Can we trust AI?

    Can we trust AI? 

Artificial intelligence is a tool that doesn't create information from emptiness. That means the AI uses data and information that already exists. If something or somebody changes information from the data sources that the AI uses, the AI gives wrong answers. The AI can use old-fashioned information. In the same way, a human can take an old book of facts from the shelf. 

That is one thing that we must remember. The second thing is that most AI chatbots are owned by companies whose purpose is to bring profits for their owners. That causes a situation where some of the answers that the AI gives are customer-friendly. That means they are made to please customers, or people who pay for those chatbot services. 

However, one of the most important aspects of using AI is that it is actually utilized incorrectly. But the question is, why is it used? Because it makes work more effective. That means people who work with the AI assistants have no time to think and check the answers that the AI gives. The prime focus in AI use is that it makes people do more work. 

The modern business ecosystem has evolved over time, when all products were physical. That means the business ecosystem measures the effectiveness of the worker by simply calculating the number of work performances in a time unit. And that means the number of code lines that a programmer makes determines how effective that person is. And that means there is no time to analyze and think about the product that the AI makes. 

This is the problem with AI. It makes people more effective, and it should leave time to make analyses about the product. But the problem is that if the AI allows the person to work at double speed, that gives the company leaders the opportunity to fire half the workers. That decreases costs. 

When we talk about how AI makes things less effectively than a top-level programmer, we can find one very interesting question. If we analyze that argument closely, we face the claim that all programmers are top-level specialists. All programmers are top-level specialists. And another thing is that some workplaces are so hurried that they have no time to advise junior programmers. Sometimes old workers think that the young comrade is a competitor, and that makes the workplace atmosphere poisonous. 

The person might not dare to ask for advice from workmates. And that causes firing. The thing is that the AI is a tool that can help people. But we must remember that this tool allows us to analyze and think about new possibilities, only if we give it that chance. But we must have time and willingness to check the data that the AI gives. And if we see the AI only as a tool that allows us to cut the personnel costs, that is not the way to make our working life easier. 

If we just copy-paste texts that the AI makes. And don't even try to analyze that data, we don't increase trustworthiness in the company. That means we deliver the decisions to the AI. AI can also use old-fashioned datasets. Or it can use fake or falsified data. That means the AI makes mistakes in the same way as humans. It simply takes the wrong book from the shelf, and then that causes destruction or catastrophe. 

The AI is not immune to fake information. The problem with propaganda home pages is that their page rank are raised by drumming it with net queries. That makes those homepages easier to find. The problem with those pages is this: they use .com or some other neutral terminal identifiers. So, those homepages are not easy to connect to China or Russia. They are operated from servers that are in Western countries. The operators use a remote control to control those servers that operate in Western sockets. 

If the AI uses regular web browsing applications, that means it can select a propaganda page. The popular pages are always at the top of the page lists. And that thing means that the AI selects popular homepages. That decreases the AI's trustworthiness. The AI requires training. That training means that the users must set limits on what kind of sources those systems use. 

Is the universe made of information?

Is the universe made of information?

Information exists only if we detect it.  But maybe we should call for information. That involves deliberate information as data. Deliberate information exists only if we detect it. 

The fact is that this thing depends on the way we think about information. We can think that all physical things are information. Or we can think. That information is an abstraction that makes something visible. Things like quantum technology are opening the vision about information as separated from material or physical particles. 

The physical particle can carry information. And then we can face things like electromagnetism as the information carriers. The electromagnetic field can carry information, or, in wave-particle duality, the electromagnetic field can transform or condense into a particle. 

Or a particle can turn into the electromagnetic field. That happens in annihilation. Information is independent of direct observation. We know that there are things like eagles, even if we don't see one of them ourselves. Another person can tell us that thing. So, in that case, the medium actor lets us know that there is something called an eagle. And if that person is inaccurate enough, we can even believe that there are eagles on Earth. Eagle is bird and they live somewhere, even if we don't see them. 

The question is, will the universe be a form of information? There is a lot of information about the universe. The thing is that the universe is like Schrödinger's cat. It forms of information and it doesn't form of information. The thing is this. We must determine the information before we can answer that question. If we want that information to mean something, that means the universe is not formed of information. But if information doesn't need to mean anything, that means information forms the universe. 

But if the information must make sense, the universe involves only meaningless oscillations and waves. So when we talk about things like black holes, we talk about information. That vanishes. Or, we talk about information that slides through the event horizon. In that case, the information means the particles and quantum fields that slide into the black hole. That means a black hole collects information, but we cannot reach it through the event horizon. 

The information is substantial, or substance. That means the existence of information depends on the information itself. The material is not a substance because its existence depends on the universe and quantum fields. Without those things, Materia turns into wave movement. But information doesn't need even the universe to exist. If some civilization can exist after the ultimate end of the universe, that civilization has knowledge of the universe. They have information about their past. And they can talk about the universe even if they didn't see it themselves. 

They can make clones of animals that lived in the universe. But for that work, those creatures require physical things. So, information itself cannot make anything. It can interact with the physical universe through sockets. Those sockets can be the DNA molecules that contain information. Those sockets or tensors that connect information with the physical world can be the bits in the computer's mass memory. 

But a computer cannot turn that information into a physical form. Without robots. Robots are tensors that allow computers to turn abstraction into reality. Materia can be destroyed. But information lives forever. Theoretical information can be reorganized into a new form. 

There must be some information stored in the system that the system can sort data into a new form. In human brains, memory cells are like the net eye. They can sort information from those cells into a new form with a very high accuracy. The reason for that is that there are so many small information dots that the brain can put into a new order. And the number of those memory dots determines how accurate that image is. The information can make sense. But that information must not have a match in the real world. 

Or, we just don't find that sense from the captured information. Or maybe we should call that thing signals. But are signals physical things? Maybe, maybe not. That means we capture radio signals from space that involve information about reactions in distant worlds. 

Is some other, intelligent civilization behind some of those radio signals? 

The answer is this: researchers have not detected any confirmed messages from another civilization. 

Or a shorter version is: nobody knows. There might be many messages that mean deliberate information. But researchers and AI don't detect those messages from natural radio signals. That means the search continues. And we are alone until we get an answer. We get an answer only if there is a message that comes from a confirmed alien source. Until that silence continues and the answer remains open. 

That is the problem with things like language science and especially the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, SETI. That means we might have billions of alien messages. But we cannot detect the information that those signals involve. 

Because. We don't know anything about the information systems that they have. So we cannot separate those messages from the cosmic background. That is one version of the theories why we don't have alien contact. That model goes like this. They cannot detect our messages, as we cannot detect their messages. And maybe we should be glad about that possibility. 

We call virtual information imagination. That information can seem very reasonable, like a human who walks on air. We know that thing is impossible, but in the virtual world in our brains, those things might seem very reasonable. Or at least we see those things while we sleep. 

In the human body, neurons connect information with physical things. Neurons use information to control muscles and other things. The information that we get exists only if we detect it. If we don't detect that information, it doesn't exist to us. 

https://thatsthenatureoftime.blogspot.com/

Quantum entanglements and human consciousness.

Researchers noticed that human brains emit light. That very weak light that very sensitive sensors see is the thing that causes interesting ideas and thoughts. The fact is that we know that there is nothing meaningless in human brains. And that strange light must have some connection to brain activity. The question is can part of our thoughts be based on quantum entanglement between some electric or photonic field in human brains? 

The human brains have the capacity to feel magnetic fields because axons transport electric signals. The question is what parts in our brain make that entanglement? Do neurons trap ions like protons into the ion pumps and then make quantum entanglement with them? There is suspicion that the myelin cylinders are the key element in the brain's quantum entanglement. 

If that structure is the thing, that is behind the human brain's superiority it would be the ultimate boost for quantum computing. Researchers can copy that structure into the quantum processors. And make room-temperature quantum computers possible. 

The quantum entanglement can be made between axons or electric fields around axons. We know that human brains will not make anything that it doesn’t need. And the thing is that the very weak light in brains can have its purpose in the thinking process. There is also another interesting thing that researchers noticed. The human brain cells are growing in old age. The memory cells make new neurons all the time. The reason why our cognitive abilities decrease when we turn older is that our brains lose more neurons than they can replace. 

"Liu et al., Physical Review E, 2024

"A closer look at myelin cylinders and its location along the neuron’s axon." (Popular mechanics, Quantum Entanglement in Your Brain Is What Generates Consciousness, Radical Study Suggests)

The finding of the thing. That makes superposition in human brains. Can uncover and supercharge the quantum computer's advance. 

Or neurons start to remove connections faster than before. The destructive thing is that the number of axon connections will decrease so fast that brains cannot adapt to that situation. Our brains simply don't have time to transport memories to the next neuron generation. So do we use our brains less in middle age than in young ages? Do our brains cut so many useless axon connections that they cannot save memories? 

But the problem with alcoholism and some other brain damage caused is that those things destroy brain cells faster than the new brain cells can form. When the memory cell creates a new brain cell, that cell is meaningless without its memories. Brain damage sometimes means that the brain memory neurons have no time to send the memories to those cells. That makes them "empty". 

If those neurons exist they cannot perform the same duties as their precursors can. The cell loses its instructions on how it must make those things. Without those memory units, the neuron cannot do anything. The ability to create new neurons in the old ages makes it theoretically possible to input data, or “train” those new cells and then inject them into human brains. 

The big question is does AI make us less intelligent than our precursors were? The thing is that if a person uses lots of AI the person uses less brain capacity than a person who uses less AI if we think about the neurological aspect, if brains do not use some neural tracks that means that neurons remove those tracks. So if a person writes all texts and draws all things using the AI that can decrease the use of axons and that can decrease the IQ if that happens over a long period. When a person doesn’t use neural tracks that means brains will remove those tracks. 

When people use artificial intelligence for essays they must not think. They must not collect information and the main thing is that they must not process that data. The AI will give them a correct set. And that doesn't give them a chance to process and taste information. In the worst case, the student simply copy-paste the test task to AI. And that makes the essay for them. That doesn't require very much thinking. And in that version, the student cannot advance very much. 

So that means that it’s necessary that people use their brains for thinking. Without thinking, brains disconnect their connections. People say that we should read books and advance our way of thinking. But the problem is this: we have no time to read. 

https://www.euronews.com/next/2025/06/21/using-ai-bots-like-chatgptcould-be-causing-cognitive-decline-new-study-shows

https://www.laptopmag.com/ai/chatgpt-study-by-mit

https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a65368553/quantum-entanglement-in-brain-consciousness/

 https://www.sciencealert.com/your-brain-emits-a-secret-light-that-scientists-are-trying-to-read

B https://scitechdaily.com/brain-cells-keep-growing-even-in-old-age-study-finds/

The new open-source robot is a tool for everyone.

The open source opens a path to open applications. In open applications, the physical tool is the platform that can do “everything and more” as humans. The open application means that the robot itself is a platform that can be equipped with the tools and programs that determine its purpose and work. The man-shaped robot is the tool that can make “all things” that humans can do. The robot body can be remotely controlled, or an independently operating system. 

Macro learning where a robot learns through modules is the tool that makes the robot’s limited computer capacity more effective. The operator uses a system that records the things. That the robot must do in certain situations. When the robot makes something for the first time, the operator creates a macro. And then if there are similar situations the robot can launch the macro independently or ask the controller to make that thing. 

The idea is taken from the text editors and spreadsheets. There is a possibility to record some actions that are used commonly. The macro programming for robots follows the same principles. The thing that makes man-shaped robots very good tools is that they can act as builders, cab, and bus drivers, fighter pilots, firemen and make all dangerous missions. The same robot can change its role in less than a second. The things that separate fireman-robots from bus-driving robots and military operating robots are skills or datasets that the system can use. The operator must only change the dataset for the robot. 

And then that system finds a new role. The datasets or skills are collections of the macros. Those macros are activated when there is a thing that matches with descriptions. This means that when the fighter pilot robot operates things like alarm signals activate certain macros. The open source robots that act as cleaners are a good idea. But people don’t always remember that changing the program makes those robots the tools that can operate as commandos. 

When researchers create robots that they can teach, we sometimes forget one thing. That is, those robots can operate as networks. When somebody teaches or creates a macro for one robot, that robot can spread that macro over the entire network. And here is the problem with the “machine rebellion”. Machines will not rebel. This is the key element in robotics. 

But should we somehow transform that argument? We should say that machines will not rebel autonomously. So, we must not worry about the machine rebellion, but we must be worried about human-controlled machine rebellion. We can imagine a situation where somebody simply buys let’s say million housekeeping robots. Then that person will simply change those robot’s programs. And then that system is ready for combat. 

Robots can be dangerous to humans for two reasons: 

1) They are made to be dangerous. That means that things like combat and security robots can be dangerous. 

2) Robots can turn dangerous if there are some errors in programming. 

All errors that machines and especially computers make are made by programmers. The computer will not be automatically dangerous. Same way robots might not be dangerous if they operate as they should. The problem is that when robots are not programmed with certain accuracy, that makes them dangerous. In the cases where robots refuse to stop their actions, they might turn dangerous. 

There is a possibility that in the case of fire, the robot who works as a house guard denies the firemen's operation. The reason for that can be that these kinds of emergency situations are not determined in their program. So, when firemen come in, the robot can think that they are intruders. The other case can be that the law-enforcement robot has no descriptions of things like umbrellas. That robot can think that those things are weapons. 

In another scenario. Programmers forget to determine green T-shirts. or green balloons for the car’s autopilot programs. That thing can cause an error if the autopilot determines a green balloon as a green traffic light. And that causes a destructive situation. 

In some models, the other civilization can cause the end of some other civilization by accident. The system encoders simply forget to make the breaking protocol to the computer. And then that probe comes to the star system. The AI simply forgets to slow down and then the probe will impact the planet with a speed of about 20% of the speed of light. 

That causes the model that the most dangerous thing in the universe is the type of early Kardashev 2. Or late Kardashev class 1 civilization that sends first probes to another solar system. 

That civilization will not handle that technology yet. Without wormholes, it takes years or centuries to get information from that spacecraft. And if there are some errors in programming that spacecraft can impact the planet. The theoretical minimum weight of that probe is about 10000 tons and if it impacts the planet there is not much left. 

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/06/humanoid-bots-for-everyone-new-open-source-robot-unveiled-in-the-u-s-makes-advanced-robotics-affordable-for-total-beginners/

Artificial intelligence and spam filters make BCI more versatile.

The problem with the brain-computer interface, BCI is similar to speech command applications. But thoughts are not so easy to control as speech. There is a possibility that the person looks at the camera and uses gestures when the command starts. The gesture can be some cup that the user shows to the computer that the work starts. And the other gesture can be something like a spoon. That the computer knows the commands end. Those things can be finger marks and they could be determined before the speech command sessions. 

So the person shows the mark to the web camera and writes gesture 1 and then the system asks for gesture 2. The system must also recognize the voice of the speaker so that things that some other person says will not disturb the computer. The gesture allows a person to discuss and talk in the room. Voice recognition allows computers to filter non-necessary and useless things from the text that the computer gets. Then the grammar check program can change the text that the speech-to-text application makes into literal text. After that, the system dumps that text to the application and turns it into commands. 

The AI requires spam filters in the training period. The spam filter removes the white noise or so-called non-useful information. The spam filters can also adapt to the brain-computer interfaces, BCIs. Those AI-based systems can remove so-called white noise from neural tracks. And that makes it easier for the BCI to separate information that is purposely delivered to it from thoughts that are not meant for commands.

The person must not think anything else, than commands what that system should follow or complete. If a person thinks about something else, that can cause serious problems. The biggest problem with the BCI is the user. The AI can translate EEG curves into actions. But the problem is if a person starts suddenly thinking about something else. 

One thing that can make the BCI more effective is that a person must move things like fingers before giving orders to the system. But the problem is how to control thoughts at that point. But there is a possibility that very flat microchips will be put below the skull. And the antenna or contact point is on the skull where systems can download information and communicate with brains and computers. 

The system can also load those systems' batteries wirelessly. If those microchips can be installed under the skin on the skull, they are far easier to install than regular brain implants. The surgeon must just find the right places and then put those microchips under the skin. The bone mass will glue those microchips on the right points on the skull. BCI microchips can communicate with the internet through mobile telephones. Or they can use the computer’s bluetooth connections. 

But things like biological power sources like electricity-producing cells can also feed those systems' needs for electricity. The fact is that the biotechnology-like ability to create cloned neural tracks makes it possible to restore the ability to move to more people. And those cloned neural tracks can also make it possible for the microchip to communicate with living neurons through the skin. Those neurons that form artificial neural tracks could be connected to the microchip that is under the skin and then the sensor. That is in a hat or helmet communicates with that microchip. 

The next-generation BCI systems might not need surgery. The goal, or guiding light should be that the system uses sensors that are as easy to wear as hats. The problem is that those hats must position those sensors in the right positions. 

The fact is that the system called Magnetoencephalography, MEG can read data from the brain shell. The ability to connect interactive microchips to things like fingers should be easier than implanting them into brains. Those systems can open the neuro-implants and open neuroports to other systems more versatile than using traditional brain implants. 

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/06/ai-gone-rogue-openai-tech-secretly-used-to-bypass-spam-filters-and-saturate-the-internet-with-messages-on-80000-sites/

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/06/neuralink-could-shut-down-over-this-rival-company-implants-brain-chip-in-human-first-and-destroys-musks-lead/

Chaos is the thing that limits our range of view things.

The black hole's mathematical shape is a hyperbolic layer. 

Chaos or entropy is what limits our view. 

We cannot see the other side of the universe without very powerful telescopes. Because the entropy or whirls in space disturb information. Entropy or chaos makes it impossible to see things that happen in the future. The nature of time is simple.

Time travels in a certain way because the past is at a higher energy level than the future. There is the possibility that high-energy events like supernovas or kilonovas can push information back in time. Information cannot vanish but entropy disturbs it so much, that we cannot understand it.  

When information travels back in time the situation is similar to the case, when an ocean wave travels against the river. The counter waves or counter energy sorts or crypts information into the whirling form that is impossible to sort into an understandable form. 

In the same way, we can say that black holes encrypt information. Black holes themselves are things that make time travel backward inside them. But the hyperbolic structure of the black holes causes things that in the past the energy could also travel inside the black hole.

Black holes stretch information and information that travels through them is like strings. When other strings come against- or between those strings that causes whirling or entropy in the black hole. The reason for that is that superstrings are interacting with fields around them. They push energy to those fields and then those quantum fields rise against the strings. 

The black hole is like a cone that travels through time. The universe's expansion causes the situation that black hole has less material to eat. And that means it loses its mass all the time.

That whirl makes it impossible to detect details about information that traveled through the black holes. 

Light cone or time cone, 

The event horizon of the black hole is like a 4D cone. The black hole formed in the past. When a black hole travels in time it loses its mass. The universe's expansion causes that black hole gets always less material in it. And that means it always loses its mass. The 4D cone means that a black hole is like a cone in time. A black hole pulls information in it. Because its escaping velocity is higher than the speed of light that means time should travel backward inside it. But then we can ask: why we cannot see that information. Or why we cannot understand it? 

The black hole is an interesting thing. We can think of its physical form as a simple cone that travels in time. But maybe the internal geometry in the black hole is rather the time cone or hourglass. That means the black hole is the point that focuses information on one point. When those strings impact they form the chaotic form. 

Or we can think that information travels in a black hole in two directions. So, could the black hole be some kind of high energy- or ultra-high energy electric arc? Or can the impacting waves explain its entropy? 

The cone that travels in time is the thing that explains the chaos or entropy inside it. The black hole is like a funnel.  And if we pour water in that funnel that tells why entropy in a black hole encrypts information. The size of the black hole will always turn smaller. And it always pulls less information into it. That means there is space inside that structure. 

The space between those strings allows that little information can also travel against the main pull of the black hole. Same way if we put a funnel to the ground as the larger side to the floor and then pour water to the smaller side there is air that travels against the water. But the thing is that we cannot separate that airflow from the water. 

The entropy forms when information travels in two ways in the black hole. The black hole is like a time cone. Information travels both ways in that structure. 

https://www.quantamagazine.org/new-maps-of-the-bizarre-chaotic-space-time-inside-black-holes-20250224/

New physics claim that. There are three dimensions in time and one space dimension.

"The researchers hope that their findings will contribute to a better understanding of the phenomenon of spontaneous symmetry breaking associated with the mass of the Higgs particle and other particles in the Standard Model, particularly in the early universe." (ScitechDaily.com/A Revolutionary New Physics Hypothesis: Three Time Dimensions, One Space Dimension)

Theoretical physicists are always discussing one thing. Is time itself a dimension? In this theory, material hovers in a dimension called time. And gravitation is the thing that transmits information between time and material. So in this model, time is wave movement that takes energy from the superstrings that form material. If time is wave movement that takes part of energy with it. This explains aging. 

The new model is coming from the idea that there are four dimensions. In its original form, there were three dimensions in space and one in time. But then the model is replaced with a new model there is one dimension in space. And three in time. Those time dimensions are the past, this moment, and the future. 

This means the past remains. And the future remains from the point that it formed. 

In this model, time is connected with space, not material. And if time is connected with space that makes time travel possible. The idea is that there is only one spatial dimension in space, and three dimensions in time. That means the material is handled only by one dimension because we can interact only with a certain type of material. Or material that has a certain energy level can interact with us. 

And superluminal particles...

The superluminal (or faster-than-light) particles are like balls in a plastic bubble. The WARP field surrounds them. And they act like the ball that is in a plastic bubble. And that makes it possible. That they can travel faster than light travel around that WARP bubble. The WARP bubble itself involves an electromagnetic vacuum, where particles can travel faster than outside them.

So extremely high-energy particles are just hovering above that layer. Because they deliver energy so fast they form a WARP bubble around them. This is the reason why some particles can move faster than light. When a particle moves ahead the WARP bubble around it slows.

 In that WARP bubble, the particle moves ahead. And that means the particle in the WARP bubble acts like the ball in the plastic bubble. When the bubble moves ahead, The ball in that bubble moves to the back wall of the bubble. 

When the bubble decreases its speed, the ball in that bubble will continue its journey at the same speed as previously. So slowing the quantum bubble causes a situation the particle inside it will continue its journey in the same direction with the same speed as before the WARP bubble started to slow. 

https://scitechdaily.com/a-revolutionary-new-physics-hypothesis-three-time-dimensions-one-space-dimension/

https://shorttextsofoldscholars.blogspot.com/

Where do we need scholars?

Mysteries are fascinating things. And without mysteries are no scholars, and sometimes some people tell a joke that scholars are behind some mysteries because we want to keep our jobs.

Jokes are a good argument for crushing researchers. Press introduced  Charles Darwin as a monkey when he introduced the evolution theory. That thing was very nice because a couple of hundred years earlier that man would burn on the bonfire. 

The best receipt is that tell people that all mysteries are urban legends, and then after that, some jokes about the researcher's mental health make an impression. 

If we follow that track, we face the argument:  humans invented all things, that we can. And we don't need anything new. And everything that we can find is found. So that's why we don't need any new things. We can solve all things by taking assault rifles in our hands and that's it. If there is some Big Foot in the forest we can shoot it. And there is no BigFoot anymore. But does that remove the mystery? 

Maybe that thing is right. Or maybe, it's wrong. But when we are looking at a mystery, we must research one thing. We must find out what makes those things mysterious. 

If we read some books. That tells about mysteries. We must try, to find out why the writer selected just those certain cases for that book. What category did that writer use? And what is the writer's or document maker's attitude about those things that the person introduces to people? 

Does the writer or filmmaker leave space for the audience? That they can make their conclusions? And does the storyteller offer them a chance to discuss and talk about their opinions? Or is the story's purpose just to curve the opponent's opinion for some mold that the document maker wants them to get? 

When we think of the sad series of researchers that says "certainly that is impossible", we must realize one thing. When people make some conclusions, they must use information. That they have at that precise moment. 

The observation tools are advancing, and some things are changing. So we must avoid too strong opinions because if we take some attitude and defend it very strongly we are in a psychological trap. 

That trap is that someday we all face the situation that we are wrong. And at that moment, we must say that we are wrong. We know that we should know something. But even if something remains theory let's say about 100 years the new observation tool can prove that theory right or wrong. 

When somebody selects a certain path or road and publically tells that thing. There is somehow very difficult to select a new path. Because that requires that our person must confess being wrong. And that is very hard if a person is afraid to lose authority.

Sometimes people misunderstand the difference between leadership and scholarship. They think that scholarship and leadership are the same things.  Scholars observe some phenomenon or object and try to make a puzzle and find out what that thing makes and how the parts of the entirety interact. Leaders can use that information, or they can leave that information outside decision-making. That's their business. 

https://shorttextsofoldscholars.blogspot.com/

A man in the high castle (Happy new year.)

Mixed reality is an interesting- and sometimes horrifying way to create a mixture of virtual reality and reality. Above this text is a castle that is above clouds. Let's think that there lives a man. Who is commanding the country? That man ever comes through the cloud layer and everything that man knows about the nation's strength comes from henchmen, and reports that they write. 

The idea is that henchmen control the entire information. That comes into that cloud castle. That means they can introduce things like science fiction movies as reality. They can claim that the man in the high castle is commanding some imperial star cruisers from the Star Wars movies. 

The fact is that other people might think that this looks ridiculous. But the information that henchmen are giving to the man in the high castle. Turns into reality for the person who lives in that castle. 

For making mixed reality is no need for computers and virtual reality systems. The only needed thing is a media projector that introduces fiction as fact. Mixing virtual targets with real films are called special effects. And by using special effects is possible to create virtual objects like starships in some acted films. Or simply, mixing real news and fiction is possible to make things called mixed reality. 

If we want to make the mixed reality that somebody believes we must just put that person in an isolated place. Where we are bringing all information. And the person would not see things like movies, we could introduce fiction to those people as reality. 

This year has been extremely wonderful, except war in Ukraine. War is always a big tragedy. And the thing is that the other side, the president of Russia Vladimir Putin lives in the great Plato's cave. 

Some people believe that Putin lives in reality because that person speaks in the media. But the reality is delivering information is needed for command. But otherwise, the ability to receive information is necessary for making decisions. If we just yell at people and force them to say what we want, we can get information about what we want. 

But why would we do that thing? Why we just don't write a book or something that we can open the next day after the writing, and there reads everything that we want? 

In those texts that come straight from our imagination, we can command some intergalactic star fleets if we want. But is that the reality? Can we use that information in case that is just happening? And does it support something in the command chain? The command system requires real, and confirmed information for making effective decisions. 

If we are just sitting and looking at the camera, people get information that we share. But do we share information that has contact with reality? Or do we share information that exists in the virtual world? Our imagination is one version of the virtual world. And mixed reality means a system, where real-life components are connected with virtual characters. 

Those systems are interesting. But their effectiveness depends on the cases where somebody uses those systems. The mixed reality can be an effective tool in many missions, but it can also isolate people from reality. And in that case, we must ask what is reality.

https://fromplatoscavetoreality.blogspot.com/

So what is truth, and what is wrong about wormholes?

1) What is a wormhole?

In models, the wormhole is only a pair of superpositioned and entangled black holes. There is the possibility that the gravitational waves can start to travel between two black holes and surround them by forming an "8" shaped form. That form of the gravitational waves the shape of a lying twig is making it possible that black holes or gravitational waves at the point of the event horizons to start to oscillate.

So the wormholes are forming between superpositioned and entangled black holes. They are forming similar ways with all other superpositions. But the thing that forms the superposition between the black holes is gravitational radiation. 

The same laws that are ruling other quantum entanglements rule the wormholes. 

*The energy or information can travel only from the higher energy level to the lower energy level. 

*If both sides of the wormholes are at the same energy level that breaks the wormhole. 

*Wormhole can form only when two black holes are oscillating at the same frequency. And another black hole's energy level is lower than another one. 

2) Wormholes make the exchange of information between black holes possible. 

Wormhole or Einstein-Rosen bridge through the universe. And the wormhole is the channel that makes black holes exchange information. So researchers think that wormhole is a gravitational tornado that travels through the universe. That thing means that all coherent radiation channels can form the wormhole. But they cannot break the laws of physics. And that thing makes those weak wormholes useless in the long-distance change of information. 

That means they are not transporting cats or dogs through them. If the wormhole can make it possible to transport wave motion that doesn't mean that even hadrons can travel through that thing in one piece. And theoretical models are the beginning of real practical solutions. 

3) Forming of wormholes is connected with the speed of gravitational waves. 

So making stable wormholes between stars happens at the speed of light. If the spacecraft can reach the speed of light. In space, gravitational waves travel at the speed of light.  And only gravitational waves can form a so-called real wormhole. 

The reason why photonic tornados cannot make that thing is that they are leaking. The outcoming radiation breaks that thing. 

4) What happens inside a wormhole?

The wormhole is the tunnel through space and time. The core of that tunnel must be tight enough. The core of that channel must isolate the wormhole's internal space from the outer space. That denies the form of the crossing quantum fields. Crossing quantum fields are the thing that denies crossing the speed of light. 

If the core of the energy channel is tight enough. That makes a situation where the object rides with an energy wave. So in a wormhole, every particle and wave motion travels at the same speed. 

5) Can we sometimes travel to other stars by using a wormhole?

The question is: how big is the wormhole is. There is the possibility that wormholes are smaller than atoms. And that makes it impossible to use them in space travel. So we never can travel through that channel. 

But there is one thing that we must remember. Energy travels in a wormhole from the higher to the lower level. And if we want to benefit from wormholes in space travel we must travel to a lower-energy star than the sun. If we want to make the hypothetical journey to Alpha Centauri by using a wormhole, we must make one thing. 

We must travel first to Proxima Centauri. Theoretically, we could build a wormhole that transports information from the Sun to Proxima Centauri. The G2 spectral class star, Sun is a higher energy level than red dwarf Proxima Centauri. And then if we want to travel back we should make another wormhole near Alpha Centauri that is a higher energy level than the sun. And that makes information travel to the sun. 

6) There is a possibility that we can only transmit data through the wormhole. 

Transmitting data like photons or electromagnetic wave motion through the wormhole is easier than sending living organisms through that energy channel. There is a possibility that small wormholes are making long-distance quantum entanglement possible. 

Wormholes are a great opportunity. They can offer the possiblity to transfer black holes' energy to Earth. Or they can offer the possiblity to create safe-long distance communication. 

But can we someday travel through those wormholes? Nobody knows what happens in the future. Maybe, someday in the distant future, we can make those kinds of things. Before that, we must create theoretical models of how to create a wormhole. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/wormholes-quantum-computers/

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

Can information escape from a black hole?

The superstrings are extremely thin energy fields. They are pieces of quantum fields. And the wave-particle duality can turn those superstrings into particles. 

When a black hole stretches material it turns it into a superstring-looking form. But in that case. There forms an electromagnetic vacuum in the middle of that particle. 

When the pull of the black hole ends, that thing would remove the stretch of that material. That means the material can take back its regular form because both ends of that "spaghetti" pull them back together. 

Can information escape from a black hole?

It seems that this thing is possible. The information can escape from the black hole. There is a piece of evidence that one black hole spat out a star that turned into spaghetti and ate it three years ago. But how a material or information can escape from a black hole? 

The answer can be in the whirl that pulls information inside the black hole. When a star closes to the event horizon it turns into a spaghetti-looking formation. So the black hole stretches the star. And when the star's remnant falls to singularity, it follows the trajectory that looks like a whirl. 

After the information crosses the event horizon or the point where escaping velocity turns higher than the speed of light, falling material continues to travel by following the spiral track to the center of the black hole. There is the possibility that the spaghetti or stretched material would hover near the event horizon. In that case, the material is forming a string-looking formation. 

If there is a small gravitational vacuum or gravitational shadow above that string it may start to flow inside the black hole. In that case, the hovering string is the stable object. And if a black hole moves a small part of that string can go outside the main singularity. That forms the quantum protuberance that conducts energy out from the black hole. 

The black hole is like a yarn ball. Inside the event horizon gravitation, itself forms the string-looking formations. The massive gravitation pulls gravitation that is like radiation to string-looking structures. And sometimes one of those strings would go outside the event horizon. That forms gravitational flares that bring energy out from the black hole. 

In the most exciting models, the particle that orbits inside the event horizon could form quantum entanglement with another particle. That is deeper inside the black hole. The quantum entanglement is impossible to press to size. There is also no limit to quantum entanglement. 

So, when two particles are forming quantum entanglement through different layers inside black holes energy travels to the outer participant. Also, the energy channel between those particles acts like an antenna. If that energy channel forming by gravitational waves. 

Or gravitational radiation can push the other gravitational waves away. Gravitation acts like all other wave motions. And if the energy level of that kind of gravitational pillar is higher it repels other gravitational waves. If that gravitational or energy pillar forms from outside the event horizon, it conducts energy out from the black hole. 

That thing will extend the length of quantum entanglement. If that thing happens to a string-looking particle it can form an energy-low pressure above it. That thing can rise the particle through the black hole's event horizon. 

https://astronomy.com/magazine/greatest-mysteries/2019/07/19-can-light-escape-from-black-holes

https://www.livescience.com/black-hole-pukes-up-star-three-years-later

https://scitechdaily.com/most-extreme-wobbling-black-hole-ever-detected-exotic-phenomenon-predicted-by-einsteins-theory-of-gravity/

Single cells are more intelligent than researchers expected.

"To divide or not? Individual cells make their decisions much more autonomously than previously thought". (ScitechDaily.com/Single Cells Are More Intelligent Than Scientists Previously Thought)

DNA can be the ultimate medicine of the future. Theoretically, the researchers can create DNA bites that are ordering bacteria to leave the body. Or they can create the DNA bites that are ordering cancer cells to die. 

The idea that bases the new research that is telling that single cells are more intelligent than scientists previously thought. The research is published in ScitechDaily.com. There is a link to that article below this text. 

Bacteria have chemical brains in their DNA plasmids. The mission of those plasmids is to control the everyday actions of bacteria. But now researchers of the University of Zurich are seen that also other cells have an intelligent control system that is based on the DNA molecule or some yet unknown chemicals. 

The researchers say that the cells are making decisions by using both, outside and inside factors. And another thing is that cells are more intelligent so they can make more complicated decisions than scientists predicted. Those decisions are, of course, when cells need to divide. 

But there is the possibility that this ability to make choices by using internal factors explains why some medicals are not effective against cancer. Or how bacteria turn resistant to antibiotics. In that model, cells are learning to avoid some chemicals like antibiotics. 

So, we can make the hypothesis that bacteria and other cells are exchanging more complicated information than we even thought. In that hypothesis, the bacteria tell another individual what it just ate. And if the chemical signals of that bacteria are gone other bacteria know that some chemicals must not eat. 

The idea of learning cells is not new. We know that the immune defense is learning the dangerous antigens. The vaccines have based on the idea that the immune system learns to detect dangerous viruses. And then the immune system starts to attack viruses earlier than without a vaccine. 

But we know that bacteria and immune cells can exchange genetic material. Some bacteria or large immune cells have many nuclei. And those cells can transfer one of those nuclei to the other cells. When bacteria or other cells are changing genomes. They are discussing or changing information. The fact is that we don't know how complicated information those cells can exchange. 

Things like phobias are genetically heritable. We know that everybody is afraid of things like snakes and spiders. That thing is stored in the DNA of the people. But now we know that some other things are also written in that chemical memory. The information of learning cells helps researchers to find new ways to create new ways to give therapy for cancer or bacteria infections. 

And in the wildest dreams or imaginations in the future researchers just tell cells that they must stop dividing. Or they just tell harmful bacteria that they must leave patients alone. In that vision during the infection, the medical staff just creates the DNA bites that are ordering certain bacteria to leave the body. Or the DNA bites are just telling that cancer cells must die. But those things are part of the future. 

https://scitechdaily.com/single-cells-are-more-intelligent-than-scientists-previously-thought/

Image: https://scitechdaily.com/single-cells-are-more-intelligent-than-scientists-previously-thought/

How to control hovering C^60 balls?

 

Above this text, you can see a cloud. Cloud is the entirety of the water droplets. The rising air keeps those tiny droplets airborne simply by forming the lower pressure area above them. This thing makes water droplets hover. 

So if the speed of rising gas is high enough. Even large objects can rise over the ground. The combination of the high pressure below the object and low pressure above it pulls also dust and ash airborne. 

But there is also another way to make objects like fullerene balls hover. That thing is the energy stress that impacts those molecules. If the fullerene molecule turns hot enough that thermal radiation makes it hover. Image 2 is the fullerene where is trapped a water molecule inside it. 

The single water molecule has the quantum state that makes it polar. The polar molecules affect magnetic fields. So the heat can put fullerene molecule hover. 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Could the Roman dodecahedron be some kind of communication system or even a flying toy?

Roman dodecahedron (Wikipedia) 

The idea is that there is a ball of pure gold or some other rare metal inside the dodecahedron. Then the acoustic system sends the resonance signal to that ball. And then that ball sends the symmetrical pressure waves to the dodecahedron. 

The little  "horns" around that dodecahedron aim the soundwaves in all directions. That allows making the 3D structure that is created by using interconnected dodecahedrons. But if those pressure signals are powerful enough. They can rise dodecahedron even up from layer. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_dodecahedron

Image 2)  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_dodecahedron

**********************************************************************

Image 3)

The cold method could be more effective than the so-called hot method where fullerene will heat. In this method, the symmetrical pressure impulses will push the object upwards. 

Another way to put fullerene molecule fly is to aim the acoustic signal at that carbon molecule. Or rather the acoustic signal must make the water molecule in the carbon ball oscillate. That oscillation will transfer to the core of the fullerene. And then the pressure waves that are impacting the core of the fullerene and tunneling through it will push the fullerene up. Then the magnetic fields can use to aim that thing in the wanted direction. 

And then the magnetic field that affects the water molecule can make this small carbon ball fly in the wanted direction. Water molecules can use to control especially the hovering carbon balls. The thing is that the flying carbon balls that can fly in the wanted direction might have multirole missions in the next-generation nanotechnology. 

https://phys.org/news/2013-05-buckyball-inserting-molecule.html

Image 3) https://phys.org/news/2013-05-buckyball-inserting-molecule.html

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

There is no death in the quantum world.

There is a standard model of confirmed elementary particles above this text. There are two types of particle groups, fermions, and bosons. 

Fermions, like quarks, and electrons form material, like protons, and neutrons.   And bosons are force carriers. Every boson carries one of four fundamental forces. Or their counter force. 

W and Z bosons carry weak nuclear force for example. The thing that makes Higgs boson interesting is that it should be a force carrier. But there is no force that the Higgs boson carries. And that's why it's put under the highlight "Scalar bosons". So Higgs boson scales other forces... But that will be another story. 

Information never vanishes. This is the reason why quantum eraser is impossible. A Quantum eraser erases information, but that thing is impossible. The quantum cutter is the system that cuts information into pieces. But a quantum cutter or quantum clipper can just transform the information into smaller parts. The idea is simple we can take things like DVDs and cut them into small pieces. But if we have enough time and the right equipment we can restore those pieces to their original form. That means we cut information to pieces but we didn't destroy it.

Term death means that the thing turns meaningless to the quantum system. When we are thinking about information itself the death of the information means that information just vanishes. But the fact is that we cannot destroy information itself. When we are destroying things like DVDs there might be information that the DVD is destroyed. There is an empty place in the place, where that DVD was. The plastic bites tell that somebody destroyed the DVD. And maybe somebody asks the reason for that. 

**********************************************************************

Information about the cat remains forever.

Pauli exclusion principle says that there are no two identical fermions in the same quantum system. And because the universe is one large quantum system, there are no two identical fermions in the universe. 

So, the fermions that are forming that individual cats are different than other fermions. That means it is the theoretical possibility that researchers can track those particles and put the cat to its original form again. Because every fermion is different. That thing means that the cat could theoretically be put back to its original form. 

************************************************************************

If we are thinking about the universe where energy travels from one quantum system to another we must understand one thing. Every particle interacts with other particles and their environment. When a giant and a bright star explodes it leaves remnant after it. The interplanetary nebulas neutron stars and black holes are the things that are remembering us that there was once a star. Those remnants are the brightest things in the universe. 

So in the quantum world and the information, the cat cannot die. The cat is in superposition and it's the same time living and dead cannot die. The information about the cat stays forever. If something happens to a cat that means it's not in its normal place. Somebody asks, where is the cat? And that means cat still has some kind of effect on their environment. 

There is the possibility that the cat's body fell in the yard well, where the entire community takes their drinking water. Or maybe that cat ate some kind of poison, and if there is that kind of poison there is the possibility that other cats are also eating that poison. This thing is an example of how one cat can cause a very big effect. Even the cat itself is not in place or visible. 

Pauli exclusion principle guarantees that all fermions are different. In the quantum system is no two identical fermions. And because the universe is one big quantum system there are no two identical fermions in the entire universe. 

There is a theoretical possibility that researchers can find particles that formed the cat and return that cat to its original form. The information about that cat remains forever. Why I'm saying that? Well, there were atoms and elementary particles that formed our cat. Cat loaded energy to those particles when it lived. So the energy level of those particles is different than all other particles. 

https://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2022/08/19/there-is-no-death-in-the-quantum-world/

NASA's Artemis mission can increase synergy in robot-human cooperation by creating a database about robots and their interfaces.

'All robotic exploration is a human-robotic partnership. How do we amplify the science in this human-robotic partnership?' is the question about the human-robot interaction in space missions. Well, the fact is that the Artemis mission will bring NASA and its partners more data about robot-human cooperation. And the use of robots in scientific and other types of missions requires the ability to cooperate without borders. 

The synergy of robot-human cooperation in Artemis mission cumulates the ideas and applications that robots can use. Or where humans, robots, dogs, and some other animals like monkeys or dolphins are working as a team in the deep oceans and jungles far away from civilization. 

The more robots and their user interfaces are used, the more information they bring to the implementation of new ideas about robotics. In other words, when the amount of data accumulates. The research can create more, and more versatile applications by benefiting that growing amount of data. 

Robots are tools that can send to places where humans or any other living organism can never go. Moon is an excellent place to test systems for more complicated Mars and other missions. Also, the same robots that are developed to assist humans on the moon can use in many other types of rescue, surveillance, and military operations on Earth. 

The robots can patrol national parks even for months or years. And they can find out things that might risk human lives.  Maybe someday robots can uncover secrets like the Bigfoots only myths? Or are they something else like North American big-size monkeys? 

But when we are thinking about the explorations in the solar system robots could be excellent tools to research Venus and Mercury. Those planets are extremely hot. And they are also very interested in the extraordinary way. Venus can tell us why only Earth can host intelligent creatures. The planet Venus can also offer a place where the conditions are similar to what they were just before the first organisms, the ancestors of the first prokaryotes formed on Earth.

Those conditions can tell why the first RNA molecule formed on Earth and why that molecule started to create more and more advanced organisms that stores their genetic material in the form of DNA and forms organisms like birds and humans. The mystery is why this thing happened only on Earth. Robots can operate for months on that planet and collect samples. Those samples could rise to a high level in Venus' atmosphere and shoot to Earth by using a Pegasus-style rocket. 

But also Mercury offers an interesting place for research things like antimatter engines. The antimatter can form effectively from the beta radiation. That hits a thin gold layer. 

That gold layer changes the spin of those particles that are hitting that layer. That means they are turning to mirror particles. And then that antimatter will conduct to the reaction chamber where it annihilates with regular material. The surface of Mercury would be the perfect place for an antimatter factory. And that antimatter can use in satellites and probes that are operating in the entire solar system. 

https://www.space.com/nasa-astronaut-human-robot-synergy-artemis-moon-missions

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synergy

Image:) http://better-magazine.com/nasas-artemis-moon-mission-hits-important-milestone-with-successful-full-scale-booster-test/

The new experiments can prove a new theory. That information is the fifth state of matter.

Is information like the rubber band ring around the photon? In that model, the information is like a ring around a photon. That explains why a photon that has no mass can cheer energy. So the information would be like the ring around the photon. And that thing causes an idea that information itself has mass. So the shape of the information could be like a ring-shaped superstring. 

Could information be the fifth state of matter? The fact is that the information can have mass. And that thing makes it the state of the matter. So if that thing is real it would fundamental physics and everything that we know. And the question is what is information? We know that photons have no mass. Are connected with information. But when we are shooting photons at the object that increases the mass of that object. The massless particle cannot increase the mass of the matter. 

If information is the state of matter, we could someday create the information engine. The idea of the information engine is that it uses pure information or a hypothetical ring-shaped structure that surrounds photons for thrust. The thing is engine could win even a photonic rocket in speed if information can be separated from photons. And that thing requires that the ring exists and information is the state of matter. 

The idea is similar to hypothetical gamma-ray rockets that use gamma rays for thrust. The idea of the gamma-ray engine is that the gamma-ray that has an extremely short wavelength will be driven through the superpositioned and entangled particles. 

The system should work like the quantum-size waltzing machine that pushes that gamma-ray straight from. If that thing is possible the straight gamma-ray would impact through atoms. And because the diameter of that straight wave movement is so small that allows the straight wave movement can reach extremely high speed. And it could travel even faster than photons. 

We know that photons have different states of energy. But the problem is why that energy doesn't affect the mass of the photon? If we want to describe information as the fifth element we must describe its shape. The thing that can explain this thing is the idea that information is like the ring around a photon. 

That means the information is like some kind of rubber band ring around that photon. And that could explain why the photon doesn't have mass but can transport energy. 

Or the photon might hover inside the quantum field that pushes it above or away from other particles. There is the possibility that energy travels through that quantum field and forms the pushing effect on the other side from the energy stress. So energy travels across the quantum bubble of the photon. 

And then that energy wave creates impact waves that travel to another particle. That are pushing photons away from other objects. When the power of those impact waves increases they are transferring their energy to other particles. 

The thing that makes people think that some kind of ring around the photon is transmitting information is the photovoltaic phenomenon. If the particle has no mass it cannot push electrons away from their trajectory. So is information the quantum field or quantum ring around the photon? There is the possibility that information is a 2D structure that orbits the photon.

Sources: 

https://scitechdaily.com/an-experiment-that-could-confirm-the-fifth-state-of-matter-in-the-universe-and-change-physics-as-we-know-it/

Image 1) https://scitechdaily.com/an-experiment-that-could-confirm-the-fifth-state-of-matter-in-the-universe-and-change-physics-as-we-know-it/

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

Quantum teleportation and wave-particle duality are powerful tools in quantum computing.

"In the three layers of graphene depicted here, local twist angle can range from around 1.5 degrees (blue)—close to the "magic angle" for this device—to around 1.9 degrees (red). The arrow shows a twist angle vortex or Twiston. These areas of disorder help make the overall device more orderly. Credit: Simon Turkel"(Phys.org/In a sea of magic angles, 'Twistons' keep electrons flowing through three layers of graphene)

Electrons that are hovering above the graphene layer and the synthetic particles can make a new type of quantum teleportation possible. 

Magic angle "Twistons" are making electrons hover above three-layer graphene. If the electrons are on both sides of the graphene. That thing makes it possible to make superposition and quantum entanglement through the graphene layer. The information can send to those electrons by using electromagnetic radiation. 

And that thing can make it possible to make the new and powerful quantum computers. If there is a quantum field between those electrons. That makes it possible to transfer information between those electrons. 

If those electrons are superpositioned and entangled. Changes in the energy level cause changes in the rotation speed or spin of those electrons. And that makes them send the photon. That means the photons are making it possible to transfer information from the quantum system to the binary system. That happens by sending those photons to the photovoltaic cell. 

But when we are thinking possibility to make a new type of lightweight. And solid-state quantum computers silicone has been shown one of the most promising materials in that kind of thing. The superposition between the silicon atoms can also make through the graphene layer. So there are two silicone layers and graphene will be between them. 

There is possible to make two opposite rotating electromagnetic fields in the graphene layer. That thing makes it possible to make the wave-particle duality or synthetic sterile particles in the graphene. And those sterile particles are making flexible quantum computers possible. The problem with natural particles is that they must be clean. Before they are used as a qubit. If the quantum computer can use the sterile particles that make it faster and more flexible. 

When a qubit is traveling in the system it must be protected against outcoming influence. In some visions, long-distance quantum communication will happen by putting qubit travel between the waves of the wave movement. 

New findings in the matter-wave duality make it possible to create synthetic particles in the laboratory. Even if the system can create only photons. That thing makes it possible to turn wave movement to the sterile photons. 

But if things like sterile neutrino are possible to create in the laboratory. Those sterile particles make it possible to create long-distance quantum communication. In those systems, the sterile particle will shoot to the receiver by using the laser or some other coherent electromagnetic radiation. 

https://phys.org/news/2022-04-discovery-matter-wave-polaritons-photonic-quantum.html

https://phys.org/news/2022-04-sea-magic-angles-twistons-electrons.html

https://scitechdaily.com/breakthrough-in-electrically-tunable-graphene-devices-could-lead-to-the-development-of-beyond-5g-wireless-technology/

 https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

Does the information have mass?

   

Well known and unknown photon

Above this text, you can see the droplet that drops into the water. The water droplet spreads on the water surface until the underpressure channel that is formed over it pulls it back again. The droplet pushes the water that acts like a trampoline. 

And finally, you see that when the droplet is back in the air again it forms the underpressure channel under it. And that pulls the pike of water behind it. The thing that denies that the water droplet can be mixed with the water is surface tension. In the quantum world.  The quantum field is acting like surface tension in the molecular world. 

The reflection could be that the photon hits the quantum field. During that act, it releases its energy to the quantum field. That quantum field will start to oscillate and release its extra energy behind the photon. That wave movement causes the effect that is used in spectroscopy. The wavelength of that electromagnetic radiation is the same as the size of the quantum field that sends the radiation. 

So the photon is jumping out from the quantum field. But it releases part of its energy to that energy bubble that surrounds all atoms and subatomic particles in the universe.  

So there is the possibility that the photon is behaving like a water droplet. Photon has no mass, and the reason for that might be that photon cannot interact with the material itself. If the photon is an extremely low-mass particle. There is the possibility that a photon acts similar way to a water droplet. When it hits the quantum field. 

When a photon hits the quantum field of the atom it makes the pothole in that quantum field. Then that quantum field will push the photon back. When a photon travels in space there is also some kind of quantum vacuum behind it. When a photon jumps out from a quantum field the electromagnetic lower pressure or vacuum forms under it and pulls the quantum field behind it. 

When coherent light like a laser ray hits the target the photons are drumming at the same point. And sooner or later they start to tunnel between atoms. That means the photons transfer their energy to the atoms. 

And then that energy transfers to those atoms' quantum fields. And the material always delivers extra energy until it reaches energy stability. The energy stability means that the energy level in those quantum fields is at the same level as the energy level of the material. That causes the quantum fields are transmitting photons and wave movement. 

So, sooner or later that thing pushes those atoms away from each other. The other thing is that the wave movement tunnels itself between atoms. Then it starts to crease. That movement causes the quantum wave away from that superstring. That energy wave causes atoms are pushing each other away from the tunneling channel. 

The thing that makes photon very interesting is that it has wave- and particle forms. That gives a hint. Maybe the photon is like origami or rather creased than the ball. So if the photon is like the bite of the wave movement and it hits the quantum field where is a lower energy level than in photon. It can pull photons straight. If that straight photon impacts with a quantum field the impact area is so small that we cannot recognize it. 

The straight bite of wave movement can travel faster than a photon because the doppler effect is not so strong in that wave movement. But sooner or later the doppler effect will push that wave movement to a ball-shaped or creased snippet of wave movement that we call a photon. 

This thing makes one thing possible. That thing is that the mysterious graviton might be the straight photon. If that thing is possible it causes the thing that dark matter does not exist in the form that we thought. And at least the part of the dark or invisible material is in photons that we cannot observe. 

Diagram: The hypothetical form of the photon can be the right creased wave (1) that can turn straight (2). 

Information itself might not have mass. But the carrier of the information must have some kind of mass. So the photon is formed by the similar superstrings that are forming material. Like superstring theory claims. Also, the photon has mass. And if the photon has a mass that means that the dark matter might not exist in the form of material. 

There is the possibility. That superstrings or photons in some form might have the role of dark matter. And then another thing is that there is the possibility that the so-called "straight photon" is the thing that was called the hypothetical graviton. The graviton or hypothetical carrier-particle of gravitation might be hard to detect because it's the straight wave movement. Or its shape is different than regular particles. 

The small contact area explains why gravitation is so weak. The quantum underpressure area would be so small that they cannot form a visible effect. 

The thing is that information itself might not have mass. But the carrier of the information must have some kind of mass. Information cannot exist in the emptiness. But information can store in the wave movement. And when we are saying that information travels between superpositioned and entangled photons. 

We should say that information travels in the quantum field of superpositioned and entangled photons. So information that is stored in the wave movement will fall into (or on) that quantum field that acts like a quantum-size conveyor belt that transfers that snippets of wave movement ahead. 

The wave movement is like the string. And that string forms all material. So could the dark matter be some kind of string? If material is formed of superstrings those superstrings have mass. And that thing is making it possible that the wormhole can form when the energy level of that superstring is turning too high. 

When we are thinking that information can store in a wave movement we must remember wave-particle duality. That means the wave movement can take the form of a particle and the particle can turn into wave movement. When we are thinking that way we can have the possibility to create the "information rocket engine" that uses straight snippets of wave movement as the exhaust material. 

Could information be the next state of matter? 

There is a possibility that photons have mass because they are formed by wave movement. The photon is the only particle. That can change its form to particle and wave movement automatically. So because the photon has the form of wave movement and particle there is the possibility that the photon is rather like a creased snippet of wave movement than some kind of ball. 

Diagram two is the model of what the photon could look like. There is the possibility that if the photon is in the form of a creased bite of the wave it causes the effect that we know as light. But when the wave movement is in the straight form that thing might make the photon invisible. The reason for that is that. Straight wave movement doesn't cause so powerful interaction that we could see that. 

https://bigthink.com/hard-science/dark-matter-theory/

https://futurism.com/the-byte/scientist-dark-matter-information

https://www.sciencealert.com/physicist-claims-information-has-mass-and-might-be-considered-a-state-of-matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superstring_theory

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

The information could have a mass.

The information itself has a mass some scientists claim. And that thing causes an idea that maybe dark matter is some kind of empty bag or flat quantum field that travels in the universe. 

Researchers say that information has a mass. The thing that makes the mass of the information is the wave movement of the quantum fields. If we store information the things like electrons and protons. We must use wave movement for that thing.  The wave movement is affecting the mass of the particle. 

And the thing is that if we would aim the wave movement to the particle long time enough. That particle transforms into a black hole. This thing is an interesting thing to think about the form of material and its relationship to information. Some scientists claim that dark matter is information itself. And the idea of that is that dark matter is like some bag that travels through space. 

So is the dark matter like some kind of empty balloon? Which travels in space. The idea is that the darl matter is the remnant of some particle that turned into a 2D structure. 

The reason that dark matter doesn't interact with the material is that. It travels through the quantum fields of the material.  We can demonstrate this idea by comparing dark matter with an empty balloon. 

In this example, the material is like the mangle. The quantum fields of the material are rotating like the rolls of the mangle. And if we are putting the empty balloon to the mangle that doesn't cause resistance. 

https://futurism.com/the-byte/scientist-dark-matter-information

https://www.sciencealert.com/physicist-claims-information-has-mass-and-might-be-considered-a-state-of-matter

Image) "Artist impression. Of the observed out-of-equilibrium criticalities in graphene superlattices. The image illustrates the electron-hole creation process that occurs after electrons are accelerated to very high velocities. (Courtesy: Matteo Ceccanti and Simone Cassandra)" (Physicsworl/Schwinger effect seen in graphene)

The Schwinger effect can make long-term quantum entanglement possible. 

The Schwinger effect is the first time seen in graphene. And that thing can make the smaller and more effective quantum computers possible. One version of the system that increases the quantum system resistance is increasing the power of electricity which covers the outcoming effect under it. 

At this point, I must say that Swchwinger-effect is not the only way to create long-term quantum entanglement. In the Schwinger effect or Schwinger mechanism, electron-positron pairs form spontaneously in the extremely strong magnetic field. 

The idea of the Schwinger effect is that the material formed because of the effect of the strong electromagnetic field. That thing makes limits on the system. 

And if those positrons and electrons are in a strong electric field they or their quantum fields are rotating in opposite directions. That thing can cause the wave-particle duality. The Schwinger effect can use to create sterile particles that are useful to use in quantum computers. 

But the electron-positron pairs or positronium can use to create the long-term quantum entanglement. At first, the electrons that are trapped in graphene or Wigner crystals are affected by laser rays that should form the stable electron-positron pair. Then the data will transport to that particle pair by shooting it with photons. The energy of protons is traveling through the superpositioned electron-positron pair. 

https://futurism.com/the-byte/scientist-dark-matter-information

https://physicsworld.com/a/schwinger-effect-seen-in-graphene/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positronium

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwinger_effect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superlattice

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner_crystal

Image: https://physicsworld.com/a/schwinger-effect-seen-in-graphene/

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/