When humans are falling, robots are rising.

  

 When humans are falling, robots are rising.

The robot makers are saying that robots will take jobs from some people. And of course, that thing causes worries. But otherwise, we should think about what kind of jobs robots are taking from us? Are they jobs that are wanted or respected? 

Or would you do those jobs? The thing is that robots are a complicated thing in the environment and business infrastructure. And the fact is that robots are effective operators that can grow productivity to the highest possible levels.

Robots can operate without breaks, and they don't need salaries. And if the company uses only robots for a working process. That means it can make products with the lowest possible price. 

Because robots are not needed salaries or practice they can operate near the delivery area. And the thing is that the robot can make so many stages in work. That is stored in its memory. And those modules can be changed when the company wants. 

So that kind of company can minimize the salary and transport costs. That means it can make products with lower prices and that is a good weapon in competition. And even if the products that robots made, are not sold. The company can turn to make a new product right away. Or if there is a cut in production those robots can take into use immediately when the order is taken. The robots would not make strikes. And the only thing that is against them is that they are taking jobs from people. 

 But the problem is, what the people whose jobs the robots are taking would do? 

The problem is that those people would just get their salary in the form of social aid. But the low salaries in the sectors. Where robots are planned to use are causing that the people who are working in those works are unhappy. In this text, I write about normal working robots, which mission is to replace human workers in boring and low-paid jobs. The advancing robotics needs infrastructure that supports them. 

The infrastructure is, of course, the recharge points and wheel-change service. But the environment is also the thing that is between our ears. Things like attitudes are the things that are also belonging to infrastructure. The attitudes are the things that are making people select the politicians. And politicians are making the laws that are controlling the development of the systems. 

When Elon Musk wants to make more robots and use them for work, that is reserved for migrant workers the idea behind that thought is that there is a couple of things that people should understand. The thing is that when we are building more and more apartment buildings we need more and more cleaners. So where we can take those people? Do the native citizens willing to apply for those jobs? 

Or what kind of people is willing to apply for those jobs anyway? If the natives would not want to do them, there is possible to bring foreign workers to make those works. And when the contract is gone the migrant workers are going home. Then we might ask one very big question: what kind of people come from a foreign country to clean some apartment buildings? 

Or would you tell your children that their place in society is to work as a cleaner because we don't want robots or migrant workers?

Maybe some people must take that kind of job. But what is the price of the force? Do we want employees who are a couple of months in work and then they are gone? When a new applicant is hired, there it takes time to introduce and learn the jobs. And then after four months, the next worker is coming in. Is the work well-done if it is made by some person who has social problems? Or would the people who live in the house feel safe if their cleaners are full of tattoos?

Is the person happy if that worker knows that after a couple of months will wait for the new work application? There is the possibility that in those places was not even promised nothing more than 2-3 months.  But is this the thing that we want? Do we want there a large group of outcast people? 

https://networkedinternet.blogspot.com/

Why there are so many empty houses in the countryside?

Picture I

https://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Chancing of the economic structure is visible in the Finnish countryside. There are empty houses because farmers must be left the villages because their ranches were not profitable. But there is one thing, what I sometimes wonder, and that is, why those good-looking houses were left without use in the villages, and they would be destroyed by weather and mushrooms, what would rot entire structures of those houses. The question is, why those houses would not use as summer homes, or why they would not dissemble?


Those old houses, what are rotten in weather are dangerous because the people like children could go in there, and then the floors would collapse. When we are thinking about those fascinating places, we must notice, that there is sometimes the furniture and dishes inside, and that is quite interesting. Even the ranch is ended, would those equipment needed in the new house or flat, and why they were left in those houses?


The thing is that sometimes there is found even family photos, and that makes think, what kind of thing made those people leave that places,  and why they didn't take anything with them? Those houses are not connected with any criminal activities, and this makes them very interesting targets for speculations. If the people moved to the cities, why they left all their stuff behind them? At picture one (Picture I) is the house, where must be changed the roof just before those people left there.


And in the final chapter, I will say, that those empty houses are dangerous. Why people keep rotten houses in their yards? If some children will go into that house, it be would very dangerous, if the foot comes through the floor. This is very interesting detail in the Finnish countryside. Some people have very fine and beautiful houses, and their yards very well care. But there is some house, where have nobody even visited in decades if the condition of that building is noticed.

Picture II

Of course, those things are not my business. But if some children would get hurt because of that kind of houses, that would bring them to the newspapers. And if there is something to hide, that must be investigated very carefully. If somebody would leave all the stuff and family photos behind, would that be something very interesting? There is one very interesting and horrifying scenario, what people would probably don't want to hear about this kind of places.


I hope that would be only the production of my imagination. If Russian or German intelligence would be wanted to slip their man in the Finnish community, they must choose the right person. This person might be the man, who would be some soldier, who has lost the brother or who would not have contact with home from the Finnish side. After that, they must kill that person, and of course, his wife must be killed. And then their agent can come to the home ranch, what belonged to the dead man.


If our victim would not have many social contacts except the wife,  this operation would be succeeded. And if that couple would be no contacts with own families, this might open the road to evening school and then if that person would pass it, even to the top place of the Finnish societies and corporations. Sometimes I have thought that could this kind of agent get the place in the Parliament or supreme court. This might cause big damages for Finland. And I hope that this could be pure fiction.


There are many fictional books about this kind of operations, and sometimes I think, that could they be real in somehow? Or are they pure fiction? And that is the thing, what the only couple of men know in the world. I must write that thing like fiction because I'm not the head of CIA or KGB. But the possibility, that in the Kremlin or White House would sit the enemy agent is fascinating. And it was given themes for many spy books, what are, fictional stories about the case, where the president is working for opponent's intelligence.