The information what is given about gangs might be different from the truth.

https://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

On YouTube have been some very interesting videos, where persons are using violence or try to escape from the police. There have been discussions about those films because those persons have been quite easy to identify.  When police or some other organization delivers information, the purpose of that is sometimes so innocent as people believe. In the cases, when information delivered as an example about robberies, the information about pillages might be wrong, because that is meant to cause argumentation in the gang.


So the pillage is sometimes told to be bigger, what it really is because in the mind of criminals want to put the idea, that somebody of them has stolen from that pillage.  When some state would underline the violence and influence of gangs, we must remember, that this kind of information could be delivered because violent groups wanted to show them existence more openly, and that helps police and other organizations take the control of those gangs more effectively. In the real world, the motorcycle gang headquarters is the very good place for getting information about the people, who want to hide some muscles for illegal business.


Also, the well-known members of that kind of organizations are a very good target for undercover surveillance teams, what are searching persons, who want to make business with that kind of groups. The information is the very powerful weapon, and if we are thinking about the situation, that somebody photographs motorcycle gangs, and delivers that information to YouTube, would that cause sleepless nights for somebody. If some underage person hangs with those persons, that information would come as a surprise for the parents, who might not be very proud of their children at that time, when they see, that they are hanging with those MC-members. The motorcycle clubs are not always criminal organizations, but that hobby is good cover for criminal activities.


Sometimes there have been claiming that the members of the motorcycle clubs have been yelled, that they don't want to be photographed. Here I must ask, why those persons hide their membership because they use those vests and other marks of that gang? So why they don't want to show their membership in some newspapers or other media? Is there something, what they want to hide.  And those metal parts can use as a cover for changing the deactivated weapons for functional versions. That kind of business is always prohibited in the law. When we are going to think about 3D printers and they use in illegal weapon production, we must understand that drug dealer and another kind of criminals normally use weapons, what they can throw away after shooting.


Those persons would not even want high-class military weapons, and they have used even flare guns in their actions. The flare pistol have loaded with shotgun ammunition, and it can use as the single shot weapon, and of course, that gun would be destroyed in that shot. But if somebody attacks against that defender, would the shotgun ammunition stop that attacker immediately. Of course, those rockets can also use against the attacker. And if the user was some drug dealer, must that gun throw away anyway, this is the problem with gangs. They use normally improvised weapons in their normal business and the assault rifles and another kind of weapons are reserved for the bosses and punishers. And that is the very interesting thing in the world of gangs.

The second civil war of the United States of America

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

So here is the time for some conspiracy stuff, and I decided to make this writing about the "second civil war in the USA". The civil war of the USA in 1861 to 1865 cost over 300 000 casualties and that war was one of the bloodiest in the history of that nation. Today we are concerning the freedom and our privacy, and we have almost forgotten one quite interesting idea of the civil war. When the Union won the war in 1860's there were claiming, that the Southern side of Confederate would try to make relevance in sometimes after the civil war.


 And here is the very interesting thing about that claim or rumor. What if there were another civil war in that nation? What if those politicians and military men were not told about that war to the people, and then nobody even knew about this internal conflict. This theory or story have been told to explain the time of the wild west, and maybe some parts of this story are true. But in the modern time is claiming that some internal groups of USA would want to begin the civil war, and then somebody got an idea, that why people should know about that kind of things? The only information, what is needed is, that somewhere is an armed person, who might be dangerous. This is the only information, what the law enforcement must know when they come to make arrests.


If somebody would serve in the some "shotgun company" in the middle west, why that person would not treat as the normal criminal? Why should every people know about that kind of persons political interests? When we are talking about terrorism, we are facing the fact, that why people should know about that organization? If the terrorist group is well known, it has more easy to recruit people, and here we are facing the question, what if the British have not mentioned IRA? Or newspapers would not be mentioned about the rebel of General Lee? And why that person's military rank mentioned? Why didn't they make that person the normal leader of the outlaw gang?


What if newspapers would not tell, that Lee had some political purposes, and if that man would be mentioned as the normal outlaw, who robbed banks or something? Would somebody join that rebel team? And if the IRA would not ever be mentioned, would anybody even know about that organization? This is the key in the stories about "The second civil war". If nobody ever knows about the rebellions, they would not join that force too easily. And maybe press have been censored the political aspects of the outlaw's actions in the Wild West in the 1880's? Who knows the truth?

Kleptomaniac is the ritual thief, but the thing what drives people to those actions is often hidden in the past

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/kleptomaniac-is-ritual-thief-but-thing.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/kleptomaniac-is-ritual-thief-but-thing.html

How behavior sciences helps to track of dangerous people from the community

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/how-behavior-sciences-helps-to-track-of.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/how-behavior-sciences-helps-to-track-of.html

Why media will handle only a negative part of the life?

Kimmo Huosionmaa


The problem with media is that there will ever be introduced an average person's life. A person who is the main character in documents and movies is always some kind of ultimate version of people what represented of some lifestyle, what is introduced in those programs. Do you think that Pablo Escobar is some kind of an average version of the drug dealer? That man had billions of cash, but does some so-called “street level"'drug dealer that kind of money, or does he even dream about that, when that person hangs around some shopping center and sells some crack-capsules. What made Escobar so frightening person, was his money.


He could hire mercenaries to support his reputation. But I always thought that Escobar was only a shield man for some other actors in that dirty business. If people have money, he could do almost everything, but if he want’s to hire a mercenary, must he have the right relationships. Nobody wants to get smoked that the person has been worked as a mercenary. That’s why they take jobs only from agents who they trust. And being mercenary in somewhere Africa is the little bit different than making murders in normal western State. If a person will smoke that he is an assassin, will he or she punish by the court of law? The line of that kind of people is extremely tough. Those prisoners ever get out from prison.


But in those cases like Escobar, we might see what is the direction, where media sometimes goes. I don't know why they are not writing about guys who were in gangs and after that, they began to live a normal life without any problems. Why the objective of those documents is always so negative? They always begin that kind of problems with interest, but soon after intros, the journalist really begins to show really bad attitude for that case. They just are beginning to find some errors in that case, and sometimes the information what has been given to people is very grotesque.


They bring in front of the public eye some that targets friends, who might be in jail. But they never tell to people, why those people were arrested and what was a crime, where convictions came. And of course, they never tell to people, how long those "criminals" were been in jail. Only thing what is mentioned, has been that those persons are convicted for some crimes. If we see that kind of journalism realistic, we must be naive.


There is always news where drug user brutally killed the people who helped them. But when we are taking a focus in those stories, we must realize that narcotics users might be very dangerous and unpredictable because they have hallucinations. But when we are talking about those cases, there have been only a couple of that kind of cases in the Europe. And didn't anyone told those people, that if somebody uses drugs, he might be blackmail by his fellows to let them in?


And why reporters only take this kind of crimes on the front pages of newspapers? In here I must ask, is the help what came to those persons so altruistic at all? Why they bought a cell phone to that guy? I know that these are the most brutal worlds, what anybody can write, but didn't anybody tell to those people, that money should ever give drug user or alcoholics. They just buy more drugs with that money. When narcotics control the person, he or she might not able to control his or her actions, and that's why those people might be dangerous. But why media tells stories about only those cases, what ended sadly way?

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/