Social isolation increases the risk of dementia.

The research of the Universities of Warwick,  Cambridge, and Fudan University shows that social isolation has a connection to later dementia. The increase in the risk of dementia is 26% says that research. But if thas also other effects on the human brain and wealth in both physical and mental areas. The question is the negative effect caused directly by social isolation?

Or are the things that are related to social isolation like the use of alcohol, drugs, sniffing glue, bad food like fat, low exercise, and other unhealthy things causing Altzheimer's? This thing causes juridical problems. Should people who caused Altzheimer's by isolating the person pay for the care of those people who got Altzheimer's because of social isolation?

This thing is logical. If the person just sits home alone that thing can cause things like drinking problems and unhealthy ways to eat. Those things cause problems with the brain. Things like alcohol, tobacco, bad nutrition, and a passive way of life like looking at the TV all the time without any physical exercise can increase Alzheimer's syndrome. The reason why exercise affects to advance of Altzheimer's is that if the metabolism of the person is slow the metabolism products are piling up in the body. The fat will get between synapsis. 

********************************************************************************

Social Isolation Increases Your Risk of Dementia by 26% and Shrinks Your Brain.

https://scitechdaily.com/social-isolation-increases-your-risk-of-dementia-by-26-and-shrinks-your-brain/

*********************************************************************************

And social isolation with food and other problems can cause caries bacteria can slip into the blood. If a person would not take care of the teeth. So Alzheimer's disease is not the result of one actor. Many actors can cause the plaque can start to grow in the nervous system. And that plaque is the thing that denies the communication between neurons when it will go between synapsis and denies the neurotransmitters travel across that hole between neurons. 

Also if the brains ever get stimulation from social relationships that thing harms communication. The ability to communicate depends on neural connections. And if the person has nobody to talk the neurons are emoving connections between brain areas that are controlling speech and certain memory blacks. That means a person forgets things like common places very fast. 

The reason for that is that the brain requires that neural connection to another purpose. That causes the effect that a person can know the place but when that person tries to say the name of the place there is no connection between the Wernicke area and those memory cells. 

So the person just cannot say the name of a certain place even if that person knows everything about that thing. Without that neural connection, the brain cannot create words even if the person otherwise knows the name of the thing. 

https://scitechdaily.com/social-isolation-increases-your-risk-of-dementia-by-26-and-shrinks-your-brain/

Image: https://scitechdaily.com/social-isolation-increases-your-risk-of-dementia-by-26-and-shrinks-your-brain/

The thoughts about the song "In the year 2525" part II (Microchip, what allows to click straight in the net)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are thinking about the song "The Year 2525", we can imagine that maybe tomorrow in our society might put GSM-data implants to a human head, and that kind of systems allows the people of tomorrow to click themselves inside the Internet, without using visible computers.  Those WLAN-microchips might have the decoder, what would change the data that form, that it can be used to control computers and in another way, the human brains would understand that data. In this case, the implanted microchips can allow us to use remote cameras or any database, where that person has access. This kind of equipment can allow making the "modern shaman", who can click the mind to the Internet, and it allows this person communicate with electronic devices by using EEG-transmission. Those micro chips could be the most dangerous invention in human history.


Implanted Microchips would allow following any thoughts and actions, what we do, and that would be the top invention of "Orwellian control society". This kind of systems is introduced in some SciFi-books, where the person is allowed to click inside Internet, without any visible computers. That could be possible by using implanted WLAN-microchips, what is set in the brains after the birth. Why is this technology so fascinating? It allows us to increase our body and mind to the machine, what would become our second body.  But we don't always realize the risks of that technology.


Memories what would transfer from robots would be our own, and if somebody would hack that system, would it cause the situation, where somebody can make murder and put that to some other person's fault. In this case, the criminal would simply collect the own EEG during the crime and transfer the brain waves to other person's brain core. Only thing, what that criminal must avoid, is to think his own name. And then this person can record the EEG, and transfer that to some other man or woman brain core.  That kind of systems is investigating in real life because the brain core controlled robots would be very useful in many missions.


Those robots would look like humans, and they would be controlled by thoughts, what means that the electric operands in the human brain would send by decoder thru the Internet. And the opposite way the robot would send the feedback from its cameras and other sensors straight to controller's brain core. The sense of touch would make by using piezoelectric crystals, what would send the sense to robots computer, and that robot would send that information to controller's brains. That kind of equipment allows controlling robots in very dangerous missions.

Below:

The link to that song

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yesyhQkYrQM

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-thoughts-about-song-in-year-2525.html

A relationship between social and printed media

Kimmo Huosionmaa


When we are talking about trusted media, we must say that of course printed newspapers are very high ranking and professional way to make media, but in some cases that thing have been caused even genocides. The problem is that some dictators are used printed newspaper against their political oppositions. In those cases, the "faked news" are caused the persecutions and violence against persons, who have talked against the dictators. This is one way to say, that many times dangerous is use trusted media for getting power in the state. I mean here, that also printed media can be used as developing the faked news and lies for people.


And this kind of misuse of media is always very dangerous because people are always trusted the media. But when we are thinking about social media, what is very unreliable, we must see one thing. When we are walking on the street, we don't have to look Facebook all the time. And we can remove that application from the telephones. That means we can just watch that thing couple of times per day. And the problem with social media is of course that if the people would use that thing, they might uncover very big secrets, or what do you think that somebody would publish the images from the house, where is guns on the wall. That kind of things is very bad for public safety.


But when we are thinking the role of social media, we must not stare that all the time, and when we are talking about the use of social media, those applications are meant to use together. So the all writings should be published in WordPress or Blogger, and then the links can be shared on Facebook etc. If we are thinking about working day and social media, we must say that the time for social media can leave outside the working day, if that feels disturbing. But the use of social media sometimes uncovers the little secrets, like that some worker, who is claimed to be an engineer has no training or education at all.


This might cause the little bit embarrassing situation if some team leader has been played an engineer, and then the dirty secret would be uncovered. In that case, somebody might want to ask, "why that person has not done anything".  And of course, if somebody writes bullshit or prosecutes somebody without evidence, can this person take to court. This is one very complicated question of social media. Superiority has right to deny the use of social media in working time, but if there find the things that are illegal, that would make possible to prosecute this person in the courtroom.


Nobody wants to be the asshole in the eyes of the family, and that would be a reason why some directors are wanted to deny the use of social media. But sometimes the reason for denying the social media is more complicated. There are cases that some other reasons were behind the blocking the social media, and one of them is, that worker keeps sick leave, but then there would be the picture, where this person sits on the terrace and drinks beer. That would be little embarrassing thing.

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/about-relationship-about-social-and.html