Skip to main content

What is truth?



The image above portrays how the increase in accuracy changes our view of things. The images are from the left: the WISE telescope image, Spizer's image, and finally, the James Webb Telescope image. The last one of those infrared images shows stars as very clear and bright forms. 

The ultimate question: "what is truth" dominates discussions. The ultimate, and final truth is the thing that fascinates people from everyday life to courtrooms and the UN security council. Philosophers are written many times about that interesting and difficult question. The fact is that we cannot be objective, because our experiences, attitudes, and way to think are things. That polarizes information. The information that we share and what we use is always polarized. So we cannot be objective.

And that thing is the thing, what we must realize. The thing is that we all look for information that supports our attitudes and opinions. There are always things that were cornerstones in our life. And then the information changes. We see things differently, and in those cases, we might think that the cornerstones that dominated our discussions and opinions are gone forever. The new information can delete the information that has been the key element before. 

So we can accept that the new data and new information causes us that we must re-estimate things that have seemed so clear before. One of the things that we must re-estimate is the Standard Model of physics. Many things are shown that Standard Model is not perfect. When we are thinking about models of physics we must realize that every single model is qualified and useful, in a certain scale of entirety and a certain type of interactions. Newton's gravitational laws are suitable for planetary-scale objects. 

And the Standard Model is suitable for modeling interactions on the scale of the elementary particles. But when we are thinking about the accuracy of the Standard Model we must realize that even the smallest errors have a great effect on the scale of the subatomic particles. The problem with the Standard model is that it does not take into account interactions between particle and wave movement. And it doesn't take an account the interaction between wave motion. That means it is difficult to portray interaction between two wave movement series. 


https://thoughtsareinstruments.blogspot.com/2022/05/what-is-truth.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,