When an anomaly turns normal.

 When an anomaly turns normal. 

In this text. The term “secret society” means an isolated group of people. Or, a group that has hostile attitudes against outsiders. Those groups don’t want outsiders to see their rituals and everyday life. And, they operate outside the public surveillance. That means some gangs, and especially MC-gangs and organized crime like the Mafia, are a secret society. Monasteries, isolated hospitals, and prisons can also form societies with rules and abilities that are foreign to us. 

These people must follow orders and code very carefully, or they face punishment. The code in those societies might be stricter than the army's code.  Because people are not allowed to see things that happen behind walls. That rises to conspiracy theories. But sometimes the truth is stranger than the story. The North Korean regime is one of the most powerful societies in the world. That regime has certain rules, and if somebody breaks them. That causes death. 

The image above shows the abandoned mental hospital, Kellokoski, Finland. Mental hospitals are one example of the places where things that are abnormal or condemnable turn normal. In the same way, when we think about things like some MC-gangs, there are things that outside society will not accept. For us, society is the place where laws and official authorities determine what is normal behavior. 

 Or they don’t determine normality. They determine things that are allowed. When people are in a closed society, they are surrounded by people. With a certain ideology. Or a certain way to think about things, like what is right or wrong. Closed societies are always preventive, against outside influence. And things that bring them outside influence are outsiders. 

And that is one thing that connects all closed societies. They think that the outsiders are enemies who want to destroy their lifestyle. Closed societies always involve hierarchy. That means higher-ranking members of the society have the right to give orders to members at lower ranks. Those who have a duty to follow those orders. Another thing is that. 

The higher-ranking members are always at the middle of the system. And its hierarchy. When a higher-ranking member wants to get out, there is always a circle of henchmen. Many people believe that a secret society is like some kind of army. A secret society, like Hell’s Angels or the Mafia, is an organization. That has certain ceremonies to select its members. Those ceremonies might be very humbling. 

Same way. Basic training in the army is not the best time in people’s lives. But the biggest difference between some MC gangs and the army is this. The MC gang memberships are open only for people who please the elder members. All MC-gang members have similar opinions. They have the same attitudes. And that forms a suitable environment for encouragement and radicalism. 

Because all of those people are similar, that means they all react to the same provocation in the same way. When somebody starts to encourage others. That can cause a domino effect. And people start to keep racing to tell. How did they all face disrespectful behavior? In those gangs, the women are a status, who are reserved for the higher-ranking gang members. 

In the army, there are always people. And there, people must not share their personal merchandise. Those who do not have the same opinions about things. They must follow orders. And there are rules. About the admissions requirements. 

But another fact is that tank men and tank leaders have different admission requirements than paratroopers. And they don’t have to respect their superior officers as persons. They must follow orders and respect those superior officers. As governmental representatives. In the same way as the government wants people to respect police and other law enforcement authorities as the government’s representatives, not as private persons. 

The army is not a secret society. There are certain rules for making things. There is enough that the person follows the orders. The secret society acts like an army. If we look at it from the outside. But the key element is that those people always have homogeneous backgrounds. There is a possibility that those people who are members of the most violent gangs have a long criminal history that has continued over generations. Their parents could also be gang members, or something in their environment taught them that crimes are an accepted way to earn money. 

Artificial bacteria are the biggest hope and the biggest threat.

   Artificial bacteria are the biggest hope and the biggest threat. 

Artificial bacteria are not. Like natural bacteria.  

DNA and mRNA are tools that can rewrite a cell's genetic code. That means the cell changes its shape and then starts to make different things than the original cells. The ability to program cells is an opportunity. And threat. The ability to remove hereditary diseases from the human body. The problem is that the same technology allows researchers to make  more perfect lifeforms. Than natural organisms. Artificial life normally means bacteria. Created using genetic reprogramming. In that case, the DNA bits will be collected and connected into the new form. That allows researchers to create bacteria that create antibiotics and spider silk, which is the strongest material in nature. 

Bacteria can be reprogrammed to search and destroy cancer cells. And probably, genetically engineered cells can form tissues for the bioprinters. Reprogrammed bacteria can also make it possible to create a large mass of things like skin. In that case, bacteria are on the nutrient platform, and the system just changes the DNA in their nucleus. Theoretically is possible to create anaerobic bacteria. That releases oxygen into blood vessels. That kind of anaerobic, biological oxygen synthesis is one of the most fascinating things in biotechnology. 

The ability to create artificial bacteria allows researchers to create new types of biological weapons. The same thing. That allows bacteria to search and destroy cancer cells. Allows weaponized bacteria to find things. Like neural structures or the blood vessel wall. And then attack those vital tissues. That kind of bacteria is very dangerous. There is a possibility. The bacteria themselves copy the targeted person’s cell antigens into themselves. And another dangerous thing is that. Those bacteria can destroy themselves after a certain time. When we think about the perfect, artificial organisms, we must realize that those organisms can turn the “Alien” movie monsters into reality. 

There can be infectious bacteria that can create things. Like the HIV virus at the same time. That allows those bacteria to destroy the immune defense at the same time. Here, we must remember that artificial bacteria are made. Connecting DNA bits together.  It is not like natural bacteria. That means those bacteria can make things. That is not possible for natural bacteria. 

Researchers can create artificial organisms, and the same technology that makes bacteria resistant to poisons can turn them resistant to antibiotics. When we think about aliens, we might think of a very complicated lifeform. from outer space. The fact is that the term “alien” means something non-natural. Biolaboratory can create aliens that nothing can resist. Those aliens are not like humans; they are microscopic organisms. Those creatures can be a fast-increasing bacterial population. Those bacteria can look like hospital bacteria. 

The thing that protects us against immune-resistant super bacteria is their complicated form. Their population will not increase fast enough to it can cause problems outside the hospitals. Natural bacteria destroy those organisms very fast. The biggest threat is the super bacteria that can increase their population too fast. If antibiotics cannot destroy those bacteria. They can cause problems. 

https://futurism.com/scientists-synthetic-lifeform-syn57

Images: Futurism.com

Superficialism is a big threat to people.

   Superficialism is a big threat to people. 

If you let AI make decisions for you, blame yourself. Who is responsible, if we offer our free will and ability to criticize some machine? When we follow the orders that the machine gives, we offer our free will to the machine.

The Internet and modern society favor superficial people. People who deliver their ability to think to some machines. When we process the information we receive, we might ask ourselves if we truly think and process that data? Or do we simply click the homepage, search for about three seconds, and then move to another homepage? Do we even read more than some titles from homepages? Can you, or I, draw some conclusions using those titles? And then, do we move to some more interesting homepages? When we search for things on the net. We can search only for homepages that please us. That is one way to see things. 

If we just follow the instructions that the AI gives. We give leadership to the machine. If we never ask why AI makes something, we lose our way to introduce criticism. If we just follow orders and be quiet, that means nobody even knows that we have some different opinions. We can think what we want, but the thing is, how can we share those opinions with other people? 

When people are worrying about things like reading books, we must dare to ask one thing. When did you go to the library? And lend some books?  When your boss said to you that you can keep a couple of hours free to go to the library and search for information in those books? Or do we lend books that we can fill shelves? Using books? Or do we really open those books and then concentrate on those things? And when we spent our lunch break discussing books that we read? The decision is ours. Maybe we read books. Maybe we read texts from computer screens. But if we want to share our opinions with other people. There is always something more interesting. 

There are two ways to think about things. 

1) We can notice that something has happened. 

2) We can notice that something has happened, and then ask why that thing happens. 

We must realize that people always lead governments and nations. When somebody talks about value-based realism, we should ask: 

Whose values? Whose realism? Or, who describes our values and realism? Or things that we tell outside as values and realism? Are those things serving only the majority? And when we defend some minorities, we must realize that those things can also serve something. We can use things like racism as an excuse to kick our competitors. So, when something comes to the newspapers and their headlines, we must ask ourselves, why did that thing become so important, just in that moment?

Things like sports and some lone island survivor reality TV are more interesting than some ideas that some writer introduced a long time ago. When we sit at our desks in our workplace. We must be quiet so that we don’t disturb other people. So we just sit, look at the screen, and be careful not to disturb our workmates. Is that the environment where it is easy to share opinions and offer analytical thoughts to people? 

But otherwise, why can’t we tell our opinions to other people? That is the thing that. We must realize, before we introduce some criticism. If we just sit and look at things. That might look something. We cannot accept; we can follow two routes. We can sit quietly, and then other people say that we have nothing to say. We can share our opinions with other people. When we face social media, we must understand one thing. Many people misuse that tool. They introduce opinions that we cannot understand or accept. And we have our free will. We can read things that we know are false. We can remove that false information by closing social media accounts. Follow the official media. 

And then we face a thing. Maybe we disagree with the opinions or things that official media shares. Maybe we have better knowledge than the reporter, but then how can we say that to people who read those  articles? Maybe we should write that in newspaper opinion pieces. But what if they don’t publish that thing? Journalists are also human. That means the journalist has their background, opinions, and other things. That always affects people's way of thinking and writing. When we use AI, we forget. That AI uses datasets. Collected by humans. Humans make decisions about what the AI should give and what it should not give to people who use it. 

Thinking is not enough. We must have the ability to say something. If we just sit and look at the music videos, we must realize that people never see our opinions. That is enough for people like Kim Jong-Un. People can have their opinions. But they must follow the regime. They are not allowed to say or write things that are against the regime. So, does the regime somehow deny Western people the way to introduce critical opinions in public media? We remember that critical workers were gifted to the company. People celebrated those people as heroes. 

But then we might ask, how critical are those employees really? Did they criticize their henchmen or their leaders? Today, we say that social media kills that kind of criticism. Where employees say that they see something that is right, using evidence-based arguments. Criticism without justification is not  effective way to effect. If there is no evidence. That kind of criticism is easy to knock out. But when we want to introduce criticism, we must remember that it’s easier to criticize a henchman using authority than to give critical feedback to the superior. 

AI doesn’t make U-turns.

   AI doesn’t make U-turns. 

   

We don’t always make our best move. That means we don’t always choose the fastest way to travel between two points. We simply might like another route. We might like things that we see while we travel some other, slower route. And that is inhumane. The AI always predicts that we choose the fastest and most economical route. AI thinks that we don’t look at things like old houses. AI always predicts that we travel to some other place using the fastest route. It believes that we want to make journeys in the shortest time possible. It doesn’t think that somebody chooses a longer route, because that person wants to improve fitness. 

And that is the thing that differs AI from us. 

The difference between the human and AI approach to playing games like chess is this. The AI never plays anything for fun. Or the AI will never “kill time” with games. When humans play chess, sometimes we just move pieces on the chessboard and think of other things. AI always “thinks” that we play games to win. Not just to kill time, when we wait for things like a weekly meeting. This is one of the differences between AI and humans. When AI tries to predict things like interactions in nature. It makes things better than humans. The reason for that is simple. Everything that happens in nature happens in a linear way. When action happens. A reaction follows that action. When snow starts to fall on the slopes, that action continues until the avalanche reaches the bottom of the valley. The avalanche follows the laws of nature. It will not change its mind and start to travel backwards. 

And that is the difference between avalanches and humans. Humans can change minds. When a human starts to walk across the street, that doesn’t mean that the human will go to the other side of that street.  Humans can change their minds and make a U-turn. This is the thing. That makes human nature unpredictable. And that is one thing that evolution is made for: protecting species. And that makes humans difficult prey. When some animals hunted humans. We can run to the thing that seems like a dead end. And then put their spears against attacking animals. This way of making something unpredictable. Makes it hard to predict human behavior. 

AI follows the same marks as human psychologists when they try to read humans’ feelings. The ability to use special sensors to see how blood pressure and adrenaline levels rise. If the AI doesn’t have those sensors, it must follow body language. And the way a person speaks. In those cases, the sensor systems that the AI can use. Mean as much as AI itself. If the AI can use lie detectors. It is not very hard to make an algorithm that uncovers lies.  In that case, sensors mean more than an algorithm. 

When we see cases where somebody cheats people who serve as royal guards, we know that thing makes those people angry. Those people, with ultimate strength, can hide that emotion. We might be very angry. But in some cases. We don’t tell this to other people. Animals never hide their emotions. When human turns angry against a superior force. That means humans might not attack. Humans can flee from the field and wait for a better moment to strike. That is one of the things that makes us the ultimate species. 

Let’s go back to the chess game. The algorithm predicts that we always make the best move. And this is the algorithm’s ultimate strength. And that is the algorithm’s ultimate weakness. We might think of cases where a boxer faces many practice opponents. That boxer can win all of them easily. But then in the title fight, the opponent knocks out our boxer. In that case, we forget that. Some boxers can lose their training matches because they bet on that opponent. This means the training opponent can lose matches that nobody sees. But when there is a kind of meaning. That a person can fight differently. This is the thing that AI doesn’t always understand. Humans can save their best moves for the places where those moves mean something. So, we can think about different things than what we make. 

Gravitational waves and quantum models II

 Gravitational waves and quantum models II

So what put the gravitational field into motion? That is one of the most interesting things in the universe. When the gravitational center sends gravitational waves, those G-waves transport energy out from the field near the gravitational center. We can simply think that the energy fields are weaker near the gravitational center than at a longer distance. So stronger energy fields travel into the gravitational center. The gravitational center can bind other fields around it. Every time the gravitational center sends a gravitational wave, it makes space for other fields to travel into the gravitational center. 

Another way is that the gravitational center simply transports gravitational fields in a certain direction. In that model. Some string that can travel through the gravitational center can pull that field into one direction. The fact is this as long as a particle evaporates, that causes a gravitational effect. But when the particle’s evaporation ends. That causes the gravitational field will not pull particles and fields to the particle. When a particle evaporates or turns into a wave movement. It leaves space to other fields that try to fill that hole. That makes energy and particles travel to that gravity center. 

If we think that dark matter is the strange gravitational effect, we can think that there is some kind of lower energy point in those gravitational centers. That gravitational center can form when some kind of skyrmion, or some other thing, forms the lower energy point. Another thing that can form the strange gravitational effect called dark matter can be the skyrmion series. That can form around the quantum-sized black hole’s relativistic jet or relativistic string. Those skyrmions can move the quantum field like a piston. That can form an electromagnetic shadow behind those skyrmions. That means that other fields around those shadows or lower energy points start to fall into those electromagnetic vacuums. That thing makes a similar effect to gravity. 

And that point can be unbelievable. There is a possibility that free gravitons or free axions can form dark matter. But it is also possible that the dark matter is the condensed particles that are colder than 3K, or maybe those particles are colder than the energy minimum in the universe. That requires that those particles come from outside the universe. Or, that is the only explanation that could explain this hypothesis. 

See also

Gravitons

Skyrmions

Gravitational waves and quantum models.

Gravitational waves and quantum models. 

Gravitational waves are a wave movement or radiation. That moves gravitational fields. The problem with gravitational waves is how they can pull particles into the gravitational center. The answer can be that small strings can form those gravitational waves. Those small strings can spin in one direction, and that thing drives fields that the gravity wave penetrates to the gravity center. There is also a possibility that if the superstring theory is right, the waves or small skyrmions that travel at the superstring’s shell push those particles to the gravitational centers. Which one is the correct answer? 

That depends on the gravitational wave or wave structure’s position. If those waves are horizontally crossing the object, those strings can push fields through that structure that could look like a little bit of an egg cutter, where wires cut the egg in bites. In the second model, the string goes lengthwise through the object. In that case, when a black hole or the gravity center sends a gravity wave, it evaporates. In that case, the structure that evaporates pulls those strings into it. 

The gravity wave itself is like an energy ditch. That travels in space-time. The energy ditch forms when the G-(Gravity)field travels through other energy fields. That gravity field takes other fields with it. So the idea is similar to how some strings travel through the wave. If the string goes through the wave in the opposite direction, it pulls the wave energy into it. And if there is enough time, that string will turn wave backward. The gravity wave is a ditch in the energy field that travels to the gravity center. 

That makes energy travel faster to the gravity center. So how can energy travel in the wrong direction? The gravity wave is actually a stronger point in the gravity field. When the gravity center pulls other fields around it. Those fields pull particles with them. A gravitational wave is a space-time phenomenon. That which the field travels faster or carries particles stronger than otherwise. Or actually, gravity is waves. And gravity waves travel all the time across the universe. But sensors see only the strongest gravity waves. Those waves form when black holes collide. 

The Answer is in the field interaction. Every single fundamental interaction (electromagnetism, weak nuclear force, strong nuclear force, gravity) is a wave movement. Otherwise, we can say that each fundamental interaction is like radiation. Every fundamental interaction has a unique wavelength in that radiation, or wave movement. So, when the black hole, or some other gravity center, sends gravity waves, it sends G-field waves. When those waves push the gravity field away. That causes the effect that other energy fields try to fill that hole. This thing causes an effect that we call gravity. 

Our knowledge of black holes is expanding.

  Our knowledge of black holes is expanding.

 

"Researchers believe that an odd pair of merging black holes first detected in 2019 were "dancing" around a third supersized singularity that was lurking in the background. (Image credit: CNAS/SHAO)" (LiveScience, Scientists think they detected the first known triple black hole system in the universe — and then watched it die)

       

Researchers believe. They found the first triple black hole system. And if that is true. It proves that black holes can form similar systems. To “regular”stars form. In some visions, black holes can form entire galaxies. Those three black holes are going to their end. There is one supermassive and two smaller black holes.  Black holes can hijack each other. Or massive stars in the same star system can form a group of black holes. A black hole’s relativistic jet can also press things like planets into black holes. There are no observations about that kind of black hole. But theoretically, high-energy jets can raise the energy level in the planet’s atmosphere so high that the energy in its atmosphere can press it into one entirety.     

Our understanding of black holes is continually expanding. Due to new observation models and fundamental mathematical and computational tools, such as quantum computers and AI, we can develop new models of the most fascinating phenomena in the universe. In the past, we thought that black holes were only destroyers. When information fell into a black hole. That means the information is gone forever. But today we think differently. The key element in quantum mechanics is that information cannot just vanish. Information can only change its form. A black hole  rolls information into it. In the yarn ball model, a black hole rolls information into its event horizon like the strings or wires. Those wires store information that the black hole releases as wave movement. 

When we look at the black hole’s event horizon, we would see that thing waving. When those waves move up and down, they send waves to space. When the wave pushes the quantum field around the event horizon and falls back, it leaves a small quantum vacuum between the event horizon. And the quantum field around it. That pulls energy or information out from the black hole. When a black hole's event horizon separates from the whirl around it, it allows it to send a wave burst. The black hole is an interaction. If the outside whirl that includes quantum fields and material is removed, the black hole will be destroyed. 

The black hole’s evaporation causes a similar effect to what ice makes when we transport it into the room. When a black hole evaporates, energy field. That comes from outside, try to fill that space. So what if black hole’s evaporation ends? What if a black hole sometimes reaches energy stability with space around it? That can cause a situation where energy or a quantum field don’tt move to the black hole. Or out of it. That thing can turn a black hole completely invisible. And that causes a wild theory that maybe dark matter could be black holes that almost reach energy stability with their environment. 

Black holes are like gravitational solitons. They are packed gravitational wave packages. Like impacting, identical laser beams or identical acoustic waves can form solitons. Gravitational waves that impact with each other can form a gravitational soliton. 

Today, we think that the black hole evaporates. In that process black hole releases information that is stored in the form of Hawking radiation. Or, in the form of gravitational waves. So can the black hole have hair? Maybe a black hole has so-called soft hair, or maybe it’s partially bald. The black hole’s hair means strings that transport information out from that structure. The black hole is not completely smooth. There are small hills and valleys in its structure. If a black hole were to be completely smooth, that means that it could not touch the fields around it. Those small hills and valleys would play an important role in black hole interactions. 

Those small hills and valleys form when a black hole forms. And supernova energy presses those particles into one entirety. Called a singularity. Electrons that orbit atoms will be smashed against the atom's nucleus. And they leave at the shell of that thing as the quantum-sized hills and valleys. There are also models where there are no singularities. Singularities can explain some black holes. Things like the Kugelblitz theory suggest. Black holes can form from the energy fields or wave movement. In that case, something starts to transport energy out from a certain point. And then energy or wave movement that comes from around tries to fill that point. This thing could prove superstring theory. 

That means black holes are like gravitational solitons. When gravity fields start to travel against each other. That effect locks wave movement in the gravitational wave soliton. Can that soliton be stable? That depends on the energy that whirls around it. If that gravitational soliton can form a whirl that is large enough that it cannot let energy or wave movement travel out from that soliton, that makes it stable. Maybe not all black holes are similar. Some of them might have a singularity. And some of them might not have that thing. Black holes are not destroyers. 

They store information in them. In new models, there can even be universes inside black holes. And in wildest models, our universe exists in a black hole. In this model, we cannot see the black hole’s event horizon because it's too far away. In some models, there is also a shockwave inside the event horizon that covers the event horizon itself. And when information travels through that event horizon, it stretches those waves. And anyway, the black hole is surrounded by a material disk. That covers things that are outside that thing. 

There is a possibility that our universe formed when a black hole from the previous universe detonated. Those new models are tools that can open the biggest mystery in the universe. Black holes can offer a solution for information paradoxes. And answer how the universe formed. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soliton

The ability to control the mind can be an ultimate training method. But it can also open the darkest visions of dictatorship.

 The ability to control the mind can be an ultimate training method. But it can also open the darkest visions of dictatorship. 

Brightest innovations have darkest sides. That is the thing. That we should somehow learn. This is the thing. That people like Fritz Haber are shown to us. The same person who created ammonia synthesis and made fertilized irrigation possible created chemical weapons that killed millions in the First World War. In the same way. Things like artificial intelligence and brain-implanted microchips are tools. That can make many good things. But those systems can also control things like killer robots. And that means we must realize that all of those systems have two sides, bright and dark. 

The ability to control consciousness and decode thoughts is a tool. That has always fascinated people. The CIA and other intelligence agencies studied those things for a very long time. And an idea is to create a spy who doesn’t know being a spy. The person would walk into the office. And read documents and other things. And then that person goes to the safe place. And after the mark, that person can repeat everything that this person saw and heard. The idea is to use humans as walking recorders who don’t know that they are spies. 

The BCI system can make this thing possible. Brain circuits store information in the microchip, and then that system decodes that data in a safe place. 

That makes them pass things like lie detectors and even sodium amytal interrogation. In some other visions, the consciousness control can be used to hide top-secret technology. What if the operator can make missions using highly classified systems? And then that person will not remember anything. And any details about the missions and equipment are lost in their memories. The ability to control memories is a tool that can have many roles in the future. Controlled memories. Or, so-called synthetic memories are tools that can be used to train complicated things very fast. 

And that thing can save human lives. If a person is in trouble in remote areas. And the only person who can give first aid is person who lacks the needed skills, those systems can offer those skils in a very short time. Those systems can teach complicated algorithms to people, and they can make many things that we don’t even think about possible. Brain implants can be used to teach people things like karate. When we think about things like mind manipulation. We must realize one thing. In the wrong hands, those systems are extremely dangerous. 

When Brain-Computer Interfaces, BCI systems operate with people, they interact with the computer directly through the brain lobes. That means the mind cannot separate data, or information that it gets from the BCI, from information that the person’s own senses will send. And that is the danger of the BCI, that it is a very powerful tool. The BCI can cause a singularity where people are connected with the AI and each other. By those kinds of systems. In the worst cases, the system destroys personality and turns people into a homogenous mass of information. The biggest problem with the BCI-controlled computers is that. A person will not separate what is real and what is a cyber dream. That means the person can simply forget to sit on the computer and then die because of a lack of food and drinking. 

The biggest problem is this: the person. Hackers can target the users of wireless BCI connections. This thing makes remote extortion possible. The same system also offers a way to communicate using brain waves. That thing is called technical telepathy. Technical telepathy is thing that allows a person to control robots and other things using brain-implanted microchips. Those robots send information to the controller’s brain that handles that information. Like it comes from the senses. These kinds of systems are created to control bionic prostheses. But they can also control robots and other things. 

https://www.livescience.com/17449-matrix-inception-brain-manipulation.html

https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/research/a63149552/pentagon-psychic-spies/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004223007526

Species hybrides.

  Species hybrides. 

The Chinese researchers transplanted human neurons to mice. 

This kind of research is possible in countries like China. If those experiments are accepted. Or seen as useful by governments, that means that those tests are well-authorized. The human neurons in the mouse's brain make it possible to research those neuron reactions in certain situations. That gives researchers more information on how things happen between neurons. But that also makes it possible to make things like intelligent puppies. Those genetically engineered pets can make people's lives easier. They can offer help to people. Who have certain limitations. 

Staling and his idea of humanzees, the monkey soldiers, still live in memories. The humanzee-soldiers were suitable for Stalin’s ideology. He wanted soldiers who don’t think. Their purpose was only to serve his personal ideas. And that means they should not think of anything else than how to serve the “Father sunshine”. Stalin wanted robots, not humans. The only accepted morality and ethics in Stalin’s Soviet Union were what Stalin wanted. The only accepted ethics was to follow the rules of the secret police and Joseph Stalin. And the only purpose of research and life was to serve the nation and Stalin himself. 

But the intelligent pets are not the only thing that makes this kind of research very interesting. Intelligent animals can perform many jobs for the military and law enforcement. But those intelligent pets are also key to Stalin’s mad dream about monkey soldiers. Those monkey soldiers were soldiers who had monkey brains. And Stalin’s notorious operator in that idea was Ilya Ivanov (1870-1932). That person transplanted a dog's head between two individuals. Ivanov had no knowledge of the immune system.  

That made those visions of the humanzee useless. But today, technology allows researchers to create hybrid species. And maybe the horrifying visions of the humanzees live in some dictator's head. Today, there is a possibility. To connect DNA bites from different species. And that makes those things that Ivanov tested possible.

And those experiments included the cases where an animal’s head was cut off and a life support system kept that head alive. During 20s technology was very primitive. But when we think about today’s bionic systems. It's possible to connect a human or monkey head to a robot body. The robot will be connected to the robot by using the spinal cord. The computer in the robot's body transforms neural signals into the computer-controlled servo systems that move the robot's body. These kinds of things can be fascinating and notorious things. The ability to transplant human neurons to mice or dogs is the thing. That can transform. Our way to see things. 

"Chrysalis could house several generations until it enters Alpha Centauri, where it could shuttle people to the surface of the planet Proxima Centuri b. (Image credit: Giacomo Infelise, Veronica Magli, Guido Sbrogio', Nevenka Martinello and Federica Chiara Serpe​)" LiveScience, Proposed spacecraft could carry up to 2,400 people on a one-way trip to the nearest star system, Alpha Centauri)

Chrysalis, a theoretical generation ship to Alpha Centauri. 

The interstellar flight requires advanced biotechnology. If there is a disease. That requires immediate and effective reactions. Those people who will go on that journey must not have any social relationships with people on  Earth. They must not have any genetic weakness that can cause mental illnesses. And they must have a strong immune system that can clean their body in the case of infections. When those people go, they go forever. 

Another interesting thing is that researchers are starting to create space mouse babies. Those rodents will be born and grow in a microgravity environment. These kinds of experiments can give a boost to our way across the solar system or even to stars. There are models that some researchers call “Solar Warden”. In that model, in the future, there will be space humans who live their entire life in a microgravity environment. They will be born in spacecraft or space stations that travel around the solar system. 

Those people will ever visit to Earth and they spend their entire life in zero gravity. That kind of thing will happen. If we someday send humans to other solar systems. If we send a generation ship to Alpha Centauri, that journey takes 400 years. So, if we send that craft on that trip, we will never see those people again. There are generations between us and those colonists. But before we send that craft called “Chrysalis” on that one-way trip, we must change our culture. “Chrysalis” is a theoretical plan to create an interstellar spacecraft. But maybe someday. We will handle that technology. 

But the biggest problem is that those people who travel in that craft will also lose contact with Earth. Those people will spend their entire life in that craft. So the Earth will become very distant to those colonists who travel between Earth and Alpha Centauri. The Chrysalis takes 400 years for that trip. That means if the Alpha Centauri civilization sends this kind of generation ship to Earth. And that craft arrives tomorrow, they should send that thing in the 17th century. If that trip takes exactly 400 years, that hypothetical craft will be sent in the year when Cassini was born and King Charles 1 ruled England. The 30-year war began a couple of years earlier.

https://www.livescience.com/space/space-exploration/proposed-spacecraft-could-carry-up-to-2-400-people-on-a-one-way-trip-to-the-nearest-star-system-alpha-centauri

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3322054/chinese-scientists-transplant-human-brain-cells-mice-boosting-pleasure-levels

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanzee

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilya_Ivanov

Two films about Ivanov and his dark ideas. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2ius0Qw4Ek&t=323s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6HRK9Xc4eU

AI’s advancement turns slower.

    AI’s advancement turns slower.

Growing accuracy requires more complicated code. That causes a situation where AI’s advancement slows. When developers created some pseudo-AI tool in a couple of hours in the 1980s, those programs required about 10-50 lines of code. Those programs asked “what's your name?” and then they output the name that the user gave. Then they might ask, “Is the sun shining”? And then the user could answer “yes” or “no”. Then the program replied with something that gave good things in the user’s mind. Today, AI algorithms require billions of code lines. And that causes a situation where the advancement slows. 

So, when accuracy grows in program advancement slows. 

AI’s advancement turns slower. When its accuracy grows. And that means the AI follows the line of the limits in mathematics. Term limits mean the equation that’s the curve approaches zero endlessly. But that curve never reaches zero. If we translate this mathematical equation into an AI model, we can say that when AI approaches human level, the advancement slows down. Maybe. The AI will never reach a complete human level for programmers, but it will reach a level that is almost human-level intelligence. So the base elements in the AI are easy to make.

Then, researchers should find something more accurate. At the same time, they must find new, complicated ways to train their AI. And that means there is a need for more complicated algorithms. Those algorithms require more power, more time, and more accuracy. This means that the programmers use more and more time. That developers can  create more complicated code for algorithms. And how they should react. When accuracy grows. The sector of their algorithm can work turn smaller in the same time. When the need for accuracy grows, the speed of programming slows. 

And the next thing is that the error detection must be at a level where the system can be trusted. Another thing. What slows AI’s advancement is the calculation power. The system needs the entire data center for every query. That means the system needs so much calculation power that developers have no money to buy the systems that they need. Complicated code requires high-power, very high-accuracy systems. And when the system requires lots of capacity for the smallest duties. 

That causes a situation where the developers don’t have time to use AI as they need. When some details keep the system busy, it has no time to drive new code. Complicated code requires a complicated- and long-term error-detection process. The human coder cannot check even billions of lines of computer code. The entire human lifetime is not enough for that process if the human coder wants to make that thing without automated tools. 

The newest tool in robotics is “pregnancy robots” that carry artificial wombs.

 The newest tool in robotics is “pregnancy robots” that carry artificial wombs. 

Is this ethical? We can discuss that thing forever. Can a woman who wants children but cannot get them use a robot to get babies, or should they rather rent a womb? And then. We can take a closer look at the Chinese government’s ethical and moral values. Then we can just say China is ahead of the West in that kind of technology. And we know what these systems can make. They can give new composers. Like new Mozart. Or they can give supersoldiers to Kim Jong Un’s army. 

Chinese researchers developed a robot with an artificial womb. Those “pregnancy robots” can give birth to humans. That thing can revolutionize family planning and many other aspects. Robots with artificial wombs can be the next step for humans, but it is also an ultimate platform for genetic engineering. These kinds of systems are offering the ultimate possibility for eugenic research and allow the creation of genetically engineered humans. 

Normally, we think that genetically engineered humans are making positive things. We see them as a gift to parents who want to shine with their children. But we must remember that the human mind can be a dark and frightening place. Those genetically engineered humans can be the great composers, chemists, and doctors who save the world. 

But the same creatures can also operate as super soldiers. The thing that makes this ability even more dangerous than we can imagine is the brain implants. Those microchips allow the controller to control soldiers. With ultimate accuracy. The same microchip can also be used to teach them skills in seconds that other people learns in years. 

Another thing is that nobody knows what the future brings. Researchers are creating models of the generation ships. That's travel to Alpha Centauri in about 400 years. There is a model where  those colonists can be sent on that journey as frozen embryos. Those embryos can be in those “mother robots”. The robot could freeze them to a certain temperature. That is close to 0K. 

In the future, Robots with artificial wombs or “mother robots” could become an ultimate possibility for humans. For interstellar travel. Those robots can freeze embryos in their wombs. And when those robots arrive in the other solar system, like the Alpha Centauri system, they can start to grow their embryos. That means those colonists could be humans who grew and were taught by human-shaped robots. Those kinds of robots are the tools that can make many things possible. 

But when we create these kinds of tools, we must remember that all things. Those systems can give ultimate happiness to some families can also give ultimate power to the people who don’t care about anything. There are people. Those who do not follow regular moralistic ways of thinking. The ultimate wealth gives them the power to create things that regular people don’t even imagine. 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/china-firm-plans-world-s-first-pregnancy-humanoid-robot-using-artificial-womb/ar-AA1KAFab

https://nypost.com/2025/08/17/tech/pregnancy-robots-could-give-birth-to-human-children/

https://techweez.com/2025/08/18/chinese-robot-with-artificial-womb/

Happy 100-year birthday, quantum mechanics.

 Happy 100-year birthday, quantum mechanics. 

The GIF above this text introduces field interaction. When the outside field pushes the inner field, the inner field’s or structures' size will turn smaller. Until the pressure or energy level in it can break that process. Or the pressure or energy level turns so high that it can resist the outside field. 

It’s 100 years of quantum mechanics. In 1925, young scientists named Werner Heisenberg went to Helgoland Island and developed the concept of quantum mechanics. In Helgoland, he realized that all things in the universe are in interaction. There, that person realized that the sky is blue because some kind of particles hit it.

And then that thing caused shockwaves that we see as blue light. The blue light is so-called Cherenkov radiation. That radiation forms when a particle that travels speed of light hits the atmosphere. Those particles must slow their speed because the speed of light is lower in the atmosphere than outside the atmosphere. 

When a particle slows its speed, it must transfer its kinetic energy into its environment. When a particle hits the atmosphere. It sends a shockwave. The shockwave that we see as a photon is the thing that slows the particle's speed. When we think that the universe and all other systems are growing entropy, that means. We see that chaos is increasing in the system. But then we must wake up and make one decision. 

If the system is limited, any phenomena in it cannot be unlimited. And then we can see that entropy is not literally “chaos”. It's the thing that might look like chaos. But there can be repeating structures. Like in fractals. If researchers can someday find the order in the system’s entropy, they can calculate changes in its shape backward. And if those calculations are made right, they can uncover the shape of the original system. 

That makes this type of thing interesting. When a particle travels through the universe, it collects information from its environment. That information is on the particle like plague. And the problem is that. We cannot touch the particle. But if we could see the shape of the information that forms hills and potholes on the particle’s shell. If researchers know the route and entire systems. If the particle passes, it makes it possible to reorder that information. The problem is that near all stars, molecular nebulae, X- and gamma-ray bursts, and all other things involve quantum systems. 

The quantum fields in those systems are unique. And that makes this model theoretical. But if researchers know everything about the  particle’s route. They could restore information and see what things look like in that particle’s route. If that kind of thing is possible. That makes the quantum network possible. Data travels in a quantum network connected to particles. And if researchers can protect the data and calculate it back in the form. Where information was at the beginning of the particle’s journey. It allows sending bottle-post where information is stored in electrons. 

The ability to remove entropy. Makes it possible to see distant objects. And it can also allow researchers to transport information from the past to the future. Or from the future to the past. The black hole is the thing that can transport information from the future to the past. But the problem is that the entropy at the edge of the event horizon turns information into a mess that nobody understands. 

That entropy is like a series of whirls that mix information into a form. That makes no sense. But if researchers know how that border behaves and what kind of whirls there are. That allows them to re-order that information. That requires complete knowledge of the systems. And how those things behave in interaction. 

Neuralink microchips can eavesdrop on the neural system.

   Neuralink microchips can eavesdrop on the neural system. 

The Neuralink microchip is a tool. That can make paralyzed people live more fulfilling lives. Neuralin microchips are installed in the patient's brain. And they can be connected to the computers. That allows users to control the computer using their thoughts. That thing is a brain-computer interface (BCI). This connects the human brain straight to the net. That opens the path to control remote robots using EEG. Those systems' data security must be over the top. If those systems are hacked, the results can be devastating. 

That BCI interface allows a user to control the computers, mobile telephones, and all other electronics using that microchip. The computer is the key to controlling physical things. And that's why BCI is the key element to control physical tools. The idea of the BCI was introduced in the Graig Thomas novel "Firefox". In that novel and movie, the pilot controlled the super fighter's weapon systems using the BCI. 

The BCI system that allows the use of user interfaces using EEG is the tool that can make more than Graig Thomas's fictional system ever could. Firefox was written in 1977, and that means modern neuralink applications are bypassing that fiction. And the reality is turned more impressive than fiction. The AI and advanced data technology are turning fiction into fact. The AI-controlled microchips can transmit data to the brain. 

Darth Vader, a fictional character from the Star Wars movies, is one version of the human-robot hybrid. The BCI can make that thing possible. The bionic robot can be connected to the brain using the BCI. 

And that advances learning. The BCI system makes technical remote viewing possible. That happens by connecting those microchips to the surveillance cameras or robot bodies. The same system can allow people to transmit their sensorial data and other things to other people across the air. Those microchips have their ultimate risks. That risk is hacking. The AI-based systems can also use neuro-implanted mictochips to project a person's thoughts to the computer screen. 

The neuralink-type microchips that operate with Bluetooth allow the user to connect themselves. Straight into the internet using things like mobile telephones as sockets. The internet can make it possible for a person to transmit things like tastes, visual images, and the sense of touch over the net. 

The sense that the neuralink microchip transmits depends on the brain area where the chip is installed. That thing gives an ultimate experience that the brain cannot separate from personal experience. And that is the risk in those systems. Those microchips can also transmit things like other people's memories. Or maybe the AI can create synthetic memories that are the synthetic EEG curves. If those curves are sent to the right memory area in the brain. Our brain cannot separate those " synthetic memories" from real memories. 

The brain-implanted microchips are tools that can make things like a Darth Vader suit possible. Those microchips can control things like a bionic prosthesis. That thing means that the robot-human hybrids are possible. Brain-implanted microchips can make incredible things possible. But a technical advance can make it possible to use intelligent tattoos that are miniature microchips to communicate with the brain. Those very small microchips and antennas can give enough accuracy for the data transmission between the computer and neural structures. 

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/08/elon-musks-neuralink-launches-mind-control-chip-trials-in-uk-paralyzed-patients-become-human-guinea-pigs-in-this-shocking-experiment/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain%E2%80%93computer_interface

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefox_(novel)

What is life?

 What is life? 

What is life? That's the thing that the cosmobiologists and philosophers are thinking. We have an old description that life means the thing that is organic and can create descendants. That means the robot that can build a copy of itself acts like a living organism. The organism means a creature. That can create descendants. Defend itself. And react to stimuli.  So, if volcanoes erupt, the robot can run away. 

So the living organisms can make a copy of themselves. However, when we consider concepts like Von Neumann machines or self-replicating machines, we encounter issues that warrant reflection, such as robot factories being viewed as "living organisms." The fact is that the robot factory can create copies of robots that operate inside those factories. And the robot factory can create a copy of itself. The problem with the Von Neumann machines is that. Those machines operate as a whole. Whenever. The robot creates an identical copy of itself, which doubles the network-based solution calculating capacity. 

If it has orders on how to make the needed equipment. These kinds of things, like AI-controlled, self-replicating robots, are tools. That requires the re-estimation of life. In the same way. Things like self-replicating molecules can cause a new way to see life. Von Neumann machines are tools that can act like living organisms. They can strike back if something attacks them. And that makes those machines more complicated things than we ever imagined.

The primary question is: does life need some physical form? Or what is the physical form? Computer viruses and artificial intelligence are programs that can make everything more complicated than ever before. The complicated AI algorithms can generate a twin of themselves. The AI that can develop itself and jump between servers is the thing that can make descendants. In the same way, computer viruses can make descendants. 

Is a self-replicating computer program some kind of living organism? That thing is a group or series of electromagnetic impulses. Stored in the computer's mass memory. That thing is like a living organism, but the problem is that it has no physical form as we know it. Another thing is this: is an artificial cell a living organism? Researchers made that cell in a laboratory. The thing is that the cell eats nutrients from its environment. But that artificial cell can't decay. 

So, even if something can drink orange juice, it will not necessarily create descendants. And another thing is that. Every biological creature doesn't think. But otherwise, the primitive creature can make many complicated things if they are programmed into its DNA. The intelligence doesn't make a creature living or not living. Biorobots or artificial cells are things. That causes a need to re-estimate the line between living organisms and robots. 

Black holes, fractals, and G-field interaction.

  Black holes, fractals, and G-field interaction. 

"Illustration of two novel theories exploring dark matter origins through a mirror world and early universe horizon." (Rude Baguette, “Dark Matter May Come From A Mirror World”: Bold Theories Suggest Hidden Twin Universe And Particle Factory At The Edge Of The Young Cosmos)

There is a possibility that some conditions in black holes are similar to those in a hypothetical anti-universe. That means black holes can be the source of dark matter. But if that is true. That model requires. There is a small anti-universe, or an anti-universe-like space, in every black hole. And if the only thing that differs between the anti-universe and our universe is the direction of time, that means there can be a small anti-universe in the black holes. Time travels in the opposite direction in black holes. So, maybe there are anti-universe-type conditions, and maybe. Some part of dark matter, or mysterious gravitational effects, forms in black holes. 

The new interesting theory about the origin of dark matter in the anti-universe requires more thinking. The thing is that the dark matter formed in the anti-universe is somehow utopian. However, theoretically, there could be anti-universes or structures that behave like an anti-universe within our universe. Those places are black holes. Behind the event horizon, time should move backward. And that thing can form a small-sized mini-universe in the black hole. 

The problem is how those weakly interacting massive particles, WIMPs, hypothetical dark matter particles, can escape from the black holes? The black hole vaporization can cause those particles to escape from the black hole. All black holes are losing mass. During that thing, the black hole sends gravitational waves. So, there is a possibility. The gravitational waves form when hypothetical gravitons are left outside the event horizon. When a black hole loses its mass. The event horizon withdraws, and that causes particles like gravitons to be left outside it. 

Another way to think about the black hole vaporization is to think of the black hole as a whirl. That while it always interacts with its environment, as all other whirls do. That whirl causes friction in the medium between the whirl's internal and outside structure. That means the contact between those whirls and the outside environment causes small whirls that steal energy from the higher energy space or field. 

Above: A Fractal can introduce a model of how a black hole, or the whirl in the Gravity, or G-field, creates other whirls around it. When it interacts with the outside G-field. 

The idea is that. The G-field makes a whirl when it impacts with another G-field that moves in another direction. In the same way, water forms whirls into the points where water flows in opposite directions. 

So, if we think that time is also like wave movement, the time that moves backward behind the event horizon can form a whirl in time or 4th. Dimension in the point where time moves forward and backward. And that point is the black hole event horizon. 

When escape velocity turns higher than the speed of light. That means time turns to travel backwards. 

At the point where escape velocity reaches the speed of light, time stops. And then the time starts to travel in the opposite direction when escape velocity turns higher than the speed of light. So, there should be some kind of whirl in time. 

And if we think that a black hole is like a time arrow that moves back in time, that means it should push particles around it forward in time faster than otherwise. That means if we use the time arrow model for that case, the particle near the black hole's event horizon should turn "very light" so that it can fall to the future. That means the time arrow, or the arrow of time, should push particles in the opposite direction when it travels through the spacetime. But that is only a philosophical expansion of that model. 

In the black hole case, the whirl is like in a G-field. That whirl interacts with the G-field that is outside that black hole or dense gravity, or the G-field whirl. When those environments touch each other, that forms a whirl. And that means the event horizon is full of whirls that are lying. The whirl's center is horizontal to the event horizon. And they can drive energy out from a black hole.

In some other models, the event horizon is a layer that seems to be full of photons. Those photons might make it seem like a ball, made of car tyres. That means the gravitons can escape from the middle of those photons. Or they can send gravitational waves to gravitons outside the event horizon. The event horizon can also send whirls inside the event horizon, and that forms entropy in the black hole. 

The idea is that the G-field is an independent energy field. That G-field forms from gravity waves. In black holes, the G-field has a higher energy level than the G-field outside the black hole. That means the G-field travels outside the black hole. The G-field is one of the fields of four fundamental forces. Those forces are gravity, weak, and strong nuclear interactions. And electromagnetism. 

Those fields are independently interacting substances. And that means G-field can rise to a very high energy level, and that doesn't mean that other fields must rise their energy level. But if the G-field is at a very high energy level. Or its density is so high that it can push other fields from around it. In the same way, if the G-field spins fast enough, that thing doesn't let other fields in it. 

The whirl interacts like a wheel that lets material and wave movement travel through the black hole. There could be a superstring or energy string that travels through the center of the whirl. But then. Those whirls are pumping energy out from the black hole. The black hole can also form whirls that can separate from the event horizon. Those whirls are like small kugelblitz-black holes. There is a possibility. Those whirls just explode immediately after they separate from the event horizon. 

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/08/dark-matter-may-come-from-a-mirror-world-bold-theories-suggest-hidden-twin-universe-and-particle-factory-at-the-edge-of-the-young-cosmos/

https://scitechdaily.com/two-wild-new-theories-could-finally-explain-dark-matter/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle

Biomimetic drones can make a revolution in drone technology.

  Biomimetic drones can make a revolution in drone technology. 

"Illustration of a flapping-wing drone landing gently on a person's hand." (RudeBaguette, “Falcon-Like Drone Lands Softly On Your Palm”: Japan Team Says This Is The Future Of Flight)

Biomimetic technology gives drones new abilities. Small-sized drones that can flap their wings are the new tools for drone technology. Flapping-wing drones can land softly in the hand.  And they are less vulnerable than propellers. Flapping-wing drones can look like birds or insects. The insect-looking drone can slip into the house and then transmit discussions to its mothership. 

Those biomimetic drone systems can be the ultimate tools for surveillance and other types of missions. They can investigate how insects really live. And those systems can also observe people who are suspected of illegal activities. Small-sized drones can operate in houses, and they can search for unauthorized users. 

Or they can search for thermal leaks and possible fire. There is a possibility that the insect-shaped drone looks like a brooch. And then that brooch is simply left on the table. That tool can operate under its controller's command and make records from the space. The small robot insect can also use stun or lethal injections to target people. And when we talk about things like flapping-wing robots, there can be many types and many forms of those systems. 

The robot can look like a caramel box, and it can find any target in that building using artificial intelligence. Those systems are more dangerous than we can even imagine. They can play garbage and destroy the privacy at any point in the world. 

And that gives them the ultimate ability to perform different types of operations in certain areas. The problem with the small-sized drones is their limited operational range. The answer to that problem can be the drone, which has wing geometry and wing adjustments that mimic albatrosses. 

That bird is known for its ultimate ability to fly for even years without the need to land. And that ability is possible to transfer to a flapping-wing drone. Artificial feathers can adjust air flows in similar ways to how feathers work for real birds. The wing and surface act like real albatross feathers and wing geometry. The flapping-wing drone can have many types of missions. The wing geometry and body shape can mimic other birds like hawks. 

That thing gives those drones quite a fast top speed. When we think about the flapping-wing drones, those systems can also use things like fuel cells and special solar panels as a power source. In albatross-shaped drones, the system can load its batteries from airflow, and that increases its flight time. 

Those solar panels can mimic feathers. Or those drones can drink some hydrocarbon like alcohol to give fuel for their fuel cells. That system allows them to operate anywhere, anytime. But things like radioisotope batteries can give those systems virtually unlimited operational time and range. But if that system is in the wrong hands, it causes security problems, because those nuclear batteries involve dangerous radioactive material. 

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/08/falcon-like-drone-lands-softly-on-your-palm-japan-team-says-this-is-the-future-of-flight/

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/08/albatrosss-dynamic-soaring-flight-style-holds-the-secret-to-extending-drone-flight-times-with-wind-energy/

AI and cartels.

     AI and cartels. 

Increasingly, more actions are being outsourced to AI. The stock market is a vast arena where individuals can utilize more or less sophisticated algorithms. The algorithm can see things. Like, changes in courses, like raising the value faster than a human. Then the AI-trainer must have the point where to sell and where to buy. The system must follow the small losses of the values and then decide to buy or sell. 

The AI must buy cheap shares and sell them when their value is high enough. The AI can follow more targets than a human. And it can see how the share values advance. If those shares are losing their value fast. And a person doesn't watch that curve, which causes losses. The AI will never get boring. And it ever sleeps. The case of the investor finds something else interesting: the screen on the table can cost millions in seconds. 

The AI can be a tool that solves those problems. But algorithms can exchange information illegally. The cartel means a situation in which a person uses an inner circle or non-public information to make profits from the stock market. 

And one version of cartels is a case. When traders make a contract to drive investments to certain targets. When somebody buys shares. That raises their values. So the group just dumps money into some target. The AI can also accidentally ask for advice from another AI. 

There can be a leading algorithm. That leader algorithm makes investments, and then other algorithms follow that thing. The fact is that,  even if some algorithms or AI chatbots look different, they can operate on the same platform. The AI chatbots can be the same, even if they seem different. And that thing means the AI can start to drive investments to certain objects. One AI-based solution can operate millions of investors' investments. 

This kind of AI can theoretically aim for even billions of dollars to the same target. And that thing makes it possible to raise the value of the shares. The AI is the tool that can react faster than humans. Criminals can create the AI-based investment cartels using quite simple algorithms. The AI that can control millions of objects in the bors can guarantee that a person cannot lose money in that game. The AI can invest small sums of money in a large group of targets. The system can buy and sell shares far faster than a human. So the person will always get profits. 

https://fortune.com/2025/08/01/artificial-stupidity-ai-trading-stock-market-behaviors-price-fixing-collusion-wharton-study/

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/artificial-stupidity-made-ai-trading-110500308.html

Can we trust AI?

    Can we trust AI? 

Artificial intelligence is a tool that doesn't create information from emptiness. That means the AI uses data and information that already exists. If something or somebody changes information from the data sources that the AI uses, the AI gives wrong answers. The AI can use old-fashioned information. In the same way, a human can take an old book of facts from the shelf. 

That is one thing that we must remember. The second thing is that most AI chatbots are owned by companies whose purpose is to bring profits for their owners. That causes a situation where some of the answers that the AI gives are customer-friendly. That means they are made to please customers, or people who pay for those chatbot services. 

However, one of the most important aspects of using AI is that it is actually utilized incorrectly. But the question is, why is it used? Because it makes work more effective. That means people who work with the AI assistants have no time to think and check the answers that the AI gives. The prime focus in AI use is that it makes people do more work. 

The modern business ecosystem has evolved over time, when all products were physical. That means the business ecosystem measures the effectiveness of the worker by simply calculating the number of work performances in a time unit. And that means the number of code lines that a programmer makes determines how effective that person is. And that means there is no time to analyze and think about the product that the AI makes. 

This is the problem with AI. It makes people more effective, and it should leave time to make analyses about the product. But the problem is that if the AI allows the person to work at double speed, that gives the company leaders the opportunity to fire half the workers. That decreases costs. 

When we talk about how AI makes things less effectively than a top-level programmer, we can find one very interesting question. If we analyze that argument closely, we face the claim that all programmers are top-level specialists. All programmers are top-level specialists. And another thing is that some workplaces are so hurried that they have no time to advise junior programmers. Sometimes old workers think that the young comrade is a competitor, and that makes the workplace atmosphere poisonous. 

The person might not dare to ask for advice from workmates. And that causes firing. The thing is that the AI is a tool that can help people. But we must remember that this tool allows us to analyze and think about new possibilities, only if we give it that chance. But we must have time and willingness to check the data that the AI gives. And if we see the AI only as a tool that allows us to cut the personnel costs, that is not the way to make our working life easier. 

If we just copy-paste texts that the AI makes. And don't even try to analyze that data, we don't increase trustworthiness in the company. That means we deliver the decisions to the AI. AI can also use old-fashioned datasets. Or it can use fake or falsified data. That means the AI makes mistakes in the same way as humans. It simply takes the wrong book from the shelf, and then that causes destruction or catastrophe. 

The AI is not immune to fake information. The problem with propaganda home pages is that their page rank are raised by drumming it with net queries. That makes those homepages easier to find. The problem with those pages is this: they use .com or some other neutral terminal identifiers. So, those homepages are not easy to connect to China or Russia. They are operated from servers that are in Western countries. The operators use a remote control to control those servers that operate in Western sockets. 

If the AI uses regular web browsing applications, that means it can select a propaganda page. The popular pages are always at the top of the page lists. And that thing means that the AI selects popular homepages. That decreases the AI's trustworthiness. The AI requires training. That training means that the users must set limits on what kind of sources those systems use. 

How the world learned to love the bomb?

   How the world learned to love the bomb? 

Mushroom cloud of the world's first full-scale thermonuclear bomb Ivy Mike (10,4 megaton of TNT) in the Enewetak atoll, Marshall Islands, November 1, 1952.

Weapons of mass destruction offer respect in the global theater. Every nation or leader that owns nuclear weapons has noticed that those weapons make them more tolerant than ever before. And that calls the other nations and leaders to the nuclear club. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty denies the delivery of nuclear weapon technology to other nations. 

Some countries are not even planning to follow any contracts. That they made. And because countries like North Korea acquire nuclear weapons, it causes the effect that other countries are willingly joining the nuclear club. Nations like Japan are planning to get their national nuclear weapons for their safety. The nuclear dome protects countries, and that's why Israel, Iran, and many other countries have or plan to create nuclear weapons. 

The Russian nuclear plant projects in Africa can mean that African countries are also interested in nuclear armament. South Africa has made its test explosion. And after the Apartheid government, those weapons were dismantled. But there is a possibility that South Africa planned to restore its nuclear arsenal. In the same way, India and Pakistan joined the Nuclear club. And the Malian military leaders made contact with Russian nuclear cooperation. So, that raises a question: Does Mali want to join the nuclear club? 

On the 9th of August 1945, a B-29 dropped a second atomic bomb on Nagasaki. Nagasaki was the second and last time that somebody used a nuclear weapon in war. Targets were civilians, but there were steelworks and a naval base in that city. The nuclear bomb was one of the weapons that were planned to make the military stockpile stronger. And in 1945. World War II was going on. The air raids were brutal, and many cities were erased by using firebombs and massive area bombardment. 

So, when U.S. officials ordered the use of nuclear weapons, they, or most of them. Thought that the weapon was the "super napalm bomb". There have been many discussions about the use of those weapons. Was that raid legal, or was it necessary? In that time, the mass bombardments on cities, including civilian targets, were rather usual than an exception. 

And in that time, attitudes were different than today.  Today, we know about cancer, suffering, and other things that radiation and nuclear weapons cause. The Soviet Union made many nuclear tests after 1949. And there can be nuclear victims who are never mentioned. If the Soviets made human tests, those tests were made using GULAG prisoners. 

Nuclear weapons are not only weapons of mass destruction. The most common WMDs are chemical and biological weapons. But the problem is that those weapons are prohibited. The second problem is that their way to affect enemies is worse than anyone ever thought. Biological weapons like weaponized organisms can kill more people than nuclear weapons. But the problem is that those horrifying weapons can cause global epidemics. 

Those silent killers are less dramatic and even scarier than nuclear weapons. There is also a possibility of using organisms as tools that can destroy enemy fuel storage. Or they can deliver deadly organisms like the Ebola virus to the air ventilation. The same microbes that destroy leaked oil can also destroy diesel storage. 

Sometimes people say that nuclear weapons play such a big role in global strategies, because nobody can hide their use. 

There is a possibility. Those enemy agents will slip into the oil storage. And put those microbes into the oil tanks. 

The nuclear, or radiation, weapons are not always nuclear bombs. And the idea of the use of radioactive materials like radium as a weapon was introduced by the French Headquarters during World War 1. The idea was to make the chemical strikes more effective. The problem was that more advanced gas protection systems made chemical weapons ineffective. And the answer was radium bombs. 

Even today, radium that is put around the dynamite is one of the most brutal and feared weapons in the world. Those "Dirty weapons" are of interest to terrorists. The term "dirty nuclear weapon" means a nuclear weapon that is used for terrorist purposes. And one of the biggest risks is the nuclear weapon that has no safety mechanisms. If a primitive nuke will go to the wrong hands. The results can be devastating. 

The Nagasaki bomb, "Fat Man," used a plutonium implosion mechanism. The explosives press the ball-shaped plutonium, bite and crunch it. The implosion mechanism is also possible for the uranium bombs. But in modern nuclear weapons, the fission stage uses plutonium. A plutonium bomb requires nuclear reactors. And that makes those weapons easier to control. 

Shutting down those reactors is enough to stop plutonium production. Another thing is that plutonium is more radioactive, and that brings safety against thieves. But otherwise, all nuclear reactors produce plutonium. And that plutonium is easy to separate. Using centrifugal separation. The centrifugal systems can also separate uranium, U-235, from uranium alloy. The idea is that centrifugal systems collect the heaviest particles at the bottom of the chamber. 

Natural uranium includes a very small part of fissile U-235. Most of natural uranium is U-238. The nuclear reactor bombs use uranium-238 with neutrons. And that turns the uranium-238 into plutonium-239. The uranium line problem is that the first step is that the bomb makers must separate lighter U-235 from heavier U-238. 

But why did nuclear weapons rise to an important position after World War 2? The answer is that the nature of nuclear weapons makes it more acceptable than biological or chemical weapons. Biological and chemical weapons kill people, but they leave structures and merchandise untouched. Those kinds of weapons are brutal in the eyes of people. The neutron warhead, which is an extremely small hydrogen bomb with an energy of less than 0,5 kiloton, is mentioned as one of the most inhumane weapons in history. 

The reason for that is the neutron radiation that kills all living organisms but leaves vehicles and other things without damage. The neutron warhead or enhanced radiation weapon was planned to be used in surgical strikes, and one of its purposes was to detonate enemy nuclear weapons before they reached targets. And neutron warheads are also planned to be used as a primary stage to launch hydrogen bombs. That neutron weapon is one of the most criticized weapon types in the nuclear stockpile. 

The nuclear weapon destroys structures like tanks, ships, and bunkers. That's why it's easier to justify than some biological and chemical weapons. Things like bunker buster bombs look nicer than some human-killing systems that kill people but leave stuff without damage. The dramatic effect of nuclear weapons is the thing that makes them horrifying and, in the same way, effective-looking weapons. 

Those weapons are making their owners more tolerant than any other weapons. When nations justify their military actions against other nations, it is because they have nuclear weapons. That causes a domino effect, and there are more and more leaders who want nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons are tools that some leaders can use to justify their power. After World War 2, there were more and more countries and leaders who wanted a nuclear shield around them. 

And the new question is always: who decides who owns nuclear weapons? If nuclear weapon exists, there is always a possibility that somebody will use them. That is one of the reasons why all conflicts always turn so dangerous. Some people willingly pay for those kinds of things. And even primitive nuclear weapons are things that can destroy entire cities. The problem with primitive nuclear weapons like cannon devices that are a copy of Hiroshima bombs is that they are tools that terrorists can use. 

Another thing is that the primitive nuclear weapon, without any safety systems, makes it possible for terrorists to use that weapon in their strikes. In poor countries, there is a possibility that people who work in nuclear weapon programs sell those weapons to some "businessmen". In the wrong hands, all nuclear weapons are dangerous. But the most dangerous things are the nuclear weapons that have no safety systems. The nuclear weapons offer respect in global fields. And that means those weapons are completely out of control. 

https://www.nuclearweaponarchive.org/

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/mali-junta-russian-state-nuclear-firm-sign-cooperation-deals-2024-07-10/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivy_Mike