 |
| F-36 Interceptor (Picture I) |
http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/making-analyze-of-technical-advantages.html
Kimmo Huosionmaa
Next writing is pure hypothetical, and there is full of presumptions. When we are talking about information, what is given about military equipment, we must think also many more things that only the written details. Many times there are more important things, in the parts, what is not purely. The thing what should notice, when somebody writes or tells about AREA-51 or some equipment, what is classified as "Top Secret", is that who would use it, or where it should fly.
This might feels boring, but if some military aircraft home base is AREA-51, and it would fly every mission from that base, would that mean something. When we are talking about military aircraft or any other weapons, we must notice that those equipment need support bases and support equipment. And if we are thinking about the top aircraft in the world like SR-71 "Blackbird" we might guess, why those flights were so expensive to fly.
Same reason might cause the reason, why also B-2 "Spirit" bombers are so expensive. Those aircraft are unique pieces, and that's why they need many unique parts, and probably even the chemical mixture of those aircraft fuels is unique. That makes them very expensive. Also if there would be problems in the mission, those aircraft need support crew, what would handle those planes in the case of accidents. But when we are talking about top military equipment, we must know, that there must be systems, what can abort the mission, if that plane or it's pilot would starting to act unexpected way.
And one of the questions is that if some naval aircraft have the capacity to use hydrogen as a fuel, that gives the unlimited capacity to operate those planes from aircraft carriers. Nuclear powered aircraft carriers have the capacity to make hydrogen by using electrolysis in the chamber, and if there would be aircraft, what have the capacity to use hydrogen in its jet motors, that aircraft would not have limits for its operations. That means the task force doesn't need oil supply for aircraft. and that would also make those aircraft carriers safer because they can make the fuel only when they need it.
The hydrogen what is produced by electrolysis would not end like hydrocarbons, and if we want to be clever, we might equip those aircraft also with oxygen tanks, what means that they would rise very high altitude. If those jet-fighters would use oxygenation in their jet motors, they can rise to the orbital trajectory.
If we are thinking about the controlling those aircraft, they might equip with control layers, what is installed in the jettison. Those layers would turn the exhaust gas and allows those aircraft to maneuver outside from atmosphere. This could be the future military aircraft, what can operate in and out of the atmosphere, and that thing has also capacity to destroy satellites by using missiles or laser weapons. Those aircraft or space shuttles can also use EMP-weapons to destroy the satellites electronic equipment when the satellite would look like undamaged, but it's electronics are destroyed.
That would be the catastrophic situation if that happens to "sleeping" satellite, what is sent to space for use in wartime. The EMP makes the situation possible, where those satellites don't wake up, or in the worst scenario somebody might replace the electronic equipment of the satellite by another one using spacewalk, and then that satellite might send the opponent's headquarters position to the weapons. In the worst scenario opponents, the military commander would shoot missiles in their own headquarters. But this is only the hypothetical situation and there is no proof that this kind of things has been done.
Sources:
Picture I
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/61/F-35A_flight_%28cropped%29.jpg/1200px-F-35A_flight_%28cropped%29.jpg
http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/making-analyze-of-technical-advantages.html
