Politicians say that we made 20 times more for the environment than ever before. But is it enough?

But is it enough? When we remember the history of climate chancing. We have to know that thing. And nothing is done. Now we are facing the fact that the rains are making the cities flooding. And the question is that why we should pay for energy more than ever before? The answer is that we should make investments in green technology.

Or we must make investments in new flood dams. So we must take money for both investment targets. Or we might move away from the coastline and build a new city. The fact is that even if we will not do anything for renewing our energy source we should build protection against storms.

And otherwise, even if we can stop the carbon dioxide emission immediately the greenhouse effect continues. Removing carbon from the atmosphere takes time. A warming atmosphere increases the clouds. That means that the visible radiation of the Sun will decrease at sea level.

But the infrared radiation will cause the rise of the temperature in the atmosphere. And that means the temperature rises but the level of light is turning low.

Why we must be worried about that thing? When people are saying that energy costs too much. They should realize that floods and storms are turning more common than ever before.

The sewer systems in the cities cannot handle all flood water. And the problems with the new rains are that they are very strong. The warm weather along with the rain is the thing that is causing the strong microbe action. And in dark weather trees are not producing oxygen. They are producing carbon dioxide because they cannot make photosynthesis.

The fact is that 99,9 percent of scientists are confessed about climate change and that most of it are caused by humans. Almost 100% of the scientists believe that human activity is caused at least most of global warming.

But the question is why didn't react to that thing earlier? There are still people who have a "critical attitude" for those reports. But have those people ever looked outside? The fact is that climate change and global temperature rise can cause danger for the entire human civilization.

The problem is that when the global temperature rises the dark and warm times at the polar and subpolar areas are turning longer. That is the thing that causes methane emissions to the atmosphere when the bacteria is starting to melt dead vegetables.

Also, the bodies that are buried in the icy ground can deliver the micro-organisms to the water when they are melting. But maybe these kinds of things are some kind of panic.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-10104511/Climate-change-99-9-studies-agree-global-warming-mainly-caused-humans.html

https://scitechdaily.com/the-changing-climates-snowball-effect-can-new-technologies-help/

https://scitechdaily.com/consensus-revisited-do-scientists-still-believe-in-anthropogenic-human-caused-climate-change/

https://visionsoftheaiandfuture.blogspot.com/

Schrödinger's cat: and the limits of that idea.

"In quantum mechanics, Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment concerning quantum superposition". (Wikipedia, Schrödinger's cat). But the same thing can use as model for many other thought experiments. Sooner or later, or at least in the ultimate end of the universe, the Schrödinger's cat will turn into wave movement. The information that this cat involved exists but the cat does not exist in its material form. The information doesn't ever vanish. It just turns its shape. We are all trapped in the universe and time. The universe is the space that is entirety to us. There are no confirmed other universities. But the multiverse is a logical continuum for the expanding galactic megastructures. The problem with natural things is this. They are black and white. They exist or do not exist. Could there be something, that exists and not exists at the same time? Scrödinger's cat is thinking experiment about case their cat is not dead or not alive. But in this

The string theory offers a new way to calculate Pi.

"Scientists discovered a new series for pi through string theory research, echoing a 15th-century formula by Madhava. By combining Euler-Beta Functions and Feynman Diagrams, they modeled particle interactions efficiently. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, String Theory Unravels New Pi Formula: A Quantum Leap in Mathematics) People normally think that. The pi is the ratio of the circumference circle's circumference to the circle's diameter. The Pi is a mathematical constant 3.14159..., the endless decimal number. The Pi is interesting because developers can use that decimal number to make the encryption algorithms stronger. The idea is that the encryptions program hides the message's original ASCII numbers by multiplicating those numbers with some decimal number. Or the system can add some numbers to those ASCII numbers. "Aninda Sinha (left) and Arnab Saha (right). Credit: Manu Y" (ScitechDaily, String Theory Unravels New Pi Formula: A Quantum Le

There are always more than three actors in the real world.

"An international research team is advancing precision timekeeping by developing a nuclear clock using thorium isotopes and innovative laser methods, potentially transforming our understanding of physical constants and dark matter. (Artist’s concept.) Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Unveiling the Thorium Nuclear Clock and Its Time-Twisting Secrets) From Three-body problem... There are no pure three-body systems in nature. There are always more than three components in the system. For making real three-body systems we must separate those three bodies from the environment. Otherwise, there are stable effects. But nobody can predict some effects like distant supernova explosions or sun eruptions. And one of those things that affect all bodies is time. When radioactive materials decay. That affects the stability and symmetry of the object. Energy levels affect the existence of things like neutrons. The thorium atom clocks are next-generation tools for time measurement.

Cogito ergo sum. I think; therefore I am (René Descartes, French philosopher)

Search This Blog