AI’s advancement turns slower.

    AI’s advancement turns slower.

Growing accuracy requires more complicated code. That causes a situation where AI’s advancement slows. When developers created some pseudo-AI tool in a couple of hours in the 1980s, those programs required about 10-50 lines of code. Those programs asked “what's your name?” and then they output the name that the user gave. Then they might ask, “Is the sun shining”? And then the user could answer “yes” or “no”. Then the program replied with something that gave good things in the user’s mind. Today, AI algorithms require billions of code lines. And that causes a situation where the advancement slows. 

So, when accuracy grows in program advancement slows. 

AI’s advancement turns slower. When its accuracy grows. And that means the AI follows the line of the limits in mathematics. Term limits mean the equation that’s the curve approaches zero endlessly. But that curve never reaches zero. If we translate this mathematical equation into an AI model, we can say that when AI approaches human level, the advancement slows down. Maybe. The AI will never reach a complete human level for programmers, but it will reach a level that is almost human-level intelligence. So the base elements in the AI are easy to make.

Then, researchers should find something more accurate. At the same time, they must find new, complicated ways to train their AI. And that means there is a need for more complicated algorithms. Those algorithms require more power, more time, and more accuracy. This means that the programmers use more and more time. That developers can  create more complicated code for algorithms. And how they should react. When accuracy grows. The sector of their algorithm can work turn smaller in the same time. When the need for accuracy grows, the speed of programming slows. 

And the next thing is that the error detection must be at a level where the system can be trusted. Another thing. What slows AI’s advancement is the calculation power. The system needs the entire data center for every query. That means the system needs so much calculation power that developers have no money to buy the systems that they need. Complicated code requires high-power, very high-accuracy systems. And when the system requires lots of capacity for the smallest duties. 

That causes a situation where the developers don’t have time to use AI as they need. When some details keep the system busy, it has no time to drive new code. Complicated code requires a complicated- and long-term error-detection process. The human coder cannot check even billions of lines of computer code. The entire human lifetime is not enough for that process if the human coder wants to make that thing without automated tools. 

Can the universe itself be pixelated?

Image: (ScitchDaily.com/The search for signatures of quantum gravity forges ahead.)

"German physicist Werner Heisenberg deduced that space and time are pixelated into indivisible three-dimensional Planck Length, are we living in a pixelated universe? If we are, then what type of geometric code would describe a pixelated reality?" (https://awakeandaware.ca/pixelated-universe-and-quantum-theory/)

If we are thinking of the pixelated universe theory we can think that the entirety acts like the pixel camera image. We see the entirety, made by multiple pixels. Every single pixel is independent. But it's the part of the entirety called the universe. 

The thing is that we can look at things like quarks as independent things. But we can also see them as the part of the entirety called atoms or universe. And the thing that determines the entirety of what we see is the accuracy of what we are using. 

We can observe things like quarks and maybe someday we will know everything about those things. But the quarks are not themselves telling us anything about things like planets. The planets are forming of atoms that are forming of quarks. But getting information about the environment of the planets requires that we observe the entirety called the planet. The planet might give us a piece of very much information about itself. But can we scale that information for all other planets? 

The fact is that we can say that quarks are forming planets. and that thing can scale to the entire universe. 

The entire material formed of quarks.  Except for black holes. Or are we sure about that thing? About 85% of the material in the universe is invisible so the only reaction between dark and visible material is gravitation. And if we think that way we cannot be sure about the thing that forms the dark matter. When we increase accuracy we see details. If we decrease the accuracy we see entireties. But if we use too high accuracy. We would lose the entirety. 

That thing is seen in the graphical software. When we are increasing the accuracy too high that will pixelate the image. We see only pixels. But we cannot see the image. For making the image visible. We must decrease accuracy that we can see the entirety. 

And that is one of the most interesting things in cosmology. The quarks can observe as independent things. But the quarks can also observe as part of the entireties. 

The thing in pixelated universe theory is that. Every single particle is surrounded by its quantum field. This thing might seem very easy to understand but then we might remember the exclusion principle that there are not two similar fermions in the same quantum system. So that thing means that the superposition between two natural fermions in the same quantum system is not possible. 

The thing is what the pixelated universe theory means.  That is when we are increasing the accuracy in the system. We might get more and more fractals quantum pixels that are repeating themselves. So is the universe one great quantum system with multiple sub-quantum systems? 

The fact is that if we would travel far enough from the most out layer of the universe we might see the universe as one quantum entirety. So the quantum entirety will expand from the tiniest particles in the universe to the entirety called the universe. The thing is that there is the possibility that the universe is part of the larger quantum entirety where are other universes. 

https://futurism.com/universe-pixelated

https://scitechdaily.com/is-space-pixelated-the-quest-for-quantum-gravity/

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

The new North Korean train-mounted missile system contains ballistic missiles wich range is about 800 kilometers. This is the thing that is told about those missiles. And there is a couple of things that we should know about those probably nuclear-capable systems. 

If we are thinking that those missiles cannot be sharp we are wrong. Even the primitive weapon systems can be accurate. During WWII were plans to use hidden radio transmitters to aim the primitive cruise missiles. The idea was that agents were put the transmitters to target. And then the primitive missiles like V-1 or V-2, or radio-controlled  B-17 bombers that carried internal warheads would fly to the target.

There is the possibility that the North Korean nuclear weapons are using the guidance system which bases the radio transmitters that are left near the target area. The idea is that this system can activate just before the attack. And then the missile can hit the target with very high accuracy. The ECM system can jam the signal. But the operators must know the frequency for counteractions. 

In those systems, the agents are leaving the transmitter in the target area. This type of radio transmitter can be activated by radio signals transmitted by the radio system on the homing head of missiles. When the radio signal hits the targeting transmitter, that thing starts to send the aiming signal to the missile. 

The Israeli air force used this type of targeting system in operation "Opera" for targeting its weapons. "Operation Opera" was an Israeli long-range air-strike the Iraqi nuclear reactor in the year 1981. In that strike, an Israeli agent put a little radio transmitter in the reactor room. And then that system sends the signal to aim missiles at the reactor. In that strike, the aircraft activated the aiming system by using the wake-up signal from the radar. And then the weapons flew to that signal. 

In the modern versions, the mobile telephone can use in this type of aiming system. The idea is that this type of system can use without the GPS. To the battlefield would put quadcopters that are equipped with led-lights or radio transmitters. And then the attack aircraft will shoot homing projectiles that are using those systems for aiming themselves. 

I other versions agent or quadcopter will put the mobile telephone on the target, and then the nuclear missile would aim to that point. The thing that makes this type of system very hard to detect is that the tracking signal can activate just before the strike is coming. The activator can be at the nose of an incoming missile. In this case, the missile must know only about the location of the transmitter. It can fly by using an inertial navigation system. When it would turn to return trajectory the radio system activates the aiming transmitter. 

()https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9996779/North-Korea-reveals-TRAIN-based-missile-fired-two-missiles-Japan-week.html

()https://www.nknews.org/2021/09/north-korea-tested-new-train-launched-ballistic-missile-system-kcna/

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Opera

()https://networkedinternet.blogspot.com/

Gyrojet pistols and rifles -the attempt to make rocket projectile for handguns

13 mm. Gyrojet pistol
Picture I

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/p/gyrojet-pistols-and-rifles-attempt-to.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Gyrojet pistols and rifles were created in 1960's for using the rocket ammunition. The orderer of that unique weapon was United States military and the use of rocket ammunition would eliminate the shell of the cartridge, and that could cover the shooting point, what would give the dogs smell of those soldiers. The Gyrojet-weapons were meant for special forces, what would have troubles with the shells. The ammunition would accelerate after leaving the barrel, and that would make those weapons very effective.


One of the reasons for creating this weapon was the idea, that by using rocket ammunition would the pistol and rifle have the same firepower, and also the solution, where the same weapon fits all purposes would be attractive. In some solutions, the gyrojet would equip with the extended barrel and the removable stock, what would give the same accuracy to that gun, as the rifle has. This would remove the need for two guns and ammunition, what makes loading the gun easier. And because the same weapon fits different missions it would be suitable for special forces operators, who spent weeks behind the enemy lines.



And if the weapon should carry as the sidearm and sort range purposes, those extended barrels and stocks could be removed. This Gyrojet solution was the fiasco, as you might know, and the manufacturing of this weapon stopped in 1960's. But after that have been rumors, that military forces have tested Gyrojet-type rocket bullets, what are loaded with the standard ammunition. In this solution, the rocket ammunition would be used with standard assault rifles.



The diameter of that rocket would be same as the bullet, and when the assault rifle would be launched, the shell would be thrown away as the standard ammunition. The rocket ammunition would give more sensitive acceleration for ammunition, and that would make it suitable for smart bullets. Those bullets are actually miniature missiles, what would home to target with the miniature computer. And the aiming for those bullets happens with lasers. The structure of those smart bullets are the same as guided "Copperhead" ammunition, but they are smaller. That ammunition is planned to use in the positions like hostage rescue and anti-sniper operations. In those cases, the nano-robot would mark the target with the laser ray, and then the ammunition will take the target off.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyrojet

Film I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJAXpyt8-oQ

Film II

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdW8Trh_MGg&t=46s


Picture I

https://modernfirearms.net/userfiles/images/handguns/usa/1/1287739508.jpg