Writing about religion and opinions

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Sometimes we are facing the newspaper article, where is mentioned, that somebody is atheist. And this kind of news is probably meant for giving the people some kind of picture of that person's opinions. What does the opinion of religion and god influences of other work of that person, is the thing that I don't sometimes understand. When we are talking about religion, we are talking about the thing, when people believe, or they do not believe in something. Religion is a myth, what is visible in every city in the Western world, or in the countries, what has not the officially atheistic government, what would deny any religious signs. 

When we are thinking about the God, I'm sure that this creature would not live in my neighbor. And I ever met this thing, so I must say that if there is no proof the existence of the god, we must proudly say that we believe or we would not believe that thing. And believing in something, what can change many times during the day. We have all confessed our Christian religion in the church, but do we really believe in that thing? 

This is the thing, what everybody knows in the mind or heart, what term we would want to use about that thing, where we deeply handle things, what is important to us. When people are young, the things like religion are not very important for them, but at the end of the life, those things like the existence of the God would become more important. And at the final end at the time of death, the human want to believe that something is waiting for that person because that makes things easier to stand. 

But religion and atheism are good weapons in the attack against some other persons because there are no right opinions about those things. When that targeted person tries to defend self, would that cause only more critiques and even hate against that person, because there is no way to defend the right way. Every time when this person tries to say something, would that hurt somebody very deep opinion and feelings about religion. 

Or if the defense bases the religion is the real thing, that would be justified as a pseudoscience. But how this is possible, that our person never please other persons in the society. The answer is simpler as you might think, my dear readers, there are three groups of attackers. One is the team, what leads the attack, and other teams, what have the opinion that religion is true, and another has the opinion, that religion is false. 

This action would sometimes boost with programs, where some private detective claims, that somebody, who has the same background than this targeted person is some pedophile. That sounds good in the media. The harassment is also very often used the method in this kind of things, where somebody would be wanted to smoke out of the workplace. Personal opinions about religion are everybody's own business. That is the thing, what would not be seen in the normal life. 

How to comment another person's opinions?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The problems with giving comments for blogs is that we all have right for our opinions, and this makes giving opinions quite difficult. When we are giving comments for another person writings, we must say, that there is one thing, what we must avoid. That is saying that somebody has the worse opinion than somebody else has. And even if somebody writes something stupid, would that happen because the writer has different opinions than some readers. We all have a different kind of interests every person in the world are not interested in Henry Kissinger, and what kind of actor this person was in the foreign policy of the USA.


But same way everybody is not interested in ice-hockey. And when we are thinking about opinions, we must ask one very important question: do you have right to share your opinions with other persons, who surround you, and be sure that nobody laughs at you? When we are thinking about some gangs, we must see that they are like military organizations. Then somebody says something, what is against the opinion of the gang leader, would that cause the thing, that this person, who said something, that doesn't please the leader of the gang, would not travel to next ice-hockey world championships with that person.


This is everything in the membership of some gangs. There is the absolute strict dress code, what means that those persons must also be fans of some particular ice-hockey teams, and if those persons would not have some particular opinions about those teams, would that cause kicks off the gang. This is problematic for giving comments for something, where would we not handle ice-hockey.  When some person writes about asteroids and another civilization, there are no absolute right answers for those things like wormholes and alien civilizations. Science or art is not an ice-hockey game, where the better team makes more goals than another. This makes comments for some blogs quite difficult.


There would be not straight and scientifically proven absolute truth about those things, and if you want to argue with some philosopher, would that man or woman turn the expected distance of alien civilization enough big, that the radio signals would not be in that distance before this philosopher would die. And this means that nobody can hurt dead philosopher.  This means that this man would not care anything if this person would be rest in the grave. People would not get anger anything, what they hear or see.


And this is the reason why around some military leaders were playing music because those military leaders like Albrecht Von Wallenstein surrounded themselves with musicians, because of this makes sure that any bad world in the conquerer city would not get in the ear of Wallenstein, what could cause that half of city could be executed. And the purpose of that music was to make that general unable to hear anything that was meant for that general.


Nobody wants to hear bad feedback about their writings. That means that if somebody gives bad feedback, would that person go to the first time want to close the blog because the feedback was not, what writer wants that be. We all want to get good feedback, but at the same time, we must know, that somebody might not want to see our writings in the same way, as the writer sees it. And that would cause conflicts between those persons. Maybe somebody would have the right opinion, but there are always people, who believe that they are better than another. And that might cause conflicts between those actors.


The biggest threat to dictators are people, who have the ability to think by using own brains. They can always ask real questions about the leadership. And one of the best is, that "why dictators must always rule rest of their life" second one would be that "who says that this particular leader is better than others. It would be nice to hear that thing from some dictator. That person might think that is "cool" to control everything in their political system, but as we might think, there would be very difficult to explain the dictatorial way to use police and army in those countries. And would it be nice to send political enemies to the concentration camps? Does it feel nice? And those things are very complicated for answering.But why that man believe, that he is an only good change to his nation? This is the questions, what would be nice to ask some hardcore dictators in the world, who rule their countries by iron touch.                     
https://marxjatalous.blogspot.fi/