 

Can black holes’ relativistic jets be formed from new fermions in the universe? When we talk about black holes and their relativistic jets, they can form fermion-anti-fermion pairs. That means that effect condenses energy fields into the form of matter. That means if Schwinger effect forms matter in the modern universe, that thing forms fermion-antifermion pairs. And those particle-antiparticle pairs can annihilate, transforming into energy. So could dark energy’s source be in the quark and anti-quark annihilation? Or in some more exotic particles, annihilation, like the gluon-antigluon annihilation. 

This can mean that energy, or wave movement that travels into those energy holes, is stated to fill those holes, and the Schwinger effect could form material in those whirls. Some of those whirls could be so strong that the wave movement formed different-sized primordial black holes. The question is always. Do black holes' relativistic jets form new particles in the universe? Relativistic jets are the most powerful things in the universe. Because black holes also interact with dark matter and dark energy. That means a black hole can form two relativistic jets, visible and dark energy jets.    

When dark energy jets travel through the universe, they can turn dark energy fields into some kind of particles. The changes in dark energy could form. When dark energy turns into some kind of particles. When we think about the nature of energy, matter is one of the forms of energy. Particles are energy packages. When energy binds itself into matter or particles, that means that energy is away from its environment. 

https://www.thebrighterside.news/post/groundbreaking-research-suggests-that-our-universe-has-an-antiuniverse-twin/

https://phys.org/news/2024-06-partner-anti-universe-expansion-dark.amp

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brane_cosmology

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwinger_effect

Time and the Big Bang theory.

Time and the Big Bang theory. 

Maurits Escher's portrait "Ascending and Descending" can introduce a situation where particles move between energy levels. When another particle moves up, that pushes another particle to move into a lower energy level. If two particles move up and one particle is between them, they move that one particle back or to a lower energy level faster. 

So if the case is this. When one particle moves one energy step up. The neighbour particle must move one step down.. And, if that particle is between two particles that move one step up. That particle that goes down should move two steps down. 

The reason for that is this: when one particle moves into an upper energy level, it gets that energy from the particle that moves to the lower energy level. And if the particle "wants" to push two particles to the upper energy level, it must release twice as much energy as one particle requires. In the same way, if two particles step down in the energy level and there is a particle between them, that causes a situation where those two particles release energy. They push the particle between them two steps higher. 

In one dark energy model. The reason for dark energy is that some particles just release their energy too fast. The idea is similar to the waterfall. When water drops from the slopes, it forms a sound when it hits the bottom. That sound forms when water releases its energy. The fact is that water releases part of its energy into the air. While water molecules travel in the air, they form friction. 

And that friction means that water released some part of its kinetic energy. Transforms into thermal energy. But what if water falls in the vacuum? In that case, falling water would not release its kinetic energy to the air. That means water transfers more kinetic energy to the bottom. And that means water would be at a higher energy level than it would be if it traveled through the air. 

Energy requires a place where it can move. When a particle travels through the universe, it interacts with its environment. That means a particle receives or releases energy. If a particle cannot transfer its energy to somewhere, like another particle or a quantum field, it remains higher energy than it should be. 

Can that thing be the evidence of the wormholes? The wormhole would not let the particle release its energy. And that can explain why some particles are at a higher energy level than calculated. The reason for that higher energy level can be that the particle traveled across the magnetic storm. And that tells us that the sun's magnetic storms can load more energy into particles than they should carry. 

But when a particle comes out from that magnetic effect, it causes a situation where energy flows faster from those particles than it should. In the same way, when particles come out of the hypothetical wormhole, that means they are at a higher energy level than they should be. And that causes a similar situation. The particle releases its energy faster than it should. That kind of effect can rip particles into pieces. 

Above: "A depiction of a universe-antiuniverse pair. Credit: Wikipedia, CC" (Phys.org, New model suggests partner anti-universe could explain accelerated expansion without the need for dark energy)

The Big Bang was an event, or a series of events. Big Bang released into time. The idea of that model is this. There are four dimensions: three in space and two in time. The Schwinger effect formed matter straight from wave movement. Before the Big Bang, there was wave movement. Or, some quantum points, or quantum dots, in that spacetime. It's possible that those quantum dots were small whirls in the starting field. Then those quantum dots started to assemble a wave movement around them.

It's possible that the event that formed the universe actually formed two universes. There is a formed universe where we live. And the universe, there at least, is the mirror. So, in the anti-universe, the matter is antimatter, but some cosmologists believe that time also moves oppositely. 

The Universe formed from a starting field that could be the gravitational wave movement fields. When we think about a model, the Schwinger effect or quantum whirls form the universe. We can think of a situation. There was a fast-moving energy impulse, or energy arrow, that traveled through the starting field. That energy arrow should form two arrows. And this model supports the antiverse model. 

Or in some other models, the quantum dots moved away. From each other because of some quantum mechanical impact. That thing moved quantum fields away from each other. And then they tried to fill that hole. This means that the starting field started to form. A tower-type structure, and sooner or later, that field couldn't keep the tower in its form. That collapse was the thing. Called the Big Bang.  Or it started a series of events that we call the Big Bang. 

There is a model that the spacetime is actually formed of the internally traveling time arrows. Time moves forward at the outer layer of that time arrow. The internal structure of the time arrow moves backward in time. The idea is that. We live in the third dimension, and the material's base energy level. At the quantum state is a 2D material. This forms the second dimension. Energy travels out from the material. 

Above: Waterfall. The sound of falling water forms when water releases its kinetic energy. (Pinterest)

This means. The material turns into a "flat" form. Or the material turns into a 2D form.  So the form of the universe can be a giant sobrero. There is a similar structure. Like a plasma impact wave that surrounds our solar system, we cannot get information from outside the universe. That shockwave formed during the Big Bang travels at the forward edge of the universe. And it denies getting information from outside the universe. There can also be a gravity wave traveling ahead of the Universe, that closes the universe inside the gravity sphere. And it also denies gravity observations from outside the universe. 

But let's go back. The internal time arrows. The idea is this. When the time arrow, or arrow of time, moves forward, it pushes things around it back in time. There is a possibility that the universe or material is the structure that acts as a hollow time arrow. The hollow time arrow forms when the edges of the structure travel forward in time. And they push their internal structures back in time. 

This model can work with the 3D spacetime model. If there is a structure, then the outer edge pushes energy into the middle of it, which means that the energy falls straight into the second dimension. That causes an effect where energy starts to spread around. But because there is a structure that transports energy into that point, the structure forms the standing wave into the second dimension. That means. There forms the structure. That looks like a volcano. Energy falls in the middle of it. 

That wave movement releases energy. That energy impacts the energy that comes outside, which starts to raise the structure's energy level. And because that field travels up those fields, it binds energy into them. The outside energy impacts the inner structure, which transmits energy to the second dimension. And that forms the energy trap or standing wave around the structure. The standing wave's energy level rises outward, or the inward field gives in and falls on the structure. 

https://phys.org/news/2024-06-partner-anti-universe-expansion-dark.html

https://scitechdaily.com/what-if-the-big-bang-wasnt-the-beginning-supercomputers-search-for-clues/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time

String theory and material.

"Six-dimensional shapes called Calabi-Yau manifolds (3D slices of which are shown here) come in increasingly complicated varieties. In string theory, a microscopic manifold lies at every point in our 4D universe and determines the laws of physics we experience." (QuantaMagazine)

Think about the ring that stands and spins around its axle. That object seems like a ball. In string theory, all material is formed of strings. Think about the ring that stands and spins around its axle. That object seems like a ball. In string theory, all material is formed of strings. Those strings can stretch if they get energy from outside. They can turn into spirals and turn around each other. They can also wrap around themselves and each other. Those strings can form tunnels where energy moves from one place to another. 

In this model, the material is the string that looks like a ring spins around its standing axle. That standing axle is another string. The quantum-low pressure locks the ring around that axle. The axle is colder than the ring and that connects the ring-shaped string into it. In the same way standing, and spinning strings look like the ball, because it spins so fast. That means the 3D structure in the material is only virtual. The thing that keeps this structure stable is the tornado-shaped energy field that conducts energy out from the particle in the middle of it. 

So, that thin energy field forms the axle that connects the ring-shaped energy field into it. The idea is that the tornado must not go through that ring. An energy tornado is like a screw that transports energy out of the structure. The ring-shaped energy field stays standing because there is a small weak point in the electromagnetic field around that quantum tornado. 

If that effect happens between molecules we can say that there is an electromagnetic low pressure. That pulls the ring-shaped energy field against that energy tornado. The energy tornado pulls energy out from the ring. That turns smaller. When that ring turns smaller the outcoming energy, or quantum field tries to fill that place. In that case, the ring-shaped energy field sings like some spring.  If the material is the standing ring that spins around the metal stick that explains also dark energy and dark matter. 

That means the particle wobbles back and forth. Because the ring-shaped energy field is not straight it wobbles. The effect is similar as we would put the ring to spin in a position that it will not be standing straight. There is the possibility that the particle, or energy ring spins half-lying position. That means the dark matter can be the string that's half-laying. The dark energy can be the radiation that comes from the point where the energy tornado hits the energy field. That causes quantum friction which sends wave movement from that point in elementary particles. 

**************

In the string model material is like a ring-shaped string that spins around the vertical axle. That axle is the quantum tornado that transports energy out from the middle of the structure. Because that ring-shaped energy field spins so fast it seems like a ball. And that means the particle's 3D structure is virtual. 

In the same way, we see a spinning ring that stands and spins around its vertical axle as a ball. We see the material as a ball. The thing is that if that energy tornado cannot transport energy out from the structure. The energy will break the ring. So, a stable black hole can form only in the case, where the energy can travel out from it. 

Or strings can bind energy into the spinning movement. The thing that destroys black holes and other material is the free energy, not energy, that is connected into its structure. The problem is that the structure’s energy level cannot rise endlessly. When the structure’s energy level turns higher than its environment it starts to send energy, or anneal. Energy cannot stay in place. It always moves to a lower energy level.

If we think that superstrings bind energy, their energy level rises. And then some of those strings get lower energy levels. That makes energy move between these strings. That causes giant energy turbulence that rips the structure open. When those energy strings send energy they form empty space. That increases entropy in the system. And then sooner or later, some of the superstrings cut or form a hole in the black hole structure. That releases energy against outer strings at a very high speed. That energy wave breaks those strings. 

*********'

String theory also explains the existence of the universe like this. Before the Big Bang event. There formed a ring-shaped energy field that started to pack energy inside it. Because that ring- or wheel-shaped string started to spin around its vertical axle and its energy level was higher than the field inside it, that field started to pack energy into one point. The wheel or ring can pack energy until its energy level turns lower than the field inside it. 

That happens when the string's size turns larger and it cannot harness energy from outside. If a string pulls energy from inside it that causes a low energy area near it. The idea is that the field inside that string is actually, many internal strings. And then some of the strings inside that giant ring-shaped steering string cut. 

That causes energy flow against that string. The effect of energy depends on the area and the speed of the energy effect. The small-diameter bullet penetrates the target better than large diameter bullet if the energy that it sends is the same because its impact area is smaller. And that a small bullet transports more energy at its impact point than a large bullet. 

The nuclear bomb and nuclear power plant involve as much energy. The thing that makes the nuclear bomb more devastating is simple. The nuclear bomb releases its energy in a nanosecond. The nuclear plant uses months or years to release that energy. 

The problem is that the string itself cannot turn larger and keep its energy level stable. 

Because the law of conservation of mass and energy means that the string cannot form energy from emptiness. Mass can change into energy and energy can turn into mass. When it expands there is less energy for its area. When the string's energy level decreases, energy from inside breaks out. 

So, where does that energy ring come from? The natural explanation could be the Phoenix Universe or some other universe. The energy stick that travels through the quantum field can make ring-shaped energy fields like when we throw a stick into water. 

When we use things called earthing we conduct electricity to ground. The thing that turns electricity harmless is it travels into such a large object that its level turns low. The electricity itself doesn't go anywhere. It just travels to such a large object that its level turns so low, that we cannot feel it. So the same energy level or energy mass, if we compare the energy with water can turn devastating, if it's in a small object there it is released very fast. In small-area objects, the fall-altitude of energy is higher than in large-area objects. 

Theoretically it is possible that we can carry electricity in the large plates and then focus that energy on the small plate. The problem is that the energy level in a small object is higher. So we must make a system that pulls energy into the smaller plate from the back of that plate. Another thing is that the energy can travel from a larger area to a smaller area only if the larger area has a higher energy level than the small particle. 

The answer to that question can be a large energy pump that pulls energy out from the back of the smaller particle. The energy flow that comes from the front loads energy to that particle that is between the energy pump and the energy source. This energy makes the star's anneal brighter near black holes. 

https://cerncourier.com/a/testing-times-for-strings/

https://www.quantamagazine.org/ai-starts-to-sift-through-string-theorys-near-endless-possibilities-20240423/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

Gravitational waves or ripples in spacetime could point to the place of the Big Bang.

 

The point where the Big Bang happened should be in the middle of the universe. But the fact is that is the exact point. Where the Big Bang happened could also be moved. Or the universe around that point is moved asymmetrically. The idea is that some remnant of the Big Bang is a supermassive black hole. 

And that remnant involves information about the Big Bang itself. But the problem is that we should find the first black hole that formed just after the Big Bang. That is a very difficult thing to do in real life. All black holes look similar. 

So researchers should find the right black hole. And then they could listen to the echoes from the universe's first moments. The thing is that the first gravitational waves. That left from the Big Bang traveling the outside the edge of the universe. The shockwave that formed in the Big Bang can call, as the "edge of the universe". When we are thinking about the form of the most outpoint of the universe there should be a small density to another point in the universe. 

Because the front of the material is traveling the shockwave there is a gravitational wave. That thing makes the edge of the universe a little bit thicker than the material behind that wave. But there is the possibility that we could see the remnant of the Big Bang by using another method.  There is a possibility. 

That the same part of the radiation that the source is in the Big Bang jumps inside the universe. Black holes can turn the direction of gravitational waves. But there is a possibility that the black holes were far behind the gravitational waves. and even if gravitational radiation jumps between black holes we should have some method to separate those gravitational waves from disturbing gravitational waves, that are released later. The problem with this kind of research. is how to find the right gravitational waves. 

https://shorttextsofoldscholars.blogspot.com/

The universe expands, but the expansion rate is not accelerating.

The acceleration speed of the universe is constant Between 45 and 50 km/s/Mpc. The speed of acceleration doesn't increase. And that is interesting. Because when an object's distance increases gravitational interaction between them turns weaker. And that means the acceleration speed should increase. 

So what does this mean? Is in the middle of the universe some kind of dominating gravitational effect, like an extremely large black hole? Or some yet unknown gravitational effect that stays at a stable distance from galaxies. And that causes a question: is there some kind of yet unknown layer inside the universe? 

There is another interesting detail about the speed of light in the universe. The speed of light is the cosmic constant that is stable in a vacuum. But different mediums are affecting that speed. So if light travels through some structures, it slows light. So could there be some kind of structure that causes errors in redshift? 

But one of the most interesting questions in the universe is where all its material is gone. Today universe has much fewer atoms than in the young universe. There was no dark energy at all in 380 000 years old universe. So where does dark energy come from? This is one of the most interesting questions in cosmology. 

If we think that quantum vaporization is the reason that dark energy or free energy started to affect and dominate the system. We must also understand that energy doesn't come from anything. 

If we think that dark energy is the result of hypothetical dark matter particles turning to wave motion we can think that dark matter and visible matter both have cosmic inflation. But does cosmic inflation affect differently to dark matter and visible matter? Or does cosmic inflation time different in dark matter and dark energy? 

The Big Bang is normally oversimplified. The Big Bang is the event or series of events where the universe began. 

Cosmic expansion is an interesting thing. If we think that all material in the universe came from a single point called the Big Bang we are oversimplifying that effect. If the Schwinger effect formed the universe it could form two universes our universe and the antiuniverse. In the antiuniverse, time goes like in our universe. But the difference between those universes is that in antiuniverse protons are negative. And electrons are positive. 

So the real name for the hypothetical antiuniverse is the antimaterial universe. The reason why somebody believes that thing is in Schwinger effect. When crossing wave movement turns to particles, the Schwinger-effect forms particle-antiparticle pair. If the energy level of that effect is high enough it pushes those particles and their anti-particle pairs so far away that they are not returning together. 

If those particle-antiparticle pairs touch each other the result is annihilation. Those particles and their anti-particle pairs turn back to radiation. So, were there some yet unknown particles in the young universe that do not exist anymore? When we think about the form of the Big Bang, we must realize that the biggest question is where all material of that event came from. If the universe's origin was the Schwinger effect, there must be some origin for the wave motion. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/universe-expansion-not-accelerating/

https://plancksatellite.org.uk/science/timeline/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwinger_effect

https://shorttextsofoldscholars.blogspot.com/

Big Bang and 2-dimensional structure

If gravitational waves can form a quantum tornado. That thing can pull gravitational waves from both sides of that gravitational tornado. This causes the impact of the gravitational waves in the middle of that structure. 

The thing called an artificial black hole that is the hole in the 2D atomic structure can make the fundamental way to exchange information in the quantum computer. There is a possibility. The two of those holes would connect by using the "8"-shaped energy tape. 

This thing would not connect those electron holes themselves. It can connect the edges of those electron holes. 

And that thing can make the revolution in quantum computing. But that same thing can open the secrets of what the cosmos looked like before the Big Bang. 

The idea of this hypothesis is that before the Big Bag cosmos was 2D-structure. And then part of that structure reached an energy level that turned it into 3D. So the material turned to 3rd. dimensional. That caused things that the 3D material couldn't exchange information with the 2D universe. When the material's energy level rose that caused the hole in the 2nd. dimension. 

When a material jumps to a higher dimension. Its energy level increases so high that it cannot interact with the lower dimensions. So is a Black Hole a 4-dimensional structure? That means it's like an electron hole in the universe. 

The time before the Big Bang is a mystery even for cosmologists, and all known wave motion and material were released to 3D spacetime when the Big Bang happened. There is the possibility that before the Big Bang universe or space was a 2D layer. Then there formed a hole in that layer because a small part of that space got an energy load that turned it into the 3D structure. So that thing forms a hole in that 2D layer.  

When energy started to fill that hole from the side caused the formation of an energy tower in that hole. Then the energy that jumped out from that pike formed the quantum ring around that hole. That formed the standing wave around the hole. And for traveling over that wall or quantum ring the wave motion started to jump to the tower that started to rotate. 

Then that channel or quantum tornado started to pull the 2D wave motion inside it from both sides of that thing. And suddenly the energy level of that tower was so high that the 2D layer cannot keep it in form. That caused the energy tower to collapse. And it sends wave motion over the just-born universe. 

We can only say that somewhere came some kind of wave motion. That formed the universe. In some visions, the thing that formed Big Bang was the gravitational tower that formed the tornado-shaped wave motion structure. That gravitational or wave-motion tornado created a situation where two wave-motion packages impacted in the middle of that tornado causing a thing called the Big Bang. 

The Big Bang was the sudden energy impulse that was sent through the universe. If that thing formed when the bubble of material and energy turned to 3-dimensional. That thing can explain a thing called dark energy.

We are talking about dimensions like 2nd., 3rd. or 4th. the dimension, we should think that the higher dimension is the energy level that forms from the lower dimensions. So that means when the 3rd. dimension separated from the 2nd. dimension. 

It lost its ability to exchange information with that lower dimension. That thing formed the hole in that dimension. Same way when the energy level of the particle or object rises high enough it jumps to the 4th. dimension, or otherwise saying, it loses its ability to exchange information between that particle and three-dimensional spacetime. 

Image: 

https://www.businessinsider.com/ligo-astronomy-using-gravitational-waves-2016-9?ref=yfp?r=UK&IR=T

Can we rule out the Big Bang?

 

The Big Bang was the case, where matter got its form. So it was the beginning of spacetime or was it? Was there dark matter before the universe? 

Unknown things like dark matter and dark energy are causing questions about the universe's begin. In some models, the Big Bang was the case when the dark matter took the shape of visible material. And that thing makes the Big Bang a very interesting thing. Because if that is true the Big Bang was the case where one form of the material turned into another. 

The thing, that makes the Big Bang mysterious is that matter cannot form from emptiness. The Schwinger effect where matter forms from the wave motion, require that the wave motion exists. And there must be some kind of source for the wave motion. 

The Schwinger effect requires that two quantum- or electromagnetic fields are impacting together or some force turns the superstrings turn into a ball-shaped thing. A superstring is a thin quantum field that is traveling in space. The Schwinger model means that the material cannot be without wave motion. And wave motion cannot be without ball-shaped particles. 

The Schwinger effect means wave motion and particles are two sides of each other. So wave motion and particles are the same things. And the thing that makes the Schwinger model very creepy is that the Schwinger effect always forms particles and is anti-particle. So if the Schwinger effect forms the universe, that forms two universes. 

If we think that the black hole turns into an X- or gamma-ray pulsar. It means that its rotational axle turns similar to neutron stars or pulsars. That thing forms an X- or gamma-ray pulsar. If the black hole's rotation axle turns to its equator and the polar spin continues that black hole starts to act like a pulsar. 

But the energy level of that kind of pulsar is much higher than regular pulsars. That thing can form the case where the Schwinger effect can form a material that we cannot see. The idea is that there is a small area in the black hole where is no gravitation. And if the quantum bridge crosses that area the black hole can start to cross its nucleus. 

And then that bridge makes wave motion travel through the black hole. The idea is that the fast rotation motion along with extremely high centripetal force. Make that string antenna that conducts energy out from the black hole. The fact is that the universe is the combination of at least two main quantum systems. The invisible system and the visible system. Or actually, there are at least three different quantum systems. 

*Dark energy: an invisible wave motion. That rips the universe into pieces.

*Dark matter: an invisible gravitational effect. The thing that forms dark matter is unknown. There is suspicion that those things could be some kind of virtual particles. 

*Visible material and wave motion. Those things are forming the visible universe. 

So if dark matter is the virtual particles or so-called wormholes that thing causes an interesting idea. Is the cosmic web the dark matter? If those strings are forming because of the cosmic vacuum channel that explains the dark interaction. In that model, fast-moving particles like electrons can form the electromagnetic- or quantum vacuum tunnel. 

The idea is when an electron moves very fast it pushes quantum fields from its route. In the case, where the second electron follows the first one very close the quantum channel cannot be closed. And if the quantum whirl starts to rotate around that channel, that thing causes the situation where that quantum channel cannot fill. So that thing is called a wormhole if it's true. 

The role of dark matter is one of the things that is interesting. Dark matter is the gravitational effect. That is the only thing that we know about its shape. 

There is a possibility. That dark matter is the virtual particle. That hypothetical virtual particle forms when extremely fast spinning particles are starting to expand. 

When non-elementary particles like hadron spin. The outer quarks move outside from the center quark. That thing expands the length of the quantum tunnels between quarks. And then those quantum bridges are acting like antennas that are harvesting more energy levels to those particles. And that means the energy level and weight of the particles of that fast-spinning hadrons are turning higher. And that material is only too heavy. 

Or there is forming some kind of quantum bubble. Where the energy level or temperature is lower than the temperature of that particle is lower than the environment where they are. If dark matter is a matter that temperature is lower than the cosmic background or even lower than zero kelvin we cannot see that material. 

Or if we think that dark matter is an extremely fast-spinning electron there is a possibility that there are forming holes in that quantum field. In that case, the lower energy bubble pulls energy inside it. And that means if that kind of bubble is stable. It will pull radiation inside it. So that outcoming radiation will keep dwarf galaxies in their form. 

The idea of cosmic inflation is forming the theory that the universe is in a cosmic vacuum. That means energy travels from the higher energy universe to space around it. This thing means that cosmic inflation is the energy flow out from a bubble where all visible material exists. 

https://scitechdaily.com/can-cosmic-inflation-and-the-big-bang-be-ruled-out/

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

Schwinger effect and the Big Bang

1.) The cosmic gamma-ray background

The idea of the Big Bang is that material formed from nothing. And maybe the Big Bang was a giant Schwinger effect where a strong electric field formed material. 

The idea of the so-called Schwinger effect is that material is formed because of the strong electromagnetic field. And the thing is that the wave-particle duality supports that theory. 

Before we will go to analyze the Big Bang more carefully we must understand one thing. The first thing that formed in the Big Bang was two opposite polar electromagnetic fields. Then those electromagnetic fields traveled through each other. And then that case where two electromagnetic fields crossed each other. Wave-particle duality formed the first particle pars. 

Those pairs were particle-antiparticle pairs that were annihilated. That radiation formed the first quark-gluon plasma. The idea of the Schwinger effect is that when electromagnetic fields form material. There is always particle-antiparticle pair. 

When we are looking at the cosmic gamma-ray image that is over this text, we can see that gamma rays are coming from a belt-like structure. And that thing means that there could be two energy rays that traveled through the universe. 

If we are thinking about the animation in the next image there is a possibility that when the high energy electromagnetic fields traveled through each other those fields started to push the particles and antiparticles ahead of them. Or maybe those particles traveled behind those two fields. 

2.) "As illustrated here, particle-antiparticle pairs normally pop out of the quantum vacuum as a consequences of Heisenberg uncertainty. In the presence of a strong enough electric field, however, these pairs can be ripped apart in opposite directions, causing them to be unable to reannihilate and forcing them to become real: at the expense of energy from the underlying electric field. We do not understand why the zero-point energy of space has the non-zero value that it does." (BigThink.com/70-year-old quantum prediction comes true, as something is created from nothing)

That thing could form an electromagnetic vacuum. Or a channel where quantum fields were extremely weak. Then that vacuum adjusted the energy level of particles around it. So that channel can be one reason why the universe is like we see it. 

There is introduced an idea. That the oppositely shot particles can use to adjust the size of quarks and that thing can make it possible to create low-energy areas in the material. Those two particles can be used to transfer energy away from the structure. So that thing can make the ultimate stealth possible. 

3.) Casimir forces on parallel plates

Casimir effect. 

"In quantum field theory, the Casimir effect is a physical force acting on the macroscopic boundaries of a confined space. Which arises from the quantum fluctuations of the field. It is named after the Dutch physicist Hendrik Casimir, who predicted the effect of electromagnetic systems in 1948". (Wikipedia, Casimir effect) 

Sometimes is introduced that those two electromagnetic fields acted like Casimir plates. The Casimir effect creates virtual particles between two plates that are very close to each other. Sometimes is introduced that the Casimir effect makes energy from emptiness. 

Well, the Casimir effect doesn't create energy from emptiness. The idea is that when two plates are extremely close to each other the movement of electrons creates a bubble in the quantum fields of atoms. Then another quantum field or radiation affects that bubble increasing its power. Or maybe there is forming a curved electromagnetic field between Casimir plates. When outcoming radiation hits that bubble it aims that radiation at the plates. 

Of course, the electron can also jump over the plate. And in that case wave motion pumps energy to that thing. Or electrons can send photon quantum. This effect is interesting because it can use to create energy also in dark places. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwinger_effect

Image: 

Image 1: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/GLAST/news/gamma-ray-census.html

Image 2:) https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/something-from-nothing/

Image 3:) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect

Penrose tiling and what is their relationship with the universe?

How was quark-gluon plasma turned into the material? 

Penrose tiling is the geometrical structure where are no two similar images. Or otherwise saying,  Penrose tilings are the nonsequential way to cover the area by using nonsequential polygons. 

Penrose tiling is one way the mathematical or geometrical-mathematical introduction to the universe. The universe started to expand just after the Big Bang. The form of material and its relationship with wave motion changes all the time. 

The universe is cooling all the time. And that means the energy or energy level of wave motion that impacts the material is always different. So the material that formed at the beginning of the universe is not ever the same twice. 

Material can look the same if we are in the universe at a certain time. But if we could go back in time and we could remain at the same energy level as we are in the moment when we went on our time trip we might not see the universe at all. 

But to make sure that thing is real, we must make time travel. And then we must separate ourselves from the quantum system called the universe. When the universe expands the space grows according to the material. That thing means that the distance of particles is growing all the time. 

That thing makes the gravitational effect weaker. And that thing is one of the most fascinating things in cosmology. That expansion causes that material is turning to wave motion. That wave motion pushes particles away from each other. 

Maybe the source of the dark is the vaporization of gluons. Gluons are the particles that transport a strong nuclear interaction. Those particles are also turning wave motion when the universe expands. 

Image 2. The explosion of the hydrogen bomb. There is the possibility that the quark-gluon plasma traveled like the ring around the Big Bang. And there is the possibility that the visible material formed inside that ring. 

In that case, the quark-gluon plasma turned back to wave motion at the outer and inner edges of that plasma ring.  And then, the wave-particle duality turns that wave motion to the visible material. This thing explains why there is so little visible material in the universe. 

Could dark matter and dark energy be the reason that there are some yet unknown particles?

Could those dark particles be some kind of material that releases before and after the visible material? Or let's take small rewind. 

When Big Bang released wave motion that turned to particles the wave motion was extremely hot. The first material formed quark-gluon plasma. The energy levels in that plasma were not the same. At the edge of that plasma. The wave motion traveled outside that entirety. The quark-gluon plasma acted like the ring that formed around the cloud of the nuclear weapon. That ring is the forming when the heat wave travels away from the explosion point. 

When the Big Bang happened and the quark-gluon plasma started to form that plasma should form the ring-shaped structure like hydrogen bomb forms. 

And there was the energy that traveled in the middle of that intensively heated plasma ring. That means. Also, the inner edge of that plasma turned back to the wave motion. And that brings one idea to my mind. Is visible material the result of that radiation? 

So the wave motion that once turned particles turned back to wave motion at both edges of that extremely hot plasma. That wave motion traveled outside that plasma ring. And another wave motion front traveled inside that plasma ring. The temperature in the middle of that plasma was so hot that it turned quarks also back to wave motion. 

But energy traveled straight out from the middle of that super hot young universe. And the material must turn thinner. And the temperature must get lower so that the hadrons can form. There is the possibility that the energy reflected from the expanding disk of the quark-gluon plasma formed the visible material.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose_tiling

Does time exist?

In some models, time is like some kind of wave motion. Everything that we see happened in the past. So if time is wave motion or some kind of river. That explains why we can see only the past. If we think that the energy level in the past is higher than future. We have a hard-to-send wave motion against that flow. 

If we are raising our energy levels we will make the difference in those two energy levels smaller. And that makes the river of time move slower. So if we want to see to future we must make energy level of some point in future higher than the point where we are. 

The reason, why we see things that happened in the past is that the energy level in the past was higher than it's now and future. Even a microsecond and shorter time units are time. So what would we need to do that we could see to the future? The answer is that we must send wave motion against the flow of that river.

 And that means we must make two points at two different times. And then we must make information travel between those points. Then we must rise the energy level of the point, in the future to higher than the energy level of the point in the past. But that is only a hypothesis. 

But how big a role cosmic inflation plays in time? We know that we can stop time in particles. We can deny them aging by making them travel with the speed that is the speed of light. But the problem is that we cannot stop the aging process perfectly by accelerating particles. The reason for that is that nothing can reach the speed of a photon. And that means that even at the highest possible speed some photons are escaping from the object. So that means we can make particles younger than they should but we cannot stop aging. Or can we? 

By thinking otherwise the speed of light is quite easy to cross. We must just think of speed as energy level. But we can think of the speed of light as a relative thing. We can make an electron travel faster than it travels in the medium by using a vacuum. 

And when an electron reaches its maximum speed in particle accelerators we can simply shoot it into water There it sends the blue light flash when it removes its kinetic energy. And that flash can turn other particles into higher energy levels. That thing makes those particles younger until they released their extra energy into the environment. 

By stabilizing the higher energy level and making particles younger the system must get outside energy stress that increases the energy level of the quantum system. But when the energy stress ends those particles send extra energy outside them in the form of radiation quantum. 

In this text, we are talking about the thing that affects also space. In that case, time is a real thing that affects both matter and the environment. We certainly know that time is not a ringing alarm clock that wakes us in the morning. The time is the loss of energy in cosmic inflation. When the universe expands that causes the particles are vaporizing or turn to wave faster and faster.

When the universe expands the space expands, and the number of particles is the same all the time. So the distance of the particles will turn longer and longer. 

That thing makes that quantum fields will not push particles with the same strength. And that thing causes that material turns to waves faster and faster. So the interesting thing about this model is that speed of light is always getting higher and higher. When things like photons will impact quantum fields their kinetic energy will be higher than the photons in the past. But otherwise, photons should travel through the quantum fields so that it gets more energy. 

But the thing is that all energy and material were released in the Big Bang. The Big Bang was the thing where material reached the energy level that it turned to the third dimension. The dimension is the energy level of material or wave motion. So there is one interesting theorem about time.

That theorem goes like that this is some kind of radiation. In the young universe, time moved extremely slowly. The energy level of that intensive plasma was very high. And that means the vaporization of the material was very slow.  That means time has a connection with energy. The form of time is a mystery. Even if we know that time is connected with particles and particle-wave duality we don't know if is time some kind of wave motion. If time is some kind of wave motion there is the possibility to travel back in time. 

https://scitechdaily.com/does-time-exist-how-do-we-know/

Was the Big Bang exist or not?

We should describe the Big Bang as the moment when the material was released into three-dimensional spacetime. Or otherwise saying we should say that during the Big Bang the material took shape, as we know it. The question is where does that material come from?

Of course, it came out from some kind of singularity. But where did that singularity come from? The Big Bang was the beginning of material, but it was not the beginning of space. 

Reality is a form of wave motion that can form particles. And particles can turn to wave motion. This is called wave-particle duality, but wave motion or particles cannot form from nothingness. There are introduced things like multiverse theory and phoenix universe theory. But they do not answer where the first galaxy came from. 

The next part is an oversimplified model of the Big Bang theory. And as you will see there are a lot of weaknesses in that model. Things like collisions of galaxies mean that the distance of every galaxy does not increase. 

Since it was introduced. The Big Bang Theory dominated physics and astronomy along with cosmology.  The theory goes like this. All material and energy in our universe formed in a great explosion called "The Big Bang" and the thing that supports this theory is an expansion of the universe. 

The distance between all galaxies seems to expand. And that thing should prove the existence of the Big Bang. But if we think like this we would think wrong. We would bypass things like collisions of galaxies and other things like the geometrical shape of the universe. 

If we see the shape of the visible universe as the ball where the Big Bang was in the middle of it we would face a situation where galaxies on another side of the universe seem the same size as galaxies near us. 

The thing is that if we would live in the ball-shaped form.  The Big Bang happened in the middle of that ball, and we would see the galaxy that is on another side of that ball. If we want to compare the Big Bang with nuclear explosions. We might think, that there is a great void or some kind of vacuum in the middle of the universe. 

That vacuum or void causes the scattering and quantum fields are not slowing particles like they are doing outside that void. So when light travels through this kind of void. That is similar to Boötes void its trajectory turns. 

When a photon travels through that vacuum or void it loses less energy than it should. Or the energy or wave motion will release only backward to that photon. Energy can travel between quantum systems only if those quantum systems can interact with each other. 

And the Big Bang point would be in the middle of us and that another galaxy. That means that our distance to the point where the Big Bang happened is the same as both galaxies.

The shape of the visible universe seems to be a ball. But there is the possibility that dark matter changes the model of the universe's geometry differently. 

Dark matter is the strange gravitational effect in the universe. There is made lots of work with this material. And some people believe that dark matter is the virtual gravitational effect that is forming because the impacting gravitational waves are rising higher. 

There is the possibility that dark matter is the virtual material that forms this gravitational effect. The virtual gravitational effect could mean that gravitational waves that are impacting each other will rise higher. So that thing causes a similar gravitational effect as so-called real particles. But virtual particles are acting like normal particles. 

Material and wave motion cannot form from emptiness. 

The biggest weakness in the Big Bang theory is where the matter which formed the universe came from. Big Bang was an event that released material and energy to third-dimensional spacetime. So the Big Bang was the event where the energy level of the material reached a certain level. 

Even in the simplest models of the Big Bang Theory material was released in space. So the Big Bang was the event where material reached the energy level that anchors it in the third dimension. In some visions, the giant singularity erupted and released material that formed the universe. But then again, where did that singularity come from? 

In some other versions, the material fell from the fourth dimension and released the electromagnetic pressure wall that formed material in the form as we know it. But that thing requires that there is some kind of wave motion in the third dimension. And that causes a similar question again: where did that wave motion come from? 

Were there other places in space where material fell from the fourth dimension? Falling from the fourth dimension means that material would start to lose energy so fast that the fourth dimension's quantum fields cannot replace it.  In that theory, the dimensions are only energy levels where the size of the particles and their oscillation are different. So that thing makes this material that is at higher energy level unable to interact with lower energy level material. 

The weakness of all models of the beginning of the universe is that they don't answer the question of what was before that mysterious event called the Big Bang. There is the possibility that the crossing wave motion causes an effect called "wave-particle duality". That means impacting wave motion forms quarks and gluons. And then those elementary particles turn into more complicated particles. The problem is where that wave motion came from. 

In some theories, the impacting wave motion turned to the particle. And in total emptiness were no quantum fields that can limit the expansion of that particle or its quantum field.  And that expanding quantum field formed whirls that turned into elementary particles. 

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20220105-what-existed-before-the-big-bang

https://www.livescience.com/65254-what-happened-before-big-big.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bo%C3%B6tes_void

Is the universe infinite or not?

When something has begun, that thing must also have an end. So for being infinite the universe must have no beginning. So sometimes people misunderstand that space and the universe are the same. The universe is the bubble where all material that we can touch is. 

Or at least it supposes to be in that bubble. And the space is the dimension where that bubble hovers. But the fact is that we don't simply know many things that we expected. When we face things like the Big Bang theory we oversimplify that thing. We say that Big Bang released all material into the universe. But we are not sure about that thing. 

The thing is that the material of the universe has limits. The limit is the distance between two first photons that are released from the Big Bang. Those photons are traveling faster than other photons. The fact is that information itself cannot be destroyed. So information that formed the universe stays forever. But that's the only thing that we know. There is the suggestion that information is one state of matter. 

And the fact is that wave movement can transport information. Along with wave-particle duality, that thing means that wave movement is also one state of matter. But can the information be separate from wave movement and particles? Does it have a form that is separated from the wave movement and particle? The superstring is the shape of wave movement that can turn into a yarn ball called an elementary particle. 

There are at least four major elements in the universe. 

1) Material

2) Energy in the form of wave movement

3) Dark matter (There is the possibility that there are actually at least two forms of dark matter)

4) Dark energy

We think that dark energy is wave movement. The origin of that wave movement is in the unknown particles. Those particles could be hypothetical gravitations. And we might think that the gravitons are the particles that particle-wave duality forms when gravitational waves are crossing. So that means there is the possibility that dark matter is forming all the time from the crossing gravitational waves of the black holes. 

We see about 15% about the material. And then we must understand that most of the universe is wave movement called dark energy. So there is a possibility that dark matter is released in a different place than visible material. Dark matter can be the thing that is released from the cold Big Bang. That means dark matter erupted before visible material during the Big Bang. 

Or dark matter existed before the Big Bang. There is a theory, that dark matter is the remnant of past universes. And the multiverse theory explains that thing. But then we are facing one of the most interesting questions about multiverse theory. The main question about that theory is. Of course, where and when was the first universe born? And where it takes its material or wave movement that formed the first universe. 

The thing is that there is always the ultimate end or ultimate fate of the universe. The ultimate fate of the universe is the Big Crunch. Or the Big Silence. The Big Crunch means that the universe drops into a black hole. And the Big Silence means that the universe continues its expansion forever. 

The thing is that the spherical universe is the only thing that can fall. If the universe is flat or hyperbolic its ultimate fate is big silence where all particles turn to wave movement that continues forever. Sometimes researchers think that the hyperbolic flat universe is more comfortable because they are closing the phoenix universes away. The Big Crunch or big slurp means that the entire material of the universe falls into the giant black hole. And then the quantum field around it is removed. And that thing causes the new Big Bang. 

But in the case of the Big Silence, the wave movement continues forever. The thing is that the Big Silence is the thing that happens in stages. When the expansion of the universe continues, the existence of material is ending. The final stars detonate, and the only things that are existed are neutron stars and black holes. 

Gravitation is interacting from extremely long distances because there are no disturbing things. And then black holes are eating each other and neutron stars. When there is no radiation the quantum fields around black holes are gone. And then those black holes are starting to erupt causing similar effects to the Big Bang. So there is the possibility that new universes are forming in that case. When the gravitational waves are crossing around the space. 

Then we must realize that information that exists in that wave movement is forever. Those wave movement bites are turning almost straight. And then they have all information that was in the universe. And maybe some of those waves are impacting some other waves. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/universe-infinite/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

Could the Schwinger effect explain the Big Bang?

The Schwinger effect is the effect that turns wave movement into particles. The Schwinger effect always forms particle-antiparticle pair.  As you see from the GIF above this text the wave movement is splitting into two parts when it faces the vacuum bubble. 

Then those waves movements that are coming from different directions are hitting together. When two wave movement flows are hitting together at a straight angle that thing forms the particles. 

The origin of the neutrinos can also be in the Schwinger effect. In that model, the electromagnetic wave movement would turn to particle form. When it hits the magnetic field of the star. 

Somebody is an introduced theory.  Maybe, someday researchers can foom particles form in the laboratory by using the Schwinger effect. If the light or some other electromagnetic wave movement is jumping between two mirrors that thing can form particles. 

But as you see from the GIF a similar effect is seen in the black holes. So is it possible that black holes also turn wave movement into particles? The light or some other electromagnetic wave movement would travel to both poles of the black hole. There they face extremely powerful X- or gamma-ray pike. And that pike can turn wave movement to yarn ball. 

In that case, the Schwinger effect always forms particles. And their antiparticle pair. So if we are thinking that the Big Bang was some kind of Schwinger effect that means there could be two wave movement beams. Those wave movement beams would go around the quantum vacuum. And then two particle groups formed. That particle groups were particles and their antiparticles. 

If the size of that quantum vacuum was high enough. That thing makes it possible that there are formed two universes. Or universe and the antimatter universe. But if those impacts of wave movement happened close enough the electromagnetic pulling effect will pull particles and their antiparticles together. Causing an annihilation reaction. 

The Dark Big Bang (or Two-staged Big Bang) theory goes like this:

1) At the first formed groups of particles. The particles and their anti- or mirror particles.

2)  After that began the annihilation that formed the proto-material like quarks and other fermions. Those particles formed in the scattering where crossing wave movements turned to yarn balls that are called fermions. 

Theoretically, the reason why wave movement is not traveling across the quantum bubble. Is that it needs a quantum layer where it travels. The material can cross the quantum vacuum only in the particle form. The reason for that is that. Wave movement requires some kind of layer that carries that thing. We can call that layer a brane layer. If there is not that kind of brane layer. That means the wave movement would curve to yarn ball or simple particle form. 

Or otherwise, it's possible that. If the wave movement crosses the quantum vacuum it faces the quantum wall and turns to particles. That thing can be the origin of the universe. But where do those wave movements come from? Who knows? Maybe there are other universes.  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwinger_effect

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

Can the brane theory explain the Big Bang?

 

 

The image that I just put in the last text is introducing the hypothetical point of the Big Bang. Can that mysterious explosion be formed when two branes are touching each other? That means that the Big Bang was the giant electric arc. 

The biggest question in the Big Bang theory is where the material or energy formed? The wave movement can turn to the particle. But where did that wave movement come from? Was there some kind of white hole that brought the wave movement to the third dimension? 

To turn wave movement into a particle is possible. But it requires that the lines of wave movements are crossing. And that requires that there are two sources for wave movement. 

And that thing could cause the wave movement to turn to material in the form that we know it. There is the possibility that the extremely high-energy explosion can push the quantum fields away from each other. And that thing causes the zero-energy conditions at that point. 

When we are thinking of the dimensions as the energy levels. That causes the possibility. That material would travel from the fourth and the second dimension to that bubble where those materials impact. 

The impact between those different material states would be extremely rough. And that caused the wave movement started to flow to the third dimension. This thing caused this wave movement impact with straight superstrings and caused the formation of the material. 

The idea is that we are living in the third dimension. In the second dimension, the material is "flat". It has length and width. In the third dimension, the material has also depth. And the fourth dimension means that the material has a form that cannot model to the third dimension. 

Dark matter would be a material that has a different energy state than visible material. That means dark matter would be closer to the fourth and the second dimensions. The idea is that the particles would not suddenly transform to the four- or two-dimensional. The material would slide to another dimension. If we think like this: another dimension is the state of energy that we cannot observe. 

In that model, the fourth dimension is in a higher energy level than the third dimension. And the second dimension is the lower energy state than the third dimension.

When the material stabilized in a certain dimension. It starts to release its energy. And then it falls through dimensions. The material releases its energy. Until it reaches the same energy level as its environment has. When the energy level of the material is higher energy flows to the environment. And things like the expansion of the universe mean that the energy level of the environment is decreasing. 

In the same way, we cannot model 3D structures in two-dimensional layers. In the same way, the fourth dimension is impossible to model in a 3D universe. 

The brane theory explains the material and its relationship with the fourth dimension. That material is not suddenly turned four-dimensional. The material would slide to the fourth dimension. The interaction between the particle that is locked in the third dimension and the particle that is sliding to the fourth dimension just turns weaker and weaker. The thing that causes sliding to another dimension is the energy load or energy release. 

When the distance of the energy level or the state of those two particles is turning higher. That causes the other particle is sliding to the fourth dimension. And sooner or later that particle slides out from the sight. That means the state of dark matter would be the state of the material that is far away from the visible material. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brane

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brane_cosmology

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-dimensional_space

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

Big Bang and beyond.

 Big Bang and beyond.

So what kind of case the Big Bang was? Was it the release of the subatomic particles from the erupting black hole? In that scenario, energy started to flow away from that Black Hole because it was higher energetic than its environment. 

And energy is flowing to the lower energy areas. The question is: did the Big Bang release material to the universe. Did it turn the existing material into another? And which way did energy flow travel if that thing happened? 

The thing is that energy is always traveling to the lower energetic areas. So the energy balance between the matter and the environment determines which way energy flows. 

If the environment is lower energetic than material energy travels from the material to the environment. And if the material is lower energetic than its environment energy travels to the material. Energy flow continues until the energy levels between particles. The environment is the same. 

Another thing could be that the Big Bang was the energy eruption that pumped energy to the particles that were already existed in the universe. In that case, the energy load from the Big Bang simply turned some particles of dark matter into matter that has formed, as we know it.

The thing is that if we would be formed of dark matter. We would see an empty bubble in the point of our universe. The thing is that we don't know which thing was the Big Bang, except it released the material in the universe. But was it released material or just changed the type of particles to another. 

So there is the third version of the Big Bang theory. And that is that. The energy level of the material that existed near the epicenter of the Big Bang loosed energy. That means the Big Bang formed the empty bubble in the universe. If the big bang released energy flow that pushed the universe empty. That thing could cause that the matter near that bubble lost its energy. 

And then part of the energy of the dark matter traveled in that bubble. Then that thing caused that the energy level of those particles decreased, and the size of those particles changed. That thing could explain. The reason why the form of visible material of the universe looks like a ball. 

What if we would live in a young universe? How long it would take to travel across the universe? The thing is that. If we would live in the young universe there be more scattering and quantum fields so the speed of light would be lower than in the modern universe. Another thing is that the size of particles would be different. And that means there is the possibility that travel across the young and smaller universe takes as long as it takes today. 

The thing is that the energy level of the young universe is higher than the universe that we are seeing. Another thing is that there was more crossing radiation and the material is releasing energy slower the level of single particles than it does now. But the universe itself as an entirety transmitted energy faster outside it than it does today. Today the temperature of the universe is three kelvin. 

And the cosmic background is one of the reasons why the universe is expanding. When the edge of the universe is traveling outside the energy level of the universe is turning lower. That expansion causes that it's not possible to get the energy stability between material and its environment as long the expansion continues. The energy flow from material to the environment is the thing that causes the end of the universe. But if the universe starts to come down its energy level starts to rise. 

And sooner or later the energy is starting to flow back to particles. The thing that determines the direction of the energy flow is the energy level. Energy always travels to low energetic areas as I wrote earlier?

Maybe scientists are making the first direct observation about dark energy quite soon.

All energy must have a source. Any energy is not forming from emptiness. The wave-particle duality means the energy or wave movement can turn to particles. And otherwise, the particle can turn to energy.  One of the sources of energy is the particles that are slowing. When the particle is slowing it must transfer the kinetic energy to somewhere. 

And that transfer happens in the form of wave movement. The thing that makes energy visible has an opponent in the structure. The energy that is sent by a certain size particle makes the same-size particle resonate. And that resonance is making the radiation or wave movement visible. If there is no opponent for sending particles the wave movement that those particles send is unable or very hard to detect. 

That means the dark energy could be the radiation that source is in unique size of particles. When those particles interact with each other they are causing the gravitational effect with those individual particles and particles of the visible material.

Dark energy means the wave movement that is invisible to us. Sometimes there is introduced an idea. That part of that energy is coming out from free quarks or neutrinos. The idea of that theory is when a quark or neutrino is traveling outside the visible universe there is a gravitational effect that starts to slow that particle. 

When that particle is slowing it sends wave movement that is hard to detect because the sending particle is so small. So could the origin of some part of dark energy be some extremely small particles like quarks, neutrinos, or even Higgs bosons or some still not known particles? 

Or is the source of dark energy in the interaction of the particles of dark matter? And are those invisible particles some very well-known particles? We don't have quarks or Higgs boson clouds in the visible universe. But outside the edge of the visible universe could be the conditions where those particles are free and outside the visible universe could be the Higgs boson clouds that are sending the emission radiation. 

In some theories, dark energy is coming from the very first particles released after the Big Bang. Those particles are traveling at the front of the bubble of visible material. And maybe some of them are starting to split. We have seen when neutrons are splitting. But same way, sooner or later the quarks and neutrinos are turning to wave movement or splitting. And in that process is releasing the wave movement. So could the part of dark energy come from splitting neutrinos that exist outside the visible material? 

Before visible material is released or protons or neutrons started to form the material was in the form of quarks. During the Big Bang released quarks and antiquarks. So if there was some kind of great annihilation after the Big Bang. That annihilation happened between quark and antiquark and electron and positron pairs. Maybe during that process formed some still unknown particles. Those particles would travel ahead of the visible material. 

And maybe some of those particles are turning to wave movement outside the visible material. And that thing releases energy in the form of wave movement. 

We know that dark energy exists. We know that is wave movement which origin is somewhere. And maybe some of it comes from particles that are known. But which form is different than we know. We don't know how far the universe continues after the edge of the visible universe. The dark matter clouds can continue very far away from the visible material. 

And we don't know cases where the neutrinos or Higgs bosons are stopping in our universe. But when those particles fly outside the universe they would slow because of the gravitational effect. And outside the visible universe is possible to find things like stopped Higgs bosons and neutrinos. Even they have not existed in the space where we are living. 

The thing is that we should determine the direction where the dark energy travels. Does it pull or push the edge of the universe outside? The thing that makes this thing interesting does the dark energy travel through the visible universe. Or does it come from the center of the universe? 

If the source of dark energy is outside the visible universe we might think that dark energy is the wave movement that has an extremely short or long wavelength. So the wave movement travels through the visible universe and affects the particles that are at the opposite side of the bubble that we call the universe. 

The fact is that dark energy exists. And that means there must be some source for that mysterious thing that is even more dominating than dark matter. The source of the dark energy could be somewhere where we cannot even imagine. 

https://scitechdaily.com/a-particle-physics-experiment-may-have-directly-observed-dark-energy/

Newton's fractal and the origin of the universe

Above this text is the so-called "Newton's fractal". And now you might ask, what connections with some fractal has with the universe. The fractal is the geometrical form that is repeating forever. And if we can make the right fractal we could make the model of the entire universe. So if we could make the model of the galaxies or interplanetary nebulas. That means we could make the model of the direction of the energy flow. 

Or if that thing is not possible. We could make a model of how the galaxies and universe are advancing. Also, the fractals can be used for modeling weather or movements of gas masses in the atmosphere. But the more accurate models can make by using extremely large gas masses like entire galaxies. When the mass of the gas is rising. The accuracy of predictions of the movement of that gas is rising. 

But could "Newton's fractal" be the calculation that models the origin of the universe? That is a coincidence.

 But it's an interesting coincidence. Newton didn't know anything about this fractal. And still, that is giving many ideas about the origin of the material. 

When we are looking at that fractal there is the shape that seems coming from one point. There are two crossing forms. And that thing brings to my mind that could the origin of the universe be the two crossing wave movement areas?

Maybe, in the beginning, was formed expanding quantum field. That pushed the wave to move away from the point where it formed. And that thing caused the Big Bang. 

 In that scenario, the crossing wave movement turned to a "ball-shaped form", but what kind of wave movement it was? The wave movement before the universe or material entirety that we call the universe formed was not a waving movement. It was a straight moving wave movement. Those energy lines crossed and that caused the detonation. Sir Roger Penrose noticed that the black holes brought radiation from the ancient universes. And maybe that wave movement was coming from the universe that was gone. 

But what was the origin of the crossing wave movement? The simplest answer is that came from another dead universe. The wave-particle duality means that the material is particles but also they have wave movement form. Sharply saying protons and neutrons are part of the subgroup of hadrons called baryons. They are a group of quarks and gluons. So they are particle groups. 

There is one thing that we must remember. The wave-particle duality means that only elementary particles can change their form between particle and wave movement. So quarks, electrons, and other subatomic particles can turn to wave movement. But the quantum groups like protons and neutrons cannot do that thing. 

So if we want to send a qubit through the black hole we must try to make it by using quarks or electrons for that thing. The requirement is that the information could return.  Is that the form of the transmitter can return to its original form. And the elementary particles will not break when they are falling across the event horizon. The idea that a black hole crushes information includes many theories. But one is that the gravitation will break the protons and neutrons. In another version when the particles are coming out from the hypothetical wormhole. They are slowing. And that thing crushes the information. 

The hadrons like protons and neutrons are not like "balls" they might look a little bit like small bags where are balls inside them. Those "balls" are quarks". Or maybe if we are increasing accuracy that thing causes that we might see that even the quarks are not balls. They might look like waves if we are using enough high accuracy.

If we are looking at the impact theory where two crossing wave movements caused the reaction called Big Bang the wave-particle duality turned those wave movements to the material. Quarks were the first stable particles in the universe. Or the very first particles might be Higgs bosons or some even more high-energetic particles. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_particle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadron

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality