Organic molecules on Mars' surface are causing a question was there some ancient lifeforms?

Image 0) Mars as we see it today.

Image 1) Mars' climate change. "Researchers in the University of Arizona Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology simulated the conditions hypothetical lifeforms would have encountered on Mars 4 billion years ago when liquid water was likely present in abundance on the red planet. Credit: ESO/M. Kornmess" (ScitechDaily.com/Ancient Mars May Have Been Teeming With Life, Until It Drove Climate Change That Caused Its Demise)

The modern theory about life on Mars goes like this: there were ancient life forms. But some of the kinds of meteorite impacts destroyed that primitive life.  Those meteor impacts melted the Red Plant's lithosphere at least twice. And they also transfer the trajectory of that planet. During those impacts, the red planet lost its atmosphere. 

But the problem with those primitive life forms is: are they endemically formed on Mars, or did they come from somewhere else? The lifeforms might not active anymore, but there is the possibility the researchers can isolate the RNA or DNA of those primitive bacteria. If those genomes are isolated. The genome sequences of that fossil bacteria can decode those sequences that can compile with bacteria that are found on Earth. 

And then those sequences can tell were those bacteria anaerobic or aerobic. Also, if there are similar sequences that make bacteria strings. That thing tells if those bacteria swam in some kind of liquid. But when we must realize one thing. Before mitochondria formed. The first protobacteria used volcanic temperature as an energy source. 

But there are many uncertain things about life on Mars. If those lifeforms are only in a couple of positions on the red planet. That tells those bacteria came from somewhere else. And solving that thing scientists must make a careful and comprehensive research about the origin of those lifeforms. 

By the way... 

Image 2)

Image 3)

Do you remember "cities on Mars" and "the Face"? The first thing is a series of triangular forms. The face is proven the result of some kind of shadow. The last thing uncovered a pastille-looking form. Or maybe the original face was some kind of sand structure that has vanished. Image 2 is the Viking image from the red planet. And image 3 is the new image from the same place. 

Image 4 is the "city of Cydonia". 

Those things are still interesting. And those things mean that we must continue also searching for remnants of intelligent lifeforms. And one of the most exciting visions is the possibility to find an abandoned base from somewhere in our solar system. The fact is that those strange-looking geological formations are formed after Mars lost its core. 

And I believe that this upheaval happened at the same time when Mars lost its magnetosphere. That loss of magnetosphere caused the solar wind to blow that planet's atmosphere away.

Loss of the magnetic field can happen because of the melting of the entire planet. In that case entire planet melted to lava. And then the giant turbulence in the lave destroyed its nucleus. The reason for that could be meteorite impact or some kind of electromagnetic radiation. 

There is a possibility that poorly sterilized probes transferred some of those bacteria to Mars. But if no match with the genetic material of those bacteria and bacteria on Earth means, those bacteria came from somewhere else. 

https://bigthink.com/life/organic-molecules-life-mars/

https://scitechdaily.com/ancient-mars-may-have-been-teeming-with-life-until-it-drove-climate-change-that-caused-its-demise/

https://scitechdaily.com/life-on-mars-ancient-bacteria-might-lurk-beneath-mars-surface/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars

Image 0) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars

Image 1) https://scitechdaily.com/ancient-mars-may-have-been-teeming-with-life-until-it-drove-climate-change-that-caused-its-demise/

Images 2,3,4) https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/mgs_cydonia.html

https://astronomyandtechnology.blogspot.com/

Could there be water on Mars?

The buried lake of Mars could just be layers of ice and rock. But maybe the astronauts can benefit from that ice. If that ice is water astronauts can use it simply by melting it. And if we are thinking about the Mars colony or Mars base, we must realize that it's safer for that colony that Mars has no living organisms. 

And then we must realize one thing. Water and life are not synonyms. Water doesn't automatically mean that there are alien lifeforms. And fossils of bacteria are not mean that there are some living creatures on that planet. And living bacteria don't mean that there are intelligent organisms. 

Well, the existence of water and liquid water are different things. There could be lots of water on Mars, but that water could be crystallized form in minerals like sulfates. It's possible to separate that water by warming those minerals. And sometimes pupils are making this kind of experiment in a chemistry course. But is there liquid water on Mars? That is a different thing. 

Today planet Mars is a very cold place. There is only weak volcanic activity. There is could be carbon dioxide ice under the surface. And if there is some kind of extra energy in those carbon dioxide ice pockets that can cause carbon dioxide vaporization. 

Also, giant dust storms are traveling across the desert. So there is a possibility that some kind of meteor impact or friction in sandstorms can rise the temperature in some places and form something liquid. But is that liquid thing some kind of carbon dioxide?  

Because of low pressure in the atmosphere, there is vaporized water in Mars' atmosphere. There is the possibility that there was some kind of life forms. But that doesn't mean the bacteria are living. There is the possibility that those bacteria are stoned or turned into fossils that involve things like methane gas. 

Methane gas found on Red Planet. There is suspicion that microscopic bacteria formed that. That doesn't mean that there are active bacteria on Mars. Even if bacteria formed that methane, it could be stored in the mineral pockets or the bacteria fossils millions of years ago. 

So maybe that methane is the remnant of the lost lifeforms. Maybe that methane was stored in bacteria millions of years ago. And those fossils kept that gas inside them until NASA's probes released that gas. 

In history, the planet Mars was a suitable place for the birth of life. But then its climate changed. That planet lost its entire lithosphere at least twice. And some asteroid impact changed its trajectory. The question is how far has life advanced on that planet? 

There is suspicion that there was some kind of bacteria on that planet before its climate changed. It's possible, that researchers can find remnants of those ancient bacteria. 

But if there are remnants of those bacteria only in a few places on the surface. That tells that some kind of meteorites brought those lifeforms to the Red Planet. When we see Mars in modern images we see the remnants of ancient rivers and seas. But where that water that created those ancient rivers was gone? 

Of course, the UV radiation from the sun can destroy water molecules. But there is no UV radiation in all places on Mars. Those ancient rivers formed after the last big catastrophe. That means Mars already lost lots of its mass and maybe its magnetic field turned weak. And there was still water in a short period after the last big impact. Was something vaporized in that water after the last big impact? 

Was some kind of radiation impact vaporized water? Was Mars hit by FRB (Fast Radio Burst) that raised the planet's temperature? Or could the UV radiation be so powerful that it broke all water molecules on that planet? 

The question is where has the water gone? And why that thing that vaporized water didn't destroy those ancient riverbeds? 

What raised the temperature on the entire planet without harming the geological structures of ancient rivers? If that thing was some kind of meteorite. Ancient riverbed geological structures should be destroyed during that impact. So, could there be some kind of meteorite rain? In that version, the small ice bites of carbon dioxide or methane ice impacted the atmosphere of the Red Planet. And that raised the temperature that vaporized water. 

https://scitechdaily.com/signs-of-water-on-mars-might-actually-be-an-indication-of-something-else/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars

Image: https://scitechdaily.com/signs-of-water-on-mars-might-actually-be-an-indication-of-something-else/

NASA's ingenuity helicopter made its 33rd mission on Red Planet.

"NASA’s Ingenuity Mars Helicopter acquired this image using its navigation camera. This camera is mounted in the helicopter’s fuselage and pointed directly downward to track the ground during flight. This image was acquired on November 6, 2021 (Sol 254 of the Perseverance rover mission) at the local mean solar time of 12:06:00. This was the date of Ingenuity’s 15th flight. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech"(ScitechDaily.com/NASA’s Ingenuity Helicopter Spots Foreign Object Debris on Mars)

NASA's Ingenuity helicopter made its 33rd mission to Red Planet's atmosphere. The interesting detail in this mission is one piece of foreign debris that is found on the surface. That debris is one of the most interesting things what that small helicopter has seen. 

But Ingenuity itself is an interesting system. A similar system that uses nuclear batteries can use to map the high atmosphere of gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn. And also Ingenuity can use to map the Venus and Titan moon. 

https://scitechdaily.com/nasas-ingenuity-helicopter-spots-foreign-object-debris-on-mars/

"Perseverance Workspace at ‘Skinner Ridge’: NASA’s Perseverance rover puts its robotic arm to work around a rocky outcrop called “Skinner Ridge” in Mars’ Jezero Crater. Composed of multiple images, this mosaic shows layered sedimentary rocks in the face of a cliff in the delta, as well as one of the locations where the rover abraded a circular patch to analyze a rock’s composition. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS"(ScitechDaily.com/Life on Mars? Latest Intriguing Organic Findings by NASA’s Perseverance Rover)

One of the most interesting questions is could the Ingenuity or Perseverance find life on Mars? 

The fact is that there is remaining organic material and structures that look like ancient bacteria. There are theories that Mars has changed its trajectory during history. Also, that planet faced even more violent geological upheavals than Earth. Mars lost its entire lithosphere. 

So there is a possibility. That on Mars-planet was some kind of primitive lifeforms like procaryotes that are similar to cyanobacteria on Earth. But that thing requires more research to confirm. 

If the positions where researchers find those bacteria are very rare. That tells they are coming from somewhere else than on Mars. But where lifeform can come from? One possibility is Earth.

 

There is the possibility that the bacteria traveled to Red Planet with probes that are not well-sterilized. But that thing means. There should be DNA (or RNA) molecules in the bacteria remnants. If bacteria is transferred to the Martian rock, that requires its living. If there is no DNA or RNA remnant, that means there should be some reason for that. 

Of course, the UV radiation of the Sun can explain why some bacteria are lost their DNA. But if the position where those fossils are found is mainly in shadow. That means the UV radiation will not reach those bacteria. 

The requirement that the UV radiation destroys the DNA or RNA is that the radiation can touch that molecule. If that molecule is in shadow that denies the possibility that the UV can destroy it. 

One interesting place where researchers can search for life or remnant of lifeform is the asteroid or dwarf planet Ceres. There is some kind of cryovolcanic activity on that asteroid. 

If there are similar bacteria or bacteria remnants that are found on Mars, that thing causes a re-estimation of the place where the first organisms came to Earth. But the first thing is that researchers must make sure that the fossils are bacteria remnants. Without DNA or RNA bites that thing is almost impossible. 

https://spaceref.com/science-and-exploration/ahuna-mons-on-ceres-a-new-and-unusual-type-of-volcanic-activity/

https://scitechdaily.com/life-on-mars-latest-intriguing-organic-findings-by-nasas-perseverance-rover/

The rocket that brings samples from Mars got its contractor. And that is Lockheed-Martin corporation.

Image 1)" This illustration shows a concept for a set of future robots working together to ferry back samples from the surface of Mars collected by NASA’s Mars Perseverance rover. Credit: NASA/ESA/JPL-Caltech" (ScitechDaily/NASA Selects Lockheed Martin Space To Build Rocket To Retrieve First Samples From Mars)

Lockheed-Martin took the contract for creating a rocket that brings the first samples from Mars. That launch will be the first that brings samples from other planets. The purpose of the mission is also to collect data for the first manned Mars mission.

 But that launch from another planet is same way remarkable as helicopter flight at Mars atmosphere. The rocket from Mars to Earth is the pathfinder for more difficult missions like bringing water samples from the icy moons of Jupiter. 

When we think about missions in the distant future. Those missions focused on more distant objects and planets like Neptune. There is needed a new type of technology to make the mission successful. 

Things like artificial intelligence are needed. To make the independently operating probes that can take the most interesting samples. The helicopter probes can mark places where their plasma spectrometers detect things like chlorophyll molecules. Or the independently operating helicopter can take samples from those points. The system that takes samples from Mars to Earth consists of three independent systems. 

The helicopter, the Perseverance rover, along with other rovers, and of course, the rocket are tools for that system. That rocket sends samples to Earth. And it can be similar to MGM-51 Lance tactical missile from the past. 

Image 2) MGM-52 Lance

And maybe some kind of laboratory vehicle where is more multi-use systems like scanning tunneling microscopes for pre-select samples that will load to rocket. Those samples are sent to Earth or Moon laboratories. That laboratory might connect to the launch platform of the rocket.

But that rocket must carry the fuel inside it for returning to Earth. Or it can use the electrolysis for breaking water on Mars. But that kind of system requires water. So the fuel and oxygen must load to rocket on Earth. The rocket itself can bases technology that is developed for tactical missiles like MGM-52 Lance or Pershing. The question is does that rocket use liquid or solid fuel. 

The moon-based laboratories must not be manned. The remote control modules can involve similar systems with BL-5 level laboratories. But on the Moon, those samples are not polluted. The remote-control systems make those modules easy to operate from Earth. 

Image 2)Daedalus spacecraft concept.

But of course, those samples can take to BL-5 laboratories that are needed to keep them sterile. If Earth bacteria infects those samples. They can cover or destroy the remains of life like Martian bacteria fossils.

The system that will travel to those distant planets is the probe that is controlled with highly sophisticated artificial intelligence. There might be man-looking robots onboard that are fixing errors and damages of those probes. The journey to Neptune takes a very long time and robot craft would not require that any person must stay years in the space. 

The probe for outer planets might look like Daedalus-probe that planned to send to Alpha Centauri. But for technical reasons that famous theoretical study project remains as the papers and drawings. Maybe someday in the future, that kind of plan turns to real space systems. And maybe that day is closer than we even think. If ten years ago somebody would say. Someday NASA will get samples from Mars to Earth that thing would claim pure fantasy. 

The system would be very independent. And it can select its samples itself. The capacity for independent operations is a key element for successful missions in Kuiper Belt. Those probes must select the target in seconds if they want to catch small asteroids that might be from other solar systems. After catching objects that seem interesting. The probe would put those asteroids in a cargo room and send them to Earth. 

And that is the final training for interstellar probes. The interstellar space probe is the thing that travels tens of years to stars. The technology that those missions require is similar. To that the probes that operate at the Kuiper belt require. 

https://scitechdaily.com/mars-ascent-vehicle-nasa-selects-lockheed-martin-space/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MGM-31_Pershing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MGM-52_Lance

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Daedalus

Image 1)https://scitechdaily.com/mars-ascent-vehicle-nasa-selects-lockheed-martin-space/

Image 2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MGM-52_Lance

Image 3)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Daedalus

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

The organic molecules in the Martian meteorite were not from aliens.

Image 1: "The Allan Hills 84001 meteorite courtesy of NASA/JSC/Stanford University. Credit: Courtesy of NASA/JSC/Stanford University" (ScitechDaily/The Search for Life on Mars: Organic Molecules in Martian Meteorite Not From Aliens.)

The organic molecules in the Martian meteorite were not from aliens. The fact is that proving the lifeform or fossil as extraterrestrial is not a very easy thing.  When we try to prove the origin of molecules or fossils there should be an environment where those samples would stay untouchable. 

The deep ice in polar ice caps might seem very promising. But in that environment, those samples are very easily polluted. When meteorite comes through the atmosphere it will heat. 

And when it touches the ice cap that temperature melts the ice. That thermal effect will activate bacteria and primitive algae in that ice. And some of those tiny organisms are searching for temperature. So the meteorite that comes from Mars is polluted by domestic organisms. And even if some procaryotes. 

Image 2) Planet Mars in natural color. (Wikipedia/Mars)

Which are the most primitive organisms on Earth traveled to the Earth from Mars they are hard to separate from domestic eucaryotes like cyanobacteria. For confirming the origin of the bacteria fossils the samples must be taken to Earth or some moon laboratory straight from Mars. That thing is necessary for keeping samples sterile. 

If there are some prokaryotic bacteria on Mars. That means those bacteria would be extremely small fossils. And the remaining metabolism of those hypothetical bacteria or their microscopic fossils uncovers their origin. The idea is that the metabolism forms chemicals that remain in those fossils or holes that were remaining of those hypothetical ancient bacteria. 

The theory of life on Mars goes like this. There was a short period in the history of that planet. When lifeforms could form. Those lifeforms would look similar to the cyanobacteria on Earth. But then meteorites or cosmic impact caused the planet Mars to lose its core and atmosphere. 

There is the possibility that those tiny lifeforms would remain active when the temperature of the surface decreased. But then the UV radiation whipped them out. This thing is the most common theory of the lifeforms of Mars. If those ancient lifeforms would somehow flow to Earth riding with some meteorite and remain active they are hard to separate from the domestic bacteria. 

There are needed DNA tests. When the DNA tests are made there must be confirmed Martian bacteria DNA or RNA for those tests. And UV radiation could destroy the entire genomes of those hypothetical bacteria. 

And there is the possibility that the remainings of the hypothetical Martian-origin bacteria. Like their genomes are destroyed by UV radiation. Of course, is the possibility that the impact that wiped out those organisms was not the last one. So if some bacteria came from Mars that bacteria could be a fossil. Or they could be vaporized while the meteorite flew to the sky by some cosmic impact. 

When the meteorite left Mars that thing was the drop of the melted material. And while the travel from Mars to Earth. It was under the influence of cosmic radiation. Also, the flow of the particles that came from the Sun terminated the organic material. That means that the alien bacteria could not even exist anymore in that meteorite even if there were the lifeforms on the red planet far away in history. 

https://scitechdaily.com/the-search-for-life-on-mars-organic-molecules-in-martian-meteorite-not-from-aliens/

Image 3) The advancing of the Image of Cydonian face. Images from the left: two first images. A and B  are from Viking.  Image C is The 2001 FaceA second "full-faced" image of the "Face" NASA/JPL MOC E03-00824. Note: the distinct "Feline" features on the right side. The erosion has destroyed the form of the face. And there is the small crater. So somebody might say, that could something whip that thing away in purpose. (Images by NASA)

Image 4)  The "Cydonian pyramids". : Pinterest

The alien story begins from here. The data is not confirmed. 

In some hypotheses, the (alien) civilizations would go interstellar travel only when they must do that thing. So if the hypothetical civilization would leave from the stars like Van Maanen 2. That thing means that those creatures would go on a one-way trip. 

When we are thinking about the colonization of the Milky Way we must understand one thing. That thing is not possible quite soon. If that project will someday start. The creatures who go on those journeys will never return. They would go on a one-way trip which takes even millenniums. 

Those creatures would travel in the form of genetic material. And during that journey, artificial intelligence would control the craft. When that craft will reach its target. The genetic material would transfer to cells. So those cells would be infected by the virus that transforms them into aliens. 

And things like the "face" of Mars (Image 2) and "Cydonian city" (Image 3) are bringing imaginational visions in the mid of people. There introduced a theory or hypothesis. That alien from some other solar system is behind those structures. And they would be created by some kind of robot. 

The theory is that the faces that might be lost are created by machines that are copying structures. Even if that thing would be true the alien would not necessarily use those structures. 

In some other vision, those structures came to NASA flight control accidentally. When some spy satellite used the frequency that the Viking probes used. The idea of the base where the Mars astronauts will use is taken from that theory. The idea is that the robots are making the base ready for astronauts before they will land on the red planet. 

https://scitechdaily.com/the-search-for-life-on-mars-organic-molecules-in-martian-meteorite-not-from-aliens/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Maanen_2

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

What if the red planet leaves in hands of Skynet?

travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/04/what-if-the-red-planet-leaves-in-hands-of-skynet/travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/04/what-if-the-red-planet-leaves-in-hands-of-skynet/travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/04/what-if-the-red-planet-leaves-in-hands-of-skynet/travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/04/what-if-the-red-planet-leaves-in-hands-of-skynet/travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/04/what-if-the-red-planet-leaves-in-hands-of-skynet/travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/04/what-if-the-red-planet-leaves-in-hands-of-skynet/travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/04/what-if-the-red-planet-leaves-in-hands-of-skynet/travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/04/what-if-the-red-planet-leaves-in-hands-of-skynet/travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/04/what-if-the-red-planet-leaves-in-hands-of-skynet/travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/04/what-if-the-red-planet-leaves-in-hands-of-skynet/travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/04/what-if-the-red-planet-leaves-in-hands-of-skynet/travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/04/what-if-the-red-planet-leaves-in-hands-of-skynet/

What if the "Tsar Bomba" would explode in the Mariana Trench"?

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-if-tsar-bomba-would-explode-in.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-if-tsar-bomba-would-explode-in.html

Strange painting from the medieval age might innovate the engineers to build the most modern Mars probe.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/strange-painting-from-medieval-age.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/strange-painting-from-medieval-age.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/strange-painting-from-medieval-age.html

NASA:s new laser propulsion can open the route to all Solar system

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/nasas-new-laser-propulsion-can-open.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/nasas-new-laser-propulsion-can-open.html

Onko Kuusta otetuissa kuvissa jotain outoa? Ja oliko NASA:lla suunnitelmissa salaisen aseman perustaminen Kuuhun?

NASA:n ottamissa kuvissa Kuun pinnasta on todella jotain outoa. Tietenkin osa näistä kohteista varmasti on Kuuhun laskeutuneiden luotainten  jäänteitä, mutta osa kuitenkin panee miettimään, mitä siellä oikeastaan on puuhattu, ja mitä noista Kuulennoista jäi sillon aikanaan kertomatta suurelle yleisölle, joka ihaili astronautteja, jotka hyppivät tuon kappaleen pinnalla.  Nuo objektit näyttävät muinaisilta kaupungeilta, mutta kun niitä ajatellaan vähän tarkemmin, niin silloin tietenkin voidaan olettaa, että nuo rakennelmat saattavat olla jäänteitä Neuvostoliiton tai USA:n aikanaan Kuuhun kaavailemista asemista, joiden tarkoitus ei ollut rauhanomainen.

Tuolloin tarkoitus oli luoda Kuuhun sotilastukikohta, missä asevoimat olisivat voineet operoida ydinaseiden avulla Maassa olevia kohteita vastaan. Projektin koodinimi oli “Project Luna”, ja se tähtäsi nimenomaan siihen, että Kuun pinnalle olisi asennettu  SS-20 tai Pershing-tyyppisiä aseita. Tai jos ajatellaan 1960-lukua, niin silloin aseet olisivat olleet ilmeisesti SS-14 sekä Jupiter-ohjus. Kun puhutaan noista 1960-luvun avaruusohjelmista, niin silloin pitää muistaa se, että monilla näistä projekteista oli aivan muita kuin tieteellisiä päämääriä. Kuuhun haluttiin sijoittaa ydinaseita sekä biologisen sodankäynnin laboratorioita, joissa tapahtuvat bakteerien sekä virusten testaustoimet olivat täysin kontrolloitavissa.

Kyseisen ohjelman ongelmana oli se, että kyseinen tukikohta olisi näkynyt maasta kaukoputkella, tai sitten tuo tukikohta olisi pitänyt sijoittaa Kuun kääntöpuolelle, jolloin se olisi vaatinut Kuun pinnalle sijoitetun kanaverkkoantennin kaivamista soraan, ja sitten olisi pitänyt kaapeli vetää kääntöpuolella olevaan tukikohtaan. Tuolloin kaivuutoimet olisi ehkä sitten huomattu Maasta, joten siksi tuo tukikohta ehkä peruttiin. Muuten uskoisin että termi "alien base" tai "alien technology" tarkoittavat sitä, että projekti suoritetaan niin sanotun "pimeän budjetin" kautta. Eli kyseessä on projekti jonka rahoitus kanavoidaan muiden projektien kautta.

Jos Kuuhun haluttiin sijoittaa ohjuksia, niin kaikkein helpoin tapa hoitaa asia, olisi käyttää Luna-16 tyyppisiä alustoja, joilla nuo ohjukset viedään Kuuhun, ja tuon kappaleen pieni painovoima takaa sen, että tuosta paikasta voidaan tehdä ydinasehyökkäys minne tahansa maapallon kohtaan. Tuolloin olisi helppoa käyttää korkeasti mobilisoituja ohjuksia, jotka laukaistaan maasta Kuuhun laukaisualutojen päällä, jotka lasketaan jarrurakettien avulla tälle kappaleelle. Tai sitten Kuuta haluttiin käyttää “Solar warden”-nimisessä ohjelmassa astronauttien levähdyspaikkana heidän matkatessaan avaruusasemalta Maahan. Tuo “Solar warden” oli silloin ohjelma, missä USA:n ilmavoimat tutki mahdollisuutta rakentaa avaruusasema kauas Aurinkoa kiertävälle radalle, ja sen kokoamiseen olisi käytetty Saturnus-V raketin tyhjiä polttoainesäiliöitä.

Kun mietitään tuon aseman tarkoitusta, niin ehkä USAF:n johto ajatteli käyttää sitä jonain asejärjestelmien kehityskeskuksena. Tai sitten sitä haluttiin käyttää johonkin muuhun toimintaan, mitä voidaan vain arvailla. “Solar warden” oli hankkeena sellainen, että sitä olisi varmaan ollut vaikeuksia perustella millekään Kongressin lautakunnalle.

Tuo ohjelma käsitti valtavan avaruusaseman rakentamisen kauas Kuun taakse, ja siinä piti käyttää sekä tyhjiä Saturnus V-raketin vaiheita sekä jättimäisiä mylar-palloja. Se olisiko tuosta asemasta tehty keinotekoisella painovoimalla  varustettu väline, on kuitenkin jäänyt historian hämärään. Tuo asema olisi saanut painovoimansa pyörimisliikkeen synnyttämästä keskipakovoimaan perustuvasta gravitaatiosta, joka olisi ollut heikompi kuin Maassa, jotta pyörimisliike ei olisi ollut liian kova, jolloin asema olisi revennyt kappaleiksi.

Jos tuo asema olisi toteutettu, niin sen miehistö lihasvoima putoaisi todella pieneksi. Ja jotta sopeutuminen Maan painovoimaan olisi nopeampaa, tarvitsisi miehistön tietenkin palautua ennen paluuta, ja siksi kuuasema olisi ollut tärkeä tuon operaation kannalta, jotta astronautti voisivat palauttaa lihasvoimansa siellä, koska Kuun pienempi painovoima olisi tehnyt tuosta helpompaa. Mutta kuten alussa kirjoitin, niin Kuuhun on vuosikymmenien aikana lähetetty kymmeniä luotaimia, joiden jäänteet lojuvat pitkin tuon kappaleen tasankoja, ja sen takia sieltä varmasti löytyy kaikkea mielenkiintoista.

https://youtu.be/jnRCvRvXmkk

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/darren-perks/solar-warden-the-secret-space-program_b_1659192.html

http://www.exopaedia.org/Luna

Mars ja sen salaisuudet eli miksi näitä kuvia salataan?

Olemme taas pääseet niihin paljon puhuttuihin "Marsin aikakirjoihin", joita kaksi tämän tekstin lopussa olevaa videota esittelee oikein auliisti. Kun noissa filmeissä olevista objekteista keskustellaan, niin silloin tietenkin kaikki me varmasti toivoisimme niiden olevan luonnonmuodostumia, mutta asia ei aivan näin yksinkertainen ole. Nämä objektit eivät kuitenkaan välttämättä ole mitään "marsilaisen sivilisaation" tuotteita, vaan ehkä ne sittenkin ovat ihmisten tekemiä. Neuvostoliitto sekä USA suunnittelivat Kuulennon jälkeen Mars-lentoa, mutta tuo ohjelma sitten peruttiin. Syynä olivat tekniset vaikeudet, eli Neuvostoliitolla oli vaikeuksia N-1-raketin kanssa, joka räjähti Baikonurissa vuonna 1972.


Tuo raketti oli Neuvostoliiton avaruusohjelman kannalta erittäin tärkeä, koska sillä piti viedä kiertoradalle tuon maan Mars-lentoja varten valmistama NERVA:a muistuttava ydinraketti, joka sitten piti panostaa Maan kiertoradalla, ja sitten se olisi kytketty Proton-raketilla laukaistuun miehitettyyn moduuliin, joka oli samantyyppinen kuin Saljut:issa käytetty paineistettu kapseli, ja sitten miehistö olisi toimitettu alukseen Sojuz-kapseleilla. Kun puhutaan Marsista sekä miehitetyistä lennoista sinne, niin silloin tällöin mieleeni tulee muistoja siitä, että NASA suunnitteli 1980-luvulla Mars-lentoja, jotka olisi tehty NERVA-ohjelman raketeilla. Miehitetty tento tälle planeetalle kestää todella pitkään verrattuna lentoon Kuuhun, ja tietenkin tuolloin pitää Marsissa olla tilaa, missä miehistö voi oleskella. Tuo "mars-asema" olisi suunnitelmien mukaan valmistettu puhallettavista rakennelmista, ja siellä olisi käytetty ydinreaktoria energian tuotantoon.

Nuo puhallettavat rakennelmat olisivat muistuttaneet tavallisia kuplahalleja, mutta ne olisi tehty vahvemmasta materiaalista, ja niiden seinät olisivat olleet kaksikertaista mylar-kevlar-komposiittia, mikä olisi suojannut miehistöä mahdollisilta meteoriittien törmäyksiltä. Koska Marsin kaasukehä on niin ohut, niin silloin piti NASA:n insinöörien oli varmistettava, että asemassa oleva vuoto ei sitten aiheuttaisi vaaraa miehistölle, joten siksi he tekivät kaikkensa asioiden sujumiseksi täysin oikein. Kuitenkin 1980-luvuksi suunniteltu lento peruuntui budjettien takia, ja siksi NASA tai Neuvostoliiton avaruusvirasto saattoivat lähettää tuonne Marsiin tarvikkeita valmiiksi, jotta lento olisi onnistunut.

Kuitenkin kun lento sitten peruttiin, niin nuo esineet saatettiin vain jättää tälle planeetalle. Osa noista Marsin pinnalta löydetyistä esineistä varmasti ovat peräisin epäonnistuneista luotaimista, jotka ovat murskautuneet planeetan pintaan, koska niiden laskuvarjo on liian pieni. Osa noista kuvista saattaa olla peräisin esimerkiksi halleista, joissa noita välineitä kokeiltiin, ja osa kuvista taas on photoshopattu, mutta saattaa olla niin, että avaruusvirastojen työntekijät ovat testanneet myös esimerkiksi hiirten selviämistä tuolla planeetalla, jotta saadaan tutkittua mahdollista biologista uhkaa, minkä lentäjät ehkä kohtaisivat Marsissa.

Tuollaisia kokeita varten rakennetaan usein halleja, joissa simuloidaan kohteessa olevia olosuhteita, jotta voidaan todeta, että muuttuuko eläimen aggressiivisuus tuossa ympäristössä.  Mutta tietenkin suuri osa niistä varmaan on photoshopin avulla tehtyjä. Tai sitten simulaatiohalleissa otettua kuvaa noista hiiristä on päätynyt Internetiin, mikä tietenkin on mahdollista. En kuitenkaan usko, että noita olioita on Marsiin päästetty, koska ne likaavat tuon planeetan, ja tekevät biologiset kokeet planeetan pinnalla marsista päin katsottuna endeemisen elämän etsimiseksi mahdottomiksi.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/621513/Forget-mouse-Mars-monkey-found-Red-Planet-NASA-UFO-Sightings-Daily-Scott-Waring

Tällaisia ovat esimerkiksi Neuvostoliiton Mars-sarjan-luotaimet, joita kohtasi oikea epäonnen suma, ja sen takia Viking I-luotaimesta tuli ensimmäinen alus, joka otti kuvia Marsin pinnasta.Tai sitten nämä oudot esineet ovat peräisin kokeista, joita tehtiin turvallisen Mars-lennon varmistamiseksi. Mars-ohjelmien peruuntuminen johtui paitsi budjeteista, niin myös turvallisuudesta, ja itse olen ajatellut, että jos nuo NASAN tai Neuvostoliiton avaruustutkimusta harjoittavien virastojen työntekijät olivat laukaisseet esimerkiksi astioita Marsiin ilman lupaa, ja ohjelma olisi peruttu, niin he eivät ehkä tätä asiaa olleet maininneet poliittisille päättäjille, ja ehkä näille "luurangoille" löytyy myös luonnollinen selitys. Eli saattoi olla niin, että jonmpi kunpi virastoista laukaisi Marsiin joitain orankeja tai vastaavia kädellisiä, joiden avulla olisi simuloitu avaruuslennon vaikutusta ihmisiin, mutta kun hypoteettinen alus sitten laskeutui, niin silloin tapahtui ehkä sellainen asia, että sen alla aukeni hiilidioksiditasku, ja sitten tuo kapseli putosi siihen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-8KBJfEa5Y&index=2&list=TLGG3m_vpgjz4TMyNzAzMjAxNw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdeE3Rf4xk8&list=TLGG3m_vpgjz4TMyNzAzMjAxNw

Vain yksi kivi vai jotain aivan muuta (Ovatko marsin kallot ehkä jonkun mars-lentokokeen jäänteitä vai tavallisia kiviä)

Kuva I

Kuvassa yksi (Kuva I) on yksi legendaarisista "marsin kalloista, jotka ovat kiehtoneet ihmisiä siitä lähtien, kun ne löydettiin Curiosity-luotaimen toimesta.Eräiden lehtien mukaan kyseessä olisi tavalliset kivet, joiden uurteet olisivat jotenkin muodostuneet hiekan hangatessa pehmeämpää kiviainesta pois. Toiset taas puhuvat salaisista avaruusohjelmista, joissa sitten on kadonut astronautteja. Kolmas teoreetikkojen sekä tutkijoiden ryhmä puhuu siitä, että ehkä Neuvostoliitto tai USA lähetti esimerkiksi orankeja kohti Marsia testatakseen tulevan Mars-aluksen järjestelmiä sekä muita välineitä. Ja sitten jotain meni vikaan, ja tuo alus ehkä murskaantui punaisen planeetan pintaan.

Se mikä noissa Marsin pinnan kuvissa ihmetyttää on se, miksi NASA:n luotaimet eivät ole ottaneet kuvia muista Marsiin laskeutuneista luotaimista, kuten neuvostoliiton Mars I ja II aluksista, jotka ikään kuin katosivat jälkiä jättämättä. Joten tässä sitten mietin sitä, että oltiinko mars-lentoa jo alettu kaikessa hiljaisuudessa valmistella, ja ensimmäinen eläviä olioita sisältävä koealus oli ehkä jo lähetetty kohti punaista palneettaa, jotta voitiin varmistua että mikään ei tuossa julkisuuteen esitettävässä testissä menisi sitten pieleen, joten saattaa olla niin, että jompikumpi supervalta oli valmistautunut jo palautuskokeeseen, mikä tarkoittaa todellisuudessa täydellistä tehtäväsimulaatiota, missä alus laskeutuu kohdeplaneetan pinnalle, ja lentää sieltä takaisin.

NERVA-moottori
Kuva II

Tuo Neuvostoliiton Mars-ohjelma oli oikeastaan paljon tärkeämpi kuin kuu-ohjelma, jota avaruusohjelman johto piti vain koekenttänä tähän todelliseen "tehtävään" valmitauduttaessa. Mutta tuo Neuvostoliiton avaruusohjelma tai siinä kehitetty alus oli hiukan monimutkaisempi, koska jättimäisen N-1-raketin piti viedä tarvittava ydinrakettivaihe kiertoradalle, ja sitten D-5 Proton veisi varsinaisen Mars-matka-aluksen sekä pienemmät Sojuz-Fregat-raketit kuljettaisivat laskeutumisaluksia kieroradalle, jossa niistä telakoitaisiiin kokonaisuus. Ongelma oli näet siinä, että tuo ydinrakettivaihe, joka oli tekniiikaltaan vastaava USA:n NERVA:n kanssa olisi hajotessaan voinut levittää plutoniumia pitkin siperian metsiä, joten se piti ampua ilman ydinpolttoainetta vain vedyllä lastattuna, ja sitten tuo ydinreaktori olisi panostettu kiertoradalla työntämällä useissa erissä ammutut polttoainesauvat paikalleen.

Taiteilijan näkemys NERVA-raketista
Kuva III

Eli hidastimena käytetyt hiilisauvat olisi voitu pitää reaktorin sisällä, ja reaktorin jäähdytys olisi hoidettu valtavilla jäähdytyssiivillä, jotka olisivat muistuttaneet sälekaihdinta. Ne olisi avattu vasta kiertoradalla, ja niillä tuo ydinreaktori olisi päässyt eroon ylilämmöstä kun tuolla ydinraketilla olisi lennetty marsiin. Joten saattoi olla niin, että Neuvostoliiton avaruusohjelman johto päätti kokeilla tuota alusta salaa ennen kuin he olisivat lähettäneet virallisen koelennon  miehistöineen marsiin. Näin he eivät olisi nolanneet itseään politbyroon edessä, mikä olisi tarkoittanut lähtöä uudelleenkoulutukseen siperiassa sijaiseviin kuntoutuslaitoksiin eli tekemään metsätöitä. Mutta tietenkin tämä on vain spekulaatiota. Lisätietoa aiheesta saa Googlesta hakemalla hakusanoilla "martian skulls"

pseudotiedetta.blogspot.fi