Skip to main content

Can the brane theory explain the Big Bang?

 

 

The image that I just put in the last text is introducing the hypothetical point of the Big Bang. Can that mysterious explosion be formed when two branes are touching each other? That means that the Big Bang was the giant electric arc. 

The biggest question in the Big Bang theory is where the material or energy formed? The wave movement can turn to the particle. But where did that wave movement come from? Was there some kind of white hole that brought the wave movement to the third dimension? 

To turn wave movement into a particle is possible. But it requires that the lines of wave movements are crossing. And that requires that there are two sources for wave movement. 

And that thing could cause the wave movement to turn to material in the form that we know it. There is the possibility that the extremely high-energy explosion can push the quantum fields away from each other. And that thing causes the zero-energy conditions at that point. 


When we are thinking of the dimensions as the energy levels. That causes the possibility. That material would travel from the fourth and the second dimension to that bubble where those materials impact. 


The impact between those different material states would be extremely rough. And that caused the wave movement started to flow to the third dimension. This thing caused this wave movement impact with straight superstrings and caused the formation of the material. 

The idea is that we are living in the third dimension. In the second dimension, the material is "flat". It has length and width. In the third dimension, the material has also depth. And the fourth dimension means that the material has a form that cannot model to the third dimension. 

Dark matter would be a material that has a different energy state than visible material. That means dark matter would be closer to the fourth and the second dimensions. The idea is that the particles would not suddenly transform to the four- or two-dimensional. The material would slide to another dimension. If we think like this: another dimension is the state of energy that we cannot observe. 

In that model, the fourth dimension is in a higher energy level than the third dimension. And the second dimension is the lower energy state than the third dimension.

When the material stabilized in a certain dimension. It starts to release its energy. And then it falls through dimensions. The material releases its energy. Until it reaches the same energy level as its environment has. When the energy level of the material is higher energy flows to the environment. And things like the expansion of the universe mean that the energy level of the environment is decreasing. 


In the same way, we cannot model 3D structures in two-dimensional layers. In the same way, the fourth dimension is impossible to model in a 3D universe. 


The brane theory explains the material and its relationship with the fourth dimension. That material is not suddenly turned four-dimensional. The material would slide to the fourth dimension. The interaction between the particle that is locked in the third dimension and the particle that is sliding to the fourth dimension just turns weaker and weaker. The thing that causes sliding to another dimension is the energy load or energy release. 

When the distance of the energy level or the state of those two particles is turning higher. That causes the other particle is sliding to the fourth dimension. And sooner or later that particle slides out from the sight. That means the state of dark matter would be the state of the material that is far away from the visible material. 


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brane


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brane_cosmology


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-dimensional_space


https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The LK-99 could be a fundamental advance even if it cannot reach superconductivity in 400K.

The next step in superconducting research is that LK-99 was not superconducting at room temperature. Or was it? The thing is that there is needed more research about that material. And even if it couldn't reach superconductivity in 400K that doesn't mean that material is not fundamental. And if LK-99 can maintain its superconductivity in 400K that means a fundamental breakthrough in superconducting technology.  The LK-99 can be hype or it can be the real thing. The thing is, anyway, that high-voltage cables and our electric networks are not turning superconducting before next summer. But if we can change the electric network to superconducting by using some reasonable material. That thing can be the next step in the environment. Superconductors decrease the need to produce electricity. But today cooling systems that need lots of energy are the thing that turn superconductors that need low temperatures non-practical for everyday use.  When the project begins there is lots of ent

Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.

 Black holes, the speed of light, and gravitational background are things that are connecting the universe.  Black holes and gravitational waves: is black hole's singularity at so high energy level that energy travels in one direction in the form of a gravitational wave.  We normally say that black holes do not send radiation. And we are wrong. Black holes send gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are wave movement or radiation. And that means the black holes are bright gravitational objects.  If we can use water to illustrate the gravitational interaction we can say that gravitational waves push the surface tension out from the gravitational center. Then the other quantum fields push particles or objects into a black hole. The gravitational waves push energy out from the objects. And then the energy or quantum fields behind that object push them into the gravitational center.  The elementary particles are quantum fields or whisk-looking structures. If the gravitational wave is

The CEO of Open AI, Sam Altman said that AI development requires a similar organization as IAEA.

We know that there are many risks in AI development. And there must be something that puts people realize that these kinds of things are not jokes. The problem is how to take control of the AI development. If we think about international contracts regarding AI development. We must realize that there is a possibility that the contract that should limit AI development turns into another version of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That treaty didn't ever deny the escalation of nuclear weapons. And there is a big possibility that the AI-limitation contracts follow the route of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  The biggest problem with AI development is the new platforms that can run every complicated and effective code. That means the quantum computer-based neural networks can turn themselves more intelligent than humans. The AI has the ultimate ability to learn new things. And if it runs on the quantum-hybrid system that switches its state between binary and quantum states,