Species hybrides.

  Species hybrides. 

The Chinese researchers transplanted human neurons to mice. 

This kind of research is possible in countries like China. If those experiments are accepted. Or seen as useful by governments, that means that those tests are well-authorized. The human neurons in the mouse's brain make it possible to research those neuron reactions in certain situations. That gives researchers more information on how things happen between neurons. But that also makes it possible to make things like intelligent puppies. Those genetically engineered pets can make people's lives easier. They can offer help to people. Who have certain limitations. 

Staling and his idea of humanzees, the monkey soldiers, still live in memories. The humanzee-soldiers were suitable for Stalin’s ideology. He wanted soldiers who don’t think. Their purpose was only to serve his personal ideas. And that means they should not think of anything else than how to serve the “Father sunshine”. Stalin wanted robots, not humans. The only accepted morality and ethics in Stalin’s Soviet Union were what Stalin wanted. The only accepted ethics was to follow the rules of the secret police and Joseph Stalin. And the only purpose of research and life was to serve the nation and Stalin himself. 

But the intelligent pets are not the only thing that makes this kind of research very interesting. Intelligent animals can perform many jobs for the military and law enforcement. But those intelligent pets are also key to Stalin’s mad dream about monkey soldiers. Those monkey soldiers were soldiers who had monkey brains. And Stalin’s notorious operator in that idea was Ilya Ivanov (1870-1932). That person transplanted a dog's head between two individuals. Ivanov had no knowledge of the immune system.  

That made those visions of the humanzee useless. But today, technology allows researchers to create hybrid species. And maybe the horrifying visions of the humanzees live in some dictator's head. Today, there is a possibility. To connect DNA bites from different species. And that makes those things that Ivanov tested possible.

And those experiments included the cases where an animal’s head was cut off and a life support system kept that head alive. During 20s technology was very primitive. But when we think about today’s bionic systems. It's possible to connect a human or monkey head to a robot body. The robot will be connected to the robot by using the spinal cord. The computer in the robot's body transforms neural signals into the computer-controlled servo systems that move the robot's body. These kinds of things can be fascinating and notorious things. The ability to transplant human neurons to mice or dogs is the thing. That can transform. Our way to see things. 

"Chrysalis could house several generations until it enters Alpha Centauri, where it could shuttle people to the surface of the planet Proxima Centuri b. (Image credit: Giacomo Infelise, Veronica Magli, Guido Sbrogio', Nevenka Martinello and Federica Chiara Serpe​)" LiveScience, Proposed spacecraft could carry up to 2,400 people on a one-way trip to the nearest star system, Alpha Centauri)

Chrysalis, a theoretical generation ship to Alpha Centauri. 

The interstellar flight requires advanced biotechnology. If there is a disease. That requires immediate and effective reactions. Those people who will go on that journey must not have any social relationships with people on  Earth. They must not have any genetic weakness that can cause mental illnesses. And they must have a strong immune system that can clean their body in the case of infections. When those people go, they go forever. 

Another interesting thing is that researchers are starting to create space mouse babies. Those rodents will be born and grow in a microgravity environment. These kinds of experiments can give a boost to our way across the solar system or even to stars. There are models that some researchers call “Solar Warden”. In that model, in the future, there will be space humans who live their entire life in a microgravity environment. They will be born in spacecraft or space stations that travel around the solar system. 

Those people will ever visit to Earth and they spend their entire life in zero gravity. That kind of thing will happen. If we someday send humans to other solar systems. If we send a generation ship to Alpha Centauri, that journey takes 400 years. So, if we send that craft on that trip, we will never see those people again. There are generations between us and those colonists. But before we send that craft called “Chrysalis” on that one-way trip, we must change our culture. “Chrysalis” is a theoretical plan to create an interstellar spacecraft. But maybe someday. We will handle that technology. 

But the biggest problem is that those people who travel in that craft will also lose contact with Earth. Those people will spend their entire life in that craft. So the Earth will become very distant to those colonists who travel between Earth and Alpha Centauri. The Chrysalis takes 400 years for that trip. That means if the Alpha Centauri civilization sends this kind of generation ship to Earth. And that craft arrives tomorrow, they should send that thing in the 17th century. If that trip takes exactly 400 years, that hypothetical craft will be sent in the year when Cassini was born and King Charles 1 ruled England. The 30-year war began a couple of years earlier.

https://www.livescience.com/space/space-exploration/proposed-spacecraft-could-carry-up-to-2-400-people-on-a-one-way-trip-to-the-nearest-star-system-alpha-centauri

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3322054/chinese-scientists-transplant-human-brain-cells-mice-boosting-pleasure-levels

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanzee

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilya_Ivanov

Two films about Ivanov and his dark ideas. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2ius0Qw4Ek&t=323s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6HRK9Xc4eU

The new way to solve 200 years old mathematical problems.

"A mathematician at UNSW Sydney has introduced a groundbreaking new approach to one of algebra’s oldest unsolved problems." (ScitechDaily, Researchers Solve “Impossible” Math Problem After 200 Years)

Researchers from Australia solved one of math's toughest problems. Normally we use Norwegian mathematician Niels Henrik Abell's method to solve some complex polynomials. But those things always cause grey hair to mathematicians. 

Things like artificial intelligence are tools. That can be used to solve many problems. Things like third or higher-degree polynomials are problematic for computers and humans because those formulas are very complicated.

So, when we try to solve things like third or higher-class polynomial formulas we must realize that at least in some cases. 

When we try to solve things like fourth-degree polynomials, we must understand that this polynomial function includes two second-class polynomial functions, or we can divide that thing into one-third and one first-class polynomial function. In the same way, all polynomials involve an X-number of the second-class polynomes. And if the polynomial is uneven like a third or fifth-class polynomial it also involves one first-class polynomial. 

So: 

f(x) ax^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e

is 

(x^2+bx+c)*(x^2+bx+c)

or

(X^3+bx^2+cx+d)*(x+d)

Higher-degree polynomials are always the combinations of the first and second-class polynomials. The fifth class of polynomials involves two second-class, or second-degree polynomials and one first-class polynomial. 

So 

f(x) ax^5+bx^4+cx^3+dx^2+ex+f

involves 

(x^2+bx+c)*(x^2+bx+c)(x+c)

Two-second degrees and one first-degree polynomial. 

The sixth-degree polynomials involve three second-degree polynomials

f(x) ax^6+bx^5+cx^4+dx3+ex^2+fx+g

Can be divided into three second-class polynomials. 

(x^2+bx+c)*(x^2+bx+c)*(x^2+bx+c)

The seventh-degree polynomials involve 

Three second and one first-class polynomials. 

Etc...

https://scitechdaily.com/researchers-solve-impossible-math-problem-after-200-years/

When the most advanced tool becomes the enemy of advance.

Why...

Above this text is the image that is not made by using AI. I took that image yesterday evening. That thing required a little bit of trouble and time. Walking into that point, taking my cell phone, and taking that picture took time. When I looked at that picture I realized why people use AI in many things. AI offers easy things to get the job done. That easy tool allows people to make thousands of lines of code in minutes. 

That is possible if the person uses some code libraries. And that makes a person effective. But that thing is not good for advancement and innovation. Also, that way of making programs is not good for data security. If some hackers get those code libraries that allow them to break the systems those codes are used. 

We know that thing. But we ever ask why person makes that thing? Why does that person use libraries and copy-paste? Why that person uses code, that somebody gave to the hard disk? The answer is this something forces a person to make things like that. The nice, well-done code in the hard disk makes work effective. And we can say that generative AI, large LLM, or whatever we call that thing is only to those libraries. 

We can be effective and always use that method to make things. That can make an impression. But then we can say that this method doesn't allow us to advance our programming skills. And that means the AI kills productivity and skills. But is the AI guilty? 

Do we bark the wrong tree? Should we prosecute the need to be effective for that thing? People use AI and code libraries because they have no time to learn things. People are so hurry, that they have no time to learn things. And if they make mistakes they are fired. That forces people to use AI. 

The biggest problem with algorithms is they use existing information. They don't call any telescopes or particle accelerators to create experiments that they can produce new things. They just seek existing information and reorder it. If we start to use AI more and more to become effective we are facing situations in which we don't get new innovations. 

New innovations are things that make the world more advanced. But when we make innovation. We process thought into the product. Without thought is not innovation. Because our mind is to bind to memories we are in trouble with new things.  That means we should create a mind that is not dependent on memories. But that thing is not very easy to make. Almost everything that we make is bound to memories. 

Algorithms do not create things. They just connect existent data into new entirety. And the question is this: do we let ourselves turn into the AI's? Mechanical minds can search existing information but cannot create anything new. 

If we don't let people innovate that means that we will not create new things. Innovations require time and space. And that thing is not a thing that fits into the idea of productivity and effectiveness. 

Algorithms are tools that make many things faster than humans. That is the reason why we use them. The question is always this: do we someday make algorithms that rule people? When we make things by using algorithms we can find an easy way to make things. Algorithms make our lives easier. They search for things from databases. Then, AI can make many things better than we can. We are afraid. That AI helps people to make things. 

Like fake doctoral theses. We are always afraid of that. People lose their creativity when they use AI. We ever ask why we leave our work to the AI. We see that things happen, never asking "why"? 

The problem with the algorithm is that AIs don't make anything new.  They just collect information from the networks. AIs build new entireties using information. That already exists. And that is the problem with AI. The problem is that the system requires effective working. During working days people don't cheer programmers and other people to make new decisions. The requirement for effectiveness is the thing that destroys creativity and advancement. 

People are afraid of remote working because it destroys innovation. But how many hours in week do we use for innovations? Do we really make innovations in our offices? Or do we just read newspapers and reports and make things that have been made 1000 times before? 

Many people think. That innovation is the case, where one person talks and the other listens. The problem with innovation and creativity is that people are afraid of failure. Failure is somehow a non-accepted thing, and that means we make many times things that we made many times before. 

Because. People are afraid of things like grammar mistakes they think that they must let the AI make their texts. Programmers are afraid of mistakes.  Fixing mistakes steals their and other worker's working time. That is the reason why the working environment forces people to use AI. And that is the best way to destroy productive thinking and innovation. 

The AI makes people look like effective. But that system uses only existing information. That is the limit of the AI. Even if we want to make images using AI, we must give orders to it. The AI is like the drawing program that follows orders that we give. That allows us to create new worlds. But that thing doesn't advance our painting skills. 

The memory makes humans effective. Imagination is the thing that connects memory bites together new way. That allows us to create new things. Memories and the connections with existing memories are the things that limit the imagination. The requirement for innovation is an idea, that doesn't come from emptiness. 

Memories are stored in our memory cells. When we use imagination we just reorder those things that we can call memory pixels into the new entirety. Those things are like puzzles that we can reorder. 

The big advance would be the mind. That is not connected with memory. The memory-independent mind is something that we cannot imagine. We use memories to create new entities. And it's hard to even imagine a tool that doesn't use memories. That thing is the tool that can make the next step for innovations and society. 

Maybe the future is genetically engineered humans.

    Maybe the future is genetically engineered humans. 

An imprisoned researcher who genetically modified babies believes that genetically manipulated humans are the future. When we think about genetic engineering and our genomes, we can ask why genetic engineers are not removing things like diabetes, Alzheimer and AIDS away by using genetic engineering. In the same way, somebody can ask why we don't give gene therapy for CP-handicapped and other kinds of people who have an error in their chromosomes. 

Some people say that this kind of gene therapy is against morals or ethics, but in the same way, we can ask if the lives of those people are so nice that we should not fix their genomes.  Why cannot we think of things like hereditary diseases as one disease like some virus infection or something like that? The fact is this the world is full of people who have money to take gene therapy. Gene therapy can improve IQ. 

And that kind of therapy gives many more abilities. The human intelligence is like many other types of intelligence. It creates systems that are more or less intelligent. So intelligence creates other intelligence. And that's why people are interested in things like AI. Genetic engineering can increase people's IQ. 

IQ is only one of the things that makes people productive. That productive thinking makes us create machines and other things to dominate the world. And that's why our nervous system and brains are the promising objects for genetic engineering. Genetic engineering makes it possible that people will get immune resistance against some viruses. And then that virus can turn into the ultimate weapon. 

The ability to interconnect species makes it possible. Humans will get better senses, stronger muscles or faster reactions, and faster renewing tissues. The ability to transform the DNA allows us to remove cancer from our species. Cancer is one of the deadliest diseases in the world. Sharks have no cancer and that thing makes those animals interesting. 

Same way sharks have electric senses, and humans have similar senses. That allows us to read other people's thoughts. All senses and abilities that species have without depending on species coded in the DNA, and what would you make with the ability to read thoughts or muscles that make you as strong as a gorilla or anaconda? 

In the same way, some reptilians are immune to the strongest neural poison, botulinum. That means nerve agents like VX do not affect cobras. 

Innovation requires full knowledge of the system that a person wants to use. The other things that the innovation requires are the ability and willingness to model the system. And that is a problem in innovations. People must have the ability to make new things. And they must dare to share their ideas. 

When we manipulate our brains we make things that will change the world. Brains are the creators of the systems and machines that allow humans to dominate the world. 

The human brain should be the user of the AI. That means humans should be the part who gives orders. And the AI should be the thing that follows those orders. But sometimes we are facing people who let machines think for them. AI will not turn master in our society if we do not give that position to it. 

https://bgr.com/science/imprisoned-scientist-who-gene-edited-babies-wanted-to-transform-the-human-species/

Image: ScitechDaily.com

In 1992 Donated twin embryos were successfully born.

Researchers put 1992 identical twin embryos in the cryostat. And today those twins were born. Those embryos were gifted to science, and then they are stored in nitrogen. These kinds of experiments are interesting. 

Those embryos are aborted before researchers stored them in liquid nitrogen. And then, after 30 years, they were born. These kinds of things are interesting things. 

Because the researchers must guarantee the parent's position. And that thing includes the children's right to know about their background. There is the possibility that those people feel anger against their biological parents. 

In that case, there is a possibility. That this kind of research is limited to the deliverer's lifetime. That means the researchers should make those research must do after the deliverers are dead. This kind of thing is serious. We must concern about the human rights of those born children. 

When we think about embryos, that returned to life after spending 30 years in liquid nitrogen. That thing brings new information for cosmology. And interplanetary and even interstellar missions. 

The purpose of research is to bring new information to science and technology. Genetic engineering is one of the fastest-advancing sectors in science and engineering. Today we can interconnect genomes through the species. And we must take care of the things that we create. 

We must realize that things like level of intelligence are making organisms dangerous. But if we create something intelligent, we must realize, that those creatures must have some kind of rights. Human rights like the right to vote depend on the level of intelligence. So someday we must think about the voting right of the creature that looks different from what we are. 

Image and sources

https://futurism.com/neoscope/twins-born-donated-embryos-1992

The near-the-death experiences are not "death experiences".

Researchers found the effect of some kind of psychedelic chemicals that the neural system can produce. Those chemicals are causing hallucinations that are making some people shamans. The purpose of those hallucinogens is to remove pain in extreme moments. Those chemicals are stronger than LSD. And they are linked to something extremely mysterious things. 

The psychedelic chemicals seem to have some kind of mission in the human nervous system. And one of those missions is to decrease pain and prepare people for extreme situations. There are many things that we don't know about nature. We know that there is an unknown and invisible world. 

But the fact is that researchers are for solving mysteries. And one of the biggest mysteries is why brain activity increases on both sides of death. We know that thoughts are the electric vortex. And the same way we can think that soul is an electric phenomenon. 

So the brain is the hardware, and that electric vortex called the soul is the operating system of the thing that we call the brain. There is magnesite in neurons. That mineral makes the grey color of neurons. And it's mission could be to transport electric impulses inside neurons. But magnesite also causes the nervous system can receive electromagnetic signals. 

The fact is that the things that happen at the moment of death are interesting and same time creepy. At the moment of death, the brain activity of the dying person increases. And after the exit is the second hill in the EEG curves. Some people say that it seems like something whips off the memories during that process. 

And at this moment I must say one thing. The near-death experience is not the same thing as death. Nobody came from death to tell people what is happening in that place. And we know that there are many things in the brain that are unknown to us. 

Image and other sources: 

.https://scitechdaily.com/similar-to-a-near-death-experience-new-effects-of-psychedelics-discovered/

https://technol0gyandpolitics.wordpress.com/2022/09/12/the-near-the-death-experiences-are-not-death-experiences/

Riken researchers controlled a three-qubit system. And that thing can be a revolution for AI research.

The breakthrough in quantum systems. Riken researchers controlled a three-qubit system in a silicon-based quantum computer. And they also made the error correction for that system. So why is this a fundamental thing? First thing is that the silicon-based quantum system is the thing that is needed, for the small-size quantum computer that operates at room temperature possible. 

There is the possibility to create hybrid systems that use magnets and high pressure to make the superconductor. That hybrid system can operate at room temperature. In that case, the high-power magnetic field will stabilize the wire and remove oscillation away from it. 

The AI uses the models of the brain for being effective. 

Do you know why we have three parts in our brains? The cerebrum has two parts or sections. And cerebellum is the part of the brain system. The odd number of data handling units guarantees that the system will not stuck. 

The AI model system will be stuck if there is an even quantity of data handling units. In that case, two parts of the system can make a different decisions. And if there is even quantity of the units that cause a fight. So in the brain cerebellum is required to choose the better solution if the sections of the cerebrum will get a different solution. 

The working artificial intelligence requires the system must have an odd number of data handling units. That thing denies the stuck of the system. 

But the ability to control the three-qubit system makes also possible to create the next-generation artificial intelligence. In that case, the system uses three qubits for emulating the human brain. The system will multiply data into three similar copies. And then that data will send through those qubits.

The reason why that quantum brain has three lines or qubits is simple. The use of three qubits denies the ability where the votes are tied if the system gets different solutions. Because there is an odd number of qubits. That means another possibility always has superior. 

In the case that. There is even a quantity of qubits that thing causes that system will halt. In that case, the system cannot make decisions. The odd number of qubits guarantees that the system will never halt because it cannot make decisions. Artificial intelligence requires a model where another side always gets superior. 

https://scitechdaily.com/quantum-breakthrough-researchers-demonstrate-full-control-of-a-three-qubit-system/

https://everyactioncausesthereaction.wordpress.com/2022/09/10/riken-researchers-controlled-a-three-qubit-system-and-that-thing-can-be-a-revolution-for-ai-research/

Traffic noise can decrease cognitive abilities.

Sleeping problems are opening the road for finding out why people see dreams. So many researchers highlight the REM periods of sleep. But also the other periods of sleep have a purpose. Deep sleep periods are the most mysterious things in sleep. 

Most of the sleep is deep sleep or delta-sleep. And things that happened during those periods are a mystery. And there is the possibility that a person sees dreams during those periods. But the REM period just before awakening wipes those things out of the memory. 

But the fact is that REM (Rapid Eye Movements)  sleep is only a short period of sleep. And also, deep sleep periods are important things for the quality of sleep. The thing is that deep sleep period are important so that brains can rest. 

During those periods brains are loading their neurotransmitters. So maybe the other purpose of the REM period is to test the neural tracks for the next day. And maybe another reason for the REM period is that it's the indicator that brains realize the level of sleep. 

Some researchers believe that the purpose of the REM period is to wipe out things that a person saw during deep sleep periods. But there might be many purposes for REM sleep. And one of them might be to prepare the person for the next day. 

Even low-level traffic noise can decrease cognitive abilities. The fact is that the traffic noise will keep the person awake.  And it can decrease the level of sleep. And that causes the quality of sleep decreases. The increasing level of the REM periods is causing a situation where some neurotransmitters get lower and that causes that in the morning person will be tired. Good and effective sleep also requires so-called deep sleep periods because brains are loading their neurotransmitters during deep-sleep periods. 

The brains will load neurotransmitters during those periods. And the purpose of REM sleep could be to test the neural tracks. Maybe one of the purposes of REM sleep is to prepare people for the next day. There are also some psychological purposes for that thing that we call sleep. In some models during sleep person will analyze the things that are too hard to handle when a person is awake. 

But the REM sleep along with its dreams is a so-called light dream. The purpose of a light dream is when something is felt threatening.  If a person is in the REM period, the person can wake up very fast. So maybe the purpose of REM sleep is to act as a mark that the level of sleep is at a certain level, where fast waking and acts just after that is possible. 

The traffic noise would make brains feel that person is under some kind of threat. And that keeps the sleeper almost awake. The traffic noise can mean that the car is driving over that sleeper. Especially when traffic noise suddenly starts after midnight brains have problems getting back to sleep. 

When a person sleeps, the brain cannot make difference between real- and hypothetical threats. There are no virtual threats in nature. So traffic noise is more harmful to sleep quality than it should. And even low noise traffic can cause the quality of sleep decreases. That thing causes problems with cognitive actions. 

When a person is tired that thing affects the ability to concentrate and think. The traffic noise is the mark of hypothetical threats as I wrote earlier. And the problem with human brains is that they are created to make a person survive in dark forests where all threats are real. That's why human brains are taking all things seriously. 

https://scitechdaily.com/bad-things-happen-after-dark-scientists-call-for-new-research-on-how-our-brains-change-when-were-awake-after-midnight/

https://scitechdaily.com/traffic-noise-can-slow-cognitive-development/

Image: https://scitechdaily.com/traffic-noise-can-slow-cognitive-development/

The new milestone in fusion research

Image 1) This illustration provided by the NIF (National Ignition Facility) at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory depicts a target pellet inside a hohlraum capsule with laser beams entering through openings on either end. The beams compress and heat the target. 

The lasers will rise the fusion capsule's temperature to a higher level than the sun's nucleus temperature is. The reason for that is the pressure of the stars must compensate. By rising temperature higher level than the nucleus of the sun is. 

(https://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/us-researchers-report-successful-fusion-reaction/6417024.html)

Fusion energy is coming.

Fusion energy is coming. And every day. Scientists are closer to breakthroughs for commercial fusion systems. They are assisted by artificial intelligence. Which is collecting data from those tests more accurately than ever before. Quantum computers can handle more variables than ever before. 

Machine learning makes it possible to adjust temperature and different types of electromagnetic radiation along with the most suitable materials for reactor constructions. Nanotechnology allows the creation of many new tools like miniature injection pipes that allow injecting the ions in the systems with very high accuracy. 

The main problem with fusion energy is that the reactor must give out more energy than it gets in the ignition process. Another problem is that the energy level in the fusion reactor is extremely high. The problem in the fusion reaction is that the pressure that helps to maintain reaction in the nucleus of the stars is very high. And on Earth, the pressure must compensate by increasing temperature in the fusion chamber. 

Then the fusion system requires a temperature that is higher than the temperature in the nucleus of the sun. The fusion system can use two plasma beams that have opposite polarity. And then the positive and negative plasma beams are impacted after they are shot through high-energy particle accelerators. The energy level at that point can increase by using laser beams. 

The electromagnetic pulling effect can make it easy to aim the plasma beams. There are two major types of fusion reactors. For regular energy production. The donut-shaped "Tokamak" accelerators are more suitable. The plasma orbits in the donut-shaped accelerator. And magnetic fields keep that plasma ring flowing away from the reactor's core. The magnets are pressing the plasma ring. And it is also targeted by using lasers. 

The problem with "Tokamak" is that system must use the monopolar plasma. The reason for that is the magnetic press would not work if there is a plus and minus mark ions in the same chambers. The opposite polar ions would be suitable for increasing the friction in the plasma ring. 

Another type of reactor is the ball- and tube-shaped reactor. The NIF (National Ignition Facility) uses a ball-shaped system for simulating the power of the hydrogen bombs. In those systems, in the middle of the reactor will put the lithium bite. And then it will be shot with laser rays. The power of the ignition system is extremely high. And it will make the lithium atoms melt together.  

The ball-shaped systems can also be very powerful and there is the possibility that in the middle of the chamber will flow the ion cloud. Then the rotating magnets and magnetic press along with lasers and microwaves will turn the temperature of the plasma ball to extreme heat. The rotating magnets cause internal friction. That is increasing the temperature. 

Image 2) Artist's impression of Bussard ramjet

The fusion rocket and weapon solutions

Fusion engines can use in rockets. There are many types of theoretical fusion engines for rockets. And the problem with them all is that they require extremely high ignition power. In conventional systems, the fusion engine gives only thrust. And the other energy supply will get from the fission reactor. The most awesome theoretical fusion system is the Bussard ramjet. 

The system uses a magnetic field for pulling ions through the spacecraft. So there is a channel in the system where the magnets will press the ion flow and behind the system, the lasers will ignite fusion in the plasma. That means the artificial sun will push the spacecraft forward. That fusion could be self-sustain. Or it can get auxiliary energy from a fission reactor. 

The tube-shaped reactor is one of the most interesting versions for lightweight systems. The tube-shaped fusion reactors can be connected with particle accelerators that shoot their two opposite polar ion beams in the chamber. That ion flow will impact together. And that impact helps to ignite fusion. The tube-shaped system makes it possible to create more lightweight fusion systems than ever before. 

Hydrogen bombs or thermonuclear weapons are small fusion devices. The uncontrolled fusion causes huge detonation. There is made a research on how to replace the fission bomb that gives energy for begin fusion by using the lasers. Theoretically, the small fusion device can be the lithium chamber where is shot high-power laser rays. 

That is causing detonation. That thing makes fusion weapons cheaper. But there is the possibility to use the particle accelerators for shooting plus and minus ions together. And that thing can use as the "fusion cannon bomb". 

The fact is that those tube-shaped "fusion cannons" can be used as the base for the new type of terrifying fusion weapons. Those new types of fusion bombs would not require a fission stage. The detonation of the fusion system happens by using the lasers. 

The idea of some of that so-called free-ion nuclear weapons or "artificial suns" is that the high-power ion beams that have different polarities will shoot together. That system can use the chamber or it can use the ion beams. 

The magnetic pulling force will make those ions come together. And that thing can cause the detonation. In some visions, two different polar ion clouds. Will release over the target area. And then the system will shoot those ions with laser rays that form artificial sun over the area. 

https://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/us-researchers-report-successful-fusion-reaction/6417024.html

https://i4is.org/interstellar-ramjets/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bussard_ramjet

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Ignition_Facility

Image 1) https://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/us-researchers-report-successful-fusion-reaction/6417024.html

Image 2) https://i4is.org/interstellar-ramjets/

 https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

Should we trust science?

   

 Should we trust science?

We must determine things what we mean about "trust science"? The fact is that the purpose of science is to search and observe things and find answers to many questions. 

In the beginning, we must separate science and scientist. The scientist is the person who is making science. So scientists can tell lies. And also greatest scientists sometimes make mistakes. 

When we think about things like the universe. Our knowledge of that thing is increasing. But then we are facing one thing. We want to know more and more about that thing. We are part of the universe. 

And when we can think that our knowledge is like the universe itself. Limits of our knowledge and confirmed knowledge expand. And we find new connections between the particles. In the same way, we can find new connections between other things. 

The exosolar systems, exoplanets, and other kinds of things were pure science fiction. Today we know that there are many other solar systems than our own. 

In the past, we believed that the species are alone. Today we know that the species are cooperating. As an example, some trees call ants to protect them against aphids. But in sociology is the thing called conspiracy theory. 

Sometimes conspiracy theories are told in purpose for shaking the trust of authorities. Sometimes we might say that things like the murder of John Fitzgerald Kennedy are a conspiracy. Sometimes is also said that if the murder of the JFK is open because there are no convicted persons in that case. There were too many chefs in that soap. And great publicity made it impossible to give the solution for that case. 

Two commissions researched that case.

The Warren Commission was set by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1963, just after the Kennedy murder. That commission is the major source for the people who are believing that Oswald shot President and operated alone. The problem with that commission was that it acted very soon after the shot of JFK. 

The chairman of the commission was the judge, Earl Warren. The thing that caused criticism was that the commission was not the research was there somebody behind Lee Harvey Oswald. And another thing was that the authorities like the FBI didn't have any kind of room to operate. So Lyndon B. Johnson set the Warren Commission too soon. And its work was disturbed by the media. (Wikipedia/Warren Commission)

The other commission: the United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) was supported the Warren Commission report. But they could not exclude the possibility that some individual members of some paramilitary- or criminal organizations were involved in that crime. 

"The committee also stated that the conspiracy did not involve any organized crime group, anti-Castro group, nor the FBI, CIA, or Secret Service. The committee found that it could not exclude the possibility that individual members of the national syndicate of organized crime or anti-Castro Cubans were involved in a probable conspiracy to assassinate President Kennedy".  (Wikipedia/ United States House Select Committee on Assassination).

But today, we can only notice that nobody will ever get punishment. But things like papers full of black lines and censored details feed the conspiracy theories. So what have we learned about this case? The secrecy and hiding information are feeding the theories. 

Unusual equipment, such as the Mannlicher Carcano rifle, sparked debate. Was that rifle meant to be taken home after someone was shot? Was Oswald staging someone to blame for that incident? Or did someone carry that gun to Oswald's home? Officially that question remains open. 

There is an example of the story that probably meant releasing the military forces from their responsibility of nuclear weapon development.  When scientists created nuclear weapons. Some people told. That scientists alone carried the responsibility of the development of nuclear weapons. 

Department of Defense gave orders to develop nuclear weapons in all nuclear states. Head of the state and general staff have accepted those weapons and their development. The military command has been given the materials for testing those systems. And that means there were many other people than scientists who play a big role in those projects. 

In great public, the "conspiracy theory" is used in a very negative way of the view. In many stories, conspiracy theories are connected with mental disorders. The juridical term "conspiracy to commit the crime" means that a group of people is planning criminal activity. 

 But there is another thing in that kind of "theory". Many times the news is full of conspiracy theories. And sometimes the voice of that news is very stamping. 

People who believe those things are often marginalized as stupid. And that thing happens very often before things like massive cartels (illegal fixing the prices between companies) or some high-scale financial crimes uncover. 

But there is the thing that is called mass-effect that makes people answer as they believe in those theories. That mass effect is the social pressure that forces people give some answers. What they don't mean. Or they don't want to give. That thing is called virtual believing. 

Researching and confirming information is the best way to fight against falsified information. The thing is that the world is full of things that are not told to the public audience. Or those things are published in a very limited publication. And some high-level researchers are reading those articles. 

https://bigthink.com/questions/should-we-trust-science/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Select_Committee_on_Assassinations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Commission

https://writingsaboutmysteries.blogspot.com/

Why do we research history?

 Why do we research history?

We should learn from things that were made in past. 

Why do we research history? History is a series of things that happened in the past. Those things that are happened in history can use to make models for the future. Research of history is the thing. That purpose is to find the things that will happen in the future. The key question in the history research is to find answers for the questions like "what made something happen"? 

What mistakes were made in cases that are under the research? And what did people learn about those cases? Another thing is that that the purpose of the research of history is to find the answer to the question "what should we do in similar cases"? What went wrong? And what went right? 

When we are thinking about questions like "which side had better generals Confederate or Union side in the United States civil war?". We must realize that the thing that fights is the entirety. Even the best generals in the world cannot win battles alone. In those cases also henchmen are playing roles. If the henchmen don't have the equipment, will, or skills to use weapons. The battle is lost. 

When we are thinking questions "what should we do" in those cases when something has happened. We must remember that when we are looking at history. We might know all answers. We might think that the King of Sweden Charles XII of Sweden. Should not advance to Poltava, where he faced Peter the Great army. 

But the King of Sweden didn't have the same knowledge that we have today. Today we can go to the library and find history books that are telling about the history of Sweden. And there are all answers. But Charles XII acted by using the information that he had. And that was the mistake. 

When we are looking at history we are easy to justify people. Those people made mistakes. And we would be different. And at this point, I must say one thing. In history, people acted by using the information that they had. They lived in different types of society. When they made their decisions they cannot look at results from the library. 

Today history repeats itself. We are thinking that joining the common currency of the European Union Euro was a mistake. The fact is that the Euro planned to be the virtual currency. Which purpose was to help to compile prices. But it turned to real currency. When countries joined the Euro nobody criticized that thing. There was the biggest boom in the history of Europe.

And people wanted to join that boom. But they forgot that even the biggest and strongest economies will face bear markets. So when the bear markets begin that kind of thing will cause things like bankruptcies and unemployment. What do we learn about Euro? When we are middle of the booms we can join everything. But when the boom is over. We still are in the system. 

We can of course, always step out from Euro. That kind of signal would please Russian leaders very much. When we joined Euro nobody said anything against that decision. But now Euro is facing criticism. And of course, we are independent nations who can always start to think about their national interest. We all can step out from Euro immediately, and maybe we are facing a new bull market. But then sooner or later our economy will face a bear market. 

And in that case, we can search for friends. Of course, we can always let those loans that are taken from the EU without paying and then ask for more loans. We have the right to do that thing. But when we are asking for money. There should be somebody willing to offer that money to us. The thing is that when we are looking at history the best wisdom is the hindsight is the best wisdom. 

Now, today we can say wisely. We should not ever join Euro. We made a big mistake wise men say. But we always make mistakes. Only people who are not making anything are not making mistakes. And that is the fact. When we joined Euro nobody saw anything negative about that thing. Or those people said nothing against that thing. Where were the wise men when those political leaders made that decision?

Why did they keep their mouth shut? Why didn't they offer their advice when the nation joined Euro? Now the media is full of advisors who are telling that the Euro was the mistake? 

Today we can say that Euro should remain as the virtual currency. But people made the decision. By using information that was in use at that time. It's too late to cry. We are in Euro and that's it. And then we can make new decisions. 

Technology is advancing. And that brings new challenges and opportunities. 

Sometimes I have thought about what kind of decisions the King of Sweden Charles XII would make if that person had recon satellites? What if he would get confirmed information of his enemies?

At this point, I must say that we should not stare at history too much. Things like artificial intelligence are making it possible to return Euro to virtual currency or even delete that currency. The AI-based solutions offer possible to show the prices in multiple currencies. The modern internet has more capacity than some year 2000 version. And that thing makes it possible to make many things that were impossible in the year 1999. 

And if somebody is willing to pay with some other currency there is enough to put the bank card in the payment system. Then the system would change the price to the currency. That is in use in the country where the bank card is offered. The that we are living in the new era of history. And that era is full of threats and possibilities. Things like quantum computers would revolutionize data processing. And that is the thing that we should benefit more from in our life. Data processing and the internet are tools that began the revolution in the world. And that revolution continues today.

But when we are making decisions we should understand that they all have effects. We cannot make decisions undone. The decisions are made by using data. That was in use at that time.  And that's it. We cannot retake time and make them undone. But maybe we can learn something from history. And maybe, we should listen to more people when we are making some decisions in tomorrow world. And then we must say that somebody will pay the price. When some person gets something. That affects everything. 

https://thebrightchronicle.blogspot.com/

China has increased its ECM power near its borders.

  

 China has increased its ECM power near its borders.

China increased its ECM (Electronic Counter-Measure) systems at artificial islands near its borders. The fixed countermeasure stations can deny the use of most modern US weapons. But the more interesting things are details that the Chinese are kept away from people. China has developed many new weapon systems. And there is almost certainly the DEW (Directed Energy Weapons). 

The problem is that those EM stations are on-ground stations. And that means. There could be even a megawatt-class microwave or radio system in those stations. The powerful radio waves can cause the synthetic EMP-pulse that destroys the computers. 

The countermeasure stations can cut the communication links that are integrated ground, sea, and airborne troops in one entirety. Those communication links are playing a vital role in communication between satellites and US systems. If the communication between troops is not working the main tactics of the US are useless. 

That thing can cause at least problems for troops. But another thing is that. The real power of those systems depends on the power and type of those countermeasure systems. The high-power microwave and radio systems can even kill people if they are targeting their radiation to a certain point. Even the low-power electric arcs are dangerous. But high-power militarized systems are even worse.

Crossing high-power radiowaves can form destructive electric arcs which temperature is high enough to melt steel. If the system uses turning transmitting antennas. The crew can aim the electric arc exactly where operators want. 

And those systems are destructive also for other things than some computers. Electric arcs are easy to create by using crossing radio waves. Can start the fire, detonate ammunition and burn fuel storage. 

The high-power electric arc simply detonates targets by causing heat expansions. Thre is planned to use crossing radio waves as weapons. And if those radio waves are hitting humans that causes the shockwave in the body. The internal burn injuries might not be seen outside and they can also be deadly. But the powerful electric arc simply detonates the victim. 

The gound-based counter-measure systems can be very powerful. The power of those radio-and microwave systems can be even megawatts. And that means they can melt metals. This type of powerful electromagnetic system can destroy targets. The microwaves are hitting living cells can also cause the situation that liquids in cells are starting to vaporize. 

https://networkedinternet.blogspot.com/

Where are aliens hiding?

 Where are aliens hiding?

Above: fictional space cruiser from "Star Wars" movie

Are there other technical advanced civilizations near us?

Are there other technical advanced civilizations near us? That is one of the biggest questions we ever faced. There are no official contacts with aliens and the rest are purely hypothetical thoughts and models. 

But there is the possibility that SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) will make contact tomorrow. Or maybe it takes thousands of years for taking confirmed signals from the other civilizations. 

Tools like the James Webb telescope and quantum computers are the most powerful tools ever been used for that kind of mission. The James Webb telescope can find the Earth-size planets orbiting other stars. But the main role in the SETI program plays radio telescopes. The requirement for making contact is that also aliens are using similar technology with us. 

We don't even know if the aliens have radio telescopes? And what frequencies they are listening to. Getting that information requires contact with aliens. And without that information is very hard to make contact. There are no confirmed alien signals so everything we write and talk about intelligent alien civilizations is purely hypothetical and theoretical discussions. 

What if advanced civilizations use unmanned automatic operating probes. Which are controlled by very advanced AI for interstellar missions? 

The answer is that nobody knows. Officially there is no evidence of intelligent alien civilizations. But there are many forms of how those civilizations can exist near us. One of the possibilities is that there could be probes that other civilizations sent. But this is only a theory or theoretical model of how to travel to stars. At first, there would send robots to find out suitable locations. 

The thing is that if aliens use robots that are controlled by artificial intelligence, they must not worry about flight times and other kinds of problems. The journey between stars could take even millenniums. 

And those probes would send data to their senders. That thing requires technology that makes craft able to fix itself. The problem is that the sender can forget those probes if there is some kind of internal problem like the war on their planet. 

Why the Wow!-signal(captured, August 15, 1977) and BLC-1 (captured, December 18, 2019) signals are unique?

The origin of BLC-1 (Breakthrough Listen Candidate 1) Remains a mystery. Things like broken computers are seeming good, but the problem is why those things that are causing that kind of things are not happening before. 

Same way, why have some high-energetic particle impacts with radio waves from Proxima Centauri haven't cause that kind of signal before? Or if the source of those signals is alien transmitting, why do those transmissions not repeat? The same thing that thing supports both theories. Why do those signals BLC-1 and Wow! are unique? 

Both natural and alien source theories can explain that thing. But there is some extraordinary in the structures of comets. That is mentioned as the source of the Wow!-signal from 1977. If the comets are the source of that signal there is the possibility that there was some kind of unique layer in those comets. 

Technical advances aren't forming without intelligence and motivation. 

The creature can be very intelligent. But that thing doesn't mean that it makes technical equipment. For creating new technical equipment. Intelligence requires motivation, tools, and knowledge on how to make something.

If that intelligence doesn't have the needed information the intelligence can ask that thing from something. or it can start to search answers for testing ad study the suitable solutions for making a new car or interstellar spacecraft. 

Three major things are dominating the R&D (research and development processes. 

1) Level of intelligence

2) Information that intelligence uses for the project. This part includes skills and systems what the project requires. 

3) And motivation. There must be time and other resources for completing the project. 

The thing is that intelligence is not the same thing with technical advances. Intelligence makes technical advances possible. But research and development (R&D) don't happen without motivation. 

The thing is that the lack of information means that there is a lack of stimulus. And creature requires stimulus for creating new solutions. Outcoming information creates motivation for creating new technology. 

If there is no motivation or will to get knowledge about something. When we think of that intelligence and advances are the same things. 

We are wrong about that thing. Intelligence makes it possible to create technical advances. But that requires motivation and will to get knowledge of how to make technical solutions. In the case that we want to make contact with civilization by using radio telescopes. That civilization must also have radio telescopes. 

When we write about possibilities to communicate with other civilizations we should rather say. "Communicate with other technical advanced civilizations". That communication requires that the civilization has similar communication equipment with us. And the thing is that even if that hypothetical civilization has the radio communication equipment. 

That thing doesn't mean the hypothetical civilization uses similar radio telescopes that we use. The thing is that without contact we cannot know how to communicate with aliens. And without that knowledge, we cannot make contact. There are a couple of promising signals and the only problem is that they are not repeating. The same thing that makes them promising makes them also uncertain. 

If the source of those signals would be a star these signals like Wow! and the 2019 signal from Proxima Centauri known as BLC-1 (Breakthrough Listen Candidate 1)would be a star they should be repeating. But because those signals were unique. That thing also supports the origin of those signals in chemical or electrochemical reactions. But it's also evidence against "natural source". The question is why that reaction happens only once?

The source of BLC-1 has been explained as the plasma impact or some other type of high-energetic particle impact that could disturb radio signals. But again the question is why that signal ever happened again? And why have similar things are not seen before? There is given also an exploration that a broken computer can give that signal. But the question is why that kind of effect has not been seen before?

The solar system itself is inhabited. But the thing is that there is the possibility that some kind of probe could send that signal. But is the position of the probe at Proxima Centauri. Or is it manmade and closer than we think? The fact is that nobody knows what caused that signal that was received in Parkes observatory on 18 December 2019. 

If the source of the Wow!-signal was in comets why did those comets send those signals only once? Was there some unique layer of material that sent that 72 seconds radio transmission to the Big Ear telescope in Ohio sate university? 

That thing means that their source could be some kind of reaction in AREA-51 or some other research plant. And they were formed. When some exotic materials are stressed. By using electromagnetic radiation. If aliens send those signals why they don't repeat them? So the source of those signals is unknown. 

Maybe in the case of the Wow! signal it was some kind of comet, but why do other comets not make similar effects. And why do those comets send that kind of signal only once? That is the thing why the source of those strange signals is unknown. 

https://earthsky.org/space/wow-signal-explained-comets-antonio-paris/

https://astronomy.com/news/2020/09/the-wow-signal-an-alien-missed-connection

https://www.livescience.com/alien-signal-blc1-earth-origin

https://www.sciencealert.com/exciting-mystery-space-technosignals-were-indeed-produced-by-sentient-life-us

https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-news/the-true-nature-of-the-candidate-et-signal-from-proxima-centauri/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLC1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_signal

Researchers created chewing gum which protein will trap COVID-19.

   

 Researchers created chewing gum which protein will trap COVID-19.

This kind of innovation is very nice and interesting. The same technology can use to create medicines against other viruses. So that thing offers very good protection against viruses if their core proteins or proteins that transfer their genomes to cells are known. 

This kind of thing can be the golden horn for the medical industry that tries to create medicines against viruses that are more lethal than COVID-19. There is also the possibility that researchers will increase vaccines in the structure of chewing gum. The thing is that vaccination is the most effective way to protect against viruses. 

Of course, there are always cases that viruses are passing the immune defense. Or in some other cases, the vaccine causes blood clots. Sometimes the thing that causes the blood clots is the physical exercise that starts too soon. But the thing is that the immune system is the most effective way to fight against those viruses. 

Those antiviral medicals are still at the research level.  Creating medicals against viruses is quite a new thing. 

Every single virus needs its special antivirus medicals. And the fact is that those medicals can cause complications. And getting viruses is always a bigger chance to get a deadly or bad virus infection than hospitalization because of the complications of the vaccines. 

But then we are facing one very interesting part of the virus research. Sometimes researchers are increasing the virus's ability to infect cells. Or turn dangerous viruses more dangerous. And that technology is causing critics. The vaccine and medical research need the viruses that can produce proteins that are trapping or destroying the genetic material of the viruses. 

Some of the antiviral medicals are produced biologically. That means the cell cultures are infected with the virus. And then the immune cells are starting to create antibodies against those viruses. After that those antibodies can collect. Or the immune cells can be cloned. Sometimes in those processes is used genetically engineered viruses. That are producing different viruses. 

This thing causes thought that. Could the "Omicron" variant the virus that is escaped from the laboratory? If there are tested new vaccines. There is the possibility that some viruses are accidentally infected personnel that is working. 

So that means the COVID-19 or some of its variants accidentally released in vaccine research. The problem with genetically engineered viruses is that researchers can use the same technology in biological weapon research. 

https://scitechdaily.com/chewing-gum-developed-that-could-reduce-covid-transmission-laced-with-protein-that-traps-the-sars-cov-2-virus/

https://interestandinnovation.blogspot.com/

Tunguska explosion on June 30, 1908

The image I: The nuclear test at Pacific

The structure of the meteorite that caused the Tunguska detonation is a mystery. There is the possibility that the asteroid was the bite of methane ice under the dust. And that thing makes it possible that the explosion happened in the air. The fact is that nobody can prove that they saw an object flying in the air. Many people saw that explosion. But nobody has proven to see that object when it was flying. I use the term "object" for meaning the meteorite that caused the explosion. 

The fact is that the shape or form of the meteorite is a mystery. The Soviet science academy started the research of that case in 1927. And there were almost 20 years of that case. So the memories of people were not clear. And maybe some of the "witnesses" played mad because they were afraid Soviet secret police. Between the explosion and the start of research was a long time. 

 Leonid Alekseyevich Kulik (1882-1942) 

Image II

The first research of the Tunguska case began in 1921. And the notes of the first, 1921 exploration lost. The problem was the Russian civil war. So the conditions in the Soviet Union stabilized in 1923 when the civil war was over. And that's why I will claim that the first real investigations were possible in 1927. Russian mineralogist Leonid Kulik (1882-1942) was the leader of all explorations in that area.  In the years 1921, 1927, and 1937. 

There was the First World War, the Russian revolution, and the civil war. That means the research team had a very small chance to solve that mystery. When the story of the changing trajectory of the object is told the researchers might just forget to ask did the self seen that thing or was it some cousin? 

And another thing is that they probably didn't ask what kind of trajectories that person saw? Did the object come to the ground at 90 degrees angle? Or was it gently and what was the position of the observer? Was that person under the trajectory? Or did that person standing at the side of the trajectory? Did that object leave smoke trails or was it like some kind of laser ray? And what color was that trail? Was it black that might be the sign of carbon meteorite that vaporizing in the atmosphere? 

Image III: The ground zero of Tunguska

If the antimatter arrived in the atmosphere that should cause the detonation in the upper atmosphere. So if the reason for the explosion was antimatter it should be inside some kind of magnetic bite. The magnetic core could cover the antimatter bite so long that it would be near the ground or at least in a deep atmosphere before the explosion happens. 

Or was there the meteorite at all? Could some kind of radiation like XRB or GRB (X- or gamma-ray burst) that the spin of electrons will turn opposite in the atmosphere. In that theory, the antimatter was formed spontaneously by the radiation impact deep in the atmosphere. So that would also explain why there is no mark of meteorite left. 

Image IV: Famous image of fallen trees in Tunguska

There are strange stories about that case. One of them was that the object that flew in the air turned its direction. But there is no evidence that the persons who told that story didn't even be there. The person who told that story didn't describe the size of the detonated object. 

The mystery is why there is no impact crater? The meteorite that exploded in the air is the answer. But the thing that caused the worries is that nobody saw anything special before that explosion happened. That means that the object that caused the detonation was quite small. So could the reason for the Tunguska detonation be the antimatter?

Image V: The marks of the explosion are still visible

The mystery of Tunguska is why the meteorite or object that dropped from the space detonated on air? The detonation didn't leave any kind of craters behind it. But the "ground zero" of that impact is still visible. Also, the fallen trees are seen on the ground. And the reason why no trees are growing on ground zero and trees are remaining so well is that the particle that detonated on air caused intense heat.

The pressure wave caused the vacuum in that area. And that thing caused that fire itself to end. Because trees didn't start to burn. That explains why there is no carbonized wood or marks of fire. 

Also, powerful wind denied that the fire had not started to burn in the area near the explosion. The vacuum, along with rising air, pulled radon up from the ground caused a small rising of the radioactivity in that area. 

How antimatter could pass the atmosphere? If the ionized antimatter particles are in the bubble of magnesite meteorite. That thing makes the situation possible that the antimatter can travel deep inside the atmosphere. When the meteorite falls through the atmosphere it will melt, and then the antimatter particles touching the air. The result is an explosion.

There is the possibility that if the extremely thin gold layer is in the bubble of the small asteroid. The cosmic radiation can cause that antimatter is forming inside those asteroids. And even a small-size asteroid can cause large destruction. 

Sometimes is introduced that the Tunguska explosion was the UFO. The thing is that there is no evidence about that thing because the meteorite vaporized in the explosion. So officially, the reason for the Tunguska explosion was the object that came from space and detonated in the atmosphere. 

https://earthsky.org/space/what-is-the-tunguska-explosion/

https://ksc.krasn.ru/en/news/micro_particles_of_the_tunguska_meteorite/

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2013.13163

http://scihi.org/leonid-kulik-tunguska-event/

Image I: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/Operation_Castle_-_Yankee.jpg

Image II:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Kulik

Image III:https://osr.org/blog/news/tunguska-asteroid-event-of-1908/

Image IV:https://media.sciencephoto.com/e6/70/00/80/e6700080-800px-wm.jpg

Image V:https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna5686713

Could the Tunguska explosion cause because by human activity? Did someone accidentally make the antimatter bomb?

I hope that I'm wrong. But in some creepy visions, the Tunguska explosion was the result of human activity. There is the possibility to make the antimatter by using lightning. The system would be the capacitor like the Leyden jar that is on the tall mast. 

Then the electricity will conduct to the extremely thin gold layer. The electricity will collect to the  Leyden jar and then sooner or later it will strike to the gold. 

If the power of the electricity is high enough that thing causes that the electrons turn to antimatter. The system can be the lightning collector and the small gold bite. The Leyden jar stores the electricity in electrolytic liquid. Then the antenna must target the gold plate. And the detonation would be impressive. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leyden_jar

https://writingsaboutmysteries.blogspot.com/

The "Skinwalker ranch" part II (Is this place the robot test site?)

Steam horse from 19th century
(Picture I)

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Could somebody force the owners of that famous ranch leaving the area by using electric arcs and another kind of stuff? And did they make that thing for covering something, what people should not see? When we are thinking about the poltergeist, what was the description in the film, what is below the text, we must see, that those phenomena are very easy to make by using electric arcs, fireworks, and loudspeakers. The name of the ranch feels like something psychological operation.


So were Shermans the victims of "Project Garnet". The pseudo-UFO-project, what government uses to turn the attention from otherwise, when it wants to hide something, and in that project is made the high power electric systems, holographic equipment, airships, and other things, what are made look like UFO:s. But as we might see, there is something very interesting in the films, what is made by that case. The film is not made by me, and I don't own copyrights, but there are a couple of interesting parts.


In the 2:02 is the art, what seems very interesting, and the left figure might seem like the horse, what is hit by the rocket. And the left side of thing looks like a horse, what has some kind of hilts. Or maybe they are the fuel tanks for some kind of mechanical horse. We know that in 19th. century was made the mechanic humans, and horses, what were called as "automaton". So could that kind of technology tested in that ranch? The picture in 2:06 seems like painted while LSD trip, and this is very interesting. And in my mind came one very interesting thought, could that ranch be used for testing undercover intelligence or military surveillance robots?

The intelligence and military are , of course, interesting many kinds of robots, and some robots, what could be developed for surveillance might seem innocent, and probably intelligence would be tested also artificial cows, what could be equipped with composts, what creates the methane for the fuel cells of that device. I know this feels futuristic, but the robot, what could look for fuel from nature would be hard to detect and own more operational time, than robots what tank must refill. Or if the robot can drink the hydrocarbons like an animal, would that help to keep those things secret.

Even in 19th. century the automatons or robots, as we call those things today were seriously investigated and tested, but the technology was not enough high level for making those early robots suitable for the everyday purpose. But as we know the modern technology allows us to make even artificial cows, what eats the real food like, and that biomass can be transformed as an alcohol or methane in the anaerobic reactor, and use in fuel cells, what gives power for that kind of robots. Those robot animals can be equipped with machine guns and anti-tank weapons, and if we want to be nasty, those artificial cows can also be equipped with nuclear explosives. That kind of solutions is interesting many organizations and offices in the world of intelligence and military.

The film of "Skinwalker's ranch"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6b3hu_zNs2o

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_robots

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mephisto_(automaton)


Picture 1
https://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/science/steam-horse.jpeg

Thoughts about investigations and clouds

Picture I

https://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/


Kimmo Huosionmaa


This is only the imagination but on the top of the text is the picture of three cloud towers (Picture I), what brings in my mind the Eagle nebula, where is also three towers. I know that there are people, who start to think that I'm crazy, but there is the very distant similarity between the shapes of those three clouds and the interplanetary fog in the Eagle nebula (Picture II). Of course, that seems the little bit too revolutionary way to see objects. But the clouds are incredible. And maybe somebody would see the similarity. And as I just wrote, use your imagination, and believe that the similarity is true.


They are so unique and same time so fantastic, that I must sometimes use my imagination, and see the things in those forms, what other people are not probably seeing. But the imagination is the good tool to make art and other illustrations. When the art investigators send their photos or drawings in the art magazines, they followed, what photograph was not liked, and then they looked at the feedback. If somebody gives bad feedback, don't worry be happy.

Picture II
Eagle nebula
(Image by NASA)

That told the graphologist, what was wrong with those pictures. If some feedback was very bad, they started to look for, what was the reason for that bad way to make contact. Was the reason that the person, who sent that feedback, wanted that the artist or graphologist would end the work, what this person does? And why that thing was wanted? What's the problem with photographs and art? Is there something in those photographs, what those people don't want to show to the world.

Picture III

If somebody misunderstands the third picture cloud as the UFO or aircraft in the dark evening, that would not be the reason for threat somebody. So don't be so serious with those misunderstandings. If some person makes lots of work, that means, that there is also misunderstandings. We all make mistakes. And if somebody doesn't do anything, that means that this person cannot make mistakes. We are all humans and we sometimes believe that some clouds are aircraft if we see those shapes in the dark evening, just before the sunset.

Silkhenge spiders and boosting the intelligence of animals

Picture I

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/silkhenge-spiders-and-boosting.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Above this text, you might see the mysterious creature, what is made for one spider. That structure is very abnormal, and it brought my mind the tests, where the animals are used for tests of Alzheimer-medicals or something like that. When I'm looking at this structure, I'd like to know what makes the spider make it? Have this spiders predisposes the stuff like Alzheimer medicals, what makes them behave strange way?


There are horror movies, where the sharks have eaten that kind of chemicals and became more intelligent as the normal sharks. I know that this might feel very utopistic, but there are rumors that in some tests to the ant's worms were injected extra neurons, what might make those ants more intelligent than normal ants. The reason, why those scientists chose ants for that process, is that they are not dangerous if there are only two or three individuals. If some spider would become extremely intelligent in compilation for the other individuals, that would cause the real-life "Arachnophobia" situation. But this is the only hypothesis. We would not know how the increase of the intelligence would influent those spiders behavior.


And those scientists tested the reactions of those ants, and their skills to survive against other ants. But in some cases, those tests might make by using spiders. This test might have consisted of the neuron transfer and Alzheimer medical predispose, what might make those spiders more intelligent than the spiders are. Is the spider or ant more intelligent than normal after the neuron transparent consists, if the transferred neuron can live in the new body and can it connect the nervous system?


If it could do that,  the animal would have more neurons than the normal individual. So, in this case, we are talking about very small animals like bugs and spiders, what have normally only about ten neurons. And increasing the number of those cells by two causes 20 percent increase the number of neurons. And if those neurons would work perfectly, they would become the part of that organism nervous system. That would make those things more intelligent than other individuals.


When we are thinking about this kind of tests and experiments, where the level of intelligence would be raised by giving the animal the Alzheimer medication or transferring the neurons, we must think that this kind of investigations is somehow dangerous. If the intelligence level of the sharks would increase, their behavior might be changed, and they can be more dangerous for swimmers than normal sharks. The increasing of intelligence means that behavior of the individual would change.


And when this kind of tests, where the bugs would be prone to that kind of medicals are made, should the maker of those tests be sure that those bugs would not get in nature. Bugs are very nice objects for that kind in investigations, where the team investigates the influence of medical on the nervous system because they are living only short time. Also, they are small sized, and if they are not poisonous, they are no threat to the human. The chemicals would not influence to genomes, and that's why the mutation would not transfer to next generation.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZgD7xKjaoQ

Picture I

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Unc-g9AHl2Y/sddefault.jpg#404_is_fine