Proving the multiverse theory is difficult or even impossible.

Image 1:)

How many universes exist? The fact is that there is only one confirmed universe in space. The scattering of light in our universe covers the possibility to see other universes. And the light pollution from galaxies and stars is covering those universes under that light.

So we cannot confirm the existence of those other universes by using straight observations. So maybe the gravitational effect of the other universes could uncover them. In that method, the changes in the form of the visible universe would uncover those other universes. But the fact is that we don't know how much dark matter is outside the visible universe?

And we don't know are the particles in other, still hypothetical universes have the same fermions and bosons, etc., that they are in our universe. There is the possibility that the other universes are dark to us.

Or maybe they have not existed. But the fact is that proving the existence or denying it is impossible in this kind of question. So are these kinds of theories scientific? Yes and no. Those theories are so-called philosophical- half-scientific theories. Logically thinking there should be another universe.

*********************************************************************

Fractal universe theory

image 2:)

Have you ever heard so-called "fractal theory"? The idea of the fractal theory is that universe is like a fractal. In fractals, the same form repeats again and again, on a larger scale. In that theory, the material acts in the material universe in the same way as fractals. So that means the universe could be part of the disk-shaped hyper structure called the local group of universes.

And if we continue the fractal theory or fractal universe theory far enough the universe would be part of the groups and supergroups of universes. In that theory, the same form continues forever but on a larger scale. In the fractal theory, the universes are forming similar forms to stars in galaxies and galaxies are forming in the universe. So why universes cannot form similar structures?

*********************************************************************

We can think of the universe as one galactic hyper-group.

First came galaxies, then galaxy groups, and then galactic supergroups. So why universes cannot form similar structures.

If we are following a cosmological timeline, we first saw galaxies, then we realize that the Milky Way is only one galaxy that was a member of the galaxy group. Then cosmologists understood that galaxy groups were part of supergroups.

And supergroups are part of a larger entirety. Finally, we see that all visible galaxies are part of the entirety called the universe. So the next logical step is that similar structures repeat on a larger scale. That means the universe is part of the group of universes and that group of universes is part of a supergroup of the universe. So is the universe part of the structure called hyper-universe?

But like in infinity theories proving those theories is difficult or even impossible. Proving that something is infinite requires infinite time. So we can handle only things involved in a limited time. The timeline can be long and take billions of years. But anyway timeline in those cases is finite.

Proving this kind of theory true or false is not possible. The cosmic background, so-called three-kelvin radiation that is forming when the universe expands along with dark energy are things that could help to prove that some particles are not visible. Dark energy is wave motion that rips the universe into pieces.

Because the wave motion cannot form from emptiness there must be some kind of source for that energy. And one explanation is that the source of dark energy is outside our universe. Or, excuse me, outside our visible universe. Most of our universe is invisible to us.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

Image 1:) https://jimmyakin.com/2019/01/what-the-in-the-world-is-the-multiverse.html

Image 2:) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology. The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use. When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe. Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave. We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects. If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center. The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,

Cogito ergo sum. I think; therefore I am (René Descartes, French philosopher)

Search This Blog