The metal-binding proteins might be the origin of the first lifeforms on Earth.

Image: ScitechDaily/Profound Discovery on Origins of Life on Earth – Evolution of Metal-Binding Proteins

The metal-binding proteins might be the origin of the first lifeforms on Earth. And those molecules can give new power to nanotechnology and medicines.

The metal-binding proteins are the thing that can make the life of the first lifeforms possible. Those proteins give visions also for extraterrestrial lifeforms. And the protein that is a binding metal can play a key role in the new self-repairing nanostructures. If we think that the nanostructure is forming of carbon fiber. And then there would form the hole in the structure of the carbon chains there is the possibility that these kinds of proteins are playing a key role in self-repairment.

Those proteins install to the end of that carbon fibers. And then those proteins can make contact with liquid there are metals. After that to the carbon chain will conduct electricity. Or the magnetic field will use to put those carbon chains in position. Also, there is the possibility. That in the future. Those metal-binding proteins will use to remove poisonous metals from the water and ground.

The metal-binding proteins are also very dangerous if they are in the blood vessels. Those proteins can remove iron from the hemoglobin. And that thing causes death. So those proteins can use as the new type of chemical weapons. Or they can use as cytostatic. The idea is that those proteins will inject into veins that are transferring nutrients and oxygen to the tumors. That protein will deny the hemoglobin can transfer oxygen in that tumor. And it can destroy those cells.

Nanomachines can give a cure for cancer.

The origin of life on Earth will give ideas for modern nanomachines. When we are thinking possibility to produce the proteins that are binding metals by using biological components that things can use to give a cure for cancer. Genetically engineering can make it possible to create super immune cells that can destroy cancer cells that use nanotubes for sucking mitochondria from the immune cells.

One of the versions is to connect the genome that makes ricin vegetable to create ricin in the immune cells. Those "tuned" immune cells can be microchip-controlled. This system can turn the cancer cell's ability to steal mitochondria from immune cells against it. The idea is that the ricin molecule would be behind the pseudopods that the immune cell uses to detect the cancer cell. And when the nanotube is starting to pull the mitochondria in the cancer cell it would also get ricin molecules in it.

There is the possibility that the ricin-creating genomes would connect the mitochondria of the immune cell. Then there is the suppressor that denies the ricing creation. The cell can create a protein that cuts ricin when it's in the immune cell But when it will transfer to the cancer cell. That activates the creation of the ricin.

That thing causes the death of cancer cells. Another version is to use the microchip-controlled basils or amoeba and then that amoeba can shoot the ricin or pepsin in the cancer cell. Nanotechnology makes it possible to create nanomachines that are sucking the cell organs out of the cancer cells. Or they can simply cut the membrane of the cancer cells open.

https://scitechdaily.com/profound-discovery-on-origins-of-life-on-earth-evolution-of-metal-binding-proteins/

https://scitechdaily.com/cancer-cells-use-tiny-tentacles-to-suck-mitochondria-out-of-immune-cells/

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology. The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use. When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe. Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave. We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects. If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center. The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,

Cogito ergo sum. I think; therefore I am (René Descartes, French philosopher)

Search This Blog