Facebook and dominance of the media.

The position of Facebook is dominating and that causes concern. Facebook is a well-known and commonly used service. And that thing causes that the information is starting to pile up in that service. That information contains data that we might want to hide. Facebook is a network-based service that can use for many purposes from marketing to intelligence. 

Facebook was down and the thing cost about half a million dollars per hour to that service. That shutdown has shown how dominating that service has been growing. Facebook is a powerful tool. It can use to track the networks of people. 

Artificial intelligence can show the network map of the people who are using that service. The data that travels between certain members of the network can show how often those people are contacting each other. There is a lot of criticism against Facebook but the fact is that everybody is using that thing. 

The attitudes toward Facebook are conflicting. People are criticizing that service because it dangers privacy. And otherways almost everybody is using it. The governmental and private corporations and actors are found that service. But the critics for it is caused because the users are making its content. So they are offering their work for Facebook. But otherwise, the paper magazines and especially the car and other hobby magazines are used the same method for making their content. 

The reporter came to take a couple of photographs of the hobby car made short writing and then return home. The builder of the vehicle didn't get anything. And the magazine was sold to people at a very good price. That is the thing that ever caused criticism. But the social media services are caused discussions of copyrights. There have been discussions of copyright, freedom of speech, and other things like that. 

The question is about the line of social media and its moderation. Who is making the limits for cheating and other things? Maybe we would not face those problems without social media. What is tolerated? And what is not tolerated? The thing is that in social media are many things that are causing discussions and what are a little bit uncomfortable for some people. But there is one thing that we must realize and that is would the world even know about things that Putin has made in his country without social media? 

When people are saying they must not read negative things. Because they want to keep fun they are allowed to do that thing. When people are writing to social media they are allowed to make those things by using the platform that they want to use. 

Maybe many of those writings are boring, but who cares. People have the right to celebrate. But otherwise thinking also boring people has right to write something. Nobody listens to boring people and maybe that is the reason why they must write something. If those things are boring people must not read them. 

Who forces us to spend time reading things like this? If you have read this text to this point that is your choice. You could spend your time by making something other things. So if you hate this text, I must say that choice was yours. I didn't force you to read. There are lots of people who are not social, they are not spending their time in a disco all day. 

They look boring so they can disturb somebody. That's why they are at home. But if you are in the disco and some other person would write something boring would you spend all the time while reading the texts what boring people are writing? Why you are not at dancing? Or maybe that thing is not my business. 

Image: Pinterest

https://networkedinternet.blogspot.com/

Have you been in this situation, where all choices would be wrong?

Picture I

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/have-you-been-in-this-situation-where.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Have you ever been in the situation, that your boss would give you the offer, that something, what has been done would be let be, and if you would be silent, you would keep your job? Probably that would seem like the wise choice, but your situation is very bad because your boss would probably kick you off anyway, and the secrecy contract would only protect that person.


The reason for making the bad contracts is that the boss or other offenders would offer something, what is not out of question in that situation. But how can we recognize the form, what makes bad contracts with the workers? The first alarm that the culture in the firm is very bad is that the interviewer asks, what are your family relationships. Those things have nothing to do with the working, and sometimes that question is actually for collecting the information, what can be guessed from the spouses.


That thing might seem very interesting, but sometimes those companies want to ask about the mental situation about those workers. And that information would be used to taking the property from that person. The information is actually the property and in sometimes the persons, who are fishing the information uses the mental disorders to get the passwords to that targeted person's personal files like diaries, and the excuse for that might be, that this person would write too much.


And there is the risk about suicide. When we are thinking about that kind of reasons and chances for getting the information about bank accounts and other confidential things, the information would be meant for the honeypot. The term means the information, what seems like very intelligent and qualified, but the files are pure grab.


When we are looking at the Internet, we might notice, that there are been many writings about Chinese hackers, who would be got the information about top secret files of the United States military forces. Those files could be also hoaxed, what has the purpose to uncover the officers or other personnel, who leaks those informative files to the net.


The same methodology would be used in the other organizations. There is always data, what can help to locate the leaker in the seconds. And some of those files consisted the data, what is also faked. If somebody steals the drawings of the warship from the server of the military forces, that would mean that those vessels are totally unsuitable in the military usage, or they can be dangerous for the users.


Some of the stolen papers would involve the viruses, and those data viruses can sometimes collect themselves together for very complicated software, what can steal information from the network, and in the real war situation that software can destroy entire network from the information when the user of that virus would send the activation code. The idea of that STEALTH-virus is the same as T-1000 from the "Terminator movie".


Those small bits of code can form very large and complicated software when they are connecting together. In this case, the program bits is the control code, what helps them to find the right place in the structure.  And in the wildest dreams that computer virus, what bases the artificial intelligence can take the control of the strategic nuclear missiles, and shoot them to own cities.

Picture I

https://news-cdn.softpedia.com/images/news2/Important-Scottish-Newspaper-Leaks-Private-Data-2.jpg

The message of the Hugo Simberg painting “At the Crossroads”

"At the crossroads"
Hugo Simberg
(1894)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The symbolism of the art is the very deep thing. When the portrait is looked the first time many people see only the picture of something. But when we are thinking about the portrait, there might be the very deep story to tell for the watcher. Above the text is Hugo Simberg painting, where angel and devil are walking together with the man.


First, we will see the very funny situation, but then there would be a serious message for the observer. Hugo Simberg wanted to tell us, that when the man learns some skills, this person makes always own choices between good and bad. The devil is on the right side, and it pulls the man to walk together with this character.


Angel in at the left side of the person. The symbol of this character is that the choices must be made by using the heart. This is sometimes difficult, and when we are looking at this portrait, we must say, that the choice to follow the devil seems sometimes be right. And following the devil always looks like very easy.


Evil always promises something nice looking thing, what symbolizes those ships at the strait. The canvas of those ships is red, what symbolizes hate and violence. This thing means that devil promises the revenge for that man. Angel promises nothing. But when we are thinking about those promises, the devil will set this man to the position, where this person must thank this devil. So devil hangs this person in his character, and addicts this man about the gifts what this bad character gives to this man in this painting.


When people are walking with the angel, they will walk straight ahead. But then there would be no choice than choose of two roads what are offered. This person has come to “T” crossing, where he must make the choice, what road would he choose. And they would understand the consequences of the decisions, what this person makes. Following the devil seems very easy, but it would not take the life anywhere. The initial setting of the portrait is quite a mark of Stoic philosophy, where people should be very cold and objective.

And the devil at the right side of the man symbolizes also the inducements of the life. There are many things, how the person can destroy the own and other people life. And those things like drugs, illegal activities and bad company should be avoided. This is the thing what Simberg wants to tell the people in this portrait.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-message-of-hugo-simberg-painting-at.html