About ethical problems of other planets colonization

Hardy's painting about conflict between civilizations
(Picture I)

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/about-ethical-problems-of-other-planets.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There is one big question about the colonization of another planet. That is " if we are ruined our own planet, could we continue that action in another world"? That is the very good philosophical question about ethical space exploration. When we are colonizing other planets, we must ask: "do we want to make that, because we have made our own environment unable to live. When we are thinking about the situation, where we are forced to leave our home planet, do we have ethical right to go to another planet and start to conquer it? Of course, the human being is number one in our own thoughts, and we are civilization, what have got right to be, but when we have polluted our own planet, can we go to another planet and start to act like some conquistadors?


And here we must ask the question, what if that would give the reason for other civilizations to attack us because they would see that we will destroy other planets? On the top of the text is artist David Hardy's painting about the war between civilizations, and that made me think that maybe this hypothetical situation is caused because that other citizens have been attacked by some other civilization, and that's why that civilization has been created tactic called "shoot first, ask then", what would cause terrible situation, when some probe would come to their solar system.


The reason for that might be attacked by other civilization. When we are talking about hyper civilizations, what life is not connected with planets, we must know that those civilizations might be very different than we are. In this scenario, some civilizations would leave their own solar system, and then suffuse to the entire galaxy. Those civilizations would live in giant spaceships, and they might travel around the universe for hunting materials for their ships.


And those civilizations might act like some doomsday horror film. They might send their machines to some solar system and explode all planets, by giving anti-matter injection to the center of them. After that gigantic factories would start to make new spaceships for those aliens. This kind of way to act would cause terrible situations if those civilizations would not notice other aliens. And this could be the big threat to mankind if we would travel to space in distant future. If those "grasshopper civilizations" would be true, they can cause the situation, where all visitors in some solar system would be attacked before any contact can even try to make.


In this scenario, I mean that all violent actions are learned, and when we are thinking about Spartan or some other nation militarism, that militarism is caused, because that society has been faced violent threat for its neighbors. And probably the behavior of the planet-size society would be the same. Here I must say that some isolated societies on Earth are also violent against intruders, and the reason for the violent behavior is that sometimes before those societies were attacked. And this makes us think, that if some civilization would face violent attack, it would act violent way to other civilizations.

Sources:

Picture I

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Fnq1D6Z94L0/maxresdefault.jpg

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/about-ethical-problems-of-other-planets.html

Twin investigations and ethical questions about it

http://marxjatalous.blogspot.fi/p/twin-investigations-and-ethical.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Assassinators are marginal persons, who live in the world, where nobody normal person would even want to live. I'm seen many movies and trailers in my life, and sometimes I have imagined, that could some of those stories be true. When we are talking about the stories, what are written by men like David Morrell, there might be organizations, what have skills and capacity to train those persons. And of course, there would be the very marginal thing about this kind of hypothetical cases. When we are thinking about movies, we would sometimes say, that "something happens only in the movies", but at the same time we forget, that also real world "bad guys" are watching television, and they would take influences from movies. And movies might give them ideas for their actions.


In this case, some organization would make the thing, what has been introduced in the movie "The mark of Cain". But I have thought that maybe some organization would use the situation, that they would take identical twins, who are crown separately, and train both of them working as an assassin. In this case, there would always be a person, who makes the alibi for another assassin. This kind of things bring my mind the things, what are not many times mentioned. The genetic investigations, what is consisted the thing called "twin investigations", where identically twins who are grown separately without knowledge of the twin brother or sister existence are very fascinating, but there is always thoughts and question about the reason, why some twins were separated just after their birth? Was the separation happened because of this kind of investigation?


The twin investigations were in the primary role when scientists found out, what skills and qualities are heritable and what is learned. And if this kind of investigations is wanted to be trusted, must the investigator use twins, who are grown separate places without knowledge or contact with another twin. Here we must another question about this kind of things. That goes like this: how the scientists tracked those twins? And how those twins were separated? Of course, modern genetic investigation makes possible to find out, are some persons actually twins, but then we must ask, how the tracking happened before modern genetic investigations? And the last thought about this thing is, did somebody separated those twins because of those investigations? If the reason for separation would be that kind of investigation, there would be very big moral problems with that kind of actions.


The twins are a fascinating object for scientists, who are working with genome investigation. But there would be many questions with about this kind of science. We can make artificial twins very easily by sharing the embryos in pieces, and this kind of thing allows us to make more advanced and more unethical investigations with that kind of thing. In some scenarios, another embryo would be freezing in liquid nitrogen to minus 189 Celsius. In this cryogenic condition, the molecular movements are ending. And those cells would not get older. And in this scenario, some scientific mastermind would make the experiment, that another twin would be live all the life, and then after this, another twin would be let to born. This allows the investigators make very good observations about the genetics and twins.


But when we are thinking about ethics and morale. How moralistic is to give another twin different kind of conditions than another twin? What if somebody misuses that investigation in the assassin training? Of course, the motivation for that kind of actions can be done by murdering another twin, and after that, another part of this hypothetical experiment was called to training, by saying " we found your twin brother, but he is dead by the terrorist attack". Those persons can play the role of the scientists, who are investigating genomes. And then they might claim that they found this lost brother from papers. This is the most difficult questions in science and technology.

http://marxjatalous.blogspot.fi/p/twin-investigations-and-ethical.html