The next writing is provocative. And the reason for that is that it would handle the thing that is called society without money. What if we have personal limits on how many times we are allowed to go to restaurants? Or how many pants and shoes we are allowing to use at a certain time? Would that thing seem something radical or a little bit too radical? The radical ideas are breaking the old-fashion economics. And the idea is to make the world more democratic and less pollutive because there is no financial race.
The origin of money is a need to control the use of the products. And we are always lived with money. Money is the thing that is creating our value and the reason. Why we are going to work. But what if we would replace money by using limits? In that case, the person would get limit how many pants, skirts, and other things like food the person is allowed to take out from shops. So the thing is that if we have only limited what we can take from the shops we can replace money by using some more democratic and justifying system.
But the thing why we are not doing that thing is that it requires new attitudes. The world without money is one of the things that is always justified as fantasy. The thing is that if we are trying to make something new type of economics. We must renew the entire society. And leaving the money away and replacing it with the limits seeming very radical.
When we are thinking reality we are going to work every day because we want to earn money. Money is the thing that is making the lifestyle better and allows us to make things like playing tennis. But when we are thinking about real life and working we must ask one question.
Are we doing productive work all the time while we are working? This is one of the questions that we might ask. The thing is that money which is the basis of western economics causes competition in production. A large number of production keeps the price of the product low. The lowest price products are meant for the introduction of the product.
Normally people are buying the middle-price product. But all the time when some person is buying some middle price product that means cheap and expensive products are leaving in the shop. The most expensive products are meant for professionals. Merchandise is produced too much. And the problem is that in every year in the markets will be brought the new models. The new models guarantee the incoming money flow to the producers.
The new models guarantee the sale of the product. The old products are not shared free with the people. The reason for that is that people could wait over the new year and then get old products. Those old products are sold at a low price because the shops want to get all money from the products that they can get. Overproduction is the thing that causes emissions and waste of natural resources. So what if someday happens the revolution that we would give up the use of money and competition? Would that thing turn emissions down and make the world a better place to live? Maybe, maybe not. These kinds of things are utopia in the modern world. But what if we try to change our attitudes?
