A relationship between social and printed media

Kimmo Huosionmaa


When we are talking about trusted media, we must say that of course printed newspapers are very high ranking and professional way to make media, but in some cases that thing have been caused even genocides. The problem is that some dictators are used printed newspaper against their political oppositions. In those cases, the "faked news" are caused the persecutions and violence against persons, who have talked against the dictators. This is one way to say, that many times dangerous is use trusted media for getting power in the state. I mean here, that also printed media can be used as developing the faked news and lies for people.


And this kind of misuse of media is always very dangerous because people are always trusted the media. But when we are thinking about social media, what is very unreliable, we must see one thing. When we are walking on the street, we don't have to look Facebook all the time. And we can remove that application from the telephones. That means we can just watch that thing couple of times per day. And the problem with social media is of course that if the people would use that thing, they might uncover very big secrets, or what do you think that somebody would publish the images from the house, where is guns on the wall. That kind of things is very bad for public safety.


But when we are thinking the role of social media, we must not stare that all the time, and when we are talking about the use of social media, those applications are meant to use together. So the all writings should be published in WordPress or Blogger, and then the links can be shared on Facebook etc. If we are thinking about working day and social media, we must say that the time for social media can leave outside the working day, if that feels disturbing. But the use of social media sometimes uncovers the little secrets, like that some worker, who is claimed to be an engineer has no training or education at all.


This might cause the little bit embarrassing situation if some team leader has been played an engineer, and then the dirty secret would be uncovered. In that case, somebody might want to ask, "why that person has not done anything".  And of course, if somebody writes bullshit or prosecutes somebody without evidence, can this person take to court. This is one very complicated question of social media. Superiority has right to deny the use of social media in working time, but if there find the things that are illegal, that would make possible to prosecute this person in the courtroom.


Nobody wants to be the asshole in the eyes of the family, and that would be a reason why some directors are wanted to deny the use of social media. But sometimes the reason for denying the social media is more complicated. There are cases that some other reasons were behind the blocking the social media, and one of them is, that worker keeps sick leave, but then there would be the picture, where this person sits on the terrace and drinks beer. That would be little embarrassing thing.

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/about-relationship-about-social-and.html

Why somebody hates artists and especially painters?

"Scream" Edvard Munch
1893
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

All of us have different opinions, about the art. And we will not normally shoot those artists because of their work. If somebody will send artists to prisons because they paintings will not satisfy those persons, that will wake the investigators interested in those works. The reason for arresting of somebody because of some paintings seems quite small and strange for our democratic society. And if the painting is some kind of the political manifest, we must ask what makes it the political manifest?


Why the picture cause reaction, that some police-officers will come to artists home with sub-machine guns. Are those pictures some kind of danger for national security, and another question is, what means term "national security?". Is that the security of military industry? Or is it the national leader's personal security? And are the arrests made for hiding some leaders personal secrets, that they were in some places, where they were not? When we are observing person like Lev Trotsky, we must understand that this person was in New York during the Russian revolution in 1917.



And when we are thinking about the connection between Trotsky's place, where he stayed during the revolution and hate him, we must consider that maybe the reason for killing that man was, that somebody else was claimed, that he was with Trotsky in some very important place, and when Trotsky was in New York, that story was uncovered the lie. So did that revolution began too early, that the persons would not be in right places when the operation began. The revolution began too early in St. Petersburg, and the front was opposite direction, to what was planned. Maybe the leaders of the revolution thought that they will start to attack the Pacific coast of Russia to St. Petersburg and Moscow.

But the plans were not working because the people would start to hit the winter palace, and that caused the situation, that some key leaders were in wrong place.  And Lenin arrived in St. Petersburg after the revolution happened in that town. There was no evidence that Stalin ever was at the front, and he just claimed that he was the political prisoner. And the evidence was the prison card, what could be made by Okhrana, the Tsar's political police. And if Stalin was the agent of that organization, would that man be in trouble. He just claimed that he was the metal worker, who was the member of "secret communist cell".


But when we are looking about the "purges" what was me by him, this thing would get the different meaning, because GPU:s terror was targeted to metal industry and engineers who worked in there. So was Stalin hiding his past of the Okhrana's agent? This would explain, why this man hated those engineers. Because if Stalin ever was talked to real metal engineer about the things, what happened in the factory, this man would catch by lie, because if he was Okhrana's agent would this man know anything about the work in metal industry, and he would not know about the missions of the men, who work in there. And that would uncover the dirty secret about the man, what would cause death to him.


 When we are thinking of some portraits we must understand that if there were the landscape where some great battle was to happen, and some leader doesn't remember that or this person remembers a wrong place, that would be very destructive for the reputation of that person. Those leaders of the revolutions might make about the personal glories around them, and that's why they are so sharp about their reputation. And in the case of the Russian revolution, might be some fakes in those votes, about the leadership of the state.

Sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Trotsky

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Stalin

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purges_of_the_Communist_Party_of_the_Soviet_Union

Picture 1

https://www.rotadisi.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Munch-scream-Oslo.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/p/why-somebody-hates-artists-and.html