Why we afraid artificial intelligence and new killer-drones?

(Picture I)

https://vapaaverkkojulkaiseminen.blogspot.com/p/why-we-afraid-artificial-intelligence.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This is a writing about the paradoxes of war and militarism. The militarism and war are things, what is strictly out from normal people head, and there are many things, why is not very tolerated to speak about the military systems. One of them is that the national security is limiting the comments about those things. And when we are looking very sharply to the militarism and army, we are seeing that our religion has been against violence in 2000 years, and we still fight together by using weapons.


And even if we are against violence, many people are getting their salary from military forces their equipment, and the weapons industry around them. War is good business for the weapon dealers, who offers more and more lethal and advanced weapons, what suits for many missions. Also, support equipment like GPS systems is a very good article, because the owner of those satellites can cut the location signals of those weapons, and that's why they cannot use against the deliverer of GPS-system, and that ties the clients more effectively to the influence of another actor in the field of international politics and strategies. Strategies have always depended on the politics, and that's why the political support for weapon trade is extremely important.

We must say that using killer-drones would create the military, where doesn't serve a single man. But here we must know, that if there would be autonomous killer robots, what replaces the places of the military personnel, we would come to the situation, that there would be no work for the men, who serve in those military forces. And one of the first group. what would be lost their jobs, are the fighter pilots, who serve in the war against terrorism. Those missions can be done by using drones, what just fly to the target, and then drop their weapons.


The human's advantage in comparing with robots is that human would make surprising movements for those aircraft. And that's why human pilots still win the drones, and this is the thing, what keeps those pilots in the cockpits. When we are thinking that the use of missiles and drones is somehow cowardly action, we must say, that the leaders of the terrorist organizations and military forces would not be in any danger in those operations. If some Tornado or Sukhoi-pilot would drop the bombs from the high altitude like 10 000 meters, there would not have the single missile, what could harm that aircraft, if the opponent is some kind of Isis-terrorist.


The smart bombs, what have satellite guidance are extremely sharp, and in those operations, they could destroy targets very effectively.  The civilians are not suitable to comment those things, because that would be harmful to the reputation of military forces. If those pilots would be replaced with the artificial intelligence, there would not be heroes in another side, what is, of course, our side. But when we are going to speak about the fighters, we could act like some children at the sandbox, who are asking each other, whose car is the best?


In this case, when we are talking about multipurpose-fighter contracts, we can ask the question, what is the best, 4th,5th or 6th. generation fighter or multirole aircraft? And in this case, people have the right to talk, which one is the best, Super-Hornet, Gripen or SU-27? And if the writings have no influence or expertise, why those people would not have right to write about those things? Of course, somebody says, that I'm writing this for revenge because I didn't have promotion in the 100th. anniversary of the  Finnish defense forces, and that's why I' writing about this thing.  But people have right to their opinions.

Sources:

https://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/kotimaa/artikkeli/siviilin-ei-kannata-tehda-paatelmia-havittajakaupan-huutelijat-harmittavat-puolustusministeri-niinistoa/6936626#gs.wCcrRNM

Picture I

http://nationalinterest.org/files/styles/main_image_on_posts/public/main_images/testflyging_av_forste_norske_f-35_-_22492943335_14_0.jpg?itok=1NsSjsUW

About publishing texts

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/i-know-that-this-might-feel-like.html

https://sites.google.com/view/thereisnotextwithoutinfluence/etusivu

Kimmo Huosionmaa

I know that this might feel like highlighting myself. I sometimes write some texts and then I will publish them later. Because you, my dear readers don't pay anything about this, you are the user of the product, and that's why you have to stand this kind of things. Here comes again the instructions for writing, and one of the key elements is that the text should not always be so hardcore, that people should read every detail of some medical operation. And many times the details would hide the entirety of the thing. Here I must tell you how to get the person like me to some children's house, and it's very simple.


If you have bad behavior to steal diaries and sell them to your friends you will meet real multipersonality. This person is something little bit different, and the difference between normal people is that this person thinks that every thought, what this person thinks is something, what is wanted to share with other people. Why people keep diaries, what they cannot show to the public audience? This is the very good question, and when we are thinking about diaries, why we should hide our identity?


And does it feel cool to steal the diary, and then tell to other people, that "somewhere in the world is a person doesn't like your opinions". What this person thinks to be? What kind of opinions does this person have? When we are talking about the situation, that somebody wants to tell that some other person is stupid because he or she writes something to the Internet, I must ask: is this person who blames other so "cool", that other people must hail that leader of the gang all the time? If this person, who I write is so "cool" as this person thinks or claims, why doesn't to show that to other people. So where are that person's proofs, that his or her opinions are better than others?


When we are talking about synonyms, the military or police rank are not synonyms for high-level intelligence capacity, as somebody might know. Sometimes I have read that companies are kicked off the writers, because of their writings. But I must tell you, my dear friends, that in many cases the kicks were given anyway, does that person write something or not? And then we must say that "dare to publish" is the key element about publishing. If you hesitate to publish your opinion, I would suggest you the little trip to the local library, and ask about that material: is it so qualified or good that you would buy it?


And here I must write that in somebody's opinion those books were so good that they were printed on some paper and sold to the customers. At the last, I must tell you one thing about hiding and pay about the people, who would steal your diary. Those people would always ask more about that, and here I must say that why don't you publish your own thoughts? Why are they worse than those cheaters? Ice-hockey cards don't make their writing better or worse than anybody else, but if they would want to show their literacy skills, there should find some publicities behind them. If they are not found, we must ask, why they think that they are better than you or better than me? This is one way to think about publishing and writing.

https://sites.google.com/view/thereisnotextwithoutinfluence/etusivu

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/i-know-that-this-might-feel-like.html

There is no text, what have no influence, and imagination is the key to making interesting text

Kimmo Huosionmaa

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/there-is-no-text-what-have-no-influence_13.html

https://sites.google.com/view/thereisnotextwithoutinfluence/etusivu

Many people think that there are harmless texts in the world. Some of the most harmless texts are mentioned being science fiction stories. Those texts are mentioned to be coming straight from the writer's imagination. But the persons who tell that are always forgotten, that every single invention in the world is the reason for the imagination of the inventor. We don't want to believe any secret experiments or eugenics. But when we are thinking that somebody wants to make "super humans" might this person want to destroy weak genomes from the individuals. The most suitable way to make that is use radioactive radiation for that purpose.


High level of radiation can use as the scary element, what can keep people out of that area. But there is one possibility for keeping the radiation in high level. And that is cutting the individuals, who have weak genomes from the system. But this kind of things is so-called marginal Sci-Fi what means sometimes horror-style science fiction what means that monsters are creating human experiments. Same style texts are made by some notorious human behavior experiments. The source of those stories is the case, where psychologist named Watson taught the child, that teddy-bears are the frightened creature.


He used loud voice, when this psychologist shows a teddy bear to the child, what was called as "Albert", and that test was made in 1920, and some rumors are that this child was named "Josef", and he became infamous doctor Mengele, the "Angel of Death" of Auschwitz-Birkenau. This experiment was proved that people would make do anything by using this kind of methodology. This horrifying experiment made people think that behind some of the most notorious crimes is the person, who is the victim of that kind of experiments or unqualified medical personnel. The "Case Albert" was brought to my mind one very disturbing idea: what if somebody might make this test by claiming that fear was made by some jew, and could somebody make that kind of experiment to Adolph Hitler?


This could explain his fanatic hate against Jews. The experiments like "Case Albert" were justified in many societies, but it brought the mind of the people one question: what has been done in the institutes, what was in the middle of the forests. We must ask also what those medical experiments made with children who were not met their parents? The horror stories are sometimes written by keeping some areas clean by people, who would not want to see, what was happen in those areas.


One of the most attractive Sci-Fi-horror film what I have seen is "Capricorn one", where NASA hides secret, that it's flight to Mars is happening in the studio. Then the capsule destroyed during the landing, and those persons who were working as the "film stars" become the problem for the men, who are behind this thing. Then those persons made the decision, that those persons must die. And after that, they must hide the killers of the government. The story is actually the copy of the old theory, that NASA  made some moonwalks in a studio.


The original conspiracy theory about faked moon trips was the rumor that only one or two of those moon trips were made in the studio, and another of those capsules were Apollo 13, but there is no evidence of that. The Space suits are very useful in the deep space operations, and they could use in the kilometers deep.  In the claiming of "hoax moonwalk" the site where that operation happened was in the bottom of Ocean. The reason for those "studio flights" have been explained that NASA transferred money for "black budget aircraft projects".


But somebody claims that NASA would tell more lies about the technology, what has been used in their Moon projects. One claim was that in the chamber of rocket motors were installed the electric-dynamic motor, what was series of opposite rotating magnets. That system is actually known as "Die Glocke", or maybe there was electric arc equipment inside the burning chamber. The electric rocket motors like ion rockets would not need nuclear reactors for working. They can equip with generators, what is connected to the pumping system of the rocket, and they can give enough electricity that those rockets can fly in empty space by enormous speed if that would be compiled with the speed what normal rocket can take.


But, in fact, the most childish Sci-Fi writings and cartoons give the fascinating ideas of the things, what seems like real magic. When we are thinking about the situation, that space suit would be covered by magnets, what would accelerate ions over the space suits outer layer, would that allow to make real life "superman suit". But the problem of this is, of course, the electricity, what that acceleration system needs.


When we are thinking the conditions of outer space, the travel between the stars is possible to make by using space suits. In this case, the temperature inside the suit would decrease to the absolute zero point, and in this zero Kelvin degrees, all molecular movements are stopped. In that temperature, the organism would not get older, and if the waking up process is made that the person's body temperature would rise at the speed of degrees per day, and when temperature would rise high enough, would the automatized body functions return begin, by giving that person the electric shocks to heart.


When that "package" would travel to the targeted planet, would the transfer to the surface of planet happen by parachutes. And if there is suitable bacteria could those colonialists live like on the Earth. This is of course pure fiction, because if those bacteria of that planet might be different than our own, would they infect those travelers.  In the zero kelvin degrees would the systems of that miniature spacecraft be in the superconducting shape, and there would the batteries stay forever, because there is no resistance in the electric wires. And in the space is possible to pump electricity to the spacesuit by using high power radio-waves. There is some things what makes those things very attractive for Sci-Fi writers.


In some books the refugees from Earth would go to trajectory of Pluto, and then they would wait that the situation would become restless in that "freezer". And after they are forgotten those refugees would return to the Earth. This is one way to handle writing and books what would bring many good ideas to our mind. Remember that all great inventions are came from the inventors imagination. And the yesterdays Science Fiction is nowadays practical solution.

https://sites.google.com/view/thereisnotextwithoutinfluence/etusivu

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/there-is-no-text-what-have-no-influence_13.html