Showing posts with label Theory of relativity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Theory of relativity. Show all posts

Monday, September 15, 2025

Does spacetime (or, space-time) exist?

 Does spacetime (or, space-time) exist? 



"Exploring different approaches to understanding space-time deepens our understanding of reality. Credit: Shutterstock" (ScitechDaily, Does Space-Time Really Exist?)

"Is time something that flows — or just an illusion? Exploring space-time as either a fixed “block universe” or a dynamic fabric reveals deeper mysteries about existence, change, and the very nature of reality."(ScitechDaily, Does Space-Time Really Exist?)

Does spacetime exist? Does the space have time? We know the thing. Called material time. That time is seen in material evaporation. Because of the expansion of the universe. That thing causes an effect that all material turns into a wave movement. 

In the five-dimensional cosmological model, there are three spatial dimensions. And two dimensions in time.  Those two dimensions are time that goes forward and time that travels backward. In that model, time is one of the fundamental interactions. The idea in the spacetime model is that the Big Bang released material in time. Or it separated time and material. In this case. We talk about material evaporation. The model goes like this. The universe formed from a so-called Kugelblitz black hole. When the whirl started to collect energy in the proto-universe, it formed the black hole. Straight from that energy field that condensed into the black hole. When that black hole evaporated or detonated. That formed an event called the Big Bang. 

That means there is space formed between superstrings that will form the first particles. In that model, the superstring is an extremely thin energy field that turns into fermions and bosons. Superstrings are not single things. They are complicated internal structures. And in black holes, those superstrings are in such a tight form that they have no space to oscillate. That space caused an effect that those superstrings started to send sub-waves. When a superstring oscillates, it sends part of itself into its environment. This event would be similar to the material evaporation. 

When there is no energy that can resist the superstring, it sends the sub-string. In the same way as material, the existence, thickness, or number of structures in a superstring depends on the field that resists the superstring. The ten-dimensional superstring model explains the universe and space as an endless number of superstrings. The density or number of those superstrings in the space determines the strength of the field. When there are lots of strings in a small area, that means the field is strong. 

The main question in time dilation is this: Does that effect only push energy into particles? Or, does that affect cause a situation where the particle travels in time? 



Above: The 2D model of the gravity center. The gravity center packs energy fields around it. That forms a denser energy area. The gravity makes a pothole, but it also packs energy fields around the gravitational center. 

This denser, or higher energy area causes the effect that energy transfer to the environment slows down. And that slows material evaporation. If the difference between energy levels in the material and the environment is high. The energy level around the particle is very low. That raises the speed of energy flow out from the particle. The same effect can cause superstrings to decay just as matter. 

And that means the superstring model tells us that the spacetime should exist. When a gravity field forms, the gravity center rolls the field of those superstrings to the gravitational center. That effect is seen as a whirl in the universe. Those whirls can be extremely large. And all spiral galaxies are whirls that form around the supermassive black holes. Those whirls pull back, and without them, the black hole in the center of the galaxy will be detonated. 

And then we go to the spacetime. The idea in spacetime is this: energy fields or wave movement are everywhere. Those energy fields can condense into material. Because of the Schwinger effect. The Schwinger effect forms elementary particles, fermions. And bosons. In a similar way. The Schwinger effect explains the Kugelblitz black hole as a structure. Where the whirl will collect the energy fields or strings into one point. When there is enough field. Packed into one point. It creates a strong gravity effect that pulls everything into it. Without that whirl, the energy that is stored in a black hole is released. The whirl is the thing. That keeps the black hole in its form. 

We can think that when time moves from the past to the future, that thing looks a little bit like a superstring. When those time strings or “arrows of time”, or “time arrows” (Time’s arrow)move, they push time back around them. So when the arrow of time moves forward, that moves other arrows backward. If one of the arrows of time moves faster than the other arrow of time. That faster time arrow slows the slower arrows of time. The reason for that is that the time arrow moves energy into those other arrows of time. 

The arrow of time, along with Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, explains that when gravity turns so strong that the escape velocity turns higher than the speed of light. That means time starts to travel backward. The black holes will pump energy into the past if that model is right. And that energy is released at the point where a black hole forms. But the question is, does that thing really happen? Or does the black hole only store information and release it when it evaporates? This is the thing. That makes supernovae interesting. 

Theoretically, it is possible to decode the information that the black hole released. And there is a possibility. A black hole drives information straight into the point where. The black hole formed, and that point is the supernova explosion. Where the black hole got its beginning. 


https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/argument-against-theory-of-everything/


https://scitechdaily.com/does-space-time-really-exist/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kugelblitz_(astrophysics)


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_relativity



Monday, March 28, 2022

Should we choose the Theory of Special Relativity or the Theory of General Relativity?



The fact is that which formula we should use depends on the gravitational field. The gravitational field causes the curvature of spacetime. But when we should choose the Theory of General Relativity or Theory of Special Relativity? The curvature of the spacetime must be strong enough that the Theory of General Relativity can give the right answers. 

Some people say that the Theory of Special Relativity and the Theory of General Relativity should be renamed oppositely. The Theory of General Relativity handles particles' behavior in strong gravitational fields or curving spacetime. The Theory of Special Relativity handles the behavior of particles in a weak gravitational field or straight spacetime. 

The idea of curvature of spacetime means that every single material particle is in a gravitational pothole. And the curvature of spacetime is like the edge of the pothole. 


The theory of Relativity is two theories.


1) Theory of Special Relativity is a suitable tool for calculating speed in straight spacetime. 


2)Theory of General Relativity gives the right answers when the particle is in the strong gravitational field. 


In straight spacetime, the Theory of Special Relativity is a useful tool. So in a weak gravitational field, the Theory of Special Relativity is still an effective tool. But when the pothole that gravitation makes is deep enough the Theory of General Relativity turns to get the effect in calculations. 

Some people say that we need a new gravitational theory. But for that theory should be some kind of evidence. And the remarkable thing is that those two theories that were made in 1905 and 1916 are still unbreakable. Maybe quantum computers and new telescopes are finding errors in those brilliant masterpieces. 


See also:

Theory of General Relativity


Theory of Special Relativity



A couple of writings of black holes


An interesting idea of the formula E=mc^2


When we are thinking about the formula E=mc^2


E=Energy


m=Mass


c=the speed of light


Does that formula note the situation where an object itself moves to a speed that is near the speed of light and there will impact more energy? In the case, where the object orbits a black hole just at the point of the event horizon, its speed can increase the speed of light. 

And then there is coming energy impulse from the side of the object. That thing causes the energy level will rise to the level. That is higher than the object gets at the speed of light. That energy impact is called the virtual cross of the speed of light. In real life that impact will push objects inside the black hole. 

In the cases that the escaping velocity is higher than the speed of light, the speed of photons and other particles is the same. When the particles are inside the event horizon. They are all traveling at the same speed. And if we think that the speed is also the relative thing. That depends on the difference in the speed of the objects. So if the speed of photons and other objects is the same the difference between their speed is zero. 

So relatively saying the behind the event horizon speed of a photon is zero if we compare it with the speed of other objects. In black holes is not speed like we think that thing. And behind the event horizon or the point where escaping velocity turns higher than the speed of light. All objects and wave movements travel in the same way with the same speed. 

What if we would drop in the black hole? The thing that makes black holes different than other places in the universe is that all movement travels to the direction of the center of the black hole. 

So in the black hole, all particles are traveling in the same direction with the same speed. That means there is no mutual speed between them. That kind of situation is impossible in our universe. There is always radiation that comes to us or that comes sideways.

But if we want to think about the situation that all particles are traveling at the same speed in the same direction we would not see the person who is in front of us. Or we cannot see either the person who is behind us. All objects in that strange world would be alone. 

Because photons and wave movement are sent from them are surrounding those objects. Because everything travels at the same speed even photons cannot reach an object. That is behind or ahead of the object then sends radiation. 

If an object is diagonally angled to the movement direction of the observer. There is the possibility that the observer can see the photons that are seen sideways or horizontally against the trajectory.

 Or if we know that there is some object at the side of us can touch that object. But we cannot see that object because the photon cannot reach us. We could see the flash from the object that is diagonally ahead of us. The reason for that is that the photon that moves sideways or follows the track that is the cone can impact us. 

If we are thinking the case that the particle is traveling with the speed of a photon. And we want to compile the speed of light with the speed of the object that travels with the same speed with photons the difference between the speed of photons and other particles is zero. 

And that means if the object travels with the speed of photons. There is no interaction between the object and photons. The photons and wave movement cannot reach the object and the wave movement can escape from the object only sideway to its track. 

Or the gravitational field of the object can pull the particles and wave movement to its core by curving the wave movement that travels on the side of the object.  This is the key element when we try to analyze what happens in the strange world inside the black hole. 


https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

Saturday, October 9, 2021

What is the problem with the Theory of General Relativity?



Is Einstein's Theory of General Relativity right or wrong? We have proven that Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity is right. But why somebody is suspicious in the case of the Theory of General Relativity? The Theory of General Relativity is made for fixing errors in the Theory of Special Relativity that doesn't mention the behavior of the objects in the curving spacetime. Those errors were noticed when observations of the trajectory of the planet Mercury have not to match with theoretical calculations. 

Albert Einstein introduced his Theory of Special Relativity in 1905. And the Theory of General Relativity was introduced in 1916 during WWI. The First World War was the worst moment to publish scientific papers. And after the war, the winners were jealous of those kinds of things. So we must remember that Einstein made his work in Germany. And the war covered that work that is called the most beautiful formula in the world E=Mc^2:


E=Mc^2 is

E=Energy

M= Mass

c= Speed of light


This was the short history of those very interesting theories that are the cornerstone of the modern way to think about the cosmos. 

But the thing that makes the Theory of General Relativity so interesting is that is not working with quantum mechanics or quantum physics. The quantum theory is compatible with the Theory of Special Relativity but not with the Theory of General Relativity. And that causes thoughts is there the missing piece between the quantum theory and the Theory of General Relativity. 

The problem with both theories of relativity and quantum theory is that they are meant for different scales. The theory of Special Relativity is handling the cases of the straight universe. And Theory of General Relativity handles the things that happen in the curving spacetime. So what makes those theories problematic? Maybe we are thinking the wrong way. Maybe there is an error that Einstein didn't notice. The thing is that we always try to make the models. 

Or is that error on the side of quantum theory. Does that theory notice the oscillation and vibration of the quantum particles? And if we are thinking that the quantum particles are not ever stable we might think that the quantum theory just doesn't notice that the place of the particles is changing all the time. And do those theories notice the wave-particle duality? 

That means the particles in the universe are not smooth. They are wrinkled or full of the protuberance. But when we are thinking about curving spacetime we must ask is there a limit for curving that is necessary when the Theory of General Relativity can connect with quantum theory. Or is there something missing between quantum theory and the Theory of General relativity? 

And in that case, we are using the most extreme cases in the universe. The fact is that spacetime is curving around all gravitational objects. But is it curving enough that the Theory of General Relativity can work with those reactions? If we are thinking that the gravitation causes the pothole in the spacetime, how deep that pothole should be that the Theory of General Relativity is turning dominant? 

Black holes are the most extreme objects in the universe. Even the light cannot escape from those gravitation centers. So is it possible that the gravitation of any other object in the universe is so weak, that the pothole around the object is not deep enough that the Theory of General Relativity is not fitting in the case? 


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_field_theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics


https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

Atoms and diamonds.

“Artistic depiction of circular Rydberg atoms: Using optical tweezers (shown in green), the Rydberg atoms can be precisely trapped and arran...