When the most advanced tool becomes the enemy of advance.

Why...

Above this text is the image that is not made by using AI. I took that image yesterday evening. That thing required a little bit of trouble and time. Walking into that point, taking my cell phone, and taking that picture took time. When I looked at that picture I realized why people use AI in many things. AI offers easy things to get the job done. That easy tool allows people to make thousands of lines of code in minutes. 

That is possible if the person uses some code libraries. And that makes a person effective. But that thing is not good for advancement and innovation. Also, that way of making programs is not good for data security. If some hackers get those code libraries that allow them to break the systems those codes are used. 

We know that thing. But we ever ask why person makes that thing? Why does that person use libraries and copy-paste? Why that person uses code, that somebody gave to the hard disk? The answer is this something forces a person to make things like that. The nice, well-done code in the hard disk makes work effective. And we can say that generative AI, large LLM, or whatever we call that thing is only to those libraries. 

We can be effective and always use that method to make things. That can make an impression. But then we can say that this method doesn't allow us to advance our programming skills. And that means the AI kills productivity and skills. But is the AI guilty? 

Do we bark the wrong tree? Should we prosecute the need to be effective for that thing? People use AI and code libraries because they have no time to learn things. People are so hurry, that they have no time to learn things. And if they make mistakes they are fired. That forces people to use AI. 

The biggest problem with algorithms is they use existing information. They don't call any telescopes or particle accelerators to create experiments that they can produce new things. They just seek existing information and reorder it. If we start to use AI more and more to become effective we are facing situations in which we don't get new innovations. 

New innovations are things that make the world more advanced. But when we make innovation. We process thought into the product. Without thought is not innovation. Because our mind is to bind to memories we are in trouble with new things.  That means we should create a mind that is not dependent on memories. But that thing is not very easy to make. Almost everything that we make is bound to memories. 

Algorithms do not create things. They just connect existent data into new entirety. And the question is this: do we let ourselves turn into the AI's? Mechanical minds can search existing information but cannot create anything new. 

If we don't let people innovate that means that we will not create new things. Innovations require time and space. And that thing is not a thing that fits into the idea of productivity and effectiveness. 

Algorithms are tools that make many things faster than humans. That is the reason why we use them. The question is always this: do we someday make algorithms that rule people? When we make things by using algorithms we can find an easy way to make things. Algorithms make our lives easier. They search for things from databases. Then, AI can make many things better than we can. We are afraid. That AI helps people to make things. 

Like fake doctoral theses. We are always afraid of that. People lose their creativity when they use AI. We ever ask why we leave our work to the AI. We see that things happen, never asking "why"? 

The problem with the algorithm is that AIs don't make anything new.  They just collect information from the networks. AIs build new entireties using information. That already exists. And that is the problem with AI. The problem is that the system requires effective working. During working days people don't cheer programmers and other people to make new decisions. The requirement for effectiveness is the thing that destroys creativity and advancement. 

People are afraid of remote working because it destroys innovation. But how many hours in week do we use for innovations? Do we really make innovations in our offices? Or do we just read newspapers and reports and make things that have been made 1000 times before? 

Many people think. That innovation is the case, where one person talks and the other listens. The problem with innovation and creativity is that people are afraid of failure. Failure is somehow a non-accepted thing, and that means we make many times things that we made many times before. 

Because. People are afraid of things like grammar mistakes they think that they must let the AI make their texts. Programmers are afraid of mistakes.  Fixing mistakes steals their and other worker's working time. That is the reason why the working environment forces people to use AI. And that is the best way to destroy productive thinking and innovation. 

The AI makes people look like effective. But that system uses only existing information. That is the limit of the AI. Even if we want to make images using AI, we must give orders to it. The AI is like the drawing program that follows orders that we give. That allows us to create new worlds. But that thing doesn't advance our painting skills. 

The memory makes humans effective. Imagination is the thing that connects memory bites together new way. That allows us to create new things. Memories and the connections with existing memories are the things that limit the imagination. The requirement for innovation is an idea, that doesn't come from emptiness. 

Memories are stored in our memory cells. When we use imagination we just reorder those things that we can call memory pixels into the new entirety. Those things are like puzzles that we can reorder. 

The big advance would be the mind. That is not connected with memory. The memory-independent mind is something that we cannot imagine. We use memories to create new entities. And it's hard to even imagine a tool that doesn't use memories. That thing is the tool that can make the next step for innovations and society. 

What is the purpose of life? Are we living in someone's mind?

   What is the purpose of life? Are we living in someone's mind?

That is the question of what philosophers thought 3000 years ago. Religions are trying to answer that question by simply saying "The purpose of life is serving god". And then someone says "why god create so violent creature that is so hard to control as we are"?. The simple question and simple answer turned into something that caused discussions at least 2,000 years ago, at the time when our religion was formed. 

The induction question for that thing can be interesting. That is "What is the purpose of the life of the god"? That question made pharaoh Akhnaten turn religion in Egypt into monotheistic where the god is astral and invisible but everywhere a long time before Christianity. The question that made Akhnaten turn Egyptian religion was the induction question for the question for the question "What is the Egyptian's purpose of life"? That was "serving the pharaoh". 

But what was the purpose of the life of Pharaoh? The reason why Akhnaten turned the Egyptian religion was purely political. The astral god was a tool that offered the Akhnaten the ability to avoid responsibility. The idea was that if the pharaoh made the right decisions the punishment would come after that man's death. And because the God whose name Akhnaten was "Aton" was not living in his palace nobody can ask anything straight from the god. But Akhnaten didn't ask the question "What is the purpose of life of "Aton"? 

Akhnaten with his wife. The image portrays something that theologists or researchers call the "Q-source". There was somebody or something. That gave an idea to Akhnaten to change the Egyptian religion. 

Are we living in someone's mind or brain?

Are we living in someone's mind? The idea that there is one mind in the universe was introduced by the Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger. So we might say that Schrödinger is the man behind the "intelligent universe theory". He connected religions to that model. There are many versions of that model, and in some versions the individual lives on Earth for collecting information. At the end of our physical journey, somebody reads memories that are stored in our brain. 

Then that information is sent somewhere. In that model, the data collected when a human walks on Earth is used to develop something. The fact is that the electric activity in the brain increases when a person is dying. And then the final pike in the electric curves in the brain happens just after death. 

Scrödinger introduced the model that the human mind is part of a larger entirety he tried to answer the question "What is the purpose of life"? Somebody says that "serving the god". But then we must ask another question: "How a single human can serve, or what human can offer to a creature that is so powerful that there are no limits for that creature"? 

In Scrödinger's model, the human is like a biological Von Neumann machine that developed with the most powerful and finest quantum neural computer called the brain. The Von Neumann machine is the machine that copies itself. The purpose of this biological creature would be to collect data, that will connect to the computer's memories and help to develop and adjust the models that the creator uses for some unknown purposes. This is Schrödinger's version of the purpose of life. 

Researchers can read the jellyfish's mind.

   

 Researchers can read the jellyfish's mind.

For making new. And more effective BCI chips (Brain-Computer Interfaces). Researchers should know precisely how the neurons are working. In the human brain is 200 billion neurons which is making observation of the actions of single neurons difficult. That's why the research must begin by using species whose neural systems are simpler than humans. And one of them is jellyfish. 

The deep knowledge of the actions of neurons helps to connect certain changes in EEG curves to certain actions in the body. The BCI can make the revolution in nanotechnology and robot control. But when we are thinking about the possibility to model the simple neural structures. Researchers can create new and more independent nanomachines. There are three types of BCI systems that are under development. 

1) The BCI (Brain-Computer Interface) is connected with human brains. And that thing is the thing that is used to control prosthetics. But the same systems can also control robots or give commands to computers. In some systems, the user of the BCI is moving the virtual character on the screen. 

The same system can use to move prostheses can use to move the virtual characters.  And then, the movements are transferred to a physical robot. The BMI (Brain-Machine Interface) is acting through the computers. And it can be the next-generation tool for robots which mission is to operate in extreme conditions. 

2) The microchips that are communicating with cloned neurons. In that case, the half-organic and half-silicon-based microchip can solve problems and control the things like nanomachines very independently. 

This kind of microchip is the neuron cell culture that is connected to the normal microchips. The use of living neurons makes it possible that the small-size system can be very independent. Because the living neurons are giving those systems very high power computing capacity. 

3) The microchips that are used to control animals. The CBI (Computer-Brain Interface) is the opposite acting system. To the BCI where brains are controlling computers.  The CBI system can use to control the behavior of the animals like birds, fishes, and bugs. 

The bugs can carry the sensors to the targets. The microchips are used to make biorobots. And if those microchips are connected to animals they are turned to intelligent. So what would you do with the wolf that has human intelligence? And the implanted microchips can make things like intelligent army ants real. That kind of thing is called ABW (Advanced Biological Weapons) 

But those systems can make things that are beyond the worst nightmares. The CBI or opposite acting BCI microchips can use to control things like ants. And if the microchip is installed on the army ant. That means those systems can use to make those ants act as the eliminators. They can slip into houses and then use to attack people or destroy things like gas masks. Those microchips can turn every bug in the world into a weapon. 

https://scitechdaily.com/caltech-researchers-read-a-jellyfishs-mind/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Army_ant

https://interestandinnovation.blogspot.com/

The writing about Monarch-program

Picture I

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/the-writing-about-monarch-program.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Franciscus the Assassin is the predicted name of the monk, who slipped in the Hassan Ibn-Al-Sabbah camp and murdered him. The question is that: how this monk could slip into the camp of the assassins? When we are looking that thing closer, we must think that this monk might be captured assassin, whose "Monarch" trigger would be removed by some therapy. If this trigger would be removed, the knights would have the ultimate assassin in their hands. In psychology, the "Monarch trigger" is the term, that means that the person has been taught to react in some action by committing suicide.  The mind control or trigger building is one kind of therapy, where can be used suggestion, hypnosis, and drugs. Those methods are strictly prohibited in psychotherapy, but some suicide cults have used them in their slaving process, what purpose is to make victims to give their all property to the leaders of the cult.


 This trigger was built in the minds of assassins because Hassan Ibn Al-Sabbah wanted that those persons could not uncover the location of his camp. In some rumors that monk was sent on that mission in one purpose. If the crusaders or some other knights would get those assassins in their hand, those organizations would have the ultimate weapon in their hands. The mission of that monk, who sent to the mission from Monte Cassino monastery was to find out, how the trigger would be built, and murder the leader of those assassins or "Hashish". This methodology about the trigger, what was built in the head of soldiers became in the mind at Second World War.


There to the mind of some SS-officials were built the trigger, what caused the suicide if their mission were to fail. At the end of the war the information, that Germany was surrender caused the effect, where some SS-officers committed the suicide. The program, where that training was given, was called MONARCH OMEGA. The project was led by Gestapo, and there was the "road" where the operator bypassed. And in the last stage, what was called the "omega" the person faced the trigger, what launched "self-destructive behavior", that meant that the person, who was targeted to "Monarch Omega" committed suicide.


The idea was, that operators were not able to tell their information to the enemy, and that's why they carried the cyanide capsule in their mouth. This kind of capsule was set inside those operators teeth, and they caused the death of Heinrich Himmler and Odilo Globocnic, the head of mass murders of the jews. Those persons wanted to be told about other war criminals, who worked in that humiliation and genocide project, called Operation Reinhard. The idea of Monarch was to create the person, who would have no moral or ethical problems to follow the orders, what the superiority officers give those persons.


And if those operators failed, they committed the suicide. This is the similar thing, what samurais made if their superiorities ordered. The idea was to make a human-shaped robot, who would always make only the things, what superiorities order. And when that warrior would not neede anymore, that person would die away. There have been rumors, that some intelligence or military organizations are continuing this operation with other names. And one of those operations might be MKULTRA. Also, the suicide terrorists are claimed to have similar training, as the time of crusaders in the 13th century. That would hide the identities of the leaders and recruiters of those organization and the locations of the training camps.

https://www.strangerdimensions.com/2013/04/24/monarch-programming-and-mind-control/

Picture I

https://assets.catawiki.nl/assets/2017/7/25/6/4/8/648620b3-7f30-4a80-bd06-3b4ed43e1c40.jpg

Thinking about imagination

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/thinking-about-imagination.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/thinking-about-imagination.html