Skip to main content

Are anyons the key to axions the hypothetical particles that can solve at least part of the mystery of dark matter?

 

Are anyons the key to axions the hypothetical particles that can solve at least part of the mystery of dark matter?


The idea of dark matter is that is like the imaginary version of the material. The thing is that the dark matter could be a higher or lower energetic version of the material. And the reason why we cannot see that material is that its elementary particles are a different size than the particles that we can see. 

So theoretically, if we want to create dark matter we must "just" increase or decrease the energy level of the quarks. And that thing adjusts the size of the quantum field of those particles. That should turn material invisible because it reflects the wavelength that is away from the visible electromagnetic spectrum. 

The anyons are 2D particles that might be key to the most interesting hypothetical particle in the world, the hypothetical axion. The 2D anyon particle is like the quantum field that is flattened because of some kind of impact by some other particle. The question is can any elementary particle smash to 2D form. And could that form be stable? The thing is that we are used to that everything in our 3D world being 3D. 

And that means anyons are not belonging to our world. The anyon is like the quantum field that is forming around something. And could that "something" be the thing that makes quarks come together and form the protons and neutrons?




Tachyon visualization. (Wikipedia, Tachyons). 

Could hypothetical axion be the particle that collects quarks around it? If that is true the axion forms material like protons and neutrons. 


The idea is that the hypothetical axion particle would be the tunnel that the hypothetical tachyon (faster than light particle) is leaving behind when that hypothetical particle visits the 3D universe. The idea is this. Normally, theoretical axions would detonate immediately. 

And send the radiation that is called dark energy. But if there are three quarks and the gluons are starting to travel between those quarks. That thing sends energy to the axion. But this thing cannot be proven until axions and tachyons are found. 

Is dark matter- or the source of dark energy the tachyons that are "visiting" in the 3D universe? That thing can maybe someday be proven right or wrong.

And why that strange anyon-particle could be the key to axions? Can we say that the material can have minus or plus dimensions that we cannot see? The thing is that there is suspicion that axions are the key to dark matter as I wrote at the beginning of the text. But the thing is that axions might be even the greater thing. They might be the key to another hypothetical particle called tachyons. I am written many times about those hypothetical faster-than-light particles. 

There is one little-known hypothesis about the tachyons. The idea is that sometimes the tachyon visits our universe. And that visit is the thing that is delivering the radiation that forms dark matter. The idea is in tachyon symmetry that should explain why no particle cannot cross the speed of light. The idea of tachyon symmetry is that when the particle is closing the speed of light it would pull the tachyon to it. The idea is that the tachyon creates superposition with that particle. 

And then the energy starts to flow to the lower energetic particle. The thing is that the superstring or bridge that connects the practice to tachyon is the reason why particles from our dimension cannot cross that cosmic speed limit. When they are coming near the speed of light tachyon pushes particles back. The reason for that would be the wave movement behind the tachyon. If the speed of the particle of the 3D universe will start to slow very fast. That thing causes that tachyon will slip into the three-dimensional universe. 

So the axion would be the energy tunnel that is forming when a hypothetical tachyon particle would slip into the 3D universe and then return its tachyon universe. In that case, the tachyon would form a small radiation pike that looks like bone. And then that thing can "vaporize" immediately.  But there is possible. What if there is outcoming energy that axion could turn stable. So if we think like this the axions are the thing that is pulling quarks around them and the axions would turn stable if they get energy from gluons. 

So could that thing be true? Proving that thing requires that the axions or tachyons would be proven. But the idea about axions as the base element of the material is fascinating. But as you see this writing is only the theoretical thinking about those things. 


https://astronomy.com/news/2020/12/physicists-prove-the-existence-of-two-dimensional-particles-called-anyons


https://www.livescience.com/imaginary-numbers-needed-to-describe-reality


https://phys.org/news/2021-10-strategy-non-conformist-particles-anyons.html


https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-anyon-particles-emerge-from-quantum-knots-20170228/


https://www.sciencenews.org/article/collisions-reveal-new-evidence-anyon-quasiparticles-existence


https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/welcome-anyons-physicists-find-best-evidence-yet-for-long-sought-2d-structures/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axion


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluon


https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,