Skip to main content

Why didn't we react to climate changes earlier?




Above: the advantage of the ozone hole in years 2004-2018


The purpose of futurology is to predict the things that people are facing tomorrow. The prediction makes it possible to make the model. And then the model makes it possible to create solutions for the challenges of tomorrow. The biggest challenge at this moment is climate chancing. But the question is, how we couldn't predict that thing? 

Or why we woke up for this threat too late? Now when we are trying to make solutions for stopping climate changing and the greenhouse effect have so short time to make something that we cannot make any real solutions. The greenhouse effect along with climate changing, global warming. And the loss of the ozone layer is seen 1980's when weather satellites show that there was an ozone hole near the South Pole. In those days there was no reaction to global warming. 

And after that researchers are made their reports and warned people every year nobody reacted. The thing is that if the papers that researchers are made are not read. Or if they are causing any reactions the fault is not the researchers. When we are read and written about climate changes those writings are stamped as climate anxiety. Then the floods were becoming more common and in a couple of last years, the winter did not exist. The question is, why everything must do at the last moment? 

If we would begin the reform of the energy production when the global temperature rising was confirmed, maybe we would have enough green energy capacity to replace the energy sources that are releasing carbon. But because we didn't react early enough, we are in the middle of a panic. The thing is that the storm floods in the 1960s were the thing that should alarm people. The fact is that climate chancing is the worst problem what the entire human race has ever faced before. 

Energy is the thing that keeps wheels rolling in western society. And energy production is the thing which causes the worst problem that the human race ever faced. The global temperature is rising because of carbon dioxide emissions. When the level of carbon dioxide is rising that causes the greenhouse effect. The first marks of global temperature rises were seen in the 1960s when the speed of wind in the northern storms rises. And since the 1980s the researchers tried to warn that the climate is changing but nobody listened. 

Or even if the global temperature rising seems minimal the ozone hole was noticed in the 1980s above Antarctica. And researchers noticed a similar phenomenon soon above the North Pole. 

The problem with global warming is the global temperature is not rising the same way in every area. The thing is that the global temperature rising is higher in the equatorial area. 

And another thing that is making the medium temperature lower than it is is the colder summers in the northern area. That means that the cold or cool weather continues long during summer. June is cold and then in July, the temperature rises to an extremely high level. Or in northern Europe, the weather is cool. But in Canada and the Northern USA, the entire summer is burning hot. Or otherwise in Europe and Sibir, the temperature is about 40 degrees and in southern areas of Earth, the temperature is -40 degrees Celcius. 


https://www.currentresults.com/Environment-Facts/changes-in-earth-temperature.php#:~:text=Mean%20global%20temperatures%20then%20stabilized%20at%20roughly%2014.0%C2%B0C,than%20the%20average%20temperature%20for%201951%20to%201980.


https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/world-of-change/Ozone#:~:text=But%20in%20the%20early%201980s%2C%20through%20a%20combination,came%20to%20be%20known%20as%20the%20ozone%20hole.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Sea_flood_of_1962


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storm_surge


https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,