The use of mobile telephones as the spying tool

Picture I

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Use of the mobile telephones in multiple new purposes have made this thing also very effective spying tool. The mobile telephones 3D-scanning programs use the sonar system of the mobile telephone to create the 3D-models of the targeted piece. But do you know, that the similar systems can modify the mobile telephone very effectively the remote microphone and eavesdrop device, that can break privacy in any house, there is found the window? And behind that window, persons are talking about private talkings.


If some person would speak something, what is private, that kind of remote microphones and spying tools can record those talking, and the target would not notice anything. The resonance of the class can be meter also by using sonar or radar, and that resonance can change as the voice signal by using similar technology as the laser microphones use. Those mobile telephones can fly to the roof, near to the targeted window by using drones, and they can observe everything, what happens in the targeted room. If those systems are covered with new STEALTH-layers, what makes them merge in the background, like chameleons those systems would be invisible. And the active STEALTH uses the small cameras to make pictures from opposite side of the device, what makes them act like chameleons. Those drones can also equip with automatic rifles or submachine guns, and they can use to eliminate any target in the world.


And if the resolution capacity of SONAR is high enough, that system can break any privacy in the world. And the mobile telephones can be used as the eavesdropping device simply by leaving the Whatsapp or some other social media solution on and leaving the telephone in the room, and the voice inside that room would be analyzed by using computer programs. Those programs can separate speech from the back noise very effectively, and that's why even the weakest sounds can transform to normal recording.


This thing can allow that any person can record the voices behind the glass and modern mobile telephones also make photographing in the streets very unseen. That is the reason, why even the highly secret government facilities are not marked themselves by using the "photographing prohibited signs". That kind of signs are actually like red roosters for some photographers, and that's the reason why that sign is not found anywhere except near some military bases. It's impossible to control the photographing in ordinary streets. And for the better information security, those signs are not placed in the streets.

Picture I

https://o.aolcdn.com/images/dims?quality=100&image_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fo.aolcdn.com%2Fhss%2Fstorage%2Fmidas%2Ffe046bab7fb8f9af08ce716ad0b03dda%2F202523229%2Fmicrosoft-mobilefusion.jpg&client=cbc79c14efcebee57402&signature=86ad9c6e0ba7e562d807a0f0a0abf52c72656677

Beware this while using some voice command program

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/beware-this-while-using-some-voice.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

How easy is to use voice commands in the mobile telephone. It's like in some "Star Trek" movie. If somebody wants to make very big and easy security leak to the smartphone, would that person need only some subliminal voice generator, and if the targeted person uses the system, what records the commands, what is given by using voice, would the mobile telephone become the very big security problem. Then somebody wants to teach some own commands to the mobile telephone, must this person need only some voice, like 80's techno-hit.


And then that person need only get the targeted mobile telephone in the hands in a couple of minutes. After this, that person might tech some tricks like publishing websites or using GPS to that telephone, and then that hacker must only wait for the right place and then put the music on. After that, the mobile device would automatically make records or publish websites without that the owner would even notice that. And of course, if those commands can be taught by using remote control, would that cause the situation, that the GPS system can be activated in some particular area.


After that this mobile telephone would be very easy to track. In the remote teaching, the hacker would need only two mobile telephones, what are connected to the same account. By using another telephone, the hacker would teach voice commands to another telephone, and in this case, the hacker would activate some chat-program like What's App, and then just record every world, what is told near the telephone. Even if those records are not very clear, the voice could analyze by using computer software, that uncovers every world, that is talked near the device.


This is one threat for the people, who uses mobile telephones. And somebody can teach those commands to the telephone in the house party, where the targeted person might pump full of some drugs like Sodium Pentothal, and after that, this person would tell any password, what the people want to know. The same chemical is also used in lethal injections. But that chemical is also capacity to operate as the "truth serum", and sometimes SOCOM uses it for terrorist interrogation and that might be very effective in this role.

https://www.facebook.com/IWCsync/posts/10156613717489406


http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/beware-this-while-using-some-voice.html

The story of the "bad eye"

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-story-of-bad-eye.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

In this text, I would handle telepathy by the visual angle that this ability would be natural or it can make possible by using technical solutions like superconductors and computer technology, what could decode thought that they are possible to transfer as the text to the computer screen. So I would also bring here the technical methodology for that fascinating thing. Of course, by using superconducting antennas and computers could somebody capture the thoughts of the human, by observing the electric field of the human nervous system, they can bring close enough by using drones and sending that data to supercomputers and decoders thru the Internet.


The same technology would be used in the robots, what are controlled by EEG. The mind-reading systems are actually only more sensitive than the systems, what are used to control those robots. This kind of technology is tested under the control of Psi-Tech Corporation, what is also Pentagon's subcontractor. Telepathy could be an awesome thing for the military- and civil intelligence services. But in the wrong hands, this technology would cause horrifying things, and give those persons ability to break other people privacy. And also that corporation is also interested in the ability to read the body language of the people. There is the strange gypsy tale, about persons who have "bad eye". The story tells that "bad eye" is the third eye in the center of the forehead of some people. There are many explanations for the story about this very strange thing.


Some psychologists believe that those persons have the skill to read the target persons body language, and also make observations about the voice level and sound of the speech of the targeted person. And maybe some person have so perfect ear for music, that this person can notice the changes in sound levels of other person speaks. Also when somebody introduces the new way to make things, we should ask that person, what is the reason for that new way. Sometimes the reforms in the system are limited one thing, and that is the "clear and visible rank to the persons who are in this system".


In that case, I would ask that reformer, what could be this person's own role in the system? Sometimes the reason for reforms would be very selfish, and when we are thinking about the situation, that the ruler of the nation would make his position heritable, we must think that how that order was put in that persons mind? Was it that inheritable monarchy the ruler can do everything that the ruler wants without consequences.  And of course, this way to rule the nations would look very good, because the majesty doesn't need to please anybody, but there is another side in this way to rule. The problem is that the children of this monarch are very exposed to compliments, and that would make them naive because they don't believe that somebody can treat them.


But when we are going back to term "bad eye", we can give another very natural explanation. In this model "bad eye" means only the ability to read the royal codes. And if there is the certain man, who would bring execution orders, would that able to predict that somebody has told something bad to the king, and then this person could flee from the court. Maybe the behavior of the persons of the court has changed, and that helps to predict that the patience of majesty is ended. But then we must think some very complicated and supernatural things, that this writing would not become too ordinary. Sometimes I have thought that some persons are very sensitive to magnetic fields.


And in this case I must ask a question, is it possible that some people can also use that magnetic sense for reading thoughts of another person. In this case, the ability to sense electric fields of another person's nervous system doesn't mean that everything that is conducted to that ability would be true. The ability to read thoughts doesn't mean that this person could take another person to control. If taking another person to control would be possible, would that mean that this would be possible only between two living organisms? The telepathy doesn't mean that this person could move stones or another dead artifact by using the mind. Telepathy could be possible if the human could sense the electric field, what surrounds every human. But there would not real evidence that is possible.


But of course military intelligence has been tested telepathy, and in the tests that were made by DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) were given negative answers to that question. Somebody claims that if some persons would have the ability to read thoughts, they might realize the thing, why military intelligence was tested them. And in that case, those persons could hide their ability to read another person mind. This part of the text bases that there are animals existed what can sense the electric fields of their quarries. And maybe some humans can have that ability, or somebody claims that in the birth every person in human race would have the ability to read thoughts.


But then other senses would cover that ability, and the ability to feel magnetic fields turns recessive sensor, what can, of course, turn back to dominating ability, if some person would stay years in some jungle alone. And that thing has been given ideas to some movies. The most remarkable movie about this case has been the movie, where the main character could read other personal thoughts by shaking their hands. In this case, the reason for that ability might be more simple than you ever thought. When somebody shakes another person's hand, would that person feel, what kind of hand the opponent has? And if that person claims to work in some heavy work, but the hand of that person is soft, would that tell about lies. But sometimes I would think, that does somebody actually have the ability to read thoughts without auxiliary equipment? If that could be possible, that person could be richest in the world.

Sources:

http://www.psitech.net/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroreception

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10210685

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-story-of-bad-eye.html

Problems with face recognition programs and Facebook

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/problems-with-face-recognition-programs.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa


Privacy is the very complicated thing, and some people don't want that their pictures would deliver to the Internet. Other people claim that the things like image recognition would make users juridical position better.  Now there is the new problem with people, who want to hide their identity in social media. That is the image recognition mode in Facebook, and that would cause very embarrassing situations in social media because that technology denies using other person pictures in that solution. Another thing that is very exciting is that face recognition software can be used in special locking systems in the highly secured computer world.


That kind of systems can allow locking important files in the computer, and they can be used by WEB-camera, what would work in laptop and mobile telephone. The new kind of computer protection allows to open the computer, but the files that are confidential turns to the "stealth-mode", what means that if the superiority, who has no access to all data uses computers with the henchman's password can he use that computer, but the superiority doesn't see the highly secure files, what is not meant to that boss. But when we are going back to the problems with face recognition there is one very big problem with the law. If somebody takes the picture in courtroom or military area, would that person allowed to mark other persons, and then compile their faces with other social media accounts, and that would allow uncovering the real identities of the policemen, who are working under faked identity.


There is one big problem: what if somebody uses this system as a "stealth mode", what means that the user of mobile telephone doesn't even know that the face recognition programs are installed in the mobile telephone by remote control. This means that some third party can remotely identify any person, who stands ahead of the infected mobile telephone. And the camera can be used by remote controlled. The image recognition is maybe illegal, but what the law enforcement can do with that? If somebody would take Facebook to the court, they might say, that also use other person's identity for harmful purposes is also illegal.


The juridical point of the image recognition is that everybody has right to send any data about him or her self what the person wants. Also, the defenders would take the point, that everybody has right to know, that the pictures if this person is not manipulated and their faces would not stamp to porn pictures. But this might cause the situation, that some criminals misuse that service. And if the court would not clearly say that face recognition hurts somebody persons legal right to privacy, will the Facebook continue the use of that system. Terrorists and drug smugglers are not persons, who're privacy would stop the use image recognition on the Internet.

lifestyle/digi/artikkeli/ethan-hyvaksynyt-naita-asetuksia-facebook-puskee-nyt-eurooppalaisille-kiisteltya-kasvojentunnistusta-pahimmillaan-laitonta/6878032#gs.fmCl0rM

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/problems-with-face-recognition-programs.html