Cogito ergo sum. I think; therefore I am (René Descartes, French philosopher)

   .     Can humans be their ancestors themselves? The remaining of the genetic legacy is the main topic in some thrillers, and the thing is that the firms like Cryonics institute are offering services, that persons can store their bodies in liquid nitrogen. Some of them are waiting for waking up when the technology is advanced so much, that their illnesses can cure. But things like genomes can also store in cryogenic conditions. The genomes can store in the form of cells, and the things like embryos can store in liquid nitrogen for a very long time. And that thing causes a question, can a human be themselves their ancestors? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The answer is simple: there are two main ways which makes that thing possible even if there are no time machines: 1) The person would wake up from the cryogenic ice after a couple of generations and then marries their descendant. 1B) The person can be stored in the form of an emb

        . A single point in space can spin continuously without becoming tangled. Notice that after a 360-degree rotation, the spiral flips between clockwise and counterclockwise orientations. It returns to its original configuration after spinning a full 720 degrees. (Wikipedia, spin) (Image I) The spin and the extraposition The particles like electrons are like the ball of yarn. They are forming from energy. The energy is putting the superstrings in the form that looks like a ball of yarn. One day the energy that forms those particles ends. And the superstrings are turning back to the wave movement. And the thing that causes the loss of energy, or vaporizing those fermions is called spin. The spin is the thing, what we are calling the rotation of the electrons and other fermions. The spin is no actually the rotation. It's the back and worth rotation of the electrons. The movement is back and worth it because there are many axels on fermions. And that means the spin cannot cross t

        .   The energy fragments can create material. The physicist suggests that the material is forming from energy fragments. So the material is like a solid version of energy. And the thing that makes scientists think that is the material can transform into energy and that thing happens all the time in places like fireplaces. When the wood is burning parts of that thing changes to gasses like carbon monoxide. And if we would weigh the material that is taking apart in this reaction we should get the same weight that is the weight of the gas and solid material that are participating in the fire reaction. So in this example, we are thinking about the possibility that all material can meter. The mirror reaction of this thing would be the cold fire. There is a hypothetical possibility that the atoms would put back to the form of wood, and this counter-reaction where atoms and molecules are reforming after the fire, what has broken them. Theoretically, nothing denies that counter-reactio

  The world has made of fire, air, land, and water. The material and energy are things, that are the same. We know that we can change material to energy or wave movement but we don't know how to make an opposite reaction. We cannot change energy or wave movement back to material or rather saying particle form. If we are zooming material like water and use high enough accuracy, we can see molecules, that are looking like teddy-bears. Those molecules are forming of atoms, which are mainly the electron cores, which are "empty". The thing, what might look like solid entirety is forming of electrons, what is orbiting the nucleus of the atom. And each electron is like a small ball. In everyday life, we are turning material to energy in powerplants and other kinds of places, but the fact is that we cannot move energy back to the kinetic material, and in this case, we must ask, is electron kinetic material? If we are thinking that an electron is a nice little ball, w

     Wave movement and dimensional theories   https://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2020/12/10/wave-movement-and-dimensional-theories/

     . Image I Cognito Ergo Sum II Cognito Ergo Sum "I think I am," said René Descartes, and the question is does the thinking mean that person or creature exists. So when we are thinking that only aware creatures can think we must realize that there is a question what makes this Descartes quote one of the most interesting topics in history. That question is that would the creature need the ability to think that it exists? If we are thinking about things like stones they exist. We can test that thing by kicking the stone without a shoe, and that thing proves that thing exists. So does the ability to react to some kind of things like yelling by saying, "are you all right" mean that the creature understands the meaning of the words? The artificially intelligent robot can emulate feelings by looking at certain marks from the face of a human. When the volume of the speech rises very high that robot can say "please low down your noise". Or if a person seems to