In the world of competition is no altruism

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/


Kimmo Huosionmaa

Let's think about race, and the prize is high. The next person, who takes the part of the race would give you the drink, do you really take it? This is the really interesting thing because if some person is the competitor, we should ask: why this person wants to help us? The answer would be very different than we hope. That person can give us narcotics with that drink, and that would make the disqualification for us.


The same rule can be used in every social situation in the world. If we meet some nice looking man or woman and want to date with that person, we must worry if the person who introduces that man or woman would be the spouse of the introduced person. If the husband or wife are making dates for their spouse, there is something wrong. And if the best recommendations come from the worst competitor, we should think, why this company wants to increase our business?


And if we are looking for the job, we should ask ourselves, why other unemployed people would want us to help us to look for the dream job?  They are also competitors in that process, and the thing, that they would give the telephone number for some other unemployed person could be something, what we don't want to happen. That number can be given for collecting the phone numbers from persons, who are unemployed. And then those phone numbers would give to some telephone marketing companies.


Those phone numbers can cost the home for those people if they order stuff from those telephones. If they are ordering the stuff, there would be change, that persons cannot pay those merchandise. And then the flat must be sold if there is no change to pay the ordered things. Also, those phone numbers might be given for collecting the social relationships from the unemployed people.


If we don't worry about that kind of offers, they can get them to some pyramid hoax ring, where the investors say, that if you would give the money in that organization, that would bring good profits. But in some cases, money just is lost, and the center persons would get good money from the persons, who have given their property in those businesses, what are controlled from some ex-eastern block states.  And this makes the police actions difficult. If this kind of thing is suspected the police report must be made immediately if that thing is noticed.

Why James Smithson gave his money to the United States by testament?

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When chemist and mineralogist James Smithson (1765-1829)  died in Genoa 1829 this man left all his property to the United States of America, and that's why there is a Smithsonian Institute in that country. That famous institute is behind many scientific theories and practical solutions. But the question is, why this man gave all his money to the United States is quite remarkable, thing, but the gift was accepted until 1835, and the institute was established in 1849.


Smithson ever visited in the United States and the reason why this man gave the money to the United States was that the first man, who suppose to take the property died nine years before Smithson, and that's why the money went to the United States. The reason, why Congress didn't accept the testament is claimed to be, that the relationship between Great Britain and the United States were tight, and that's why that money was not able to take until 1835.


Sometimes there were claiming, that somebody murdered beneficiary of the testament, and that's why money went to the USA. And the reason for that testament is claimed, that Smithson didn't accept Great Britain's social conservatism, and that was the reason for giving that money to the United States. But there might be another reason for that. Maybe Smithson took some money from the independence fighters and loaded them for those people before America started to fight for its independence.


Sometimes I have thought that if Smithson used his own name in that case, and changed money for independence fighters for buying the equipment to the independence fight, would that money hard to explain.  And if Smithson would return the money, what left over after those purchases, would that man be in terrible trouble. So the Senate wait until Smithson was dead, and then allowed the return of that money. Maybe they except, that some persons, who would be suffered by those actions, were dead, and that was covered the secrets of the revolution.

Sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Smithson

Kleptomaniac is the ritual thief, but the thing what drives people to those actions is often hidden in the past

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/kleptomaniac-is-ritual-thief-but-thing.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/kleptomaniac-is-ritual-thief-but-thing.html